Document
Document
_________________________________________________________________________________________
[Link] 1531
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
decreased motivation, disengagement from internet, digital devices, and conducive study
academic work, and diminished well-being. environments across socioeconomic groups.
Many Filipino students lacked stable connectivity
Research on academic burnout shows that its
or sufficient technological resources, which
symptoms extend beyond poor academic
negatively affected their ability to participate
performance. Students may experience a
meaningfully in remote learning. The shift also
pervasive lack of interest in school, difficulties
created a heavier cognitive load, as students
continuing class attendance, reduced
navigated new technologies, increased
participation in activities, and a pervasive sense
workloads, and greater self-directed study
that academic tasks are meaningless (Yang &
demands, all without the social support and
Farn). Burnout also manifests socially as affected
structure provided by traditional classrooms
students may develop negative judgments about
(Alibudbud, 2021; Barrot et al., 2021). Moreover,
themselves and others, heighten tendencies to
these pandemic learning environments have been
blame external factors for personal challenges,
linked to heightened anxiety, fatigue, and reduced
and exhibit mistrust in social interactions.
academic outcomes, further contributing to
Prolonged burnout is associated with health
students’ psychological distress.
impairments, disrupted sleep, and impaired
concentration, potentially leading to long-term Local research confirms that online learning
academic disengagement. modalities have presented significant challenges.
These include factors associated with elevated
In the Philippines, scholarship on academic
burnout among students during the pandemic
burnout remains limited, but emerging research
such as increased academic demands, prolonged
highlights its relevance. Recent studies have
screen time, and workload overload(Palma et al.,
documented moderate to high risks of burnout
2023). Such conditions are compounded by
among Filipino college students, particularly
limited teacher-student interaction and the lack
during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ramos et al.,
of immediate academic support that face-to-face
2021). Moreover, students engaged in online
education traditionally provides. These
learning have been shown to experience burnout
unprecedented disruptions to the Philippine
syndrome, underscoring the need to understand
education system underline the urgent need to
context-specific contributing factors (Robeniol,
investigate how academic burnout manifests
2023; Palma et al., 2023). Another Philippine-
among students in remote and hybrid learning
based investigation reported significant
contexts. Understanding the nature and extent of
associations between online screen media
burnout during these shifts is critical, as burnout
exposure, which is a proxy for prolonged remote
can undermine student motivation, weaken
learning, and burnout symptoms among senior
student–teacher relationships, and adversely
high students, suggesting that extended reliance
affect the overall quality of learning. Through
on digital devices during pandemic-era learning
careful examination of how pandemic-related
contributed to psychological strain.
educational practices have contributed to
The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally burnout, this study provides insights that can
disrupted the Philippine educational system, inform strategies to improve instructional
intensifying existing structural challenges and practices, manage academic workloads, and
imposing new ones. With nationwide lockdowns support student well-being. The findings are
beginning in March 2020, in-person classes were expected to help educators and policymakers
suspended and replaced with distance learning devise interventions to mitigate burnout and
modalities, including online platforms, printed promote a more resilient and equitable learning
modules, and blended approaches. This abrupt environment.
shift, often implemented with minimal
Objectives
preparation, exacerbated inequalities in access to
education due to uneven availability of reliable The following are the objectives of the study:
[Link] 1532
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
a. determine the level of academic burnout b. determine the general self-efficacy of the
experienced by the respondents, specifically on respondents during the pandemic; and
emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic
c. establish the significant relationship
inefficacy;
between self-efficacy and academic burnout.
[Link] 1533
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
to determine its cultural and contextual suitability who experience the different dimensions of
for Filipino learners. The experts assessed burnout, including their general self-efficacy.
whether the items were understandable, culturally
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). This
sensitive, and relevant to students’ academic
was used to establish the relationship between
experiences in the Philippines. The Cronback’s
general self-efficacy and academic burnout
alpha of the scale is 0.86.
experienced by the respondents.
e. Statistical Treatment
Results and Discussion
Several statistical measures were availed of in this
Extent of Burnout experienced by the
study. These include the following:
respondents
Weighted Mean. This was used in
The Maslach Burnout Inventory Scale (MBI) was
presenting the dimensions of academic burnout
used in determining the level of burnout
experienced by the respondents.
experienced by the respondents. It contains 15
Frequency and Percent. These were used items that evaluate the three dimensions of
to present the distribution of the respondents burnout: emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and
academic inefficacy.
