1

Structure and Cohesion in Inclusion Based Educational Classrooms

Name

Institution

Course

Professor

Date
 2

Contents
Chapter 1.....................................................................................................................................................3
Background..............................................................................................................................................3
Historical Overview..............................................................................................................................4
Society at Large...................................................................................................................................4
Theoretical background.......................................................................................................................4
Problem Statement.................................................................................................................................5
Purpose Statement..................................................................................................................................6
Significance of the Study.........................................................................................................................7
Research Questions.................................................................................................................................7
Chapter 2.....................................................................................................................................................8
Conceptual or Theoretical Framework....................................................................................................8
Related Literature....................................................................................................................................9
Summary...............................................................................................................................................22
CHAPTER 3.................................................................................................................................................23
Research Design....................................................................................................................................23
Research Questions...............................................................................................................................24
Hypothesis of the Study.........................................................................................................................24
Participants and Settings.......................................................................................................................24
Population.............................................................................................................................................24
Participants............................................................................................................................................24
Data Collection......................................................................................................................................25
Instrumentation.................................................................................................................................25
Procedures.........................................................................................................................................25
Data Analysis.........................................................................................................................................26
CHAPTER 4.................................................................................................................................................27
Research Question.................................................................................................................................27
Null Hypothesis......................................................................................................................................27
Results...................................................................................................................................................28
Chapter 5...................................................................................................................................................29
Discussion..............................................................................................................................................29
Implications...........................................................................................................................................30
 3

Recommendations for Future Research................................................................................................30

References.................................................................................................................................................32
 4

Structure and Cohesion in Inclusion Based Educational Classrooms

Chapter 1

The modern educational system is designed to cater to a wide range of students with a wide

range of needs and requirements. There are many different styles of teaching and learning which

can be used to help students to learn and gain knowledge from the materials being presented.

One such style of learning is the inclusion-based model, which aims to provide an equal

opportunity for all students to access the materials being presented regardless of their learning

styles, learning disabilities, or other challenges they may be faced. This style of learning aims to

provide the best possible educational experience for all students, regardless of their background

or situation. the following research will aim to investigate the disparities in cohesion and

structure between inclusive and non-inclusive models as well as offer recommendations on how

to improve the two in the former.

Background

Inclusive education is the practice of allowing kids with special needs to attend school in the

same classroom as their peers who do not have special needs. This educational approach is

frequently thought to be in the best interests of both kids with exceptional needs and their peers

who do not have special needs. The purpose of inclusive education is to provide all students with

an education that is as similar to a traditional classroom as feasible in order to provide them with

the best education possible (Otukile-Mongwaketse, 2018). Depending on the requirements of the

kids in the classroom, inclusive education can take many various shapes. In the types of

classrooms outlined above, several strategies, such as Appreciative Inquiry (AI), can be utilized

to increase coherence and structure (Yang, 2021).

 5

Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is a positive psychology paradigm that teaches people how to

recognize their own strengths and gain confidence in their talents. It is used to motivate human

development and improve the lives of a certain set of individuals. The strategy assists people in

recognizing the good things they do, the good things they have previously accomplished, and the

good things others do and have (Bergmark & Kostenius, 2018). Professionals utilize it as a

technique and a mentality to improve the quality of the learning experience at various levels.

Historical Overview

In the United States, the non-inclusive classroom model has been the norm for many years.

Students with disabilities were often separated from their peers in non-inclusive classrooms and

received specialized teaching in a separate classroom or program (Welter, 2021). The assumption

behind this strategy was that students with impairments could not study in the same environment

as their peers. As a result, the model saw pupils with impairments as inferior and potentially

harmful to other kids' development (Mackes et al., 2020). In the United States, the inclusive

classroom concept is the current craze. Pupils with disabilities are supported and accommodated

in inclusive classrooms, which are designed to fulfill the needs of all students. This strategy is

built on the philosophy that all kids can learn if given the right assistance (Kantavong, 2018).

The approach was developed in response to the shortcomings of the non-inclusive classroom

model in the early 1990s.

Society at Large

The inclusion of pupils with impairments in regular classes has long been a contentious issue.

While inclusiveness is a great idea, many people's perceptions of it are based on false

information (Schapals, 2018). When it comes to learning, there is a common misconception that

the more people that are in the classroom, the better the education will be for all students. This
 6

could not be further from the truth. It is, in reality, the polar opposite. There has been rising

pressure on society to recognize the benefits of inclusion, not only for disabled children but for

the entire school (DeMatthews et al., 2021). Inclusion classrooms have been found to improve

mental health, expedite learning for all children, reduce discipline issues, raise academic

achievement, and reduce social isolation. Because of the numerous advantages of inclusion,

some schools have discontinued separate special education programs (Krämer, 2021). As a

result, teachers are able to deliver more one-on-one education to students and create a more

individualized learning environment.

Theoretical background

Theories about inclusive education have contributed to a better understanding of the mechanisms

that make inclusive education work. As a result, improving outcomes for all children and

teenagers is easy. There are five key theories behind inclusive education. First and foremost,

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a paradigm for creating learning environments that are

accessible to all students, regardless of their ability or impairment (Gidden, 2021). UDL

principles include providing multiple modes of representation, expression, and interaction, to

ensure that all students have access to the curriculum. UDL has been found to improve academic

attainment for kids of all abilities, including those with disabilities. Its ideas can be used in both

general and special education settings, as well as in the development of tailored Instruction for

each student.

Differentiated Instruction is a theory that focuses on meeting the needs of individual students in

the classroom. It entails adapting instructional methods and resources to meet the requirements

of all students, including disabled pupils. All pupils, even those with disabilities, have shown that

this strategy is helpful in raising academic achievement. It can be utilized in both regular and
 7

special education settings, and it can be tailored to each student's needs. The Positive Behavioral

Interventions(PBIS) and support framework, which focuses on building a positive school climate

and reducing problem behaviors, is another important framework that informs the following

Study (Horner & Monzalve-Macaya, 2018). It focuses on instilling positive behavior in kids and

rewarding them for doing so. All kids, including those with disabilities, have been demonstrated

to benefit from PBIS in terms of lowering problem behaviors and enhancing academic

attainment. It can be utilized in both regular and special education settings, and it can be tailored

to each student's needs.

