Chicago Classification for the interpretation of
esophageal manometry: Evaluating for
disorders of EGJ outflow obstruction
This flow diagram represents a conceptual model of the process
for evaluating esophageal manometry studies using the
Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis scheme. Esophageal
motility testing protocols may be modified based on the
patient's symptoms, suspected diagnosis, and ability to tolerate
the study. In addition, esophageal manometry testing protocols
may vary by center.
EGJ: esophagogastric junction; IRP: integrated relaxation
pressure; LES lower esophageal sphincter; PEP: panesophageal
pressurization.
* For further assessment of EGJ obstruction, additional
maneuvers may include rapid drink challenge, liquid swallows in
a secondary position (eg, upright), and/or multiple rapid
sequence swallows. These maneuvers may be performed if
abnormal IRP is suspected or as part of a center's protocol.
¶ The diagnosis of achalasia is based on clinical, endoscopic,
radiographic and manometric findings. Patients with achalasia
typically have an elevated median IRP based on 10 liquid
swallows. When additional maneuvers (eg, rapid drink
challenge) are performed in patients with achalasia, the IRP of
the LES is similarly elevated. However, a manometric pattern
consisting of absent peristalsis and elevated IRP based on an
additional maneuver only is regarded as inconclusive for type I
or II achalasia. In such cases, other testing such as timed
barium esophagram or functional luminal probe imaging may
help to establish that LES relaxation is impaired.
Δ Patients with EGJ outlet obstruction and presence of peristaltic
swallows fulfill criteria for EGJ outlet obstruction. However, such
patients may also have features suggestive of achalasia or other
patterns of abnormal peristalsis defined by criteria for disorders
of peristalsis: EGJ outlet obstruction with spastic features, EGJ
outlet obstruction with hypercontractile esophagus, EGJ outlet
obstruction with ineffective motility, or EGJ outlet obstruction
with no evidence of disordered peristalsis.
◊ Manometry findings suggest a likely diagnosis, but it needs to
be confirmed by symptoms and supportive testing.
From: Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. Esophageal motility disorders
on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0 ©.
Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33(1):e14058.
[Link] Copyright © 2020
John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons
Inc. This image has been provided by or is owned by Wiley. Further
permission is needed before it can be downloaded to PowerPoint, printed,
shared or emailed. Please contact Wiley's permissions department on
permissions@[Link] or use the RightsLink service by clicking on the
'Request Permission' link accompanying this article on Wiley Online Library
([Link]
Graphic 86118 Version 4.0
© 2024 UpToDate, Inc. All rights reserved.