Economic Opportunities and Sustainable Development in the Amazon Region

1. Introduction
The Amazon, the world’s largest tropical rainforest, is in crisis. There are increasing calls for
politicians, business leaders, and researchers to team up with Indigenous Peoples to save the
Amazon and ensure sustainable development and economic growth. However, forest experts
agree that a weak political environment, pressure to exploit natural resources, and the crisis
brought by the pandemic all challenge this vision. Instead of pursuing exploitation, political
leaders must come together with other stakeholders and choose a path toward sustainable
development.

One way the Amazon can move toward sustainable development is by promoting the
potential of new sustainable economic opportunities. These opportunities may be even more
relevant and valuable as new technologies for transforming Primary Forest Products (PFPs)
into bioproducts that create innovative, higher-value-added consumer products become
available. Bioproducts from PFPs include industrial commodities and consumer goods
derived from the forest producing fiber-based materials, biofuels, food, pharmaceuticals,
cosmetics, and others. Examples are bioethanol derived from energy plantations and pulp-
based products converted into lifestyle products such as clothes and packaging.

New bioproducts and nanobiocomposites will maintain the bulk of the biomass in the forest.
The expected result is forest biorefineries that can fully refine forest biomass into developing
forty-six new bioproducts from PFPs for several biorefineries. The biorefineries produce
industrial commodities—bioethanol, bioplastic, and other chemical intermediates—and
consumer goods for important markets, such as packaging, textile, and construction. The
consumer goods companies invest in software development, and the packaging companies
fabricate plates and tubes for finished products. Implementation requires political stability,
creating conditions to invest in necessary farms.

2. Historical Context of Economic Development in

the Amazon
Since the arrival of Europeans, the Amazon region has been the subject of tremendous, often
reckless, exploration, exploitation, and colonization, seeking its vast resources. These
resources were primarily directed towards Europe, modifying local ecosystems and creating
challenges that persist to this day. For more than 500 years, this resource-driven vision of the
Amazon has only expanded, constantly evolving into new economic opportunities. In the
mid-20th century, the economic integration of the region into Brazil's national economy
began. In a vision of modernity and progress, the region was to be colonized, denser road and
urban networks built, and its natural resources exploited. These would include agricultural
commodities, electricity from dams, iron, minerals, and the extraction of allochthonous non-
timber forest products. Despite their differences, all these actions shared a utopian belief in
progress, development, and wealth that would flourish after this integration. (Hecht et
al.2021)
A pre-colonial history of the Amazon region varies. A few large regional empires dominated
the lowlands, similar to those in Central and Southern America, while the vast majority were
small, mobile, and semi-nomadic communities organized into smaller social units that lived
off river resources and yearly cycles of drought and flood. Despite their heterogeneity and
dynamism, they tended toward three main adaptations: the widespread domestication of fruit
trees along riverbanks, including palm trees (in seasonally flooded territories), and vine fruits;
sediment agriculture associated with white-earth palm trees in riverine terra-preta zones; and
mound-holed terra-preta agriculture in well-drained plateau areas, enabling the
transformation of an acidic, heavily leached savanna into a fertile mosaic landscape.

Colonial history also varies. The earliest attempts to explore the region hinges on diverse
social, political, and military visions of the continent, ranging from Catholic utopias to Jesuit
trade colonies, searching for gold, spices, and slaves. These efforts were complicated and
often resulted in disputes over profits between the Spanish Crown, Portuguese Crown, private
enterprises, and merchants. Before 1656, Portugal had barely occupied six thalassocratic
straits and few productive valleys. These settlements were frequently assaulted by the Dutch
and their biological warfare, with a resulting massive depopulation. No overall plan existed to
exploit Amazonia. The Portuguese relied on an expanding network of, initially, Jesuit-
speaking rubber-hunting tribes, which was later transformed into "voluntary" colonizing
campaigns.

