Executive Summary
This report investigates the role of Spacing Media, a Toronto-based independent urban
journalism agency, in shaping public perceptions and policy decisions related to urban social
change. Through a mixed-method approach, this study explores how independent media like
Spacing fosters civic engagement, holds institutions accountable, and mobilizes grassroots
advocacy. Drawing on case studies, literature, and ethnographic observations, I demonstrate that
Spacing’s reporting catalyzes public dialogue and community-oriented social change, along with
organizations like The Tyee, Solutions Journalism Network, and CityLab at UCLA, which all
serve to demonstrate independent journalism’s correlation with positive policy outcomes and
civic trust. I also draw on ethnographic insights from my placement experience, which further
reinforce that ethical storytelling and collaborative community relationships are central to
Spacing’s bottom-up, authentic storytelling approach. Based on these findings, recommendations
for sustaining independent urban media include strengthening cross-sector collaborations and
advocating for public and philanthropic funding models to ensure the sustainable operation of
these organizations to continually shape inclusive cities.
Introduction & Background
Independent urban journalism organizations play a crucial role of amplifying underrepresented
voices, influencing public discourse, and holding decision-makers accountable. Thus, the ability
of independent outlets like Spacing to sustain their operations is critical to ensuring vibrant,
informed, and inclusive urban discourse. My placement organization, Spacing Media (Spacing),
is a leading force in highlighting urban issues such as gentrification, affordability, public space
accessibility, and transportation equity in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). However, as Spacing
has increasingly faced operational pressures due to the shrinkage of traditional magazine
distribution channels, it is crucial to raise awareness of the value it provides as both an online
media agency and a physical, community-based magazine storefront that also serves as an event
space. This report investigates Spacing's role within the urban ecosystem, grounded in the
hypothesis that traditional and independent media coverage can meaningfully shape positive
social change. Through literature review, comparative case studies, and ethnographic fieldwork,
this study examines Spacing’s engagement with community advocacy and policy outcomes as
part of the broader movement of better city-building.
Problem Statement
Due to urban commercial pressures shaped by zoning reforms, gentrification, and rising rents,
there has been a gradual decline of Toronto’s main streets and traditional distribution channels
for magazines, which organizations like Spacing rely on. The City of Toronto has recognized this
as a significant challenge in a 2020 report, especially for cities like Islington, Yonge and Finch,
among 11 other cities in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The city has since adopted a policy
recognizing the vital role of independent Main Street businesses in Toronto and declared it would
conduct a comprehensive follow-up study on the state of Toronto’s Main Street businesses in five
years (Tuohey, 2024). However, whether the revitalization efforts Toronto has piloted since, such
as the “Small Business Advocate” program have been effective remains in question; the
sentiments of Spacing illustrate the importance of continuous evaluation on how to create social
and economic infrastructure that enables the success of local businesses on main street (City of
Toronto, 2020). It is thus crucial to raise awareness on the value these organizations provide to
ensure successful advocacy for potential public and private funding, as the decline of
independent print media could impact the diversity of voices in urban discourse. This study
addresses that gap and investigates the correlation between media coverage of urban issues,
public engagement with these stories, and their subsequent influence on urban policies and social
movements through the following research questions.
Key Research Questions
1. How do independent urban media outlets like Spacing shape public perception and
policy-making regarding urban social change in the Greater Toronto Area?
2. According to existing case studies, how does audience engagement with media outlets
online and on print platforms affect the dissemination and impact of urban stories?
Study Design
I employ a mixed-method approach, combining a literature review, a comparative case study and
an ethnography of my placement experience. First, the literature review includes an analysis of
academic sources on media influence in urban planning and social change, drawing from
industry white papers, news articles and academic scholarship to provide a theoretical foundation
for understanding how independent media shapes urban governance. Further, the comparative
case studies will compare and contrast Spacing Media and a series of other urban journalism
agencies in other geographies, such as The Tyee, to understand how various independent
journalism agencies have been able to influence public opinion and policy. To ensure the
comparative case studies provide insights most relevant to Spacing, the selected journalism
agencies operate similarly to Spacing (particularly in terms of categories of urban themes
featured). Lastly, the ethnography offers a vital layer of insight, grounded in first-hand,
immersive experience during the time I spent working at Spacing Media. It will be structured
around four core areas of my observations during my placement.
