Chapter One - Copy
Chapter One - Copy
INTRODUCTION
Domestic violence is widely recognized as one of the most persistent violations of human rights
across the world. It involves a pattern of behavior in any relationship that is used to gain or
maintain power and control over an intimate partner. In Nigeria, domestic violence manifests in
several forms including physical assault, emotional abuse, sexual coercion, and economic
deprivation. Spouse battering, which refers specifically to physical violence between marital
partners, remains one of the most reported forms (Pillay, 2020). In many societies, particularly in
developing regions, cultural beliefs and patriarchal norms often normalize or justify violence
against spouses, especially women. In Chikun Local Government Area of Kaduna State,
anecdotal evidence suggests that domestic violence cases are prevalent but underreported due to
Human rights principles emphasize dignity, equality, and the right to live free from violence.
Domestic violence directly contradicts these principles. Therefore, examining the intersection
between domestic violence and human rights provides a deeper understanding of how societal
structures perpetuate abuse and how legal frameworks can be strengthened (Adebayo, 2023).
Statistics pertaining to the prevalence of intimate partner violence have revealed an incessant
increase in the rate of its perpetration and victimization all over the world. For instance, some
studies from around the world show that 10% to over 50% of women reported being hit or have
experienced other forms of physical violence from a male intimate partner at some point in their
1
lives (World Health Organization, 2020). It is also estimated that as high as 38% of all femicide
In Africa, research reports that about 60% of all women in Tanzania, 50% in Zambia, 42% in
Kenya, 46% in Uganda, and 81% in Nigeria have experienced one form of violence or the other
in conjugal relationships (Kishor & Johnson, 2023). Drawing from the statistics on African
reports, it is evident that Nigeria is one of the countries with high prevalence of domestic
violence in sub-Sahara Africa, where two-thirds of women experience male partner violence
(Amnesty International, 2022). Globally, it can be stated that every case of domestic violence is a
potential life threatening act that can lead to mortality. This is particularly true because numerous
For instance, according to the Department of Health (2022), on average, two women a week are
killed by a male partner or former partner and this constitutes around one-third of all female
homicide victims. Additionally, intimate partner violence in the United States resulted into 2,340
deaths in 2007, accounting for 14% of all homicides. Of these deaths, 70% were females and
30% were males. In Nigeria, there have been reports of cases of husbands murdering and
maiming their wives in the media. For instance, the statistics presented by This Day (2020)
newspaper are overwhelming. About 50% of women have been battered by their husbands.
Shockingly, more educated women (65%) are in this terrible situation as compared with their
low income counterparts (55%). Sadly enough, a staggering 97.2% of them are not prepared to
report to the Nigeria Police. As a result, most of these women endure, believing they have
nowhere to go and that the law of the country will not protect them from being victimized.
Weldon (2022) as cited in McKie (2024) stated that intimate partner violence is gaining
increasing recognition worldwide and it is an issue of concern. This problem has prompted most
2
governments to be keen to promote it as a human rights issue in their countries. Intimate partner
violence has many consequences for both men and women. For women, it affects their
However, is that intimate partner violence is associated with physical, mental, and reproductive
health challenges that affect the lives of many women (Emenike, Lawoko & Dalal, 2021). Many
of the physical injuries sustained by women seem to cause medical difficulties as women grow
older. Hypertension, arthritis and different forms of heart diseases have been identified by
battered women as directly caused or aggravated 2 by domestic violence suffered early in their
adult lives. In addition, its perpetration threatens women’s societal freedom, dignity, and
infringes on their fundamental human rights (Sokoloff & Dupont, 2021). In addition, it is
estimated that one third of women worldwide are at risk of experiencing physical and/or sexual
coercion and rape from a male domestic partner (World Health Organization, 2020). In different
cultures and settings, most issues of domestic violence among intimate partners have centered on
men as the major perpetrators in heterosexual relationships. This is not to deny cases of male
victimization in domestic violence. Men can be, and frequently are, also victims of abuse in the
home at the hands of their female partners. For instance, a study found that women are slightly
more likely to be victimized in non-reciprocal violence, whereas men are slightly more likely to
be victimized in reciprocal violence (Centre for Disease Control, 2020). The study also found
that almost three quarters of non-reciprocal violence is perpetrated by women. A similar study
found that women are more likely to be injured in non-reciprocal violence and men are more
likely to be injured in reciprocal violence (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2021). Unfortunately, the great
reluctance of many men and boys to report domestic violence makes it very difficult to assess its
scope worldwide.
3
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Despite existing laws and advocacy efforts, domestic violence continues to persist in many
Nigerian communities. In Chikun LGA, victims often suffer in silence due to societal pressure,
economic dependence, and fear of stigma. This situation raises serious concerns about the
The continued occurrence of spouse battering highlights gaps in enforcement of laws and public
awareness. Victims are exposed to physical harm, psychological trauma, and in extreme cases,
death. This study seeks to investigate the causes, forms, and consequences of domestic violence,
as well as its implications on human rights. Virtually every week, at least a case of domestic
violence among intimate partners in Chikun LGA is reported in both the print and electronic
media. “Husband beats wife to stupor, wife stabs husband to death, father rapes daughter”, and
many more are becoming daily feature of various Nigerian tabloids. From a gender perspective,
domestic violence among intimate partners has also been identified as a primary cause of
mortality and injury to women across the globe. (Oladepo, et al, 2021) There have several reports
in the mass media suggesting that this problem is on the increase in Lagos State despite several
awareness campaigns and government's efforts to reduce this problem to the barest minimum.
