SOCRATES (470–399 BCE)

Life
 Born in Athens, to a well-off family — but later gave up all his possessions to focus
on his mission.
 Father: Sophronicus, a sculptor. Mother: Phaenarete, a midwife.
 He studied astronomy, geometry, and philosophy.
 He was a brave soldier.
 He was also a natural mystic — he could go into long periods of deep thought/trance.
 He believed he had an inner voice, a "daimon," which guided his decisions.
 He was influenced by Protagoras's saying "man is the measure of all things," and the
Delphic Oracle's saying "know thyself."
 He was a humanist.
Death
 His ideas were too radical for the powerful people of Athens.
 He was falsely accused of two things:
1. Not worshipping the gods the State worshipped, and introducing new religious
practices.
2. Corrupting the youth.
 He could have chosen exile instead of death, but he chose to die — he said his inner
voice (daimon) told him to respect the laws of the State till the end.
 He died by drinking hemlock (poison).
Works
 He never wrote anything himself.
 He just talked/conversed with people on every topic, wherever he found them.
 We know about him mainly through 3 sources:
1. Xenophon (Greek historian)
2. Plato (his student, through the Dialogues)
3. Aristotle

1
The Socratic Problem
 His main concern was about knowledge.
 At his time, the Sophists taught that knowledge is relative (different for each person)
— Socrates felt this caused confusion.
 Against them, he believed there ARE universal, objective truths — and these truths are
found in definitions.
 A definition stays the same even when individual things (that fit the definition) are
different from each other.
Example: Definition of Man
 Man is defined as a "rational animal."
 This definition is true everywhere, for every man — whether he uses reason or not.
 It would even stay true if no man existed at all.
 Same with ethical values — e.g., justice means the same thing everywhere.
 Here we see the influence of Parmenides and Zeno — Socrates agreed that essential
natures/definitions don't change.
 BUT: Aristotle tells us Socrates did NOT separate these definitions into a separate
existing world. It was Socrates's successor (Plato) who gave them a separate existence
— calling them "Ideas."
 In short: Socrates found the "universal essence" idea, but he didn't work out the deeper
philosophical implications of it (like how a universal idea relates to individual real
things). Plato did that later.
Socratic Method — Dialectic / Midwifery (Maieutic)
 How did Socrates form universal definitions? Through dialectics — a method of
questioning and discussion.
 He would talk to people in public places. Pretending not to know the answer
(professing ignorance), he'd ask them to define concepts like courage, justice, piety.
 If their answer was not good enough, he'd keep challenging them with different
examples/contexts until they reached the best, most universal definition possible.
Socratic Irony
 His act of pretending ignorance (even when he actually knew good definitions) is
called "Socratic irony."
 Purpose: to expose false claims of wisdom, and help people know their true nature.
2
  This could feel irritating or embarrassing for people whose ignorance got exposed in
public, especially in front of youngsters.
 But people appreciated his sincerity — he genuinely wanted to search for truth
together, through universally valid definitions.
 He wasn't focused on small details (not "pedantic") — he wanted people to think and
reason for themselves, so they could form true ideas that lead to right action.
Why "Midwifery"?
 He called his method "midwifery" because, just like a midwife helps a mother deliver
a baby, Socrates helped people bring out (deliver) the truth that was already inside
their own minds.
 This made people own their ideas — the ideas become more practical and turn into
real convictions, not just abstract theory.
 Unlike the Sophists, Socrates believed the human mind CAN reach objective truth —
and this truth is found in universal definitions.
 He was convinced: universal concepts stay the same, while sense knowledge (what we
perceive) keeps changing from person to person, time to time.
Example: "Rational Animal"
 When we say "a human being is a rational animal," this is a universal definition —
found through abstraction, by looking at what's essentially common to all humans.
 Even if every human being disappeared, this definition would still be true forever.
 This universal definition is the standard we use to judge if something is genuine or
not.
 Socrates believed the whole point of studying philosophy is to live a right ethical life.
Example: Justice (from Plato's Republic — Thrasymachus)
The Sophist Thrasymachus said: "Justice means what is in the interest of those in power."
Socrates showed this leads to a contradiction:
1. To be just = to obey the laws of those in power.
2. Those in power can make mistakes.
3. So they might create laws that are NOT actually in their own interest.
4. To obey such (mistaken) laws = to act against the interest of those in power.
5. So "being just" would sometimes mean doing what is NOT in the interest of power —
which contradicts point 1.
3
Religion and Ethics
 He respected Athens's traditional gods in his speech, but often shifted toward talking
about one God (monotheistic language).
 He believed God is present everywhere, and knows everything said and done.
 Since God knows what's best for each person, we should simply pray for "the good" in
general — not for specific things.
 He believed he had a mission from God: to help people care for their souls (their
noblest possession).
 He valued pleasure and happiness — but only if they respect morality.
 He deeply cared about Justice, Truth, and Goodness.
 For him, philosophy was not a job/profession (like it was for the Sophists) — it was a
way of life.
Knowledge is Virtue
 His biggest contribution: he connected knowledge (epistemology) with virtue
(ethics).
 True knowledge and virtue are actually the same thing.
 Virtue comes naturally from knowledge — if you truly know what's right, you will do
what's right.
 Searching for general truth = searching for virtue.
 An action is right if it leads to true happiness. A merely pleasant action (like getting
drunk regularly) does NOT lead to true happiness.
 So: right knowledge → virtue.
 Question: Who actually HAS this knowledge? Socrates said no one really has it — not
even himself — but he never stopped believing in it or searching for it.
Evaluation of Socrates
 Hegel said: "the wounds of reason can only be healed by deeper reason" — meaning:
thinking itself is not the problem, we just need better/deeper thinking.
 Socrates tried to offer this "better thinking" as a cure for a sick society.
 This is why Socrates said society needs not democracy, but an aristocratic state ruled
by philosophers.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
4
a) His focus on the soul and virtue prepared the ground for later acceptance of Christianity.
b) His ethics was better than traditional morality or the Sophists' morality — but had
problems:
 i. Error of humanism: he taught that man alone (without divine help) is enough to
practice virtue.
 ii. Just because someone knows what's right doesn't mean they'll actually do it. We
know people can (and do) do wrong even while knowing it's wrong.
 c) He was too intellectualist — he over-stressed that knowledge alone is enough for
virtue. But love/will is also important for actually practicing virtue.

