Chapter II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter includes the review of related literature and studies which the
researchers have to shed light on the topic under study, furthermore it is composed of
discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related.
LOCAL LITERATURE
The physical environment in schools is an important factor that benefits the
educational quality and has an essential role in the student’s learning process. In the
Philippines, the physical environment is underdeveloped in the schools, since the main
focus is on developing a basic foundation and on making sure that every child can go to
school. The classroom environment in the Philippines has been found to have a significant
impact on students’ academic performance. Studies have shown that a flipped classroom
environment enhances academic achievement and self-efficacy of students. According to
Villanueva (2001) the classroom learning environment has been found to have a moderating
influence on teachers’ creativity and students academic stability.
Classroom environment and temperature play crucial roles in shaping the
academic performance of learners in the Philippines. According to the research of Afalla
(2011), indicates that when teachers prioritize the physical classroom condition, students
feel more relaxed and perform better academically. Additionally, classroom temperature
variations can be impact students’ cognitive capabilities and autonomic profile, with higher
temperatures leading to reduced cognitive performance and thermal discomfort (Barbic,
2008). The classroom learning environment acts as a mediator between teachers’ creativity
and students’ academic stability, showing significant relationships among these factors.
While there may be not be a high correlation between indoor temperature and academic
performance, slight declines in academic performance at low temperatures have been
observed, especially among late-teen students.
A well-designed physical environment, including adequate lighting, comfortable
seating, and appropriate classroom resources, can positively impact student engagement and
performance. Creating a culturally responsive classroom in the Philippines where diverse
cultural backgrounds and perspectives are respected and integrated into teaching practices,
promotes a sense of belonging and motivation among students. Implementing effective
instructional practices, such as differentiated instruction and active learning strategies, can
enhance student engagement and learning outcomes in the Philippines. Integrating
technology into the classroom environment in the Philippines can enhance learning
outcomes when used effectively (Marzano, 2011).
FOREIGN LITERATURE
The classroom environment plays a crucial role in shaping students’ learning
engagement and overall academic success. Research by Barrett (2013) suggests that well-
designed classroom with appropriate lighting, seating arrangements, and temperature
control can positively influence student engagement and academic performance. The
physical characteristics of a child’s learning environment can affect health, well-being and
educational progress. All learning conditions (class group , teaching personnel, etc.) were
held constant throughout, while physical environment was alternated term-by-term using a
portable, sound-treated dividing wall.
Active learning strategies, such as group work, discussions, and hands-on
activities, promote deeper conceptual understanding and retention of knowledge compared
to traditional lecture-based instruction (Freeman et. al.,2014).
In various literature reviews, Fraser (1991) suggests that there are three general
approaches to the assessment of learning environments: (1) the use of trained observes to
code events, usually in terms of explicit phenomena; (2) the use of student and teacher
perceptions obtained through questionnaire administration; and (3) the use of ethnographic
data collection methods. In general, the first two approaches have relied on quantitative
data collection methods and statistical analyses. Indeed, classroom environment research
has a history of psychometric approaches employing cross sectional ex post factor research
designs. The development of a classroom environment involves deliberate efforts to create a
space that is conducive to learning, growth, and well-being. According to Bressler, D.M.
(2009), to set clear expectations, establish clear and consistent expectations for behavior,
participation, and academic standards. Communication these expectations to students and
involve them in the process to foster a sense of ownership.
Background noise also affects non-auditory (cognitive) functions. Importantly, the
nature or content of the competing signal plays a significant role in the degree of disruption.
In children, this effect on short term memory is even more pronounced and has been
attributed to two distinct mechanisms. Firstly, competing sounds that change over time
capture the listener’s attention if the signal is particularly salient such as significant words,
Elliot (2012). The presence of background noise can also have marked effects on the
performance of academic tasks in school-aged children especially when the masker
involves meaningful speech. According to Dockrell (2010) chronic exposure to high levels
of background noise affects all aspects of classroom performance. Negative correlations
have been demonstrated between classroom noise levels and the development of cognitive
skills such as attention, concentration and memory and as a result, overall academic
progress may be impacted.
