Q16.

Explain the Comparative Method in Political Science

Introduction
The Comparative Method is one of the most important methods used in
Comparative Politics. It involves the systematic comparison of political
systems, institutions, processes and political behavior in different countries.
Through comparison, political scientists identify similarities, differences and
general principles of political life.
The comparative method has become highly significant in modern political
analysis because it helps in understanding political development,
democracy and governance across nations.
Meaning of Comparative Method
Comparative Method refers to the systematic study and comparison of
political systems to understand political phenomena.
According to Arend Lijphart, comparative method is the method of
discovering empirical relationships among variables.
It compares constitutions, institutions, political culture, party systems and
public policies.
Features of Comparative Method
1. Systematic Comparison
The method scientifically compares political systems and institutions.
2. Study of Similarities and Differences
It identifies common patterns and differences among countries.
3. Empirical Approach
The comparative method is based on observation, facts and data.
4. Broader Scope
It studies both developed and developing political systems.
5. Interdisciplinary Nature
The method uses concepts from sociology, economics and history.
Objectives of Comparative Method
1. Understanding Political Systems
It helps explain functioning of different political systems.
2. Theory Building
Comparison helps formulate general political theories.
3. Identification of Political Patterns
It identifies trends and regularities in politics.

1
4. Evaluation of Institutions
Comparative analysis helps assess effectiveness of institutions.
Importance of Comparative Method
1. Scientific Study of Politics
The comparative method makes political science more scientific.
2. Better Understanding of Democracy
It explains why democracy succeeds in some countries and fails in others.
3. Useful for Policy-Making
Governments learn from experiences of other countries.
4. Understanding Political Development
The method helps analyze modernization and development.
5. Comparative Analysis of Institutions
Political parties, constitutions and electoral systems can be studied
comparatively.
Approaches to Comparative Method
1. Traditional Comparative Method
Focused mainly on constitutions and legal institutions.
2. Modern Comparative Method
Studies political behavior, political culture and development.
Merits of Comparative Method
1. Broadens Political Knowledge
It provides wider understanding of political systems.
2. Helps Generalization
Political scientists derive general principles from comparison.
3. Encourages Objective Analysis
Scientific comparison reduces bias.
Limitations of Comparative Method
1. Complexity of Political Systems
Political systems differ greatly in culture and history.
2. Difficulty in Generalization
Universal conclusions are difficult because societies are different.
3. Problem of Data Collection
Reliable political data may not always be available.
4. Influence of Multiple Factors
Political phenomena are influenced by many social and economic factors.

2
Conclusion
The Comparative Method is an essential method in Political Science and
Comparative Politics. It helps understand political systems scientifically
through systematic comparison. Despite certain limitations, the method
remains highly useful in analyzing democracy, political development and
political institutions across the world.

Q17. Explain the Relationship between Development and Democracy

Introduction
Development and democracy are closely related concepts in modern
political theory and Comparative Politics. Development refers to economic
growth, social progress and improvement in quality of life, whereas
democracy refers to a political system based on popular participation,
liberty and equality.
Many scholars argue that democracy promotes development, while others
believe development creates conditions favorable for democracy.
Meaning of Development
Development refers to the process of economic, social and political
progress in society.
It includes:
Economic growth
Industrialization
Education
Healthcare
Political participation
Improvement in living standards
Meaning of Democracy
Democracy is a system of government in which political power ultimately
rests with the people.
According to Abraham Lincoln, democracy is “government of the people, by
the people and for the people.”
Relationship between Development and Democracy
1. Democracy Promotes Development
Democratic systems encourage accountability, participation and
transparency.

3
How Democracy Helps Development
Free discussion improves policy-making.
Governments become accountable.
Citizens participate in development programs.
Human rights and freedoms are protected.
2. Development Strengthens Democracy
Economic and social development creates conditions favorable for
democratic stability.
How Development Supports Democracy
Education increases political awareness.
Economic prosperity reduces conflict.
Middle class growth supports democratic institutions.
3. Political Participation and Development
Democracy encourages citizen participation in developmental activities.
4. Rule of Law and Good Governance
Democratic governance promotes rule of law and efficient administration.
5. Protection of Human Rights
Democracy safeguards freedom, equality and dignity necessary for human
development.
Views of Scholars
Seymour Martin Lipset
Lipset argued that economic development increases the chances of
democracy.
Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen emphasized that democracy and freedom are essential
components of development.
Importance of Development for Democracy
1. Political Stability
Development reduces poverty and social unrest.
2. Literacy and Awareness
Education strengthens democratic participation.
3. Institutional Development
Economic growth supports administrative and political institutions.
Challenges in the Relationship
1. Authoritarian Development

4
Some authoritarian countries achieved rapid economic growth.
2. Poverty and Weak Democracy
Poor countries often struggle to sustain democratic institutions.
3. Corruption and Inequality
Development may remain unequal despite democratic governance.
Criticism
1. Democracy Does Not Always Ensure Development
Democratic systems sometimes suffer from instability and slow
decision-making.
2. Development without Democracy
Countries like China achieved development under authoritarian systems.
3. Unequal Development
Economic growth may not benefit all sections equally.
Conclusion
Development and democracy are deeply interconnected. Democracy
promotes participation, accountability and human rights, while development
creates conditions necessary for democratic stability. Although there are
exceptions, most modern scholars believe that sustainable development
and democracy strengthen each other.

Q18. What is Political Recruitment?

