Human Rights Mshetty Notes
Human Rights Mshetty Notes
Recent Developments
1. Human Rights Conferences and Summits: Regular gatherings to address pressing human rights
issues.
2. United Nations Human Rights Council: Established in 2006 to promote and protect human
rights worldwide.
3. International Criminal Court: Created in 2002 to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes,
and crimes against humanity.
4. Human Rights Education and Awareness: Efforts to promote human rights education,
awareness, and advocacy globally.
Natural Rights Theory is the oldest and most influential theory. It states that human rights are
inherent, inborn, and belong to every person simply because they are human. These rights exist
independently of the State and cannot be taken away.
Origin: Developed by philosophers like John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Main Features
Rights are natural and universal.
The State does not create rights but protects them.
Every individual possesses equal rights.
Examples
Right to Life
Right to Liberty
Right to Equality
Right to Property
Merits
Protects human dignity.
Forms the basis of modern human rights.
Inspired constitutional democracies.
Demerits
Difficult to determine which rights are truly "natural."
Ignores social and economic realities.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
2. Legal (Positivist) Theory
According to this theory, rights exist only because they are recognized and enforced by law. The
State is the source of rights.
Origin: Developed by philosophers like Jeremy Bentham, John Austin
Main Features
Law creates rights.
Courts enforce rights.
Rights vary from one country to another.
Merits
Provides legal certainty.
Ensures effective enforcement.
Demerits
Unjust laws may violate human rights.
Gives excessive power to the State.
3. Utilitarian Theory
This theory states that rights should promote the greatest happiness of the greatest number of
people.
Origin: Developed by philosophers like Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill
Main Features
Social welfare is the ultimate goal.
Rights are valuable only if they benefit society.
Merits
Promotes public welfare.
Encourages efficient governance.
Demerits
Minority rights may be ignored.
Individual liberty may be sacrificed.
4. Marxist Theory
According to this theory, human rights cannot be fully enjoyed unless economic inequality is
removed. Civil and political rights alone are insufficient without social and economic justice.
Origin: Developed by philosophers like Karl Marx
Main Features
Economic equality is essential.
Elimination of exploitation.
Emphasis on social and economic rights.
Merits
Promotes equality and social justice.
Protects workers and weaker sections.
Demerits
Gives less importance to civil liberties.
May result in excessive State control.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
6. Universalist Theory
This theory holds that human rights belong equally to every human being regardless of nationality,
race, religion, gender, or culture.
Basis
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes that all human beings are born free and
equal in dignity and rights.
Main Features
Universal application.
Equality and non-discrimination.
Protection of human dignity.
Merits
Encourages international cooperation.
Promotes global peace and justice.
Demerits
Sometimes conflicts with cultural traditions.
Implementation differs among countries.
[Link] Theory
Human rights are based on the autonomy and agency of individuals, who have the capacity to
make choices and exercise their will
Origin: Developed by philosophers like Immanuel Kant and Hannah Arendt. Implication: Human
rights are essential for individual autonomy, dignity, and self-respect
Conclusion
Theories of human rights provide different explanations for the origin, purpose, and protection of
human rights. Natural Rights Theory emphasizes inherent rights, Legal Theory focuses on State
recognition, Utilitarian Theory prioritizes public welfare, Marxist Theory stresses economic justice,
Idealist Theory is based on morality and dignity, Social Contract Theory highlights the relationship
between individuals and the State, and Universalist Theory recognizes human rights as belonging
to all people. Modern international human rights law, especially the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and subsequent international conventions, incorporates principles from these
theories to ensure the protection of human dignity, equality, freedom, and justice worldwide.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
3. Kinds of Human Rights
Introduction
Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every human being simply because
they are human. These rights are universal, inherent, inalienable, indivisible, and essential for
living a life of dignity, equality, and freedom. Human rights are available to all persons irrespective
of race, religion, caste, sex, nationality, language, or social status.
The modern concept of human rights gained international recognition after the adoption of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948 by the United Nations.
1. Civil Rights
Civil rights protect an individual's life, liberty, and personal security against arbitrary action by the
State.
Examples
Right to life
Right to equality
Right to personal liberty
Freedom from torture
Right to privacy
Right to fair trial
Importance: Civil rights safeguard individual freedom and protect people from abuse of power.
2. Political Rights
Political rights enable citizens to participate in the political process and governance.
Examples
Right to vote
Right to contest elections
Freedom of speech and expression
Freedom of association
Right to form political parties
Right to peaceful assembly
Importance: These rights strengthen democracy and ensure public participation in government.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
3. Economic Rights
Economic rights ensure that every individual has access to livelihood and economic security.
Examples
Right to work
Equal pay for equal work
Right to fair wages
Right to form trade unions
Right to own property (subject to law)
Right to social security
Importance: Economic rights help eliminate poverty and improve living standards.
4. Social Rights
Social rights promote human welfare and social justice.
Examples
Right to education
Right to health
Right to housing
Right to food
Right to clean drinking water
Right to family life
Importance: These rights ensure a decent standard of living and social development.
5. Cultural Rights
Cultural rights protect the traditions, language, and identity of individuals and communities.
Examples
Right to participate in cultural life
Right to preserve language
Right to practice religion
Right to protect heritage
Minority educational rights
Importance: They preserve cultural diversity and respect different traditions.
6. Collective or Solidarity Rights (Third Generation Rights)
These rights belong to groups or peoples rather than individuals.
Examples
Right to development
Right to peace
Right to a healthy environment
Right to self-determination
Right to humanitarian assistance
Importance: These rights promote international cooperation and sustainable development.
7. Environmental Rights
Environmental rights recognize that every person has the right to live in a healthy and pollution
free environment.
Examples
Right to clean air
Right to clean water
Protection of forests
Conservation of biodiversity
Protection against pollution
Importance: A healthy environment is essential for the enjoyment of all other human rights.
8. Digital Rights
Right to Privacy: Right to protection of personal data and privacy.
Right to Freedom of Expression Online: Right to express opinions and ideas online.
Right to Access to Information: Right to access information and knowledge online.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Classification by Generations of Human Rights
Conclusion
Human rights are the foundation of a just, democratic, and civilized society. They ensure that every
individual can live with dignity, freedom, equality, and security. The Constitution of India, the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), and international human rights treaties collectively
guarantee and protect these rights. Respecting and protecting human rights is essential for
achieving justice, peace, sustainable development, and the welfare of all humanity.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
4. SOURCES OF LAW
Introduction
International human rights are the rights and freedoms that belong to every individual by virtue of
being human. These rights are protected through international laws, treaties, customs, and
principles recognized by the international community. The sources of international human rights
are mainly derived from international law and are essential for ensuring dignity, equality, liberty,
and justice across the world.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Conclusion
The sources of international human rights include treaties, customary international law, general
principles of law, judicial decisions, scholarly writings, declarations, and regional instruments.
Together, these sources create a comprehensive framework for the protection and promotion of
human dignity and fundamental freedoms throughout the world. International human rights law
continues to evolve in response to global challenges and changing societal needs
2. Article 13(1)(b)
The General Assembly shall:
Initiate studies.
Make recommendations.
Promote international cooperation in social, cultural, educational, and health fields.
Assist in the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Importance: Empowers the General Assembly to develop international human rights standards.
3. Article 55
The United Nations shall promote:
Higher standards of living.
Full employment.
Economic and social progress.
Solutions to international economic, social, health, and cultural problems.
Universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms without
discrimination.
Importance: Links peace with economic development and human rights.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
4. Article 56
All Member States pledge themselves:
To take joint and separate action.
In cooperation with the United Nations.
To achieve the purposes mentioned in Article 55.
Importance: Creates a legal obligation on member states to cooperate in promoting human rights.
5. Article 62(2)
The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) may:
Make recommendations.
Promote respect for human rights.
Encourage observance of fundamental freedoms.
Importance: Gives ECOSOC authority to formulate human rights policies.