For kids who are struggling academically, Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered

strategy for assessment and intervention. It entails identifying pupils who may have learning

issues, providing intervention and assistance to those who require it, and tracking their progress.

RTI has been proved to be helpful in identifying kids who are having academic difficulties and

giving them intervention and support. The framework, like the PBIS, can be utilized in both

general and special education settings, and it can be tailored to each student's requirements.

Individualized Education Programs(IEPs) is the last theory. IEPs are written documents that

detail a student's specific educational requirements (Paul, 2022). They are created through a

collaborative process involving parents, educators, and other experts and are tailored to each

student's specific requirements. IEPs have been proved to be successful in providing students

with disabilities with the specialized Instruction they require to achieve their academic

objectives.

Problem Statement

Inclusion aims to foster a sense of belonging in which all viewpoints are acknowledged and

respected. The paradigm is built on the idea that all children, regardless of aptitude or disability,
 8

should be involved in the classroom. On the other side, cohesion is the glue that ties a

community together. Both coherence and structure are required for inclusion to be successful

(Stites et al., 2018). Scholarly theories and other studies on inclusion in educational settings have

helped to make its implementation a huge success. However, the new model still has flaws in

areas such as cohesion and structure.

The main issue with educational inclusion is that it is a new trend that will take time to develop.

There are a few challenges that occur when it comes to educational inclusion. When all kids are

treated the same, it can be difficult to build a cohesive and structured classroom (Dobia, 2019).

Another concern is that some students may feel unfairly treated if they are not afforded the same

opportunities as their peers. This could have a negative impact on the amount of togetherness in

the classroom. Inclusivity in education is still a new paradigm, and it's critical to keep

researching and perfecting it so that it can be a success for all kids. Comparing the model to its

predecessor, the non-inclusive model is useful not just for highlighting its flaws but also for

incorporating the latter's merits into the former. The appreciative inquiry will be used in the

following study to look into the differences between inclusive and non-inclusive educational

classrooms.

Purpose Statement

The purpose of this essay is to examine and evaluate inclusion and exclusion in education from

the standpoint of all students. A wide range of scenarios, as well as institutional and

organizational levels, will be considered in the study. As a result, it will use quantitative analysis

(one-way Anova) to look into a variety of topics. First, consider the differences, if any, between

inclusive and non-inclusive educational environments. In addition, the research will look into

how Appreciative Inquiry (AI) may be utilized to strengthen cohesiveness and structure in
 9

inclusion-based educational settings. The study will be defined by three variables: structure,

cohesion, and inclusion-based educational classes. The research will ascribe to two hypotheses in

regard to the study's two main goals. To begin with, there should be no significant difference in

cohesion between inclusive and non-inclusive educational settings. In addition, there should be

little structural difference between the two classroom models.

Significance of the Study

Inclusive education is an educational model that aims to provide an environment where all

children are welcome regardless of their abilities and backgrounds. Inclusive education is often

considered to be the best approach to education for young people with special educational needs

(SEN) because it aims to reduce the gap between learners instead of segregating students based

on their needs. Inclusive education is often praised for its commitment to diversity, equality, and

social justice, but it also has another major benefit: it promotes better cohesion among students.

This cohesion is achieved through a variety of mechanisms, but one of the most powerful is

research.

Therefore, a study into the improvement of cohesion and structure in inclusive and non-inclusive

educational models is significant for several reasons. First, it can help educators and

administrators make informed decisions about the structure of their educational institutions.

Second, it can help researchers better understand how students learn and interact in different

educational models. Additionally, it can help policymakers develop policies that support

inclusive education.

Research Questions

 RQ1: Do inclusion-based classrooms differ significantly from non-inclusive classrooms in terms

of structure?
 10

 RQ2: Is there a significant difference in classroom cohesion between inclusive and non-inclusive

classrooms?

Chapter 2

Conceptual or Theoretical Framework

The Salamanca Declaration (UNESCO, 1994) has been recognized as the major breakthrough for

inclusive education. Special needs education was to be replaced with inclusive education, which

meant that segregated educational solutions would be eliminated, and the general classroom

would be more open to variety. Some issues with inclusive education have been identified,

including a lack of knowledge about how to create truly inclusive classrooms, the persistence of

segregated educational practices, and the diverse opinions among teachers and parents about its

appropriateness. It appears that these issues are still present to a large extent. A previous

evaluation also mentioned a lack of information about how to construct inclusive classrooms that

include all students.

Furthermore, a substantial quantity of research in the theme number indicates that knowledge

about whether education systems are becoming more inclusive is still inadequate, and there are

still differing views among parents and teachers about the applicability of inclusive education.

As a result, there appears to be a need to investigate why there has been so little progress in

terms of cohesiveness in inclusion-based educational approaches. There is evidence that

cohesion in inclusion-based models is similar to that of non-inclusion-based models. Many

researchers have found that there was no significant difference in the cohesion of inclusive and

non-inclusive schools. These studies suggest that cohesive social networks are not reliant on

whether or not students are included in general education classes. Rather, the key factor in
 11

promoting cohesion is the existence of positive relationships among all members of the school

community.

There are significant results on how to accommodate students with disabilities in mainstream

classes, but the research is still generally presented from a special needs viewpoint, with a focus

on students with disabilities or special needs. There are few studies that indicate how inclusive

settings encompassing all students may be produced in practice in a methodologically credible

way. The demand for such research is critical for two reasons. To begin with, the concept of

inclusion entails a shift in behavior. Second, demonstrating that inclusive practices can be

implemented is arguably the most compelling justification for an inclusive education system. As

a result, it appears to be a better moment than ever to investigate theoretical reasons for their

potential to affect practice. However, it should be highlighted that some evaluations have

attempted to incorporate research that concentrates more directly on how more inclusive settings

engaging all students may be developed and maintained in practice.

