GF14, Rice, Negative
GF14, Rice, Negative
Rapid Paper
Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0101 Japan
Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009. 429
Y. A. Purwestri et al.
have a flowering promotion function (Izawa et al. 2002, Indeed, a mouse PEBP, RKIP, has been shown to interact with
Komiya et al. 2008). and inhibit the activity of the kinase Raf1 (Yeung et al.
Hd3a expression is regulated by Hd1 and Ehd1 (Early 1999).
heading date1) that encodes a B-type response regulator and Most recently, Hd3a and its ortholog have been proposed
is a unique flowering time gene in rice (Doi et al. 2004). Ehd1 as florigens, or mobile flowering signals (Corbesier et al. 2007,
promotes floral transition preferentially under SD condi- Jaeger and Wigge et al. 2007, Lin et al. 2007, Mathieu et al.
tions, even in the absence of functional alleles of Hd1. Expres- 2007, Tamaki et al. 2007, Notaguchi et al. 2008, Tsuji et al.
sion analysis revealed that Ehd1 functions upstream of Hd3a, 2008). The next question that needs to be addressed is the
RFT1 and some MADS-box genes (Doi et al. 2004). More mechanism of Hd3a function. One important step in the
recently, Ghd7, which encodes a CCT- (CO, CO-LIKE and characterization of Hd3a function is to identify other pro-
TIMING OF CAB1) domain protein, was isolated based on teins with which it interacts.
natural variation in rice (Xue et al. 2008). Ghd7 affects levels A study in tomato revealed several SP-interacting pro-
of Ehd1 and Hd3a transcripts, but does not affect Hd1 mRNA teins including a 14-3-3 family member, a protein kinase and
430 Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009.
GF14c interacts with the florigen Hd3a in rice
Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009. 431
Y. A. Purwestri et al.
C FP
A a :G
Os08g0430500 GF14c pe d3
ty :H
- a:
ild 3
Os02g0580300 GF14e W Hd
Os04g0462500 GF14b es es s
av eav em
Os03g0710800 GF14f le l st
Hd3a-GFP
Os11g0546900 GF14d
Os08g0480800 GF14a 14-3-3
Os01g0209200 GF14g
CBB
Os11g0609600 GF14h
B D
s
ex
ap
de
gs
ca e a
a
lin
sh s
ts
s
bl
r
we
s
ed
ed
em
oo
ot
lli
af
af
se
se
flo
ro
st
le
le
GF14a
GF14b
GF14c
GF14d
GF14e
GF14f
GF14g
GF14h
Ubq
Fig. 2 Tissue-specific and subcellular distribution of Hd3a and GF14s family members in rice. (A) A phylogenetic tree was constructed with the
ClustalW program using the neighbor-joining method. The eight GF14 isoforms share a high degree of amino acid identity (85–95%). (B) Rice
GF14 family members are expressed in all organs tested. Using gene-specific primers, RT–PCR was performed with 1 µg of total RNA extracted
from various organs of the wild-type N8 cultivar. (C) Immunoblot detection of cytosolic fractions of wild-type and Hd3a-ox plants. Hd3a and
GF14s were detected by a GFP and by a 14-3-3 antibody, respectively. Coomassie brilliant blue staining (CBB) was used as a loading control. (D)
GF14c is localized mainly in cytosol. Transient expression of GFP–GF14c and Hd3a–mCherry in rice protoplasts was driven by the CaMV 35S and
ubiquitin promoters, respectively. NLS-2xmOrange was used as a marker for the nucleus. mCherry was used as a marker of the nucleus and
cytoplasm. Upper panels: co-expression of GFP–GF14c and Hd3a–mCherry proteins. Lower panels: co-expression of GFP–GF14c and mCherry
proteins. Bar = 10 mm.
plasmid as a marker for transformed cells. As shown in Fig. 3B, phenotypic analysis of GF14c. GF14c-ox plants were delayed
95% of transformed rice protoplasts observed in this experi- by 5–20 d in flowering relative to wild-type plants (Fig. 4B,
ment showed Hd3a and GF14c interaction in both protein C). A t-test confirmed that the flowering time was signifi-
fusion combinations as documented by a strong green fluo- cantly different between GF14c-ox and wild-type plants
rescence concentrated in the cytoplasm. Hd3a-Vn/GUS-Vc (P = 0.0046). Other phenotypes observed in this mutant
or GUS-Vn/GF14c-Vc combination showed remarkably few were erect leaves and longer culms compared with the wild-
numbers of cells with Venus fluorescence (0–10% of the type plants (data not shown). In GF14c-ox plants, overex-
transformed cells). These results clearly demonstrate that pression of GF14c at both the mRNA and the protein level
Hd3a interacts with GF14c mainly in the cytoplasm. was confirmed (Fig. 4D, E).
