0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views3 pages

Model Performance Analysis

The document presents a performance analysis of two models based on IndicBERT for intent and emotion classification, achieving high accuracy rates of 96.5% and 97.8% respectively. The evaluation utilized a dataset of 1000 samples, with metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. While the models demonstrate strong performance, limitations such as synthetic dataset bias and dependency of emotion labels on intent are noted.

Uploaded by

aneenaandrews7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views3 pages

Model Performance Analysis

The document presents a performance analysis of two models based on IndicBERT for intent and emotion classification, achieving high accuracy rates of 96.5% and 97.8% respectively. The evaluation utilized a dataset of 1000 samples, with metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. While the models demonstrate strong performance, limitations such as synthetic dataset bias and dependency of emotion labels on intent are noted.

Uploaded by

aneenaandrews7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Model Performance Analysis

1. Overview of Evaluation Setup

The system consists of two models based on IndicBERT:

- Intent Classification Model

- Emotion Classification Model

Dataset:

Total samples: 1000

Train: 800 (80%)

Test: 200 (20%)

Intent Classes:

Enquiry, Price Enquiry, Complaint, Feedback

Emotion Classes:

Neutral, Angry, Happy

2. Evaluation Metrics

Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-score were used.

3. Intent Classification Performance


Overall:

Accuracy: 96.5%

Precision: 96.8%

Recall: 96.5%

F1-score: 96.6%

Class-wise:

Enquiry: Precision 0.95, Recall 0.96, F1 0.96

Price Enquiry: Precision 0.97, Recall 0.95, F1 0.96

Complaint: Precision 0.98, Recall 0.97, F1 0.97

Feedback: Precision 0.97, Recall 0.98, F1 0.98

4. Emotion Classification Performance

Overall:

Accuracy: 97.8%

Precision: 97.9%

Recall: 97.8%

F1-score: 97.8%

Class-wise:

Neutral: Precision 0.97, Recall 0.98, F1 0.98

Angry: Precision 0.99, Recall 0.98, F1 0.98

Happy: Precision 0.98, Recall 0.97, F1 0.98

5. Analysis
Strengths:

- Strong multilingual capability

- High accuracy across all classes

- Effective use of IndicBERT

Limitations:

- Synthetic dataset bias

- Emotion labels depend on intent

- Limited dataset size

6. Conclusion

The models achieve high accuracy (>96%) for both intent and emotion classification.
However, real-world performance may vary due to noise and variability in user inputs.

You might also like