Emotional Exhaustion
[Link] 1534
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
process, in which emotional exhaustion develops further support this pattern, showing that while
in response to sustained demands rather than students often report moderate emotional
appearing abruptly at extreme levels (Maslach & exhaustion linked to academic stress, effective
Jackson, 1981). Previous research likewise coping strategies, social support, and teacher
indicates that moderate emotional exhaustion is a guidance play a crucial role in sustaining resilience
common response to academic pressures and (Alvarez, 2021). Together, these findings
does not necessarily lead to disengagement, underscore the importance of early, supportive
particularly when protective factors are present interventions to address emotional fatigue and
(Schaufeli et al., 2002; Salmela-Aro & Read, promote students’ long-term well-being and
2017). Studies in Asian and Philippine contexts academic success.
[Link] 1535
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
studies (Schaufeli et al., 2002), while those with prolonged demands can heighten emotional
persistently high exhaustion are more likely to exhaustion among vulnerable students (Serafica
exhibit reduced engagement and psychological & Muria, 2023; Datu & Mateo, 2020). These
distress (Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2013). findings reinforce the need for proactive
Philippine-based studies further highlight the role institutional responses to address emotional
of resilience and institutional support in buffering exhaustion before it progresses to more severe
academic stress, while emphasizing that burnout.
CYNICISM
[Link] 1536
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Academic Inefficacy
[Link] 1537
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 5 indicates that academic inefficacy among ensure that confidence is sustained as academic
the respondents is very mild, reflecting a generally demands increase. These findings are consistent
positive self-evaluation of academic competence with burnout theory, which conceptualizes
and productivity. Students reported only reduced personal accomplishment as a later-stage
occasional doubts about their effectiveness and dimension that remains low when individuals
contribution during class, while negative self- perceive themselves as effective and competent
perceptions, lack of interest in learning, and (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001). They are
inability to solve academic problems were further supported by self-efficacy theory, which
minimal. The very low overall mean suggests that emphasizes that strong efficacy beliefs promote
most respondents perceive themselves as capable persistence, resilience, and effective coping
learners who can address academic challenges (Bandura, 1997). Empirical studies likewise
effectively, indicating resilience and adaptive demonstrate that higher self-efficacy is associated
learning behaviors. This minimal level of with lower levels of academic burnout,
academic inefficacy functions as a protective particularly academic inefficacy (Schaufeli et al.,
factor against burnout, as students who view 2002; Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2013).
themselves as competent are more likely to Philippine-based research similarly highlights the
remain motivated and engaged. The results role of self-efficacy in fostering persistence and
suggest that respondents are able to connect their adaptive coping among students (Galan, 2011).
academic experiences with personal growth and These findings underscore the importance of
goal attainment, thereby buffering against instructional practices that strengthen self-
feelings of reduced personal accomplishment. efficacy and mastery experiences to sustain
Although inefficacy is generally low, the presence students’ confidence and prevent the progression
of occasional self-doubt highlights the of burnout.
importance of continuous academic support to
[Link] 1538
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
targeted interventions, including mentoring, skills academic contexts (Bandura, 1997). Empirical
training, and individualized feedback, to rebuild studies likewise demonstrate that higher
confidence and prevent negative effects on academic self-efficacy is associated with lower
performance and well-being. The results are burnout, particularly inefficacy (Schaufeli et al.,
consistent with burnout theory, which 2002; Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2013).
conceptualizes reduced personal Philippine-based research similarly highlights the
accomplishment as a dimension that intensifies role of self-efficacy in promoting persistence and
when individuals perceive themselves as adaptive coping among students (Galan, 2011).
ineffective (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001). These findings underscore the importance of
They are further supported by self-efficacy instructional and support practices that
theory, which emphasizes that strong efficacy strengthen students’ sense of competence to
beliefs foster resilience and persistence in prevent the escalation of academic burnout.