2.1. Pre-Colonial and Colonial Periods

During the pre-Columbian era, the Amazon was inhabited by indigenous peoples who
occupied most floodplains and uplands. These societies relied on farming, fishing, and
hunting for nutritional sufficiency. They cultivated fruits, cassava, peanuts, and other crops,
using advanced techniques such as small-spaced intercropping. Urban-based and larger
societies were rare, with few exceptions, like the Marajoara culture in Marajó Island that built
ceremonial cities and created sophisticated pottery. By the time of European exploration, the
native population in the Amazon was approximately 3 to 5 million.

By the 1500s, several European countries, including Spain, Portugal, France, and the
Netherlands, contended for control of the Amazon. Spain prioritized a traverse through the
continent and the discovery of silver and gold, while Portugal, after the Treaty of Tordesillas,
focused on the coastal region. Due to its uncharted interior, Brazil was of little interest to
Europe initially. However, by the 1600s, the Portuguese were interested in the Amazon, as
they sought new sources of resources in the wake of sugarcane price decline in the 1550s.
(Cardoso, 2024)

French incursions into the Amazon were simultaneous, viewing it as an opportunity to

harvest drugs such as Brazil wood and curare. Following defeats in Europe, the French were
pressured to abandon Brazil. In the middle 1600s, the Dutch took over French settlements,
competing with the Portuguese for control of coastal cities and the sugar-producing
hinterland. However, competition was rendered useless after the restoration of the Portuguese
crown. By the late 1600s, the Dutch abandoned Brazil and retreated to the Caribbean.

In the 1600s, the Portuguese made efforts to consolidate their power in Brazilian territory, but
these were insufficient to confront European competition. The dispute over the south of the
Amazon River with Spain was submissive. Additionally, two treaties were made with the
Dutch and the French concerning their rights to the Amazon area. Finally, in 1670, a treaty
established the boundaries up to the Andes Mountains and the River Tefé, but the Treaty of
Utrecht settled the matter, conceding the Amazon to Portugal and confirming its dominance
in Brazil.

2.2. Rubber Boom and Deforestation

The above events set the stage for the so-called "Rubber Boom" (c. 1890-1920), when rubber
became one of the most valuable commodities on earth. It was not a stroke of good luck, but
rather an exaggerated overinvestment in the poorest region of Brazil which would soon be
followed by an equally dramatic collapse when the Amazon states suddenly and abruptly
became the poorest region in Brazil after understanding the dangers of monoculture on such a
fragile territory. This letter focuses mostly on the economic and social consequences of this
episode, truly tragic in its outcomes. It should be noted, however, that the damages were not
limited to the Amazon. There were losses in the city, too. Bellum was not just the capital of a
rich state now the poorest, but this state was also the richest in terms of cosmovision, beliefs,
and peoples, for the reemergence of racial consciousness is partially a byproduct of the
exclusion put in place by the economic model. These perspectives and experiences were
wiped out by rubber economic and racial preferences, however. For decades it was almost
unthinkable—let alone impracticable—for an Indian, Caboclo, or Mulatto to approach a
public office, a doctor, or a judge, outside the hierarchical structure of Indian posts and
bodies. Male-selected help couldn't compete with the Doc Morcego and Galego machines.
(Hormaza and Urquijoundefined)(Patrón, 2020)

As above described, the origins of the rubber economy began with the more or less artistic
harvesting of the Hevea rubber trees in an Amazonian jungle that was more "exotic" than
hostile, given the long and profitable history of trade between Manila and Lisbon. Then came
a large British investment aiming at opening a "new front of exploration" in the latex
business during what Raffles became known as the "opium wars." Ecological impossibilities
of controlling the process meant that it would "reinvolve" the Amazon entirely in the global
capitalism. The rents were suitably reinvested in maritime infrastructure: burgeoning ports
and railroads would incur financial capital deeper and deeper into forested areas stretching
thousands of kilometers to the interior. During its running up period, the great demand for
wood structures fueled an explosion of deforestation rivaling California and Michigan, where
a more robust growth of railroad-traded timber products would supply the same services. Just
like mining, rubber needed huge infrastructure investments, yet the result was disastrous.