6. Article 68
ECOSOC shall establish commissions for:
Economic matters.
Social matters.
Promotion of human rights.
Importance: Led to the establishment of the Commission on Human Rights, which later evolved into
the Human Rights Council.
7. Article 76(c)
The Trusteeship System shall promote:
Respect for human rights.
Fundamental freedoms.
Equal treatment without discrimination.
Importance: Ensures protection of people living in Trust Territories.
8. Article 103
Where obligations under the UN Charter conflict with obligations under other international
agreements, the Charter prevails.
Importance: Gives priority to Charter obligations, including commitments relating to human rights.
7. Peacekeeping Operations
UN peacekeeping missions protect civilians during armed conflicts.
They monitor ceasefires, prevent violence, and support the rule of law and human rights.
8. Protection of Vulnerable Groups
The UN works to safeguard the rights of:
Women
Children
Refugees
Persons with disabilities
Indigenous peoples
Minorities
Older persons
9. Humanitarian Assistance
Through agencies such as UNICEF, UNHCR, WHO, and the World Food Programme (WFP), the UN
provides food, healthcare, education, and emergency relief during disasters and conflicts.
Principal Organs of the United Nations and Their Role in Human Rights
1. General Assembly
The General Assembly is the main deliberative and policymaking organ of the UN, consisting of all
Member States.
2. Security Council
The Security Council is responsible for maintaining international peace and security.
3. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) coordinates the economic, social, cultural,
educational, and health activities of the UN.
4. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The International Court of Justice, located at The Hague, is the principal judicial organ of the UN.
5. Secretariat
The Secretariat is headed by the Secretary-General and carries out the day today work of the UN.
6. Trusteeship Council
The Trusteeship Council supervised Trust Territories placed under the UN after the Second World
War.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Other Important UN Human Rights Bodies
Limitations
Case laws
1. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain)
Court: International Court of Justice
Principle: The ICJ recognized that the protection of basic human rights gives rise to obligations
(owed to the international community as a whole).
Human rights are not merely matters between individual states but concern all nations.
Relevance: Supports the UN Charter's objective of promoting universal respect for human rights
under Articles 1(3), 55, and 56.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is the first comprehensive international
document that recognizes the fundamental rights and freedoms of all human beings. It was adopted
by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948 in Paris after the atrocities of the
Second World War. It laid the foundation for the modern international human rights system.
The UDHR is not a legally binding treaty, but it has become part of customary international law
and has inspired many constitutions, national laws, and international human rights treaties.
Definition
According to the United Nations:
"The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a common standard of achievement for all peoples
and all nations, setting out the fundamental human rights to be universally protected."
Background
1939–1945: Second World War witnessed massive human rights violations.
1945: Formation of the United Nations through the UN Charter.
1946: The United Nations Commission on Human Rights was established to draft an international
bill of rights.
The drafting committee was chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt.
10 December 1948: The UDHR was adopted by the UN General Assembly through Resolution 217
A (III).
58 Member States of the UN in 1948.
Voting:
48 countries voted in favour.
0 against.
8 abstained.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Structure of the UDHR
Preamble & 4 Parts 30 Articles
Preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
Human right are inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights.
human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear.
human rights should be protected by the rule of law.
to promote the development of friendly relations between nations.
the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the
human person.
Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations.
Common understanding of realising the pledge
The Articles are generally divided into different categories of rights.
Important Rights mentioned Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
1) Right to Equality– is considered the most important right as it helps to create a balanced
society, a society where every individual is treated equally and it also enlarges the scope of unity
among its members. There are different articles under UDHR which deals with equality, for example
Article 1 of the UDHR provides that all the human beings are born free and are equal in dignity and
rights, Article 7 deals with equality before law and equal protection against any discrimination,
Article 10 provides that every individual have equal opportunity for a fair and free public hearing by
an independent and impartial tribunal
2) Right to Freedom– Article 13(1), Article 19, Article 20(1), and Article 23(4) of the UDHR protects
rights like freedom of movement, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of peaceful assembly,
freedom to form association and union, respectively. In Union Of India vs. Association For
Democratic Reforms And Another, the Supreme Court held that ―article 19 of universal declaration of
human rights, 1948 (UDHR) recognizes right to receive information, ―everyone has right to freedom
of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to
seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any area and regardless of frontiers.‖ There
is no gainsaying that without participation of citizens, democracy is ineffective. To enable citizens to
actively participate in governance information should be made available‖.
3) Right to life and liberty– UDHR states that every individual have the right to life and liberty.
These rights are provided since the very birth of an individual and these rights are inalienable.
4) Protection from Slavery or Slave trade– slavery and slave trade was a major issue. The
Universal of Abolition of the Slave Trade in 1815 was the first to voice this issue and since then 300
agreements were formulated to abolish slavery. In the 19th century both England and USA had
already passed legislation to outlaw slave trade. In UDHR Article 4 clearly specifies ―No one shall be
held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms‖. Also
Article 5 of UDHR protects from ill treatment, torture or cruelty or kind of punishment.
5) Freedom of Conscience and Religion– religion is considered one of the most sensitive topics,
and UDHR quite rightly has recognized that every individual has the freedom to practice any
religion of their own choice, Article 18 states that ―Everyone has the right to freedom of thought,
conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom,
either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief
in teaching, practice, worship and observance‖
6) Remedy for enforcement of right– Article 8 of UDHR seeks that every individual has the right
to get an effective remedy by the competent tribunal. In Uppalapati Nirupa Rani Another vs. Koganti
Lakshmi, and Others, 2010 the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that, ―Article 8 of UDHR and
Articles 3(a), 3(c) of ICCPR, Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution read with Section 154 CrPC make it
clear that, if a cognizable offence is not registered and investigated, it would result in violation of
human rights‖
Country like Saudi Arabia abstained from the vote on the declaration, arguing that Articles 16 and
18 (the rights for men and women to marry who they choose, and the right to freedom of religion)
were in opposition to Islamic faith and teachings which emphasis patriarchal authority
UDHR does try to maintain peace and equality in the society but we can‘t deny that the society
consists of different individual with different mind-sets, so sometimes it becomes difficult to be on
the same page.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Importance of the UDHR
1. First universal statement of human rights.
2. Foundation of international human rights law.
3. Inspired many national constitutions, including the Fundamental Rights (Part III) of the
Constitution of India.
4. Led to important international treaties such as:
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966)
5. Serves as a moral and legal standard for governments worldwide.
6. Promotes equality, justice, and human dignity.
Relevance to India
The Fundamental Rights (Articles 12–35) and the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) reflect
the ideals of the UDHR.
Indian courts frequently refer to the UDHR while interpreting constitutional rights.
India supported the adoption of the UDHR in 1948 and remains committed to its principles.
Conclusion
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is regarded as the Magna Carta of modern human
rights. Although it is not legally enforceable, it has profoundly influenced international law,
national constitutions, judicial decisions, and global human rights movements. It remains the
cornerstone of the international human rights framework and continues to guide nations in
protecting the dignity, freedom, equality, and rights of every individual.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
7. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Introduction
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is one of the most important
international human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations. It guarantees fundamental civil
and political rights to every individual and obligates State Parties to respect, protect, and ensure
these rights without discrimination.
The ICCPR, together with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), forms the International Bill of Human
Rights.
Definition
The ICCPR is an international treaty adopted by the United Nations that recognizes and protects
the civil and political rights of individuals and requires States to ensure these rights through
legislative and judicial measures.
History
10 December 1948 – Adoption of the UDHR.
16 December 1966 – ICCPR adopted by the UN General Assembly through Resolution 2200A
(XXI).
