Society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful

purpose, can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A blanket ban on all type of commercials could prove advantageous for society as they
seemingly bring no practical value and potentially cause harm. I mostly disagree with this
viewpoint, since advertising has the potential to elevate product quality and increase the
efficacy of community work.

The first reason for my disagreement is that advertising contribute considerably to market
competition. This is because most of customers tend to seek out for superior alternatives to
consumes. For this reason, advertisements can inform buyers of company’s products and entice
them to switch between brands. Ultimately, this force companies themselves to produce higher
quality or innovative goods to compete, thereby improving the overall quality of products in the
market.

A further explanation for my opposition is that advertising serves as a powerful tool for
propagating the social initiatives of companies. Consumers tend to gravitate toward brands that
demonstrate active engagement in societal contributions. Therefore, by leveraging advertising
platforms to publicize their campaigns, socially responsible companies can effectively expand
their market presence. Vinmart, as an example, after the advertising campaign that announced
they was providing free meals for the poor during covid-19, witnessed a significant spike in
revenue in the following months.

However, I concede that infomercials may induce unnecessary purchases. To remain

competitive in the market, businesses often employ different marketing channels to create
artificial demands from consumers, stimulating impulsive purchases. Consequently, this may
result in individuals squandering money on useless products and services, rendering undue
financial burden.

In conclusion, advertising is beneficial to society in term of enhancing product quality and

attracting public attention into company’s social campaigns, despite a minor drawback involving
financial issues for consumers. Therefore, I consider that a ban on advertising might not as
advantageous to the public as would be commonly believed.
Young people committing crimes should be treated the same as adults by the authorities. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?

Expert claim that juvenile delinquency should receive ordinary criminal prosecution. I strongly
support this notion, as it can discourage future offenses, uphold justice for the victims, and
promote uniformity in legal processes.

The primary justification for my agreement is that this strategy can reduce criminal activities.
Specifically, when under impression they will be punished less severe than adults when
committing crimes, young offender may underestimate the consequential punishments and
normalize criminal endeavors. Conversely, being subject to ordinary sentencing emphasize the
true significance of wrong doings, deterring young individuals from committing crimes.

Additional support for my positive view is that this suggestion ensure that justice is served for
the victims of crimes. Indeed, they endure trauma and loss regardless of offender’s age,
therefore, it is only fair that the punishment reflects the severity of the crime as well as the
harm caused to them. Ultimately, holding a young criminal to the same standard as an adult can
guarantee justness within society.

Another benefit I consider emerges from this strategy is the consistency in law enforcement. It
establishes a common sentencing framework for criminals regardless of their age, which
reduces the risk of law evasion. For instance, illegal debt collecting organizations in Vietnam
often employ teenagers to perform violent endeavors for their business, in order to mitigate
legal repercussion due to their age. For this reason, treating young offenders as adults improves
the clarity and uniformity of the legal system.

In conclusion, I firmly advocate for imposing punishments on young criminal as they are applied
on adults, since this practice can act as a deterrence for future offenders, an assurance of
fairness for victims of crimes, and foster consistency in legal proceedings.
A large number of tourists are visiting a natural area, such as a beach or a forest. What are the
causes and effects of this?

Nowadays, travellers want to go sight-seeing in natural sites, including coastline or jungles. This
trend results from the pollution problems of cities and the attractive adventures these places
may bring to visitors. Although it may cause harm to nature, financial benefits emerge from this
trend.

There are many reasons for this phenomenon. The main cause is because of the degrade
environment in urban centers. As the population in metropolises continue to grow, pollution
level rise from the increased human activities. Consequently, people desire for a destination in
nature, where they can find cleaner air for a health vacation. Additionally, many are drawn to
natural regions for adventure. Unlike tourist attractions in cities, natural locations encourage
many adventurous activities such as hiking or camping, which give visitor memorable and exotic
experiences that broaden their horizons.

However, people visiting natural areas result in both drawbacks and benefits. As a negative,
they contribute to environmental degradation. Indeed, the increased level of human activities
often leads to habitat destruction, pollution and disturbance to wildlife. For instance, people are
like litter the forest with non-biodegradable waste, which negatively affect the ecosystem of
natural area. In contrast, this trend many bring economic benefits. As tourist members increase,
it can improve local economies by creating jobs, generating revenue from accommodation,
dining or the sale of goods, ultimately enhancing the prosperity of local communities.

