HRE Module 1 PDF
HRE Module 1 PDF
[2020]
VISION
A provide of relevant and quality education to a
society where citizens are competent, skilled,
dignified and community- oriented.
MISSION
An academic institution providing technological,
professional, research and extension programs to form
principled men and women of competencies and skills
responsive to local and global development needs.
QUALITY POLICY
Northwest Samar State University commits to provide
quality outcomes-based education, research,
extension and production through continual
improvement of all its programs, thereby producing
world class professionals.
CORE VALUES
Resilience. Integrity. Service. Excellence.
Table of Contents
Rationale
The learner guide aims to provide an outline of the topics, assessment types and date of
submission of outputs. The topics listed are the lessons covered in the module. On the other hand,
the Assessment types listed are the activities or test that students have to complete for each lesson.
The date of submission or return of module is also provided.
For most of the lessons, there are six parts. First is Let’s Hit these, which lists the objectives
to be achieved for each lesson. Second part is Let’s Get Started. This part provides the starting
activities for the topic. Let’s Find out gives the answer or an explanation to the activity provided
in Let’s Get Started. The third part is Let’s Read. In this, the students are provided with readings
which elaborate on the topic. Fourthly, it is followed by the part – Let’s Remember, which provides
a summary of the topic. Lastly is the Let’s do this part. Students are required to do tasks which
include answering tests or performing an activity. Rubrics for grading are also provided to assess
their learning of the topic.
Course Description:
Course Outcomes:
At the end of the course, students must be able to:
1. Recognize the laws related to human rights.
2. Exemplify the values advanced by human rights education advocates- promoting
fairness, tolerance, and dignity and respect to the dignity of others.
3. Construct a case study analysis about the current situation/s of Human Rights
Education in the Philippines.
Course Content:
As explained above, Human Rights (CLJ 2) introduces students the concept, theories,
principles and practice, discusses the functions to come up interventions addressing problems.
The table below shows the outline of the topics to be discussed in the lecture per week vis-
à-vis the course outcomes. It is designed based on the course syllabus approved by the college
Dean in the College of Arts and Sciences.
II. History,
Theories of
Sources and
Development of
Human Rights
Course Requirements:
In general, the requirements of CLJ 2 are as follows:
▪ Case Analysis
▪ Case Study
Grading Criteria:
Requirement/Assessment Task Percentage
Major Course Output 50%
Major Exams 30%
Class Standing 20%
TOTAL 100%
Course Materials:
▪ Rubrics
▪ Course policies
References
Module 1
Module Description:
This module provides readings and appropriate learning activities that are designed to
convey the nature and concepts of human rights. Learning activities help to develop the students
understanding and evoke insights about the topic/s.
This module contains three main lessons. At the beginning of the module, students are
required to answer a pre-test. A series of engaging activities are given each lesson to see if the
students acquired the insights that the course generally conveys. A post-test is also given at the
end of the module to see if the important concepts were learned.
Students are required to submit the outputs on or before the last week of September.
Module Guide:
The students are encouraged to work independently on given activities which are prepared
by the instructor to gauge the understanding of the students on a particular topic.
Module Outcomes:
Module Requirements:
At the start of each lesson, a pre-test is given to assess the working knowledge of students
about the topic and an evaluation at the end of each lesson is also given to assess their
understanding on given discussions.
At the end of this module, the students will come up with an answered activity based on
what they learned.
Module Pretest:
1. It is a law which originated from the Stoics and elaborated by Greek philosophers
Plato and Aristotle and later by ancient Roman law.
A. Positivist Theory
B. Historical Theory
C. Functional or Sociological Approach
D. Natural Law Theory
2. Which theory or approach states that, “theological approach is valid as long as men
believe that God created them’.
A. Natural Theory
B. Theory based on Dignity of Man
C. Marxist Theory
D. Religious Approaches
A. Value-oriented approach
B. Magna Carta of 1215
C. American Bill of Rights
D. Sociological approach
4. The ultimate goal of Theory based on Dignity of Man is a world community where
there is___________________ and ___________________.