PLATO (428–347 BCE)

Life
 Born in Athens, into a distinguished family.
 He was Socrates's disciple.
 Originally wanted to go into politics, but after seeing how badly the State treated
Socrates, he gave up politics for philosophy.
The Academy
 Plato founded the Academy around 388 B.C., near the sanctuary of Academus (a
Greek god/hero).
 It is called the first European university — because it wasn't just philosophy; it
included mathematics, astronomy, physical sciences — though everything ultimately
led back to philosophy.
His Works
 Unlike Aristotle, Plato never published his actual Academy lectures.
 But his Dialogues were published — meant for general/popular reading (different
from his lectures for serious students).
 36 Dialogues are attributed to him; only 24 considered genuine (6 are fake, 6
unconfirmed).
 His works fall into 4 periods, showing how his thought developed:
1. The Socratic Period (399–387 B.C.)
Still influenced by his teacher Socrates.

5
  Apology – Socrates's defence at his trial
 Crito – Socrates as a good citizen
 Ion – Against poets
 Protagoras – virtue is knowledge
 Republic Book I – on justice
2. The Transition Period (387 B.C.)
Plato starting to form his own views.
 Gorgias – justice at all costs
 Meno – more on teaching justice
 Hippias I – on the beautiful
 Hippias II – on doing wrong voluntarily/involuntarily
 Cratylus – theory of language
3. The Period of Maturity (ending 367 B.C.)
He has now formed his own opinions, mainly the Ideal Theory (Theory of Forms).
 Symposium – earthly beauty is only a shadow of true Beauty
 Phaedo – Ideas and Immortality
 Republic – The State
 Phaedrus – Nature of Love
4. The Period of Old Age (367 B.C. onward)
He reconsiders or defends his Ideal Theory.
 Theaetetus – knowledge is not sense-perception or true judgement
 Parmenides – defence of the Ideal Theory
 Politicus – the true ruler is the one who has knowledge
 Timaeus – natural science
 Critias – ideal agrarian State
Historical Background
 Plato went back to studying the ultimate nature of reality — moving from just
studying man, to studying the whole universe.

