0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

TBLT Lesson

This lesson plan is designed for B2 level students using Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) to enhance their fluency and accuracy in obligation and permission language within a 45-minute session. It includes various stages such as lead-in, task cycle, and language focus, emphasizing meaningful communication and error correction. The plan also anticipates potential problems and provides solutions to ensure effective participation and learning outcomes.

Uploaded by

mary.mhvand
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

TBLT Lesson

This lesson plan is designed for B2 level students using Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) to enhance their fluency and accuracy in obligation and permission language within a 45-minute session. It includes various stages such as lead-in, task cycle, and language focus, emphasizing meaningful communication and error correction. The plan also anticipates potential problems and provides solutions to ensure effective participation and learning outcomes.

Uploaded by

mary.mhvand
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

🧾 LESSON PLAN

🏫 Context
 Level: B2
 Lesson Type: TBLT (Task-Based Language Teaching)
 Time: 45 minutes
 Main Focus: Obligation & Permission

🎯 Main Aim
Students will develop fluency and accuracy in using obligation and permission language
through a communicative task.

🔹 Subsidiary Aims
 Improve speaking fluency
 Practice negotiation and decision-making
 Raise awareness of grammatical accuracy

📊 Materials
 PPT slides (University Rules Task)
⚠️ANTICIPATED PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS
Problem Solution
Students overuse “must” Encourage alternatives (should, allowed to)
Grammar errors (must to, don’t must) Address in language focus stage
Students switch to L1 Assign roles, monitor actively
Weak participation Ensure group roles (leader, presenter)

Stage Time Aim Procedure Interaction Rationale

Lead-in (Pre- 5–7 Activate schema Teacher asks: “What S–S → T–S Activates prior
Stage Time Aim Procedure Interaction Rationale

rules do we have at
knowledge
university?” “Which are
(Scrivener); creates
task) min & introduce topic good/bad?” Students
need for
discuss in pairs, then
communication (Ellis)
share ideas

Teacher elicits
Provides minimal
examples: must, can’t,
Preparation 3–5 Prepare students scaffolding without
don’t have to and T–S
(Pre-task) min for task pre-teaching too
boards them (no deep
much (Willis)
explanation)

Teacher sets task: “You


are a student
Clear instructions
Task Clarify task & committee. Create 8–
3 min T–S reduce confusion
Introduction instructions 10 rules.” ICQs: “Do
(Scrivener)
you work alone?” “Do
you need to agree?”

Students work in
groups to create rules Meaning-focused
Develop fluency
Task Cycle 12–15 including obligation, interaction (Ellis);
through S–S
(Main Task) min permission, promotes negotiation
communication
prohibition, and no (Long)
obligation

Teacher monitors,
(during notes errors and good Supports fluency-first
Monitoring Collect language T
task) language, does NOT approach (Harmer)
interrupt

Groups present their Task outcome


5–7 Provide purpose
Report Stage rules; class votes for S–S → T–S increases motivation
min & outcome
best system (Willis)

Teacher writes errors


Language from students (e.g., Noticing errors
Focus (Error 5 min Improve accuracy must to, don’t must) S–S → T–S promotes learning
Correction) Students correct in (Thornbury)
pairs

Teacher highlights
Language
forms: must / have to / Focus on form after
Clarification 5 min Clarify grammar T–S
can / don’t have to / meaning (Ellis)
(Form)
mustn’t

Freer Practice 3–5 Personalize Students discuss: “Do S–S Personalization


min language you agree with other improves retention
groups? What would
Stage Time Aim Procedure Interaction Rationale

you change?” (Harmer)

Teacher gives content + Reinforces learning


Consolidate language feedback, and motivation
Feedback 3 min T–S
learning highlights good
examples

🔷 METHODOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION
This lesson follows Task-Based Language Teaching principles:
 Ellis (2003): Language emerges through meaningful use
 Willis (1996): Task cycle (pre-task → task → language focus)
 Scrivener: Learning through communication
 Harmer: Fluency before accuracy
👉 Key principle:
Focus on meaning first, then form

🔥 FINAL COMMENT (FOR YOUR COORDINATOR)


You can add this at the end of your plan:
“This lesson prioritizes meaning-focused interaction through a communicative task, followed
by a delayed focus on form, in line with Ellis’ TBLT framework and Willis’ task cycle.”

You might also like