Related Literature

The European Agency for Statistics on Inclusive Education (EASIE) collects and analyzes long-

term, comparative national statistics on inclusive education systems and learners with legally

recognized special educational needs (SEN) in its 31 member nations. In an essay published in

2020 by Ramberg & Watkins, the EASIE project is discussed in relation to the basic concepts of

presence, placement, participation, and development in inclusive education systems. The EASIE

study's findings highlight differences and disparities in how nations respond to different types of

learners (Ramberg & Watkins, 2020). The discrepancies in the data demonstrate that the

deployment of various models and variations of inclusive and non-inclusive models has a direct

impact on cohesion. The findings will have a significant impact on the research's techniques and
 12

analysis, as well as its conclusions. Furthermore, if necessary, the statistical data in the

publication may be utilized to supplement the data used in the next investigation.

Lawson's paper, 2020, argues for the academic field of Disability Law to be enhanced and makes

recommendations for its future growth. It argues that there is a need for more cohesion among

those who already use a critical disability perspective in disciplines such as Social Care and

Protection Law and Equality Law, as well as greater mainstreaming of this approach across the

entire breadth of sociologic scholarship (Lawson, 2020). The article is divided into three parts.

The first examines how Disability Law connects with other legal disciplines and bodies of

knowledge in order to put it into context. The scope and organization of the project are covered

next. The third part establishes a foundation for future Disability Law research by identifying

four major cross-cutting issues that have the potential to bring together researchers with expertise

in a variety of subject areas (Lawson, 2020). Understanding disability legislation is critical for

evaluating how the inclusive system affects impaired people's well-being. As a consequence, it

will be crucial in addressing the issues that sparked this research.

Advances and innovations in the field of disability and its supports have culminated in a

transformation in the way disability is perceived during the previous few decades. Such

improvements, which also included a person-environment fit model of impairment, have

apparent consequences for disability assistance and study, according to Mpofu, 2022. The

chapter dives into what inclusive education means in an African context and proposes a good

model for inclusive education schools in urban neighborhoods based on the African ideology of

Ubuntu. More attention has to be paid to the relationship between individuals with disabilities

and the surroundings in which they live, according to the above-mentioned conceptualizations

(Mpofu, 2022). As a result, there has been a greater focus on persons with disabilities rights to be
 13

fully integrated into their communities, as well as the value of self-determination, involvement,

and quality of life. This emphasizes the significance of inclusive education in developing

learning environments for children with impairments.

Since UNESCO's Salamanca Declaration in 1994, inclusive education has gradually gained

attention in worldwide debates over education policy, according to Mezzanotte, 2022. While

there is considerable evidence that inclusive education reforms can improve the academic and

personal results of diverse students – particularly students with special education needs – there is

little information on the economic viability of such reforms. This paper evaluates the existing

evidence on the possible advantages and costs of inclusive education reforms, starting with the

literature on the correlations between education and individual life outcomes (Mezzanote, 2022).

Female and male students; and LGBTQI students. It focuses on the personal and societal costs of

these students' low academic, social, and emotional results, as well as the socioeconomic

expenses they impose on society (Mezzanote, 2022). The study also includes research on the

effects of inclusive education changes on various student groups where available. The research

will contribute to understanding several key aspects of the proposed study.

The worldwide trend toward establishing inclusive systems has pushed national governments to

implement policies that promote high-quality education for all. Portugal introduced novel

educational policies in the fields of inclusive education in 2017–18, according to Alves, 2019, in

an attempt to combine school values, curriculum, and pedagogies. This article addresses the

improvements proposed by this wave of educational policy reform, emphasizing the significance

of vigorous continuous professional development for mainstream teachers in order to help them

become more reflective and inclusive practitioners (Alves, 2019). The study explores the 'policy

ecology,' and the actions used to bring about change in Portuguese schools, using two change
 14

models. The policies have prioritized the establishment of schools where all children are

welcomed, able to participate and succeed. While this wave of policy reform has depended on

both formal and non-formal teacher education, there is a risk that superficial methods may fail to

assist teachers in their efforts to change (Alves, 2019). The essay contributes to the research by

referencing efforts to promote cohesion in inclusive schools.

Gene-environment dynamics, Holden et al., 2021, demonstrates how genes and environments

interact to affect children in schools. A gene-by-environment interaction is one sort of gene-

environment process that has been widely explored utilizing behavioral genetics methodologies.

When the influence of their context differs depending on genes, or vice versa, when the effect of

genes differs depending on individual context, a gene-by-environment interaction is visible

(Holden et al., 2021). Many diverse contexts under the gene-by-environment interaction model

have been explored by developmental-behavioral geneticists interested in children's school

accomplishments, including settings measured from within children's home and school

environments. However, because this research has primarily concentrated on White children,

society now possesses scientific knowledge that is not representative of the entire population

(Holden et al., 2021). When we apply non-inclusive scientific data to racialized populations, this

might have negative consequences. The study finishes with a request for more racialized

youngsters to be included in research samples. Holden et al. provide information on sample

selection for prospective research and argue for its diversity.

2020 inclusion throughout educational environments is necessary, according to Gilson et al., to

respect and inspire the full potential of persons with intellectual and developmental impairments

(IDD). Peers and teachers are crucial partners in establishing an inclusive campus culture

throughout the early phases of a postsecondary education program's growth (Gilson et al., 2020).
 15

We performed a campus-wide survey of 1,867 professors and students at a big public institution

to assess their opinions on inclusion in student life and their attitudes toward potential students

with IDD. To synthesize these viewpoints, we used a mixed-methods approach that included

correlations, linear regression, and qualitative analysis of open-ended replies (Gilson et al.,

2020). The article makes research and practice suggestions targeted at expanding possibilities for

students with IDD and their peers on college campuses. The study will benefit greatly from this

research since it provides insight into various tactics and the impact of combining them.