6
  He believed ethical problems about man can't be properly solved until we understand
man's place in the universe — we must first understand the unchangeable order
beyond time.
Plato vs. Heraclitus
 Plato was influenced by Cratylus (a follower of Heraclitus), who said everything is
always changing.
 Plato agreed — but only about the sensible world (the world we see/touch). This
world is always in flux/change, so we can never have true knowledge of it — only
opinion.
Plato vs. Parmenides
 Plato was also influenced by Parmenides, who said "being" is unchangeable,
changeless, and one (single).
 Plato agreed there IS an unchangeable order of true reality — but disagreed that it's
only "one." For Plato, there are MANY truly real beings.
 Also, following Socrates, Plato believed the truly real is higher than matter — it is
spiritual, because it goes beyond time and change, and shares the nature of mind/soul.
This is what gives order to the universe.
Result
 Because of this, Plato mostly ignored the sensible world. He focused instead on the
stable truths of mathematics and ethics.
 He built his philosophy "a priori" — starting from necessary truths, not from
observing the physical world.
 Because he ignored the sensible/physical order, he also ignored causality and dynamic
change — so his philosophy is a kind of "static" description of the world of Forms and
souls.
Theory of Knowledge
Found mainly in his Dialogues Theaetetus (negative side — what knowledge is NOT) and
Republic (positive side — what knowledge IS).
True knowledge must have 2 conditions:
1. It must be infallible (cannot be wrong).
2. It must be knowledge of what truly IS (of the real).
Why sense perception is NOT true knowledge:

7
  Heraclitus said: things we sense are always changing — they never simply "are," they
are always "becoming." So they can't give certain knowledge.
 If sense perception WAS true knowledge, there would be no difference between wise
and ignorant people — everyone would just trust their own perception equally. But
most people agree some people ARE wiser than others.
 Knowledge is more than sense perception — it involves rational reflection too (like
knowing about existence/non-existence).
True Knowledge = Knowledge of Universals
 Following Socrates, Plato said true knowledge must be about something permanent,
something that can be captured in a scientific definition.
 So true knowledge is of universals, not particular things.
 Example: the universal idea of "goodness" stays the same, even though particular good
things in the world may not last.
Process of Knowledge (The Line)
The mind moves from ignorance to true knowledge through two main stages, each having
two sub-stages:
Stage 1: Opinion
 a. Illusion
 b. Belief
Stage 2: Knowledge
 a. Mathematical reasoning
 b. Intelligence
This is explained with the Analogy of the Line — the bottom is illusion, the top is true
knowledge, and one can move ("be converted") upward through the stages.
 Illusion: knowing only shadows/images of material things — includes all false
knowledge about the material world.
 Belief: knowing the actual individual material object, but without realizing it is just an
imperfect copy of the real universal.
 Mathematical Reasoning: a middle level. Mathematical objects (like circles,
numbers) are eternal and unchanging (like Forms) — but unlike Forms, there can be
MANY similar mathematical objects (many circles), while each Form is completely

8
 unique. Example: mathematics deals with an actual circle, not "circularity" itself; with
the number three, not "three-ness" itself.
 Intelligence: the highest stage — true knowledge. Here the mind directly grasps the
Forms themselves (first principles), using pure abstract reasoning, with no images or
intermediaries needed.
The Myth (Allegory) of the Cave
(From Book VII of the Republic, illustrating his theory of knowledge)
 Imagine an underground cave with an opening to daylight.
 Prisoners have been chained since childhood, facing the inner wall — they've never
seen the sun.
 Behind them is a fire, and between the fire and them is a raised walkway with a small
wall/screen.
 People walk along this walkway carrying objects (figures of men, animals, etc.) —
some talking, some silent.
 The prisoners can't see each other or the objects directly — they only see the shadows
cast on the wall in front of them.
Meaning:
 The prisoners = most of humankind — living in illusion, believing shadows are reality.
 Even if freed suddenly, they'd be blinded by the light and would think the shadows
were MORE real than actual things.
 If a prisoner escapes and gets used to the light:
o First he sees the other prisoners and objects as they really are → this is the stage
of Belief.
o Then he goes outside and sees sun-lit objects (representing intelligible realities)
→ stage of Mathematical Reasoning.
o Finally, with effort, he can look at the sun itself → representing the highest
Form, the Idea of the Good — "the source of truth and reason." This is the
stage of pure Intelligence — the highest knowledge, without needing any
intermediary.
Education
 The "ascent" up the Line happens through education.

