Module 3
Module 3
Module 3
Research design and Methods
Research Design
Meaning of Research Design: The most important step after defining the research problem is
preparing the design of the research project, which is popularly known as the research design. A
research design helps to decide upon issues like what, when, where, how much, by what means
etc. With regard to an enquiry or a research study. A research design is the arrangement of
conditions for collection and analysis of data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the
research purpose with economy in procedure. In fact, research design is the conceptual structure
within which research is conducted; it constitutes the blueprint for the collection, measurement
and analysis of data (Selltizetal, 1962). Thus, research design provides an outline of what the
researcher is going to do in terms of framing the hypothesis, its operational implications and the
final data analysis. Specifically, the research design highlights decisions which include:
1. The nature of the study
2. The purpose of the study
3. The location where the study would be conducted
4. The nature of data required
5. From where the required data can be collected
6. What time period the study would cover
7. The type of sample design that would be used
8. The techniques of data collection that would be used
9. The methods of data analysis that would be adopted and
10. The manner in which the report would be prepared
In view of the stated research design decisions, the overall research design may be divided into the
following (Kothari 1988):
a) The sampling design that deals with the method of selecting items to be observed for the
selected study
b) The observational design that relates to the conditions under which the observations are to
be made
c) The statistical design that concerns with the question of how many items are to be observed,
and how the information and data gathered are to be analyzed and
d) The operational design that deals with the techniques by which the procedures specified in
the sampling, statistical and observational designs can be carried out
1
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
2
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
3
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
The development of models and a comprehensive research plan are central to ensuring a systematic
and effective inquiry. A well-structured research plan acts as a blueprint, guiding the researcher
through each stage of the investigation and minimizing the chances of errors or inefficiencies.
Kothari emphasizes that the research plan should be tailored to the specific objectives of the study,
which often fall into categories such as exploration, description, diagnosis, or experimentation.
4
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
highlighting their respective advantages and limitations. The choice of sampling design directly
impacts the generalizability of the research findings, underscoring the need for careful
consideration to ensure the sample accurately reflects the characteristics of the target population.
Ultimately, developing effective models and a meticulous research plan encompassing these
aspects is paramount for conducting high-quality, systematic, and credible research.
Sampling design
The use of sampling in making inferences about a population is possible and has been in operation
right from beginning. When one has to make an inference about a lot of large size and it is not
practicable to examine each individual unit, then few units of the lot are examined and on the basis
of the information of those units, one makes decisions about whole lot. For example, a person
would like to purchase a bag of rice may examine a handful of rice from the bag and on the basis
of that he/she makes his/her decision about the purchase of full bag.
Population - A group of individuals having same characteristics in same surrounding is known as
population
Census - In census, we study about each and every unit of the population. Population means total
units of investigation area. In census, whole group related to investigation is investigated and the
information are collected, i.e. Census of population of a country, Census of import and export, etc
Sample - A finite subset of statistical individuals in a population is called a sample and the number
of individuals in a sample is called the sample size.
Sample Design: Essentials of Sampling For obtaining the unbiased and real result by a sampling
method, a sample should have the following factors (characteristics):
i. Homogeneity The nature of each and every unit of the population should not contain much
difference. If two or more samples are selected then they should be similar in nature not in
their response/output.
ii. Representativeness The sample should represent all the characteristics of the population
that can be possible only when the selection of items or units has been done unbiased and
each and every unit have an equal probability of chance to be selected in the sample.
iii. Independency Each and every unit of the population should be independent. In other words,
the selection of a unit in the sample should not be dependent on the selection of other units.
iv. Adequacy The number of units or elements which are to be selected in the sample should
be sufficient. If the sample size is not sufficient then results cannot be reliable. The more
the sample units in the sample, more reliable results would occur.
5
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
6
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
7
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
only among shoppers at high-end malls, it would introduce a bias towards higher-income
consumers. A well-designed sample plan proactively identifies and mitigates potential sources of
such biases to ensure the objectivity of the results.
Fourthly, a good sample design must be viable in the context of budget availability. Practical
considerations, including time and cost constraints, often influence the choice of sampling method
and sample size. While a larger and more complex sample might offer greater precision, it may
not be feasible within the given resources. Therefore, the design must strike a balance between
statistical rigor and practical implementability.
