Các từ vựng thường dung

A lot of/ lots of + N đếm được/ không đếm được: có nhiều

Many + N đếm được số nhiều: có nhiều
Either A of B + V(theo B): hoặc 1 trong 2
Neither A nor B + V(theo B): không có cái nào trong 2 cái
We can access + V_inf high-quality health service: chùng ta có thể tiếp cận
Các lỗi ngữ pháp
1. Với các danh từ không đếm được, không thêm s/es vào phía sau
Ex: advice, news, information, knowledge,…
- a lot of + N đếm được/ N không đếm được
- many + N đếm được số nhiều (many cars, many blocks)
 My fiends give me a lot of advice.
2. Có những danh từ vừa đếm được, vừa không đếm được
Ex: experience
- I have a lot of experience in Marketing.
- Studying abroad is a wonderful experience.
3. Hòa hợp giữa chủ ngữ và động từ chia thì
Ex: One of them is reading book.
4. Với cách diễn đạt hầu hết
- Most + N (most students, most people, most cities,…) => danh từ chung chung, không xác định
- Most of + these/those/the/my/your/our/her/his + N (most of my students, most of the cities in
my country,….) => cụ thể với 1 nhóm đối tượng
5. Với các đại từ bất định
Every/No/Some/Any + body/one/thing + V(số ít)
Ex: Everyone needs to learn how to cook.
6. Với giới từ nói về mục đích for/to
- for + N (for my studies/ for my work/ for my dream)
- to + V (to pass the exam/ to follow my love)
Note:
To search for sth = to find sth: tìm kiếm cái gì
To search + sth = lục soát địa điểm (to search the room, to search my bag)
Để nói về chức năng: Ex: A camera is for taking photos
7. Với các động từ thảo luận
Discuss + N (không dung discuss about)
Discuss + N = to talk about + N
8. There + V(theo N1) + N1, N2, N3
9. Rút gọn mệnh đề quan hệ
There are some books which are displayed on the shelves.
 there are some books displayed on the shelves.
10. Với các trạng từ tần suất
She is always late for work = she always goes to work late.
11. OSASCOMP: Opinion → Size → Age → Shape → Color → Origin → Material → Purpose
- S (Size - Kích cỡ): To, nhỏ, dài, ngắn (big, small, short)
- A (Age - Độ tuổi): Mới, cũ, trẻ, già (new, old, young)
- S (Shape - Hình dáng): Tròn, vuông, cong (round, square, flat)
- C (Color - Màu sắc): Đỏ, xanh, vàng (red, blue, white)
- O (Origin - Nguồn gốc): Xuất xứ từ đâu (Vietnamese, American, French)
- M (Material - Chất liệu): Làm bằng gì (wooden, silk, metal)
- P (Purpose - Mục đích/Chức năng): Dùng để làm gì (sleeping [bag], running [shoes])
12. Với cách diễn tả sở hữu
She has long black hair. (không có a/an/the)
I am having a lot of fun. (cảm xúc, khoảng thời gian)
13. Với cách diễn tả tuy nhiên
S1 + V1, but S2 + V2 = S1 + V1. However, S2 + V2.
14. Với cách diễn tả ảnh hưởng
Affect (v) = effect (n): ảnh hưởng
Effect (v): làm xảy ra
Ex: Social media can affect our mental health. (ảnh hưởng)
Effect (v) = make something happen: làm điều gì xảy ra
Ex: I hope that this new policy will effect some changes.
15. Với các tính từ
Adj(_ing): tính chất của người/vật (cooking is relaxing)
Adj(_ed): cảm xúc bị ảnh hưởng bởi tác nhân nào đó (I am tired)
I like cooking because it makes me relaxed.
16. Với câu hỏi gián tiếp (lồng trong câu hỏi khác)
Could you please let me know when I can receive the package?
CÂU 6-7 Email
Xin lỗi
We apologize for sending the wrong item/product. (to be sorry với văn phong không trang trọng)
We will resend you the correct item at no extra charge/ without cost.
Yêu cầu
I purchased an item/product from your store yesterday.
However, when I turned it on, there was no display on the screen.
Could you please send somebody/ arrange for somebody to fix my item/product?
Hỏi thông tin
I am very interest in your services.
I would like to know how much your services.
In addition, how can I sign up your class?
Cung cấp thông tin
Somebody will be do something next month.
Therefore, I would like to throw/hold a going-away party for her this week.
