Project Report Raj Final
Project Report Raj Final
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Drug Discovery and Development: -
Drug discovery and development is a scientific process through which new medicines
are identified, evaluated, and brought to the market for therapeutic use. It is a highly
complex and multidisciplinary field involving chemistry, biology, pharmacology, and
medical sciences. The aim is to develop drugs that are safe, effective, and of high
quality for the treatment and prevention of diseases such as Cancer and infectious
disorders.
These hit compounds are then optimized to improve their effectiveness, safety,
and drug-like properties, leading to the selection of a promising “lead” compound.
The next stage is preclinical testing, where the lead compound is tested in laboratory
experiments and animal models to evaluate its toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and overall
safety profile. If the results are satisfactory, the drug enters clinical trials, which are
conducted in humans.
Clinical trials are carried out in three main phases. Phase I trials involve a
small number of healthy volunteers to assess safety and dosage. Phase II trials are
conducted on a larger group of patients to evaluate the drug’s effectiveness and side
effects. Phase III trials include a much larger population to confirm effectiveness,
monitor adverse reactions, and compare the new drug with existing treatments. If the
clinical trials are successful, the data is submitted to regulatory authorities for
approval.
use. Even after approval, the drug continues to be monitored in the post-marketing or
Phase IV stage to detect any long-term or rare side effects in the general population.
Drug development is a long and complex process used to discover, test, and bring a
new medicine to market. It ensures that drugs are safe, effective, and of good quality
before being used by patients.
This is the initial stage where scientists identify a disease target (such as a protein or
gene) and search for potential drug molecules.
2. Preclinical Research
Before testing in humans, the drug is tested in the laboratory and on animals.
This stage tests the drug in humans and is divided into 3 phases:
• Phase I
Small group (20–100 healthy volunteers)
Focus: Safety and dosage
• Phase II
Larger group (100–300 patients)
Focus: Effectiveness and side effects
• Phase III
Large population (1,000–3,000+ patients)
4. Regulatory Approval
Once approved, the drug is produced on a large scale and made available to the
public.
• Large-scale production
• Quality control
• Distribution to pharmacies and hospitals
• Marketing and awareness
CADD is broadly classified into two main types: structure-based drug design
(SBDD) and ligand-based drug design (LBDD). Structure-based drug design is used
when the three-dimensional structure of the target protein is known. In this method,
researchers study the active site of the protein and design or screen molecules that can
fit into the binding pocket effectively. Techniques such as molecular docking and
molecular dynamics simulation are commonly used to analysed the interaction
between the drug and the target protein. Ligand-based drug design is used when the
structure of the target protein is not available but information about known active
compounds exists. In this approach, scientists analysed existing molecules that show
biological activity and identify common chemical features responsible for their
effectiveness. Methods such as pharmacophore modelling and quantitative structure–
activity relationship (QSAR) are used to predict the activity of new compounds based
on structural similarity.
CADD is widely used in modern drug discovery for diseases such as cancer,
viral infections, bacterial infections, and neurological disorders. It has significantly
contributed to the development of antiviral drugs, including drugs used in HIV and
COVID-19 treatment research. Pharmaceutical industries extensively use CADD tools
such as AutoDock, Schrödinger Suite, MOE, and Discovery Studio for drug screening
and optimization. One of the major advantages of CADD is that it reduces the need
for extensive laboratory experiments by predicting the most promising compounds in
advance.
main goal of molecular docking is to estimate the binding affinity between the ligand
and the target, which indicates how effectively a drug can inhibit or activate a
biological function.
In molecular docking, both the ligand and the receptor are modelled in three-
dimensional form. The ligand is placed into the binding site of the receptor in
different orientations, and each position is evaluated using scoring functions. These
scoring functions predict the stability and strength of the interaction based on factors
such as hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic forces, and van der
Waals forces.
