THE UNIVERSITY OF DODOMA
COLLAGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS (COBE)
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
COURSE CODE: AF 211
COURSE NAME: COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: MR. DAVID MUSHI
NATURE OF WORK: INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
S/N NAME REG. NUMBER COURSE SEX SIGN
1. MARTHA BOSCO ENOCK T24-03-19560 BCOM-FIN F
1
a) OVERHEAD ANALYSIS SHEET
Production Department Service Department
Basis of
Apportion Maintenan
Overheads ment Amount Cutting Shaping Stores ce
Total Direct
Overheads allocation 363,000 140,000 160,000 35,000 28,000
Factory Rent Floor area 525,000 270,000 180,000 45,000 30,000
Factory
building
Insurance Floor area 70,000 36,000 24,000 6,000 4,000
Value of
the plants
Plant and and
Machinery Ins machinery 39,000 30,000 5,000 2,500 1,500
Value of
Plant and the plants
Machinery and
Depreciation machinery 58,500 45,000 7,500 3,750 2,250
Canteen Number of
Subsidy employees 150,000 51,000 90,000 6,000 3,000
572,000 466,500 98,250 68,750
SECONDARY APPORTIONMENT
Basis of
Department Apportionment
Maintenance hour
Maintenance required 37,125 27,500 4,125 68,750
Number of stores
Store requisition 68,250 34,125 102,375
1,205,500
Grand Total
b)
Overhead rate =
𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡
𝑀𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
Cutting Department:
Machine hours = 12,000 hours
Budgeted overhead cost = K 677,375
So,
Overhead rate= 677,375
12000
= K 56.45 per machine hour
Therefore, the overhead absorption rate for the cutting department is
K 56.45 per machine hour.
Shaping Department:
Overhead rate = 𝐵𝑢𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡
𝐿𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
Labour hours = 15,000 hours
Budgeted overhead cost = K 528,125
So,
Overhead rate= 528,125
15000
= K 35.21 per labour hour
Therefore, the most appropriate overhead absorption rate for the shaping department is
K 35.21 per labour hour.
c)
Cutting department;
𝑶𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒃𝒆𝒅 = 𝑨𝒄𝒕𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒅 × 𝑶𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆
Overhead absorbed = 14000 hours × K56.45 per hour
Overhead absorbed = K790, 300
Therefore this is over-absorbed overhead since absorbed overhead > actual overhead. It is over the
actual overhead by K258,800
Shaping department;
overhead absorbed = 16000 hours × K35.21 per hour
= K563,360
This is also Over-absorbed overhead since absorbed overhead > actual overhead. It is over the actual
overhead by K157,860
2
a)
LIFO
DATE RECEIPTS ISSUE BALANCE
Qty Rate Amount Qty Rate Amount Qty Rate Amount
1st Aug 1000 9.50 9500 - - - 1000 9.50 9500
15th Aug 900 11.00 9900 1900 10.21 19400
19th Aug 800 11.00 8800 1100 9.64 10,600
20th Aug 600 10.50 6300 - - - 1700 9.94 16900
26th Aug 600@10.50 10.50 12,150 500 9.5 4,750
100@11.00
11.00
500@9.50
9.50
Total Amount Charged to Production
8800 + 12,150 = 20,950
Total Value of Inventory Transaction
4,750
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
DATE RECEIPTS ISSUE BALANCE
QTY RATE AMOUNT QTY RATE AMOUNT QTY RATE AMOUNT
1st Aug 1000 9.50 9500 - - - 1000 9.50 9500
15th Aug 900 11.00 9900 - - - 1900 1021 19400
19th Aug 800 10.21 8168 1100 10.21 11232
20th Aug 600 10.50 6300 - - - 1700 10.31 17532
26th Aug 1200 10.31 12372 500 10.32 5160
Total Amount Charged to Production
8168 + 12,372 = 20,540
Total Value of Inventory Transaction
5,160
FIFO
DATE RECEIPTS ISSUE BALANCE
QTY RATE AMOUNTQTY RATE AMOUNT QTY RATE AMOUNT
1st Aug 1000 9.50 9500 1000 9.50 9500
15th Aug 900 11.00 9900 1900 10.21 19400
19th Aug 800@9.50 9.50 7600 200@ 9.50 10.73 11800
900@11.00
20th Aug 600 10.50 6300 - - - 1700 10.65 18100
26th Aug 12850 500 10.50 5250
Total Amount Charged to Production
7600 + 1900 + 9900 + 1050 = 20,450
Total Value of Inventory is
5,250
b)
Advantages of FIFO
It is a simple method to understand and operate.
