0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views8 pages

Chapter IV

This chapter analyzes data on cybersecurity threats and literacy among first-year college students at Sta. Teresa College, focusing on their experiences with scamming, phishing, and account hacking. The findings indicate that while students are familiar with various cybersecurity threats, their overall awareness and experience levels vary, with a general weighted mean of familiarity across different threats. Additionally, the students demonstrate a high level of cybersecurity literacy, particularly in managing their online privacy and security measures.

Uploaded by

denizpaolo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views8 pages

Chapter IV

This chapter analyzes data on cybersecurity threats and literacy among first-year college students at Sta. Teresa College, focusing on their experiences with scamming, phishing, and account hacking. The findings indicate that while students are familiar with various cybersecurity threats, their overall awareness and experience levels vary, with a general weighted mean of familiarity across different threats. Additionally, the students demonstrate a high level of cybersecurity literacy, particularly in managing their online privacy and security measures.

Uploaded by

denizpaolo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the data gathered from the study on cybersecurity

threats and literacy on Facebook among first-year college students of Sta. Teresa

College. The results are systematically analyzed and interpreted to provide

meaningful insights into the students' awareness, vulnerabilities, and experiences

concerning cybersecurity risks on the platform.

1. The Cybersecurity threats encountered by the respondents

Table 1.1 Cybersecurity threats in terms of Scamming


Perception Weighted Mean Verbal
Interpretation
1. Receive a suspicious email, 3.37 Very Familiar
message, or phone call claiming
that I had won a prize or money
2. Have familiarity with fake online 3.00 Familiar
stores or sellers that seemed
legitimate
3. Experience common signs of 2.98 Familiar
fraudulent emails or messages
4. Get messages on Facebook that 3.08 Familiar
seemed real but fake
5. Have familiarity with ordered 2.20 Slightly Familiar
clothes online but never received it
6. Experience almost buying from a 3.44 Very Familiar
suspicious online seller but decided
to check reviews before proceeding.
7. Experience the risks of sharing 2.55 Familiar
personal or financial information
with unknown individuals online
General Weighted Mean 2.95 Familiar

Table 1.1 shows the cybersecurity threats in terms of scamming as experienced

by the respondents. Social media platforms like Facebook have become primary avenues for

online interaction, information sharing, and communication. However, along with these

benefits come increasing cybersecurity risks that threaten users’ privacy and online security.
Among the most prevalent cyber threats are scamming, where cybercriminals deceive users

into providing money or personal information through fraudulent schemes (Furnell &

Dowland, 2010)

Among the perceptions, experience almost buying from a suspicious online

seller but decided to check reviews before proceeding, ranks first with a weighted mean

of 3.44 and familiar as verbal interpretation.

Next in rank is receive a suspicious email, message, or phone call claiming that

I had won a prize or money with a weighted mean of 3.37 and Get messages on

Facebook that seemed real but fake with 3.8 as the weighted mean. The four items

which are lowest in ranks are: h ave familiarity with fake online stores or sellers that

seemed legitimate, experience common signs of fraudulent emails or messages

Experience the risks of sharing personal or financial information with unknown

individuals online and have familiarity with ordered clothes online but never received

it with the weighted mean of 3.00, 2.98, 2.55 and 2.20 with familiar and slightly familiar as

verbal interpretations. Such identified cybersecurity threats in terms of scamming

received a general weighted mean of 2.94 with familiars as verbal interpretation.