Findings and Discussion
I. Literature Review
In line with my hypothesis, organizations such as the Solutions Journalism Network
(SJN) have demonstrated that urban reporting initiatives can inspire "better cities" by showcasing
actionable solutions and amplifying marginalized voices (Solutions Journalism Network, 2024).
Douglas (2024) argues that this organization’s work is representative of solutions journalism,
which not only reports on urban challenges but solutions to problems by interviewing
community leaders who are most knowledgeable on the particular issues being reported, which
in turn encourages reflection and engagement among readers and cultivates collective trust in
journalism. Beers (2020) echoes this approach to journalism and cites the power urban
journalists have to address urban issues like affordable housing. In particular, Beers (2020)
describes in-depth reporting at The Tyee on stories of modular housing units played the role of a
"honeybee" and pollinated critical engagement with social issues and the potential pathway of
creating collective solutions. I also identify theoretical frameworks, such as mediated
deliberation, solution-oriented reporting, and culturally resonant storytelling, which explain the
correlative linkages between community engagement and urban policy outcomes.
A. Mediated Deliberation & Solutions Journalism
To begin, independent urban journalism enhances mediated deliberation by bridging
citizens and policymakers, fostering transparency in urban governance. Mediated deliberation
refers to a process in which media mediates public and decision-makers to facilitate informed
discourse on social issues through disseminating reliable information, framing diverse
perspectives, and encouraging public engagement (Hoversten & Swaffield, 2019). Habermas
argues that mediated deliberation discursively mobilizes public discussion and action on social
issues in democratic processes (Olson, n.d.). Democratic processes span from the influence of
policy outcomes through shaping voter behaviour, which is demonstrated in an example
highlighted by Damurski et al. (2023), where investigative reporting successfully reduced
misused municipal funds by 1% per additional media outlet in Mexico. Moreover, in the rise of
the digital era, the next generation is becoming increasingly digitally literate. Chile’s MiVoz
project’s usage of SMS and social media to mobilize communities around environmental issues
demonstrates the relationship between digital agility and grassroots engagement, ultimately
enabling real-time dialogues between citizens and officials beyond the constraints of geography
(Damurski et al., 2023). Lenfest Institute (2024) found that Independent outlets like Bridge
Michigan and Montana Free Press significantly boost civic participation, with users 15–20%
more likely to vote, volunteer, or contact elected officials than non-users, demonstrating direct
causal relationships between political movements and media journalism consumption. This also
reflects the broader movement of solutions journalism, which rigorously examines responses to
social problems and has been institutionalized through global networks like the Solutions
Journalism Network (SJN), enabling collaborative reporting on issues such as poverty and
housing (Solutions Journalism Network, 2024).
B. Culturally Resonant Storytelling & Community Advocacy
Further, multiple geographies have demonstrated “hyperlocal journalism” on building
community trust through culturally resonant storytelling, especially among marginalized
communities. Solutions journalism in developing societies, such as India and Nigeria, has
improved rural healthcare access by highlighting evidence-based interventions (Global Media
Journal, 2024). This illustrates how journalism agencies that are independently operated social
enterprises have the power to report on authentic community experience that can, in turn, serve
as evidence for urban discourse that contribute to policy recommendations addressing substantial
gaps. This collaborative journalistic process is an important representation of how cross-sector
partnerships can amplify urban social change, but only through voluntary participation of
communities of interest. Wenzel (2016) found that in South Los Angeles, solutions-oriented
reporting increased residents’ willingness to engage with news, though skepticism persisted due
to historical stigmatization, which highlights the flipside of collaborative journalism—mistrust in
the media. This all the more, showcases the importance of nurturing positive relationships
between communities and journalism organizations.
II. Comparative Case Studies
A Deep Dive into Spacing’s Impact
In this section, I examine the dominant themes highlighted in Spacing's published
content, its reach, and its engagement in effective cross-sector collaborations. Most of the
quantitative information, such as articles published and shares of posts, for instance, refer to its
digital content as it is publicly accessible information on the internet. This information is also
more easily measured compared to physical magazine copies due to the limitations of following
through with the impact and discourse discussed around it.
