0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views12 pages

Pcs 008

The document outlines the design principles for shear and torsion in prestressed concrete structures, specifically detailing four distinct zones of behavior in a beam. It describes the characteristics of each zone, the failure mechanisms, and the equations for calculating shear resistance and reinforcement requirements based on the conditions of the beam. The guidelines are based on the Hong Kong Concrete Code and include considerations for inclined tendons and shear reinforcement specifications.

Uploaded by

七封神
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views12 pages

Pcs 008

The document outlines the design principles for shear and torsion in prestressed concrete structures, specifically detailing four distinct zones of behavior in a beam. It describes the characteristics of each zone, the failure mechanisms, and the equations for calculating shear resistance and reinforcement requirements based on the conditions of the beam. The guidelines are based on the Hong Kong Concrete Code and include considerations for inclined tendons and shear reinforcement specifications.

Uploaded by

七封神
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PCS/008

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG


Department of Civil Engineering
CIVL3012 / 3112 Prestressed Concrete Structures

Design for Shear and Torsion


Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013

Design for Shear


Demarcation of Zones

Four different zones may be distinguished in a prestressed concrete beam (Figures 1 and 2)
for the purpose of designing shear reinforcement. The characteristics of the four zones,
designated A to D, are as follows:

Zone A: In a simply supported beam, this zone extends to a distance d from the supports.
This region remains crack-free up to failure.
Zone B: In this zone, the shear cracks develop within the web, when the principal tensile
stress exceeds the tensile strength of the concrete. The cracks, following the principal stress
(tension) trajectories are inclined at 20 to 30. These cracks are generally referred to as web-
shear cracks.
Zone C: In this zone of high bending moment, vertical flexural cracks are at first formed;
with further increase in the load, they penetrate the beam and become inclined at 40 to 70.
Zone D: In this zone where bending moment is dominant and shear is insignificant, only
vertical flexural cracks are formed and shear failure can be ruled out.

Zones A B C B A

Figure 1. Zones of different behaviour

Shear span Zone D Shear span


V
M/Vh>7: no danger of shear failure
Figure 2. Rectangular beam: ratio M/Vh>7

It is convenient to merge regions A and B and regard the combined regions as the zone of
web-shear cracking. Region C, the zone of flexural-shear cracking, needs separate treatment.
In Hong Kong Concrete Code, the shear-carrying capacity of the concrete in the region A-B is
designated as Vco and the shear carrying capacity of concrete in Region C is designated as Vcr.

Figure 3 summarizes various failure modes of a beam. Note that not all three kinds of failure
modes occur in one beam.

1
PCS/008
L/2 CL
b

+
h

Web shear Flexural shear Flexural


Section cracking cracking cracking

Flexural cracking
moment Mcr
Bending
moment
diagram

for small L/d for large L/d

Check web Check flexural Check flexural


shear strength shear strength strength
Vco Vcr; check also
Vco for thin web

Figure 3. Summary of failure modes of a beam

Three failure mechanisms can be identified:


1. Web shear cracking: It originates at the centroidal axis and propagates towards both edges
at an inclined angle.
2. Flexural shear cracking: It originates at the bottom and propagates upwards and then
becoming inclined.
3. Flexural cracking: It originates at the bottom and propagates upwards.

Breadth of rib bv
Where a duct occurs in a rib, the value of bv should be reduced by the size of the duct if
ungrouted and by 2/3 of the size if grouted.

Section uncracked in flexure (M < Mcr; often simply taken as M < Mo in design codes)

In the region where the bending moment is less than that causing flexural cracking, diagonal
cracks may develop in the web under the action of the principal tensile stress.
vco ft f c'
+
fc fc

fcp fc'
vco vco
vco   45
- ft
An element at
Stress distribution centroidal axis Principal stresses
Figure 4. Stresses at centroidal axis