Table 1.2 Cybersecurity threats in terms of Phishing Attack

Perception Weighted Mean Verbal


Interpretation
1. I get a suspicious post containing a 3.02 Familiar
link in Facebook.
2. I encounter fake websites or login 2.67 Familiar
pages designed to steal my
credentials.
3. I click on a link in an email or 2.49 Slightly Familiar
message from an unknown sender.
4. I experience changes in my account 2.30 Slightly Familiar
despite not touching.
5. I experience receiving a mail about 2.83 Familiar
identifying and avoiding fake login
attempt.
6. I am familiar with receiving a job 2.54 Familiar
offer email from an unknown
company asking for my personal
details and a small payment to
process my application.
7. I experience receiving a message 2.63 Familiar
asking for sensitive information.
General Weighted Mean 2.64 Familiar

Table 1.2 shows the cybersecurity threats in terms of phishing attacks that first

year college students experienced. Social Media platforms like Facebook becomes a

source of interaction between people. Phishing attacks consist of three phases:

delivering the phish to the victim, getting the victim to notice the phish and act, and

then using the illegally obtained data from the victim (Tandale & Pawar, 2020).

Although phishing attacks were once primarily a concern for email users, they have

also been conducted through other communication pathways, such as social media

(e.g., Benenson et al., 2017; Shafahi et al., 2016). For example, in a study

conducted on Facebook, the researchers, posing as an unknown user, sent out a link

through a Facebook message to direct participants to pictures from a fictional party

(Benenson et al., 2017). Among the questions listed, them experiencing on getting a
suspicious post containing a link in Facebook gets the highest rank with the weighted

mean of 3.02 and familiar as verbal interpretation.

Next is second rank is that respondents experienced on receiving a mail

about identifying and avoiding fake login attempt with a weighted mean of 2.83 and a

verbal interpretation of familiar. In third rank the respondents experienced fake

websites or login pages designed to steal their credentials with a weighting mean of

2.67 and a verbal interpretation of familiar. In fourth rank is when the respondents

experienced on receiving messages asking for sensitive information with a weighted

mean of 2.63 with a verbal interpretation of familiar. In fifth rank is when respondents

experienced receiving a job offer email from an unknown company asking for my

personal details and a small payment to process my application with a weighted

mean of 2.54 with a verbal interpretation of familiar. In sixth rank respondents

experienced on clicking a link with an email or message from an unknown sender

with a weighted mean of 2.49 and a verbal interpretation of slightly familiar. And the

lowest rank among the questionnaires, respondents experienced changes on their

account even though they never touched it with a weighted mean of 2.30 and a

verbal interpretation of slightly familiar. Despite that they achieved high and low

ranks respondents are familiar with their experience in cybersecurity threats and the

general weighted mean of 2.64, they’ve experienced such threats and know what

they mean.
Table 1.3 Cybersecurity threats in terms of Account Hacking

Perception Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation
1 I am familiar with my online account 2.39 Slightly Familiar
. being manipulated.
2 I am warned by a friend or contact 2.39 Slightly Familiar
. that my account had been hacked
and received suspicious messages
from me.
3 I receive a notification about 2.73 Familiar
. suspicious activity on my account.
4 I experience that my Facebook 2.46 Familiar
. password is being opened by anyone
else.
5 I experience suspicious activities, 2.60 Familiar
. such as login attempts from unknown
devices.
6 I experience dealing with account 2.44 Slightly Familiar
. recovery after being compromised.
7 I have lost money or incurred financial 1.76 Slightly Familiar
. harm due to my social media account
being taken over.
General Weighted Mean 2.40 Slightly
Familiar

Table 1.3 presents the cybersecurity threats in terms of account hacking that

first-year college students experienced. Hacking works by exploiting vulnerabilities in

cybersecurity defenses to achieve specific goals, such as gaining unauthorized

access to networks, devices, or sensitive data. Hackers may target anything from

computers and phones to devices and specific software to carry out their attacks.

First, the hacker gathers information about their target to understand how the system

works. Then, they look for any vulnerabilities they can exploit to gain access. Once

they find a way into a system, they can spy on activity, collect sensitive data, inject

malware, or carry out other aims. After, they’ll try to hide their tracks by removing

evidence of the hack (Buxton, 2025). Among the account hacking threats listed, the
highest rank that has a weighted mean of 2.73 and a verbal interpretation of Familiar

corresponds to receiving notifications about suspicious activity on their accounts.