In conclusion, the increasing level of tourist visiting natural area results from the pollution levels
of cities and the desire for adventurous vacations. Despite the negative effects it may bring to
the surrounding environment, this trend contributes significantly to the improvement of local
economies. By linking tourism revenue to conservation, natural areas can be preserved while
also generating economic development.
In the past, people store knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the
internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

People used to rely on books as repositories of knowledge; however, the internet has largely
taken over this role. This essay will argue the benefits of this trend outweigh the downsides,
despite some valid concerns.

One significant advantage of storing knowledge on the internet is the superior accessibility.
Indeed, information can be accessed virtually anywhere in the world at any time. This has
democratized knowledge, allowing people from various socio-background to access information
that previously limited to those who could afford books or had access to well-stocked libraries.
For example, students in remote areas can now access academic journals, online courses, or
plethora of educational resources, enhancing their learning experiences.

Another benefit is the interactivity and multimedia capabilities of the internet. Specifically,
knowledge is not just stored in text form but also be presented through video, podcasts or
interactive simulations. This variety caters to different learning styles and can make complex
information more comprehensive and engaging. For example, a medical student can watch
surgical procedures online, gaining insights that are difficult to capture in textbooks.

However, there are disadvantages to storing knowledge on the internet. One major concern is
the reliability and credibility of information. Unlike books, which typically undergo rigorous
evaluation and editorial processes, online content can be published by anyone, leading to the
spread of misinformation.

In conclusion, while there are drawbacks to storing knowledge on the internet, such as
dissemination of inaccurate information, advantages largely prevail in terms of hassle-free
accessibility and multimedia capabilities on the internet. It is imperative for users to navigate
this digital terrain with critical thinking skills and verify the authenticity of sources to avoid
being misled by inaccurate information.
Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need.
Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.
Which viewpoint do you agree with?

Advertising plays a crucial role in shaping consumer preferences. Some

argue that it persuades people to buy unnecessary products, while others
believe it informs consumers about innovations that enhance their lives. In
my opinion, while advertising can sometimes lead to impulsive purchases, it
is also an essential tool for introducing valuable products to the public.

On one hand, advertising often encourages people to buy things they do not
actually need. Companies use persuasive techniques, such as emotional
appeals, celebrity endorsements, and limited-time offers, to create a sense
of urgency. As a result, consumers may purchase items simply because they
are attracted to the advertisement rather than because they genuinely need
the product. For instance, many people buy expensive skincare products
after seeing advertisements promising flawless skin, even though basic
skincare routines could be equally effective. Additionally, social media
advertisements frequently promote trending gadgets, many of which end up
being unused after the initial excitement fades.

On the other hand, advertising serves an important function by informing

people about new and useful products. Many technological advancements,
such as smart home devices, electric vehicles, and health-monitoring
wearables, have gained popularity through advertising. Without effective
promotion, consumers might not learn about these innovations, which can
significantly improve their quality of life. For example, robotic vacuum
cleaners have become widely known due to advertising, and they have
helped busy individuals save time on household chores.

In conclusion, while advertising can sometimes lead to unnecessary

spending, it also plays a vital role in introducing valuable products that
enhance modern living. Therefore, rather than blaming advertisements,
consumers should develop critical thinking skills to distinguish between
essential and non-essential purchases.
Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish
produced?

In recent years, the amount of waste produced globally has increased at an

alarming rate. This trend is mainly due to overconsumption, the rise of
single-use products, and inadequate waste management systems. To
combat this issue, governments must take proactive steps to regulate waste
production and promote more sustainable practices.

One of the main reasons for increasing rubbish is the rise in consumerism.
With the growth of the global economy, people are buying more goods than
ever before, often replacing items that are still usable. Fast fashion, for
example, encourages consumers to purchase cheap clothing that is quickly
discarded. Moreover, many products are now packaged in excessive
amounts of plastic and other non-biodegradable materials, which adds
significantly to the waste problem. The widespread use of single-use items
like plastic bags, disposable cutlery, and coffee cups further worsens the
situation.