For instant, The Guardian Nigeria (2026) reported that 6,753 cases of gender-based violence
were documented within one year in Lagos State. Similarly, Radio Nigeria Lagos (2025)
reported that the state recorded 8,692 cases of domestic and sexual violence between August
2024 and July 2025, with domestic violence accounting for 3,685 cases. These reports indicate
that domestic violence remains a serious social problem in Lagos State. The alarming rate
morbidity and mortality related to domestic violence necessitates this research in order to
examine the state of intimate partner violence, forms of intimate partner violence, its
4
contribution to casualty among intimate partners and the level of awareness of the mechanisms
i. What are the major causes of domestic violence and human right activities in Chikun
ii. What are the types of community support available to victims of domestic violence of
iii. What are the state of domestic violence and casualty among intimate partners in Chikun
iv. What are the state different types of domestic violence among intimate partners in
The main objective is to examine domestic violence as a human rights issue. The specifically
i. To examine the major causes of domestic violence and human right activities in Chikun
ii. To examine the types of community support available to victims of domestic violence of
5
iii. To examine the state of domestic violence and casualty among intimate partners in in
iv. To find out different types of domestic violence among intimate partners in Chikun LGA of
Kaduna State.
psychological factors and the occurrence of domestic violence in Chikun LGA, Kaduna State.
H02 Community support services do not significantly influence the well-being and recovery of
victims of domestic violence and spouse battering in Chikun LGA, Kaduna State.
H03 There is no significant relationship between identified casual factors and the prevalence of
Ho4 The various form of domestic violence has no significant relationship in occurrence among
This study is significant because it contributes to the understanding of domestic violence within
the human rights framework. It will assist policymakers, NGOs, and law enforcement agencies in
This study will also create the consciousness among men and women of why incidents of
6
Also, through the findings of this study, young women and men will be confident to report cases
of intimate partner violence knowing that it is not peculiar to them and that the 5 perceived
It will also help to provide insights for the government and other relevant agencies on the need to
create strategies and enunciate laws to protect the interest of victims of intimate partner violence
Violence: Violence as used in this study refers to the intentional use of physical force or power,
threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which
either results in or has high the likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm and
Domestic Violence Domestic violence means unlawful physical and emotional violence used or
threatened by one spouse or co-habitant against the other. It represents a pattern of abusive
behaviour in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or maintain power and control
over another intimate partner. It can be physical, sexual, emotional, economic, or psychological
actions or threats of actions that influence another person. These include behaviours that
intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, blame and hurt
someone.
Casualty: Casualty as used in this study refers to deaths or injuries suffered as a result of
domestic violence.
7
Mortality: Mortality refers to the state of being subjected to death, especially on a large scale. It
also refers to the quality of being susceptible to death or the reality of death.
Intimate Partner: An intimate partner refers to a person with whom one has a close personal
knowledge about each other’s lives, ongoing physical contact and/or sexual relations and identity
as a couple among others. An intimate partner could be current or former spouse, boyfriend or
Spouse Battering: Is a form of domestic violence involving repeated, intentional physical abuse
by one partner against another, often aim at controlling the victim through fear.
8
CHAPTER TWO
This chapter reviews existing literature on domestic violence and presents the theoretical
framework.