Molecular docking is generally divided into two main steps: search algorithm
and scoring function. The search algorithm explores possible conformations and
orientations of the ligand within the binding site, while the scoring function ranks
these conformations based on predicted binding energy. The best docking pose is the
one with the lowest binding energy and strongest interaction with the target
[Link] technique is widely used in drug discovery to screen large libraries of
compounds and identify potential drug candidates quickly and efficiently. It reduces
the need for extensive laboratory experiments by narrowing down the most promising
molecules for further testing. Molecular docking is especially useful in the
development of drugs for cancer, infectious diseases, and neurological disorders.
Molecular docking is classified based on the flexibility of the ligand (drug molecule)
and the receptor (target protein). The main types are
1. Rigid Docking
5. Ensemble Docking
1. Rigid Docking
In rigid docking, both the ligand and the receptor are treated as completely rigid
structures. No flexibility is allowed in either molecule during docking. The ligand is
simply fitted into the fixed active site of the receptor. This method is fast and
computationally simple but less accurate because it does not reflect real biological
conditions.
In flexible docking, the ligand is allowed to rotate and change its shape while binding
to the receptor. The receptor remains rigid in most cases. This method provides more
realistic results compared to rigid docking because it considers different
conformations of the ligand.
In this method, the receptor protein is also allowed some flexibility during docking.
This is important because proteins can change shape when a ligand binds to them.
However, this method is more complex and requires higher computational power.
Induced fit docking allows flexibility in both the ligand and the receptor. It considers
that the protein binding site may adjust its shape to fit the ligand. This method is more
accurate and closely represents real biological interactions but is computationally
expensive.
5. Ensemble Docking
In ensemble docking, multiple different conformations of the receptor are used for
docking. This helps in considering protein flexibility without changing its structure
during simulation. It improves prediction accuracy and is widely used in modern drug
discovery.
1.5 Diabetes:
Types of Diabetes
1. Type 1 Diabetes (Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) Caused by autoimmune
destruction of pancreatic β-cells, leading to absolute insulin deficiency. Usually
occurs in childhood or adolescence. Requires lifelong insulin therapy
2. Type 2 Diabetes (Non–Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) Caused by insulin
resistance and a relative lack of insulin secretion. Common in adults, often linked
with obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and poor diet. Managed by diet control, exercise, oral
antidiabetic drugs, and sometimes insulin.
▪ Blurred vision
Antidiabetic Defenses:
1. Hormonal Defenses:
▪ Insulin: Secreted by pancreatic β-cells;promotes glucose uptake by
muscles and adipose tissue and inhibits hepatic glucose output.
▪ Glucagon: Secreted by α-cells; balances insulin by increasing blood
glucose during fasting.
▪ Incretins (GLP-1, GIP): Enhance insulin secretion after meals and
slow gastric emptying.
▪ Amylin: Co-secreted with insulin; helps regulate blood glucose spikes
after meals.
➢ Prevention
➢ Biological Source
Leucas aspera (Willd.) (Family: Lamiaceae) is a small, erect, annual herb known as
"Thumbai,"
➢ Geographical Source
Common weed found throughout South and Southeast Asia, with a primary
distribution across India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Java, and Mauritius. It
thrives in tropical and subtropical regions, often found in cultivated fields, roadways, and
sunny areas.
➢ Macroscopic Characters
• Leaves: Opposite, simple, hairy, irregularly toothed margins
• Stem: Acutely quadrangular (square-shaped in cross-section)
• Flowers: Small, white, sessile, arrranges in dense terminal
• Bracts: 6 mm long, linear, acute, bristle-tipped, ciliate with long slender hairs.
• Odor: Aromatic
• Taste: Slightly bitter
➢ Microscopic Characters
• Stem Structure: Square-shaped in cross-section with four distinct ridges, containing a
single-layered epidermis
• Trichomes: Abundant non-glandular, multicellular (3-4 celled), uniseriate,
lignified hairs are present, alongside sessile glandular trichomes with multicellular heads.