To study further the function of GF14c in flowering, we
GF14c-overexpressing and gf14c mutant plants also used the gf14c/GF14c heterozygous T-DNA insertion
To characterize the function of GF14c, a GF14c overexpres- mutants in japonica rice cv ‘Dongjin’ generated by Postech,
sion (ox) construct driven by the CaMV 35S promoter was Korea. One heterozygous line (Fig. 5B) possessed a T-DNA
generated and transformed into rice plants (Fig. 4A). T1 insertion in the second exon of GF14c (Fig. 5A, D). We ger-
generation transgenic plants (n = 15) were used for the minated 50 seeds derived from the gf14c T-DNA mutants
432 Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009.
GF14c interacts with the florigen Hd3a in rice
CBB
GUS-Vn
+
GF14c-Vc
Hd3a-Vn
+
α-His
Fig. 3 In vitro and in vivo interaction of Hd3a with GF14c. (A) Hd3a–GST interacts with GF14c–His in vitro. GF14c-tagged His was pulled down
by Hd3a-tagged GST. GF14c was detected with an α-His antibody. (B) BiFC analysis of the interaction between Hd3a and GF14c in rice protoplasts.
Bars = 10 µm.
A C 9
8
35S cDNA GF14c nos
7
6
Plant number
5
B
4 WT
panicle 3 GF14c ox
2
1
0
57 58 59 60 61 63 65 69 70 82 83
Days to heading (days after sowing)
GF14c ox
D WT #1 #2
hpt
E GF14c ox
GF14c (trans)
WT #1 #2
Hd3a Tubulin
ubq
WT #1 #10
GF14c -ox
Fig. 4 Characterization of GF14c-overexpressing (GF14c-ox) plants. (A) GF14c expression was controlled by the CaMV 35S promoter. (B) Growth
of N8 wild-type and GF14c-ox plants under SD conditions. The arrow indicates a panicle. (C) Flowering time of GF14c-ox plants (GF14c ox) was
delayed under SD conditions. (D) GF14c and Hd3a mRNA levels in wild-type and GF14c-ox plants. 1 and 2 indicate independent transgenic lines.
The GF14c transgene was detected in transgenic plants. Hd3a levels in transgenic plants were not changed compared with the wild type. (E)
GF14c protein levels in GF14c-ox plants. Tubulin was used as a loading control.
Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009. 433
Y. A. Purwestri et al.
A D
P1 P2 P3
gf14c/GF14c
RB LB
TAA WT #1 #2
ATG
P1-P2
P1-P3
B
panicle E
gf14c/GF14c
WT #1 #2
C GF14c
60
50 F gf14c/GF14c
40 WT #1 #2
30 14-3-3
20
CBB
10
0
WT gf14c/ gf14c/
GF14c-1 GF14c-3 WT gf14c/GF14c
Fig. 5 Characterization of gf14c T-DNA insertion plants. (A) Structure of genomic GF14c (Os08g0430500) and position of the T-DNA insertion.
GF14c consists of five exons (filled boxes) and four introns (lines). The T-DNA was inserted into the second exon in the opposite orientation to
the direction of GF14c transcription. Arrows indicate primers used for analyzing the T-DNA insertion site. LB and RB represent the left and right
borders of T-DNA, respectively. (B) Growth of wild-type and two gf14c mutant plants (cv ‘Dongjin’) under SD conditions. Arrows indicate panicles.
(C) Heading date of gf14c mutant and wild-type plants under SD conditions. Error bars represent the SEM. (D) PCR analysis of GF14c with primers
(Supplementary Table S1) indicated in (A). (E) GF14c and Hd3a mRNA levels in wild-type and GF14c-expressing plants. (F) Expression level of
GF14c protein in GF14c-ox plants. Coomassie brilliant blue staining (CBB) was used as a loading control.
and found that 24 were heterozygous, seven were wild type apical meristem (SAM). Since the tissue localization of Hd3a
and 19 did not germinate, which were likely to be homozy- protein was determined using transgenic rice plants express-
gous, suggesting that the mutation may be lethal. The gf14c/ ing Hd3a–GFP fusion protein driven by the Hd3a promoter,
GF14c plants flowered earlier than those of the wild type by and Hd3a protein was present in vascular tissue from the leaf
about 14 d (12–17-d depending on the plants) (Fig. 5C). A blades and transported through the phloem (Tamaki et al.
t-test confirmed that the flowering time was significantly 2007), we prepared a cDNA library from leaf blades to search
different between the wild type and gf14c (P = 0.0387, n = 5). for Hd3a-interacting proteins in a yeast two-hybrid screen.