Spacing frequently addresses issues like transportation infrastructure, housing
affordability, and accessibility of public spaces. For instance, up to 20 articles are published on
their online article database, including a story I published during my placement, titled “Sanctuary
Toronto, a place of refuge” (as shown in figure 1), which highlights the displacement of
marginalized communities due to rising rents and redevelopment projects. This topic is
spotlighted not only because it is one of the most discussed topics in city hall debates and an
issue very much visible to downtown Toronto residents but also because of a long-standing
positive relationship between Spacing and community outreach experts this space. According to
conversations I’ve had with interview participants for his piece, it has been reshared among
community workers who play an active role in housing advocacy, part of even larger
organizations like Fred Victor and the Canadian Centre for Housing Rights. Another example of
collaborative journalism is the contribution of Maryam Sabzevari, Senior Planner Urban
Designer at City of Toronto, in an article published by my supervisor, Dylan Reid, on Yonge
Street’s central role in shaping Toronto through the article, Forever Yonge (as shown in figure 1).
Sabzevari shared a post about it on LinkedIn, which has already received up to 1000 views in
just under 2 months and has been reposted by Spacing, demonstrating even more reach online.
As such, Spacing’s digital content generates significant engagement through article
shares, comments, and social media discussions, particularly on LinkedIn and Facebook. This
indicates that content published by Spacing has been able to generate further discourse on
platforms designed for professionals in the “social impact field”, such as those working in social
enterprises or thinktanks, as well as among individuals who are simply raising awareness in their
communities through personal sharing. Spacing’s reporting not only informs readers but also
mobilizes them to participate in civic initiatives. By framing urban challenges as solvable
through community action or policy change, Spacing has inspired community-led advocacy
efforts that seek to engage directly with the policy-making process.
Figure 1. Sanctuary Toronto, A Place of Refuge
Figure 2. LinkedIn Post Promoting Forever Yonge
Comparative Insights
I then compare and contrast Spacing and other urban media organizations to investigate
potentially correlative relationships between media coverage of urban issues and outcomes such
as public perception shifts, policy changes, and social movements. I highlight in figure 3, three
organizations that similarly publish independent urban media pieces to Spacing, combining
research, grounded interviews and community collaboration to create bottom-up discourse
designed to shape social change. Selected organizations include The Tyee (located in
Vancouver), Solution Journalism Network (SJN) (located in New York City), and CityLab at
UCLA (located in Los Angeles).
Figure 3 features key issues addressed, funding model, audience engagement and policy
influence of these organizations for a brief overview. I identify their primary focus as an
organization, key urban topics addressed, funding model, audience engagement and policy
influence. Despite being in various major cities around the world, these organizations all rely on
some sort of grant or partnership support, whether it’s public or private funding—this means it is
crucial that they demonstrate the value they provide in creating positive social change, as my
problem statement concerns. Most of them cover a wide range of urban issues from housing and
transit equity to education reforms. The four organizations have at least 5 overlapping themes,
namely issues related to housing, accessibility, racial and gender equity as well as public space
design. Another key similarity is that their missions and operations all rely on effective
collaboration with their network, spanning from their local and national readership, newsletter
members and community organizations that may even co-write and co-publish articles with
them. These forms of tight-knit engagement allow them to shape policy outcomes through
grassroot advocacy and impact a variety of urban policies and reforms, especially in the issue
areas these organizations primarily report on.
In figure 4, I demonstrate how these organizations showcase the correlative
relationships between urban journalism reporting and social change through 4 mechanisms:
Agenda Setting, Framing, Mobilization and Accountability. While each organization operates in
distinct contexts, their shared strategies demonstrate how mediated deliberation can transform
public discourse into actionable change. I elaborate on specific examples using articles published
by each organization, which are also explored in-depth in figure 5.