2.3. Modern Economic Activities

The Amazon has witnessed numerous modern economic activities, intensifying
industrialization, and subsequent environmental transformation of the region. In the early
twentieth century, through the 1950s and 1960s, public policies endeavored to integrate the
Amazon with the rest of Brazil and to displace a portion of its population to the
underpopulated region. Following intense and oversimplified agricultural colonization,
decades of populist involvement generated debts, illegal land possession, deforestation, and
environmental degradation. After the military coup in 1964, the Brazilian state changed its
conception of Amazonia, leading to massive investment in roads and infrastructural
development. The 1970s saw the "arch of deforestation" take form, with public policies
launched to entice Brazilian migrants. With the rise of the agricultural development model
and the prominence of large agricultural enterprises, 1974's "Amazonic Development Plan"
aimed to construct a network of development axes with an economic focus on agriculture.
The completion of Transamazonica Road in 1973 encouraged Southeast Brazilians to
emigrate and disturbed the Amazon's intricate biodiversity. Transnational corporations
engaged in extensive logging and cattle-raising. By the mid-1980s, annual cattle ranching in
the Brazilian Amazon reached 8 million hectares, representing 57% of deforested areas.
Multi-national conglomerates, intense mineral extraction, as well as extensive agricultural
plantation monocultures intensified competition over land. By the 1980s, the Amazon Basin
became "saturated" with rubber, cattle pasture, maize, soybeans, and gold, rupturing
hydrological systems.

Although several regionally founded companies sought to foster Amazonas' agricultural

production, their role became increasingly marginal in the Brazilian state, where the
agribusiness sector became dominant. This altered economic landscape set the stage for the
economically inverted 1990s. Neoliberal policies favored foreign direct investments in the
Brazilian Amazon for timber extraction, agriculture, and mining. Large ranching held 7.1%
of the land area, yet accounted for 78% of annual deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.
Cattle pasture expanded by 133 million hectares between 1990 and 2004, reaching over 200
million hectares in 2018. Brazil also emerged as the world's largest beef exporter. In 2019,
however, the relationship between large-scale cattle ranching and massive deforestation
became well-established. Other destructive activities included soy, palm oil, and extensive
monoculture plantations. 74% of deforested areas from 2000 to 2018 were within large
landholdings of over 2,500 hectares. Planning to exploit undeveloped areas of the Amazon
Basin through massive transparent projects further compromised remaining standing forests.

3. Environmental Challenges in the Amazon

The Amazon Basin, one of the world’s most expansive and biodiverse tropical forests, covers
an area of over 5 million km², of which 60 percent is found in Brazil. Currently, it comprises
approximately 40 percent of the planet’s remaining forest cover. This unique biome,
comprising diverse habitats arranged in a mosaic, is home to 10 percent of global
biodiversity, including the greatest variety of plants and animals. It plays a fundamental role
in climate and rainfall regulation, with direct impacts on agricultural yields, hydropower
potential, and other sectors. However, the Amazon is also threatened by anthropogenic
activities which cause conversion, degradation, and deforestation of its forests.

Brazilian state environmental agencies are often inadequately equipped to deal with
environmental management. Key government agencies often lack sufficient funds to carry out
their programs, and enforcement actions are haphazard at best. A coalition of NGOs (CPI)
has been formed in Brazil to consolidate and improve international monitoring of
deforestation and forest degradation in the Amazon, tracking plots of forest both on the
ground and via space-based RADAR and satellite sources. Impacts on global climate change
that result from this deforestation are also being monitored.

Despite Brazil’s progress toward reducing deforestation, there is nonetheless a continuing

threat from large-scale activities, including expansion of agriculture and infrastructure, and
rising combustion of the Amazonian forests. If uncontrolled, it could lead to changes in
temperature and precipitation at local and regional scales with irreversible damage to a biome
which is unique to the world. The future of the Amazon, and that of Brazil itself, hangs in the
balance. Such biomes elsewhere have already been largely destroyed for crops, livestock, and
pulp. The remaining tropical forests of Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific are threatened
by Western greed for timber and subsistence activities of local peoples. Brazil stands – at
least for now – as a sanctuary. It could not only preserve the Amazon but develop it
sustainably as a global treasure trove of biodiversity and genetic wealth of inestimable value.
But a general question this raises is why Brazil, a developing country, should take on the
burden, perceived as a luxury of the well-off world, of conserving, nurturing, and enhancing
this global public good?

