0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Ex Mid Review

The document outlines various numerical integration techniques including the Composite Rectangle Rule, Midpoint Rule, Trapezoidal Rule, and Simpson’s 1/3 Rule, with specific problems for each method. It also covers finite difference formulas for approximating derivatives and the central difference formula for the second derivative. Each section includes tasks to approximate integrals or derivatives, compare with exact values, and determine the least integer n for error bounds.

Uploaded by

thaianngo1624
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Ex Mid Review

The document outlines various numerical integration techniques including the Composite Rectangle Rule, Midpoint Rule, Trapezoidal Rule, and Simpson’s 1/3 Rule, with specific problems for each method. It also covers finite difference formulas for approximating derivatives and the central difference formula for the second derivative. Each section includes tasks to approximate integrals or derivatives, compare with exact values, and determine the least integer n for error bounds.

Uploaded by

thaianngo1624
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

A.

Composite Rectangle Rule


1. Let Z 2
I(f ) = (1 + x2 )e−x dx.
0

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite left rectangle rule with h = 0.25, compare
with a reference value, and compute the absolute error.
(b) Find the least integer n such that

ER = |I(f ) − IR | ≤ 10−3 .

2. Let Z 3
I(f ) = x ln(1 + x) dx.
1

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite left rectangle rule with n = 8, compare
with the exact value, and compute the absolute error.
(b) Find the least integer n such that

ER ≤ 10−4 .

3. Let Z 1 √
I(f ) = 1 + x4 dx.
0

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite left rectangle rule with h = 0.1, compare
with a reference value, and compute the absolute error.
(b) Find the least integer n such that

ER ≤ 10−3 .

B. Composite Midpoint Rule


1. Let
2
ex
Z
I(f ) = dx.
0 (1 + ex )3
(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite midpoint rule with h = 0.2, and estimate
EM .
(b) Find the least integer n such that EM ≤ 10−4 .

2. Let Z π  
13
I(f ) = cos x + x sin x dx.
0 2
(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite midpoint rule with h = π8 , and estimate
EM .
(b) Find the least integer n such that EM ≤ 10−5 .

4
3. Let Z 1
I(f ) = ex (cos x + x sin x) dx.
0

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite midpoint rule with h = 0.2, compare with
the exact value, and compute the absolute error.
(b) Find the least integer n such that EM ≤ 10−3 .

C. Composite Trapezoidal Rule


1. Let Z 2
I(f ) = (x + 1) cos(2x) dx.
0

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite trapezoidal rule with h = 21 , and estimate
ET .
(b) Find the least integer n such that ET ≤ 10−3 .

2. Let Z 2
I(f ) = (1 + x)ex dx.
0

(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite trapezoidal rule with h = 0.2, compare
with the exact value, and compute the absolute error.
(b) Find the least integer n such that ET ≤ 10−4 .

3. Let Z 1
1+x
I(f ) = dx.
0 1 + x + x2
(a) Approximate I(f ) by the composite trapezoidal rule with h = 0.2, and esti-
mate ET .
(b) Find the least integer n such that ET ≤ 10−5 .

D. Composite Simpson’s 1/3 Rule


1. Let Z 2
1+x
I(f ) = dx.
0 1 + 12x2
(a) Approximate I(f ) by Simpson’s 1/3 rule with n = 2m = 8, and estimate ES1/3 .
(b) Find the least even integer n such that ES1/3 ≤ 10−5 .

2. Let Z 1
2
I(f ) = (1 + x2 )ex dx.
−1

(a) Approximate I(f ) by Simpson’s 1/3 rule with h = 0.5, and estimate ES1/3 .
(b) Find the least even integer n such that ES1/3 ≤ 10−4 .

5
E. Finite Difference Formulas by Equating Coefficients
1. Develop, by equating coefficients, a formula for f ′′ (x) using only

f (x − 3h), f (x), f (x + 3h).

Find the truncation error. Then approximate f ′′ (0.5) with h = 0.05 for
ex
f (x) = .
1−x
Estimate the error.

2. Develop, by equating coefficients, a formula for f ′′ (x) using only

f (x − 4h), f (x), f (x + 4h).

Find the truncation error and the order of convergence. Then approximate f ′′ (π/2)
with h = π/8 for
f (x) = e−x sin(2x).
Estimate the error.

3. Develop, by equating coefficients, a formula for f ′ (x) using only

f (x − h), f (x), f (x + 3h).

Find the truncation error and the order of convergence. Then approximate f ′ (−0.5)
with h = 0.05 for
ex
f (x) = .
(1 + x)2
Estimate the error.

4. Develop, by equating coefficients, a formula for f ′ (x) using only

f (x − 9h), f (x), f (x + 3h).

Find the truncation error and the order of convergence. Then approximate f ′ (2)
with h = 0.1 for r
x+2
f (x) = .
x+1
Estimate the error.

5. Develop, by equating coefficients, a formula for f ′′ (x) using only

f (x − 2h), f (x), f (x + 2h).

Find the truncation error and the order of convergence. Then approximate f ′′ (1.5)
with h = 0.05 for
x
f (x) = .
1 + ln x
Estimate the error.

6
F. Central Difference Formula for the Second Derivative
1. Use the central difference formula to approximate f ′′ (π), where

f (x) = (1 + sin x)esin x ,

for h = π/8, π/4, π/2, respectively. Find the exact value of f ′′ (π), compute the
absolute error for each h, and verify the error estimate predicted by the theory.

2. Use the central difference formula to approximate f ′′ (0.5), where

2/3 3/2
 x2
f (x) = 1 − x + ,
10
for h = 0.01, 0.1, 0.25, respectively. Find the exact value of f ′′ (0.5), compute the
absolute error for each h, and verify the error estimate predicted by the theory.

3. Use the central difference formula to approximate f ′′ (1), where


r
1
f (x) = x2 + 2x + ,
2
for h = 0.01, 0.1, 0.25, respectively. Find the exact value of f ′′ (1), compute the
absolute error for each h, and verify the error estimate predicted by the theory.

You might also like