Introducing Neely River Trading Technology:

A Paradigm Shift in Market Trading

An interview series with Glenn Neely,
Part 2 of 3

Interviewer: Hello, traders. This is Bud Fox from [Link]. Today, again I
have the privilege to have the well-respected expert Glenn Neely on
NEoWave and Neely River theory here with me. This is the second part
of our interview regarding Neely River Trading Technology. In our last
discussion, we covered the focus. Neely River theory has three different
types of traders, and how to trade the market depends on whichever trader
is dominating the market at the time. Today we are going deeper into
exactly how Neely River theory works.

Glenn Neely: I’ll go into some different aspects of it and make some interesting
comparisons to Wave theory, which will probably be very intriguing to
most people. I would like to pick up a little bit about where we left off
from the last interview to bring people up to speed. Then we can move on
a little bit.

Interviewer: Sure. Please go ahead.

Glenn Neely: Last time, we talked about the comparison of water flowing through a
river with gravity being the primary force – and prices moving through a
market with money being the primary force. I had shown two different
charts, one showing fluid dynamics in a river.

Then I compared that to the three zones that this creates in a river. We
have a wave of turbulence near the north bank, a wave of turbulence near
the south bank and more directional action near the middle of a river.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 1 of 15

 We had taken that information and compared it to the idea of money
flowing through a market, producing up and down price action, and how
you also have similar turbulent price action near the top of the market’s
channel and the bottom of a channel and more directional price action
toward the middle of the channel.

Just about anybody can see this kind of behavior on a chart just by looking
over it for a short period of time. It’s very common for markets to chop
around and oscillate a lot near major tops and bottoms and trend much
better toward the middle of the movement. It’s very similar to the way
water moves through a river.

It’s a similar idea. Over time, this idea started to make me realize that the
way price action behaves is dependent not only on where you are in a river
but who is in charge of the trend.

The different controlling elements on the market are trend traders, those
who buy in the strength and sell in the weakness and top and bottom
pickers, those who sell near the high or buy near the low, just the opposite
are the trend followers.

Then there are bargain hunters who really don’t try to get in at the top or
the bottom. They let the high or the low happen and let the market react.
Then they pull back toward the high or the low and get in with a clearly
defined stop and hopefully ride it into the early start of a new trend.

The bargain hunters are generally long-term accumulators and distributors.

I would put Warren Buffett as a bargain hunter. He waits for all hell to
break loose and everybody to be dying to sell. There are bargains
everywhere. It’s almost like going to shop on a sale day after
Thanksgiving and waiting for a great bargain.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 2 of 15

 Those are the three different types of traders: top and bottom pickers,
trend followers and bargain hunters. Neely River theory recognizes all
three as an important part of the market.

Most systems just pick one and say, “We’re a trend follower or a trend-
following system.” It’s only dealing with one third of the reality of a
market, which means by definition that it only can make great money
about a third of the time.

The rest of the time it’s either going to struggle or lose money, because the
market doesn’t always behave in the trend-following fashion. It isn’t
always trending. Sometimes it goes sideways for long periods of time,
which is when bargain hunting works better.

Sometimes markets have major-defined tops. Elliott Wave theory works

really great for picking tops and bottoms. Catching the high or the low is
the best time to get in for environments like that.

Each environment has its special place and time. Every dog has its day. If
you only trade in one particular fashion, then you’re automatically going
to be limiting yourself to only about one third of the time that a market is
behaving in that way.

That’s why most systems are designed around the idea that you’re going to
lose money for a while but you just have to control your risk so that when
things get good, you’ll start making money.

Neely River theory takes a whole different approach. It tries to figure out
who’s in charge: trend followers, bargain hunters or top and bottom
pickers? It tries to figure out which group is in charge based on a very
objective process, not a subjective or mathematical formula or anything
like that. It allows you to automatically and immediately adjust the way
you’re trading to fit that style of trader, so you’re doing what that one out

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 3 of 15

 of three is doing the right way instead of what the two-thirds are doing the
wrong way for every little change in the environment.