GF14c expression at both the mRNA and protein levels in We identified GF14c, a member of the 14-3-3 protein family
these mutants plants was lower than in wild-type plants whose members are highly conserved in all eukaryotes (Ferl
(Fig. 5E, F). These results clearly indicate that GF14c is 1996). The 14-3-3 proteins are well known as proteins that
involved in regulation of flowering time in rice. are involved in signaling pathways in eukaryotes. In plants,
14-3-3 proteins have been shown to interact with FT and
TFL1 in Arabidopsis, and with SP and SFT in tomato (Pnueli
Discussion
et al. 2001, Lifschitz et al. 2006). More recently, a comprehen-
Hd3a is thought to move along leaf cells and the vascular sive study using yeast two-hybrid and affinity chromatography
system of leaves and stems, and exerts its action in the shoot with mass spectrometry provided a large number of novel
434 Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009.
GF14c interacts with the florigen Hd3a in rice
Hd3a
flowering
Hd3a
Hd3a
OsFD?
OsMADS14/15
nucleus
Hd3a
Hd3a
GF14c
Hd3a Hd3a
Companion cells
Fig. 6 Possible role of GF14c in Hd3a signaling in rice flowering. As the floral stimulus that controls floral transition in the shoot apical meristem
(SAM), Hd3a has the capacity to traffic cell to cell and move long distances via the phloem. Hd3a is a small protein with molecular weight 23 kDa,
thus it may be able to move from companion cells to sieve elements. The overexpression of GF14c may cause inhibition of Hd3a trafficking to
SAM and leads to a delay in flowering. In the absence of GF14c, Hd3a may move freely into the nucleus and activates floral induction.
putative 14-3-3-interacting partners in barley (Schoonheim only a very weak fluorescent signal was observed in the
et al. 2007). Interestingly, a wide range of 14-3-3 targets have nucleus (Fig. 2D). To address the question of whether the
functions in various signal transduction pathways and might interaction between Hd3a and GF14c would inhibit shut-
form a platform for cross-talk in the signal transduction tling of Hd3a from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, we per-
pathway. Binding of 14-3-3 proteins regulates their partner formed a BiFC experiment. The results demonstrate that the
proteins through a variety of mechanisms, such as altering Hd3a–GF14c protein complex is mainly localized in the
their catalytic activity, subcellular localization, stability or cytoplasm (Fig. 3B). This result strongly suggests that Hd3a
their interaction with other proteins (Roberts, 2003). and GF14c interaction increases Hd3a cytoplasmic reten-
Identification of GF14c as an Hd3a partner has been tion. Therefore, the delayed flowering phenotype in GF14c-ox
confirmed by several methods. The results from yeast two- plants can be explained by the increased cytoplasmic reten-
hybrid assays using a full-length construct, in vitro pull-down tion of Hd3a by GF14c (Fig. 6). In Arabidopsis, to initiate
and BiFC assays demonstrated the interaction between floral transition in the shoot apex, FT interacts with FD, a
Hd3a and GF14c in rice. The subcellular distribution of bZIP transcription factor that localizes in the nucleus to
GF14c demonstrated their localization in both the cyto- induce target meristem identity genes such as APETALA1
plasm and nucleus. The 14-3-3 proteins are highly conserved (AP1) (Abe et al. 2005). This process could be attenuated by
throughout the animal and plant kingdom. In Arabidopsis, the cytoplasmic retention of Hd3a by GF14c. Several lines of
there are at least 12 isoforms, whereas eight isoforms exist in evidence indicate the function of 14-3-3 protein in nuclear–
rice. These proteins are known as a component associated cytoplasmic shuttling in the signal transduction pathway
with a number of different proteins in signal transduction (Igarashi et al. 2001, Ishida et al. 2004).
pathways, including plant hormone signaling pathways. Another mechanism which could possibly explain the
Overexpression of GF14c caused late flowering, suggest- phenotypes of GF14c-ox plants and the gf14c knockout
ing that 14-3-3 functions as a negative regulator of flowering. mutants is the interaction of Hd3a with GF14c, which inhib-
Hd3a protein is localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus; its movement of Hd3a in the long-distance trafficking
however, GF14c is mainly localized in the cytoplasm and through the phloem (Fig. 6). Interestingly, the gf14c knockout
Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009. 435
Y. A. Purwestri et al.
mutants exhibited an early flowering phenotype. These with Hd3a. A swapping experiment, using full-length
mutants also showed a dwarf phenotype and increased tiller constructs of GF14c and Hd3a, either as bait or as prey, was
numbers (Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting that GF14c performed. Interactions were tested on SC medium lacking
could also function independently of flower induction at the histidine (–H) or lacking histidine and containing 2.5 mM
SAM. When expression levels of GF14c are low in the leaf, 3-aminotriazole (3-AT).