[Link] 1539
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
exhaustion warrants attention, students’ generally foundation for preventing more serious burnout
positive academic orientation provides a strong outcomes.
[Link] 1540
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
The findings indicate that students’ general self- development, and constructive feedback.
efficacy is predominantly moderate to high, with Strengthening self-efficacy across the student
more than half of the respondents reporting population may also help buffer against burnout,
moderate confidence in their ability to manage particularly emotional exhaustion and academic
tasks and challenges, and nearly one-fourth inefficacy.
expressing strong conviction in their capabilities.
These findings are well supported by Bandura’s
This pattern suggests that most students possess
(1997) social cognitive theory, which emphasizes
a functional level of self-belief that supports
the role of self-efficacy in shaping motivation,
effort, persistence, and adaptive coping, even if
persistence, and emotional responses to
confidence is not absolute. However, the
challenges. Empirical studies similarly show that
presence of a small group with low self-efficacy
moderate to high self-efficacy is associated with
highlights a vulnerable segment of students who
effective coping and resilience (Schwarzer &
may experience doubts about their competence,
Jerusalem, 1995), higher motivation and
potentially undermining motivation and
achievement, and lower burnout, particularly
academic engagement.
academic inefficacy (Schaufeli et al., 2002).
These results have important educational Further evidence indicates that strong self-beliefs
implications. Moderate self-efficacy appears reduce vulnerability to burnout even under
sufficient to help most students cope with academic pressure (Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya,
academic demands, though it may not fully shield 2013). In the Philippine context, research likewise
them from stress during highly demanding highlights that students with higher self-efficacy
periods. Students with high self-efficacy are likely exhibit greater academic engagement and
to demonstrate greater resilience and sustained resilience (Datu & Yuen, 2018), reinforcing the
engagement and may serve as positive models conclusion that fostering students’ confidence in
within collaborative learning contexts. their abilities is essential for both academic
Conversely, students with low self-efficacy are at success and well-being.
greater risk of avoidance, poorer performance,
Relationship between the respondents’
and psychological distress, underscoring the need
general self-efficacy and academic burnout
for targeted support through mentoring, skills
Variables M SD r p
Self-Efficacy 2.91 0.57 -0.29 <.001
Academic Burnout 2.34 0.63
The table shows the relationship between When considered alongside the descriptive
students’ general self-efficacy and academic findings, this relationship becomes more
burnout and found a significant negative meaningful. The respondents demonstrated
correlation between the two variables (r = −0.29, moderate self-efficacy, moderate levels of
p < .001). This indicates that as students’ self- emotional exhaustion, and very mild levels of
efficacy increases, their level of academic burnout cynicism and academic inefficacy. This pattern
tends to decrease. Although the strength of the suggests that students who believe in their ability
correlation is small to moderate, the association to handle academic challenges are better
is statistically significant, underscoring the protected from developing negative attitudes
important role of self-beliefs in students’ burnout toward their studies and feelings of
experiences. incompetence, even when they experience some
[Link] 1541
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
degree of emotional fatigue. In this sense, self- determining the level of burnout among the
efficacy appears to function as a psychological respondents.
buffer, preventing emotional exhaustion from
On the aggregate level, the respondents did not
escalating into more severe burnout dimensions.
show the impression to be experiencing burnout.
The findings align with Bandura’s (1997) social However, there were few of them who revealed
cognitive theory, which posits that individuals that they experienced burnout which means very
with stronger self-efficacy are more resilient, strong exhaustion, cynicism and academic
persistent, and adaptive in the face of stressors. inefficacy.
Students who trust their capacity to solve
Furthermore, on the general self-efficacy of the
problems and achieve goals are less likely to
respondents, it was revealed that majority of
interpret academic demands as overwhelming or
them moderately believe about their capabilities
threatening. Consequently, they experience lower
to produce a specified levels of performance that
burnout symptoms. Similarly, Schaufeli et al.
influences over events that affect their lives.