A. Utilitarian Theory
B. Natural Law
C. Positivist Theory
D. Functional Approach
6. Human rights can be enforced without borders because human rights are:
a. Inalienable
b. Imprescriptible
c. Universal
d. Indivisible
7. Which of the following aspects of human rights are guaranteed by the 1987
Philippine Constitution thru the Commission on Human Rights?
a. Political rights
b. Civil rights
c. Economic rights
d. All of the above
8. International community must treat human rights in equal manner, same footing and
same emphasis because human rights are:
a. universal
b. interdependent
c. inalienable
d. non-discriminatory
9. We cannot enjoy civil and political rights unless we enjoy economic, cultural and social
rights consequently, we must enjoy economic cultural and social rights (equality) to be
able to enjoy civil and political rights (liberty) because human rights are:
a. universal
b. interdependent
c. inalienable
d. non-discriminatory
10. Which of these rights does not belong to the 2nd generation of human rights?
a. environmental rights
b. right of self determination
c. right to education
d. right of self determination
Modified true or false. Write TRUE if the statement is correct. Write FALSE if the statement is
erroneous and write the correct answer which makes the statement false. Write your answers in
the space provided.
_________________1. Human rights are alienable because they cannot be rightfully taken
away from a free individual.
_________________2. Derogable rights are also known as absolute rights.
_________________3. The Second Generation of Human Rights covers collective rights.
_________________4. The First Generation of Human Rights covers civil and political
rights.
_________________5. 2nd generation of human rights include the right to form and join
organized unions.
Key Terms:
Learning Plan
Lesson No: 1
Sources:
[Link]
[Link]
If you carefully analyze the pictures above, it depicts how people are clamoring in protests
for certain recognition. The pictures represent how some segments in our society tries to lobby
equality and respect for what they believe to be their rights. Why do you think some people would
go to streets and be burdened by lobbying for recognition even those of other’s rights? What do
you think could be the impact on our state if we fail to recognize discriminations amongst our
community?
The pictures above would give you an insight on the possible effect when governments or
society in general fail to acknowledge people’s rights. More so, if the violations pertain to the
rights which are essential in every person’s existence. What do you think could have been the result
of the violations of people’s basic rights throughout history? These essential rights are the very
core of this course. Thus, the human rights education.
Let’s Read:
Human rights violations date back to as early as the biblical times. Biblical accounts tell us
that Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity, himself was denied his due process when he was
unjustly tried, sentenced to death and crucified in the most inhuman manner.
I bet you all have seen the “Spolarium” of Juan Luna—reflecting the scene in the
Spolarium—the place where dead slave warriors are piled up during the Roman Empire when
human battles were considered legal and a sort of entertainment for kings and royalties; or are you
familiar with the films Django Unchained or 12 years of slave? These stories were not just made
for arts’ sake or entertainment. There are truths to these stories—that’s the sad truth, we live in a
world where these stories happened, are happening and where more human rights violations could
have happened every day.
Human rights are aggregate of privileges, claim, benefits, entitlements and moral
guarantees that pertain to man because of his humanity. It is a system of values or elements which
are inherent to human dignity. (Sarmiento, 2014)
Human rights are universal legal guarantees protecting individuals and groups against
actions which interfere with fundamental freedoms and human dignity. Human rights are
generally defined as those rights which are inherent in our nature and without which, we cannot live
as human beings. These rights and fundamental freedoms allow us to develop and use our human
qualities, intelligence, talents and conscience, and to satisfy our spiritual and other needs. The
dignity of man and human life is inviolable. From the dignity of man is derived the right of every
person to free development of his personality. It's the essence of these rights that make man human.
(Coquia, 2012)
• As to Source:
• According to recipient:
A. Civil rights—those rights which the law will force at the instance of private
individuals for the purpose of securing to them the enjoyment of their happiness.
B. Political rights—those rights which enables us to participate in running the affairs
of the government either directly or indirectly.
C. Economic and Social rights—those which the law confers upon the people to
enable them to achieve social and economic development, thereby ensuring them their
well-being, happiness and financial security.
D. Cultural rights—those rights that ensure the well-being of the individual and foster
the preservation, enrichment, and dynamic evolution of national culture based on the
principle of unity in diversity in a climate of free artistic and intellectual expression.
