0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views10 pages

Analyzing a Part Model Using Ansys Workbench

The document outlines a finite element analysis (FEA) workflow using Ansys Workbench, detailing five linked stages from CAD import to validated stress results. It emphasizes the importance of geometry preparation, meshing, applying boundary conditions and loads, solving, and post-processing results, including validation through convergence studies. Key recommendations include parameterizing models for efficiency, conducting mesh convergence studies before finalizing stress values, and always validating FEA results against hand calculations.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views10 pages

Analyzing a Part Model Using Ansys Workbench

The document outlines a finite element analysis (FEA) workflow using Ansys Workbench, detailing five linked stages from CAD import to validated stress results. It emphasizes the importance of geometry preparation, meshing, applying boundary conditions and loads, solving, and post-processing results, including validation through convergence studies. Key recommendations include parameterizing models for efficiency, conducting mesh convergence studies before finalizing stress values, and always validating FEA results against hand calculations.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FEA WORKFLOW · MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ANSYS · WB

Analyzing a Part
Model Using Ansys
Workbench
A practical finite element workflow — from CAD import to
validated stress results.

STATIC STRUCTURAL · LINEAR FEA · 10 SLIDES

Workshop Dark Edition · v2024 FIG. 0 — HERO / FEA BRACKET CONTOUR ● 01 / 10


Five linked stages from CAD to validated
WORKFLOW AT A GLANCE

results
Ansys Workbench chains each step as a project cell — outputs of one feed the next, so a geometry or material
change automatically propagates through to results. 02 / 09

01 02 03 04 05
Geometry & Meshing Boundary Solve Results
Materials Conditions & Loads
Discretize into finite Configure solver, run, Inspect stress, deformation,
Import CAD, simplify, assign elements; control size, type, Apply fixtures, contacts, monitor Newton–Raphson factor of safety; validate.
linear elastic material quality. forces, pressure, gravity. convergence.
properties.

AT A GLANCE

5 LINKED STAGES 2– TYPICAL BUILD 1 PARAMETERIZED MODEL N1.8 SOLVE-TIME SCALING


end-to-end chain
4h single source of truth node-count exponent
TIME
CAD → first run
STEP 01 / 05 GEOMETRY & MATERIALS

Geometry & Materials


Import the part, clean the load path, then assign an isotropic linear elastic material
from Ansys Engineering Data.

Import: STEP / IGES / Parasolid from SolidWorks, Creo, NX, or SpaceClaim — preserve mm-
kg-s units.
Simplify: defeature fillets <0.5 mm, embossed logos, tapped holes that do not affect the
load path.
Material: Structural Steel from Engineering Data — E = 200 GPa, ν = 0.30, ρ = 7850 kg/m³,
σ_yield = 250 MPa.
Coordinate check: align primary load axis with global X so BCs read cleanly downstream.

Volume check: confirm mass vs. CAD mass properties — divergence > 2% means geometry
import dropped a face.

Tip: keep a named DesignXplorer parameter on the load magnitude so the model
lightbulb can sweep later.
Fig. 1 — Bracket CAD model ready for FEA pre- 03 /
processing. 10
STEP 02 / 05 MESHING

Meshing
Discretize the part into finite elements. Mesh density drives accuracy, but it also
drives solve time — choose deliberately, not by default.

Element type: 10-node tetrahedra (SOLID187) for general geometry; hex-dominant for
swept / extruded bodies.
Sizing: global relevance 100; body sizing 2 mm on fillets and contact zones.

Refinement: 3-level refinement at high-stress regions using Body Sizing + Face Meshing.

Quality targets: Avg Skewness < 0.45, Orthogonal Quality > 0.50, Max Aspect Ratio < 20.

Count: typical bracket 50k–250k nodes; solve time scales roughly as N1.8.

187 <0.45 >0.50


Fig. 2 — Tetrahedral vs. hexahedral element mesh on 04 /
NODES / ELM SKEW ORTHO
the part. 10
STEP 03 / 05 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS & LOADS

Boundary Conditions & Loads


Constrain the part to remove rigid-body motion, then apply the real-world loads.
Wrong BCs invalidate everything downstream.

Fixed Support: clamp two bolt holes (all 6 DOF zeroed).

Cylindrical Support: pin bore — radial fixed, axial and tangential free.

Force: 5 kN applied normal to the load face, distributed by area.