23 March 1976 – ICCPR entered into force.
Signatory States: 74
States Parties (ratified or acceded): 174 (current)
Optional Protocol (First): 116 States Parties
Second Optional Protocol (aiming at abolition of the death penalty): 93 States Parties
India and the ICCPR
Signed: 10 April 1979
Ratified (became a State Party): 10 April 1979
Objectives of ICCPR
1. To protect civil and political rights of every individual.
2. To ensure equality before the law.
3. To prevent arbitrary actions by governments.
4. To promote democracy, justice, and the rule of law.
5. To protect human dignity and individual freedom.
6. To provide effective remedies for human rights violations.
7. To eliminate discrimination.
8. To strengthen international cooperation in protecting human rights.
Purpose of ICCPR
* The ICCPR recognizes the inherent dignity of each individual and undertakes to promote
conditions within states to allow the enjoyment of civil and political rights.
• Countries that have ratified the Covenant are obligated to protect and preserve basic human right
and compelled to take administrative, judicial, and legislative measures in order to protect the
rights enshrined in the treaty and to provide an effective remedy."
• There are currently 74 signatories and 168 parties to the ICCPR.
• The covenant contains six parts with 53 articles.
Important Features
Legally binding treaty.
Applies to all persons within a State's jurisdiction.
Rights must be guaranteed without discrimination.
Certain rights are nonderogable even during emergencies.
Establishes the Human Rights Committee to monitor implementation.
Requires State Parties to submit periodic reports.
Individuals may submit complaints under the First Optional Protocol (for States that have
accepted it).
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Structure of the ICCPR
6 Parts 53 Articles
Main provisions
Article 1– provides that the states that the right to self-determination is universal and calls upon
States to promote the realization of that right and to respect it.
Article 2– each state party must respect and ensure that the rights provided under this covenant is
enforced and the rights are provided to each and every individual of the state irrespective of their
race, gender, caste, sex, language, religion, political or other opinions. The article further provides
that every individual whose rights are violated should be provided with a suitable remedy.
Optional Protocols
First Optional Protocol (1966)
Allows individuals to submit complaints to the Human Rights Committee after exhausting
domestic remedies.
Second Optional Protocol (1989)
Aims at the abolition of the death penalty.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Criticism
Weak enforcement mechanism.
Depends largely on State cooperation.
Some countries enter reservations limiting obligations.
Human Rights Committee decisions are not directly enforceable.
Political considerations sometimes affect implementation.
Case Laws
1. Toonen v. Australia (1994)
Facts: Tasmanian laws criminalized consensual same sex relations.
Held: The Human Rights Committee held that such laws violated Articles 17 (privacy) and 26
(equality) of the ICCPR.
Principle: Privacy includes protection of consensual adult relationships.
Conclusion
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a landmark treaty that
guarantees fundamental civil and political freedoms such as the right to life, liberty, equality,
freedom of expression, religion, privacy, and fair trial. It imposes binding obligations on States to
respect and protect these rights and has significantly influenced constitutional jurisprudence,
including in India. Despite enforcement challenges, the ICCPR remains one of the most important
international instruments for the protection of human rights worldwide.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
8. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(ICESCR)
Introduction
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) is one of the core
international human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations. It recognizes that every person
is entitled to economic, social, and cultural rights necessary for living with dignity. Along with the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), it forms the International Bill of Human Rights.
Definition
The ICESCR is an international treaty adopted by the United Nations that obligates State Parties to
progressively realize economic, social, and cultural rights, such as the rights to work, education,
health, social security, and an adequate standard of living.
History
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) was adopted by the
United Nations General Assembly on 16 December 1966. It entered into force on 3 January 1976.
As of 2026, the ICESCR has 171 States Parties, meaning 171 countries have ratified or acceded to
the Covenant and are legally bound by its provisions.
India ratified the ICESCR on 10 April 1979.
Objectives of ICESCR
1. To ensure an adequate standard of living for all.
2. To promote social justice and equality.
3. To protect workers' rights.
4. To guarantee access to education and healthcare.
5. To eliminate discrimination in the enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights.
6. To promote cultural development and scientific progress.
7. To improve living conditions and human dignity.
Salient Features
A legally binding international treaty.
Requires progressive realization of rights using the maximum available resources.
Applies without discrimination.
Requires periodic reports by States.
Supervised by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR).
Recognizes both individual and collective rights.
5 Parts 31 Articles
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Article 3 – Equality of Men and Women
Equal rights for men and women in enjoying all rights under ICESCR.
Article 4 – Limitations
Rights may be limited only by law and for public welfare.
Article 5 – Protection against Misuse
No state or person can destroy or restrict the rights recognized in the Covenant.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Importance of ICESCR
Promotes social justice and human dignity.
Protects workers' rights and labour welfare.
Supports universal education and healthcare.
Reduces poverty and inequality.
Encourages sustainable development.
Protects vulnerable and marginalized groups.
Strengthens welfare state principles.
Significance of ICESCR
1. Protects basic human dignity.
2. Promotes social justice and equality.
3. Recognizes rights related to work, health, education, and culture.
4. Guides welfare policies of states.
5. Helps reduce poverty and discrimination.
Criticism of ICESCR
1. Rights are not immediately enforceable.
2. Implementation depends on economic capacity of states.
3. Weak enforcement mechanism.
4. Many developing countries face resource limitations.
Case Laws
1. People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Held: The Supreme Court held that the right to food is part of the right to life under Article 21 of the
Constitution. The Court directed effective implementation of food security schemes, reflecting
ICESCR principles on the right to an adequate standard of living.
Conclusion
The ICESCR is a landmark international human rights treaty that guarantees economic, social, and
cultural rights essential for human dignity and development. It places obligations on states to
progressively ensure rights such as work, education, health, social security, and cultural
participation. Despite challenges in implementation, the Covenant remains a major instrument for
promoting global social justice and human welfare.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
9. European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), 1950
Introduction
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a regional human rights treaty adopted by
the Council of Europe on 4 November 1950 at Rome, Italy. It entered into force on 3 September
1953. The Convention protects the civil and political rights of individuals and established the
European Court of Human Rights to enforce these rights.
Adopted: 4 November 1950
Entered into Force: 3 September 1953
Depository: Council of Europe
Monitoring Body: European Court of Human Rights
Purpose: Protection and enforcement of fundamental human rights and freedoms in Europe.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
6. No Punishment without Law (Article 7)
No one may be convicted for an act that was not a criminal offence at the time it was committed.
Prohibits retrospective criminal laws.
ECHR has established several enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with its
provisions, including:
• European Court of Human Rights: The Court has the power to interpret the Convention and its
protocols, and to decide cases brought by individuals or states.
• Committee of Ministers: The Committee is responsible for supervising the execution of judgments
of the European Court of Human Rights.
Important Protocols
Protocol No. 1: Protection of Property, Right to Education, Right to Free Elections.
Protocol No. 4: Freedom of Movement and Prohibition of Imprisonment for Debt.
Protocol No. 6: Abolition of the Death Penalty in Peacetime.
Protocol No. 7: Right of Appeal in Criminal Matters, Compensation for Miscarriage of Justice,
Equality of Spouses.
Protocol No. 12: Right against expulsion and right to appeal.
Protocol No. 13: Complete Abolition of the Death Penalty.
Salient Features
Regional human rights treaty applicable to Council of Europe member States.
Legally binding on all State Parties.
Individuals can directly approach the European Court of Human Rights after exhausting
domestic remedies.
Guarantees enforceable civil and political rights.
Judgments of the European Court are binding on member States.
Strengthens democracy, rule of law, and protection of human dignity.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Case Laws
Sttk ry and tehyry v. Finland (2001),
the Committee found that health sector Workers in Finland had been exposed to radiation at the
workplace, and held that this violated Article 24, which requires states parties "to eliminate risks in
inherently dangerous or unhealthy occupations.
Brogan v. United kingdom
The Prevention of Terrorism Act (1984) authorized arrest without warrant of a person who is
suspected to be involved with "acts of terrorism" in Northern Ireland; provided for detention after
arrest for not over 48 hours, except if the Secretary of State extends this period to not more than 5
days
The applicants: neither charged nor brought before a court during their detention, damages,
(administrative detention for the purpose of gathering information)
• The Court: the need for a proper balance between the defence of the institutions of democracy
and the protection of human rights
• Conclusion: detention of suspected terrorists for 6 days and 14 hours and 4 days and 6 hours
respectively was justified by the public emergency.