A. First Generation of Human Rights—covers civil and political rights which derives
primarily from the 17th and 18th centuries reformist theories e.g. Locke, Hobbes, etc.,
and which are associated with the English, American and French revolutions. It
conceives of human rights more in negative (“freedoms from”) than positive (“rights
to) terms; it favors the abstention rather than the intervention of government in the
exercise of freedoms and in the quest for human dignity. It serves as the protection the
individuals from the arbitrary exercise of police power.
rights more in positive terms, i.e. “right to…” They are fundamental claims to social
equality.
C. Third and Fourth Generation Human Rights— covers collective rights. While
drawing upon, interlinking and reconceptualizing value demands associated with the
first and second generations of rights, it is best understood as a product, albeit one still
in formation, of both the rise and decline of the nation-States in the last half of the 20th
century.
• According to derogability
A. Non-derogable— those that cannot be suspended nor taken away nor restricted/
limited even in the extreme emergency and even if the government invokes national
security.
B. Derogable or relative rights—those that may be suspended or restricted or limited
depending on the circumstances which call for the preservation of social life.
Let’s Remember:
Human rights are generally defined as those rights, which are inherent in our nature
and without which, we cannot live as human beings.
Human rights and fundamental freedoms allow us to develop and use our human
qualities, intelligence, talents and conscience, and to satisfy our spiritual and other needs.
The dignity of man and human life is inviolable. From the dignity of man is derived the right
of every person to free development of his personality.
The denial of human rights and fundamental freedom not only is an individual and
personal tragedy, but also creates social and political unrest, sowing the seeds of violence
and conflict within and between societies and nations. As the first sentence of the Declaration
of Human Rights states, “respect for human rights and human dignity is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world.” (Coquia, 2012)
Let’s Do This:
Direction: Get one whole sheet of yellow paper and explain the following.
Each item will be graded five points. Use the criteria below to construct your answer.
10. Problem:
Mr. X has been charged with violation of R.A. 9208 or the Human Trafficking
Law. He has been tried and convicted for the said crime in the Regional Trial
Court of Calbayog City. Mr. X, believing that he was unjustly convicted,
wanted to appeal the decision to the appellate court. The right to appeal is
guaranteed under the law. However, 13 days later his lawyer withdrew from
the case. Failing to secure the help of another counsel, the decision became
final. Under the law, a decision becomes final after 15 days without filing an
appeal. Mr. X still wanted to appeal the decision on the ground that his human
right has been violated when his right to appeal is denied and that the right to
appeal is imprescriptible.
Do you agree with Mr. X’s contention (that the denial of his appeal
constitutes human rights violation)? Explain. (7 pts)
Let’s Check:
Criteria for Checking:
Insight into subject– 3 pts.
Originality -1 pt.
Sentence construction – 1 pt.
Total: 5 points
Suggested Readings:
Learning Plan
Lesson No: 2
Do you believe that men evolved from apes? Make a comment on it.
Source:
[Link]
evolved-72743121/
Do you believe that men evolved from apes? This must be a popular question about the
origin of men. Some may agree while most would refuse to be likened to an ape. A lot of
explanation came up about this subject but just like how the origin of men is a popular topic for
discussion, so are the sources of our human rights.
The picture above tells us a famous theory about the origin of men. Now, let’s discuss the
different theories in regard to sources of our human rights.
Let’s Read:
Ancient history tells us that Rulers were despotic and tyrannical, and citizens rose against
the injustices that they have long suffered. Men revolted against the concept of the "Divine Right
of Kings." In the Middle Ages, the Magna Carta was delivered by King John in 1215. It is regarded
as the first English Constitution that guaranteed the personal liberties and civil rights. The
Americans revolting against the English King in 1776 declared their own Bill of Rights. The
French in 1789 proclaimed the Declaration of the Rights of Man where it was declared that all men
are born free and equal and affirmed the inalienable rights of man. Eventually most democratic
countries adopted in their respective constitutions their own Bill of Rights.
But how did men even come up with human rights as we know it? Below are some of the
popular theories of the sources of human rights.
A. Religious or theological approach - doctrine of a Supreme Being, the creator, the Father
of all humanity. Central is the concept of the dignity of man as a consequence of human
rights, and therefore the rights are universal, inalienable and cannot be denied by mortal
beings (men).