The focus of Meijer & Watkin's 2019 research is on examining the transition from special needs

to inclusive education. Funding of special needs and inclusive education is at the heart of this

statement (Meijer & Watkin's 2019). The paper will look at how the essential problem of

financing has altered – or not – in different European countries since Salamanca. This study

compares and contrasts important difficulties found in a 1999 European Agency assessment of

special education funding models in 17 European countries with those identified in a 2016 study

of ways to support inclusive education in 18 European nations (Meijer & Watkin's 2019).

Changing inclusive education finance arrangements is a key lever for many European nations in

achieving the Salamanca Statement's goal of increasing universal inclusion of learners with

special educational needs.

Palla and Roth's 2020 research intends to emphasize didactical voices on inclusive ideals and

specific educational tools identified in 178 preschool teachers' written comments from 10

Swedish municipalities. The research questions are as follows: How can preschool teachers

communicate inclusive principles in written comments on language and communication

education in preschools? Which educational tools appear in the written comments on teaching

language and communication in preschool, and how are these tools claimed to be used? The
 16

topic was investigated utilizing multi-voiced didactic modeling and didactical tact as a

theoretical foundation (Palla and Roth's 2020). The findings show that throughout the literature

analyzed; there are didactic voices on inclusion. The Instruction appears to be founded on

inclusive principles, with all children engaging, being included, and being a part of the group.

There are a few statements that have a stronger personality. According to our interpretation, the

"special" educational tools that are brought to the fore are presented and used in a comprehensive

manner and are didactically molded into more general, rather than specialized, instruments.

Magauova's, 2020 paper addresses foreign scientists' work methodologies and approaches with

children with unique educational requirements. Generalization of experience, scientific and

theoretical analysis and a competence-based approach were all utilized in the research technique.

Collaborative learning, reaction to intervention (RTI), a three-stage interview, the Diamond

Model of Social Pedagogy, and other models and methodologies were examined (Magauova's,

2020). The Republic of Kazakhstan's experience with its implementation and assessment in the

educational process was summarized. The authors present instructors' experiences in educating

students with special educational needs in various Kazakhstani institutions, based on the

application of methods and models.

Research by Nemek1 & Wittmannová, 2021 sought to assess and compare the views of non-

inclusive high school students on inclusive physical education by gender. The research adds to

our knowledge of students' attitudes about people with physical and mental disabilities. The

study enlisted the participation of 181 able-bodied high school students (56 males and 125 girls)

from one non-inclusive high school in Bratislava, Slovakia (Nemek1 & Wittmannová, 2021).

Girls exhibited higher favorable attitudes about inclusive physical education in terms of goal

attainment, motivation, and motor skill acquisition (IPE).

 17

Boys showed a greater degree of positive views among students with disabilities' self-confidence

after participating in IPE. In pupils with intellectual impairments, girls reported a substantially

greater favorable attitude toward IPE (U = 2817, p = 0.029, r = 0.168) than males (Nemek1 &

Wittmannová, 2021). The most positive attitude toward IPE was expressed by both genders as a

consequence of societal integration, whereas the least positive attitude was shown as a result of

motor skill gain. IPE has been endorsed by Slovak students from a non-inclusive high school as a

technique of integrating pupils with physical and intellectual disabilities.

According to Qu, 2019, despite the stated global inclusion aim, there are still gaps in the

translation of conceptual support for inclusive education into effective teaching methods.

Support for segregated schools based on the positivist medical model of disability continues to

oppose inclusive education for children with special educational needs and/or impairments based

on social and rights-based models. Conflicts over inclusion or exclusion typically follow these

two polarizing paradigms, which must be confronted front on if conflicts are to be resolved (Qu,

2019). This theoretical discussion piece uses the critical realism stratified ontology framework to

bring fresh insights and clarity into special and inclusive education. The findings indicate the

disability and inclusive education paradigms based on three-dimensional critical realism. The

purpose is to provide theoretical foundations for linking the medical and social models (Qu,

2019). This might help to explain the disparities and inconsistencies in attitudes and actions

towards educational exclusion and inclusion. The conclusion states that medical and social

model viewpoints may share philosophical ground and that experts from many fields can and

must work to advance various levels of children's best interests.

A large body of empirical research from conventional school settings shows that academic

success and academic self-concept of ability (ASC) have reciprocal effects. SEN-L pupils attend
 18

special schools and are fully separated from regular students in exclusive settings. SEN-L

students in inclusive settings, on the other hand, attend regular schools and are educated in

classes with other students (Gorges et al., 2018). SEN-L students are neither graded nor

instructed based on individual learning goals in either setting, which could alter reciprocal effects

between the two sections of the study. Furthermore, because SEN-L students' performance is

strongly based on individual reference standards, the researchers looked at SEN-L students'

individual performance growth as a predictor of academic self-concept of ability (Gorges et al.,

2018). Cross-lagged effects and an effect of performance growth on ASC in exclusive settings

were discovered in a longitudinal sample spanning 3rd and 4th grade. Individualized teaching,

grades, peer groups, and individual vs societal reference standards are discussed as well as

practical implications for reciprocal impacts between ASC and performance (Gorges et al.,

2018). The essay will make a significant contribution to the study and provide information on the

technique employed.

Another important piece of research is a quasi-experimental study that looked at 15 pairs of

children with severe support needs who were matched across 12 variables based on their first

complete Individualized Education Program (IEP) in the school district (Gonzalez et al., 2020).

From their initial IEP through the most recent IEP at the time of the research, one kid in each

pair was in general education for 80% or more of the day. The second youngster in the pair was

put in a separate special education class and attended from the beginning to the end of his IEP.

Over the course of a normal school day, all of the students were watched, with time-sampling

data collected on the sorts of activities, settings, and forms of interaction that occurred (Gonzalez
 19

et al., 2020). In addition, result data was studied across three variables: communication levels,

literacy levels, and numeracy levels, from the first IEP through the most recent IEP in the

district. On numerous characteristics, children in general education courses had a substantial, big

impact size when compared to their partners in separate classrooms, according to the findings.

Additionally, as compared to children in segregated classrooms, kids in general education

courses made significantly more development. Placement, disability features, progress, and

policy implications are explored.