Gợi ý
I suggest that we do it next week./ It would be a good idea to do it next week.
That’s because we are working on three projects simultaneously this week. (=at the same time)
CÂU 8 ESSAY
Dựa trên template sau, viết 1 bài essay cho phần thi toeic writing khoảng >320 từ. Sử dụng lại
cấu trúc, từ vựng có sẵn, dễ dàng áp dụng cho các chủ đề khác. Phần body tập trung khai
thác 3 luận điểm convenient, cost-effective and experience. Tùy vào dạng bài (chọn 1 trong
các option, hay nói về ad – disad) mà viết cho chính xác

General template.
Introduction & Conclusion Template
(Opinion Essay)
Nowadays, (topic) has become more and more common/popular in modern society. Some people
believe that (Opinion A), while others prefer (Opinion B). Personally, I believe that (your
opinion) for several reasons.
To sum up, I prefer (your choice) because it is more convenient, more cost-effective, and
provides a better overall experience. I believe everyone should choose the option that best suits
their needs and preferences.
(Advantages & Disadvantages)
Nowadays, (topic) has become increasingly popular because of technological development and
changes in people's lifestyles. Like many other things, it has both advantages and disadvantages.
To sum up, (topic) has both advantages and disadvantages. Although it offers many benefits, it
also has some limitations. Therefore, people should consider their own needs before making a
decision.

Body
- Convenience: First, it is convenient. It saves me a lot of time and effort in my daily life. I can
do things more quickly and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience. As a result, I have
more time to focus on other important activities, such as studying, working, or spending time
with my family.
- Save money: Second, it is cost-effective. It helps people save a significant amount of money
because they do not have to spend as much on transportation, maintenance, or other related
expenses. This is especially beneficial for students and people who live on a tight budget.
- Better experience/ improve quality of life: Last but not least, it provides a better overall
experience. It makes people feel more comfortable, productive, and satisfied. Moreover, it can
reduce stress and improve the quality of life in the long run.
1. PROS & CONS OF TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS
Nowadays, many companies choose to interview over the phone. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of this interview method? Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer.
Nowadays, many companies choose to conduct job interviews over the phone instead of meeting
candidates face to face. This interview method has become increasingly popular because of
technological development. Like many other methods, phone interviews have both advantages
and disadvantages.
First, phone interviews are convenient. They save both employers and job applicants a lot of time
and effort because neither side has to travel to a specific location. Interviewers can speak with
many candidates in one day, while applicants can attend interviews from their homes. As a result,
the hiring process becomes faster and more efficient. For example, companies can interview
candidates from different cities or even different countries without arranging face-to-face
meetings.
Second, phone interviews are cost-effective. They help both companies and job applicants save a
significant amount of money. Companies do not need to prepare interview rooms or pay travel
expenses, while applicants can avoid transportation, parking, and meal costs. This is especially
beneficial for students, recent graduates, and people who live on a tight budget. Overall, phone
interviews reduce unnecessary expenses and make the hiring process easier for everyone.
However, phone interviews do not always provide a good overall experience. Employers cannot
observe a candidate's body language, facial expressions, or eye contact, which are important in
evaluating communication skills and confidence. Likewise, candidates may find it difficult to
build a personal connection with the interviewer. In addition, technical problems such as poor
phone signals or background noise can interrupt the conversation and cause unnecessary stress.
As a result, both employers and applicants may not fully understand each other.
To sum up, phone interviews offer many advantages, including convenience and lower costs.
However, they also have some disadvantages because they do not always provide a satisfying
interview experience. Therefore, companies should choose the interview method that best suits
their hiring needs and the type of position.
2. IMPROVE THE MOST WITH FUTURE INVESMENT: TRANSPORTATION,
SHOPPING OR THE ENVIRONMENT?
Nowadays, deciding where future investment should be made has become more and more
important in modern society. Some people believe that shopping should receive the most future
investment, while others prefer investing in the environment. Personally, I believe that
transportation should receive the most future investment because it is more convenient, more
cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience.
First, transportation is convenient. It saves people a lot of time and effort in their daily lives.
People can travel more quickly and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience. They can also
reach schools, workplaces, hospitals, and shopping centers more easily. As a result, they have
more time to focus on other important activities, such as studying, working, or spending time
with their families. Better transportation also makes daily routines smoother and helps people
become more productive throughout the day.