The earliest direct precursor to human rights might be found in the notions of
“natural right” developed by classical Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle, but this
concept was more fully developed by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica. For
several centuries Aquinas’ conception held sway: there were goods or behaviours that were
naturally right or wrong because God ordained it so. (Heard, 1997)
During the Renaissance and the decline of feudalism, the shift from natural law as
duties to natural law as rights grew in strength. The Magna Carta of 1215 defined the rights
of English barons and citizens against the crown, grounding its limitation of royal
patronage and exploitation, and affirming the right to religious freedom by appeal to the
authority of tradition and God. Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), signals the turning point away
from the Scholastic tradition with his detailed study of The Rights of War and Peace. He
upheld the idea that the natural law would still have validity even if one conceded "that
which cannot be conceded without the utmost wickedness, that there is no God, or that the
affairs of men are no concern to Him (etiamsi daremus non esse Deum). (Walters, 1995)
B. Natural Law - the conduct of men must always conform to the law of nature, and this
theory is detached from religion. The natural characteristics of human beings are the social
impulse to live peacefully and in harmony with others, and whatever conformed to the
nature of men was right and just. Whatever is disturbing to social harmony is wrong and
unjust.
C. Positivist - states that all rights and authority come from the state and what officials have
promulgated, that rights are enjoyed if recognized and protected by legislation promulgated
by the state.
that results in a declaration, law, treaty, or other normative instrument. These may
vary over time and be subject to derogations or limitations designed to optimize
respect for human rights rather than impose an absolute standard. They become part
of the social order when an authoritative body proclaims them, and they attain a
higher degree of universality based on the participation of virtually every nation in
the norm-creating process, a process that is law-based but that reflects compromise
and historical shifts. (Marks, 2014)
For Karl Marx (1818-83), legal relations and forms of the state are not
grasped from "the general development of the human mind," but rather have their
roots in the material conditions of life and the anatomy of civil society as
determined by political economy. Natural right and rights are individualistic and
abstract. Human emancipation requires ending the division between man as an
"egoistic being" in civil society and man as an "abstract citizen" in the state. The
so-called right to liberty is merely the right of "separation of man from man...The
right of the circumscribed individual, withdrawn into himself" whose practical
application is the right of private property, that is, the right of self-interest. The right
to equality has no political significance either, but is merely a right to liberty
defined in terms of every person being "equally regarded as a self-sufficient
monad." The right to security is nothing more than a police concept that merely
assures civil society's egoism. (Walters, 1995)
the only separate study he devoted to constitutional and human rights, Luhmann
argues more particularly that fundamental freedoms and human rights are not
transhistorical but he considers them as mechanisms for protecting and stabilizing
the functionally differentiated society. By institutionalizing fundamental freedoms
and human rights, modern society protects its own structure against (ever present)
tendencies towards regression or de-differentiation. In other words, human rights
ensure that the differentiation between different functional subsystems is
maintained. By, for instance, institutionalizing religious freedom and freedom of
conscience, modern society prevents the continuous interference of religion and
politics. At the same time, Luhmann argues, human rights ensure the protection of
individual spheres of action typical for modern society. As we shall see, with the
transition towards functional differentiation, the position of the individual becomes
fragile. Hence, the fundamental freedoms and human rights institutionalize specific
mechanisms to increase stability and protection of the individual. (Verschraegen,
2002)
F. Utilitarian Theory - principle that requires governments to maximize the total net sum of
citizens. It emphasizes that an individual cannot be more important than the entire group.
An act is good only when it takes into consideration the interests of the society and tends
to augment the happiness of the entire community.
solely on its contributions for the greater good of all people. It adopts four
mechanisms: welfarism, consequentialism, egalitarianism, and maximization.
Utilitarianism is primarily welfarist in its philosophy. The core foundation of
utilitarianism is the “greatest happiness principle”. It simply states that “actions are
right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to
produce the reverse of happiness”. Utilitarian actions are based solely on its
contributions for the greater good of all people. It adopts four mechanisms:
welfarism, consequentialism, egalitarianism, and maximization. Utilitarianism is
primarily welfarist in its philosophy. (Ropiak, 2015)
G. Theory based on Justice - each person has equal rights to the whole system of liberties.
The general conception of justice is one of fairness and those social primary goods such as
opportunity, income and wealth and self-respect are to be distributed equally.