The Neely River trader is constantly changing the way they trade. Right
now on the S&P, we’re currently trend followers. We went short into
weakness just a week or so ago. So far it’s working out great, but
sometimes I’ll wait for the market to bounce off a low and go short on a
balance. Sometimes I’ll look to pick a top or a bottom.

I’m constantly changing the way I trade, which is one reason why I think
my service does pretty well most of the time. I’m not trying to force the
market to fit a particular style of trading, which virtually all other
computer systems, newsletters and whatever else do. They almost always
stick to one style of trading. That’s the downfall.

If we move on to the chart where it shows three trading zones, the three
trading zones reflect what I’m talking about. If the market trend is up,
Zone 1 up at the top would be the trend followers where they’re buying
into strength. Zone 2 would be where bargain hunters are buying into
retracements. Zone 3 would be the wholesale buyers are buying near the
low, trying to pick the bottom. If you have a downtrend, you have three
more zones exactly the same concept but all in reverse.

When it comes to markets, you actually have six different realities. Let’s
say in a regular retail environment, you only have at most about three
realities. You have the wholesaler who then might sell to a middleman
who then might warehouse these products locally. Then you have the retail
location, like a store or grocery store where you’re buying these final
products. They hope you take it home and never come back. It’s a one-
directional phenomenon from the wholesaler to the middleman to the
retailer.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 4 of 15

 When it comes to markets, there is no absolute defined best or worst price.
Nobody really knows what the best price is, so you can have people
buying and selling in both directions. You have wholesalers trying to pick
the bottom if they think the trend is up. Then you might have wholesalers
trying to pick the top if they think the trend is down. You have a
deepening and doubling of complexity of the market. This creates six
different participants in the market. There are those who are bullish, and
that’s your three that I mentioned earlier. It’s your trend followers, bargain
hunters and top and bottom pickers.

Then you have the same thing occurring on the bear side. You have the
same three people looking at things in the exact opposite way. You have
six primary participants. If you have six participants in a market and you
divide that by 100, that means you’re only getting a probability of being
right about 12.5% of the time because you’re trying to be that one out of
six who’s doing the exact right thing at the exact right time. That’s the
reason why it’s so hard for most people to make money trading. The
chances of always being that one out of six aren’t very good.

Neely River theory’s goal – without any kind of formula or mathematical

formulas but pure observational analysis that’s based on current
information not forecasts of the future – is to give you an idea what the
actual trend is just by observing.

If you’re standing in front of a river, it doesn’t take a lot of time, analysis

or instruments to figure out which way the water is going. You just look
and can tell. Neely River theory is the same way. You can just look at a
chart and tell what the likely trend is.

Once you know what the trend is, then you have to decide: Am I going to
be a trend trader, buy at the strength, wait for a 50% reaction and buy on a
pullback, or am I going to try to pick the bottom?

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 5 of 15

 Neely River theory also makes a process of determining who is in charge
of the trend relatively easy. You know what style of trading you’re going
to implement. Bud, do you have any questions before I go on?

Interviewer: How does Neely River theory help us define if one of those three traders is
dominating the market?

Glenn Neely: It all has to do with just looking at price action. Of course, that’s the secret
part that I don’t reveal to the public. It’s something I’ve been working out
for 30 years. It’s taken a lifetime to understand all this. It’s not something
I just hand out free to the public, but I make it a very objective process.

When I start the class with students, I explained that when most people
approach the markets, they come in with this thought process – that
predicting the future is the way you make money trading. I think we
covered that in Part 1 when I talked about a trading paradigm and a
forecasting paradigm. Have we gone through that yet?

Interviewer: Yes. We did.

Glenn Neely: They come into a market with the belief, and strictly just a human belief
and decision, that markets have to be predicted first, before you can
benefit from them.

Neely River theory turns that whole thing upside down. It’s related to the
way rivers work. You don’t look at a river and decide which direction the
ocean is.

When you’re trading, it isn’t about figuring out where the market is
ultimately going to go, so you can make money. The goal is to survive.
Your position has to survive until the market goes wherever it happens to
end up going. It doesn’t deal at all with trying to predict what’s going to
happen. It only deals with how you get in safely using the right kind of
entry strategy, stop placement and stop movement until the market takes

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 6 of 15

 you out or reaches a point where you can get more aggressive with your
stops. Eventually, you let the market stop you out.

