Results
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
Age HighSchoolGPA AutonomousMotivation Satisfaction ECTs
Valid 1247 1247 1247 1247 1247
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
Mean
(arithmetic) 19.11 7.100 4.154 2.830 46.20
Std.
Deviation 1.438 0.616 0.482 0.730 11.00
Minimum 17.00 5.500 −3.430 1.000 6.000
Maximum 24.00 8.720 5.000 10.00 120.0
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
Intervention Gender
Valid 1247 1247
Missing 0 0
Mean
(arithmetic)
Std.
Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Frequency Tables
Frequencies for Intervention
Intervention Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
control 624 50.0 50.0 50.0
intervention 623 50.0 50.0 100.0
Missing 0 0.0
Total 1247 100.0
Frequencies for Gender
Gender Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Men 583 46.8 46.8 46.8
Women 664 53.2 53.2 100.0
Missing 0 0.0
Total 1247 100.0
Linear Regression
Model Summary - ECTs
Model R R² Adjusted R² RMSE R² Change df1 df2 p
M₀ 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.00 0.000 0 1246
M₁ 0.228 0.052 0.051 10.72 0.052 2 1244 < .001
Note. M₁ includes AutonomousMotivation, HighSchoolGPA
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
M₁ Regression 7850 2 3925 34.18 < .001
Residual 142900 1244 114.8
Total 150700 1246
Note. M₁ includes AutonomousMotivation, HighSchoolGPA
Note. The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t p
M₀ (Intercept) 46.20 0.311 148.3 < .001
M₁ (Intercept) 19.24 4.238 4.539 < .001
AutonomousMotivation −0.494 0.631 −0.022 −0.782 .434
HighSchoolGPA 4.087 0.494 0.229 8.266 < .001
Part And Partial Correlations
Model Partial Part
M₁ AutonomousMotivation −0.022 −0.022
HighSchoolGPA 0.228 0.228
Note. The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful
information can be shown.
Collinearity Diagnostics
Variance Proportions
Model Dimension Eigenvalue Condition Index (Intercept) AutonomousMotivation HighSchoolGPA
M₁ 1 2.987 1.000 0.001 0.001 0.001
2 0.010 17.19 0.022 0.813 0.246
3 0.003 30.24 0.977 0.186 0.753
Note. The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.
Residuals vs. Predicted
Q-Q Plot Standardized Residuals
Linear Regression
Model Summary - Satisfaction
Model R R² Adjusted R² RMSE R² Change df1 df2 p
M₀ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.730 0.000 0 1246
M₁ 0.209 0.043 0.042 0.714 0.043 2 1244 < .001
Note. M₁ includes Intervention, AutonomousMotivation
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
M₁ Regression 28.84 2 14.42 28.27 < .001
Residual 634.6 1244 0.510
Total 663.5 1246
Note. M₁ includes Intervention, AutonomousMotivation
Note. The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.
Coefficients
95% CI
Model Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t p Lower Upper
M₀ (Intercept) 2.830 0.021 137.0 < .001 2.790 2.871
M₁ (Intercept) 2.009 0.185 10.85 < .001 1.646 2.373
Intervention 0.290 0.040 0.199 7.171 < .001 0.211 0.369
AutonomousMotivation 0.093 0.042 0.061 2.213 .027 0.011 0.175
Descriptives
N Mean SD SE
Satisfaction 1247 2.830 0.730 0.021
Intervention 1247 1.500 0.500 0.014
AutonomousMotivation 1247 4.154 0.482 0.014
Standardized Residuals Histogram
Partial Regression Plot
Satisfaction vs. Intervention ( AutonomousMotivation partialed out )
Satisfaction vs. AutonomousMotivation ( Intervention partialed out )