Finally, the sample should be such that the results of the study can be generalized with a reasonable
level of confidence. The ultimate goal of much research is to draw inferences about a larger
population based on the sample. A well-constructed sample design, particularly one based on
probability sampling, provides the statistical foundation necessary to make such generalizations
and to quantify the level of confidence associated with those inferences. In essence, a good sample
design serves as the bedrock for drawing credible and actionable conclusions from research.
Types of Sampling
Designs: According to the method of selection of sample, the sampling schemes can be categorized
as follows:
1. Non-probability sampling
2. Probability or random sampling and
3. Mixed sampling.
1. Non-Probability Sampling: In this method, the sample is selected with a definite purpose
in view and the choice of the sampling units depends entirely on the discretion and
judgment of the investigator. While selecting a sample, investigator tries to include each
and every characteristics of population in sample. Non-Probability Sampling scheme can
be classified as:
• Purposive Sampling In this sampling the sample is selected with definite purpose in
view and the choice of sampling units depends entirely on the discretion of the
surveyor. This sampling suffers from drawback of favoritism and nepotism of the
surveyor.
• Judgment Sampling In judgment sampling respondents are selected on the judgment of
the surveyor with the hope that they will meet requirements of the study. The underling
assumptions are that the respondent truly represents the entire population. To find out
the potential guide for the food and catering technology a researcher go to the teachers
of Hotel Management Department may be the example of judgment sampling.
8
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
9
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
• Inspection of Purity Inspection of purity of one sample can be done by another sample. In
this method measure of statistical error can also be done.
• Random Selection Selector has not to use his mind. He selects units at random.
• True Representation of Population In this method real characteristics can be represented
through sample because it is based on the law of statistical regularity and law of inertia. In
real, it becomes a small part of population.
Demerits of Random or Probability Sampling
• Inappropriate This method is not appropriate where some units are so important to be
included necessarily in the sample.
• Less Representative It may be possible that sample could not represent the population if
sample is not sufficiently large.
• Less Independency This method is useless if the units of the population are dependent.
Difference between Probability and Non-probability Sampling
• In non-probability sampling the selection of units are pre-decided whether in probability
sampling is based on chances.
• Non-probability sampling is biased but probability sampling is unbiased.
• In non-probability sampling, the errors are of cumulative in nature whereas in probability
sampling errors are less Statistical Techniques
• If a sample, from a population with homogeneous and important units, is to be selected
then non-probability sampling is appropriate where as probability sampling is used in
various kinds of population.
3. Mixed Sampling: If the samples are selected partly according to some laws of chance and
partly according to a fixed rule, they are called mixed samples and the method of selecting
such samples is known as mixed sampling. The merits of this sampling are the mixture of the
merits of both sampling. Selection of units is more reliable in this method because that is the
representation of various stages of population. In mixed sample no important characteristics is
left which is to be selected in the sample.
Measurement and Scaling:
Qualitative and Quantitative Data
Qualitative Quantitative
Concerned with understanding human Concerned with discovering facts
behavior from the informant's perspective about social phenomena
Conceptual
Assumes a fixed and measurable
Assumes a dynamic and negotiated reality
reality
10
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
Data are collected through participant Data are collected through measuring
observation and interviews things
Data are analyzed by themes from Data are analyzed through numerical
Methodological
descriptions by informants comparisons and statistical inferences
Data are reported in the language of the Data are reported through statistical
informant analyses
Data Collection
Methods of Data Collection: There are two types of data
• Primary Data— collected for the first time
• Secondary Data—those which have already been collected and analyzed by someone else.
Methods of Primary Data Collection
OBSERVATION METHOD: Commonly used in behavioral sciences It is the gathering of
primary data by investigator’s own direct observation of relevant people, actions and situations
without asking from the respondent. e.g. • A hotel chain sends observers posing as guests into its
coffee shop to check on cleanliness and customer service. • A food service operator sends
researchers into competing restaurants to learn menu items prices, check portion sizes and
consistency and observe point-of purchase merchandising. • A restaurant evaluates possible new
locations by checking out locations of competing restaurants, traffic patterns and neighborhood
conditions. Observation can yield information which people are normally unwilling or unable to
provide. e.g. Observing numerous plates containing uneaten portions the same menu items
indicates that food is not satisfactory.