You’re never anticipating where it’s going to go or worrying about where

it’s going to go. It’s worrying about where you’re going to get in, where
your stop is going to go and getting this to you as quickly as possible.
That’s the whole focus of Neely River theory.

Like I say, it’s extremely different from anything I’ve seen in my career. It
does take time getting used to this, because most people always feel like
they’re somehow in control of the human characteristic. They want to
control things, especially when it comes to finances.

They don’t want to just leave things to hope and faith, but if you compare
it to a river, your thoughts have zero to do with where the river is going to
go and how long it’s going to take to get to the ocean. What you think
about it is completely irrelevant.

It’s the same with markets. What you believe is going to happen is
irrelevant. What’s important is what you do right now to survive until
whatever is going to happen happens and you maneuver in a way that
you’re avoiding the rocks, sandbars, waterfalls, the edge of the river and
all of that. You’re just avoiding the problems until it takes you wherever
it’s going to go. That’s the way good trading is done. It’s taken me a
lifetime to figure that out.

Interviewer: I’m going to ask a few more questions. You can always kindly decline if I
get into too much detail, because I’m not sure if the level of question I ask
is going to be too detailed for this conversation. I suspect that the Neely
River theory focuses a lot on horizontal supports and resistance, especially
considering when you deal with the trend-following trader, who is more of
a breakout trader, and something with retracement, which you consider the
bargain hunter. I would call that more the retracement trader where they

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 7 of 15

 come and buy 50% retracements and 60.8% retracements. It’s a Fibonacci
type of deal.

My first question would be, are horizontal supporters one of the key
factors that you focus on? The second thing is, for picking the top and the
bottom, that seems to be fairly difficult, because you really don’t have a
horizontal support and resistance most of the time.

Glenn Neely: The way you’re talking automatically implies there’s prediction involved
with the process. If you’re talking about support and resistance, you’re
automatically trying to predict something. Neely River theory is not about
prediction of future market action, where it might top or where it might
bottom. It’s about how you trade, how you enter, how you exit and how
you place stops, not what you think is going to happen.

With most of the students I teach, it takes at least a month before they get
out of this forecasting paradigm and into what I call a trading paradigm –
where you forget about what you believe, what you think, what’s
supposed to happen and how markets feel. It’s not about any of that stuff,
because those are all human judgment, forecasting, prediction and control
issues.

Interviewer: It’s very hard because the majority of traders obviously have to believe
something before they enter a trade. You’re saying that with the
technology you’ve discovered and implemented, it’s not to think like that.
It definitely requires a paradigm shift to get into your level of thinking.

Glenn Neely: Yes. There is a paradigm shift in thinking that is required. I think that’s the
only thing that will hold Neely River theory back from eventually being
really popular or famous, because it is completely contrary to the initial
belief system of anybody who is involved in markets.

When you come into the markets initially, you hear television talking
about every hot forecast or trade recently and what they think the markets

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 8 of 15

 are going to do. If you look at the newspapers, they’re always predicting
what the economy is going to do. When you get computer programs,
they’re always trying to predict what’s going to happen. There’s
psychoanalysis. Everything you see, hear and read is all about belief
systems regarding forecasting and that that’s the secret and ultimate best
answer to making money in the future.

Neely River theory flies in the face of all of that. The problem with Elliott
Wave analysis is that it’s too complicated to do well, so most people will
never go to the trouble to learn it, whereas Neely River theory is not a
learning-curve issue as much as a personal psychological paradigm shift in
the way you think about markets. It’s difficult for most people.

It took me probably 20 years to realize that something was wrong with

what I was doing, because I got better and better at Wave analysis to the
point where it was almost ridiculous how good my Wave analysis is
sometimes. My trading wasn’t getting equally better. It was falling way
behind and increasing at an arithmetic pace, whereas my forecasting was
increasing at a logarithmic pace.

The further apart they got, the more I started to question, “What in the
world is going on here? How is this possible? If I can predict well, why
can’t I trade well?” That’s when it dawned on me that prediction was not
the answer to making money. That’s a very bizarre thing to realize.

