1.
Some people think that the government should
provide free education to students in university. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
Đồng ý hoàn toàn hoặc không đồng ý hoàn toàn -> dễ viết view 1, khó
view 2
Đồng ý 1 phần (giống discuss both views)
Some individuals are of the claim that providing university education with
any cost that students must bear is highly beneficial and should be
implemented by the government. Personally, I totally/partly
agree/disagree with this suggestion based on some major reasons that
are explained in this essay.
*Main 1- chứng minh tại sao lại miễn phí giáo dục đại học (đưa ra bối
cảnh)
- help poor students
- more access to education
- encourage people to learn more
- alleviate financial burden on students
- finding talented individuals
- foster (nuôi dưỡng) a sense of equality which gives poor students a
chance
- improve the economy
On the other hand, there are some persuasive rationales (lập luận
thuyết phục) that support the claim that university education should be
free of charge.
(C1) In this day and age, due to stagnant (trì tệ) inflation (lạm
phát và đình trệ), the cost of education has increased significantly,
causing problems for individuals to make university entry if they come
from disadvantageous socio-economic backgrounds. This would
result in their inability to contribute to workforce, making the country fail
to develop effectively. If university education can be given to students for
free, many talented individuals can contribute to the workforce, boosting
economic development and transforming the quality of living of the whole
population.
(C2) Nowadays, the cost of education has increased significantly due to
the higher demand for quality, teaching facilities, and human resources,
effectively prohibiting students with lower means of living from
entering universities. This issue leads to the inability of talented
individuals to contribute to their nations’ workforce, slowing down
economic development. If university education is given for free, such a
problem would not occur, helping the nations develop better thanks to an
improved workforce.
*Main 2
- Chính phủ k đủ budget để cover:
ĐK cần để khẳng định mình đúng
+ slg hs
+ chi phí
+ độ lớn của national budget
(C1) On the other hand, despite the idealistic nature of making
university education free of charge, its actual application could bring
about many obstacles and problems. The coverage of such an
expenditure means that the government is required to handle an
increasing amount of tuition free and a large number of students. Also,
some nations, especially developing ones, may not have a flexible budget
that can be spent on such a large expense. As a result, if the proposal of
removing the financial obligations for students is implemented, many
governments would not manage to complete such tasks.
(C2) On the other hand, despite the idealistic nature of making
university education free of charge, its actual application could bring
about many obstacles and problems. Given the very large number of
university students in a nation and the increasing cost of education in this
stage, covering the entire tuition fee for students would require massive
amounts of financial resources. Unfortunately, many nations, especially
developing ones, may not have a budget that is large enough for such
coverage. As a result, the proposed measure may not be implemented
successfully.
*END
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether the
cost of university education should be taken on by all students, I think that
the government still need to provide financial aid on a case- by case basis.
While students with disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds should
receive support, ones who can pay still need to follow through with their
financial obligations to ensure the function of the university.
2. Some people indicate that apartments are the best
types of housing, while others argue that private
houses in the street are better. Discuss both views
and give own opinion.
Some individuals are of the opinion that the optimal (tối ưu) type of
accommodation is apartments. In contrast, others think that residing in a
private house one the street is a superior option. Although both schools of
thought offer merit, I agree more with the former/(latter) perspective/
the view that the final decision should be made based on the
actual needs of each household.
*Main
Khổ 1- view 1 =>giải thích tại sao ngta nghĩ chung cư là ok nhất
(giá rẻ)
On the one hand, there are some major rationales (lý do). On the one
hand, there are some major rationales (lý do) that explain why some
people think that apartments have the potential to be best
accommodation type. On the same area of land, the construction of
apartments would generally yield (sx ra) a large number of housing units
compared to what can be achieved if private houses are built. Also, the
shared facilities and amenities would reduce the demand for travel,
further cutting down the cost of living. Thus, the affordability makes
apartments suitable to people with lower means of living, which generally
makes up the largest parts of our population.
Khổ 2- view 2 (privacy/ private spaces/ valuable in real-estates)
On the other hand, opponents of the previous view claim that
private houses on the street are better form of accommodation. The close
proximity (ở gần nhau) with other people, which is common in apartment
complex, may disrupt the personal living space. For house on the street ,
such an issue could be mitigated better due to better insulation from the
outside environment. Also, the value of private houses on the street has
been proven to increase better compared to apartments, making them a
worthy form of investment that yields more value in the future.
In conclusion, although there are mixed options on determining the best
forms of accommodation, I believe that the ultimate decision needs to be
made according to the demand and financial conditions of each
household. If a family values privacy and has an interest in investment, a
private house on the street is a superior option. In contrast, the lower cost
of living associated with apartments is inevitably the best option for
people with lower levels of income.
3. Nowadays, some nation tax sugar more heavily to
help citizens eat healthily. Do the advantages
outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, taxing sugar more heavily to make people’s diets
healthier has become an approach that some nations have adopted. IN
this essay, I would evaluate both pros and cons before proposing whether
or not the positive aspect overperform its drawback.
