Structural Engineering Lecture Notes
Structural Engineering Lecture Notes
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING-I
REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
BY
B. SURESH KUMAR
([Link], MRITS)
UNIT-I
UNIT-2
3. Design for Flexure
4. Design for Shear
5. Design for Bond
BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
Concrete consists of the following ingredients:
It is fed into a rotary kiln and blasted at 1500oC. Clinker (of nodular shape) is obtained, which is
cooled and ground into fine powder. To this 3-5% Gypsum is added to prevent quick setting of
cement.
The cement, thus obtained, contains four major compounds known as Bogue’s Compounds:
Coarse Aggregates
particle size > 4.75mm
generally used – Hard blasted granite chips
The nominal maximum size of aggregate should be < (1/4)th the minimum thickness of
the member
In case of heavily reinforced sections, nominal maximum size of aggregate should be
Clear distance between bars minus 5mm whichever is smaller
Minimum cover to reinforcements minus 5mm
Grading of Aggregates
‘Grading’ is the particle size distribution of aggregate; it is measured by sieve analysis, and
is generally described by means of a grading curve, which depicts the ‘cumulative
percentage passing’ against the standard IS sieve sizes.
In figure, standard grading curves 1, 2, 3 and 4 are shown (plotted per Indian Standards
IS383). The particle size distribution of the given sample of aggregates shall conform to any
of the zones A, B or C. Curve 1 represents the coarsest grading, while curve 4 represents
the finest grading.
The grading (as well as the type and size) of aggregate is a major factor which influences
the workability of fresh concrete, and its consequent degree of compaction.
This is of extreme importance with regard to the quality of hardened concrete, because
incomplete compaction results in voids, thereby lowering the density of the concrete and
preventing it from attaining its full compressive strength capability; furthermore, the
impermeability and durability characteristics get adversely affected.
It is seen from the figure given below that with 95% density (i.e., with 5 percent of voids),
there is only 68% strength (i.e., 32% strength lost). This shows that the presence of just 5%
voids can lower the strength by 32%.
Presence of more “fines” (i.e., cement & sand) in a concrete mix would improve both
workability and resists segregation (segregation means separation of grout from aggregates
in a concrete mix due to addition of excess water to concrete)
Workability
Workability is the ease with which the concrete can be mixed, placed,
consolidated and finished.
Workable concrete is the one which exhibits very little internal friction between
particle and particle or which overcomes the frictional resistance offered by
the formwork surface or reinforcement contained in the concrete.
The factors affecting workability are given below:
Water Content
Mix Proportions
Size of Aggregates
Shape of Aggregates
Surface Texture of Aggregate
Grading of Aggregate
Use of Admixtures
The following tests are commonly employed to measure workability.
Slump Test
Compacting Factor Test
Flow Test
Kelly Ball Test
Vee Bee Consistometer Test
Segregation
Segregation can be defined as the separation of the constituent materials of
concrete.
A good concrete has all its constituents properly distributed to form a
homogenous mixture. To ensure this, optimum grading, size, shape and
surface texture of aggregates with optimum quantity of cement & water makes
a mix cohesive. Such a concrete does not exhibit the tendency for segregation.
Prime cause of segregation is the difference in specific gravity of constituents
of concrete.
Segregation may be one of the following types:
o Coarse aggregate separating out of the rest
o Cement paste or cement-fine aggregate matrix separating out from
coarse aggregate
o Water separating out of the rest
The conditions that favour segregation are:
o Bad mix proportion
o Inadequate mixing
o Excessive compaction by vibration of wet mix
o Large height of dropping of concrete for placement
o Long distance conveyance of mix
Bleeding
Here, water from the concrete comes out to the top surface of the concrete
after casting.
Grade of concrete
Designated in terms of letter ‘M’ followed by a number. ‘M’ refers to mix; the number
represents the 28-day characteristic compressive strength of concrete cubes
(150mm) expressed in MPa.
Eg: M20 denotes the concrete mix with 28-day characteristic compressive strength
of 20MPa.