Second, transportation is cost-effective. It helps people save a significant amount of money
because they do not have to spend as much on fuel, parking, vehicle maintenance, or other
transportation-related expenses. This is especially beneficial for students and people who live on
a tight budget. In addition, businesses can reduce delivery costs and improve efficiency when
transportation systems are well developed. As a result, both individuals and companies can save
money and use their resources more effectively.
Last but not least, transportation provides a better overall experience. It makes people feel more
comfortable, productive, and satisfied while traveling. Moreover, it can reduce stress and
improve the quality of life in the long run. Reliable public transportation also makes cities more
attractive to tourists and creates a better impression on visitors. Furthermore, when more people
choose buses or trains instead of private cars, traffic congestion and air pollution can be reduced,
making cities cleaner and more pleasant places to live.
To sum up, I believe transportation should receive the most future investment because it is more
convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience. It not only benefits
individuals in their daily lives but also supports businesses, improves public services, and
enhances the quality of life for society as a whole. Therefore, governments should make
transportation their top investment priority in the future.
3. PROS AND CONS OF WORKING FOR THE SAME COMPANY FOR A LONG
PERIOD OF TIME.
Nowadays, working for the same company for a long period of time has become increasingly
popular because of changes in people's lifestyles and career goals. Like many other career
choices, it has both advantages and disadvantages. Some people enjoy staying with one company
because it provides stability, while others prefer changing jobs to gain new opportunities and
experiences.
First, working for the same company is convenient. Employees become familiar with their daily
tasks, working environment, company policies, and colleagues. As a result, they can complete
their work more quickly and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience. They also spend less
time adapting to new rules or learning new systems, allowing them to focus on other important
responsibilities. Furthermore, good communication with coworkers and managers makes daily
work smoother and helps employees feel more confident in their jobs.
Second, staying with the same company is cost-effective. Employees do not have to spend as
much time or money looking for new jobs, preparing for interviews, traveling to different
companies, or relocating to another city. This is especially beneficial for people who live on a
tight budget or have family responsibilities. In addition, companies can reduce recruitment and
training costs because experienced employees already understand their duties and require less
supervision. Therefore, both employees and companies can save valuable time and money.
On the other hand, working for the same company for many years may not provide the best
overall experience. Employees may have fewer opportunities to learn new skills, meet different
people, or experience different working environments. As a result, they may feel less motivated
or become less competitive in today's rapidly changing job market. Moreover, doing the same
type of work for a long time can reduce job satisfaction and personal growth. Some employees
may even lose interest in their work because they face the same tasks every day without new
challenges or opportunities to develop themselves.
To sum up, working for the same company for a long period of time has both advantages and
disadvantages. Although it is convenient and cost-effective, it may limit people's opportunities to
gain new experiences and develop their careers. Therefore, people should carefully consider their
own needs, career goals, and personal preferences before making a decision.
4. AGREE OR DISAGREE, IN THE FUTURE, PRINTED BOOKS AND NEWSPAPER
WILL BE COMPLETELY REPLACED BY ELECTRONIC VERSION?
Nowadays, printed books and newspapers have become an important part of people's daily lives.
However, with the rapid development of technology, electronic books and online newspapers are
becoming more and more popular. Some people believe that printed materials will continue to
exist, while others think they will be completely replaced by electronic versions in the future.
Personally, I agree that electronic versions will eventually replace printed books and newspapers
for several reasons.
First, electronic versions are more convenient. They save people a lot of time and effort in their
daily lives because users can access thousands of books and newspapers anytime and anywhere
with a smartphone, tablet, or laptop. They do not need to visit a bookstore or wait for a
newspaper to be delivered. In addition, searching for information is much faster because users
can simply type a keyword instead of reading page by page. As a result, people have more time
to focus on other important activities, such as studying, working, or spending time with their
families.
Second, electronic versions are more cost-effective. They help people save a significant amount
of money because they do not have to pay for printing, paper, or delivery. Many online
newspapers and e-books are free or available at a lower price than printed copies. This is
especially beneficial for students and people who live on a tight budget. Furthermore, using
fewer printed materials can reduce paper consumption, which also helps protect the environment.
Last but not least, electronic versions provide a better overall experience. They allow users to
adjust the font size, search for information quickly, and carry thousands of books in a single
device. Moreover, they make reading more flexible because people can continue reading almost
anywhere, such as on a bus, during a break at work, or while traveling. As a result, people can
enjoy reading more comfortably and improve their quality of life in the long run.