The literature compares and contrasts the Swedish and German educational systems, with an

emphasis on the implementation of inclusive education. The structure of the two systems, how

categorization procedures function, inclusion financing, and teaching strategies for achieving

inclusion in the classroom are all investigated. The research is based on steering papers and

journal articles (Sansour and Bernard 2018). The literature compares and contrasts the Swedish

and German educational systems, with an emphasis on the implementation of inclusive

education. The structure of the two systems, how categorization procedures function, inclusion

financing, and teaching strategies for achieving inclusion in the classroom are all investigated.

The research is based on steering papers and journal articles. Sansour and Bernard (2018),

demonstrate a different view of how to support children with learning disabilities due to the

traditions of the two educational systems, despite the fact that a systematic comparison is not

possible. The classification procedures and finance models are linked to the many means of

delivering inclusive education. In both countries, inclusive education necessitates collaboration

across various professions. The separation of children with unique educational needs, whether in

the form of special schools or special classes, remains a reality in both countries. The
 20

contributions of the analytical findings are examined, and they have an impact on the approach

utilized in this study.

The number of disabled students enrolled in higher education institutions is rising in line with

global anti-discrimination legislation and inclusive education policy (Mckinney et al., 2020).

Disabled students were previously denied access to higher education. Currently, higher education

institutions must have disability statements and policies in place, as well as provide assistance to

impaired students. Despite this growing trend, disabled students remain significantly

underrepresented in higher education and face a variety of hurdles. The literature looks into the

experiences of impaired students in higher education in South Africa. The results of the

qualitative exploratory investigation show how the emergence of handicaps (acquired or

congenital) affects their integrating experiences. It focuses on participants' experiences accepting

newly acquired disabilities and the impact this has on their ability to complete the study, as well

as their experiences with disability disclosure and opportunities to choose and enroll in desired

subjects and courses at higher education institutions (McKinney et al., 2020).

Despite having a substantial impact on higher school performance, many impaired individuals

find high school education difficult to get (Ressa, 2021). The qualitative study investigates the

perspectives of eight carefully sampled US undergraduate disadvantaged students on the impact

of school time on high school education. According to Ressa (2021), the conflicts between the

school calendar and their impairment resulted in a hidden time curriculum that hampered their

pursuit of postsecondary education goals, according to the stories. In order to achieve genuine
 21

inclusion of impaired kids, it is necessary to address the hidden curriculum of time inside the

school time frame.

The paper by Kozibroda et al., 2020 conducted a meta-analysis of the studies on inclusive

education practice and innovations in schools. Since the 1990s, when the necessity to adopt

inclusion techniques and concepts at the worldwide level was identified, researchers have been

focusing more on the implementation of inclusive education in schools. Until the 2000s, the

initial research on inclusive education focused on attitudes and values as a factor impacting the

success of inclusion and inclusive education practices (Kozibroda et al., 2020). Following the

2000s, investigations shifted to a more focused subject matter of research at the local level in

various countries: principals' beliefs, educators' self-efficacy, the role of parental guidance,

school ideology, models of inclusion in private schools, and the severity of disability as a factor

that determines teachers' beliefs about inclusion.

As a result of adopting inclusion, several inclusive models have emerged. The integrated and

differentiated methods to inclusion integration have been recognized as two significant effective

techniques. In an integrated approach, innovative ideas in inclusive education are introduced in

the following components of the educational system: the concept (strategy) that describes the

framework, external preconditions, and phases of integration; a school that outlines the internal

preconditions for inclusion; and a community that defines the external prerequisites for inclusion

(Kozibroda et al., 2020). In order to find the internal conditions for inclusion, a differentiated

method is employed in conjunction with an integrated approach: instructors' values, beliefs, and

attitudes, and educators' competency.

According to Cornwall, 2018 choice, opportunity, and learning all necessitate a close

examination of current events and political concerns. Recognizing the need for choice,
 22

opportunity, and enhanced learning activities to accommodate for the diversity of children in the

system is actually supportive of the process of providing a high-quality education for all

(Cornwall, 2018). The article identifies a number of particular aspects related to the structure and

organization of the educational system for students who are physically or movement

handicapped. Due to the needs of remedial techniques and segregated professional skills, the

Under 5's service for physically challenged children is notably 'polarized' into exclusive and

inclusive (Cornwall, 2018). The experts who deal with the education and welfare of physically

challenged young people have been given a lot of responsibility for implementing the

development of educational and social systems. Integrating knowledge of the two key parts of

Cornwall's study will aid in drawing practical conclusions and, as a result, increase the efficacy

of the research's recommendations.

Social exclusions come in many shapes and sizes. Combating exclusion, on the other hand, is

akin to formulating policy. Wandera (2019) conducted a research to highlight progress on

inclusive education by addressing policy aspects in exclusions and inclusiveness as its major

goal, based on the breadth of policy formation and implementation in higher education. The

study relied on ideas such as self-directed learning and Herbert Simon's social learning theory,

often known as the social discourse theory. The study was exploratory in nature, with case

studies from worldwide trends serving as a standard for its breadth. The lessons are drawn from

survey cases of countries that have been used as a basis for policy analysis, planning,

implementation, and adoption in other countries. Investigating the development of inclusion-

based learning allows it to be successfully compared to other models and the contrasts between

them to be emphasized.
 23

This study looked at the opinions and experiences of disabled students at a certain university.

The study gives the viewpoints of impaired student volunteers with a variety of disabilities who

were recruited to share common teaching and assessment experiences (Fuller, 2004). Four group

interviews were done before the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) section IV took effect, in

which disabled students were invited to report their experiences as students at the case study

university (Fuller, 2004). Students highlighted issues linked to information availability and use

as being crucial to their learning experience, in addition to teaching and evaluation. Future study

should take a more comprehensive approach to understanding handicapped students' learning

experiences, according to the authors.

The case for inclusive schooling is examined in an essay by Boyle and Anderson, 2020 while

taking in mind the greater international context. Separate educational provision has become more

frequent in several countries, including Australia (Boyle & Anderson, 2020). The demand for

non-inclusive environments is rising, and inclusive education has reached a standstill. The three

main components of the case for and against inclusive education are pedagogical, social, and

economic arguments (Boyle & Anderson, 2020). In Australia, there is substantial evidence that

inclusive education is warranted in these areas.