Interviewer: Sure. You mention a lot about stop placement and profit target, so I would
suspect that it depends on what kind of trader you think is dominating, and
when you enter a trade you already know where you’re going to place
your stop.

Glenn Neely: It’s the way you enter, how you place your stops, how you move your
stop, what your target is and if there even is a target. Even weirder, all of
that stuff changes almost every single bar. You have targets constantly

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 9 of 15

 moving up or down, stops constantly moving up or sideways and strategy
constantly changing, just like if you’re in a river.

You don’t just sit there in your boat and say a prayer. You have to put the
oars out, turn the engine on or do something. You have to steer through
the river. Real trading is just like that. It requires constant reevaluation and
constant maneuvering to stay alive.

Interviewer: I guess that goes the next slide where I imagine you actually have a buy or
sell stop limit, or do you do something else?

Glenn Neely: It depends. Generally speaking, with trend followers, you’re using buy
stops with sell stops. With top and bottom picking, you’re just
immediately jumping in at the market when you think the top and bottom
is occurring based on behavior. It’s not based on future expectations but
current behavior. With bargain hunting, you’re usually using a limit order
on a pullback.

Each one of them is different, which makes sense because each trade is
made in a different kind of way.

Let’s move to the next page, because I don’t want to get too bogged down
in that stuff. Let’s go into the page that says, “Tracing fish in a river.”
Instead of it being a fish, let’s just pretend it’s a slightly weighted Ping-
Pong ball that may have a little ball bearing or something heavy inside of
it to give it some momentum, so it’s not just being pushed around by the
air.

Let’s say you’re at the edge of a river and you place this weighted Ping-
Pong ball right at the edge of the river. The river is flowing, of course. If
you let go, that Ping-Pong ball is not going to go perfectly horizontal
along the north bank of the river. It’s going to get caught in turbulence,
move around and jump around in different kinds of ways until it might
pass what I call the event horizon, which is generally around 25% of the

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 10 of 15

 range of a river. When it passes that point, that’s when it gets into the
acceleration range of a river.

Then that Ping-Pong ball will start to move a lot quicker. As it gets to the
other event horizon on the other side, it potentially will get caught in the
fluid dynamics and turbulence on that side. It will go back and forth until
eventually it may hit the other side of the river.

The interesting part is that when I drew this out and realized what kind of
behavior you might get from a Ping-Pong ball or any kind of object in the
river, it actually starts to create a logical explanation for why Wave theory
exists.

On the next chart, which I think is the final chart, it actually shows Wave
count superimposed on the behavior of what you might see of a Ping-Pong
ball or some kind of object in a river being affected by the turbulence near
the perimeter, and then getting affected by the momentum in the middle,
and then getting affected by the turbulence toward the end.

This was a real eureka moment for me. I thought, “Wow, this is actually a
potentially higher level than Wave analysis, because it actually gives us an
explanation of how Wave phenomenon works and why it actually
happens.”

I do feel like Elliott Wave theory is generally one part of a three-pronged

equation. Wave theory primarily is a top and bottom picking technology.
Even though you can sometimes predict direction and trend, it gets very
hard toward the middle. It gets very hard during corrections to know
what’s going to happen. In the very beginning and the end, that’s when it
becomes very clear. For the most part, Wave theory is a top and bottom
picking system. There are two other things. There is trend following and
bargain hunting, which Wave theory doesn’t deal with as well.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 11 of 15

 I still think Wave theory is the most sophisticated form of technical
analysis ever devised, but it does have its flaws and problems. You need to
know when it’s useful and when it’s not and when it’s dangerous to use
and when it’s very advantageous.

I think this is a really cool graphic to show that there’s a logical way to
represent behavior connected to River theory, the behavior of water in the
river, and price action in the market. That then directly connects it to
Wave theory action and that price action.

Interviewer: You mentioned that Wave theory is an excellent tool to utilize picking top
and bottom. Do you incorporate that into your Neely River theory
technology, or is the Neely River theory technology a standalone
technology that does not use Wave theory for top and bottom picking?