To address this growing issue, governments can implement several

measures. Firstly, they can introduce stricter regulations on packaging,
requiring companies to use recyclable or biodegradable materials. Secondly,
imposing higher taxes on single-use plastics could discourage both
manufacturers and consumers from relying on them. Additionally,
governments should invest in public awareness campaigns that educate
people about the environmental impact of waste and promote the 3Rs:
Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. Providing better recycling facilities and
encouraging community-based waste management programs can also make
a significant difference.

In conclusion, the increase in rubbish is mainly driven by our modern

consumption habits and poor waste policies. However, through strong
government intervention [su can thiep], education, and sustainable
regulations, the amount of waste produced can be significantly reduced. By
taking these steps, societies can move towards a cleaner and more
sustainable future.
Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach
every young person how to be a good parent.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a
person needs to be a good parent.

Parenting is one of the most important responsibilities in life, yet many

people are unprepared for it. Some believe that schools should include
parenting education in the curriculum to prepare young people for their
future roles. I strongly agree with this idea/ notion/ perspective, as teaching
parenting skills can help build more responsible, caring, and emotionally
intelligent adults.

Firstly, many people become parents without any prior knowledge or

training, which can lead to mistakes that affect a child's emotional and
physical development. Introducing parenting education in schools can raise
awareness about the importance of empathy, patience, and communication
—qualities essential for raising healthy and confident children. For example,
students could learn about child development, discipline strategies, and how
to provide emotional support to their future children.

Secondly, learning how to be a good parent encourages young people to

think more seriously about family planning and personal responsibility. It
may also help reduce issues such as child neglect or abuse, which
sometimes result from a lack of understanding about children's needs. In
addition, students can develop better relationships with their own parents by
gaining insight into the challenges of parenting.

A good parent needs a wide range of skills, including the ability to listen,
guide, and provide consistent care. They should be emotionally stable,
supportive, and capable of setting boundaries while also offering love and
encouragement. Furthermore, financial literacy and time management are
also valuable skills for raising children in a stable environment.

In conclusion, teaching parenting in schools is a proactive way to prepare

young people for future responsibilities. By learning how to be good parents,
they are more likely to raise healthy, well-adjusted children, which benefits
society as a whole.
More and more people nowadays visit well-known places to take
photographs of themselves, without looking at tl1e place.
Why do you think this is happening? Is it a positive or a negative
trend?

In recent years, a growing number of tourists have been visiting famous

destinations mainly to take selfies or photos of themselves, often paying
little attention to the actual location or its cultural significance. This
phenomenon is largely driven by the rise of social media and the desire for
online attention. While this trend may have some positive effects, I believe it
is mostly negative.

One main reason behind this behavior is the influence of social media
platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. People are increasingly
focused on capturing perfect pictures to gain likes, followers, and social
validation. As a result, sightseeing becomes secondary to creating visually
appealing content. In many cases, tourists rush through attractions, taking
quick photos without truly engaging with the history or beauty of the place.

Another factor is the rise of influencer culture, where people are motivated
to present a glamorous lifestyle. Visiting famous places and sharing
attractive images has become a form of status symbol, which overshadows
the genuine experience of travel.

This trend has several downsides. Firstly, it reduces travel to a superficial

act, where the emphasis is on appearance rather than meaningful
exploration or learning. Tourists may miss the cultural, historical, or natural
significance of the destination. Secondly, it can lead to overcrowding in
certain spots, especially those considered "Instagrammable," causing
damage to fragile environments or historical landmarks.

On the positive side, taking and sharing photos can help promote tourism
and encourage others to explore the world. However, when the focus shifts
entirely to self-promotion, the true value of travel is lost.

In conclusion, the rise of photography-focused tourism is mainly driven by

social media and the pursuit of popularity. While it may have some
promotional benefits, it is largely a negative trend as it undermines the
authentic experience and appreciation of travel.
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have
time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?

In modern society, it is increasingly common for people to hire others to

handle tasks they either dislike or lack time for, such as household chores
and childcare. While this approach provides job opportunities and helps
individuals manage their busy lives, it also raises questions about the
importance of personal responsibility and family bonding.

Hiring others to manage domestic tasks can create valuable employment

opportunities. For example, professional cleaners, babysitters, and personal
assistants benefit financially from such work, contributing to the local
economy. This is especially beneficial for low-skilled workers who may have
limited job options. Moreover, outsourcing these tasks allows individuals to
focus on their careers or personal development. For instance, busy
professionals can dedicate more time to their jobs, enhancing productivity
and potentially improving their career prospects.