REVIEW OF RELATED STUDIES
LOCAL STUDIES
Through a conceptual framework focused on student engagement, this article
explores students' perceptions about the impact the design of learning environments has on
student engagement. The current mixed-methods study was conducted at two Texas
replacement elementary schools where the entire learning community, all teachers,
administrators, staff, and students, moved from an old building to a new building. Through
the qualitative component of the study, student focus groups, the study explores the
attributes of design and spaces that students value and perceive as having an impact on their
learning and engagement. Students' perceptions demonstrate that learning environments
impact student engagement (Oliveras Ortiz).
Classroom environment seems to be an important motivating factor that makes the
teaching and learning process enjoyable. The quality of teaching and learning will become
evident in every learning institution when proper facilities and instructional materials are
provided. The presence of these facilities and instructional will enable the students to be
more comfortable which may contribute to a better academic performance in the class. A
well equipped classroom will not only affect the learners but also the teacher’s attitude in
the class. This study aimed to determine the effects and relationship of classroom
environment to the academic performance of students of the College of Teacher Education.
The descriptive correlational method was used in this research study employing
correlational treatment of the data to establish the relationship that exists between the
classroom environment and the academic performance. The respondents of the study are
students of the College of Education of the Cagayan State University – as the main data
source. The student-respondents were randomly chosen. A questionnaire which was
patterned from the study of Collado, et. al was the devise used to gather the data and was
designed to elicit necessary information regarding the effect of classroom environment on
the academic performance of the student-respondents. The questionnaire consists of two
parts the first part consists of the personal profile of the respondents while the second part
delved on the variables of classroom environment. On the basis of the findings of the study,
it is concluded that the classroom environment has a significant influence on the student's
academic performance and therefore, the researcher strongly recommends that the
government and school administration should improve the condition of the classroom by
providing adequate facilities necessary for a comfortable and conducive place for learners.
A research by Sunday (2012) revealed that there is a significant relationship between
physical school environment and student's academic performance in senior secondary
school physics. To him, the physical school environment has some influences on student's
academic achievement in senior secondary school physics. The physical facilities, human
resources, and the relationship among them determine the physical environment of the
school. The result indicated that students with adequate laboratory facilities in physics
perform better than those in school with less or without facilities, this is simply because
laboratory forms part in enriching the physical school environment. It was also discovered
that poor facilities and inadequate space, as well school environment of items including
seats in the classroom, library and laboratory would affect the organization of learning
environment. Favorable school climate gives room for students to work hard and improve
their academic achievement. A research by Sunday, A.A (2012) revealed that there is a
significant relationship between physical school environment and students' academic
performance in senior secondary school physics. To him, the physical school environment
has some influences on students' academic achievement in senior secondary school physics.
The physical facilities, human resources, and the relationship among them determine the
physical environment of the school. The result indicated that students with adequate
laboratory facilities in physics perform better than those in school with less or without
facilities, this simply because laboratory forms part enrich the physical school environment.
It was also discovered that poor facilities and inadequate space, as well as the arrangement
of items including seats in the classroom, library and laboratory would affect the
organization of learning environment. Favorable school climate gives room for students to
work hard and enhance their academic achievement.
Orlu, C. (2013) conducted a research among six hundred teachers and students with
the aim to find out environmental influence on the academic performance of secondary
school students in Port Harcourt local government area of river state. The result of this
research indicated that the school environment has a significant influence on the academic
performance. For example, when a school is sited in a noisy area like an airport or in the
heart of a city where activities disrupt the teaching-learning of the student. One will not
expect such students in this area to be doing well academically. Noise in anything interferes
with teaching-learning process. However, the physical structure of the school building and
the interactions between teachers and students also influence students' performance. School
climate can be a positive influence on the health of the learning environment or a
significant barrier to learning. The school environment can affect many areas and people
within schools. For example, a positive school climate has been associated with fewer
behavioral and emotional problems for students. Therefore it is believed that a positive
interpersonal relationship and optional learning opportunities for students for smooth
running of academic activities which results in good academic performance. Suleman and
Hussain (2014) reported that studies in on the classroom environment revealed that physical
environment plays a vital role in the teaching- learning process. It can affect the
performance of both teachers and students. The classroom environment includes many
different facets. The environment can include the placement of tables and chairs, lighting
and temperature, classroom management, discipline techniques, and engaging lesson plans.