2
PCS/008

The principal tensile stress is given by 


2
fc f 
ft     c   vco2 (1) (-fc, vco)
2  2
2 >90
(ft, 0)
The shear stress vco is the maximum at the
(-f c’, 0)  (tensile as
centroidal axis for a rectangular section (or positive)
a web of flanged section). Taking the case
of rectangular section as representative, the (0, -vco)

maximum shear stress is given by


Figure 5. Mohr circle for stresses at centroidal axis
V Ay
vco  co
I bv
bv
V (b h / 2)(h / 4)
 co v 3
(bv h / 12)(bv )
3 Vco h Max
 (2)
2 bv h
where Vco is the ultimate shear resistance of
Section Shear stress
the section uncracked in flexure.
Figure 6. Assumed shear stress distribution

Substituting equation (2) into (1)


2
 f  3 V 
2
f
f t   c   c     co 
2  2   2 bv h 
2
f   f  3 V 
2 2

 f t  c    c     co 
 2   2   2 bv h 
2
 f   f  3 V 
2 2

f t  f t f c   c    c     co 
2

 2   2   2 bv h 
2
Vco  bv h f t 2  f t f c
3
Vco  0.67bv h f t 2  f t f c (3)

Assumptions in Hong Kong Concrete Code:


1. Maximum design principal tensile stress f t  0.24 f cu
A partial factor of safety of 1.5 has already been incorporated.
2. Only 80% of compressive stress in concrete at centroidal axis due to prestress can be taken
into account, i.e. f c  0.8 f cp

Therefore equation (3) becomes


Vco  0.67bv h f t 2  0.8 f cp f t (4)
This is the shear resistance of the section uncracked in flexure.

3
PCS/008

Effects of inclined tendon


Near the end of the beam, the tendons may be inclined. The vertical component of the
prestressing force should be combined with the shear due to loading.
w
Total shear force at concrete section
 V  Pe sin  R (a) R

w
If V  Pe sin   Vco , the section is OK; w
V
otherwise it has to be reinforced for shear. R
(b) 

Maximum shear stress Pe


R (c)
The principal compressive stress may cause
web buckling if the web is thin. In order to Figure 7. (a) A typical beam; (b) effects of live load; and
prevent this, the maximum shear stress (c) effects of inclined tendon
carried by the beam is limited to 0.8fcu
irrespective of the amount of shear
reinforcement, or 7.0N/mm2, whichever is
the lesser.

The maximum possible shear resistance for rectangular or flanged beams is


(maximum shear stress)bv d

Section cracked in flexure (M > Mcr; often simply taken as M > Mo in design codes)

In the region that is cracked in flexure, the flexural cracks may propagate towards the loading
point, gradually becoming inclined cracks (i.e. flexural-shear cracks). The crack causing
failure usually lies at a distance of half the effective depth from the loading point (or point of
maximum moment).
av = M/V V

yt

yb
Pe

O O’
V
d/2

Figure 8. A typical flexural-shear crack

The shear strength of the section is equal to the shear force present at flexural cracking Vo
plus the additional shear force carried by the cracked section Va, i.e.
Vcr  Vo  Va (5)

The moment Mcr causing flexural cracking at point O is given by


M cr  M o  f r I yb  (6)

4
PCS/008

where
Mo = moment necessary to produce zero stress in the concrete at the extreme tension fibre
 0.8 f bp I yb  (allowing 80% only to play safe)
fbp = stress due to prestress only at the extreme tension fibre
fr = flexural tensile strength of concrete (modulus of rupture) = 0.37 f cu N/mm2

 M cr  M o  0.37 f cu I yb  (7)

From equilibrium at the section at point O,


M cr
Vo  (8)
av  d / 2

For simplicity in design, the moment and shear at point O may be taken as those at point O’.
M
Vo  cr
av
Mo  I 
  0.37 f cu  
av  yb av 
M V  I 
 o  0.37 f cu   (9)
M  yb av 

In practice, beams which fail in flexural-shear have an av/h lying between 2.5 and 6. Taking
an average value of 4, i.e. av  4h , equation (9) becomes
V  I 
Vo  M o  0.37 f cu   (10)
M  4hyb 