• Cortex: Narrow parenchyma, with collenchymatous cells (3-8 rows) specifically
located under the ridges.
• Vascular Bundle: A ring of bicollateral vascular bundles connected by
interfascicular sclerenchyma
• Leaf Mesophyll: Displays distinct palisade and spongy parenchyma cells.
➢ Chemical Constituents
• Flavonoids and Phenolic Compounds
• Triterpenoids and Triterpenoid Acids
• Flower Components:
• Alkaloids
• Essential oils
• Diterpenes and Glycosides
• Steroids (β-sitosterol)
➢ Pharmacological Actions
• Anti-Diabetic
• Anti-inflammatory
• Antimicrobial
• Antioxidant
• Hepatoprotective
• Anti-Cancer
• Used for skin problems, gout, rheumatism
➢ Uses
• Significant Blood Glucose Reduction
• Improved Glucose Tolerance
• Antioxidant Support
• Lipid Level Management:
AIM: -
OBJECTIVE: -
The objective of the present study is to perform molecular docking of Metformin and of
chemical constituents of Leucas Aspera with the 5Y20 receptor to evaluate and compare their
binding affinity, molecular interactions, and potential inhibitory effects responsible for
antidiabetic activity. This computational approach will help in understanding the binding
mode, key amino acid residues involved in interaction, and structural requirements for
enhanced biological activity. The study of physicochemical properties, ADME and toxicity of
selected chemical constituents of Leucas Aspera by using computational software. The
outcome of the study will aid in identifying more potent lead molecule that may serve as
promising leads for further drug development against diabetes mellitus.
3. EXPERIMENT WORK: -
The software is widely used for virtual screening of large compound libraries to identify
potential drug candidates. It helps in predicting binding affinity and selecting the best ligand
based on docking scores. PyRx also supports visualization of molecular interactions, which
aids in understanding how a drug binds to its target receptor.
The software includes various modules for molecular docking, pharmacophore modelling,
quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studies, and virtual screening.
Structure was drawn using chemsketch software and then the structure was cleaned by using
the clean structure tool and then structure was saved in the working folder as mol file. This
mole file was the accessed in Avogadro Software tool in which that the mol file is converted
to pdb format and then the structure was optimized by using the optimization tool and then
saved the optimized structure in the working directory as pdb file.
2 Baicalein 5,6,7-trihydroxy-2-phenylchromen-4-
one
3 Beta- (3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-17-
sitosterol [(2R,5R)-5-ethyl-6-methylheptan-2-
yl]-10,13-dimethyl-
2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,
17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]
phenanthren-3-ol
4 Campester : (3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-17-
ol [(2R,5R)-5,6-dimethylheptan-2-yl]-
10,13-dimethyl-
2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,
17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]
phenanthren-3-ol
5 Hexadecan hexadecane
e
6 Humulene (1E,4E)-2,6,6,9-
tetramethylcycloundeca-1,4,8-triene
7 Leucaspero [(1S,5S,6S,8R)-8-acetyloxy-5-(1-
ne A acetyloxy-3-hydroxy-3-methylpent-4-
enyl)-1,5,6-trimethyl-2-oxo-4,6,7,8-
tetrahydro-3H-naphthalen-1-
yl]methyl acetate
8 Oleanolic (4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8aR,10S,12aR,14b
Acid S)-10-hydroxy-2,2,6a,6b,9,9,12a-
heptamethyl-
1,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-
tetradecahydropicene-4a-carboxylic
acid
10 Pentadecan pentadecane
e
11 Stigmaster (3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-17-
ol [(E,2R,5S)-5-ethyl-6-methylhept
-3-en-2-yl]-10,13-dimethyl-
2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17
-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta
[a] phenanthren-3-ol
12 Triterpenoi (4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8aR,9R,10S,12aR,
d 14bS)-10-hydroxy-2,2,6a,6b,9,12a-
hexamethyl-9-(sulfooxymethyl)-
1,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-
tetradecahydropicene-4a-carboxylic
acid
13 Ursolic (1S,2R,4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8aR,10S,12
Acid aR,14bS)-10-hydroxy-
1,2,6a,6b,9,9,12a-heptamethyl-
2,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-
tetradecahydro-1H-picene-4a-
carboxylic acid
14 Metformin 1-[(diaminomethylidene)amino]-N,N-
(Standard) dimethylmethanimidamide
hydrochloride
• The download PDB structure (5Y20) was opened in Discovery Studio Visualizer.