FOREIGN STUDIES
Interaction with peers and instructors also lends itself to engagement of students in the
class. Trowler (2010) conducted a review of the student engagement literature and
identified a definition of student engagement that is prevalent in the literature as follows:
Student engagement is concerned with the interaction between the time, effort, and other
relevant resources invested by both students and their institutions intended to optimize the
student experience and enhance the learning outcomes and development of students and the
performance, and reputation of the institution. Student engagement includes several
components: “student feedback, student representation, student approaches to learning,
institutional organization, learning spaces, architectural design and learning development”
(Trowler, 2010).
According to Trowler (2010), several attempts have been implemented to increase
student engagement. One such attempt is the inclusion of surveys to find out effectiveness
of student engagement strategies. The act of surveying students has received support, in
particular, to accommodate and encourage students who tend to be hesitant to engage
actively to give authentic feedback. Although this may have a positive impact for some, this
strategy does not promote social engagement with others and interaction which, according
to Vygotsky, is critical for achievement (Coates, 2005; Shabani, 2016).
One method for increasing student engagement in the classroom is to develop
learning communities, where students are engaged in “educationally purposeful activities
inside and outside of the classroom” to increase student learning and personal development
as well as “an indicator if educational effectiveness” (Zhao & Kuh, 2004). Learning
communities are just one strategy for increasing student engagement. Other strategies are
often directly related to the design of the classroom itself such as architecture and learning
spaces (Trowler, 2010). Young, Young, and Beyer (2017) compared a traditional classroom
environment with classes taught in an auditorium. Students had difficulty hearing their
peers in the larger setting and were not engaged with peers when in an auditorium, which is
often used for a traditional learning environment (Young, Young & Beyer, 2017). When
small groups were assigned, students were dissatisfied with the amount of time and effort it
took to organize into these groups, and working with partners, where students was
challenging, with an awkwardness in engaging with a partner in the auditorium
environment (Young, et al., 2017). Students indicated that they preferred the smaller class
environment which was noted to be more intimate and allowed for stronger focus and
comprehension of the content (Young et al., 2017). Finally, the authors concluded that,
although the environment alone did not have a measurable quantitative impact, the
qualitative impact is more worthy of more in‐depth study and examination (Young, [Link],
2017), perpetuating the need for the current study. Classrooms that are designed to
“encourage student interaction and facilitate active or team‐based collaborative learning by
including features such as round tables, movable chairs, student laptop connections for
sharing work on overhead projectors and tableside whiteboards” (Cotner, Loper, Walker, &
Brooks, 2013, p. 82) have been cited as innovative and meeting student need. Students who
were assigned to the active learning classrooms (ALCs) performed to a higher level
academically than those who were assigned to traditional classrooms (Cotner, et al, 2013).
In addition, The ALCs facilitated more group interaction and placed less weight on the role
of the instructor and the conclusion revealed that the investment in ALCs was worthwhile
(Cotner, et al., 2013).
Herman Miller Associates, in an effort to increase student engagement and thus
improve student performance, has created and marketed classroom arrangements designed
to this end. Using concepts such as innovation, collaboration, and mobility as foundations
to their work, classroom spaces are designed to enhance opportunities for students to
engage in discussion about what they are learning, relate the content to personal experience
and apply the new information to their lives. In this design, furniture is easily mobile and
technology is richly available in the environment to enable students more freedom of
interaction. Many components serve multiple purposes in this environment, for example,
large white boards are used as space dividers as well as their intended function. Results of
one faculty and student survey revealed that faculty “rated highly the ability of the space to
teach students to take learning into their own hands. Teachers and students alike have a
hand in shaping the learning environment”. Additionally, students reported that the
“furnishings and environment communicated to them a level of professionalism, trust, and
value that traditional classrooms did not” (Herman Miller, 2008).