Assuming only the web taking all the shear, yb  h / 2 and h  d ,

Vo  M o
V
 0.37 f cu  v

 b h3 12  

M  (4h)(h / 2) 
V b d 
 Mo  0.37 f cu  v 
M  24 
 0.015 f cu bv d 
V
Vo  M o (11)
M

The additional shear force carried by the cracked section before failure Va is dependent on the
concrete strength. Test results indicate that
Va  0.037 f cu bv d (12)

From equations (11) and (12),


Vcr  Vo  Va

 0.015 f cu bv d   0.037 f cu bv d 


V
 Mo
M

5
PCS/008

Vcr  0.052 f cu bv d   M o


V
(13)
M

To account for the degree of prestressing, modify equation (13) to


 f  V
Vcr  1  k pe  vc bv d  M o (14)
 f pu  M

where
vc = design concrete shear stress for the section without prestress from Table 6.3 of Hong
Kong Concrete Code (dependent on strength of concrete, amount of prestressed and non-
prestressed steel Aps+As and effective depth of section d); and
k = a constant to be determined.

Comparing equations (13) and (14),


 f 
1  k pe vc  0.052 f cu
 f pu 

Taking fpe / fpu=0.6 (maximum in practice), fcu=50N/mm2 and assuming vc=0.55 N/mm2,
(1  0.6k )(0.55)  (0.052) 50
 k  0.55
 f  V
 Vcr  1  0.55 pe  vc bv d  M o
 f pu  M

The equation is not necessarily accurate because so many assumptions are involved. Test
results also indicate that the shear strength of a section cracked in flexure is not less than
0.1 f cu bv d . Therefore
 f  V
Vcr  1  0.55 pe  vc bv d  M o  0.1 f cu bv d (15)
 
f pu  M

Note that the vertical component of prestressing force due to inclination of tendons is
considered only if it increases the shear effects.

Shear reinforcement

Asv sv

d

Figure 9. Shear reinforcement

6
PCS/008

Shear force carried by links


f yv
Vs  Asv  no. of links crossed by cracks
m
where fyv = characteristic strength of shear reinforcement
f yv d
Vs  Asv 
 m sv
Asv Vs Vs
  
sv  f yv  m  d 0.87 f yv d (16)

Vc = the lesser of Vco and Vcr.

Provided that V  Vc, cases not requiring shear reinforcement are:


 V  0.5Vc;
 in members of minor importance; or
 where tests have shown that shear reinforcement is not required.

For the provision of shear reinforcement, the design shear resistance of the section with
minimum links Vr is defined as:
Vr  0.4 bv d for f cu  40 N/mm2
Vr  0.4  f cu 40  bv d for f cu  40 N/mm2
23

Two cases are possible.

Case 1: V  Vc  Vr
Asv Vr
 (17)
sv 0.87 f yv d

Case 2: V  Vc  Vr
Asv V  Vc
 (18)
sv 0.87 f yv d t
where dt is depth from the extreme compression fibre either to the longitudinal bars or to the
centroid of the tendons, whichever is the greater.

The spacing of links, sv, should not exceed the following:


 0.75 dt
 4 bv (for flanged beams; before deduction for duct)
 0.5 dt if V > 1.8 Vc

Lateral spacing of individual legs of links  dt

7
PCS/008

Estimation of breadth of section


Bt

dt Initial prestress Effective prestress

0 0
h bw h  0.12 fcu

db
b Bb 0.4 fci  0.32 fcu 0.80.32 fcu  0.24 fcu
Figure 11. Assumed stresses
Figure 10. Common sections
The breadth of a section, in particular, the breadth of the web of a flanged beam, is governed
by shear requirement. If web-shear cracking is to be avoided, the section must be so chosen
that
2 2
0.8 f cp  0.8 f cp   3 V 
ft         
2  2   2 bv h 
2 2 2
 0.8 f cp   0.8 f cp   3 V 
 f t       
 2   2   2 bv h 
2 2
 0.8 f cp   0.8 f cp  9 V 2
f t  0.8 f t f cp  
2
      2 2
 2   2  4 bv h
9 V2 1
bv2   2  2
4 h f t  0.8 f t f cp