Hd3a protein may be capable of moving long distances freely
from companion cells to the phloem sieve elements since Full-length cDNA construction
Hd3a is a small protein that is under the size exclusion limit Since only a partial cDNA was obtained from yeast two-
of plasmodesmata (Lough and Lucas 2006, Giakountis hybrid screening, we constructed a full-length GF14c cDNA
and Coupland 2008). In contrast to our results in rice, in based on sequence information in the rice DNA database.
Arabidopsis, loss of 14-3-3 µ and 14-3-3 υ functions pro- We designed forward and reverse primers (see Supplementary
duced a slight delay in flowering (3–5 d) in comparison with Table S1) to produce a full-length PCR fragment using cDNA
the wild type (Mayfield et al. 2007). These authorts also as a template. The PCR fragment was then subcloned into
436 Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009.
GF14c interacts with the florigen Hd3a in rice
Tissue-specific expression plasmid was introduced at the same time as the marker for
Total RNA from seeds, seedlings, leaf blades, leaf sheaths, transformed cells. The number of cells with reproduced
stems, shoot apices, roots and rice suspension culture cells mVenus fluorescence in the mCherry-expressing cells was
were extracted using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) and scored.
treated with DNase I (Invitrogen). The cDNA was synthe-
sized from 1 µg of total RNA using SuperScript II reverse Supplementary data
transcriptase (Invitrogen). The cDNA was subjected to Supplementary data are available at PCP online.
semi-quantitative analysis of gene expression using PCR with
primers specific for GF14 family members, Hd3a and Funding
ubiquitin (see Supplementary Table S1).
The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
GF14 protein expression in planta Technology, Japan Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
Leaves and stems from wild-type, Hd3a::Hd3a:GFP-overex- Priority Areas (grants 10182102 and 19090013 to K.S.); the
Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009. 437
Y. A. Purwestri et al.
Giakountis, A. and Coupland, G. (2008) Phloem transport of flowering Monna, L., Lin, H., Kojima, S., Sasaki, T. and Yano, M. (2002) Genetic
signals. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11: 687–694. dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3,
Hanzawa, Y., Money, T. and Bradley, D. (2005) A single amino acid into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b, controlling heading date in rice.
converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 772–778.
USA 102: 7748–7753. Muslin, A. and Xing, H. (2000) 14-3-3 proteins: regulation of subcellular
Hayama, R., Yokoi, S., Tamaki, S., Yano, M. and Shimamoto, K. (2003) localization by molecular interference. Cell Signal. 12: 703–709.
Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day Notaguchi, M., Abe, M., Kimura, T., Daimon, Y., Kobayashi, T.,
flowering in rice. Nature 422: 719–722. Yamaguchi, A., et al. (2008) Long-distance, graft-transmissible action
Igarashi, D., Ishida, S., Fukazawa, J. and Takahashi, Y. (2001) 14-3-3 of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering.
proteins regulate intracellular localization of the bZIP transcriptional Plant Cell Physiol. 49: 1645–1658.
activator RSG. Plant Cell 13: 2483–2497. Park, S., Kim, S., Lee, S., Je, B., Piao, H., Park, S., et al. (2008) Rice
Imaizumi, T. and Kay, S. (2006) Photoperiodic control of flowering: not
Indeterminate 1 (OsId1) is necessary for the expression of Ehd1 (Early
only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 550–558.
heading date 1) regardless of photoperiod. Plant J. 56: 1018–1029.
Ishida, S., Fukazawa, J., Yuasa, T. and Takahashi, Y. (2004) Involvement
Pnueli, L., Gutfinger, T., Hareven, D., Ben-Naim, O., Ron, N., Adir, N.,
of 14-3-3 signaling protein binding in the functional regulation of
438 Plant Cell Physiol. 50(3): 429–438 (2009) doi:10.1093/pcp/pcp012 © The Author 2009.