However, relying too much on paid help can weaken family relationships and
reduce personal responsibility. Taking care of household chores and children
helps build life skills and fosters a sense of shared responsibility among
family members. For example, involving children in simple tasks such as
setting the table or folding laundry can teach them discipline and teamwork.
Furthermore, spending time with children rather than outsourcing childcare
promotes emotional bonds and strengthens family connections.

In conclusion, while paying others to handle domestic tasks can create job
opportunities and help individuals manage their time better, excessive
reliance on outsourcing may weaken family ties and reduce essential life
skills. Therefore, a balanced approach is necessary, where people manage
some household responsibilities themselves while seeking help only when
necessary.
Some consumers are increasingly choosing to buy goods that are
produced in their local area, rather than imported goods.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or a negative trend?

In recent years, many consumers have shown a growing preference for

purchasing locally produced goods instead of imported products. This shift
can be attributed to several key reasons, and I believe it reflects a positive
trend for both local economies and the environment.

One primary reason why people are opting for local products is the desire to
support local businesses and strengthen the economy. Buying locally
produced goods helps to sustain small and medium-sized enterprises, which
are often the backbone of the local economy. This, in turn, creates more job
opportunities and fosters economic growth within the community. For
instance, farmers' markets have become increasingly popular in Canada,
where consumers prefer to buy fresh produce directly from local farmers,
ensuring that money stays within the local economy.

Another significant reason is the growing awareness of environmental issues.

Locally produced goods generally have a lower carbon footprint compared to
imported products because they do not require long-distance transportation.
This reduction in shipping and packaging helps to decrease greenhouse gas
emissions and waste production. For example, purchasing locally grown
vegetables reduces the need for refrigeration and fuel consumption
associated with importing produce from overseas.

Furthermore, locally produced goods are often perceived to be of higher

quality and freshness. Consumers trust the origin of the products and value
the transparency provided by local producers regarding production methods
and ingredients. This fosters a sense of connection and trust between
producers and consumers, which is often lacking with imported goods.

Overall, this trend toward buying local products is positive. It not only boosts
local economies and creates jobs but also promotes environmental
sustainability and enhances consumer trust. While some imported goods
remain essential due to availability and cost, encouraging local production
and consumption can lead to a more sustainable and resilient economy.
Some people say that it is better to work for a large company than a
small one.
Do you agree or disagree?

When it comes to career choices, many people prefer to work for large
companies due to the perceived benefits of stability, structure, and career
growth. While small companies also offer unique advantages, I personally
agree that working for a large company tends to be more beneficial overall.

One major advantage of working in a large company is job security and

access to a wide range of resources. These companies are usually financially
stable and well-established, which reduces the risk of sudden layoffs or
business closures. Additionally, large corporations typically offer better
benefit packages, such as health insurance, paid leave, and retirement
plans, which can greatly improve an employee’s quality of life.

Moreover, large organizations often have clear pathways for promotion and
career advancement. Employees may have opportunities to work in different
departments, receive professional training, or even relocate internationally.
For example, a friend of mine who works for a multinational tech company
was offered the chance to attend training abroad, which significantly boosted
her skills and confidence.

On the other hand, small companies may offer a more relaxed environment
and closer relationships among staff. Employees might have more flexible
roles, allowing them to gain a broader range of experience. However, these
roles can also lack structure and long-term stability. Career advancement in
small businesses is often limited due to fewer leadership positions and
financial constraints.

In conclusion, while small companies have their own appeal, I believe

working for a large company provides greater job security, structured career
development, and better employee benefits. These factors make large
companies a more attractive choice for long-term professional growth.
When we meet someone for the first time, we generally decide very
quickly what kind of person we think they are and if we like them or
not. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

When we meet someone for the first time, we tend to form an immediate
impression about their personality and character. This instinctive reaction
can be beneficial in some situations but also problematic in others. In my
opinion, while quick judgments can sometimes be useful, they often lead to
inaccurate assumptions and should be approached with caution.

On the one hand, making quick assessments about people can be

advantageous in certain scenarios. For instance, in professional settings such
as job interviews or business meetings, individuals often have limited time to
make decisions. A firm handshake, confident posture, and clear
communication may create a positive impression, helping to establish trust
and credibility. Additionally, first impressions can sometimes serve as a
protective mechanism. If someone exhibits suspicious behavior, our instincts
may warn us to be cautious, potentially preventing harm or negative
experiences.