Domestic violence among intimate partners, also referred to as intimate partner violence (IPV),
occurs when a person including current or former spouse (married spouse, common-law spouse,
civil union spouse, cohabiting partner); boyfriend/girlfriend; dating partner; sexual partner tries
to control the other person either through the use of fear, threat and or intimidation (Benedicts,
Jaffe & Segal, 2022). Similarly, the World Health Organization (2022) defines domestic violence
among intimate partners as any behaviour within an intimate relationship that causes physical,
psychological or sexual harm to those in the relationship. The Maryland Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene (2023) also defines domestic violence among intimate partners as the actual
the control or domination of one person over another. However, the precise definition of IPV
varies among different organizations and researchers comparing prevalence, epidemiology, and
associated effects. Some definitions are narrow and limited to spouses, only physical violence,
only female, or only to heterosexual couples. Narrow definitions can be useful within a
9
Domestic violence among intimate partners occurs across all cultures, religions and socio
economic backgrounds (Garcia-Moreno, Heise, Jansen, Ellsberg & Watts, 2024), and it has
adverse effects on public health. Intimate partner violence encompasses physical, sexual, or
psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse. Domestic violence among intimate
partners varies in frequency of occurrence and severity, and it occurs on a continuum, ranging
from one episode that might or might not have lasting impact to chronic and severe episodes over
Beating basically denotes a term which involves the unlawful beating of another person or any
threatening touch to another person’s clothes or body, which in many homes begins with a
relatively minor misunderstanding between the parties (Chukwu, et al, 2024). The term connotes
the use of excessive physical force that ultimately results to injury to that person which the great
force is being applied upon. When it is directed at the female in a marital relationship it is called
According to Suaad (2025), a diverse range of terms has been used to describe wife beating, it
can be regarded as an issue for women in a marital or other intimate relationship, sometimes wife
abuse, wife battery, partner abuse, physical abuse and domestic violence. Thus, wife beating
involves overt physical force or violence perpetrated by a husband on his wife. It is one of the
many dimensions of gender issues that takes the form of hitting, slapping, kicking, pushing,
dragging, cutting, shooting and throwing of objects (Alokan, 2023). In addition, Laeheem and
Boonprakarn (2024) stated that, it is a male behaviour pattern of hurting females or wives
physically and mentally in order to show power in controlling them. Victims are wives who are
10
hurt by their husbands physically in order to threaten them to do something without
consideration of their wives right. To do this, husband use different forms and levels of intensity
which can be physical attack, causing physical wound ranging from minor to more serious one or
Koenig et al (2023), identified common reasons leading to beating of wives in some cases to
include lack of submission to spouse, refusal to have sex, argue with spouse, going out without
telling spouse and suspected infidelity. Dobash and Dobash cited in Muomah (2020), maintain
that, the history of wife beating is a product of a system, which reflects historical laws about
male ownership in marriage, as well as current social gender roles and structures, which secure
the dominance of men over women. The author further indicated that wife beating like most
things that came into existence at a particular time in history, is traced to the way women for
decade after decade had been conditioned by the religious, socio-cultural and legal concepts that
held them to be naturally inferior to men. For instance In Africa, particularly in Nigeria Ameh
and Abdul (2025), argues that the section 55 (1) of the Penal Code of Northern Nigeria
unwittingly encourages wife beating. It states, “Nothing is an offence which does not amount to
infliction of grievous hurt upon any person and which is done by husband for the purpose of
correcting his wife, such husband or wife being subject to native law or custom in which such
correction is recognized as lawful.” This law has been exploited by many husbands to inflict
terrible violence on their wives. Writing in the same vein Otufale (2023), submits that wife
beating is as a result of the socio-cultural belief system prevalent in relationships between man
and woman, where the men are socialized into believing that they are entitled to be superior to
the women and should be at the apex of decision making in marriage while the women are to be
subordinated to the point of their detriment and to achieve this, husbands are willing to control
11
and coerce their wives by a variety of means to maintain their rights, authorities and positions in
the marriage.
Economic factors also matter because they can shape the way public looks at or accepts wife
beating as justified. For instance, Chuma and Chazovachill (2022) argued that, women’s
dependence on men and the cultural value of being a proper wife may lead most women to
decide that, the trouble of contradicting gender role is worse than staying with a violent partner.
The author also argued that, women who depend solely on their husbands for survival are more
likely to tolerate beating perpetrated by spouses because poverty can put a severe constrain on
women to challenge violence perpetrated against them. The implication of this could be that,
poverty limits the ability of most people to see wife beating as abnormal behavior even though
According to Fakunmoju, et al, (2022), due to economic factor many women have continue to
bear the major brunt of partner violence in many patriarchal societies, and continue to condone
as well as conceal it as private affair because of the mere fact that women are economically
dependent on men which made it physically incapable of confronting their abusers even in the
face of threatening danger and looming risk of being battered to death by her husband. Similarly,
Oyediran (2021), contended that, categories of people vulnerable to accept and justify wife
beating under the above circumstance are women who depend on men and women who do not
have autonomy in household decision pertaining to their own health, social activities or visits to
parents or relatives, as well as people with rigid believes regarding submissiveness of women,
male prestige.
12
2.3 Role of Health Care Sector and Community Support in Preventing and Responding
Domestic Violence
While preventing and responding to violence against women requires a multi-sectorial approach,
the health sector has an important role to play. However, although violence against women has
been accepted as a critical public health and clinical care issue, it is still not included in the
health-care policies of many countries (Ansara & Hindin, 2020). The critical role that the health
system and health-care providers can play in terms of identification, assessment, treatment, crisis
intervention, documentation, referral, and follow-up, is poorly understood or accepted within the
national health programmes and policies of various countries. Health-care professionals tend to
regard violence against women as a criminal justice issue, and view partner violence in particular
as a domestic matter. They are also ill-equipped to deal with the issues, since medical and
nursing education in many countries does not address this problem. In order for health-care
providers to assume their roles in mitigating the effects of violence and fulfill their
responsibility, it is necessary to sensitize them towards the issue and provide them with the
information and tools necessary to respond sensitively and effectively to survivors. These
guidelines are a first step in this direction. The health-care providers frequently, and often
unknowingly, come into contact with women affected by violence, since abused women make
extensive use of healthcare resources (Ansara & Hindin, 2020; Black, 2021). Health-care
providers are in a unique position to create a safe and confidential environment for facilitating
disclosure of violence, while offering appropriate support and referral to other resources and
i. Advocate to make violence against women unacceptable and for such violence to be
13
ii. Provide comprehensive services, sensitize and train health care providers in responding to the
iii. Prevent recurrence of violence through early identification of women and children who are
iv. Promote egalitarian gender norms as part of life skills and comprehensive sexuality education
v. Generate evidence on what works and on the magnitude of the problem by carrying out
demographic and health surveys, as well as in surveillance and health information systems.