Agenda-setting is used to prioritize and ensure that important urban challenges remain
central to public and policymaker discussions. For instance, CityLab at UCLA uses
research-driven agenda-setting to spotlight underutilized resources, such as its work on
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) that informed California’s AB 2299 (2016). This legislation
eased restrictions on backyard homes and resulted in over 83,865 ADU permits by 2022. SJN
amplifies solutions to systemic issues through its reporting. Further, The Tyee uses
agenda-setting to focus on housing affordability and homelessness. Articles like “Modular
One-Person Homes Fill a Need in Vancouver” (2017) shifted public discourse toward modular
housing as a scalable solution, pressuring policymakers to approve projects like Larwill Place.
Agenda-setting thus ensures that critical issues like housing equity gain public attention.
Framing is utilized to present systemic challenges as solvable through actionable
solutions. Spacing Magazine frames gentrification not as an inevitable outcome but as a
challenge that can be addressed through community action. Articles like “Mapping Our
Urbanism Part VI – Income” (2008) linked income disparities to housing unaffordability caused
by gentrification in inner-city neighborhoods, fostering support for inclusive zoning policies. The
Tyee emphasizes solutions over problems in its reporting; through “Social Housing Is Leaving
Low-Income People Out in the Cold” (2024), they critiqued BC Housing’s exclusionary
practices while reframing the debate around shelter-rate affordability as a policy priority.
Meanwhile, SJN highlights replicable models of success through its solutions-oriented reporting.
Coverage of Louisiana’s gun violence reduction programs emphasized community-based
interventions that inspired similar policies in other cities. By framing challenges like
gentrification or gun violence as solvable through evidence-based interventions, these
organizations foster hope and inspire collective action.
Mobilization helps these organizations turn public support into tangible outcomes by
engaging communities directly. In addition to publishing research-based articles, CityLab at
UCLA engages stakeholders through design competitions like the “Small Lots, Big Impacts”
initiative (2025), which invited architects to propose affordable housing prototypes for 1,040
city-owned parcels in Los Angeles. This initiative is a prime example of community engagement
from authentic reporting to bottom-up mobilization, gaining critical buy-in for pilot
developments aimed at addressing the city’s housing crisis. SJN also fosters mobilization
through cross-newsroom collaborations such as the Broke in Philly initiative, which united 19
outlets to report on poverty solutions and amplify grassroots efforts around housing trusts.
Accountability ensure that policies are equitable and responsive to community needs
by exposing institutional failures or tracking policy impacts. Spacing Magazine holds institutions
accountable through sustained coverage of issues like Toronto’s waterfront redevelopment
projects, which exposed corporate influence over public space privatization and led to stricter
oversight measures. The Tyee uses investigative reporting to expose systemic failures within BC
Housing. Specifically, its ethics investigations triggered policy reviews and reforms within
British Columbia’s housing sector. CityLab at UCLA evaluates policy impacts through
post-occupancy studies of projects like Golden Age Park in Los Angeles, informing design
improvements based on community feedback about intergenerational use of public spaces.
Accountability across these organizations, thus, ensure transparency is upheld among the
institutions they critique while driving systemic reforms.
Figure 3. Overview: Independent Journalism Agencies Features
Solution
Feature Spacing Media The Tyee Journalism CityLab at UCLA
Network
Location Toronto Vancouver New York City Los Angelas
Housing Poverty,
Key Issues Housing, transit, Housing insecurity,
affordability, education
Addressed public spaces systemic racism
environment reforms
Non-profit
Print & digital Grants & Academic grants &
Funding Model supported by
revenue partnerships collaborations
readers
Collaborative
Audience Local & national Reader-supported Community-based
newsroom
Engagement readership membership design projects
networks
Grassroots Education
advocacy with Direct impact on reforms & Equity-focused
Policy Influence
other community housing policies poverty urban policies
organizations alleviation
Figure 4. Key Mechanisms Linking Media and Outcomes
Solution
Mechanism Spacing Media The Tyee Journalism CityLab at UCLA
Network
Heritage Modular housing School discipline ADU legislation
Agenda-Setting
preservation approvals reforms (AB 2299)
debates
Gentrification as Shelter-rate Replicable gun Teacher housing on
Framing
cultural erasure housing advocacy violence programs school land
Community
Public art Cross-newsroom Small Lots design
Mobilization support for social
campaigns poverty reporting competitions
housing
Corporate Housing trust
BC Housing Post-occupancy
Accountability development scalability
ethics reviews evaluations
oversight tracking
Figure 5. Specific Examples—Mechanisms & Policy Outcomes
Mechanism Organization Example Policy Outcome
Spacing Media Coverage on Sparked grassroots
affordable housing advocacy and
Agenda-Setting and gentrification influenced urban
elevated public policy discussions
discourse in Toronto.
