1
CHAPTER 1
THE MEANING OF HISTORY, SOURCES OF HISTORICAL DATA, AND HISTORICAL
CRITICISMS
LESSON 1: THE MEANING OF HISTORY
I. THE MEANING OF HISTORY
Definition of History
The term "history" derives from the Greek word "historia," which means learning
through inquiry.
Additional Description
The word inquiry means asking questions, investigating, examining evidence, and
searching for facts in order to gain knowledge. Thus, history is not merely the
memorization of dates and events. Rather, it is a disciplined process of investigating the
past to understand what happened and why it happened.
History seeks to reconstruct past human experiences through the careful examination of
evidence. It is both a body of knowledge and a method of investigation.
Aristotle's View of History
Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, viewed history as the systematic account of natural
phenomena, considering the chronological arrangement of events.
Example:
Year Event
1861 Jose Rizal was born
1887 Noli Me Tangere was
published
1896 Jose Rizal was executed
By arranging events chronologically, historians can identify patterns, causes, and
consequences of historical developments.
Aristotle emphasized that knowledge is obtained through investigation and observation
rather than assumptions.
History as a Narrative Account
Generally, history refers to the narrative account of phenomena, particularly human
affairs, arranged in chronological order.
Additional Description
Human affairs refer to activities involving people and societies, including:
Politics
2
Government
Religion
Culture
Economics
Education
Wars
Revolutions
Social movements
History records these activities to help people understand the development of societies
and civilizations over time.
II. TYPES OF HISTORY
Historians develop theories to investigate and understand history.
History is commonly divided into two forms:
1. Factual History
2. Speculative History
A. FACTUAL HISTORY
Definition
Factual history focuses on presenting basic and straightforward information to the
reader.
It answers:
Who?
What?
When?
Where?
It establishes the fundamental details of an event without necessarily explaining its
causes or significance.
Example
Questio Answer
n
Who? Jose Rizal
What? Published Noli Me Tangere
When? 1887
Where? Berlin, Germany
These facts serve as the foundation of historical knowledge.
Importance of Factual History
Factual history is important because:
It provides accurate information.
It establishes historical truth based on evidence.
It serves as the basis for interpretation.
3
It prevents historical distortions.
Without factual history, meaningful historical analysis cannot occur.
B. SPECULATIVE HISTORY
Definition
Speculative history goes beyond mere facts and explores:
How?
Why?
events occurred.
It seeks to explain historical developments rather than simply describe them.
Example
Factual History
"Jose Rizal published Noli Me Tangere in 1887."
Speculative History
"Jose Rizal published Noli Me Tangere to expose social injustices and encourage
reforms during Spanish colonial rule."
The first statement tells what happened.
The second explains why it happened.
Importance of Speculative History
Speculative history allows historians to:
Understand motivations.
Analyze consequences.
Identify patterns.
Explain social change.
Develop deeper interpretations.
It transforms history from a simple record of facts into a meaningful explanation of
human experiences.
III. HISTORIANS AND THEIR ROLE
Who Are Historians?
Historians are individuals who study, analyze, interpret, and write about the past.
Their goal is to gain insights into the present by studying what occurred in the past.
Responsibilities of Historians
Historians:
Gather historical evidence.
4
Analyze sources.
Interpret information.
Construct historical narratives.
Explain the significance of events.
They attempt to reconstruct a meaningful and organized representation of the past.
Determining Whose History Is Being Studied
Historians must determine whose experiences they are investigating.
Possible perspectives include:
Political leaders
Common citizens
Women
Indigenous groups
Religious communities
Workers
Minority groups
The perspective chosen influences the questions asked, sources consulted, and
conclusions reached.
Historical Significance
Historical significance refers to the importance assigned to historical events.
Historians determine significance by asking:
Why is the event important?
How did it affect society?
What lessons can be learned?
Historical significance helps connect the past to the present.
IV. HISTORIOGRAPHY
Definition
The practice of documenting history is referred to as historiography.