2.3.1 The Role of Social Workers in Preventing and Responding to Domestic Violence
Domestic violence is one of the most common issues social workers come across. Social workers
have worked with victims of domestic violence for years - in the courts, social services, accident
and emergency, and in refuges (SafeLives, 2021). However, their role in helping victims and
families includes:
i. Social workers are skilled at engaging with the whole family and are able to link the
experiences of every member of that family the victim, the perpetrator and the children.
ii. Making sure the children and the victim are safe are key tasks for the social worker;
iii. The social worker works with the parent to encourage them to see the world how their
children do. This approach helps to motivate the parents to change the situation the family is
in;
14
iv. Social workers also work directly with the children to strengthen the mother-child
relationship, as it can be badly affected by domestic abuse especially if the victim separates
v. Social workers need to understand the impact of domestic violence on the mother’s mental
vi. Also focus on the whole family, social workers engage in a safe way with the perpetrator,
challenging them to change their behavior. But domestic abuse is not a simple issue and
responding effectively requires a truly holistic approach. That is why coordinated support
from a whole range of agencies is crucial. Social workers can build strong links with other
It is vital that social workers understand what an effective preventive and response to domestic
abuse is. To offer the skills and knowledge needed to effectively help families, social workers
ensure to keep up-to-date with domestic violence and abuse case law, learn from relevant serious
case reviews and attend training. Social Work experts produce domestic violence preventive and
response guidance, which will help to prevent domestic violence and achieve family stability
(SafeLives, 2021).
15
2.3.2 Consequences of Domestic Violence
rights. As early as 1984, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the UN General
Assembly identified violence against women as an abuse that threatens the security of women
and their fundamental rights to life and liberty, as well as freedom from fear and want. Also in
December 1993, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights published the
Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women or Violence against Men. Section
34(1)(a) of the Constitution also provides that every individual is entitled to respect for the
dignity of his person, and accordingly, no person shall be subject to torture or to inhuman or
degrading treatment.
personal development and reduction in the contribution women can make to the lives of others.
Violence against women does not avail women the power to protect themselves from unwanted
pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Domestic violence against women has incalculable
costs to present and future generations and limits a woman’s personal growth, her productivity
and her socio-economic roles. Also, women’s aspirations and achievements are inhibited, not
just by the injuries of physical attacks but by the implicit threat to social development. By
subjecting women to violence and without a social structure that endeavours to stop this practice,
the women could be made to believe that they are actually inferior to their counterparts and that
they deserve the abuse. This can affect their self-image and perception of men in general. States
that fail to prevent and prosecute perpetrators of domestic violence treat women as second-class
citizens and send a clear message that the violence against them is of no concern to the state.
16
Health Consequences: Domestic violence is a profound health problem that compromises
women’s physical and mental health, and erodes their self-esteem. In addition to causing injury,
violence increases women’s long-term risk of a number of other health problems including
chronic pain, physical disability, drug and alcohol abuse, and depression. Women with a history
of physical or sexual abuse are also at increased risk for unintended pregnancy, sexually
transmitted infections, and miscarriages. For many women, the psychological consequences of
abuse are even more serious than its physical effects. The experience of abuse often erodes
women’s self-esteem and puts them at greater risk of a variety of mental health problems
including depression, anxiety, phobias, post- traumatic stress disorder, and can also result in
alcohol and drug abuse. Violence and sexual abuse also lie behind some reproductive health
issues like unwanted pregnancies, HIV and other STIs, and complications of pregnancy.
Impact on Children: The most important actors in any child’s life are often, and should most
often be, his or her parents. As such, the family can be the single most important factor in
determining whether or not a child is protected. On the other hand, given the centrality of the
family in the child’s life, it can also be a frequent source of violence, abuse, discrimination and
exploitation. Children who have witnessed their mothers being subjected to one form of violence
or another, tend to follow suit because they feel that is the best way to deal with their wives too.
They could on the other hand, avoid women due to the fear of repeating what their fathers did
Also, children fail to receive adequate care and attention from battered women who are too busy
nursing their wounds or trying to find a way out of their predicament. This is especially when
injuries inflicted on them by their husbands leads to their death. In a study conducted on 308
women in Igbo land, the results revealed that pregnant women were no less vulnerable to battery
17
than other women, as more than half of the respondents (58.9%) were beaten during pregnancy.
This occurred more in the rural than urban areas (65.8% vs. 52.9%) (Campbell, et al, 2022).
Domestic violence in pregnancy is of particular concern because of the implications for safe
motherhood and child health. In a study conducted in a referral centre in southern Nigeria, in
which 502 women participated, 220 (43.8%) women reported experiencing violence before,
during, and after pregnancy. A total of 142 (28.3%) women reported experiencing violence only
during pregnancy, whereas 4 (0.8%) experienced violence only after childbirth (Walker, 2021).