Closing stock reflects recent or current market prices.
Issues are priced at actual historical cost.
Disadvantages of FIFO
Time consuming as price fluctuate frequently.
The state and costs of units are large.
Overstates profit during rising prices.
Advantages of LIFO (Last in First out)
Very useful when prices are mixing.
Meeting current cost with current revenue.
Prevents and avoid overstatement of print during inflation.
Disadvantages of LIFO
Not allowed or permitted under some accounting standards.
Not suitable for perishable materials
Advantages of Weighted Average costing
Easy to calculate and operate.
It is practical and best expensive inventory system.
It's a reliable costing method useful to management.
Smoothen price fluctuates.
Disadvantages of Weighted Average costing
Does not represent the actual cost of specific batteries?
Requires frequent recalculation.
Issues and closing stock are not at current cost.
Less suitable for material regulation strict batch control.
c)
WIP = Equivalent units x cost per completed units.
Given; cost per completed = 30.50 units
But,
Equivalent units = Number counts x percentage of completion
Where as ;
600 units = 40% complete
400 units = 60% complete
300 units = 80% complete
So according to equivalent units formula,
600 = 600 × 40 = 240 equivalent units
400= 400 × 60 = 240 equivalent units
300= 300 × 80 = 240 equivalent units
TOTAL EQUIVALENT UNIT= 720 equivalent units
WIP VALUE = 720 × 30.50 = 21,960
Therefore, The Work-In-Progress value is 21,960
a)
Incentive scheme is a formal program designed to motivate employees, or team, to achieve specific desired
outcomes by offering rewards.
Purpose of an incentive scheme
Motivate employee to increase productivity.
Encourage workers to work faster and better.
Reward employees for higher output and efficiency.
The rewards and pay are linked directly to performance of each individual or team.
Reduce unit out of production.
b)
Data Given
Basic working week = 38 hours
Overtime premium = 80% of normal rate
Pay rate of grade A = R22 per hour
Pay rate of grade B = Tsh / 8 per hour
Overtime pay = overtime hours × overtime rate
Overtime rate = Normal rate × 120%.
Normal pay = Normal hours × normal pay rate for Grade A.
Normal pay = 38 hours × TZS 22 per hour
Normal Pay= 836 TZS
For Grade B
Normal Pay= 38 hours × 18 TZS per hour
= 684 TZS
Employees Hours worked Normal Hours Overtime
1 41 38 3
2 44 38 6
3 40 38 2
4 38 38 0
5 38 38 0
6 45 38 7
So no we calculate for every employee
Employee 1 – GRADE A
Normal pay = 836
Overtime rate = 22 × 120% = 26.40
Overtime Pay = 26.40 × 3 = 79.20
Total pay = TZS 915.20
Employee 2 – GRADE A
Normal pay = 38 × 22 = 836
Overtime pay = 6 × 26.40 = 158.40
Total pay = TZS 994.40
Therefore,
Employee Total Normal Pay
1 915.20
2 994.40
3 727.20
4 684
5 684
6 1020.80
c)
Given;
Standard time = 20 minutes per unit
Grade A hourly rate = TZS 22
Enhancement = 6%
From,
Standard piecework rate= Basic piece rate × (100% + Enhancement)
But,
Standard time per unit (hour) = 20 ÷ 60 = 𝟏⁄𝟑hour
Basic piece rate = 22 × 𝟏⁄𝟑= 7.33 per unit
Standard piecework rate = 7.33 × 6% = 7.77 per unit
Therefore the standard piece work rate is TZS 7.77 per unit
3
d)
Pay = Units Produced × piecework rate
Employee Units Produced Rate Pay (TZS)
1 170 7.77 1320.90
2 170 7.77 1320.90
3 150 7.77 1165.50
4 150 7.77 1165.50
5 160 7.77 1243.20
6 180 7.77 1398.60
a)
DIRECT COSTS FACTORY OFFICE & ADMINITION
SELLING & DISTRIBUTION
OVERHEADS OVERHEADS
Salesmen’s salary 625
Advertising 625
Warehouse charges 250
Carriage outward 187.50
Manager’s salary 2,500