Additional Description
Historiography is both:
1. The writing of history.
2. The study of how history has been written.
It involves transforming evidence into an organized and meaningful historical account.
Traditional Historiography
Traditionally, historians gathered information from:
Libraries
Archives
Manuscripts
Government records
Letters
5
Diaries
These materials served as evidence for writing historical narratives.
Modern Historiography
Modern historical writing extends beyond document analysis and incorporates methods
from related disciplines.
Archaeology
The study of human history through material remains.
Examples:
Pottery
Buildings
Weapons
Tools
Jewelry
Geography
The study of places and environments.
Geography helps historians understand:
Settlement patterns
Trade routes
Migration
Environmental influences
These disciplines provide additional evidence for reconstructing the past.
V. THE LIMITATIONS OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE
Definition
The incompleteness of historical records poses a significant challenge to our knowledge
of history.
Reasons for Historical Incompleteness
1. Lack of Documentation
Many events were never recorded.
Large portions of the population throughout history could not read or write, causing
many experiences to go undocumented.
2. Destruction of Evidence
Historical records may be lost through:
Wars
Fires
Floods
Earthquakes
Human neglect
6
3. Selective Preservation
Not all records survive equally.
Some records are preserved while others disappear, creating gaps in historical
knowledge.
Surviving Records
Historians rely on surviving evidence such as:
Letters
Diaries
Government records
Newspapers
Photographs
Artifacts
These records provide only a partial view of the past.
Bias in Historical Records
Historical records may be:
Biased
Incomplete
Selective
The people who created records often had their own beliefs, interests, and
perspectives.
Therefore, historians must critically evaluate all sources.
VI. HISTORY-AS-ACTUALITY AND HISTORY-AS-RECORD
History-as-Actuality
History-as-actuality refers to everything that actually happened in the past.
It includes all actions, events, experiences, and thoughts that occurred throughout
human history.
Because not everything was recorded, historians can never completely know history-as-
actuality.
History-as-Record
History-as-record refers to the surviving evidence of the past.
Examples include:
Documents
Diaries
Artifacts
Photographs
Government records
Historians study these records to reconstruct the past.
7
Relationship Between the Two
History-as-record is only a small portion of history-as-actuality.
Thus, historians use surviving evidence to understand what actually happened.
VII. HISTORY AS THE SUBJECTIVE PROCESS OF RE-CREATION
Definition
History is considered a subjective process of re-creation because historians reconstruct
the past using available evidence and interpretation.
Why History Is Subjective
Unlike scientists who can directly observe many natural phenomena, historians cannot
directly observe the past.
They must rely on:
Documents
Artifacts
Testimonies
Inferences
Because evidence is incomplete, interpretation becomes necessary.
Human Experiences Across Time
Historians recognize that human experiences may be:
Comparable
People across different periods may share similar experiences such as:
Family life
Work
Conflict
Cooperation
Different
Experiences may vary according to:
Culture
Religion
Politics
Economics
Time
Place
These differences must be considered when interpreting history.
The Role of Inference
8
An inference is a logical conclusion drawn from available evidence.
Historians use inference when direct evidence is unavailable.
Inference helps fill gaps in historical records.
VIII. VERISIMILITUDE
Definition
Verisimilitude refers to the quality of being realistic, believable, and close to historical
reality.
Purpose of Verisimilitude
Historians aim to produce accounts that are:
Accurate
Credible
Logical
Evidence-based
Although complete certainty is impossible, historians strive to achieve the closest
possible representation of the past.
IX. HISTORICAL METHOD
Definition
The historical method is the systematic process used to investigate, evaluate, and
reconstruct the past.
It involves the careful examination and analysis of historical documents and artifacts.
Purpose of the Historical Method
The historical method helps historians:
Gather evidence.
Verify information.
Analyze sources.
Construct historical narratives.
Produce reliable interpretations.