Domestic violence also affects children. For instance, studies have shown that such abuse results
to lower reading levels for adolescents (Thompson & Whimper, 2020); lower scores on
standardized tests for children ages 6 to 17 in particular, for girls and children younger than 12
years old (Peek-Asa et al., 2023); poor school attendance and lower academic achievement on
average (Jayasinghe, Jayawardena & Perera, 2020); dropping out of school or failing a school
year (Duvand, Schvaiber, Franca & Barros, 2021); lower performance in regular academic tasks
such as reading, quality of work, and math (Bourdillion, Levison, Myers & White, 2021).
Alibi and Oni (2017) also find that exposure of children to domestic violence may affect their
performance in school such that they lag behind in class as well as in life. This is because being
the first point of contact and foundation for the child, whatever happens at home significantly
affects the behavioural and psychological upbringing of the child (Meltzer, 2019) just as it has
and emotional adjustment for children (Fantuzzo, et al, 2020). Domestic violence has negative
consequences for children (Assad, et al, 2021); projects poor child nutrition (Heaton and Forste,
18
2023); has negative effects on children’s intellectual (Huth-Bocks, et al, 2019); emotional, social
and behavioural development (Evans, et al, 2018); and negative psychological, social, and
academic attainment (Kitzmana, etal, 2023). According to Akpan and Usoroh (2025), the
occurrence of domestic violence has profound and destructive consequences that ranges from
physical, emotional and financial effects on the inhabitants of the home are it the women,
children or men. In their study, Moffitt and Caspi (2023) observed that children whose parents
fought one another are at the risk of abuse three to nine times higher than other children. By
implication, living in an emotionally charged and violent homes has negative outcomes for
children’s responsive and mental health in both the immediate and longer term (Stanley, 2021;
Wolfe, et al, 2023) as some children may ‘externalize’ their feelings and confusion through
aggressive or antisocial behaviour, while others may ‘internalize’ the behaviours reflecting
The National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN, 2014) claim that children who are
exposed to domestic violence are more likely than other children to show signs of behavioral and
emotional depression (such as anxiety, higher levels of anger and disobedience, fear and
withdrawal, poor peer sibling, low self-esteem); cognitive and attitudinal problems (that is,
difficulties with concentration and task completion in school, lack of conflict resolution skills,
lower marks on assessment of verbal, motor, and cognitive skills, possess limited problem
solving skills, and demonstrate pro-violence attitudes); long-term problems (for example, alcohol
abuse, drug abuse, smoking, and several other risk factors that are common causes of death).
Children that witness domestic violence are between 2.9 and 4.4 times more likely to experience
neglect, physical and sexual from a caregiver than those children that are not exposed to such
occurrence (Radford et al., 2024); may suffer abandonment, transfer aggression from either of
19
the parent, and may have difficulties in building and maintaining relationships and impulsiveness
Physical Violence: Any act which causes physical harm as a result of unlawful physical force.
Physical violence can take the form of, among others, serious and minor assault, deprivation of
liberty, manslaughter, pushing, biting, hitting, burning, strangling, and using a weapon, homicide
(Taket et al., 2023). WHO (1996) observed that 20 to 50 percent of women from country to
Sexual Violence: Sexual violence is any sexual act or attempt to obtain a sexual act by violence
or coercion, acts to traffic a person or acts directed against a person's sexuality, regardless of the
Emotional Abuse: Emotional or psychological yelling, name calling, blaming, shaming and
isolation are behavior that threaten, intimidate and undermines victims’ self-worth or self-esteem
or controls the victims’ freedom. Emotional abuse can even involve humiliating the victim
privately or publicly, controlling what he can and cannot do, withholding information or even
deliberately doing things that will make the victim of abuse feed diminished or embarrassed.
The target of emotional abuse is to reduce your feeling of self-worth and independence. Victims
most often report that emotional torture and living under terror is most unbearable than physical
violence or brutality. Close correction except between high incidence of suicide and attempted
suicide to emotional stress. This has been reported in countries like Peru, Nigeria, India,
20
Bangladesh, New Guinea and United State. The victims of emotional abuse eventually succumb
to the feeling that they cannot survive and leave independently without their abuser.
Psychological Violence: Any intentional conduct that seriously impairs another person's
psychological integrity through coercion or threats. Statistical definition: Any act which causes
psychological harm to an individual. Psychological violence can take the form of, for example,
coercion, defamation, verbal insult or harassment, bullying, jealous behavior, humiliation, verbal
forbidding work or forcing the victim to work. Economic abuse as a form of abuse when an
intimate partner has control over the other partners’ access to economic resources. The ultimate
goal of economic abuse is to control the partner. Financial abuses include but not limited to the
following strategies:
v. Choosing of career;
vii. Stealing and taking partners money and making partner account for every penny in their
possession.
21
Legal and Administrative Abuse: Abuse of power or abuse of authority, in the form of
malfeasance in the house and is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity,
which affects the performance of family life, such as use of institutions to inflict further abuse on
a victim, for example taking out false restraining orders to deny the victim access to his children
Spiritual Abuse: Spiritual abuse involves preventing a partner from engaging in his or her
religious practices. It could even involve the use of religious beliefs to manipulate dominate or
control a partner. Religious beliefs, teaching and practices can serve as basis for the tolerance of
abusive behavior in the family. Religious teaching can therefore serve as road blocks and as
resource for victims of violence. Some abusers even justify their action by making reference to
the bible verse that accepts male superiority and female submission. This argument is however
countered that the use of violence by men is purely a misinterpretation of the role of men in the
acceptance of abuse.