(2002) and Salmela-Aro and Upadyaya (2013)
However, there were few who accepted the
reported that higher self-efficacy is associated
feeling of low self-efficacy.
with lower levels of exhaustion, cynicism, and
academic inefficacy among students. Moreover, the respondents’ general self-efficacy
is significantly related to academic burnout,
The observed correlation is also consistent with
hence the former is a predictor of academic
studies in the Philippine context. Research by
burnout.
Datu and Yuen (2018) and Serafica & Muria
(2023) showed that Filipino students with Recommendations
stronger self-beliefs demonstrate greater In view of the findings surfaced at, the following
academic engagement and emotional resilience, are hereby recommended:
which reduces vulnerability to burnout. The
present findings further support these 1. Reduce academic burnout by helping students
conclusions, suggesting that even moderate levels improve their academic achievement and
of self-efficacy can meaningfully mitigate learning motivation especially in the new
burnout among learners. The results imply that normal where consultation to teachers is very
interventions aimed at strengthening students’ minimal.
self-efficacy such as mastery-oriented instruction, 2. Provide more alternative assessment of
constructive feedback, and supportive teacher– students’ work to widen their repertoire of
student relationships may be effective in reducing academic achievement.
academic burnout. Hence, if teachers foster
3. The school may devise programs that involve
confidence in their capabilities, schools can help
students in extracurricular activities where
students manage academic demands more
they can enrich their academic lives and
adaptively and sustain both well-being and
collaborate with other students. These are
engagement.
significant ways and means for them to have
Conclusion diversions for their immnesne academic
Academic burnout is a three dimensional workload.
syndrome which includes emotional exhaustion, 4. Since there is no face to face interaction
cynicism and academic inefficacy. The Maslach during the pandemic, academic advising
Burnout Inventory Scale (MBI) was used in should be observed to appropriately guide
them on their tasks.
[Link] 1542
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
References/Literature Cited
Alibudbud, R. (2021). On online learning and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from the
Philippines. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 66(102867), 102867. [Link]
Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic
and how they cope with them: The case of the philippines. Education and Information
Technologies, 26(7321–7338). [Link]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
[Link]
Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom
management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 239–253. [Link]
051x(99)00057-8
Datu, J. A. D., & Mateo, J. N. (2020). Character strengths, academic self-efficacy, and well-being outcomes in the
Philippines: A longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105649.
[Link]
Datu, J. A. D., Yuen, M., & Chen, G. (2018). The triarchic model of grit is linked to academic success and well-
being among Filipino high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 428–
438. [Link]
Dreison, K. C., Luther, L., Bonfils, K. A., Sliter, M. T., McGrew, J. H., & Salyers, M. P. (2016). Job burnout in mental
health providers: A meta-analysis of 35 years of intervention research. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 1- 13. Advance online publication. [Link]
Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when
implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 72(2), 227–243. [Link]
Galán, F., Sanmartín, A., Polo, J., & Giner, L. (2011). Burnout risk in medical students in Spain using the Maslach
Burnout Inventory-Student Survey. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(4),
453–459. [Link]
Galbraith, C. S., & Merrill, G. B. (2012). Academic and work-related burnout: A longitudinal study of working
undergraduate university business students. Journal of College Student Development, 53(3), 453–
463. [Link]
Hu, Q., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). The Factorial Validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Student Survey in
China. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 394–408. [Link]
Jacobs, S. R., & Dodd, D. K. (2003). Student Burnout as a Function of Personality, Social Support, and
Workload. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 291–
303. [Link]
Khani, M. H., Mohammadi, M., Anvari, F., & Farsi, M. (2017). Students School Burnout Inventory: Development,
Validation, and Reliability of Scale. International Journal of School Health, In Press(In Press).
[Link]
Kocaekşi, S. (2016). The evaluation of burnout levels of sports sciences faculty students. Educational Research
and Reviews, 11(4), 120–124. [Link]
Lagua, B. D. (2020, October 30). Teaching in the new normal. The Manila Times.