Osman v. United Kingdom – Established the State's positive obligation to protect the right to life.
Conclusion
The European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 is one of the most successful regional human
rights instruments. It provides effective judicial protection of civil and political rights through the
European Court of Human Rights and has significantly influenced constitutional and international
human rights law across Europe and beyond. This format is suitable for a 20mark LL.B
examination answer, similar in style to an ICCPR answer.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
9A. European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Introduction
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the judicial organ established under Article 19 of
the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), 1950. It ensures that the rights and freedoms
guaranteed by the Convention are observed by all State Parties. The Court is headquartered in
Strasbourg.
Establishment
Established under: Article 19 of the ECHR.
Location: Strasbourg.
Operational since: 1959.
Permanent fulltime Court: Since 1998, following Protocol No. 11.
Jurisdiction: Hears complaints against States that have ratified the ECHR.
3. Election of Judges
Judges are elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE).
Each State submits a list of three qualified candidates, and one is elected.
4. Term of Office
Judges serve a single non-renewable term of nine years.
They cannot be removed except by a decision of the Court if they no longer fulfill the required
conditions.
5. Independence
Judges serve in their individual capacity, not as representatives of their countries.
They must remain impartial and independent throughout their tenure.
Internal Structure of the Court
The Court functions through different judicial formations:
1. Single Judge
Decides clearly inadmissible applications.
Can reject applications that do not satisfy the admissibility criteria.
2. Committee (3 Judges)
Consists of three judges.
Decides repetitive cases where established case law already exists.
May declare applications admissible and deliver judgments.
3. Chamber (7 Judges)
Consists of seven judges.
Hears most applications on admissibility and merits.
Delivers judgments in ordinary cases.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
President and Vice Presidents
The Court elects from among its judges:
President of the Court
Vice Presidents
Section Presidents
2. Interstate Applications
One State Party may bring a complaint against another State Party for alleged violations of the
Convention.
3. Advisory Opinions
The Court may provide advisory opinions on legal questions concerning the interpretation of the
Convention, where permitted by the relevant Protocol.
3. Settlement of Disputes
Resolves disputes between individuals and States, and between States.
7. Ensuring Compliance
Judgments are binding on the respondent State. Their execution is supervised by the Committee of
Ministers of the Council of Europe.
8. Promotion of Rule of Law
Strengthens democracy, accountability, and respect for fundamental freedoms across Europe.
Conclusion
The European Court of Human Rights is the cornerstone of the European human rights protection
system. Through its independent judges, binding judgments, and accessible complaint mechanism,
it ensures that the rights guaranteed under the ECHR are effectively protected. Its jurisprudence
has become one of the most influential sources of international human rights law and is frequently
cited in constitutional and comparative legal studies.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
10. American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), 1969 (Pact of San
José)
Introduction
The American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), also known as the Pact of San José, Costa
Rica, is the principal regional human rights treaty of the Americas. It was adopted under the
auspices of the Organization of American States to protect civil and political rights and to establish
a regional system for the enforcement of human rights.
Adopted: 22 November 1969
Place of Adoption: San José
Entered into Force: 18 July 1978
Depository: Organization of American States
Also Known As: Pact of San José, Costa Rica
Preamble
To consolidate in this hemisphere within the framework of democratic institution, a system of
personal liberty, and social Justice based on respect of men
Objectives
1. To protect and promote fundamental human rights in the Americas.
2. To ensure respect for civil and political rights.
3. To provide effective remedies for victims of human rights violations.
4. To establish regional human rights institutions.
5. To strengthen democracy, justice, and the rule of law.
Chapter III (Articles 26) Progressive development of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
Other Rights:
• Right to a Nationality (Article 20): Protection of the right to a nationality.
• Right to Property (Article 21): Protection of the right to property.
• Right to Equal Protection (Article 24): Protection against discrimination and equal protection
under the law.
Salient Features
Regional human rights treaty for the Americas.
Legally binding on States that ratify it.
Protects civil and political rights.
Recognizes progressive realization of economic, social, and cultural rights.
Establishes the Inter-American Commission and Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Allows individuals to seek international protection after exhausting domestic remedies.
Promotes democracy, human dignity, equality, and justice.
Enforcement Mechanism
The Convention is enforced through two institutions:
1. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Receives petitions from individuals.
Investigates alleged human rights violations.
Attempts friendly settlement.
Refers serious cases to the Inter-American Court.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Case Laws
Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) AwasTingni Community V. Nicaragua (August 31, 2001)
Court finally ordered the government to demarcate the land, recognizing the community is
ancestral and historical title to it, and to establish legal procedures for the demarcation and titling
of the traditional lands of all indigenous communities in Nicargua.
Case of Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic (August 28, 2014)
The Commission submitted to the Court this case against the State of the Dominican Republic.
This case related to the arbitrary detention and summary expulsion by the Dominican Republic
within its territory, of the victims who were Haitians and Dominicans of Haitian descent, including
children. Among other things, the IACHR unanimously held that "the State violated the rights to
recognition of juridical personality, the right to protection of the family recognized in Article 17 of
the Convention."
Conclusion
The American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 is one of the most important regional human
rights treaties. Through the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American
Court of Human Rights, it provides an effective mechanism for protecting human rights and
ensuring that States are accountable for violations. It is a landmark instrument for the promotion
of justice, democracy, and the rule of law in the Americas.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
10A. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Part II – Chapter VI (Articles 34–51)
Introduction
The American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), 1969 establish the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). The Commission is the principal organ responsible for
promoting and protecting human rights in the member States of the Organization of American
States (OAS).
4. Organisation
The Commission elects from among its members:
President
First Vice-President
Second Vice-President
It also adopts its own Rules of Procedure.
2. Make Recommendations
Recommends legislative and administrative measures to member States.
4. Request Information
Requests information from governments regarding human rights issues.
5. Respond to Petitions
Receives and processes complaints from individuals, groups, and NGOs.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
6. Conduct Investigations
Investigates alleged violations through hearings, factfinding missions, and collection of evidence.
7. Friendly Settlement
Facilitates amicable settlement between the parties whenever possible.
2. Recommend Reforms
Suggest changes in laws and policies to improve human rights protection.
3. Precautionary Measures
Request urgent measures to prevent irreparable harm.
4. Monitoring Powers
Monitor compliance with human rights obligations by States.
5. Settlement Powers
Promote friendly settlement between victims and States.
6. Referral Powers
Refer appropriate cases to the Inter-American Court.
Article 46 – Admissibility
A petition is admissible if:
Domestic remedies have been exhausted.
It is filed within the prescribed time.
It is not pending before another international body.
Article 47 – Inadmissibility
A petition is rejected if:
It does not satisfy admissibility requirements.
It is manifestly unfounded.
It is substantially the same as a matter already examined.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Article 48 – Examination
The Commission investigates the complaint, seeks observations from the State, and may hold
hearings.
Article 50 – Report
If no settlement is reached, the Commission prepares a report containing its findings and
recommendations.
Conclusion
Articles 34–51 of the American Convention on Human Rights establish the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights, define its organisation, composition, powers, and functions, and lay
down the procedure for handling human rights complaints. The Commission serves as the first and
most important regional mechanism for the protection and promotion of human rights in the
Americas. This makes it a vital institution within the Inter-American human rights system.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
10B. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Part II – Chapter VII (Articles 52–73)
Introduction
the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), 1969 establish the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights (IACtHR). The Court is the judicial organ of the Inter-American human rights system
and ensures the interpretation and application of the Convention. It is headquartered in San José.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Powers of the Court
1. Interpret the Convention
Provides authoritative interpretation of the ACHR.
6. Supervise Compliance
Monitors whether States implement its judgments.
2. Settle Disputes
Resolves disputes between States and victims regarding Convention violations.