8. PROPERTIES OF STEEL
Loading Standards :
1) IS 875 (Parts 1-5) : 1987 — Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for
buildings and structures (second revision)
a. Part 1 : Dead loads
b. Part 2 : Imposed (live) loads
c. Part 3 : Wind loads
d. Part 4 : Snow loads
e. Part 5 : Special loads and load combinations
2) IS 1893 : 2002 — Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures (fourth revision).
Design Handbooks :
1) Unnikrishna Pillai & Devdas Menon, “Reinforced Concrete Design”, 3 rd Edition, Tata
McGraw Hill Publishers, 2009
2) Ashok K. Jain, “Reinforced Concrete – Limit State Design”, 6th Edition, Nem Chand &
Bros Publishers, 2002
.
LIMIT STATE METHOD
[Refer Section 5 – Page 67 of IS456]
The acceptable limit for safety and serviceability requirements before failure occurs is
known as Limit State.
LSM involves underestimation of the material strength and overestimation of
external loads. For this, the method uses partial safety factor format.
SAFETY SERVICEABILITY
With due consideration to strength, Satisfactory performance of structure
stability & structural integrity. under service loads. Ensures no
If this condition is satisfied, the discomfort to the user
likelihood for “collapse” is acceptably If this condition is satisfied, the
low under service loads (usual or likelihood for “user discomfort” is
expected loads) as well as probable acceptably low under service loads.
overloads (extreme winds, earthquake User discomfort may occur due to:
etc.) o Deflection
Collapse may occur due to: o Cracking
o Exceeding of strength of o Vibrations
material or load bearing o Durability
capacity of material. o Impermeability
o Sliding o Thermal Insulation (or Fire
o Overturning resistance)
o Buckling Limit states involved in user comfort
o Fatigue are called “Limit state of serviceability”,
o Fracture which are defined for,
Limit states involved in collapse are o Deflection
called “Limit State of Collapse” or o Cracking
“Ultimate Limit State”, which are o Durability
defined for the following, o Fire Resistance
o Flexure
o Compression
o Shear
o Torsion
IMPORTANT TERMINOLOGIES
1. Characteristic Strength
It is the strength of the material below which not more than 5% of the test results are
expected to fall.
Characteristic strength of concrete = 28-day characteristic compressive strength of
150mm concrete cubes (fck). For the design of structures, only 67% of fck is
considered.
Characteristic strength of reinforcing steel = yield strength of steel (fy) or 0.20% Proof
Stress.
2. Characteristic Loads
Loads which have 95% probability of not being exceeded during the life of the
structure.
Magnitudes of these loads are enlisted in:
o IS 875 (Part 1) – Dead Loads
o IS 875 (Part 2) – Live loads
o IS 875 (Part 3) - Windloads
o IS 875 (Part 4) - Snowloads
o IS 875 (Part 5) – Load Combinations
o IS 1893 – Seismic loads
3. Design strength
Characteristic strength of material
Design strength =
Partial safety factor for material
By this, the strength of material is underestimated
Characteristic strength of material = 0.67 fck (for concrete)
= fy (for reinforcing steel)
Partial safety factor for material = 1.5 (for concrete)
= 1.15 (for reinforcing steel)
0.67 fck
Therefore, Design strength of concrete = = 0.447 fck ≈ 0.45 fck
1.5
fy
and, Design strength of steel = = 0.87 fy
1.15
4. Design Loads
Design Load = Characteristic Load x Partial safety factor for corresponding load
By this, the loads on structure are overestimated
Partial safety factor for different loading conditions is given in Table 18 of IS456
(Page 68)
Eg: For Limit State for Collapse
For structures subjected to Dead loads & Live loads
Design load on the structure = 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
For structures subjected to Dead loads & Wind loads
Design load on the structure = 1.5 DL + 1.5 WL
For structures subjected to Dead loads, Live loads & Windloads
Design load on the structure = 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL
o Depth of Neutral axis (where the strain is zero) for a balanced section is designated
as Xu,max.