3.1. Deforestation and Land Use Change

The Amazon rainforest, the largest and most biodiverse tropical rainforest on Earth, harbors
one-tenth of all known species on the planet within its biomes, including a vast diversity of
flora and terrestrial invertebrates, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and birds. Spanning
across the political borders of Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Guyana, Suriname,
Venezuela, and French Guiana, the Amazon Region covers an incredible area and has a larger
vegetation space than the entire European continent. Imposing mountain ranges along the
western and southern sides, as well as the surrounding arid regions, help explain why the
Amazon Basin is one of the lowest and flattest landscapes on the planet. Sandwiched between
the Andes and the Guiana Highlands, it contains the world's largest system of freshwater,
permeated by thousands of rivers, most of which flow towards the Atlantic Ocean.

During the 20th century, Brazil was responsible for the majority of the clearances, initiating
colonization along the arc of deforestation that settled along its western border. Agricultural
and pasturing systems, coupled with the development of new roads or highways to access
these regions, transformed millions of hectares of forests into barren lands, alternating mosaic
landscapes of pastures, savannas, and iron-mining sites, or permanently replaced by
monocultural crops. As a consequence, vast amounts of the Amazon Basin and its delicate,
biodiverse ecosystems have been irrevocably lost in a very short period of time.

Brazil has been among the countries experiencing the highest rates of deforestation, land use
change, and environmental degradation. The devastation incited by land use change for
agriculture and cattle-ranching in the last decades and the new wave of development
proposals in the Brazilian Amazon threaten to erase millennia of species evolution and
adaptation. To mitigate and remediate the destruction of the Amazon rainforest, Brazil and its
neighbors pledged to increase the surveillance of illegally logged areas and even to ban all
logging in public forests. Although it is possible to raise income levels while protecting
primary forests, the challenges of achieving this are multifaceted and formidable. However,
given the codependence of the world's economic future and the biodiversity security of the
Amazon, it is imperative to confront the enormous challenge of developing the Amazon
Basin.

3.2. Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss

The Amazon rainforest is home to at least 10 million species of plants, animals, fungi, and
microorganisms, most of which are not found anywhere else on Earth. But every day, the
Amazon loses species and habitats as a result of logging, road building, agriculture, dam
construction, and other causes of deforestation. The largest rainforest on Earth is also facing
climate change effects, impacting biodiversity and its contributions to the global climate
system and the supply of ecosystem services. "Business as usual" in fossil fuel production
and international cooperation leading to a rise in average global temperatures of up to 2.5 °C
by 2100 has been projected to lead to near-complete transformation of the Amazon basin
from rainforest to savanna. In parallel to this warming, land-use change is projected to
continue, yet prospects for the integrity of the Amazon basin are generally bleak under
climate change, even in scenarios with limited additional land-use change. Consistent
projections of sustained land surface warming and drying arise from such models, potentially
exceeding the tolerance of many rainforest species and critically jeopardizing the rainforest's
capacity to supply important ecosystem services, including continental-scale carbon storage.
For "business as usual" scenarios, large areas of the western and southeastern Amazon are
projected to transition from rainforest to savanna by 2100 under 2 °C global average rise,
burdened by unprecedented fire risk and threatening extinction of large numbers of endemic
species.

The Amazon rainforest acts as a "water pump," recycling water vapor from rainfall back to
the ocean, thus maintaining a balance of rainfall on the South American continent. If
significant portions of the rainforest are destroyed, climate projections show an increased
likelihood of drought across Northeast Brazil, an area known as the Sertão. An altered
climate would present additional challenges for rural populations already struggling with
poverty and inequality. Beyond impacts on temperature and rainfall patterns, there is serious
concern about the loss of Earth's ecosystems and their services, including biodiversity,
pollination of crops, control of flooding, and climate stabilization. While estimates of species
loss over the past centuries range from 75 percent to 90 percent, current projections for the
Amazon are for more than 30 percent of species to be lost in the first half of this century and
closer to 100 percent in the following decades with "business as usual" land-use scenarios.
(O’Connor et al.2021)