Introduction
Political Recruitment is an important process in political systems through
which individuals are selected for political roles and leadership positions. It
is closely connected with political participation, political socialization and
political development.
Every political system requires capable individuals to perform political
functions and maintain governance.
Meaning of Political Recruitment
Political recruitment refers to the process through which people are
selected and inducted into political roles and offices.
According to Gabriel Almond and G. Bingham Powell, political recruitment
is the process by which individuals are selected for political roles.
Features of Political Recruitment
1. Selection of Political Leaders

5
Political recruitment identifies individuals for leadership roles.
2. Continuous Process
Recruitment occurs continuously in political systems.
3. Link with Political Participation
Politically active individuals are often recruited into leadership.
4. Influenced by Political Culture
Political values and traditions shape recruitment patterns.
Agencies of Political Recruitment
1. Political Parties
Political parties are the major agencies of recruitment.
2. Educational Institutions
Universities and colleges develop future political leaders.
3. Family and Social Background
Political families often influence recruitment.
4. Interest Groups and Trade Unions
These organizations promote leadership from among members.
5. Media
Media helps create public image and popularity.
Types of Political Recruitment
1. Open Recruitment
All citizens have equal opportunity to enter politics.
Example
Democratic systems.
2. Closed Recruitment
Only selected elites or groups enter political leadership.
Example
Authoritarian systems.
Importance of Political Recruitment
1. Leadership Development
It provides capable leaders for governance.
2. Political Stability
Effective recruitment ensures continuity of political institutions.
3. Democratic Participation
Open recruitment promotes equality and participation.
4. Representation

6
Different social groups gain political representation.
Criticism of Political Recruitment
1. Dominance of Elites
Wealthy and powerful groups often dominate recruitment.
2. Dynastic Politics
Family influence weakens democratic equality.
3. Corruption and Money Power
Political recruitment may be influenced by money and corruption.
Conclusion
Political recruitment is essential for the functioning of political systems. It
provides leadership, ensures representation and promotes political
participation. Despite challenges like elitism and dynastic politics, political
recruitment remains an important process in democratic governance.

Q19. Explain Civic Culture

Introduction
The concept of Civic Culture was developed by Gabriel Almond and Sidney
Verba in their famous work The Civic Culture. They argued that democracy
becomes stable and successful when citizens possess a balanced political
culture combining participation with trust and moderation.
Civic culture is considered the ideal political culture for democratic systems.
Meaning of Civic Culture
Civic Culture refers to a balanced political culture in which citizens actively
participate in politics while maintaining trust in political institutions.
According to Almond and Verba, civic culture combines elements of
parochial, subject and participant political cultures.
Features of Civic Culture
1. Political Participation
Citizens actively participate in political activities.
2. Political Trust
People have confidence in political institutions.
3. Tolerance and Cooperation
Citizens respect different political opinions.
4. Balance between Authority and Liberty
Citizens support government authority while protecting freedom.

7
5. Democratic Orientation
People believe in democratic values and constitutional methods.
Importance of Civic Culture
1. Stability of Democracy
Civic culture strengthens democratic institutions.
2. Encourages Participation
It motivates citizens to vote and engage in public affairs.
3. Political Moderation
Civic culture reduces extremism and conflict.
4. Accountability
Citizens monitor government actions.
Criticism of Civic Culture
1. Western Bias
Critics argue that Almond and Verba favored Western democracies.
2. Difficulty in Measurement
Political attitudes are difficult to measure accurately.
3. Neglect of Economic Factors
Economic inequality also affects democracy.
Conclusion
Civic culture is an important concept in Comparative Politics. It explains
how democratic stability depends upon citizens’ attitudes and participation.
Despite criticism, the concept remains valuable in understanding
democratic political culture.

Q20. Discuss the Institutional Approach in Comparative Politics and its

Limitations

Introduction

The Institutional Approach is one of the oldest and traditional approaches in

Comparative Politics. It mainly studies political institutions such as the
state, legislature, executive, judiciary and constitution. Before the rise of
behavioralism, Comparative Politics was largely dominated by the
institutional approach.

8
This approach focuses on formal political structures and their legal powers
and functions.

Meaning of Institutional Approach

Institutional Approach refers to the study of political institutions and

constitutional structures in a comparative manner.

According to this approach, political systems can be understood through

the analysis of governmental institutions and legal arrangements.

Features of Institutional Approach

1. Study of Formal Institutions

The approach mainly studies legislature, executive, judiciary and

constitution.

2. Legal and Constitutional Orientation

It emphasizes constitutional rules and legal procedures.

3. Descriptive Nature

Traditional institutionalism mainly describes political institutions.

4. Historical Analysis

Political institutions are studied in historical context.

5. Comparative Study

Different constitutions and political institutions are compared.

Importance of Institutional Approach

9
1. Foundation of Comparative Politics

Institutional approach laid the foundation for modern comparative analysis.

2. Understanding Political Structures

It helps understand organization and functioning of government.

3. Study of Constitutional Systems

The approach is useful for constitutional and legal analysis.

4. Administrative Understanding

It explains powers and functions of political institutions.

Merits of Institutional Approach

1. Systematic Study

Political institutions are studied systematically.

2. Legal Clarity

The approach clearly explains constitutional structures.

3. Comparative Analysis

Different governmental systems can be compared effectively.

4. Historical Significance

It provides historical understanding of political institutions.

10
Limitations of Institutional Approach

1. Neglect of Political Behavior

The approach ignores political behavior and public opinion.

2. Excessive Formalism

It focuses more on legal structures than actual political practices.

3. Static Nature

Institutional approach fails to explain political change and development.

4. Limited Scope

Social, economic and cultural factors are neglected.

5. Western Bias

Traditional institutional analysis mainly focused on Western democracies.

Conclusion

The Institutional Approach is an important traditional approach in

Comparative Politics. It contributed significantly to the study of constitutions
and governmental institutions. However, its excessive emphasis on formal
institutions and neglect of political behavior led to the emergence of
modern approaches like behavioralism and new institutionalism.

11