2) Under-reinforced section
o Steel reaches ultimate stress before concrete.
o Here, yielding of steel occurs first. This is accompanied by wider tensile cracks and
increased curvatures and deflection of the beam. Thus, it gives clear warning to the
user about failure. Finally, failure occurs by crushing of concrete.
o In other words, the steel would already have yielded by the time the concrete crushes.
o Therefore, strain in
o Concrete (at the extreme compression fibre) = εcu = 0.0035
0.87fy
o Steel (on tension side) εst > + 0.002
Es
o Depth of Neutral axis (Xu) for an under-reinforced section is less than Xu,max
o This type of failure is called “Ductile Failure”.
3) Over-reinforced section
o Concrete reaches ultimate stress first.
o Here, crushing of concrete occurs first. It gives no warning to the user about failure.
Hence, it is a catastrophic or disastrous failure.
o In other words, when the concrete at extreme compression fibre crushes, the steel
would not have reached the yield point.
o Therefore, strain in
o Concrete (at the extreme compression fibre) = εcu = 0.0035
0.87fy
o Steel (on tension side) εst < + 0.002
Es
o Depth of Neutral axis (Xu) for an over-reinforced section is greater than Xu,max
o This type of failure is called “Brittle Failure”.
In short, the above three types of sections can be summarized from the strain distribution at
ultimate limit state (i.e. at failure) as shown below.
b = width of beam
D = overall depth of beam
3) Effective span
[Refer Cl. 22.2]
= clear span + d
= span of beam measured between centers of supports whichever is minimum
= clear span + (d/2) (For Cantilever Beams) (For simply supported
beam)
4) Concrete cover
[Refer Cl. 26.4; Table 16]
Clear cover or Nominal cover is the distance measured from the exposed concrete
surface (without plaster and other finishes) to the nearest surface of the reinforcing bar,
including links.
This cover is required
o to protect the reinforcing bars from corrosion and fire
o to give the reinforcing bars sufficient embedment for sufficient bond with concrete
(prevent slippage between concrete & steel).
There is a minimum clear cover value specified for each exposure condition (see previous
table), as this satisfies the durability requirement of RCC structure. The maximum
deviation permitted from these values are “+10 mm and –0mm”.
Minimum clear cover requirements
o for columns = 40 mm
o for footings = 50 mm
5) Spacing of bars
[Refer Cl. 26.3]
Both minimum & maximum limits of spacing between steel bars are specified in code:
o Minimum Limits => ensure that concrete can be placed easily between bars
o Maximum Limits => ensure that concrete crack-widths get controlled and
bond between concrete & steel is improved.
Codal provisions are summarized in the following figure:
(a) Singly Reinforced Beams
Above values of (l/d) ratio shall be modified in accordance with the code, depending
on the following factors: [Refer Cl. 23.2.1 (b) to (e)]
o If span > 10m
o Area & stress in tension reinforcement
o Area of compression reinforcement
o For flanged beams
LIMIT STATE OF COLLAPSE – FLEXURE
[Refer Cl.38 – Page 69 of IS456]
Assumptions
o Plane sections normal to the beam axis remain plane even after bending, i.e., in an
initially straight beam, normal strain varies linearly over the depth of the section.
o The maximum compressive strain in concrete (at the outermost fibre) εcu = 0.0035. This
is so, because regardless of whether the beam is under−reinforced or over- reinforced,
collapse invariably occurs by the crushing of concrete.
o The tensile strength of the concrete is ignored.
o For the section to be balanced or under-reinforced, the strain εst in the tension
reinforcement shall not be less than εy:
0.87fy
=> εst ≥ + 0.002
Es
The distribution of stress and strain across the section is shown above.
From this, the following may be deduced.
The general expression for Depth of Neutral axis (Xu) is obtained from strain diagram,
considering similar triangles.
The limiting value of depth of Neutral axis (Xu,max), which corresponds to a balanced
0.87fy
section, is obtained by substituting εst = + 0.002, in the above equation.