3. Interpret the Convention
Clarifies the scope and meaning of Convention provisions.
Case of Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic (August 28, 2014)
The Commission submitted to the Court this case against the State of the Dominican Republic.
This case related to the arbitrary detention and summary expulsion by the Dominican Republic
within its territory, of the victims who were Haitians and Dominicans of Haitian descent, including
children. Among other things, the IACHR unanimously held that "the State violated the rights to
recognition of juridical personality, the right to protection of the family recognized in Article 17 of
the Convention."
Conclusion
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, established under Articles 52–73 of the American
Convention on Human Rights, is the highest judicial authority for human rights protection in the
Americas. Through its independent judges, binding judgments, advisory opinions, reparations, and
supervision of compliance, the Court ensures effective enforcement of the Convention and plays a
vital role in strengthening democracy, justice, and the rule of law in the region.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
11. African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR)
Introduction
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR), also known as the Banjul Charter, is
the principal regional human rights instrument of Africa. It was adopted by the Organization of
African Unity (OAU), now the African Union, to promote and protect human rights across the
African continent.
Adopted: 27 June 1981, Banjul, The Gambia
Came into force: 21 October 1986
Administered by: African Union
Objective: To promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms while
recognizing both individual rights and collective (peoples') rights.
Preamble
Emphasises important of freedom, equality, justice, and dignity for achievement of legitimate
aspiration of African people, eradicate colonialism, promote better lives and foster international Co-
operation.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Right to work
Right to health
Right to education
Protection of family
Right to property
Right to cultural development
Peoples' Rights
Right to self-determination
Right to development
Right to peace and security
Right to a satisfactory environment
Right to freely dispose of natural resources
Salient Features
Applies to all African Union Member States that have ratified it.
Recognizes both individual rights and peoples' rights.
Imposes duties on individuals towards society and the State.
Establishes the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.
Led to the establishment of the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights through a later
protocol.
Prohibits discrimination on grounds such as race, ethnicity, colour, sex, language, religion,
political opinion, national or social origin, fortune, birth, or other status.
Enforcement Mechanism
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
Importance of the Charter
First comprehensive African human rights treaty.
Recognizes collective rights (Peoples' Rights).
Balances rights with duties.
Protects civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights in one instrument.
Strengthens democracy, peace, and the rule of law in Africa.
Serves as the foundation of the African regional human rights system.
Criticism
Weak enforcement mechanisms.
Dependence on State cooperation.
Delays in implementation.
Some States fail to comply with decisions.
Limited access of individuals to the African Court.
Conclusion
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, 1981 is a landmark regional human rights
treaty that uniquely combines individual rights, peoples' rights, and individual duties. It forms the
cornerstone of the African human rights protection system and has significantly influenced the
promotion of democracy, justice, and human dignity throughout Africa. Despite enforcement
challenges, it remains one of the most important regional human rights instruments in
international law.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
11A. African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
Introduction
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights is the judicial organ established by the 1998
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. It complements the work of the
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights by ensuring the protection of human and
peoples' rights in Africa.
Protocol Adopted: 9 June 1998
Protocol Entered into Force: 25 January 2004
Court Established: 2004
Headquarters: Arusha
1. Composition
The Court consists of 11 judges elected from among nationals of the Member States of the African
Union.
2. Qualifications
Judges must:
Be persons of high moral character.
Possess recognized competence in human rights, international law, or judicial experience.
Be independent and impartial.
3. Election of Judges
Judges are elected by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the African Union.
Only one judge may be elected from each Member State.
4. Term of Office
Judges serve for six years.
They may be reelected once.
The President serves fulltime, while the other judges generally serve on a parttime basis
unless required.
5. Officers
The Court elects:
President
VicePresident
6. Registry
The Court has a Registry, headed by a Registrar, which:
Maintains records.
Registers applications.
Organizes hearings.
Provides administrative and legal assistance.
1. Contentious Jurisdiction
The Court hears disputes concerning:
The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
The 1998 Protocol.
Other human rights treaties ratified by the States concerned.
2. Advisory Jurisdiction
The Court may give advisory opinions on legal questions relating to:
The African Charter.
Other human rights instruments.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
3. Personal Jurisdiction
Cases may be brought by:
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.
States Parties.
African intergovernmental organizations.
Individuals and NGOs only where the respondent State has made a declaration accepting
such direct access.
3. Settlement of Disputes
Resolves disputes between States and victims concerning human rights violations.
4. Judicial Enforcement
Ensures effective enforcement of human rights obligations.
7. Advisory Function
Provides advisory opinions to African Union institutions and Member States.
Step 2 – Registration
The Registry registers the application.
Step 6 – Judgment
The Court delivers a reasoned judgment.
Step 7 – Enforcement
The respondent State must comply with the judgment, and the African Union Executive Council
monitors implementation.
1. Declaration of Violation
Declares that the State has violated the Charter.
2. Compensation
Awards monetary compensation to victims.
3. Restitution
Orders restoration of rights or property.
4. Rehabilitation
Orders medical, psychological, or social rehabilitation.
5. Satisfaction
Requires public apologies or acknowledgment of wrongdoing.
6. Guarantees of Non-Repetition
Orders legislative, administrative, or institutional reforms to prevent future violations.
7. Provisional Measures
Orders urgent temporary measures to protect victims from irreparable harm while the case is
pending.
Tanganyika Law Society and The Legal and Human Rights Centre v. Tanzania
The Court held that restrictions preventing independent candidates from contesting elections
violated the African Charter.
Salient Features
Independent regional human rights court.
11 judges elected by the African Union.
Located in Arusha, Tanzania.
Binding judgments on States Parties.
Advisory and contentious jurisdiction.
Can award compensation and other reparations.
Complements the work of the African Commission.
Conclusion
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights is the highest regional judicial body for human
rights protection in Africa. Through its 11 independent judges, binding judgments, advisory
opinions, and wide remedial powers, it ensures effective implementation of the African Charter on
Human and Peoples' Rights. Together with the African Commission, it forms the cornerstone of the
African regional human rights protection system.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
11B. African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR)
Introduction
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights is the principal body established under
Part II (Articles 30–63) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, 1981 (Banjul Charter).
The Commission was created to promote and protect human and peoples' rights throughout Africa.
Established under: Articles 30–63 of the African Charter.
Established: 1987.
Headquarters: Banjul.
1. Composition
The Commission consists of 11 Commissioners.
2. Qualifications
The Commissioners must:
Be persons of high moral character.
Possess integrity, impartiality, and competence in human and peoples' rights.
Have recognized experience in law, human rights, or related fields.
3. Election
Commissioners are elected by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the African
Union.
4. Term of Office
Commissioners serve for six years.
They are eligible for re-election.
5. Officers
The Commission elects:
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
6. Secretariat
The Commission is assisted by a Secretariat, headed by a Secretary, which:
Registers communications.
Organizes meetings.
Maintains records.
Assists in investigations.
Provides administrative and legal support.
Jurisdiction
The Commission has the following jurisdiction:
1. Promotional Jurisdiction
Promotes awareness of human rights through:
Education.
Research.
Publications.
Seminars and conferences.
2. Protective Jurisdiction
Examines complaints alleging violations of the African Charter.
3. Interpretative Jurisdiction
Interprets the provisions of the African Charter when requested by:
African Union institutions.
Member States.
African organizations recognized by the African Union.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
4. Advisory Jurisdiction
Provides opinions and recommendations on human rights issues.
3. Investigation
Investigates complaints and conducts country missions.
4. Interpretation
Interprets the African Charter whenever requested.
5. Settlement of Disputes
Attempts to resolve disputes through negotiation and friendly settlement.
6. Recommendations
Makes recommendations to governments for improving human rights protection.
7. Cooperation
Cooperates with governments, NGOs, and international organizations.
8. Annual Reports
Submits annual reports to the African Union Assembly.
Step 2 – Registration
The Secretariat registers the communication.
Step 3 – Admissibility
The Commission examines whether:
Domestic remedies have been exhausted.