Social Abuse: Social abuse is a hidden form of violating and can take the form of isolating a
partner from his support networks. The perpetrator is attempting to control and assert his hold on
the victim by isolating the victim from his associates and members of the community. Rigid
social roles are used to limit the expression of feeling of anger and depression. The victim is
given the orientation that he is not as capable as their abuser. The police, legal system, medical
system, social service by the action or inaction can support or promote social abuse by
undervaluing request for help and blaming the victim of domestic violence for his or her ordeal.
22
2.5 Causes of Domestic Violence on Spouse Battering
Domestic violence also known as domestic abuse, intimate partner violence or abuse may start
when one partner feels the need to control and dominate the other (Susmitha, 2021; Goldsmith,
2020). Domestic violence and abuse stem from a desire to gain and maintain power and control
over an intimate partner. Abusive people believe they have the right to control and restrict their
partners, and they may enjoy the feeling that exerting power gives them:
i. Abusers may feel this need to control their partner because of low self-esteem, extreme
jealousy, difficulties in regulating anger and other strong emotions, or when they feel
inferior to the other partner in education and socioeconomic background (Semahegn &
ii. Some people with very traditional beliefs may think they have the right to control their
partner, and that women are not equal to men. Others may have an undiagnosed personality
disorder or psychological disorder. Still others may have learned this behavior from growing
up in a household where domestic violence was accepted as a normal part of being raised in
their family.
iii. A partner’s domination may take the form of emotional, physical or sexual abuse. Studies
suggest that violent behavior often is caused by an interaction of situational and individual
factors. That means that abusers learn violent behavior from their family, people in their
community and other cultural influences as they grow up. They may have seen violence
often or they may have been victims themselves. Some abusers acknowledge growing up
iv. Children who witness or are the victims of violence may learn to believe that violence is a
reasonable way to resolve conflict between people. Boys who learn that women are not to be
23
valued or respected and who see violence directed against women are more likely to abuse
women when they grow up. Girls who witness domestic violence in their families of origin
are more likely to be victimized by their own husbands. Although women are most often the
victim of domestic violence, the gender roles can and are reversed sometimes.
v. Alcohol and drugs may contribute to violent behavior. A drunk or high person will be less
likely to control his or her violent impulses toward their partner, so keeping such drinking or
drug use episodes to a minimum may be valuable for a person living in a domestic violence
2.6 Legal Framework for the Protection of Women against Violence in Nigeria
There have been increased efforts to enhance the protection and promotion of women’s rights
through the international, regional, and national enactment of laws and policies. Such efforts
have resulted in documents like the Convention on the Elimination of All forms of
Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Beijing Platform for Action at the
international level (Biodun, 2020). Some countries have passed laws and policies incorporating
such international standards into their domestic laws. For example, Nigeria has incorporated the
United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially
Women and Children, and the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime (UNCTOC) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) into domestic law
(Ijeoma, 2013).
However, there is no National Law in Nigeria that deals with the protection of women against
domestic violence. The Minister of Women Affairs and Social Development, Hajiya Zainab
Maina, at a stakeholders preparatory meeting on the 57th Session of the United Nations
24
Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in September 2013 disclosed that the committee
that was set up to harmonise all bills dealing with violence against women into a single bill titled
‘Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Bill’ (VAPP) was still lobbying for its speedy passage.
In March 2013, the House of Representatives of the National Assembly passed the bill but it is
yet to get the senate’s approval. The law which aims to eliminate or reduce to a minimum the
cases of gender based violence includes a comprehensive definition and harsh sentences for rape
and other sexual offences, compensation for rape victims, institutional protection from further
abuse through restraining orders and a new fund to support the rehabilitation of victims of
violence. Covering a wide spectrum of violence, including Female Genital Mutilation, early and
forced marriage, rape and harmful widowhood practices, the bill aims to recognise the rights of
all to safety both in the workplace and in the home (Jacky, 2013).