Es
Therefore, we get,
Substituting suitable values of yield strength of steel, the limiting depth of Neutral axis
(Xu,max) may be obtained as follows:
The Concrete Stress block (Compressive stress distribution in concrete at ultimate limit
state) is analysed as follows:
curve
o Derive the value of corresponding to f by considering T = f A and applying the
st st st
o Compare this value of Xu with the initial value assumed in the first step. If the difference
between the two values is acceptably small, accept this value of Xu. Otherwise, repeat
previous steps with an improved (say, average) value of Xu, until convergence.
Limiting moment of resistance of the beam section (Mu,lim) corresponds to the condition
Xu = Xu,max is given by:
Mu,lim = 0.36 fck b xu,max (d – 0.42 xu,max)
OR
Mu,lim = 0.87fy Ast (d – 0.42 xu,max)
Analysis of Doubly reinforced Beams
Doubly reinforced beams are resorted to under following circumstances:
Where cross sectional dimensions of the beam are restricted, due to architectural or other
considerations
Where singly reinforced beam is inadequate to resist moment
Where reversal of moments is likely to occur
Presence of compression reinforcement helps reduce long-term deflection & cracking due to
shrinkage & creep.
The distribution of stress and strain across the section is shown above. From this, the following
may be deduced.
In general practice, the value of ratio (d’/d) ranges between 0.05 to 0.20.
Value of fsc is given by:
o = 0.87 fy = 217.5 N/mm2, for Fe250 grade steel
o If Fe415 or Fe500 is used, the compression steel would not have yielded as
Fe250. Hence, fsc is obtained from εsc.
Value of fsc for a balanced section is given below (in N/mm2)
Page 29 of 95
Page 30 of 95
Page 31 of 95
Page 32 of 95
Page 33 of 95
Page 34 of 95
Page 35 of 95
Page 36 of 95
Page 37 of 95
Page 38 of 95
Page 39 of 95
Page 40 of 95
Page 41 of 95
DESIGN EXAMPLES
Page 42 of 95
Page 43 of 95
Page 44 of 95
Page 45 of 95
Page 46 of 95
Page 47 of 95
Page 48 of 95
Page 49 of 95
Analysis of Singly reinforced Flanged Beams
Involves T-sections & L-sections in Beam-supported slab floor system
Flanged beams have 2 parts
o Web: The fully rectangular portion of the beam other than the over hanging parts
of slab
o Flange: The overhanging parts of slab
Flexural compressive stress distribution developed in flange is not uniform along its width
(see the figure below). To ease the analysis, this non-uniform stress distribution is replaced
by an equivalent uniform distribution (of magnitude = the peak stress in actual distribution)
over a reduced width known as “equivalent flange width” or “effective
flange width”, represented as bf.
So
As per IS 456 (Cl. 23.1.2), bf = + bw + 6Df (for T-beams)
6
So
= + bw + 3Df (for L-beams)
12
where lo = effective distance between points of zero moments in beam
bw = breadth of web
Analysis:
Case 1: Neutral axis lies within flange, i.e., Xu ≤ Df
Since all concrete on the tension side is considered ineffective, the T-beam
may be analysed as a rectangular beam of width bf and effective depth d.
Compressive force in Concrete C = 0.36 fck bf xu
Tensile force in steel T = 0.87 fy Ast
Depth of neutral axis Xu is obtained from C = T, as:
Xu = 0.87 fy Ast
0.36 fck b
F
Subcase 2(a): If Xu ≥ Df
where I is the second moment of area of the section about the neutral axis, Q the first moment of
area about the Neutral Axis of the portion of the section above the layer at distance y from the NA,
and b is the width of the beam at the layer at which Ƭ is calculated.
The combined flexural and shear stresses on that element can be resolved into equivalent
principal stresses f1 and f2 acting on orthogonal planes.
As a result, the stress on the beam is depicted in terms of the principal stress trajectories as shown.
In a material like concrete which is weak in tension, tensile cracks would develop in a direction that
is perpendicular to that of the principal tensile stress. Thus the compressive stress trajectories in
the above figure indicate potential crack patterns, as shown below.
MODES OF CRACKING
1) Flexural cracks
Occurs in reinforced concrete beams of usual proportions, subjected to relatively high
flexural stresses fx and low shear stresses Ƭ.
