PYQ
PYQ
'Reresource
Military
external& z V D-Disaster
internal ; 4Es C+ Cyber
Economic
both state H-
Health
·
Environmental Political I
actors
ecurity
·
>
-
· warming
Ethnic
war) --
Strategy
Case
study
:
and Naxalism
(Strait of Hormuz crisis) Violence)
(Manipur class)
Energy security
M
Ethic
& security Cexplained in
good -Information
IPMGKAY +
fortified
Rice) warfare
Additional
top .
Sindoor
Misinformation]
keywords
(Brahmaputra
L - Resource ,
Hearth I
security
Cone Health &
Mission
L ~
Indus water
treaty
Strategic Political
Nationaltest
forces]
-Armed
vision
& ,
Diplomats and
Management of
-
maslinges
codification Modalities -
future of forces .
ploiv
& -Goals ,
Interests
L
GNSD calculations
-How do
Responses and Redlines they
respond ?
of
Culture
L
and
Enterplay of force accountability
diplomacy
L
y Coordination
federal
-
Clear Mechanisms
Shirshankas Menon
Lack
whesion
of
·
·
Deliberate Non disclosure
- Clarity of Responsibility
Accountability
decision
Algorithmic emergencies
1C814, Mumbai
Making in ex
- :
past
previous committees have recommended
Kalgic
Review C, NC
taskforce
>
-
Threat
perception needs
Integration
-
Bluring lines 2 5
,
.
front wasRawat
Bipin
-
New domain
Integrating Civil
society Ajit Doval
- -
Need Now
Balance between Militarised Civilians and Civilised
Military
Comprehensive National Power
USA China Pak
examples of foreign powers
- .
.
, ,
Future
essential
Before Reform- cast before the horse' MM Narvane
Rationalised
jointness in procurement weaponsdevelopment
-
Challenges foaming
in
ideology
, goals
>
framing updation
, execution ->
feedback
I
& Y y
&
Needs
Strategie
a divergent Civil loss
of strategic car
·
flexibility
goasam Military
relations
regular
updates ex :Israel tanks.
jopolis
y
Counter view
Conclusion
·
Not written -
doesn't
conflict global
ridden
landscape
·
Doval doctrine
S double
squeze
.
Value Addition
"The absence
of a written
security Republic Day 2026 : Tri-services
that
strategy
the
doesn't mean
"
Table :
Op sindoor
country CDSdoesn't have
General Anil
one .
Keywords b) No Tolerence
) No distinction
for
between
Nuclear Blackmail
Terros
not
just reactive capacity
·
security via
soft power buffer
Diagram
·
Avoiding reactive
posturing
·
First
· not a static
guide book Processes
·
flexibility
Nuclear Doctrine
Security
Launch Doctrine in 2025
25
years of of Nuclear
#
Features :
No Fist Use
Policy
Massive retaliation to
just strike
O Nuclear retaliatory strikes can
only be
Political Executive
Counsel
authorised by Political
Council
/
Council
① Non-use
nuclear states .
of
nuclear
weapons against non-
V V
PM chaired NSA
Biological attacks <
Chemical
In case
of or :
>
-
verifiable and
non-discriminatory nuclear
disarmament . Criticism
①
Strategic Restraint posture
CMD lacks
flexibility in a
dynamic
threat environment China's MIRV)
Relevance Ceg ,
①
promotes strategic stability Delay in retaliation due to political control
and
CMD iscost-effective ①
potrays a
defensive non-retaliatory
Responsible nucleas Stewardship (Political Control stance .
Global reputation as a
responsible pows
forward :
① Red line
against Pakistan's Nass tactical nukes
way while
① Preserving
Character lending flexibility
Doctane Review Commission
Strategic
International Position
of India : Issue
periodic white
papers (like
D Not
party of NPT 3 >
-
discriminatory
China's
defense white paper to
signal
Didnot (TBT
sign in nature posture updates.
South Asia Nuclear Risk
Voluntary IAEA
safe gauds on Civil
facilities
Push
for a
diplomacy.
Value Addition
J
Quotes Inter-continental
Ballistic Missiles
in
responsibility ,
restraint and credibility"
-
MEA White Paper Fig : India's Nuclear Triad
Recent Context
Keywords
,
Counter-Value
①
Second
Targeting
strike
capabilly
-
Escalation Dominance
① Nuclear
Signaling
O Nuclear Blackmail
Doctrinal
Nuclear
Ambiguity
overhang