There are however, few states in Nigeria which have passed laws to protect women in their
respective states. Such states include Lagos State, Ekiti State, Kaduna, Ebonyi, Cross river and
Jigawa Sates. In Lagos, the Law that was set up to protect women is referred to as the Protection
against Domestic Violence Law 2007. The Law prohibits any person from committing any act of
domestic violence against any person in Lagos State. It prescribes and regulates the behaviour of
every citizen of Lagos state in their domestic environment (BAOBAB, 2023). The Law is made
not only to protect women who are most times, the target of domestic violence, but also to
safeguard the interests of men, children, servants, maids and everyone who may be a victim of
domestic violence. This is regardless of sex, age or marital status. The Law provides for financial
assistance by the state through the office of the public defender or legal aid council to victims of
domestic violence who may be financially handicapped to seek redress in court under this Law
(Francis, 2022). Therefore, lack of money cannot hinder a person from seeking redress under this
25
Law. Section 18(g) lists the acts constituting domestic violence as including but not limited to
the following: physical abuse, sexual abuse, starvation, emotional, verbal and psychological
abuse, economic abuse, denial of basic education, intimidation, harassment, stalking, hazardous
The case of domestic violence can be commenced in a magistrate court or high court of the state
through a motion on notice (Aihie, 2021). One good thing about this Law is that it is gender
A complainant under the law can apply for a protection order where an act of Domestic violence
or a criminal offence that contains an element of domestic violence is committed against him or
her. Parties present at such proceedings are the officers of the court, parties, legal representatives,
witnesses, or person bringing the application and the court has discretion to hear the proceedings
in private or exclude any person from the proceeding in court. The information on the identity of
the parties or relating to the proceeding in court must be confidential and not published;
otherwise it attracts a penalty of N 20,000 fine or a year imprisonment (Saharay, 2018). The
Director, Gender and Legal Aid, Women Advocate Research and Documentation Centre
(WARDC), Ms. Grace Otor in an interview acknowledged that domestic violence is a criminal
matter that should not be accepted by victims as a cultural phenomenon or as a way of life.
Rather, it should be viewed as a human right issue which touches on the right to liberty, freedom
of expression, freedom of movement among other rights. Otor however noted that the Lagos
State government has failed to make domestic violence a criminal offence but a civil offence.
She stated that the act would only become a criminal matter when an abuser or a culprit disobeys
court orders as listed in the law unlike the Ekiti state law which criminalizes it. Besides, she said
the Federal and the state governments had also not shown the political will to curb the incidence
26
of domestic violence adding that of the 36 states of Nigeria, only five states have a legal
framework regulating domestic violence. Ekiti Enacts Law against Gender-Based Violence
(EKSGON, 2011).
In Ekiti State, Nigeria, the bill prohibiting gender-based violence was signed into law by the
Governor, Dr Kayode Fayemi, in Ado-Ekiti on November 25, 2011. With the development, Ekiti
became the first state in the federation to pass such law that seeks to protect both genders against
physical and psychological abuse and violence. The Gender based Violence Law seeks to create
an Act to eliminate violence in private and public life, prohibit all forms of violence including
against persons and to provide maximum protection and effective remedies for victims and
punishment of offenders. The law seeks to protect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of
women, children and a minority of men against physical, economic, mental or sexual harm or
suffering, as well as threats of such acts, coercion and other deprivations of liberty within the
To critically examine Domestic violence and human rights within Chikun LGA of Kaduna State,
this study draws upon two complementary theoretical frameworks: the Social Ecological Model
and Feminist Theory. These frameworks provide a multidimensional lens through which the
The Social Ecological Model (SEM) offers a layered approach to understanding violence,
recognizing that individual behavior is shaped by interactions across multiple levels of influence
27
namely, individual, relationship, community, and societal contexts. At the individual level,
factors such as personal history, substance use, and exposure to violence during childhood can
increase vulnerability to both victimization and perpetration. The relationship level considers the
influence of close interpersonal connections, including family dynamics and peer interactions,
which may reinforce harmful norms or provide protective support. The community level
examines the role of institutions such as schools, religious centers, and workplaces, and how
their norms and resources either mitigate or exacerbate violence. Finally, the societal level
addresses broader structural factors, including cultural beliefs, economic inequality, and legal
policies that shape the environment in which domestic violence occurs (Centers for Disease
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory provides a critical lens for analyzing domestic violence as a manifestation of
gendered power relations embedded within patriarchal structures. It posits that gender-based
violence is not random or isolated but is deeply rooted in societal norms that privilege male
dominance and female subordination. Feminist scholars argue that domestic violence is
protections, and cultural narratives that normalize male control over women (Buiten, 2022; Hall,
2022).
This theory also emphasizes the importance of empowerment and systemic change, advocating
for policies and practices that challenge gender hierarchies and promote equity. Feminist
and community mobilization to dismantle the structural conditions that enable abuse. In the
28
context of Chikun LGA of Kaduna State, Feminist Theory helps illuminate how cultural and
institutional norms may reinforce silence, stigma, and impunity, and underscores the need for
transformative action.
Together, the Social Ecological Model and Feminist Theory offer a robust foundation for
understanding the multifaceted nature of domestic violence and guiding effective, context-
sensitive responses.
29
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the various steps that were adopted in studying the research problem. It
deals with the various techniques, methods and tools employed in the collection and analysis of
data. Topics presented include the research design, study location, study population, sampling
technique and sample size, research instruments and methods of data analysis.
3.2 Design
The research design for the research study was anchored on the non-experimental and descriptive
research designs. Descriptive research according to Best and Kahn (2020) is the type of
investigation that deals with the collection and analysis of data for the purpose of describing and
interpreting existing conditions and also to make discovery and explanation of past event.