Maximum principal tensile stress occurs in the outer fibre at the bottom face of the concrete
beam at the peak moment locations. As a result, cracks are formed, which are termed as
flexural cracks.
These are formed at 90o from the extreme tension fibre towards neutral axis.
These are controlled by the tension bars.
3) Flexure-Shear cracks
When a ‘flexural crack’ occurs in combination with a ‘diagonal tension crack’, the crack is
termed as a flexure-shear crack.
Occurs in beam subjected to both flexure and shear.
Note: The presence of shear stress reduces the strength of concrete in compression as well
as tension. Accordingly, the tensile strength of the concrete in a reinforced concrete beam
subjected to both flexure & shear will be less than that subjected to flexure only.
Here, flexural crack usually forms first, and extends into a diagonal tension crack.
where Vu is the factored shear force at the section under consideration, b is the width of the
beam (taken as the web width bw in flanged beams), and d the effective depth of the section.
In the case of members with varying depth, the nominal shear stress, defined above,
needs to be modified, to account for the contribution of the vertical component of the flexural
tensile force Tu which is inclined at an angle β to the longitudinal direction.
Accordingly, the nominal shear stress (Cl. 40.1.1 of the Code), is obtained as
where Vu and Mu are the applied factored shear force and bending moment at the section
under consideration. The negative sign applies where Mu increases in the same direction as
the depth increases and the positive sign applies where Mu decreases in this direction, as
shown below.
2) Critical Sections for shear
Location of critical sections for different cases are shown below. [Refer Cl. 22.6.2]
Shear reinforcement, also known as web reinforcement may consist of any one of the
following systems (Cl. 40.4 of the Code)
a) stirrups perpendicular to the beam axis;
b) stirrups inclined (at 45° or more) to the beam axis; and
c) longitudinal bars bent-up (usually, not more than two at a time) at 45° to 60° to the beam
axis, combined with stirrups.
By far, the most common type of shear reinforcement is the two-legged stirrup, comprising a
closed or open loop, with its ends anchored properly around longitudinal bars/stirrup holders
(to develop the yield strength in tension). It is placed perpendicular to the member axis
(‘vertical stirrup’), and may or may not be combined with bent-up bars.
Where bent-up bars are provided, their contribution towards shear resistance shall not be
more than half that of the total shear reinforcement.
5) Limiting Ultimate Shear Strength of beam (Ƭc,max)
The nominal shear stress (Ƭv) on the beam should not exceed the limiting total shear
strength of beam including shear reinforcement (Ƭc,max).
Such a limit is set to the shear stress in beam Ƭv because : if the shear reinforcement
provided in the section is excessive, failure may occur by crushing of concrete (known as
shear-compression failure which occurs due to crushing of the reduced concrete section after
formation of flexure-shear crack) , even before yielding of shear reinforcements. Since this is
a brittle fracture, such a failure is undesirable.
Thus by limiting the shear stress in beam Ƭv to less than Ƭc,max, shear-compression
failures can be prevented.
Values of Ƭc,max is given in Table 20 of IS456. It may also be obtained from the following
approximate relation.
Ƭc,max ≈ 0.62 ƒ𝐬ck
In the case of solid slabs, the Code (Cl. [Link]) specifies that Ƭv should not exceed
0.5 Ƭc,max .
A =n ( φ
From above equation, the required spacing sv of ‘vertical stirrups’ for a
selected diameter φ is given by:
Page 61 of 95
Page 62 of 95
Page 63 of 95
Page 64 of 95
Page 65 of 95
DESIGN FOR BOND
The ‘theoretical cut-off point’ for a bar in a flexural member is that point beyond which it is
(theoretically) no longer needed to resist the design moment.
Codal provisions:
Tension steel required at any section must be extended beyond the
theoretical cutoff point by a distance = 12 x Bar Diameter.
Bond stress : Development of tangential (shear) stress components along the interface
(contact surface) between the reinforcing bar and the surrounding concrete. The stress
so developed at the interface is called bond stress, and is expressed in terms of the
tangential force per unit nominal surface area of the reinforcing bar.