Office stationery 250
Telephone charges 62.5
Office lighting 250
Postage & 125
telegrams
Rent – office 1,250
Depreciation –
625
office premises
Consumable stores 1,250
Wages of foreman 1,250
Electric power 250
Factory lighting 750
Storekeeper’s
500
wages
Oil and water 250
Rent – factory 2,500
Repairs – factory
1,750
plant
Depreciation –
250
factory plant
Direct materials 50,000
Direct labour 15,000
Prime Cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labour = TZS 65,000
Total Factory Overheads = TZS 8,750
Factory Cost = Prime Cost + Factory Overheads = 65,000 + 8,750 = TZS 73,750
Total office Overheads = TZS 5,062.50
Cost of Production = Factory Cost + Office Overheads
= 73,750 + 5,062.50
= TZS 78,812.50
Total selling and distribution Overheads = TZS 1,687.50
Cost of Sales = Cost of Production + Selling & Distribution Overheads
= 78,812.50 + 1,687.50
= TZS 80,500.00
Profit = Sales – Cost of Sales
= 94,750 – 80,500
= TZS 14,250
b)
Cost of credit
Is anything for which costs are measured it can be Products, services, department or projects
Cost Unit
Is the unit for the products or services related to which costs are ascertained from example per unit, per kg,
per lbs.
Cost centre
This is a production or service location, function, administration or item where costs are measured but
revenues are
Not directly earned, only costs are measured not profits.
Revenue centre
This is a location, activity or items where it's only responsible for generating revenue, and not controlling
costs
5
a)
Cost Allocation Cost Apportionment
Charging whole cost directly to a cost centre or
Sharing a cost among several cost centres
cost unit
Used when cost is clearly identifiable Used when cost is common
No estimation involved Based on fair basis (floor area, labour hours etc.)
Cost Reduction Cost Control
Permanent reduction in unit cost Ensuring costs do not exceed standards
Forward-looking Ongoing monitoring
Focuses on efficiency improvement Focuses on prevention of waste
b)
The following are the steps of Cost accounting Cycle;
Collection of cost data
Classification of costs
Allocation and apportionment of overheads
Absorption of overheads
Cost ascertainment
Cost analysis and interpretation
reporting to management
C)
Product A (TZS) B (TZS) C (TZS)
Direct material 3,000 6,000 8,000
Direct wages 4,000 4,000 10,000
Variable overheads 3,000 5,000 7,000
Total Variable Cost 10,000 15,000 25,000
Selling price 18,000 25,000 48,000
But,
Contribution = Selling price – Variable cost
Product Contribution per unit (TZS)
A 18,000 – 10,000 = 8,000
B 25,000 – 15,000 = 10,000
C 48,000 – 25,000 = 23,000
Period 1 total Contributions
Product Units Contribution/unit Total Contribution
A 10,000 8,000 80,000,000
B 10,000 10,000 100,000,000
C 10,000 23,000 230,000,000
Total Contribution (Period I)
= 410,000,000
Profit = Contribution – Fixed costs
= 410,000,000 – 135,000
= 409,865,000
Period 2 Total Contributions
Product Units Contribution/unit Total Contribution
A 20,000 8,000 160,000,000
B 13,000 10,000 130,000,000
C 5,000 23,000 115,000,000
Total Contribution (Period II)
= 405,000,000
Profit = 405,000,000 – 135,000
= 404,865,000
The following are the reasons profit fell Despite Higher Sales
Fixed cost remained Constant
Increase in lower contribution products
Changes in Sales for Product C
REFERENCES
Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2018).
Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (16th ed.). Pearson Education.
Drury, C. (2015).
Management and cost accounting (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.