To sum up, I believe printed books and newspapers will eventually be replaced by electronic
versions because they are more convenient, more cost-effective, and provide a better overall
experience. Although some people still enjoy reading printed materials, I think electronic
versions will become the main choice as technology continues to develop.
5. AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT? IT IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF LARGE COMPANIES, RATHER THAN INDIVIDUAL
CITIZENS, TO REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION?
Nowadays, environmental pollution has become a serious problem in many countries. Some
people believe that reducing pollution is the responsibility of individual citizens, while others
think large companies should take the main responsibility. Personally, I agree that large
companies should play the more important role for several reasons.
First, it is more convenient for large companies to reduce environmental pollution because they
have greater resources and stronger influence. They can invest in cleaner technologies, improve
their production processes, and reduce waste more efficiently than individual citizens. A single
company can make a much bigger impact than one person changing daily habits. As a result,
environmental improvements can be achieved more quickly and effectively.
Second, it is more cost-effective for large companies to take responsibility. Although developing
environmentally friendly products or installing modern equipment may require a large
investment, companies usually have the financial resources to afford these changes. In addition,
reducing energy consumption and recycling materials can lower operating costs in the long run.
This benefits both businesses and society. Individual citizens can certainly help, but they often
have limited budgets and fewer opportunities to make a significant difference.
Last but not least, when large companies reduce pollution, they create a better overall experience
for everyone. Cleaner production methods improve air and water quality, making communities
healthier and more comfortable places to live. Moreover, companies can encourage customers to
make environmentally friendly choices by offering sustainable products and reducing
unnecessary packaging. As a result, people can enjoy a higher quality of life while also becoming
more aware of environmental issues.
Of course, individual citizens also have an important role. Simple actions such as recycling,
saving electricity, and using public transportation can help protect the environment. However, I
believe these efforts are much more effective when large companies take the lead and make
environmental protection a priority.
To sum up, I agree that large companies should take greater responsibility for reducing
environmental pollution because they have more resources, can achieve better results at a lower
overall cost, and create a better experience for society. Although everyone should contribute, I
believe large companies can make the greatest difference in protecting the environment.
6. MANY COMPANIES NOW ALLOW EMPLOYEES TO WORK FROM HOME ON A
REGULAR BASIC. ADVANTEGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Nowadays, many companies allow employees to work from home on a regular basis because of
technological development and changes in people's lifestyles. Like many other working
arrangements, this trend has both advantages and disadvantages.
One of the biggest advantages is convenience. Working from home saves employees a lot of time
and effort because they do not have to commute every day. They can avoid traffic congestion and
spend more time on important activities, such as working, exercising, or being with their
families. In addition, employees often have more flexible schedules, which helps them manage
their work and personal lives more effectively.
Another advantage is that working from home is cost-effective. Employees can save a significant
amount of money because they spend less on transportation, fuel, parking, and meals outside the
home. Companies can also reduce expenses by using smaller offices and paying lower utility
costs. This is especially beneficial for employees who live on a tight budget and businesses that
want to improve efficiency while controlling costs.
Last but not least, working from home can provide a better overall experience. Many employees
feel more comfortable in their own homes, which can help them stay focused and productive.
They can create a working environment that suits their needs and experience less stress from
daily commuting. As a result, many people enjoy a better work-life balance and a higher quality
of life.
However, this trend also has some disadvantages. One major drawback is that employees have
fewer opportunities to communicate face to face with their colleagues. This can make teamwork
and collaboration more difficult. In addition, some people may find it hard to separate work from
their personal lives, which can increase stress and reduce productivity. Working from home for a
long time may also make employees feel lonely because they have fewer chances to interact with
others.
To sum up, working from home has both advantages and disadvantages. It is convenient, cost-
effective, and can provide a better overall experience. However, it may reduce communication,
create work-life balance challenges, and lead to social isolation. Therefore, both employees and
companies should consider their own needs before deciding whether working from home is the
best choice.
7. TRAINING EMPLOYEES: STRUCTURED PROGRAMS OR ONE-ON-ONE
GUIDANCE FROM COWORERS.
Nowadays, employee training has become more and more common in modern companies. Some
people believe that structured training programs are the best way to train new employees, while
others prefer one-on-one guidance from coworkers. Personally, I believe that one-on-one
guidance from coworkers is a better choice because it is more convenient, more cost-effective,
and provides a better overall experience.