On the other hand, snap judgments are not always reliable. People’s
appearances, body language, or mannerisms may not accurately reflect their
true character. For example, a shy or introverted individual may be mistaken
for being unfriendly or uninterested when, in reality, they are simply
nervous. Moreover, unconscious biases can influence our perceptions,
leading to unfair judgments based on superficial factors such as clothing,
accent, or social background. This can result in missed opportunities for
meaningful connections and collaborations.

In conclusion, while quick judgments can sometimes be useful, they are

often misleading and should not be the sole basis for evaluating others.
Taking the time to understand a person’s true nature through deeper
interactions can lead to more accurate and fair assessments, fostering better
relationships both personally and professionally.
In the past, most working people had only one job. However,
nowadays, more and more people have more than one job at the
same time.
What are the reasons for this development?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more than
one job?

It is increasingly common for people to hold down more than one job. Gone
are the days when people could rely on one source of income to satisfy their
financial needs. I would like to consider the reasons for this change and
outline its advantages and disadvantages.

People take on extra work because making ends meet [kiem song] has become so challenging.
In recent years, the cost of living has risen exponentially [tang theo cap so nhan], making it a
real challenge to break even at the end of the month. Additionally, advertising companies
relentlessly promote the idea that more wealth means more happiness, a concept that many
people believe. They may take more freelance jobs or weekend work in the hope of improving
their lot [=wealth] in live.

A person with more than one job may experience several benefits. Diversifying your skills and
gaining more experience can make you more employable when negotiating the highly
competitive job market. Avoid putting all your eggs in one basket also a wise move as you have
something to fall back on if one source of your income stops.

There are also many downsides to this situation. Working for more than one company can
quickly leave a person feeling overworked and burnt out. It also leaves limited time for being
with family and friends or doing things you enjoy. What’s more, when you are spread too thin,
you may produce poor-quality work.

Overall, I think it is important to remain balanced. Having an additional source of income can be
beneficial if you keep work in its place, but it is not worth damaging your health and
relationships for the sake of a slightly larger bank balance.
Some people dislike changes in their society and in their own lives,
and want things to stay the same.
Why do some people want things to stay the same?
Why should change be regarded as something positive?

Change is a natural part of life, yet not everyone embraces it. Some people
prefer stability and familiarity, avoiding changes in their society and personal
lives. While resistance to change can offer comfort, it can also hinder growth
and progress. This essay will explore the reasons behind people’s reluctance
to change and highlight why change can be beneficial.

One primary reason why some individuals resist change is due to fear of the
unknown. Humans often feel secure in familiar routines and environments,
which provide a sense of predictability and control. For instance, employees
may resist technological advancements in the workplace because they worry
about losing their jobs or struggling to adapt to new systems. Additionally,
older generations might oppose social changes, such as new cultural norms
or progressive values, as they feel disconnected from these developments.
This reluctance is often rooted in a desire for stability and a reluctance to
leave their comfort zones.

On the other hand, change can bring about significant advantages. It often
leads to personal growth, innovation, and societal progress. Embracing
change enables individuals to develop new skills, adapt to new challenges,
and seize better opportunities. For example, those who embrace
technological changes in their careers are likely to stay competitive and
relevant in a rapidly evolving job market. Moreover, change can foster a
more inclusive [hoa nhap] and dynamic [nang dong] society. Social
movements that challenge outdated beliefs have paved the way for greater
equality and acceptance.

In conclusion, while some people prefer things to stay the same due to fear
of uncertainty and a desire for stability, change should be viewed positively.
It drives growth, encourages adaptability, and leads to a better future.
Therefore, embracing change can lead to personal and societal development,
ultimately enriching people’s lives.
In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in
shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or
using phones.

Do you think this will happen one day?

Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using
cash?

In the modern world, the use of digital payments is rapidly increasing, raising
the possibility that cash may one day become obsolete. While it is likely that
electronic payments will dominate in the future, some people may resist this
change due to various concerns.

One reason why cashless transactions may become the norm is the
convenience and efficiency they offer. Digital payments, such as credit cards
and mobile payment apps, are fast, secure, and reduce the need to carry
physical money. For instance, paying bills, shopping online, and even
splitting restaurant bills can be done quickly and easily through
smartphones. Moreover, digital transactions are traceable, making it easier
to manage expenses and prevent fraud.