Assuming f cp  0.12 f cu , f t  0.24 f cu and f cu  50 , we have


9 V2 1
bv2   
4 h 2 0.24 f 
cu   (0.8)0.24
2

f cu (0.12 f cu )
9 V2 1
  2 
4 h 0.0576 f cu  0.023 f cu f cu
9 V2 1
  2 
4 h 0.220 f cu
V2 V
bv2  10.2  bv  3.2
h 2 f cu h f cu
bv V
  3.2 2 (19)
h h f cu

If the tendons are inclined, the vertical component of the prestressing force contributes
approximately 1/3 of the shear strength. Hence
bv V
 2.2 2 (20)
h h f cu

8
PCS/008

Design for torsion

Equilibrium torsion and compatibility torsion


Most design codes implicitly differentiate between two types of torsion: equilibrium torsion
(or primary torsion), which is required to maintain equilibrium in the structure, and
compatibility torsion (or secondary torsion), which is required to maintain compatibility
between members of the structure. To distinguish between the two types, it is helpful to note
that (a) in a statically determinate structure, only equilibrium torsion can exist; (b) in an
indeterminate structure both types may exist, but if the torsion can be eliminated by releasing
redundant restraints then it is a compatibility torsion. In general, where the torsional
resistance or stiffness of members has not been explicitly taken into account in the analysis of
the structure, no specific calculations for torsion will be necessary.

Torsion in plain concrete beams


Figure 12 shows a plain concrete beam subjected to pure torsion. The torsional moment T
induces shear stresses which produce principal tensile stresses at 45 to the longitudinal axis.
When the maximum tensile stress reaches the tensile strength of the concrete, diagonal cracks
form which tend to spiral round the beam. For a plain concrete beam, failure immediately
follows such diagonal cracking.

Figure 12. Diagonal crack due to torsion Figure 13. Sand heap for rectangular section

Membrane analogy for elastic torsion:


If a thin membrane is mounted over the cross-section and inflated by pressure, then St
Venant’s torsion constant K is proportional to the volume under the membrane surface, and
the torsional shear stress vt in any specified direction at any point on the section is
proportional to the slope of the membrane at that point, the slope being measured in a
direction perpendicular to that of vt.

Sand-heap analogy for plastic torsion:


If the torque T produces complete plasticity, then vt is everywhere equal to the yield strength
in shear assuming, for the time being, that an elastic-perfectly plastic material is being
considered. The sand-heap analogy (or sand-hill analogy) states that the torsion constant K is
twice the volume of the sand heap, provided that the yield shear stress vt is interpreted at (T/K)
times the slope  of the faces. Figure 13 shows the sand heap for a rectangular section. It
can be verified that
2T
vt  2 (21)
hmin hmax  hmin 3

Figure 14 shows the approximate sand heaps for simple flanged sections.

9
PCS/008

Figure 14. Approximate sand heaps for simple flanged sections

If the local changes in shape near the ends and intersections are neglected, it is easy to show
that the partial torque resisted by a typical component rectangle is

Ti  T
 2
hmin hmax i
(22)
 hmin hmax
2

where the suffix i refers to the typical component rectangle, and hmin and hmax are respectively
the shorter and longer sides of the rectangle.

In practice, T, L or I sections are divided into component rectangles in such a way as to


3
maximise hmin hmax . The torsional shear stress vt carried by each component rectangle may be
calculated by treating it as a rectangular section subjected to a torsional moment of
h3 h 
Ti  T min3 max i (23)
 hmin hmax
This approach is largely based on the elastic distribution of torsional stress in order to avoid
premature failure at service.

Effects of torsion reinforcement


The most practical arrangement of torsion
reinforcement consists of a combination of
longitudinal bars and links, the longitudinal
bars being distributed evenly round the
inside perimeter of the links, as shown in
Figure 15. In the “space truss analogy” for
evaluation of the ultimate torsional strength,
the space truss consists of the longitudinal
bars acting as stringers, the legs of the links
acting as posts, and the concrete between Figure 15. Space truss analogy
the cracks as the compression diagonals.