First, one-on-one guidance from coworkers is convenient. New employees can ask questions and
receive immediate answers while they are working. They can also learn daily tasks more quickly
and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience. As a result, they spend less time trying to
solve problems by themselves and have more time to focus on their work. Furthermore, learning
directly from experienced coworkers helps them adapt to the working environment more easily
and build confidence in a shorter period of time.
Second, one-on-one guidance is cost-effective. Companies do not have to spend as much money
organizing large training programs, preparing training materials, or hiring professional trainers.
At the same time, employees can continue working while receiving guidance from experienced
coworkers. This is especially beneficial for small companies or businesses with limited budgets.
In addition, new employees can begin contributing to the company more quickly, which
improves overall productivity and reduces unnecessary training costs.
Last but not least, one-on-one guidance provides a better overall experience. It allows new
employees to build stronger relationships with their coworkers and feel more comfortable asking
questions whenever they need help. Moreover, personalized guidance can reduce stress because
employees receive support that matches their individual needs and learning pace. As a result,
they often feel more confident, productive, and satisfied with their jobs. In the long run, this
training method can improve teamwork and create a more positive working environment for
everyone.
To sum up, I prefer one-on-one guidance from coworkers because it is more convenient, more
cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience. Although structured training programs
also have some advantages, I believe personalized guidance is a more practical and effective way
to train new employees. Therefore, companies should choose the training method that best suits
their employees' needs and their available resources.
SHOULD COMPANIES GIVE THEIR EMPLOYEES BREAK TIMES DURING THE
WORKDAY.
Nowadays, giving employees break times during the workday has become more and more
common in modern companies. Some people believe that companies should give their employees
break times during the workday, while others think employees should continue working without
taking regular breaks. Personally, I believe that companies should provide break times because
they are more convenient, more cost-effective, and provide a better overall experience.
First, giving employees break times is convenient. Employees can take a short rest, relax their
minds, and return to work with more energy. As a result, they can complete their tasks more
quickly and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience. They also have more time to recover
from stress and prepare for the next part of the workday. Furthermore, regular breaks help
employees maintain better concentration and reduce mistakes, making their daily work much
smoother and more productive.
Second, providing break times is cost-effective. Well-rested employees often work more
efficiently and make fewer mistakes, which helps companies reduce unnecessary costs.
Companies also spend less money correcting errors or dealing with problems caused by fatigue.
This is especially beneficial for businesses that want to improve productivity while keeping
operating costs under control. In addition, employees are more likely to stay with the company
for a longer period of time, reducing recruitment and training expenses.
Last but not least, giving employees break times provides a better overall experience. Employees
feel more comfortable, productive, and satisfied because they have opportunities to relax during
a busy workday. Moreover, regular breaks can reduce stress and improve both physical and
mental health in the long run. Employees who feel respected and supported by their companies
are often more motivated and willing to contribute to the organization's success. As a result,
companies can create a healthier, happier, and more positive working environment.
To sum up, I believe companies should give their employees break times during the workday
because they are more convenient, more cost-effective, and provide a better overall experience.
Although some people worry that breaks may reduce working time, I believe they actually
improve productivity and employee satisfaction. Therefore, companies should provide
reasonable break times to help employees work more effectively and maintain a better quality of
life.
SHOULD PEOPLE STOP USING SMARTPHONES WHEN THEY ARE WITH THEIR
FAMILY AND FRIENDS?
Nowadays, smartphones have become an important part of people's daily lives. Some people
believe that it is acceptable to use smartphones at any time, while others think people should put
them away when spending time with family and friends. Personally, I believe that people should
stop using smartphones in these situations because it helps them communicate better, avoid
unnecessary problems, and enjoy a more meaningful experience.
First, avoiding smartphones during family gatherings is more convenient for communication.
When people focus on the conversation instead of looking at their screens, they can listen more
carefully and respond more naturally. As a result, discussions become more engaging and
meaningful. Family members and friends can share their thoughts, experiences, and feelings
without being interrupted by notifications or social media. This allows everyone to make better
use of their time together.
Second, limiting smartphone use can be cost-effective in the long run. Excessive smartphone use
may lead people to spend money on unnecessary online shopping, games, or digital services. In
addition, constantly checking phones can reduce productivity and create misunderstandings in
personal relationships, which may cause additional stress and problems. By paying attention to
the people around them, individuals can avoid these issues and focus on what truly matters.