9
  Plato insisted the youth must be educated to leave behind passion, prejudice, and
falsehood, to reach the truth.
 This education is especially important for future leaders — "lest being blind
themselves they should lead the blind."
 In his ideal Republic, the leaders should be philosopher-kings — those who have
made this ascent to truth.
Theory of Forms
 Comes from analyzing our intellectual knowledge and the eternal, unchangeable truths
our mind gives us.
 Every judgement involves a standard. E.g., when we judge something is "beautiful,"
we're comparing it to the standard/essence of Beauty — this essence is the Form (or
Idea) of Beauty.
 Forms are "super-empirical" — beyond the world of men and sensible things. Why?
1. Self-identical — Goodness is always goodness; it doesn't change even if
particular good things change.
2. Unique — since they're self-identical, there's only ONE type of true, essential
goodness.
3. Necessarily immutable — they are eternally the same; so they have a higher
kind of existence than things that exist in time/space.
 Forms are NOT just ideas in our mind (not subjective). They are known through pure
abstraction, and they exist independently of our knowledge — because whatever
measures our knowledge (the standard) must be greater than what it measures.
 Forms exist objectively, apart from the mind — they are "subsistent essences": not
mental, not physical, but still fully real.
 Since Forms are separate from sensible reality, there's a big gap between the sensible
world and the spiritual/Form world.
o Sensible world: unstable, many, changing (e.g., houses, dogs, relations)
o Spiritual/Form world: permanent, self-identical (e.g., goodness, whiteness)
Variety of Forms
 Every class of things has its own Form/Idea.
 These Forms are arranged in a hierarchy — not all equal. At the very top is the Form
of the Good, and everything else is under it.

10
  Forms are what's TRULY real. Particular things are just appearances/copies of the
Forms.
 The relationship between particular things and their Form is called "participation."
E.g., individual cows "participate" in the Form of "cowness."
 Forms can only be known through reason, not the senses — but the senses are what
trigger (occasion) our knowledge of the Forms.
 We live "in a cage" (in the world of the senses), so we know shadows before we know
true reality. We know the sensible/changeable before the eternal/unchanging — but the
sensible world alone can never fully explain what's truly real.
Plato's Ethical Theory
 Understood against the background of Sophist relativism.
 Sophists said moral norms are based on personal opinion or social convention —
meaning whoever is most persuasive (or most powerful) in society decides what's
ethical. (Slides give the extreme example: this logic could apply equally to a Hitler or
a Mother Teresa.)
 Plato's approach: Ethics is an objective science, just like mathematics.
o In mathematics, we study non-physical Forms like Circularity, Triangularity,
Equality.
o In Ethics, we study Forms like Justice and Good.
Why be moral? (Glaucon's 3 categories of "good things")
1. Good just for their own sake, not their results (e.g., enjoying a sunset).
2. Good both for their own sake AND their results (e.g., knowledge, health).
3. Good only for their results — burdensome in themselves (e.g., going to the dentist).
 Glaucon says most people place Justice in category 3 (we only do it for
reward/reputation, not because we enjoy it).
 Socrates disagrees — he says the just life belongs in category 2 (valued both for itself
AND its results). This is illustrated by a thought experiment involving a person with a
magical ring.
Theory of the Soul (Human Nature)
 For Plato, the essential core of a person is the psyche (soul — meaning "self," not a
religious soul).
 Our soul has inner conflicts — different desires/drives pulling against each other.
11
  There's conflict between the desires of the appetite and the desires of the spirit.
Three parts of the soul:
1. Appetite — bodily desires ("I want, I want") — the lowest, most dangerous part.
2. Reason — the love of truth.
3. Spirit — the willful, dynamic, active part, guided by the other two.
The Chariot Image (from Phaedrus)
 The charioteer = reason — must control the other two.
 One horse = spirit — eager to obey, loves glory but with modesty, needs no whip.
 The other horse = appetite — eager to run wild, hard to control even with a whip,
pulls the chariot off course.
 Only when reason properly guides both, does the person move in the right direction.
The Four Cardinal Virtues (each linked to a part of the soul):
1. Wisdom — when reason is in control and guides the rest of the soul.
2. Courage — when the spirited part obeys reason and directs its energy/ambition
toward the right goals.
3. Temperance — when the appetites are controlled/moderated, staying subordinate to
the higher two parts.
4. Justice — the overarching virtue, present when ALL the parts are properly balanced
together.
 The just person has wisdom, courage, and temperance all working in their proper
place.
 Moral goodness brings the highest pleasure and happiness.
 Justice = health of the soul; wickedness = like a cancer of the soul.
 So the question "why be moral?" is like asking "why control my own life instead of
being enslaved to wild desires? Why be healthy instead of diseased?" — a ridiculous
question, according to Plato.
Political Theory
 Socrates, while explaining the "just life," shifts to talking about the "just society" —
because society is like a person "written large" (bigger version).
 Principles of individual psychology = principles of a just society (same structure).