*Sugar có problematic gì => hậu quả, ví dụ=> tăng giá sugar =>
ít ăn lại và healthy hơn
On the other hand, there are some benefits associated with imposing a
high tax level on sugar to improve the diets of citizens. As sugar is highly
affordable and can enhance the taste of many dishes, it is virtually
present in many parts of our diets, causing excessive accumulation of fats
that lead to health problems, ranging from obesity to cardiovascular
diseases. If the price of sugar is made more expensive, its consumption
may plunge, helping people eat better and avoid health issues. This would
relieve a lot of burden on each of citizen and the whole healthcare
system.
On the other hand, this measure would have some problematic
implications that should receive more attention. Sugar has been
important part of our diets for many centuries as I exist in various forms
and many types of food, which ultimately give us energy to function.
When the price of sugar increases, many foods that moderate amounts of
it would have the price surged according, causing problems for people’s
accessibility to food and prompting backlashes from general consumers.
In conclusion, after assessing both the positive and negative implications
of the measure that imposes higher tax on sugar to improve people’s
diets, I think the benefits outweigh the negative aspects. As many food
producers over-utilize sugar and are directly responsible for causing more
health problems for consumers, sugar has long been a part of our diets.
As a result, imposing higher tax should only be applied for food that has
unacceptable sugar content.
4. In this area, technology has replaced a lot of humans
at work. Why? What are the solutions?
INTRO: In this day and age, many occupations have been replaced by
technological advancements, increasing the unemployment rate. In
this essay, I would explain the reasons leading to this tendency before
proposing some effective solutions.
MAIN 1: There are some major reasons that explain why technology
has replaced many humans at work. First, machines have the ability to
function continuously without the need of break time, which is an
inevitable requirement for human workers. Second, technological
advancements have equipped machines with the ability to make
decisions, moderate their actions, and improve the accuracy
level (nâng cao độ chính xác) to a point that can not be matched
by humans (con người k thể sáng bằng). Thus, many jobs have
been replaced, and the tendency does not show any sign of
stopping (cho thấy k có dấu hiệu dừng lại)
MAIN 2: (Solutions)
Despite the severity of this development, governmental
intervention along with raising the awareness of each individual
could effectively mitigate it. There should be a regulation from the
government to better protect the benefits of employees, ones that are
prone to (có nguy cơ) be replaced by technology. The government
should require a specific number of human workers at a factory site,
acting a supervisor of machinery works. Also, each citizen must equip
themselves with sufficient knowledge to better adapt to changes
brought about by (gây ra bởi) technology, which could help them
find jobs in novel job markets (thị trường lao động mới), such as
computer science or machinery design.
In conclusion, many people are losing their jobs due to the higher level
of efficiency and effectiveness (hiệu suất và hiệu quả) that
technological advancements have brought about. However, the
government can still mitigate this by issuing new regulations (ban
hành quy định) to protect workers’ benefits and provide more
education for people to find employment opportunities in novel job
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Nowadays, more and more older people who need
employment have to compete with younger people for
the same jobs. What problems does this cause? What
solutions are there?
In this day and age, an increasing number of older individuals who
need a job must compete with younger workers for the same
occupation opportunities. In this essay, I would evaluate this issues
that can caused by this development before proposing some effective
solutions.
- Problems khi người lớn tuổi cạnh tranh với những cái jobs
của người trẻ tuổi
- Đâu là đối tượng bị ảnh hưởng trước: ng trẻ/ ng lớn/ cti
+ Ng trẻ: momentum (đà phát triển), cạnh tranh với ng
nhiều kinh nghiệm => phải làm các cv k tối ưu, tạm bợ.
+ Ng già: cạnh tranh những cvc mà cvc đó phù hợp với giới
trẻ => do nghèo, cannot afford to stop working
The first problem is that it blocks the normal path into employment
for young people. Many of the jobs in question (những jobs
đang xét đến) are likely to be the ones through which younger
workers gain their first real experience, learns workplace habits, and
begin building long term careers. If these roles are increasingly
taken by older applicants with greater experience, younger people
may spend too long in temporary or insecure work and fall behind
at the very stage when momentum matters most (đà phát triển
đang là quan trọng nhất)
At the same time, the situation is also damaging for older workers.
Many of them are not applying for these jobs because the roles
genuinely suit their age or experience, but because they cannot
afford to stop working. This means that labour market starts to
waste both group in different ways. One is prevented from entering
properly, while the other is pushed into work below their level
simply to remain financially afloat (duy trì tài chính)
(Solution)
- Thay đổi phải mang tính cấu trúc/ hệ thống chứ k chỉ là bề
mặt: Structure – structural / superficial
- Làm sao để người lớn kp đi cạnh tranh: pension systems/
retirement support
- Cty – người sd lđ – employers: mở ra thêm cvc cho ng lớn
tuổi: cố vấn – advisory roles- lighter duties/ retraining/ part
time work
- Mô hình thực tập- apprenticeship schemes/ protect entry
routes for young people
The solutions therefore need to be structural rather than superficial.
Government should strengthen pension systems and retirement
support so that older people are not forced into unsuitable
employment out of necessity alone (chỉ vì lý do thực dụng).
Employers, meanwhile, should as advisory roles, lighter duties,
retraining, or part time work that makes better use of experience
without forcing older workers into direct competition for entry level
jobs (cvc cho ng ms). At the other end of the market,
apprenticeship schemes and protect entry routes for younger
people are equally important, because they preserve a clear path
into employment.
In conclusion,