There isn't much proof that inclusive education in traditional institutions isn't advantageous to all

pupils. In fact, studies show that being completely inclusive has a financial benefit; however, this

should not be viewed as a cost-cutting strategy in the field of education but rather as an effective

resource allocation to ensure that all students, regardless of their background, receive a good

education (Boyle & Anderson, 2020). The evidence for cultural and academic benefits is

extensive, with both parents and children reporting favorable outcomes. Despite the limits of
 24

inclusive education, the benefits of inclusive learning environments are clearly demonstrated in

this essay.

Summary

After a review of literature related to inclusion-based and non-inclusion-based educational

models, there is no one answer to the question of which is better between inclusive and non-

inclusive models as it depends on the researcher's personal views. However, many researchers

view inclusive models as being more beneficial to both the research process and the final

product. Inclusive models can help to ensure that all voices are heard and that all relevant

perspectives are considered. This can lead to a more accurate and complete research study.

Additionally, inclusive models can help to build a more inclusive and diverse community of

researchers. This can be beneficial for both individual researchers and the field of research as a

whole.

It appears that, though inclusion-based models have been found to have benefits for all students,

non-inclusion models may have benefits for students with disabilities. Inclusion-based models

have been found to have a number of benefits for all students in the classroom, including

increased academic achievement, social and emotional development, and civic engagement.

Additionally, inclusion-based models have been found to have a positive impact on students with

disabilities, who often experience increased academic achievement, social and emotional

development, and civic engagement.

Non-inclusion-based models have also been found to have benefits for all students in the

classroom, including increased academic achievement, social and emotional development, and

civic engagement. Additionally, non-inclusion-based models have been found to have a positive

impact on students with disabilities, who often experience increased academic achievement,
 25

social and emotional development, and civic engagement. The difference in cohesion in the two

models is, therefore, appears to be minimal and affected by other factors, for example, the

quality of Instruction, the nature of the student population, the school's culture, and the quality of

the relationships among staff and students. As such, the benefits of inclusion-based models and

non-inclusion-based models appear to be largely similar for all students. Although literature

offers strong backing to the statement above, it is still early to make conclusions, and data from

the upcoming research will be used to make conclusions.

CHAPTER 3

The research Methodology chapter gives a clear overview of the research design

deployed for the proposed study, Improving the Structure and Cohesion in Inclusion Based

Educational Classrooms Using Appreciative Inquiry. It shows the research questions, the study's

hypothesis, sample population, participants, and the total sample size of the study. It also gives

the procedures and methods of data collection instrumentation employed to aid in collecting data

used for data analysis purposes underlined in this chapter.

Research Design

The author will use a one-way ANOVA quantitative analysis to answer two research

questions outlined in the following section. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used

to determine whether there are any statistically significant differences between the means of

three or more independent (unrelated) groups (Trunova et al., 2019). The author will conduct a

longitude quantitative survey for three months to get data used for the analysis. The major

variables in the proposed study are: Structure, Cohesion and Inclusion Based Educational

Classrooms. The independent variable is the Inclusion-based classroom, while the dependent

variables are structure and cohesion.

 26

Research Questions

RQ1: Is there a significant difference in structure in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms?

RQ2: Is there a significant difference in cohesion in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms?

Hypothesis of the Study

The null hypotheses for this study are:

H0 1: There is no significant difference in structure in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms.

H0 2: There is no significant difference in cohesion in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms.

Participants and Settings

This section clearly describes the entire population setup, the sampling technique, sample size,

and the participants in general.

Population

The population for this study will be chosen using various sampling techniques, where the

Random Sampling technique will be used to select to select three school, one that has inclusive

classroom settings, and one that do not have. Then Systematic Method of Sampling technique

will be employed to get the individuals (teachers and students) that would participate in the

study. In every school, 6-10 individuals will be chosen randomly to take part in the study.

Participants

This study will use 30 individuals, both teachers, and students, from a total of 3 random schools.

This number is based on the assumption of the medium effect size as far as the minimum value
 27

of the One-way ANOVA is exceeded. The sample will contain 20 males and 10 females, which

is flexible data upon data collection.

Data Collection

Instrumentation

In the proposed study, Survey Design Quantitative Method is used to collect the

quantitative data, which can provide direct numerical data that has its approach dictated by the

Appreciative Inquiry procedure (Nardi, 2018) during the study of the settings of the Inclusion

Based classrooms. This method is set to give feedback to the participants on what they take on

Inclusion.

Procedures

An online survey system embedded on the Survey Monkey website will aid in collecting

data from the selected participants and give data that is later analyzed to conclude. Data is then

analyzed using the SPSS tool, which will provide results that are represented using the bar and

pie charts (Gao, Yang & Li, 2018). The survey will be created by categorizing the research

questions based on specific criteria like demographics, age, gender, and other personal based

questions. Different questions are set according to the Likert scale format, ranging from strongly

disagree to agree strongly. The questions are further sub-divided into three major categories: peer

support, training, and collaboration.

These categories are designed to play various roles in the study, i.e., the collaboration

will give the results on the cohesion in multiple classrooms, as training on the other to measure

the quality of the structure used. The validity of data is done to ensure the data collected is of

high quality, and this is achieved by measuring and comparing data over long periods.
 28

Data Analysis

The collected quantitative data is categorized into three major groups for easy analysis in

the data analysis section. A comparison between existing studies is made to ascertain the

reliability of the examination before implementing the design. A descriptive analysis is provided

to give a clear picture and elaborate on the data as the data utilizes a collaborative group of

people on the data set (Asmus & Radocy, 2017). Higher median scores will show exclusively if

the hypothesis is valid or contains errors. SPSS statistical tool is used to conduct the analysis,

which gives a graphical presentation of data using charts and scales to indicate data (Gao, Yang

& Li, 2018). Errors on the variance which may have occurred during the study and especially

during the data collection stage are well explained to clear doubts on the possible outcomes of

poor results. A summary of the survey is provided with various interpretations to conclude the

study based on results from the survey.