CityLab at UCLA Research into Co-authored AB
accessory dwelling 2299 (2016),
units (ADUs) reducing restrictions
highlighted their on ADUs statewide,
potential for resulting in over
addressing housing 83,865 permits issued
shortages. between 2016 and
2022
Solutions Reporting on Inspired other cities
Journalism Network Louisiana’s gun to adopt similar
Framing (SJN) violence programs programs, leading to
emphasized measurable
actionable solutions reductions in gun
rather than just violence
problems
The Tyee The coverage of Influenced public
modular housing discourse and policy
solutions framed adoption in
innovative Vancouver for
approaches to modular housing
housing affordability projects
as replicable models.
The Tyee Investigative Initiated pilot projects
reporting on modular for replicable
Mobilization housing solutions affordable housing
mobilized community models in Hamilton
support for projects
CityLab at UCLA The "Small Lots, Big Initiated pilot projects
Impacts" initiative for replicable
engaged architects affordable housing
and designers to models in
propose innovative LosAngeless
housing solutions for
vacant city-owned
lots.
The Tyee Exposed ethical Led to policy reviews
Accountability issues within BC and systemic reforms
Housing through within the housing
investigative sector
reporting.
Limitations
While these case studies provide evidence of correlative relationship between urban
journalism and policy shifts, I cannot conclude these linkages to be causal. The nature of this
research is a literature review and case study comparison, which 1) cannot conclusively identify
whether the media is the only factor influencing policy changes. Urban policy changes often
result from multiple factors, including activist pressure and economic shifts, making it difficult
to isolate the media’s direct influence. 2) the limited time I had throughout this research project
to analyze more media organizations and their relationships with urban discourse-driven change.
This underscores the necessity of further experimental research to establish stronger causal
claims.
III. Ethnography: Placement Experiences
I now discuss my personal experience working as a journalism intern at Spacing and my
observations on foregrounding underrepresented narratives, facilitating community storytelling,
and how its physical storefront and online platform have curated intentional spaces for
community building among grassroots organizations. I have witnessed how Spacing contributes
meaningfully to how urban issues are understood, discussed, and addressed at both the public
and policy levels. I find that bottom-up storytelling, cross-sector collaboration, and the
mobilization of community voices are showcased through the five key processes a news article
that is aimed to create social change undergoes: 1) Instruction and editorial philosophy provided
by my supervisor, 2) Training in ethical interviewing and representation. 3) Iterative feedback
and revision mechanisms, and 4) Publication and community reception of the final pieces. These
pathways are what effectively enable independent urban journalism to become mechanisms of
positive social change.
1) Instruction and editorial philosophy provided by my supervisor
It became evident that Spacing’s editorial philosophy centers on amplifying underrepresented
narratives and fostering grassroots engagement, especially at the beginning of my internship
when I was first learning about journalistic practices and was given the freedom to create articles
from the conception of the idea, outreach to interviewees, interviews and writing. My supervisor,
Dylan Reid, emphasized the importance of ethical storytelling that prioritizes community voices
over institutional commentary. For example, in “Sanctuary Toronto: A Place of Refuge,” I
explored how Toronto’s 2025 winter plan for homeless shelters was inadequate in supporting the
expected homeless population. I, however, did not tell this story through my own words, but the
words of community members and outreach workers at Sanctuary. I will discuss the ethics of
interviewing further in section 3. The emphasis of not writing as an opinion piece but rather
authentic reporting of community voices, however, is Spacing’s central approach, which
positions Spacing as a bridge between marginalized communities and broader urban
conversations, ensuring that stories resonate emotionally with readers while highlighting
systemic challenges like the housing crisis.