Descriptive research is being utilized because it enables exploring relationship between variables
as well as being appropriate for testing the hypothesis of the study. Descriptive research helps
answer the what, when, where and how questions of a research problem rather than just why in
Chikun Local Government Area (LGA) is situated in southern Kaduna State, Nigeria, between
latitudes 10°00′N and 10°50′N and longitudes 6°04′E and 7°05′E. It covers approximately 4,801
km², with Kujama as its administrative headquarters. The LGA borders Kaduna South LGA to
the north, Niger State to the southwest, and Kajuru and Kachia LGAs to the east. Chikun LGA
30
has a tropical continental climate, classified as Köppen Aw. This is characterized by a
pronounced harmattan season (November–February) that is cold, dry, and dusty, and a rainy
season from April to October, peaking in August. Mean maximum temperatures range from
al., 2020).
Soils are predominantly ferruginous, tropical, fragile, and leached, with 30–40% clay content and
poor nutrient retention, requiring fertilizers for sustained agriculture. Some low-lying areas
feature permanently waterlogged 'fadama' soils prone to seasonal flooding and cracking.
Vegetation falls within the northern Guinea savannah zone, characterized by scattered trees such
as Isoberlinia doka and Isoberlinia tomentosa, interspersed with grasslands, though heavily
modified by farming, grazing, firewood collection, and deforestation (Baba et al., 2020).
Economic activities are diverse: rural areas focus on subsistence and commercial farming of
crops such as yams, cassava, maize, beans, millet, rice, and groundnuts, as well as livestock
rearing (cattle, sheep, goats, and poultry). Urban and peri-urban zones feature trade, public
service employment, and industries such as the Kaduna Refinery, agro-allied processing,
manufacturing (e.g., Indomie, pure water), quarrying, and cement production. Chikun LGA has a
projected population of 503,242 people in 2020. The population is predominantly Christian, with
roots in traditional African beliefs and a minority Muslim community. This mix of rural
agriculture, urban trading, and industrial activities shapes socio-economic dynamics relevant to
31
3.4 Population of Study
The study population included male and female adults of eighteen (18) years and above. They
totaled 90 the rationale behind restricting the population in Chikun LGA of Kaduna State this is
so because the research aimed at studying persons who have intimate partners in the study area.
The study also involved Police and Medical Officers who were interviewed as experts who can
provide useful information concerning the cases of casualty associated with the perpetration and
To ensure convenience and avoid over-emphasis on the rule of generalization and unnecessary
time wasting, the researcher decide to apply the Taro Yamani (1967) formula to determine the
appropriate number of sample size that could represents general opinion of the total population.
In view of this a total of 73 sample size has been arrived at, which made a true representation of
The instrument used for this study was the questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by
the researcher. Questionnaire was appropriate because the area under study were literate.
Besides, the questionnaire method facilitated easy coverage and is more appropriate in survey
studies of the nature (Nwana, 2018). The questionnaire was tagged Domestic Violence and
The Questionnaire was designed on 5-point Likert Scale of strongly agreed, Agreed, Undecided,
Disagreed and Strongly disagreed. The 24 items in the questionnaire were generated through a
view of previous studies. In scoring the items related to the Likert type 5-point scale, respondents
had a respondent’s opinion. The higher the score, the more influenced the respondent was by the
scale. The design of the questionnaire was clustered around four sections. Section A consists of
items related to the personal data of the respondents such as sex, age while section B to E
contained information dealing with Domestic Violence and Human Right (See Appendix II).
3.6.1 Validity
an effective method for content validation. Consequently, the questionnaire was validated by
three experts in the Department of Social Science, National Open University Kaduna State. They
were requested to judge the appropriateness, comprehensiveness and clarity of items in the
questionnaire. Their contributions in form of suggestions and constructive criticism were used in
33
3.6.2 Reliability
To obtain reliability for factual questions, Oppenheim (1966) in Uzoagulu (2019) suggests that
“internal checks in the form of logical test in the questionnaire should be included”. In line with
this, a number of questions were built into the questionnaire to give a clue to the respondents’
consistency of responses.
A pilot was also carried out with 10 respondents in Chikun Local Government of Kaduna State
to pre-test the efficacy of the questionnaire. The choice of a small sample for the pilot study is in
agreement with the view held by Nworgu (1991) who opines that pilot testing is usually done on
a smaller scale than the main study but under similar conditions. The 10 respondents did not
form part of the main investigation. The respondents were requested to indicate their responses
to each statement by ticking one of the responses built on the Likert type 5-point scale. This was
to ensure that individual opinion about the domestic violence and human right of spouse
The quantitative data generated from the study was analyzed with the aid of the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20. It also involved descriptive statistical analysis
statistics) of independent and dependent variables for the purpose of testing the research
hypothesis. For the qualitative data generated, analysis was done manually through the process
of content analysis.
34
3.8 Data Analysis Matrix
Participants' consent was obtained and confidentiality was maintained. Ethical considerations are
code of conducts that guide the actions of social researchers when dealing with human subjects
during the course of a research study. In other words, they are rules that govern how scientific
research is carried out with stated code of conduct that helps in guiding researchers in the course
of the research study without implicating the respondents who take part in the study. In order to
abide by these codes of conduct, informed consent of the respondents was obtained with their
anonymity ensured and confidentiality guaranteed. More so, the respondents were not forced to
participate in the study as participation was made voluntary. In addition, the respondents were
not exposed to any form of risk and were assured they could withdraw from the research process
35
36