X. HISTORICAL ANALYSIS
Definition
Historical analysis is a vital component of the historical method.
It involves the systematic examination, evaluation, interpretation, and organization of
historical evidence.
Purpose of Historical Analysis
9
Historical analysis helps historians:
Understand historical events.
Determine causes and effects.
Evaluate evidence.
Distinguish facts from opinions.
Construct reliable interpretations.
Without historical analysis, history would simply be a collection of disconnected facts.
Steps in Historical Analysis
Step 1: Choosing a Subject for Investigation
The historian selects a topic or historical problem to study.
Examples:
Jose Rizal's Life
The Philippine Revolution
World War II
Step 2: Gathering Potential Sources of Information
The historian collects evidence related to the topic.
Examples:
Primary Sources
Letters
Diaries
Speeches
Government records
Secondary Sources
Textbooks
Research articles
Historical analyses
Step 3: Scrutinizing the Authenticity of Sources
The historian examines whether sources are genuine and reliable.
Questions include:
Who created the source?
When was it created?
Why was it created?
Can it be trusted?
Step 4: Extracting Reliable and Significant Information
The historian identifies useful information from verified sources.
Examples:
Names
Dates
Locations
Causes
Consequences
10
Only reliable information is used in historical interpretation.
Importance of Historical Analysis
Historical analysis:
Promotes accuracy.
Strengthens historical interpretations.
Ensures evidence-based conclusions.
Forms the foundation of historiography.
XI. SYNTHESIS AND HISTORIOGRAPHY
Synthesis
Synthesis refers to combining information from multiple sources into a coherent
explanation.
Historians organize facts, interpretations, and evidence to create a complete
understanding of historical events.
Relationship Between Analysis and Synthesis
Analysis
Examines evidence.
Breaks information into parts.
Evaluates details.
Synthesis
Combines information.
Connects ideas.
Produces a complete narrative.
The two processes are closely related and cannot be completely separated.
Historiography as the Final Product
The combination of information obtained through historical analysis results in
historiography.
Historiography is the final written account of history produced through:
1. Research
2. Source collection
3. Source evaluation
4. Historical analysis
5. Interpretation
6. Synthesis
LESSON 2: SOURCES OF HISTORICAL DATA
11
I. MEANING OF HISTORICAL SOURCES
Historical information is obtained from objects, relics, testimonies, and stories that
have survived from the past.
Key Idea
Historical sources include anything that provides evidence about the past.
They may be:
Physical objects (artifacts, remains)
Written documents
Oral testimonies (stories, interviews)
Important Explanation
A source is used by historians to:
Prove that an event actually happened
Help interpret what happened and why it happened
👉 Simple difference:
Source = evidence
Historical interpretation = explanation/meaning of the evidence
II. TYPES OF HISTORICAL SOURCES
Historical sources are divided into:
1. Written Sources
2. Non-Written Sources
A. WRITTEN SOURCES OF HISTORY
Written sources are documents or texts that contain recorded information about the
past.
They are classified into 3 main categories:
1. Narrative or Literary Sources
These are written in story form or descriptive style.
Characteristics:
Tell stories or accounts of events
Created for different purposes (information, persuasion, entertainment)
May include personal opinions or interpretations
Examples:
Chronicles
Diaries
Memoirs
Novels
Pamphlets
12
Speeches written as texts
Hagiographies (lives of saints or important figures)
Purpose:
They aim to:
Inform
Persuade
Entertain
Teach lessons
Express beliefs or ideas
Important Note:
Even if they are fictional or artistic, they can still reflect historical ideas and culture.
2. Diplomatic or Juridical Sources
These are legal documents used to establish official records.
Characteristics:
Highly formal
Often sealed or authenticated
Considered reliable historical evidence
Follow legal rules and structure
Examples:
Charters
Contracts
Wills
Land titles
Court documents
Government decrees
Sources from authorities:
Kings
Governments
Courts
Legislatures
Popes
Importance:
They are useful because they:
Prove legal transactions
Show political and economic systems
Are often considered trustworthy sources
3. Social Documents
These are records that show social, economic, political, and legal life.