Last but not least, putting smartphones aside provides a much better overall experience. People
often feel more comfortable, relaxed, and satisfied when they have genuine face-to-face
interactions. Moreover, spending quality time with family and friends helps strengthen
relationships and create valuable memories. These moments can improve emotional well-being
and reduce stress in the long run. As a result, people are more likely to maintain strong personal
connections and enjoy a higher quality of life.
To sum up, I believe people should stop using smartphones when they are with their family and
friends. Doing so encourages better communication, helps avoid unnecessary problems, and
creates a more enjoyable experience for everyone involved. Although smartphones are useful
tools, there is a time and place for using them, and family gatherings are not one of them.
MAKING DECISIONS ALONE OR AFTER DISCUSSING THEM WITH A GROUP AT
WORK?
Nowadays, making important decisions is a common part of working life. Some people believe
that employees should make decisions on their own, while others prefer discussing them with a
group at work. Personally, I believe that discussing decisions with a group is a better choice
because it is more convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience.
First, discussing decisions with a group is more convenient. Team members can share their ideas,
answer questions, and solve problems together instead of relying on one person's opinion. As a
result, it is often easier to find a suitable solution in a shorter amount of time. In addition,
employees can avoid unnecessary confusion because everyone clearly understands the final
decision and their responsibilities. This makes daily work more efficient and helps projects move
forward smoothly.
Second, making decisions as a group is more cost-effective. When several people review the
same issue, they are more likely to identify mistakes before they become serious problems. This
helps companies avoid unnecessary expenses caused by poor decisions or repeated work. It also
saves valuable time because employees do not have to spend extra hours correcting avoidable
errors. Therefore, both the company and its employees can use their resources more efficiently.
Last but not least, discussing decisions with coworkers provides a better overall experience.
Employees feel more comfortable and confident because they know their opinions are valued.
Moreover, working together encourages teamwork, improves communication, and creates
stronger relationships among colleagues. As a result, people are often more motivated to
complete their work and contribute to the success of the company. In the long run, a supportive
working environment can increase both employee satisfaction and productivity.
To sum up, I believe discussing decisions with a group is a better choice because it is more
convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience. Although making
decisions alone may be faster in some situations, group discussions usually lead to better results
and fewer mistakes. Therefore, companies should encourage employees to work together when
making important decisions.
IS INTERNET NEWS LESS RELIABLE THAN PRINTED NEWS SOURCES?
Nowadays, people can get news from many different sources. Some people believe that internet
news is as reliable as printed news sources, while others think printed news is more trustworthy.
Personally, I believe that internet news is less reliable than printed news sources because printed
news is more convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience.
First, printed news is more convenient when people want reliable information. Newspapers
usually organize information in a clear and logical way, making it easier for readers to
understand important events. In addition, articles are carefully reviewed before they are
published, so readers do not have to spend extra time checking whether the information is true or
false. As a result, people can focus on understanding the news instead of comparing different
online sources.
Second, printed news is more cost-effective in the long run. Although many online news
websites are free, false or misleading information can cause people to make poor decisions that
waste both time and money. Readers may believe incorrect reports, buy unnecessary products, or
misunderstand important issues. By providing more accurate information, printed news helps
people avoid unnecessary mistakes and use their time and money more wisely.
Last but not least, printed news provides a better overall experience. Readers often feel more
confident because newspapers follow professional editing and fact-checking processes before
publishing articles. Moreover, they can read without distracting advertisements, pop-up
messages, or misleading headlines that are common on many websites. As a result, reading
becomes more comfortable, productive, and satisfying. In the long run, reliable information helps
people make better decisions in both their personal and professional lives.
To sum up, I believe internet news is less reliable than printed news sources because printed
news is more convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience. Although
online news is faster and easier to access, accuracy and reliability are much more important.
Therefore, people should always choose trustworthy sources when reading the news.
DOES REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE TEACH PEOPLE MORE THAN BOOKS DO?
Nowadays, acquiring knowledge and developing new skills has become more and more common
in modern society. Some people believe that real-world experience teaches people the most
valuable lessons, while others prefer gaining knowledge from books. Personally, I believe that
books teach people more than real-world experience does for several reasons.
First, learning from books is highly convenient. It saves me a lot of time and effort in my daily
life compared to gaining real-world experience. Instead of spending months or years on trial and
error, I can do things more quickly and efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience by reading
expert advice. As a result, I have more time to focus on other important activities, such as
studying, working, or spending time with my family.