Pressure: 2.5 MPa on the contact pad.

Standard Earth Gravity: 9.81 m/s² along −Y.

Contacts: bonded (default) for assembly; frictional μ = 0.15 where slip is expected.

Check: Σ reaction forces at supports must equal Σ applied loads — otherwise


balance the model is unbalanced.
Fig. 3 — Fixtures and applied loads on the bracket. 05 / 10
Solver Setup & Run
STEP 04 / 05 SOLVER · NEWTON–RAPHSON CONVERGENCE

Pick the right solver type, enable weak springs to guard against rigid-body drift, then watch the Newton–Raphson residual converge.

tune memory lock


Analysis Settings Solver Type Weak Springs
Static Structural, Large Deflection OFF (linear). 1 Direct (sparse) for <200k DOF; Iterative PCG for ON — suppresses rigid-body drift when BCs under-
substep, auto time-stepping OFF for linear static. larger models. Workbench auto-selects based on constrain. Disable for final run once stability is
node count. confirmed.

shutter_speed show_chart schedule


Inertia Relief Convergence Run Time
OFF — only use when no real fixture exists. Auto- Force-based residual < 0.5%. Newton–Raphson ~3–8 min for a 100k-node model on an 8-core
balances applied loads for free-body analysis. iterations typically converge in 3–5 steps for linear workstation, 32 GB RAM. Solve time ≈ k · N1.8.
elastic.

1 SOLVER 6 DOF/NODE 4 NR ITERATIONS 0.5% RESIDUAL


Results & Post-Processing
STEP 05 / 05 RESULTS · POST-PROCESSING

Extract the engineering answers — peak stress, deflection, and factor of safety — and sanity-
check them against hand calcs before signing off.
Equivalent (von Mises) Stress: peak 178 MPa on the inner fillet — below σ_yield of 250 MPa.

Total Deformation: max 0.42 mm at the load point; design limit is 0.50 mm.

Directional Deformation: load-axis deflection matches hand-calc Mc/I within 8%.


Factor of Safety: 1.40 minimum across the model; recommend > 1.5 for ductile steel under static
load.
Probe & verify: reaction-force sum at supports = applied load ±0.3% — model is balanced.

178 MPa 0.42 mm 1.40


PEAK STRESS DEFLECTION FACTOR OF SAFETY
Fig. 4 — von Mises stress contour on the part (Ansys).
Mesh Convergence & Validation
VERIFICATION

Peak stress is mesh-dependent until it stabilizes. Run a refinement study and compare against a hand calc before trusting any FEA number.

MESH DENSITY ELEMENTS PEAK STRESS (MPA) SOLVE TIME

Coarse 8,400 142 0:42

Medium 52,300 167 2:15

Fine REC OMME N DE D 198,000 176 7:48

Very Fine 612,000 178 24:10

Convergence Validation
Peak stress stabilizes at ~178 MPa beyond 200k elements. The medium mesh (52k) Hand calc σ = Mc/I gives 165 MPa at the fillet. FEA peak (178 MPa) sits within 8% of
under-predicts by ~6% — acceptable for design iteration, not for sign-off. the hand calc — the stress concentration at the fillet root explains the small excess.
Acceptable.

RULE: NEVER SIGN OFF ON PEAK STRESS WITHOUT A CONVERGENCE STUDY.


Five stages,
CLOSING

one repeatable workflow.


Geometry → Mesh → Boundary Conditions → Solve → Results. Master the chain, then drive the
model with parameters and convergence studies.
Workflow is repeatable: parameterize loads and mesh size so design iterations take minutes, not
hours.
Mesh matters: a convergence study is mandatory before signing off on peak stress values.
Validate: always compare FEA against hand calcs or test data; never trust a single run.
Speed vs. accuracy: medium mesh for design iterations, fine mesh for final sign-off.
Document: keep material spec, BC rationale, and mesh stats alongside every results report.

Ansys Workbench · Static Structural · Workshop Dark Edition Fig. 5 — Deformation field, final validated run.

09 / 10
ANSYS · WB · END OF DECK

Thank You.
Questions, mesh convergence deep-dives, or a walkthrough of the bracket
model — happy to dig in.

ANSYS WORKBENCH · STATIC STRUCTURAL · WORKSHOP DARK EDITION

Workshop Dark Edition · v2024 10 / 10

You might also like