• All water molecule, heteroatoms, and co-crystallized ligand were removed to clean
the receptor.
• Polar hydrogen atom were added to stabilized the protein structure.
• The active site residues were defined based on the known Diabetes binding pocket.
• The final receptor file was saved in PDBQT format using AutoDock tools for
compatibility with docking software.
Lipinski rule was used to assess the physiochemical properties of all the selected ligands and
to predict their drug like properties, and the Swiss ADME as used to computer SMILE
structure of each compound.
3.5 ADME Studies: -ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion) studies
are indeed crucial in drug development to assess how a drug behaves the body. Swiss ADME
software was used to determine these properties of each ligand.
3.6 Druglikeness :-
SwissADME evaluates drug-likeness by applying rules such as Lipinski, Ghose, Veber, Egan,
and Muegge, along with physicochemical properties like molecular weight, lipophilicity, and
polarity, to predict whether a compound is suitable for oral drug development.
It allows users to input a compound (via name, SMILES, or structure) and predicts over 60
toxicity endpoints, including acute toxicity (LD₅₀), organ toxicity (like hepatotoxicity and
neurotoxicity), carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, immunotoxicity, and clinical toxicity.
The platform uses multiple predictive models (about 61) based on approaches such as
fragment analysis, pharmacophore modelling, and machine learning algorithms (e.g.,
Random Forest and neural networks) to generate results with confidence scores.
1. Physicochemical properties: -
2. ADME Properties: -
ADME data predict using the Swiss ADME online web server database of phytocompounds.
3. Druglikeness :-
No score
4. Toxicity Study :-
Toxicity prediction is the important step in drug development and design. High demand for
computational predictive model to evaluate the potent toxic effects of drugs. In silico study
toxicity of drug is evaluating by Protox 3.0 online database.
class (mg/kg)
Table No.6. Binding affinity of phytoconstituents of Leucas Aspera with 5Y20 receptor
11 Stigmasterol -7.8
12 Triterpenoid -7.4
13 Ursolic Acid -7.3
14 Metformin -5.0
No
1. ALPHA 1-
STIGMASTEROL
2. BETA SITOSTEROL
3. BAICALEIN
4. CAMPESTEROL
5. HEXADECANE
6. HUMULENE
7. LEUCASPERONE
8. OLEANOLIC ACID
9. OLEIC ACID
10. PENTADECANE
11. STIGMASTEROL
12. TRITERPENOID
14. METFORMIN
5. CONCLUSION: -
The chemical constituent Alpha1-Sitosteroll have more binding affinity with receptor 5Y20
for antidiabetic activity. The ADMET studies indicates it was safer than metformin and
easily absorbed from GIT and cannot crossed BBB. Therefore, this molecule explores for
further development of new, potent antidiabetic agent with minimum side effects.
6. REFERENCES: -
2. Rang, H.P. & Hill, R.G. (2013). Drug Development. In: Drug Discovery and
Development (Second Edition). Elsevier. Available at:
[Link]
science/computer-aided-drug-design
[Link]
[Link]
7. Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R., & Bajorath, J. (2004). Docking and scoring in
virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.
[Link]
8. Nabuurs, S. B., Wagener, M., & de Vlieg, J. (2007). A flexible approach to induced.
[Link]