12
  A person and a good society depend on each other — you can't live a good life apart
from the state.
The State as an Organism
 For Plato, the state is like a living organism — each part exists for the good of the
whole.
 The best state has a proper division of labour (different people do the jobs they're best
at).
 He is critical of democracy — he believed politics should be handled by experts
(philosopher-kings), not left to the uninformed majority.
Three Classes in Society (matching the 3 parts of the soul):
1. Producers (linked to appetite) — provide life's necessities: farmers, shoemakers,
carpenters, labourers.
2. Guardians (linked to spirit) — protect society from enemies (external and internal).
Divided into:
o Auxiliaries — police/military
o Administrators — enforce policies
3. Rulers (linked to reason) — a select group, chosen for intelligence and philosophical
wisdom.
 Plato's ideal society is a meritocracy — based purely on merit/ability.
Against Democracy
 In democracy, liberty and free speech are everywhere — everyone does what they like.
 Under the excuse of "equality," democratic governments fail to recognize that people
have different abilities.
 If all abilities are treated as equal, this leads to competition/conflict — and rulers end
up just following whichever group shouts loudest.
 This leads to both political AND psychological bondage (slavery to disorder).
Against Oligarchy/Aristocracy (degraded forms):
 Timocracy — rule driven by love of honour and ambition.
 Plutocracy — rule driven by love of money.
Plato's Cosmology
 Plato believed the universe cannot exist without a governing principle of order.
13
  In Philebus, he points to the regular motion of the heavenly bodies as proof of a
"wondrous regulating intelligence."
 He rejects the Atomists' theory that the world is purely the result of chance (particles
randomly colliding).
 In Timaeus, he says: everything that is created must have a cause. Since the universe is
huge and complex, its cause must be extremely powerful and intelligent.
The Demiurge
 This supreme cause is called God or the Demiurge (meaning "Craftsman").
 Plato's God is a craftsman — like someone building something out of raw material,
following a blueprint.
 The raw material is completely formless and chaotic; the blueprint is made of the
eternal Forms.
 The Demiurge didn't personally create every single object — after "sowing the seed,"
he let the creative/rational powers of the cosmic soul continue the work of creation.
 Plato explains the universe as having a purpose or goal-directed order — this is
called a teleological explanation.
Evaluation of Plato's Theory of Forms (Problems raised)
 Are there Forms even of ugly/disgusting things like hair, mud, filth?
 What exactly is the relationship between a Form and the many particular things that
share it? How does ONE Form of "humanity" get shared/distributed among many
individual people?
 The Third Man Argument: If the Form of "Man" explains what two individual men
(e.g., Harry and Robert) have in common, then what explains the similarity between
the Form of Man itself and the actual individual men? (This seems to require another,
higher Form — leading to an endless chain.)

That covers Socrates and Plato completely and strictly from your slides, Your Majesty. Want
me to continue the same way for Aristotle (slide 119 onward) next?

14