However, not everyone is willing to give up cash completely. Some people

prefer cash for privacy reasons since it does not leave a digital trail. For
example, individuals who value anonymity in their purchases may feel
uncomfortable with every transaction being recorded. Additionally, older
generations and those who are not tech-savvy may struggle to adapt to
digital payments. They may feel insecure about handling technology or worry
about potential cybercrime and data breaches.

Furthermore, a cashless society could disadvantage certain groups. People

living in rural areas or low-income individuals may lack access to banking
services or digital payment tools. Cash is often the only option for them, and
relying solely on electronic payments could exclude these communities from
participating in the economy.

In conclusion, while it is possible that physical cash may eventually

disappear as digital payments become more prevalent, the transition would
not be seamless. Concerns about privacy, accessibility, and technology
adoption mean that cash will likely remain an important payment option for
the foreseeable future. Society must ensure that advancements in digital
payments are inclusive and considerate of those who rely on cash.
In some countries, more and more people are hiring a personal
fitness trainer, rather than playing sports or doing exercise classes.

What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or a negative

development?

In recent years, there has been a noticeable rise in the number of people
choosing to hire personal fitness trainers rather than participating in group
exercise classes or sports. This trend is primarily driven by the desire for
customized fitness programs and greater flexibility. In my opinion, this is a
largely positive development with some minor drawbacks.

One major reason people prefer personal trainers is the level of individual
attention they receive. A personal trainer can design a workout plan tailored
to a person’s specific fitness goals, body type, age, and health condition. For
instance, someone recovering from an injury may need exercises that are
safer and more suitable than what is offered in a general class. Moreover,
trainers provide real-time feedback on technique, which helps reduce the
risk of injury and improve results more efficiently.

Another factor is convenience and motivation. Many people with busy

schedules find it hard to attend fixed-time group classes or team practices.
Personal trainers often offer flexible hours and even at-home or virtual
sessions. This makes it easier for individuals to stay consistent. Additionally,
having a trainer increases accountability, which can be a strong motivator
for people who struggle with self-discipline.

While this trend has clear benefits, some may argue that it reduces
opportunities for social interaction and teamwork that come with sports or
group classes. However, for people focused on specific fitness goals, the
advantages of personalized coaching usually outweigh these concerns.

In conclusion, the growing preference for personal fitness trainers is driven

by the need for tailored fitness support and flexibility. Although it may limit
social interaction to some extent, it is a positive development that
encourages a healthier and more disciplined lifestyle.
Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be
given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into
their private life?

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Famous people often live under constant media scrutiny, leading to debates
about whether they are treated unfairly and deserve more privacy or if such
intrusion is an inevitable consequence of fame. Both perspectives have valid
arguments, but a balanced approach is needed.

On the one hand, some argue that the media’s intense focus on celebrities’
personal lives is excessive and harmful. Constant attention can lead to
mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, as celebrities struggle
to cope with the pressure of always being in the spotlight. For instance,
many celebrities have publicly shared their struggles with intrusive paparazzi
and tabloid rumors [tin don bao la cai], which can distort the truth [bop meo
su that]and damage reputations. Moreover, famous people are still human
beings entitled to personal space and privacy, just like anyone else. The lack
of privacy can disrupt their relationships and make it difficult to live a normal
life. Therefore, it seems unjust for the media to exploit celebrities' private
moments solely for profit.

On the other hand, some believe that public exposure is a reasonable trade-
off for the benefits of fame. Many celebrities actively seek attention to
promote their work, and their careers often depend on media coverage. Fans
are eager to know about their favorite stars’ lives, and the media caters to
this demand. Additionally, some argue that fame comes with privileges, such
as wealth and influence, so enduring public interest is a small price to pay.
Celebrities who choose to work in entertainment or sports know that
attention comes with the territory, and media scrutiny is part of their public
image.

In my opinion, while public interest in celebrities is natural, the media should

respect boundaries and avoid invading private lives. Celebrities deserve the
right to privacy when off-duty, and sensationalist reporting [tin tuc giat gan]
should be discouraged. Striking a balance between legitimate public interest
and personal privacy would ensure a healthier relationship between
celebrities and the media. Responsible journalism and ethical reporting
practices are essential in achieving this balance.