Types of Observation:
1. Structured – for descriptive research
2. Unstructured—for exploratory research
3. Participant Observation
4. Non- participant observation
5. Disguised observation
Limitations: - feelings, beliefs and attitudes that motivate buying behavior and infrequent behavior
cannot be observed. - expensive method Because of these limitations, researchers often supplement
observation with survey research.
SURVEY METHOD Approach most suited for gathering descriptive information.
11
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
• Structured Surveys: use formal lists of questions asked of all respondents in the same
way.
• Unstructured Surveys: let the interviewer probe respondents and guide the interview
according to their answers. Survey research may be Direct or Indirect. Direct
Approach: The researcher asks direct questions about behaviours and thoughts. e.g.
Why don’t you eat at MacDonalds? Indirect Approach: The researcher might ask:
“What kind of people eat at MacDonald’s?” From the response, the researcher may be
able to discover why the consumer avoids MacDonald’s. It may suggest factors of
which the consumer is not consciously aware.
ADVANTAGES: -can be used to collect many different kinds of information -Quick and low cost
as compared to observation and experimental method.
LIMITATIONS: -Respondent’s reluctance to answer questions asked by unknown interviewers
about things they consider private. -Busy people may not want to take the time -may try to help by
giving pleasant answers -unable to answer because they cannot remember or never gave a thought
to what they do and why -may answer in order to look smart or well informed.
CONTACT METHODS: Information may be collected by Mail, Telephone, Personal interview
Mail Questionnaires:
Advantages:
• Can be used to collect large amounts of information at a low cost per respondent.
respondents may give more honest answers to personal questions on a mail questionnaire
• No interviewer is involved to bias the respondent’s answers.
• Convenient for respondent’s who can answer when they have time - good way to reach
people who often travel
Limitations:
• Not flexible
• Take longer to complete than telephone or personal interview -response rate is often very
low
• researcher has no control over who answers.
Telephone Interviewing:
• quick method
• more flexible as interviewer can explain questions not understood by the respondent
• depending on respondent’s answer they can skip some Qs and probe more on others
• allows greater sample control – response rate tends to be higher than mail
12
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
Drawbacks:
• Cost per respondent higher
• Some people may not want to discuss personal Qs with interviewer
• Interviewer’s manner of speaking may affect the respondent’s answers
• Different interviewers may interpret and record response in a variety of ways
• under time pressure ,data may be entered without actually interviewing
Personal Interviewing: It is very flexible and can be used to collect large amounts of information.
Trained interviewers are can hold the respondent’s attention and are available to clarify difficult
questions. They can guide interviews, explore issues, and probe as the situation requires. Personal
interview can be used in any type of questionnaire and can be conducted fairly quickly.
Interviewers can also show actual products, advertisements, packages and observe and record their
reactions and behaviour. This takes two forms-
Individual- Intercept interviewing Group –
Focus Group Interviewing Intercept interviewing: Widely used in tourism research. -allows
researcher to reach known people in a short period of time. - only method of reaching people whose
names and addresses are unknown -involves talking to people at homes, offices, on the street, or
in shopping malls. -interviewer must gain the interviewee’s cooperation -time involved may range
from a few minutes to several hours( for longer surveys compensation may be offered) –involves
the use of judgmental sampling i.e. interviewer has guidelines as to whom to “intercept”, such as
25% under age 20 and 75% over age 60
Drawbacks: -Room for error and bias on the part of the interviewer who may not be able to
correctly judge age, race etc. -Interviewer may be uncomfortable talking to certain ethnic or age
groups.