H. Theory based on Equality and Respect - government must treat all their citizens equally,
and must intervene in order to advance the general welfare.
I. Theory based on the Dignity of man - this theory proceeds on the premise that human
rights means sharing values of all identified policies upon which human rights depend on.
The ultimate goal of this theory is a world community where there is democratic sharing
and distribution of values. All available resources are utilized to the maximum and the
protection of human dignity is recognized. This is better referred to as policy science
approach.
Let’s Remember:
These theories are studied to give us a clearer picture in understanding the human rights
concepts. Although these are just theories, they give us a deeper idea of how human rights evolved
and the basis of our supposed treatment and view on their existence.
Some of the popular theories of the sources of human rights are based on religion, the
natural law, positivist theory, Marxist theory, based on sociological approach, utilitarian theory,
on the basis of justice, dignity of man, equality and respect. Each of these theories gives us a
hindsight on why men stood up against the histories of denial of their rights.
Let’s Do This:
Activity 3.
Direction: Answer the following activities in a separate sheet of paper.
1. Among the nine theories mentioned, which of those do you believe the most to be the reason
why we should recognize each other’s human rights? Why? Justify your answer. Cite example/s
if needed.
(Explain in at least five (5) sentences)
Religious or
theological Natural Law Positivist Marxist
approach
THEORIES OF
SOURCES OF HUMAN
RIGHTS
Rubric:
Insight into subject- 2pts
Sentence construction – 1 pt.
Organization of ideas- 2 pts.
Total: 5 points
Let’s Check:
Answered activity will be submitted after the given time. Rubric will be the basis
of checking.
Suggested Readings:
Learning Plan
Lesson No: 3
Sources:
[Link]
[Link]
women-and-girls-experience-on-a-daily-ba/10155404827274864/
The pictures above show diverse violence around the world. Issue of racism, discrimination,
violence against women and children and deprivation of rights to express against the government,
to name a few. These are only some of the violence that advocates are trying to eradicate in the
society. Do you know some? What else can you think of?
From these, let’s take a look at how human rights were introduced in the Philippines as well
as in the international arena.
Let’s Read:
The horrors of World War II led to the creation of a Universal Human Rights System,
facilitated by the then—new United Nations. Hence, the struggle for the respect of human rights
which was originally a domestic or national issue became an international concern.
The Second World War was the defining event for the internationalization of human rights.
In 1940, H.G. Wells wrote The Rights of Man or What are We Fighting For?; Roosevelt announced
the “four freedoms” (freedoms of speech and worship and freedoms from want and fear) in his
1941 State of the Union address; the UN Charter established in 1945 an obligation of all members
to respect and observe human rights and created a permanent commission to promote their
realization; the trial of Nazi doctors defined principles that were codified in the Nuremberg Code
in 1946; and the Nuremberg Trials, in 1945–46, of 24 of the most important captured leaders of
Nazi Germany, established individual criminal responsibility for mass human rights violations.
Each of these events connected with World War II has had major repercussions for human rights
today. In the War’s immediate aftermath, bedrock human rights texts were adopted: the Genocide
Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the Geneva Conventions in
1949, followed in 1966 by the International Covenants on Human Rights and scores of UN and
regional human rights texts on issues such as torture, the rights of the child, minorities,
discrimination against women, and disability rights, along with the creation of investigative and
accountability procedures at the intergovernmental level. Individual criminal responsibility for
mass violations of human rights re-emerged—after the hiatus of the Cold War—in the ad hoc
tribunals on Rwanda and former Yugoslavia and finally in the International Criminal Court.
(Marks, 2014)
While the International arena was prompted by the World War II to develop a system of
human rights, the Philippines also has its own share of human rights origin and history. With a
long history of colonization, Human rights violations and the struggles to put a stop to it is not
foreign to the Filipino people.
•Jose Rizal, the national hero of the Philippines was executed on December
30, 1896 at Bagumbayan for his written works denouncing the abuses of the
Spanish authorities and church friars committed on the Filipinos. He was
1896 arbitrarily arrested and tried by his own persecutors.
•On June 20, 1899, the Malolos COnstitution has been adopted establishing a
Republican government, contained several provisions on civil and political
rights, guaranteeing freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention, freedom
1899 from searches and seizures, freedom to choose domicile and freedom of
religion.