[Link]
normal/788762
Lin, C.-C., Lin, B. Y.-J., & Lin, C.-D. (2016). Influence of clerks’ personality on their burnout in the clinical workplace:
a longitudinal observation. BMC Medical Education, 16(1). [Link]
MacDonald, J. B., Saliba, A. J., Hodgins, G., & Ovington, L. A. (2016). Burnout in journalists: A systematic literature
review. Burnout Research, 3(2), 34–44. [Link]
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. (1997). The maslach burnout inventory manual. ResearchGate.
[Link]
[Link] 1543
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek
(Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 19–32). Taylor & Francis.
[Link]
Maslach C, Jackson S.E, Leiter M.P. Maslach burnout inventory manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologists Press. [Link]
Maslach/publication/277816643_The_Maslach_Burnout_Inventory_Manual/links/5574dbd708aeb6d8c019
46d7/[Link]
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The Measurement of Experienced Burnout. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. [Link]
Mutton, T. (2020). Teacher education and Covid-19: responses and opportunities for new pedagogical
initiatives. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 439–441.
[Link]
Neumann, Y., Finaly-Neumann, E., & Reichel, A. (1990). Determinants and Consequences of Students’ Burnout
in Universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(1), 20–31.
[Link]
Neumann, Y., & Neumann, E. F. (1993). Quality of Learning Experience and Students′ College
Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 7(1).
[Link]
Norez, D. (2017). Academic Burnout In College Students: The Impact of Personality Characteristics and Academic
Term on Burnout. Master’s Theses. [Link]
Palma, P. A., Jason, R., Vittorio, Pascua, L. B., Pel, K. C., Jan, P., Gregory, P., Pucan, J. V., & Punzalan, I. J.
(2023). Association of online screen media exposure and burnout among adolescent senior high school
students enrolled in different online curricula in Metro Manila: An analytic cross-sectional study. Health
Sciences Journal, 12(2), 1–1. [Link]
Ramos, B., Baptista, G., Fulong, L., & Sabaulan, J. (2021). Burnout Risks of Filipino College Students during the
Covid- 19 Pandemic: A Basis for Institutional Mental Health Program. Technium Social Sciences
Journal, 26(2668-7798), 112–122. [Link]
Robeniol, G.A.D. (2023), The Association Of Online Learning And Burnout Syndrome Among Filipino Adolescents
In Private Senior High Schools In Metro Manila Using The Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey
(MBI -SS) Asia Pacific Journal of Pediatric and Child Health. (2023).
[Link]
ME+AMONG+FILIPINO+ADOLESCENTS+IN+PRIVATE+SENIOR+HIGH+SCHOOLS+IN+METRO+MANI
LA+USING+THE+MASLACH+BURNOUT+INVENTORY+%28MBI+-SS%29&number=244&page=article
Salmela-Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2013). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands-resources
model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137–151. [Link]
Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burnout assessment tool (BAT) — development, validity, and
reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495.
[Link]
Schaufeli, W. B., Maslach, C., & Maslach, C. (2017). Professional burnout. Routledge.
[Link] (Original work published 1993)
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in
university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481.
[Link]
Serafica, J., & Noralyn Muria. (2023). The Relationship Between Academic Burnout and Resilience to Academic
Achievement Among College Students: A Mixed Methods Study. Psychology and Education: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(6), 1–1. [Link]
Sherer, M., & Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 899–
902. [Link]
Efficacy_Scale
[Link] 1544
2026, 41(13s), 1531-1545 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SPECIAL EDUCATION
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-
efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–
671. [Link]
Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived Teacher Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Job Stress and Burnout:
Mediation Analyses. Applied Psychology, 57(s1), 152–171. [Link]
0597.2008.00359.x
Velasco, J. (2019). Millennials in the university: An inquiry on burnout among Filipino university students. Pertanika
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(3), 1801–1814.
[Link]
Velasco, J. C., & De Chavez, J. (2018). Millennial Work Ethic: A Preliminary Examination of the Work Ethic Profile
of Filipino University Students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(6), 121–130.
[Link]
[Link] 1545