2) Training in ethical interviewing and representation
Accurate community representation through ethical practices was emphasized when I received
training for a conversation with a homeless woman at Sanctuary Toronto, where I was
encouraged to prioritize open-ended questions, use hand-written notes to capture the interview
instead of voice recordings, and maintain anonymity of her identity when writing the piece after.
My conversation went extremely well and was also a significant moment where I experienced
mobilization of community voices as a mechanism for social change personally, hyperfixating on
amplifying her voice to be heard by the reach my article would generate. In addition, through my
interviews with individuals involved in heritage preservation programs and public art projects, I
observed how eager individuals are to share their lived experiences when provided a respectful
and thoughtful platform. While these stories not only highlight personal and community
resilience but also frame broader systemic issues in a way that is deeply relatable to readers, it
was only possible to obtain these authentic sharings through maintaining respect for interviewees
and contributors with ethical storytelling. Thus, Spacing prioritizes curating content that
resonates emotionally with audiences, encouraging readers to see themselves not just as passive
consumers of news but as potential participants in urban change.
3) Iterative feedback and revision
Through a process of editing and refining my writing with my supervisor, Dylan provided
specific guidance on structuring narratives to ensure articles resonated with both local readers
and policymakers. For instance, in “A Call to Preserve Kensington Market” (Figure 5), Dylan
advised me to emphasize Kensington Market’s cultural significance while linking gentrification
threats to tangible policy solutions, such as heritage preservation efforts. To engage policymakers
effectively, I incorporated details about existing heritage designations and proposed zoning
reforms that could protect the neighborhood’s character. Dylan also emphasized to incorporate
clear language and actionable takeaways, ensuring the article could be used as a reference point
in community meetings or advocacy campaigns. We worked closely as he provided iterative
feedback for me throughout the ideating, writing and publishing stages, which reinforced the
notion that independent media outlets serve as platforms for democratic engagement for shaping
urban social change.
4) Publication and community reception of the final pieces
One of the most striking moments for myself was a case in which a feature article spotlighting
emerging historians contributed to an increased interest in funding opportunities for a community
heritage project from the attention my physical magazine issue, featuring Heritage Toronto, had
published. The article’s circulation drew attention from local grant-making bodies, culminating
in the awarding of financial support through audience engagement. Spacing’s targeted
readership, consisting largely of policy professionals, academics, community organizers, and
civically engaged citizens, helps ensure that the stories it tells circulate within influential
networks. Readers often share articles on social media, reference them in community meetings,
and use them to inform grassroots activism or even formal advocacy efforts. This highlights the
potential of independent journalism not only to inform but also to mobilize material resources for
social change.
Figure 5. A Call to Preserve Kensington Market
Conclusion
Overall, my placement experience at Spacing demonstrates that independent urban media outlets
play a pivotal role in shaping urban social change by amplifying community voices, reframing
public narratives, and fostering grassroots policy dialogue. Furthermore, audience engagement
across print and online platforms enables these narratives to circulate widely and deeply,
ensuring that critical urban stories have both immediate visibility and lasting influence.
Organizations like Spacing Media, The Tyee, CityLab at UCLA, and SJN demonstrate how
agenda-setting, framing, mobilization, and accountability mechanisms can drive systemic
change. To sustain their impact and address the challenges they face, the following
recommendations are proposed:
1. Strengthen Cross-Sector Collaborations: Independent media outlets should deepen
partnerships with community organizations, advocacy groups, academic institutions, and
policymakers to co-create content that resonates with diverse audiences.
2. Diversify Funding Sources: To address financial pressures caused by declining print
revenues, media organizations should explore alternative funding models such as grants
from philanthropic organizations, reader-supported memberships (e.g., The Tyee’s
“Builders” program), and crowdfunding campaigns. Additionally, partnerships with local
governments or private sector sponsors could provide sustainable revenue streams while
maintaining editorial independence.
3. Leverage Digital Tools for Audience Engagement: Digital platforms offer
opportunities to expand audience reach and foster interactive dialogue between
journalists and readers. Spacing could enhance its online presence by expanding on
multimedia storytelling formats (e.g., podcasts or video documentaries) and using
analytics tools to track audience engagement metrics for targeted content creation.