Focus Group Interviewing: It is rapidly becoming one of the major research tool to understand
people’s thoughts and feelings. It is usually conducted by inviting six to ten people to gather for a
few hours with a trained moderator to talk about a product, service or [Link] meeting is
held in a pleasant place, and refreshments are served to create a relaxed environment. The
moderator needs objectivity, knowledge of the subject and industry, and some understanding of
group and consumer behaviour. The moderator starts with a broad question before moving to more
specific issues, encouraging open and easy discussion to bring out true feelings and thoughts. At
the same time, the interviewer focuses the discussion, hence the name focus group interviewing.
often held to help determine the subject areas on which questions should be asked in a later,
largescale, structured-direct interview Comments are recorded through note taking or videotaped
and studied later to understand consumer’ buying process. This method is especially suited for
managers of hotels and restaurants, who have easy access to their customers. e.g. Some hotel
managers often invite a group of hotel guests from a particular market segment to have a free
13
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
breakfast with them. Managers get the chance to meet the guests and discuss what they like about
the hotel and what the hotel could do to make their stay more enjoyable and comfortable. The
guests appreciate this recognition and the manager gets valuable information. Restaurant managers
use the same approach by holding discussion meetings over lunch or dinner.
Drawbacks: -Cost: may cost more than telephone survey -Sampling: group interview studies keep
small sample size to keep time and cost down, therefore it may be difficult to generalize from the
results. - Interviewer bias.
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD Also called Empirical Research or Cause and Effect Method, it
is a data-based research, coming up with conclusions which are capable of being verified with
observation or experiment. Experimental research is appropriate when proof is sought that certain
variables affect other variables in some way. e.g. -Tenderizers ( independent variable) affect
cooking time and texture of meat( dependent variable) . - The effect of substituting one ingredient
in whole or in part for another such as soya flour to flour for making high protein bread. -Develop
recipes to use products. Such research is characterized by the experimenter’s control over the
variables under study and the deliberate manipulation of one of them to study its effects. In such a
research, it is necessary to get at facts first hand, at their source, and actively go about doing certain
things to stimulate the production of desired information. -Researcher must provide self with a
working hypothesis or guess as to the probable results. - Then work to get enough facts (data) to
prove or disprove the hypothesis. -He then sets up experimental designs which he thinks will
manipulate the persons or the materials concerned so as to bring forth the desired information.
Evidence gathered through experimental or empirical studies today is considered to be the most
powerful support possible for a given hypothesis.
Testing of Hypotheses:
A hypothesis test is a formal way to make a decision based on statistical analysis. Hypotheses.
Hypothesis tests are tests about a population parameter.
1. Hypothesis should be clear and precise. If the hypothesis is not clear and
precise, the inferences drawn on its basis cannot be taken as reliable.
2. Hypothesis should be capable of being tested. In a swamp of untestable
hypotheses, many a time the research programmes have bogged down.
Some prior study may be done by researcher in order to make hypothesis a
testable one. A hypothesis “is testable if other deductions can be made from
it which, in turn, can be confirmed or disproved by observation.”
3. Hypothesis should state relationship between variables, if it happens to be a
14
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
relational hypothesis.
4. Hypothesis should be limited in scope and must be specific. A researcher
must remember that narrower hypotheses are generally more testable and
he should develop such hypotheses.
5. Hypothesis should be stated as far as possible in most simple terms so that
the same is easily understandable by all concerned. But one must remember
that simplicity of hypothesis has nothing to do with its significance.
6. Hypothesis should be consistent with most known facts i.e., it must be
consistent with a substantial body of established facts. In other words, it
should be one which judges accept as being the most likely.
7. Hypothesis should be amenable to testing within a reasonable time. One
should not use even an excellent hypothesis, if the same cannot be tested in
reasonable time for one cannot spend a life-time collecting data to test it.
8. Hypothesis must explain the facts that gave rise to the need for explanation.
This means that by using the hypothesis plus other known and accepted
generalizations, one should be able to deduce the original problem
condition. Thus hypothesis must actually explain what it claims to explain;
it should have empirical reference.
The null hypothesis (H0) is a statement involving equality (=, ≤, ≥) about a population
parameter.
The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis.
The alternative hypothesis is what we conclude is true if the experimental results
lead us to conclude that the null
hypothesis (our assumption) is false. The alternative hypothesis must not involve
equality (6=, ). The exact statement of the null and alternative hypotheses depend on
the claim that you are testing.