The communication is not anonymous.
The complaint is compatible with the Charter.
Step 4 – Investigation
The Commission:
Collects evidence.
Requests information.
Conducts hearings if necessary.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Step 5 – Friendly Settlement
The Commission attempts to settle the dispute amicably.
Step 6 – Decision and Recommendations
If settlement fails, the Commission issues findings and recommendations.
Step 7 – Referral to the Court
Where appropriate, the Commission may refer the matter to the African Court on Human and
Peoples' Rights.
Remedies
When a violation is established, the Commission may recommend:
1. Declaration of Violation
Declares that the State has violated the African Charter.
2. Compensation
Recommends payment of compensation to victims.
3. Restitution
Recommends restoration of rights or property.
4. Rehabilitation
Recommends medical, psychological, or social rehabilitation.
5. Legislative Reform
Recommends amendment or repeal of laws inconsistent with the Charter.
6. Administrative Measures
Recommends changes in government policies or practices.
7. Guarantees of Non-Repetition
Recommends measures to prevent future violations.
1. Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social
Rights v. Nigeria
The Commission held Nigeria responsible for violating the rights to health, property, housing, and a
satisfactory environment of the Ogoni people.
The Commission found violations of the rights to liberty, security, and freedom from torture and
recommended compensation and legal reforms.
Salient Features
Composed of 11 Commissioners.
Headquarters in Banjul, The Gambia.
Promotes, protects, and interprets the African Charter.
Receives individual, NGO, and State communications.
Conducts investigations and fact finding missions.
Makes recommendations and refers cases to the African Court.
Strengthens human rights protection across Africa.
Conclusion
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights is the primary quasi-judicial body
established under the African Charter to promote, protect, and interpret human rights in Africa.
Through its 11 Commissioners, investigative powers, promotional activities, complaint procedures,
and recommendations, it plays a central role in safeguarding human and peoples' rights. Together
with the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights, it forms the foundation of the African
regional human rights protection system.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
12. WRITS
Introduction
Writs are constitutional remedies designed to look after the violation of fundamental rights
enshrined in part III of the constitution. It is a written order in the forms mentioned in the
constitution. It is an order to do a particular thing or stop from doing it. It can be issued by the
Supreme Court under Article 32 and under 226 by the High Court. These are the remedies
entrusted by the constitution for the enforcement of fundamental rights. It can be in the form of
orders, warrants, directions, summons, etc. The aggrieved person applies for issuance of a writ
through presenting a writ petition before the competent authority. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar remarked
Article 32 as the heart and soul of the constitution.
Types of Writs
1. Habeas Corpus
2. Mandamus
3. Certiorari
4. Quo Warranto
5. Prohibition
Habeas Corpus
The literal meaning of Habeas Corpus is ―to have the body‖.
The objective of this writ is to remove a person from unlawful detention or custody.
The court orders that person before it to inquire into the legitimacy of the detention.
The competent court orders the release of the person in custody if it finds it arbitrary.
The cardinal principle of this writ is the right to freedom.
The writ cannot be invoked if the order to arrest the person from competent authority seems under
jurisdiction and prima facie legal.
The writ can be issued against public authorities and individuals.
The writ of Habeas Corpus can be filed by the detained person, his family or friends.
Conditions
There are three major conditions upon which this writ can be issued:
The detained person is not presented before the magistrate within 24 hours of the arrest.
The arrest was made under an unconstitutional law.
The person was arrested without any violation of the law.
Case Laws
1. In the case of Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1980), an application in the form of a letter was
filed before the apex court by a prisoner in the place of his prison inmate stating the manhandling by
the jail officials. The apex court issues the writ of Habeas Corpus upon the application which clarified
that the writ is not only available against wrongful detention but for the protection against indecent
behavior during the period of detention.
2. In the matter of ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976), it was held that Article 21 can be restricted
by the state. The case is known as the darkest judgment in history. It is also known as the habeas
corpus case
Mandamus
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Exceptions
Non-statutory departmental functions
It cannot be invoked in matters where the duty is discretionary
Against right of private nature
It the direction will be in contravention with the law
In the matter of an alternative remedy available
Case Laws
1. In the case of Union of India v. S.B. Vohraxi (2004), the Supreme Court upheld the exceptions denying
the presenting of writ of mandamus on the exempted ground.
2. In the case of Suganmal v. State of M.P (1965), the apex court clarified that if an alternative legal
remedy is available writ of mandamus cannot be invoked.
Certiorari
It stands for ―to certify‖
The writ can be issued when the court finds the decision of the lower court erroneous or beyond its
authority.
It is used as curative writ petition
The court has the authority to take charge of the case by transferring it before itself or quashing the
verdict of another inferior court.
Before 1991 the writ was only allowed to be issued against the judicial authority or quasi-judicial
authority and not the administrative authority but post 1991 1it can be issued against the
administrative authority as well.
It cannot be issued against private people.
Grounds
When the inferior court lacked jurisdiction while giving a judgment
When the inferior court performed beyond their jurisdiction
When the inferior court acts against the procedural law
When principle of natural justice is not performed by the court
Procedure
Filing of petition in the court by an advocate
The petition must include all the required information related to the accused
Notice is sent to the opposite party
Court passes the judgment in the format of writ after hearing both parties
Case Laws
1. In the case of Yekoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan (1965) the court stated that this writ cannot be invoked
for appeal.
2. In the matter of Radhey Shyam and anr. v. Chhabi Nath and Ors. (2015) the court said that power
under Article 227 cannot be used for writ filed under Article 226.
Quo warranto
Grounds
A person has held a public office without authority.
The person is unqualified under the Constitution of India to hold the office.
Permanent term
It must be a public office
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Case Laws
1. The writ of Quo warranto can be invoked against private office was held in the case of Amarendra
Chandra v. Narendra Kumar Basu, (1951). The same ratio was decided in the case of Jamalpur Arya
Samaj Sabha v. Dr D Rama (AIR 1954).
2. It was held in the case of University of Mysore v. CD Govinda Rao, (1963), that the public office must be
of a statutory nature to issue the writ of Quo warranto.
Prohibition
Conditions
Application of power beyond the jurisdiction
Infringement of Principles of Natural Justice
Using invalid law
Conducting in contravention of basic legal rights
Performed error based on record
Case Laws
In the case of Hari Vishnu v. Syed Ahmed Ishaque (1955) it was held by the court that this writ can be
issued only when the decision has not been given by the court.
Writ cannot be issued after the execution of the order was confirmed in the case of Prudential Capital
Markets Ltd v. The State of A.P. and others, (2000).
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
13. Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (PHRA)
Introduction
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (Act No. 10 of 1994) was enacted by the Parliament of
India to provide for the better protection and promotion of human rights. The Act came into force
on 8 January 1994. It was enacted in conformity with India's constitutional commitment and
international obligations under instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
The Act establishes the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), State Human Rights
Commissions (SHRCs), and Human Rights Courts to ensure effective protection of human rights.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Chapter II – National Human Rights Commission (Sections 3–11)
This chapter provides for the establishment, composition, appointment, tenure, resignation,
removal, staff, and procedure of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).
Chapter III – Functions and Powers of the Commission (Sections 12–16)
This chapter specifies the functions and powers of the NHRC, including inquiry into human rights
violations, intervention in court proceedings, inspection of prisons, review of safeguards, promotion
of human rights awareness, and research.
Chapter IV – Procedure for Inquiry (Sections 17–20)
This chapter lays down the procedure for conducting inquiries into complaints of human rights
violations, the powers of investigation, action on inquiry reports, and special provisions relating to
cases involving the armed forces.
Human rights mean the rights relating to life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the individual,
guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in international covenants and enforceable by courts
in India.
Appointment
The Chairperson and Members are appointed by the President of India on the recommendation of a
committee consisting of:
Prime Minister – Chairperson
Speaker of the Lok Sabha
Union Home Minister
Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha
Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha
Tenure
Three years or until attaining the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier.