Second, reading books is exceptionally cost-effective. It helps people save a significant amount
of money because they do not have to spend as much on transportation, expensive training
courses, or recovering from costly real-life mistakes. For example, exploring a foreign culture
practically requires expensive flight tickets and accommodation, whereas a book provides similar
knowledge for just a few dollars. This is especially beneficial for students and people who live
on a tight budget.
Last but not least, learning from books provides a better overall experience. While real-world
experience can sometimes be harsh and stressful, books offer a safe environment for intellectual
growth. It makes people feel more comfortable, productive, and satisfied when learning at their
own pace. Moreover, it can reduce stress and improve the quality of life in the long run, as
readers can make wiser decisions based on reliable guidance without enduring physical or
emotional hardships.
To sum up, I prefer learning from books rather than solely relying on real-world experience
because it is more convenient, more cost-effective, and provides a better overall experience.
Although practical experience is undeniably valuable, books offer a much safer way to learn. I
believe everyone should choose the option that best suits their needs and preferences.
PROS AND CONS OF WORKING AS A PROFESSIONAL MUSICIAN?
Nowadays, choosing a career as a professional musician has become increasingly popular
because of technological development and changes in people's lifestyles. Platforms like online
streaming make it easier to share music with the world. Like many other things, it has both
advantages and disadvantages.
First, working as a musician provides a better overall experience. It makes people feel more
comfortable, productive, and satisfied because they can turn their true passion into a lifelong
career. Instead of doing a boring and repetitive job, artists can express their deepest emotions
through music and connect with audiences worldwide. Moreover, performing on stage and
receiving genuine love from fans can reduce stress, bring immense joy, and significantly improve
their mental well-being and quality of life in the long run.
Second, this career path offers a great deal of convenience regarding scheduling. It saves artists
from the strict and exhausting 9-to-5 corporate routine, giving them the freedom to manage their
daily life. They can create music, practice, or write songs at their own pace without unnecessary
inconvenience from rigid office rules. As a result, musicians often have more flexible time to
focus on other important activities, such as finding inspiration or spending time with their family.
However, the major disadvantage of this profession is that it is often not cost-effective, especially
for beginners. Instead of saving money, independent artists have to spend a significant amount of
money on purchasing high-quality instruments, renting recording studios, and promoting their
albums to the public. Furthermore, they also face expensive transportation, accommodation, and
equipment maintenance costs during live tours. This financial burden is highly challenging for
musicians who live on a tight budget, as their monthly income is often unpredictable and
unstable compared to traditional jobs.
To sum up, working as a professional musician has both advantages and disadvantages. Although
it offers many fantastic benefits in terms of experience and convenience, it also has severe
financial limitations. Therefore, people should carefully consider their own needs and financial
readiness before making a decision.
SHOULD STUDENTS DO INTERNSHIPS BEFORE GRADUATING FROM COLLEGES?
Nowadays, doing an internship before graduating from college has become more and more
common in modern society. Some people believe that students should focus entirely on studying
to get high grades, while others prefer that they gain practical work experience early. Personally,
I believe that students should definitely do internships before graduation for several reasons.
First, doing an internship is highly convenient for a student's future. It saves students a lot of
time and effort in their daily lives when they start looking for full-time jobs. By gaining early
workplace exposure, they can learn professional skills and build networks more quickly and
efficiently without unnecessary inconvenience after graduation. As a result, they have more time
to focus on other important activities during their senior year, such as studying for final exams,
completing graduation projects, or spending time with their family.
Second, participating in an internship program is cost-effective. It helps people save a significant
amount of money because they do not have to spend as much on extra training courses or career
counseling after leaving college. For instance, testing a career path—such as in engineering or
education—early on prevents costly mistakes like pursuing the wrong profession and having to
retrain. This is especially beneficial for students who live on a tight budget and need a secure job
right away to support themselves.
Last but not least, working as an intern provides a better overall experience. It makes people feel
more comfortable, productive, and satisfied when they eventually transition from the classroom
to an actual workplace. Applying academic theories to real-world tasks builds immense
confidence and professional maturity. Moreover, being well-prepared for the future workforce
can reduce stress and improve the quality of life in the long run.
To sum up, I prefer that students participate in internships before graduating because it is more
convenient for job hunting, more cost-effective for career planning, and provides a better overall
experience. I believe everyone should choose the internship option that best suits their
educational needs and career preferences to ensure a successful future.