We decide to reject the null hypothesis if the sample outcome contradicts our
assumption. The logic is as follows:
1. To make this decision we calculate the p-value := the probability of our
sample outcome or something more extreme occuring ASSUMING the null
hypothesis is true.
2. If the p-value is very small, our sample outcome was very unlikely (a “rare
event”) based on our assumption, so we reject our assumption.
3. Recall that our assumption is based on the null hypothesis, so rejecting the
assumption is the same as rejecting the null hypothesis.
4. The smaller the p-value, the larger (in absolute value) the z/t-score, so an
15
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
You will need to be able to distinguish these settings from each other. Notably, to
distinguish proportion settings from mean settings, think about the question being
asked. Are responses to the question of interest yes or no? If so, you are dealing with
proportions. If the response is a numerical value, you are dealing with means.
In hypothesis testing, we use sample data to choose between two competing
hypotheses. Think of it like a jury trial. There are two options: innocent and guilty.
You assume innocence until shown guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In hypothesis
testing, there are 2 choices, the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. You
16
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
assume the null hypothesis is true until the alternative is shown beyond “chance”.
Hypothesis - a claim about a population characteristic (parameter)
Null Hypothesis - the status quo - initially assumed true
Alternative Hypothesis - the researcher’s proposal - what you hope to show Main idea:
Reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative only with convincing/significant evidence.
We do NOT say that we accept the alternative, only that we have significant evidence to reject the
null. This is because we could have made a mistake.
• Forms of Hypotheses:
• Null Hypothesis: H0 : population parameter = some hypothesized value Alternative
Hypothesis:
• HA : population parameter is not equal to that same hypothesized value two-sided) OR
HA : population parameter > that same hypothesized value (one-sided to the right) OR
HA : population parameter < that same hypothesized value (one-sided to the left)
The process typically begins with stating the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative
hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis is a statement of no effect, no difference, or no relationship,
often representing the status quo or a commonly held belief. The alternative hypothesis,
conversely, is the statement the researcher is trying to prove, suggesting a specific effect,
difference, or relationship. These hypotheses must be mutually exclusive and exhaustive.
The next critical step involves setting the level of significance (alpha, α). This is the maximum
probability of committing a Type I error, which is the error of rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Commonly, α is set at 0.05 (5%) or 0.01 (1%), meaning there's a 5% or 1% chance, respectively,
of incorrectly concluding there's an effect when there isn't. The choice of α reflects the researcher's
tolerance for this type of error.
Following this, the researcher must decide the correct sampling distribution and select an
appropriate statistical test. The choice depends on several factors, including the type of data
(e.g., nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio), the size of the sample, whether the population standard
deviation is known, and the nature of the hypothesis (e.g., comparing means, proportions, or
variances). Kothari discusses various tests like the Z-test, t-test, F-test, and Chi-square test, each
with specific assumptions and applications.
17
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
The subsequent step involves calculating the test statistic from the sample data. This involves
applying the chosen statistical formula to the collected observations. This calculated value
represents how far the sample result deviates from what would be expected under the null
hypothesis.
Once the test statistic is calculated, it is compared to a critical value obtained from the chosen
sampling distribution, or alternatively, the p-value associated with the calculated test statistic is
determined. The critical value defines the rejection region(s) – the range of values for the test
statistic that would lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The p-value, on the other hand, is
the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated
from the sample, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
Finally, a decision is made: if the calculated test statistic falls into the critical region, or if the p-
value is less than the predetermined level of significance (α), the null hypothesis is rejected. This
implies that there is sufficient statistical evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If the test
statistic does not fall into the critical region, or if the p-value is greater than α, the null hypothesis
is not rejected, meaning there is insufficient evidence to conclude in favor of the alternative
hypothesis. It's crucial to note that "not rejecting" the null hypothesis does not equate to
"accepting" it; it simply means the data do not provide strong enough evidence against it. This
systematic procedure ensures that decisions regarding hypotheses are made on a statistical basis,
minimizing subjective judgment.
18
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
An Autonomous Institute Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi Approved by AICTE; ISO 9001:2015
Certified Accredited by National Assessment Accreditation Council (NAAC) with ‘A’ grade
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, Kumaraswamy Layout, Bengaluru-560078
19