Eligible for reappointment as provided under the Act.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Powers of NHRC (Section 13)
While conducting an inquiry, the NHRC has the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil
Procedure, including:
Summoning and examining witnesses
Receiving evidence on affidavits
Discovery and production of documents
Requisitioning public records
Issuing commissions for examination of witnesses
Conducting spot inspections and investigations
Procedure of Inquiry
The NHRC may:
Receive complaints from victims or any person on their behalf.
Take suo motu cognizance of violations.
Call for reports from the concerned authorities.
Conduct investigations through its own investigation division or other agencies.
Recommend compensation or disciplinary action.
Approach the Supreme Court or High Courts for appropriate directions.
Jurisdiction of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
The jurisdiction of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) refers to the scope of its
authority to inquire into and deal with matters relating to human rights under the Protection of
Human Rights Act, 1993.
1. SubjectMatter Jurisdiction
The NHRC has jurisdiction to inquire into:
Violations of human rights by a public servant.
Negligence by a public servant in preventing human rights violations.
Matters relating to the rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity guaranteed by the
Constitution or international human rights conventions enforceable in India.
2. Territorial Jurisdiction
The NHRC has jurisdiction throughout India.
It can inquire into matters concerning the Central Government, Union Territories, and
States, subject to the provisions of the Act.
Where a State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) is already inquiring into a matter, the
NHRC ordinarily does not inquire into the same matter.
Limitations of NHRC
Recommendations are advisory and not legally binding.
Cannot punish offenders directly.
Normally cannot inquire into complaints filed after one year from the date of the incident.
Limited jurisdiction over matters involving the armed forces.
Depends on government agencies for implementation of recommendations.
Importance of NHRC
Protects the fundamental rights of citizens.
Ensures accountability of public authorities.
Promotes awareness and education on human rights.
Recommends compensation and policy reforms.
Strengthens India's compliance with international human rights standards.
Conclusion
The National Human Rights Commission is India's premier statutory body for the protection and
promotion of human rights. Through its investigative, advisory, and educational functions, it plays
a vital role in safeguarding the rights to life, liberty, equality, and dignity guaranteed under the
Constitution. Although its recommendations are not binding, the NHRC has significantly
contributed to improving human rights governance in India. Strengthening its enforcement powers
and ensuring timely implementation of its recommendations would further enhance its
effectiveness.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
15. State Human Rights Commission (SHRC)
Introduction
The State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) is a statutory body established under Sections 21 to
29 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. It is constituted by the State Government to
protect and promote human rights within the State. The SHRC performs functions similar to the
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) but deals with matters relating to the State List and
Concurrent List under the Constitution.
Human rights mean the rights relating to life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the individual,
guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in international covenants and enforceable by courts
in India.
Appointment
The Chairperson and Members are appointed by the Governor of the State on the recommendation
of a committee consisting of:
Chief Minister – Chairperson
Speaker of the Legislative Assembly
Home Minister of the State
Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Assembly
(Where the State has a Legislative Council, the Chairman of the Legislative Council and the Leader
of Opposition in the Council are also members of the committee.)
Tenure
The Chairperson and Members hold office for three years or until attaining the age of 70 years,
whichever is earlier.
They are eligible for reappointment as provided under the Act.
Jurisdiction
The SHRC has jurisdiction over matters relating to:
Human rights violations by public servants within the State.
Subjects falling under the State List and Concurrent List of the Constitution.
Negligence by public servants in preventing human rights violations.
It cannot inquire into matters already pending before the National Human Rights
Commission (NHRC).
Powers of SHRC
While conducting an inquiry, the SHRC has powers similar to those of a Civil Court, including:
Summoning and examining witnesses.
Receiving evidence on affidavits.
Requiring the production of documents.
Requisitioning public records.
Issuing commissions for examination of witnesses.
Conducting investigations and inspections.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Functions of SHRC
The Commission performs the following functions:
1. Inquire into complaints of human rights violations.
2. Investigate negligence by public servants.
3. Visit prisons, detention centres, and correctional institutions.
4. Review constitutional and legal safeguards relating to human rights.
5. Recommend measures for effective implementation of human rights.
6. Promote research and education on human rights.
7. Encourage NGOs and institutions working in the field of human rights.
8. Recommend payment of compensation and disciplinary action where appropriate.
Procedure of Inquiry
The SHRC may:
Entertain complaints from victims or any person on their behalf.
Take suo motu cognizance of human rights violations.
Call for reports from the State Government or authorities.
Conduct investigations through its own investigation wing or police agencies.
Submit recommendations to the State Government.
Limitations
Recommendations of the SHRC are advisory and are not legally binding.
It cannot punish offenders directly.
It generally cannot inquire into complaints filed after one year from the date of the alleged
violation.
It cannot inquire into matters pending before the NHRC.
It has no jurisdiction over matters falling exclusively under the Union List.
Importance of SHRC
Protects the human rights of people at the State level.
Provides an accessible forum for redress of grievances.
Monitors prisons and detention centres.
Promotes awareness of constitutional and human rights.
Assists the State Government in improving human rights protection.
Conclusion
The State Human Rights Commission is an important institution established under the Protection
of Human Rights Act, 1993 to safeguard human rights at the State level. It acts as a watchdog
against violations by public authorities and promotes respect for the rights to life, liberty, equality,
and dignity. Although its recommendations are not binding, the SHRC plays a significant role in
strengthening human rights governance and ensuring accountability within the States.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
16. Human Rights and the Constitution of India
Introduction
Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms inherent to every human being, irrespective of
race, religion, sex, nationality, caste, or language. The Constitution of India, which came into force
on 26 January 1950, guarantees these rights and provides legal protection against their violation.
The Constitution reflects the ideals of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948,
and seeks to establish justice, liberty, equality, and dignity for every individual.
Definition
Under Section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993:
"Human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual
guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in international covenants and enforceable by courts
in India.
2. Religious Texts
Ancient scriptures such as the Vedas, Bhagavad Gita, Arthashastra, and Dharmashastra
emphasized justice, equality, morality, and protection of human dignity.
3. Medieval Period
Muslim rulers, especially Akbar and Jahangir, promoted justice, religious tolerance, and
protection of people's rights.
4. British Rule
During British colonial rule, Indians suffered widespread violations of civil and political rights.
These injustices led to the growth of the modern human rights movement in India.
1. Preamble
The Preamble embodies the ideals of human rights by securing:
Justice (Social, Economic and Political)
Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship
Equality of status and opportunity
Fraternity assuring dignity of the individual and unity and integrity of the nation
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
(C) Right against Exploitation (Articles 23–24)
Prohibition of human trafficking
Prohibition of forced labour
Prohibition of child labour in hazardous industries
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Landmark Case Laws
Conclusion
The Constitution of India is one of the world's most comprehensive human rights documents.
Through the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, Fundamental
Duties, and an independent judiciary, it ensures the protection of the life, liberty, equality, and
dignity of every individual. The Constitution, supported by progressive judicial interpretation,
remains the foundation for the protection and promotion of human rights in India.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
17. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989
Introduction
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989 is the most comprehensive international
treaty on children's rights. It was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 November
1989 and came into force on 2 September 1990. The Convention recognizes that every child is
entitled to civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights without discrimination.
India signed the Convention on 11 December 1992 and ratified it on 11 December 1992, thereby
undertaking to protect and promote the rights of children.
Meaning of a Child
According to Article 1 of the CRC:
A child means every human being below the age of 18 years, unless majority is attained earlier
under the law applicable to the child.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Four Guiding Principles of the CRC
1. NonDiscrimination (Article 2)
Every child enjoys rights without discrimination based on race, religion, sex, language, disability, or
social origin.