4. Focus on Solutions-Oriented Reporting: Inspired by SJN’s success in highlighting
replicable models like Louisiana’s gun violence reduction programs or Santa Fe’s
housing trust fund initiatives, Spacing could adopt a more solutions-oriented approach in
its reporting. By emphasizing actionable responses to urban challenges alongside
problem identification, independent media can inspire hope and drive policy replication.
5. Invest in Training for Ethical Storytelling: As demonstrated during my internship at
Spacing, ethical interviewing practices are essential for building trust with marginalized
communities. Continually providing journalists with training on culturally sensitive
reporting and representation will ensure that stories authentically reflect lived experiences
while fostering credibility among readers.
6. Advocate for Policy Reforms Supporting Independent Media: Media organizations
should engage in collective advocacy efforts to push for policies that support independent
journalism as a public good. This could include tax incentives for local media outlets or
government grants aimed at preserving diverse voices in urban discourse.
Based on my findings, I recommend Spacing, among other independent media organizations to
consider these recommendations to continually foster democratic engagement and drive
meaningful social change.
References
AB2299–2017 accessory dwelling unit law - citylab-UCLA. cityLAB. (n.d.). cityLAB.
[Link]
Beers, D. (2020). The power of solutions journalism. The Tyee.
[Link]
cietal-Problems/
Broke in Philly. (2018, April 17). Home. Broke in Philly. [Link]
Chubb, R. (2013, January 21). Mapping our urbanism part VI - income. Spacing Toronto.
[Link]
City of Toronto. (2020). Current state and future of Toronto’s Retail Main Streets.
[Link]
[Link]
CityLab. (n.d.). UCLA's cityLAB explores innovative strategies for cities. Metropolis Magazine.
[Link]
Damurski, Ł., Ossowicz, T., & Górny, P. (2023). The impact of digital media on urban discourse.
International Journal of E-Planning Research, 12(1), 1–22.
[Link]
Douglas, D. (2024). Not just more bad news: What is solutions journalism? Northwestern
University News.
[Link]
Global Media Journal. (2024). Solution journalism: The need of the contemporary developing
societies. Global Media Journal. [Link]
Hoversten, M. E., & Swaffield, S. R. (2019). Discursive moments: Reframing deliberation and
decision-making in alternative futures landscape ecological planning. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 182, 22–33. [Link]
Hyslop, K. (2017, February 17). “Modular” one-person homes fill a need in Vancouver. The
Tyee. [Link]
Lenfest Institute. (2024). The community impact of independent journalism. Lenfest Institute.
[Link]
Olson, K. (n.d.). Deliberative democracy (Chapter 7). In Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge Core.
[Link]
D4327C35D306E5EA49E66DD90445E5
Reid, D. (2025, February 5). New issue: Forever Yonge. Spacing Toronto.
[Link]
Small Lots design competition. (n.d.). Small Lots design competition.
[Link]
s%20is,thrive%20in%20more%20resilient%20neighborhoods
Social Streets. (2020). The social value of local journalism. Social Streets. [Link]
Solutions Journalism Network. (2021). How solutions journalism is changing communities and
newsrooms. Solutions Journalism Network.
[Link]
Solutions Journalism Network. (2024, January 9). Education Lab case study. Solutions
Journalism Network.
[Link]
uction/case-study
Solutions Journalism Network. (2025, January 14). Solutions journalism case studies from
Europe. Solutions Journalism Network.
[Link]
Spacing Media. (n.d.). Executive summary on Spacing Media’s impact on urban discourse.
Internal report.
Swanson, J. (2024, September 11). “Social housing” is leaving low-income people out in the
cold. The Tyee.
[Link]
The Tyee. (n.d.). The Tyee: Independent daily online news magazine. The Tyee.
[Link]
Tuohey, P. (2024, October 10). Zoning reform’s revival of corner stores. Better Cities Project.
[Link]
ores/
Wenzel, A. (2016). Engaging communities through solutions journalism. Tow Center for Digital
Journalism. [Link]
Yeung, S. (2024, December 18). A place of refuge. Spacing Toronto.
[Link]