Examples:
Census records
Property registers
Government reports
13
Parliamentary records
Municipal accounts
Research reports
Importance:
They help historians understand:
Population
Economy
Government systems
Social conditions
B. NON-WRITTEN SOURCES OF HISTORY
Non-written sources include material evidence and oral testimonies.
1. Material Evidence (Archaeological Sources)
These are physical objects left by people in the past.
Importance:
They help historians understand:
Daily life of people
Culture and traditions
Technology of the past
Trade and economy
Key Explanation:
Artifacts are NOT the actual events, but they are proof that those events happened
or existed.
Additional Information from Archaeology
Artifacts found in different places may show trade and exchange
Garbage pits can still contain valuable historical evidence
Coins show economic systems and government control
Excavations can be accidental or planned
2. Visual Evidence
These include images and recordings of the past.
Examples:
Paintings
Drawings
Photographs
Films
Etchings
Importance:
They provide:
Visual representation of historical events
Clues about culture, clothing, and environment
3. Oral Evidence (Verbal Testimony)
14
These are spoken accounts of the past.
Examples:
Interviews
Folk songs
Legends
Sagas
Oral traditions
Importance:
They are useful especially when written records are not available.
However:
They may change over time
They may contain bias or exaggeration
III. PRIMARY VS SECONDARY SOURCES
1. PRIMARY SOURCES
Definition:
Primary sources are original, firsthand accounts created during or near the time of
the event.
Characteristics:
Direct evidence
Original information
No interpretation (or minimal interpretation)
Examples:
Diaries
Letters
Speeches
Photographs
Government records
Newspapers (reporting events)
Interviews with witnesses
Maps
Posters
Artifacts
Paintings from the period
Importance:
Primary sources are important because they:
Provide direct evidence
Are closest to the actual event
Are the foundation of historical research
2. SECONDARY SOURCES
Definition:
15
Secondary sources are materials created after the event, based on primary sources.
Characteristics:
Interpret historical events
Analyze or explain primary sources
Written by people who did not directly experience the event
Examples:
History books
Biographies
Journal articles
Reviews
Literary criticism
Research papers
Importance:
Secondary sources help:
Explain primary sources
Provide analysis and interpretation
Give broader understanding of events
IV. SIMPLE COMPARISON
Type Meaning Example
Primary Source Firsthand evidence Diary, letter, photo
Secondary Source Interpretation of primary sources History book, biography
Written Source Recorded documents Books, records
Non-written Source Physical/oral evidence Artifacts, interviews
V. KEY EXAM REMINDERS
✔ Historical sources = evidence of the past
✔ Artifacts = physical proof of history
✔ Written sources = documents and texts
✔ Non-written sources = objects + oral history
✔ Primary = original
✔ Secondary = interpretation
ONE-LINE SUMMARY
Historical sources are all written, oral, and physical evidence used by historians
to reconstruct, interpret, and understand the past.
LESSON 3: HISTORICAL CRITICISMS
I. MEANING OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM
16
Historical criticism is the process of understanding the underlying circumstances
behind early writings and historical documents.
It helps historians:
Understand the true meaning of a text
Know the context of its creation
Evaluate whether it is trustworthy or not
Main Idea
Historical criticism focuses on:
What the text really means
Why it was written
When, where, and by whom it was written
II. MAIN GOALS OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM
Historical criticism has two main goals:
1. Original Meaning of the Text
To determine the literal meaning (sensus literalis historicus) of the document in its
historical context.
👉 This means understanding:
What the author really meant
What message was intended for the original readers
2. Reconstruct Historical Context
To rebuild the historical situation in which:
The author lived
The audience lived
The document was written
👉 This helps historians understand:
Culture
Beliefs
Political situation
Social conditions
III. TWO TYPES OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM
Historical criticism is divided into:
1. External Criticism
2. Internal Criticism
A. EXTERNAL CRITICISM (AUTHENTICITY)
17
Definition
External criticism is the process of determining whether a document is authentic (real)
or fake.