 29

CHAPTER 4

Research Question

RQ1: Is there a significant difference in structure in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms?

RQ2: Is there a significant difference in cohesion in an inclusion-based classroom from non-

inclusive classrooms?

Null Hypothesis

H0 1: The organization of an inclusion-based classroom is similar to that of a non-inclusive

classroom.

H0 2: There is no discernible difference in cohesiveness between inclusive and non-inclusive

classes.

Descriptive Statistics.

The original questionnaire findings were input into SPSS version 19 in order to make population

inferences based on the information provided by the group. Crosstabs, relevant statistical tables,

grouped graphs, and error bar graphs were used to describe the data collected from respondents.

Hypotheses were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and Chi-Square testing. Based on data from

all participants, statistical inference is utilized to draw broad generalizations about the school's

inclusive practices. This may be accomplished in one of two ways: hypothesis testing or

computing the 95% confidence intervals for population parameters.

The Chi-Square test was used to examine if there was a significant link between two category

variables in a multiple contingency table. If the p-value is larger than 0.07, the null hypothesis is

accepted, implying that there is no association between the two variables. The alternative

hypothesis claims that the two variables have a 126 significant association, which will be
 30

accepted if the p-value is less than 0.07. The One-way ANOVA test was used to compare the

mean rating ratings of different groups of respondents. The null hypothesis indicates that the

actual mean rating ratings obtained by the groups are comparable if the p-value exceeds the 0.07

level of significance. The alternative hypothesis asserts that the mean rating ratings differ

substantially between the groups if the p-value is less than 0.07.

Results

The majority of parents recognize the value placed on a well-rounded education. They also

notably mentioned the school's social, emotional, moral, and intellectual assets. They valued the

emphasis placed on character development, as well as the inclusion preparation tools provided.

90 percent of parents said they were happy with the assessment mechanisms in place, and 79

percent said the school had a welcoming atmosphere and an open door policy. Parents see their

sons' interactions with impaired classmates as a learning opportunity as well as a life preparation.

They also believe it makes their boys more compassionate people. Only a tiny minority of

parents expressed dissatisfaction with concerns of disturbance.

The parents' perceptions of inclusion at school revealed that, on the whole, parents are aware of

the notion of inclusion. The parents' remarks were founded on inclusive ideas, such as having

children of various talents and capacities in the same classroom. It was also suggested that

children of various abilities should be able to study and play together. Equal chances, the school

being a place for everyone, tolerance of diversity, and parent participation were also mentioned

by parents as important aspects of inclusive education. Parents of impaired pupils remarked on

individualized education programs and accessibility. Five parents made a statement about

'partial' inclusion, which does not align with the principle of inclusion. This was another

observation made by parents of impaired pupils.

 31

Chapter 5

Discussion

For the development of effective inclusive practices, significant influences on attitudes,

perceptions, and instructional procedures and approaches were identified. However, based on the

findings, we may conclude that parents of handicapped kids are more likely than parents of non-

disabled students to be contacted regarding the inclusion process. This is a clear sign that not all

parents are treated equally in the educational process. Surprisingly, many pupils, even those with

disabilities, are valued and treated equally. It's likely that the effectiveness of this inclusive

education approach may be traced back to concerns of school ethos and attitudes. This research

clearly demonstrates a strong positive school attitude that values diversity and helps others.

Cohesion and structure necessitate actions such as encouraging all pupils to seek assistance from

their classmates.

There was evidence that assisting others fosters connections, and the participants' statements

reflected a respect for individual diversity. The instructors' approaches toward educating

impaired pupils matched this positive mindset. It's worth noting that the number of pupils who

disagree with the preceding statement is higher than the percentage of parents and instructors

who agree. Parents getting attention from school employees were regarded favorably by a large

number of parents, and the findings of the questionnaires revealed that parents of both

handicapped and non-disabled kids believe that implementing an open door policy improves

inclusive education.

This indicates that the school has been reformed to provide an inclusive education. It is now well

understood that parental participation is critical to impaired children' success in normal schools.
 32

In fact, based on the data obtained, it appears that the parents of impaired kids are quite

concerned about their son's education in an inclusion-based system.

Implications

Observing disability and inclusive behaviors allows for a more comprehensive view of the

people. However, because of its proclivity to withdraw into the individual's subjectivity and

physical feelings, and so to shift away from attending to the empirical elements of the damaged

individual's connection with the material world, this has limitations. Disabled children must be

treated equally to other students, but determining whether or not they are, and why their needs

and entitlements are not being addressed by our educational system, can be subjective.

While the goal of this study was to promote a fundamental reorganization of schools, the spread

of this one experience has been gradual. One may also argue that the research is constrained

since just a tiny portion of the population is being researched. Any modifications made within an

inclusive educational system must be held accountable to impaired students and their families.

Recommendations for Future Research

Based on good attitudes toward inclusive education, teaching teams developed a policy and code

of practice. When we still refer to students as having "special needs," "with the LSA," or "with a

statement of special needs," and when we refuse to allow disabled students to attend school

because they have a "statement of needs" for one-to-one support when the LSA is sick or on

special leave, or when the rest of the schools are having exams. This also shows that inclusive

education is still for some' rather than 'all,' and that policy research to address the above as

exclusionary practices is needed. Moving from a hierarchical form of authority to a horizontal

business model to increase equality for handicapped pupils and combat prejudice. The method

should be revised, and teaching teams should be given the ability to adopt teaching as an
 33

inclusive practice in their classroom at their choice, with 310 proper accountabilities, in my

opinion.

Members of the team will get a professional identity as a result of this. This indicates that the

student and the educational experience are at the center, necessitating a shift in how learning and

teaching take place. It also necessitates active participation on the part of instructors. Equality of

opportunity does not simply mean that opportunities are available to all pupils; it also means that

everyone has access to those chances. One of the qualities of inclusive teachers and LSAs is their

ability to collaborate in the implementation of universal design for learning, which accepts

diversity as the norm and is responsive to the diverse contexts of students' lives while ensuring

that all students achieve the best possible results.