Glenn Neely: River theory can stand alone, but in any market, it’s always nicer if you
know which direction not to trade. Just know that the trend is up when you
avoid any signals that might be to go short, and if you know the trend is
down you avoid any buy signals. Wave theory can be handy when helping
to determine the general trend or when big changes are occurring, like in
the S&P just recently.

The market all of a sudden dropped on Friday quite substantially and sort
of unexpectedly. I immediately realized that this may indicate that the bull
market is over that we’ve been into since 2009 – and that it’s the first time
in probably two years or more where it was even possible, so that was a
critical event.

For that reason, I’m primarily only going to focus on trade in some areas
that look to go short until Wave structure tells me otherwise. I tend to
integrate, because I do know Wave theory very well, but Neely River
theory can be used totally independently. It can do well on its own.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 12 of 15

 You just automatically eliminate 50% of any possible signals alongside of
the market if the trending is really up or really down and you know it.

That’s my overview for today. The primary understanding today is that

Neely River theory does have a connection to Wave theory. It helps to
explain why Wave theory actually works and where the phenomenon
actually comes from, which makes it, to me, an even more interesting and
compelling concept. It’s helping you trade without worrying about
prediction.

Here’s something we may not have covered yet. When you’re predicting a
market, the real problem with prediction is that it gets your ego involved
in the trade. The minute your ego is involved, you don’t want to lose. You
don’t want to be wrong. That’s really the reason that forecasting is so
dangerous. If you don’t have anything to lose, it’s much easier to be
objective and do the right thing.

Let’s say you get $400 in some market. You think the trend is up and it
drops to $390. You’re going to look for some rationalization. “It’s still
okay. I’m going to wait a little bit longer.” Then it goes to $380. “It’s
probably still going to go up.” You keep waiting, lowering stops or
adjusting things, and you keep losing more money.

That’s typically what happens to people who are in the forecasting

paradigm. Neely River theory completely avoids that. All stops are purely
objective. You can’t move them. You can’t change them. They never go
against the trend. They only go with the trend or stay where they are, so
you can never increase risk or move them below certain points. It makes
trading a lot easier for that reason.

You know they’re objectively designed and based on an idea of who’s in

charge, so you know you’re moving and placing them in the right kind of
way for the environment you’re currently dealing with, so you have the

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 13 of 15

 best chance of making money of any of the six people who are attempting
to make money from a trend.

Interviewer: This is my last question before we end this second interview. We have one
more interview coming up. Can you actually program Neely River theory
to be automated trading or is it still a fairly discretionary trading?

Glenn Neely: I’ve been working on automating Neely River trading for about 10 years,
maybe a little bit longer. I’ve been paying a programmer in Germany to
program it into TradeStation. For the most part, it’s done to where it
presents information.

River theory is more of an observational phenomenon just like Wave

theory is. There’s nobody who can come in and tell you with a
mathematical formula that this is the top or this is the bottom with Wave
theory.

River Theory is the same. It’s not a mathematical formula. It’s an

observational, real-time phenomenon that does not attempt to predict the
future. It just deals with what you know and what’s happened in the past.
It has nothing to do with what you think is going to happen in the future. It
can be programmed, but automation of it gets a little more difficult.

I’ve been working on automating it, but I always tend to find that just
having the information helps. Having the Wave theory structure in front of
you makes it easier to make the decision on how to approach the market
than to have a computer do it for you.

The computer can’t think in dynamic, deductive and inductive reasoning

and things that are just a little outside the realm of computers. Computers
want everything to be absolutely perfect where the human brain can kind
of think in fuzzy kinds of ways. Neely River theory, I think, is slightly
fuzzy. For that reason, I’d rather personally just look at the information

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 14 of 15

 and make a decision on the best way to approach a market than to try and
get it down to an absolute formula.

Interviewer: That was great, Glenn. I really appreciate your time, and we’ll look
forward to our next interview to dig even deeper into Neely River
technology. The first two interviews have been really exciting and
informative, and I appreciate speaking with you again.

Glenn Neely: Thanks a lot.

© 2013 Glenn Neely, NEoWave, Inc. [Link] Page 15 of 15