It focuses on:
Origin of the document
Authorship
Date of creation
Physical form of the source
Main Goal
👉 To answer:
“Is this document real or forged?”
Techniques of External Criticism
1. Diplomatic Criticism
Studies the form and structure of documents
Examines official patterns used in legal or government records
2. Paleographical Criticism
Studies handwriting, script, and language
Considers the time and place the document was created
👉 Helps determine:
Whether writing style matches the historical period
Whether the document has been altered
Other Methods of External Criticism
1. Comparison with Other Sources
Historians compare the document with:
Other reliable documents
Similar historical accounts
Records from the same period
👉 If details match, the document is more likely authentic.
2. Study of Physical Materials
Historians examine:
Paper type
Ink
Writing tools
Chemical composition
Example:
18
Paper was rare before the 15th century in Europe
Printing press was not used before the 15th century
Typewriters only existed in the 19th century
👉 If a document claims to be older but uses modern materials, it is likely fake.
3. Handwriting and Signatures
Historians check:
Handwriting style
Signatures
Seals
Letterheads
Watermarks
They compare them with verified samples.
4. Language and Writing Style
Experts look for:
Grammar errors
Spelling mistakes
Idioms
Punctuation style
👉 Inconsistencies may suggest forgery.
5. Anachronisms (Very Important)
An anachronism is something that does not belong to the correct time period.
Examples:
Mentioning an event that happened AFTER the author’s death
Using modern words in an ancient document
Referring to technologies not yet invented
👉 These are strong signs of forgery.
6. Alibi Check
Historians check if:
The author could physically be in that place at that time
👉 If not, the document is suspicious.
7. Provenance (Origin/Custody)
Provenance refers to:
Where the document came from
Who kept it over time
👉 If found in a trusted archive or family record, it is more likely authentic.
Importance of External Criticism
19
Confirms authenticity
Detects forged documents
Protects historical accuracy
Ensures reliable sources
B. INTERNAL CRITICISM (RELIABILITY)
Definition
Internal criticism evaluates the truthfulness and reliability of the content inside a
document.
Main Goal
👉 To answer:
“Is the information inside the document true?”
Focus of Internal Criticism
It studies:
Meaning of the message
Accuracy of facts
Credibility of the author
Possible bias or influence
What Historians Examine
1. Credibility of the Author
Is the author trustworthy?
Did the author witness the event?
Is the author knowledgeable?
2. Knowledge of the Author
Historians check:
How much the author knew about the event
Whether the author was present during the event
3. Bias and Influence
Historians consider:
Political influence
Religious beliefs
Personal opinions
Social background
👉 These may affect how facts are presented
4. Accuracy of Facts
20
Historians verify:
Did the event really happen?
Are the details correct?
Are there contradictions with other sources?
Importance of Internal Criticism
Ensures truthfulness of historical facts
Helps identify bias
Improves accuracy of interpretation
Prevents misleading conclusions
IV. TEST OF AUTHENTICITY
Historians use scientific and investigative methods similar to police work.
1. Material Testing
Historians examine:
Paper type
Ink composition
Writing tools
👉 To check if they match the historical period.
2. Date Estimation
Historians determine:
When the document was made
Whether materials match that time period
3. Chemical Analysis
Ink and materials are tested for:
Age consistency
Historical accuracy
4. Cross-Checking with History
Historians compare:
Events mentioned in document
Known historical facts
5. Location and Context Check
They check:
Was the author in that place?
Does the event timeline make sense?
V. IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM
21
Historical criticism is important because it:
Detects fake documents
Ensures historical truth
Improves research accuracy
Helps build reliable history
Separates fact from fiction
Strengthens historical interpretation