•Said principles were reiterated in the Philippine Bill of 1902, the Philippine
Autonomy Act 1916, otherwise known as the Jone Law, and the Philippine
1935 Independent Act of 1934, known as the Tydings Mcduffie Law. The first
Philippine Constitution was adopted in 1935 which contained the Bill of Rights.
•The Filipinos were temporarily deprived of the enjoyment of the civil and
political rights (embodied in the Bill of Rights) during the military rule of Japan
from 1942 to 1944 but were immediately restored in 1945.
1942-
1944
•The 1986 Constitution was adopted after the 1986 EDSA Revolution which
ousted President Marcos and ended the authoritarian rule. The new
Constitution categorically states that "the State values the dignity of every
1987 human person and guarantees full respect for human rights." (Art. III, Section
11)
Apparently, the delegates who drafted the 1986 Constitution were not fully aware of the
broad concepts of human rights as envisioned in the International Bill of Human Rights consisting
of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant in
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the various international instruments on human rights
adopted by the UN and other international organizations.
Philippine jurisprudence also reveals the narrow concept of human rights under the
Constitution. Thus, the following case:
FACTS
Quimpo informed NEVAI that their stalls should be removed from the questioned
premises to give way to People’s Park. Quimpo later on signed a DEMOLITION NOTICE,
which was sent to NEVAI giving a grace period of 3 days (until July 12 1990) to vacate
On July 12 1990, NEVAI, led by their Pres. Fermo filed a complaint with CHR.
NEVAI wanted CHR to write a letter to Mayor Simon to stop the demolition of NEVAI’s
stalls, sari-sari stores and carinderia along North EDSA.
On July 28 1990, petitioners carried out the demolition and as a result, CHR came
out with a resolution ordering the disbursement of financial assistance of not more than
P200,000.00 in favor of NEVAI to purchase light housing materials and food under the
Commissions supervision and directed petitioners to desist from further demolition, with
warning that violation of order would lead to a citation for contempt and arrest.
ISSUES
Whether or not CHR has the jurisdiction to investigate alleged violations of the
business rights of private respondents whose stalls were demolished by petitioners at
instance and authority given by the Mayor?
Section 18, Article XIII, of the 1987 Constitution - empowers the Commission on
Human Rights to "investigate, on its own or on complaint by any party, all forms of human
rights violations involving civil and political rights"
What are sought to be demolished are the stalls, sari-sari stores and carinderias as
Let’s Remember:
Human Rights was introduced to the Philippines when Jose Rizal wrote about the
abuses of the Spanish authorities in his books and he was executed for it. Since 1896 the
educated Filipinos were already aware of the American and English Bill of Rights, and the
Malolos Constitution was adopted in 1899. It contained provisions that guaranteed freedom
from arbitrary arrest and detention, freedom from searches and seizures, freedom to choose
domicile and freedom of religion.
Generally, the historical events in the Philippines which prompted the Filipinos to
protect and promote human rights include the Colonial Spanish regime when economic and
class discrimination was rife, Military Rule of Japan from 1942-1944 and the declaration of
Martial Law by former President Ferdinand Marcos.
While the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was brought about by
the tragic events during world war II. However, to be legally binding among nations, the
UDHR was transformed into and had been the constant subject of international covenants
thereafter. These covenants were codified to be the now—International Bill of Human
Rights.
Let’s Do This:
Direction.: Answer the following questions in a separate sheet of paper.
1 . What were the circumstances that brought out the concept of human rights in ancient
history?
2. What famous documents in history that contained concepts of human rights? Briefly
discuss of these documents.
5. What historical events in the Philippines prompted Filipinos to protect and promote human
rights?
6. What consist of International Bill of human rights?
7. State and explain the constitutional policy of the Philippines on human rights.
Let’s Check:
Discussion -2 pts.
Organization of ideas- 1 pt.
Total - 3 pts.
Suggested Readings:
acknowledge events and issues affecting human rights in turn gives people a better perspective
towards appreciation of each other.
As your final assessment for this module, cite (1) international and (1) local news
article which discusses an issue in relation to human rights and discuss your understanding about
the issue, give your comments to and your suggestion on how people may address the said issues
concerning human rights. Use the following format:
References