In general, bond strength is enhanced when the following measures are adopted:
o deformed (ribbed) bars are used instead of plain bars;
o smaller bar diameters are used;
o higher grade of concrete (improved tensile strength) is used;
o increased cover is provided around each bar;
o increased length of embedment, bends and /or hooks are provided;
o mechanical anchorages are employed;
o stirrups with increased area, reduced spacing and/or higher grade of steel are
used;
o termination of longitudinal reinforcement in tension zones is avoided;
o any measure that will increase the confinement of the concrete around the bar is
employed.
There are two types of loading situations which induce bond stresses, and accordingly
‘bond’ is characterized as:
Flexural bond stress / Local Bond stress is that which arises in flexural members
on account of shear or a variation in bending moment. Evidently, flexural bond is
critical at points where the shear (V= dM/dx) is significant.
where Σo is the total perimeter of the bars at the beam section under
consideration, and z is lever arm.
o Actual flexural bond stress is affected by Flexural cracking, local slipping and
splitting, which are not taken care of by the above equation.
Anchorage bond stress / Development bond stress is stress developed in steel
reinforcement bars at the extreme ends or at cutoff points. See the following
example, where steel bar is provided on the tension side of a cantilever beam.
o The steel bar in the beam is designed based on the maximum bending moment in the
beam that occurs at section D. Since the bar is under tensile stress fs, it should not
be terminated at D, but extended further to section C, such that the bond stress
between concrete and the additional length of bar L resists the tensile stress fs in
the bar. Therefore, average anchorage bond stress ua
where τbd is the ‘design bond stress’, which is the permissible value of the average
anchorage bond stress ua, and fs = 0.87fy
τbd values for plain bars in tension are given in Cl. [Link].
τbd values are increased by 60%, for deformed bars.
τbd values are increased by 25%, for bars in compression.
o However, when the required bar embedment cannot be conveniently provided due to
practical difficulties, bends, hooks and mechanical anchorages can be used. [Refer
Cl. 26.2.2]
Bends:
The anchorage value (or the equivalent anchorage length) of a
bend shall be taken as 4 times the diameter of the bar for each 45 o
bend.
Maximum anchorage value of a bend = 16φ
A ‘standard 90o bend’ has anchorage value = 8φ (including a
minimum extension of 4φ.)
Hooks:
When the bend is turned around 180o, it has anchorage value = 16φ
(including a minimum extension of 4φ), it is called a standard U-type
hook.
The minimum internal turning radius (r) specified for a hook =
o 2φ for plain mild steel bars
o 4φ for cold-worked deformed bars
Hooks are generally considered mandatory for plain bars in tension
Note: Bends and hooks introduce bearing stress in the concrete that they bear against. To ensure
that these bearing stresses are not excessive, the turning radius r should be sufficiently large. The
Code (Cl. [Link]) recommends a check on the bearing stress fb inside any bend or
hook, calculated as follows:
where Fbt is the design tensile force in the bar, r is the internal radius of the bend, and φ is the
bar diameter. Bearing stress fb should be less than the limiting value stipulated in the code.
Mechanical anchorages:
o Mechanical anchorages in the form of welded plates, nuts and
bolts, etc. can be used, provided they are capable of developing
the strength of the bar without damage to concrete (to be
ascertained through tests).
SPLICING OF REINFORCEMENTS
Splices are required when
o bars required are longer than available lengths, and hence needs to be extended.
o the bar diameter has to be changed along the length.
The purpose of ‘splicing’ is to transfer effectively the axial force from the terminating bar to
the connecting (continuing) bar. This invariably introduces stress concentrations in the
surrounding concrete.
As per IS456,
o splices in flexural members should not be at sections where the bending moment is
more than 50 percent of the moment of resistance
o not more than half the bars shall be spliced at a section”
There are 3 ways of splicing of bars:
o Lap Splices [Refer Cl. [Link]]
Only for bars of dia φ ≤ 36 mm
Lap length L =
≥ Ld or 24 φ, for bars in compression
≥ 2Ld or 30 φ, for bars in tension