This suggests that notifications from online platforms are a common experience

among respondents. Next rank received suspicious login attempts from unknown

devices with a weighted mean of 2.60 and a verbal interpretation of Familiar. In third

rank we have Facebook password being accessed by others with a weighted mean

of 2.46 and a verbal interpretation of Familiar which are also concerns that

respondents encounter relatively often. In fourth rank we have dealing with account

recovery after being compromised with a weighted mean of 2.44 and a verbal

interpretation of Slightly Familiar. In fifth rank is having warned by friends about

account hacking and experiencing account manipulation with a weighted mean of

2.39 and a verbal interpretation of Slightly Familiar. And the lowest rank among the

questionnaires with a weighted mean of 1.76 and a verbal interpretation of Slightly

Familiar is losing money or incurring financial harm due to social media account

takeovers. even though the respondents reached both high and low ranks, they are

knowledgeable about their experience with cybersecurity threats. and the general

weighted mean of 2.40, which falls under the category of Slightly Familiar, indicates

that most respondents have limited awareness or experience regarding these

threats.
2. The level of Cybersecurity literacy of the respondents

Table 2. Cybersecurity literacy

Perception Weighted Verbal


Mean Interpretation
1. I educate myself about new 3.46 Very Familiar
cybersecurity threats
2. I regularly back up important data to 3.33 Very Familiar
a secure location.
3. I review the privacy settings on my 3.49 Very Familiar
Facebook accounts.
4. I received a security alert and taken 3.45 Very Familiar
action to protect my Facebook
account.
5. I enable two-factor authentication 3.25 Very Familiar
on my online accounts.
6. I considered how my personal data 3.15 Familiar
is being collected and used online.
7. I avoid sharing my personal 3.58 Very Familiar
information publicly on my
Facebook account.
8. I logged out from my Facebook 2.90 Familiar
accounts after use.
9. I avoid clicking on links or 3.47 Very Familiar
downloading attachments from
unknown sources.
10. I seek out reliable resources to stay 3.42 Very Familiar
informed about cybersecurity
threats.
General Weighted Mean 3.35 Very Familiar

Table 2 shows the level of literacy in cybersecurity that first-year college students

experienced. Cyber Literacy means the ability to use computer technologies

effectively and to simultaneously understand the implications of those actions. It is

also important to know where to go to find reliable and accurate resources in

cyberspace, otherwise known as cyber intelligence (Kapon, 2018). Among the

account hacking threats listed, the first rank that has a weighted mean of 3.58 and a
verbal interpretation of Very Familiar, avoiding sharing personal information publicly

on Facebook account. Next rank is reviewing the privacy settings on Facebook

accounts with a weighted mean of 3.49 and a verbal interpretation of Very Familiar.

In third is avoiding clicking on links or downloading attachments from unknown

sources with a weighted mean of 3.47 and a verbal interpretation of Very Familiar. In

fourth rank is educating myself about new cybersecurity threats with a weighted

mean of 3.46 and a verbal interpretation of Very Familiar. In fifth rank is receiving a

security alert and taken action to protect Facebook account with a weighted mean of

3.45 and a verbal interpretation of Very Familiar. In Sixth rank is seeking out reliable

resources to stay informed about cybersecurity threats with a weighted mean of 3.42

and a verbal interpretation of Verry Familiar. In Seventh rank is regularly backing up

important data to a secure location with a weighted mean of 3.33 and a verbal

interpretation of Very Familiar. In Eighth rank is enable two-factor authentication on

online accounts with a weighted mean of 3.25 and a verbal interpretation of Very

Familiar. In Ninth rank is considering how personal data is being collected and used

online with a weighted mean of 3.15 and a verbal interpretation of Familiar. Lastly the

lowest rank among all the questionnaires with a weighted mean of 2.90 and a verbal

interpretation of Familiar is logged out from Facebook accounts after use. Even

though the respondents experienced both high and low ranks, they are

knowledgeable about their experience with the threats. The general weighted mean

of 3.35 with a verbal interpretation of Very Familiar, this indicates that the most

respondents have limited awareness or experience regarding these threats.

You might also like