Let T = ultimate torsional moment of resistance;


As = total area of longitudinal reinforcement;
Asv = area of the two legs of each link;
fy = yield strength of the longitudinal reinforcement;
fyv = yield strength of the links;
sv = longitudinal spacing of the links;
x1 = the smaller dimension between the corner bars; and
y1 = the larger dimension between the corner bars.

10
PCS/008

It is desirable that the longitudinal bars and the links should yield simultaneously. To
achieve this condition, the volume-strength products should be made equal. Considering a
length sv of the beam,
As f y s v  Asv f yv  x1  y1  (24)
It has been found that if the above equation is satisfied, then the diagonal cracks can be
assumed to be inclined at 45 to the axis of the member. It is assumed that the member is
torsionally under-reinforced so that at failure the links intersected by the diagonal cracks
yield in tension. Using the space truss model with 45 diagonals, it may be shown that
A
T  sv f yv x1 y1 (25)
sv

Introducing the efficiency factor of 0.8 and the partial factor of safety for material, the
detailing rules for the closed links and longitudinal reinforcement become
Asv T
 (26)
sv 0.8 x1 y1 (0.87 f yv )
Asv  f yv 
As    x  y1  (27)
sv  f  1
 y 

Note that closed links as shown in Figure 16 have to be used.

For further details, refer to “Reinforced and Prestressed


Concrete, F.K. Kong & R.H. Evans, 3rd edition, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, 1987”.
Figure 16.
A closed link

11
PCS/008

Torsional Resistance in Design Calculations (Hong Kong Concrete Code)

1. The torsional moment T


In a statically determinate structure, the torsional moment T due to ultimate loads will
be given directly by statics. In analysing a statically indeterminate structure to
determine T, appropriate values of flexural rigidity EI and torsional rigidity GC should
be adopted based on the code.

2. Torsional shear stress vt


For a rectangular section, the torsional shear stress vt may be calculated from

vt  2T hmin
2

hmax  hmin 3 where hmin and hmax are the smaller and larger dimensions
of the section respectively.
T-, L- or I-sections may be treated by dividing them into their component rectangles.
This should normally be done so as to maximize the function  hmin3
hmax  which will
generally be achieved if the widest rectangle is made as long as possible. The torsional
shear stress vt carried by each component rectangle may be calculated by treating it as a
rectangular section subjected to a torsional moment of Ti  T hmin
3
hmax i  hmin
3
hmax

Box and hollow sections in which wall thicknesses exceed one-quarter of the overall
thickness of the member in the direction of measurement may be treated as solid
rectangular sections; otherwise the torsional shear stress vt can be calculated as
vt  T 2hw0 A0 where hw0 is the wall thickness where the stress is determined; and A0 is
the area enclosed by the median wall line.

3. Torsional shear stresses vtu and vtmin


In no case should the sum of the shear stresses resulting from shear force and torsion
(v+vt) exceed the maximum combined shear stress (shear plus torsion) vtu, nor in the
case of small sections (where y1<550mm) should the torsional shear stress vt exceed
vtu y1 550 . Where the torsional shear stress vt exceeds minimum torsional shear stress
vtmin, reinforcement should be provided.

4. Torsional reinforcement
Torsional reinforcement should consist of rectangular closed links together with
longitudinal reinforcement. This reinforcement is additional to any requirements for
shear or bending and should be such that
A  f yv 
A
Rectangular sections: sv 
T
; As  sv  x1  y1 
sv 0.8 x1 y1 (0.87 f yv ) sv  f y 
Ast T A A  f 
Box sections (BS5400: Part 4):  ; sL  st  yv 
sv 2 A0 (0.87 f yv ) sL sv  f yL 
where Ast is the area of one leg of a closed link at a section; AsL is the area of one bar of
longitudinal reinforcement; fyL is the characteristic strength of the longitudinal
reinforcement; and sL is the spacing of the longitudinal reinforcement.

12

You might also like