 34

References

Alves, I. (2020). Enacting education policy reform in Portugal–the process of change and the role of

teacher education for inclusion. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 64-82.

Asmus, E. P., & Radocy, R. E. (2017). Quantitative analysis. In Critical Essays in Music Education (pp.

129-172). Routledge.

Bergmark, U., & Kostenius, C. (2018). Appreciative student voice model–reflecting on an appreciative

inquiry research method for facilitating student voice processes. Reflective practice, 19(5), 623-

637.

Boyle, C., & Anderson, J. (2020). The justification for inclusive education in Australia. Prospects, 49(3),

203-217.

Cornwall, J. (2018). Opportunity and Change–Inclusive or Exclusive Education?. In Choice,

Opportunity and Learning (pp. 232-258). Routledge.

DeMatthews, D. E., Serafini, A., & Watson, T. N. (2021). Leading inclusive schools: Principal

perceptions, practices, and challenges to meaningful change. Educational Administration

Quarterly, 57(1), 3-48.

Dobia, B., Parada, R. H., Roffey, S., & Smith, M. (2019). Social and emotional learning: From

individual skills to class cohesion. Educational & Child Psychology, 36(2), 78-90.

Fuller*, M., Bradley, A., & Healey, M. (2004). Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive

higher education environment. Disability & society, 19(5), 455-468.

Gao, Y., Yang, M., & Li, L. (2018). Excel and SPSS analysis of independent sample t-test. Animal

Husbandry and Feed Science (Inner Mongolia), 39(10), 79-82.

Gidden, E., & Jones, D. (2021). Examining the impact of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) on

minimizing academic accommodations in post-secondary: A Literature Review.

 35

Gilson, C. B., Gushanas, C. M., Li, Y. F., & Foster, K. (2020). Defining inclusion: Faculty and student

attitudes regarding postsecondary education for students with intellectual and developmental

disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 65-81.

Holden, L. R., Haughbrook, R., & Hart, S. (2021). Developmental behavioral genetics research on

school achievement is missing vulnerable children, to our detriment.

Horner, R., & Monzalve-Macaya, M. (2018). A framework for building safe and effective school

environments: Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS).

Kantavong, P. (2018). Understanding inclusive education practices in schools under local government

jurisdiction: a study of Khon Kaen Municipality in Thailand. International Journal of Inclusive

Education, 22(7), 767-786.

Kozibroda, L. V., Kruhlyk, O. P., Zhuravlova, L. S., & Chupakhina, S. V. (2020). Practice and

Innovations of Inclusive Education at School. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7),

176-186.

Krämer, S., Möller, J., & Zimmermann, F. (2021). Inclusive education of students with general learning

difficulties: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 432-478.

LAWSON, A. (2020). Disability Law as an Academic Discipline: Towards Cohesion and

Mainstreaming?. Journal of Law and Society, 47(4), 558-587.

Mackes, N. K., Golm, D., Sarkar, S., Kumsta, R., Rutter, M., Fairchild, G., ... & Sonuga-Barke, E. J.

(2020). Early childhood deprivation is associated with alterations in adult brain structure despite

subsequent environmental enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences, 117(1), 641-649.

McKinney, E. L., & Swartz, L. (2020). Integration into higher education: experiences of disabled

students in South Africa. Studies in Higher Education, 1-11.

 36

Meijer, C. J., & Watkins, A. (2019). Financing special needs and inclusive education–from Salamanca

to the present. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7-8), 705-721.

Mezzanotte, C. (2022). The social and economic rationale of inclusive education: An overview of the

outcomes in education for diverse groups of students.

Mpofu, J. (2022). Modeling Inclusive Education in Urban Schools. In Handbook of Research on

Creating Spaces for African Epistemologies in the Inclusive Education Discourse (pp. 274-289).

IGI Global.

Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.

Otukile-Mongwaketse, M. (2018). Teacher centred approaches: their implications for today's inclusive

classrooms.

Palla, L., & Vallberg Roth, A. C. (2020). Inclusive ideals and special educational tools in and out of tact:

didactical voices on teaching in language and communication in Swedish early childhood

education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1-16.

Paul, J. M. (2022). Creating Opportunities for Learning for English Learners with Disabilities through

Quality Individualized Education Programs (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University).

Qu, X. (2020). A critical realist model of inclusive education for children with special educational needs

and/or disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-15.

Ramberg, J., & Watkins, A. (2020, January). Exploring inclusive education across Europe: some

insights from the European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education. In FIRE: Forum for

International Research in Education (Vol. 6, No. 1).

Ressa, T. (2021). Chrono-curriculum and the miseducation of American disabled students. International

Journal of Educational Research, 110, 101883.

 37

Sansour, T., & Bernhard, D. (2018). Special needs education and inclusion in Germany and Sweden.

Alter, 12(3), 127-139.

Schapals, A. K. (2018). Fake news: Australian and British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of

“alternative facts”. Journalism Practice, 12(8), 976-985.

Stites, M. L., Rakes, C. R., Noggle, A. K., & Shah, S. (2018). Preservice teacher perceptions of

preparedness to teach in inclusive settings as an indicator of teacher preparation program

effectiveness. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(2), 21-39.

Trunova, I., Miroshnyk, O., Savchenko, O., & Moroz, O. (2019). The perfection of motivational model

for improvement of power supply quality with using the one-way analysis of variance. Scientific

Bulletin of National Mining University, (6).

Wandera, M. (2019). Exclusive education towards inclusion in higher education after 2015. Msingi

Journal, 1(2), 20-37.

Welter, E. R. (2021). The Effects of Inclusive Classrooms on Students With Disabilities and Effective

Inclusive Classroom Strategies.

Yang, S. M. (2021). Educators’ Perceptions on Students with Disabilities, Inclusion and Instructional

Technology after COVID-19 (Doctoral dissertation, Trident University International).