A. Survival Rights
Right to life
Right to health care
Right to nutrition
Right to safe drinking water
Right to shelter
B. Development Rights
Right to education
Right to play and recreation
Right to cultural activities
Right to access information
Right to personality development
C. Protection Rights
Protection against child labour
Protection against trafficking
Protection from sexual exploitation
Protection from abuse and neglect
Protection during armed conflict
Protection for refugee children
D. Participation Rights
Freedom of expression
Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion
Freedom of association
Right to be heard in judicial and administrative proceedings
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Functions
Monitors implementation of the Convention.
Examines reports submitted by States Parties.
Issues recommendations (Concluding Observations).
Interprets the Convention through General Comments.
Promotes international cooperation for child rights.
Limitations
Enforcement depends on the willingness of States.
Violations such as child labour and trafficking continue in many countries.
Poverty and lack of resources hinder implementation.
The Committee mainly monitors compliance and cannot directly punish States.
Conclusion
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989 is the most important international treaty
protecting children's rights. It is founded on the principles of non-discrimination, the best interests
of the child, survival and development, and participation. By recognizing children as holders of
rights and requiring States to protect and promote those rights, the CRC has become the global
standard for child welfare and development. India, through constitutional provisions and child
protection laws, has taken significant steps to implement the Convention and safeguard the rights
of every child.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
17A. International Rights of the Child
Introduction
Children are entitled to special care and protection because of their physical and mental
immaturity. The international community recognizes that every child has inherent dignity and
fundamental human rights. The principal international instrument protecting these rights is the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989, adopted by the UN General
Assembly on 20 November 1989. It entered into force on 2 September 1990.
The CRC is the most widely ratified human rights treaty in the world, with 196 States Parties. India
ratified the Convention on 11 December 1992.
Definition of a Child
According to Article 1 of the CRC, a child is every human being below the age of 18 years, unless
majority is attained earlier under the law applicable to the child.
4. Right to Education
Free and compulsory primary education.
Equal access to secondary and higher education.
Education should develop the child's personality, talents, and abilities.
5. Right to Health
Access to healthcare services.
Adequate nutrition and clean drinking water.
Maternal and child healthcare.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
8. Right to Protection from Abuse
Protection against physical, mental, and emotional abuse.
Protection from neglect and exploitation.
6. ILO Convention No. 182 (Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention), 1999
Objective
Eliminate the worst forms of child labour.
Protect children from slavery, trafficking, forced labour, prostitution, and hazardous work.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
7. Optional Protocols to the CRC
(a) Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000)
(b) Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography (2000).
(c) Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure (2011)
Monitoring Mechanism
The Committee on the Rights of the Child monitors implementation of the Convention.
Functions
Examines reports submitted by States.
Issues recommendations and General Comments.
Monitors compliance with the Convention.
Promotes effective implementation of children's rights.
Optional Protocols
1. Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000).
2. Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography (2000).
3. Optional Protocol on a Communications Procedure (2011).
Significance
Protects children's dignity and welfare.
Ensures access to education and healthcare.
Prevents child labour, trafficking, and exploitation.
Promotes equal opportunities for all children.
Guides national child protection laws and policies.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Conclusion
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989 is the world's most
comprehensive treaty on children's rights. It recognizes every child's right to survival, development,
protection, and participation. With 196 States Parties, it has become the global standard for child
welfare. India, having ratified the Convention in 1992, has enacted constitutional and statutory
measures to protect children's rights and ensure their holistic development.
Introduction
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 1979
is often described as the "International Bill of Rights for Women." It was adopted by the United
Nations General Assembly on 18 December 1979 and entered into force on 3 September 1981.
India signed CEDAW on 30 July 1980 and ratified it on 9 July 1993 (with certain reservations and
declarations). The Convention aims to eliminate discrimination against women and ensure equality
in political, economic, social, cultural, civil, and family life.
Objectives of CEDAW
1. To eliminate all forms of discrimination against women.
2. To ensure equality between men and women.
3. To protect women's human rights and dignity.
4. To promote equal participation in political, social, economic, and cultural life.
5. To abolish discriminatory customs and practices.
6. To provide equal opportunities in education and employment.
Structure of CEDAW
Preamble
30 Articles
Divided into 6 Parts
Preamble
Recognizes discrimination against women as a violation of human rights.
Affirms the principles of equality, dignity, and non-discrimination.
Calls upon States to eliminate discrimination against women in all fields.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Part III (Articles 10–14): Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Equal rights in education.
Equal employment opportunities.
Equal access to healthcare.
Economic and social benefits.
Special protection for rural women.
Part IV (Articles 15–16): Equality Before the Law and Family Rights
Equality before the law.
Equal rights in marriage and family relations.
Equal rights relating to property, guardianship, and children.
Composition
23 independent experts elected by the States Parties.
Members serve in their personal capacity.
Functions
Monitors implementation of CEDAW.
Examines reports submitted by States Parties.
Issues recommendations (Concluding Observations).
Adopts General Recommendations interpreting the Convention.
Promotes gender equality worldwide.
4. General Recommendations
The Committee issues General Recommendations to clarify the meaning of Convention provisions
and guide States in implementing women's rights.
5. International Cooperation
The Committee works with:
United Nations agencies.
Specialized agencies.
National Human Rights Institutions.
Civil society organizations and NGOs
Conclusion
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 1979
is the principal international treaty protecting women's rights. It guarantees equality in political,
social, economic, cultural, and family life while requiring States to eliminate discrimination through
legislation, policies, and effective enforcement. The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
against Women, the State reporting system, and the Optional Protocol are the key mechanisms for
implementation. In India, constitutional guarantees and progressive legislation have significantly
advanced the objectives of CEDAW, though continued efforts are necessary to achieve substantive
gender equality.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
18A. Protection of the Rights of Women under the Constitution of India
Introduction
The Constitution of India guarantees equality, dignity, and justice to women. It prohibits
discrimination on the ground of sex and empowers the State to make special provisions for women.
The constitutional framework aims to eliminate gender inequality and ensure social, economic, and
political empowerment of women.
1. Preamble
The Preamble guarantees:
Justice – Social, Economic and Political
Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship
Equality of status and opportunity
Dignity of the individual
These principles form the foundation of women's rights in India.
2. Fundamental Rights
Article 14 – Equality Before Law
Guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.
Women have equal legal rights with men.
Article 15(1) – Prohibition of Discrimination
Prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
Protects women from gender based discrimination.
Article 15(3) – Special Provisions for Women
Permits the State to make special laws and welfare measures for women and children.
Basis for reservations and protective legislation.
Article 16 – Equality of Opportunity in Public Employment
Ensures equal opportunity in government employment.
Prohibits discrimination on the ground of sex.
Article 19
Guarantees freedom of speech, movement, association, profession, and residence equally to
women.
Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty
Protects the right to live with dignity.
Includes rights relating to privacy, reproductive choice, bodily integrity, and protection against
violence.
Article 23
Prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labour.
Protects women from prostitution, trafficking, and exploitation.
Article 24
Prohibits employment of children below 14 years in hazardous occupations, indirectly protecting
the rights of girl children.
Article 39(d)
Equal pay for equal work for both men and women.
Article 39(e)
Protection of the health and strength of women workers.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Article 39(f)
Protection of children, especially girls, from exploitation.
Article 42
Just and humane conditions of work.
Provision for maternity relief.
Article 44
Uniform Civil Code (Directive Principle) to ensure gender justice in personal laws.
Article 45
Early childhood care and education, benefiting girl children.
Article 47
Duty of the State to improve nutrition and public health, particularly benefiting women.
4. Fundamental Duties
Article 51A(e)
It is the duty of every citizen
To renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
Encourages respect for women's dignity and equality.
5. Political Rights
Articles 243D and 243T
Provide reservation of not less than one third of seats for women in Panchayats and Municipalities.
Promote women's participation in local self-government.
9. Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994
Prohibits sex selection and female foeticide.
4. Mission Shakti
Umbrella scheme for women's safety, security, and empowerment.
7. Ujjawala Scheme
Prevents trafficking and rehabilitates victims.
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)
Important Constitutional Amendments
Conclusion
MohakShetty BE (LL.B)