4. Sustainable Development Strategies

Amid these daunting challenges, including bioethics, poverty, and illegal land occupation, a
range of development strategies and activities are being undertaken at different levels of
governance and society. In particular, the development of eco-tourism and the strengthening
of indigenous rights over land and resources have been put forth as a key option for balancing
economic development and conservation of the Amazon Basin. On the other hand, tribes of
sustainable agriculture and agroforestry have been directly proposed to enhance people's
well-being while maintaining forest integrity and ecosystem health. As with any large
projects with ambitious social and ecological goals, these proposed strategies face major
obstacles in terms of toning economic incentives, monitoring compliance, and securing
appropriate financial resources, and thus their fates remain uncertain.

By development pathways should be pursued and their implications for land-use trends
discussed. Then six key stages for understanding the evolution of alternative development
strategies in the Amazon and assessing the potential for scaling them up and fostering
sustainability be laid out. With improved understanding of these issues, key actions necessary
to support stakeholder initiatives toward more sustainable paths for the Amazon region can
also be drawn. Empirical insights from Amazonian case studies will help elucidate all these
points. First, recent developments of two candidate strategies - eco-tourism with indigenous
rights and agroforestry with sustainable agriculture - will be briefly reviewed.
In the past decade, the exploration of eco-tourism in the Amazon Basin has gained
momentum with campaigns in favor of indigenous survival and human rights. Various eco-
tourism projects promoting quasi-sustainable use of eco-touristic resources have been set up,
with involvement from indigenous people and other local stakeholders, governmental
authorities, church organizations, national and international NGOs, etc. Most of these
initiatives are expected to channel flows of monetary resources to indigenous villages and
help ensure their basic needs for food, health, education, and modern technology, while
enhancing their bargaining power vis-à-vis colonists and other external organizations.
Conversely, it will be aimed at turning local forests into sustainable and renewable sources of
income for indigenous people. It will also be hoped that eco-tourism would provide an
international market for the maintenance of traditional ecologically-oriented lifestyles and
cultures.

4.1. Eco-Tourism and Indigenous Rights

Among the several possibilities for sustainable development in the Amazon basin, eco-
tourism was the one which captured the greatest interest and sympathy from the NGOs and
the intellectual world. Eco-tourism is a form of sustainable development where the tourist
pays to see nature in a pristine state and would help preserve it because it would provide
income for the conservation of resources. Eco-tourism would provide an economic benefit for
the indigenous peoples good enough to attract and retain them in the reservation, and thus
help to prevent the dislocation of their communities and cultures.

This eco-tourism would work financially: the indigenous people would capture 50% of the
touristic profit, so they would be becoming rich and modern. The efforts invested in eco-
tourism were enormous: funds were supplied by international organizations such as the
World Bank, the UN, WWF, NGOs such as Survival International, Friends of the Earth and
even by the main Latin American states. They sent experts to the Amazon to elaborate secret
reports for internal use.

The "culturally sensitive" tourists, which eco-tourism would attract, were depicted as a new
and growing group - there were dozens of expensive tourist eco-packages made in
cooperation with prestigious travel agencies. In 1988, there were more than 34 different
guests picked up in the Brazilian Amazon by the foreign newspapers. There was great
journalistic interest in the Amazon and the indigenous issue.

Based on idyllic fantasies of Eden-like untouched peoples living in harmony with nature in
protean on primeval rainforests, the intellectual world designed technical and social plans for
the future of the Amazon. Eco-tourism was perceived as modernity without development, and
thus as a vehicle for the integration of indigenous people into the modern world while
holding their identity intact.

It seemed that there was no downside in the eco-tourism proposal: it would supply an
alternative to cattle ranchers and, at the same time, benefit and enrich the indigenous peoples.
Via the conservation of the resources the whole planet would benefit. Culturally sensitive
eco-tourism was designed as paradoxical Vargas-like patriotic promotion: the "New World"
was to be discovered, the "Noble Savage" would be globalized.
As an imitation of some Highland Scottish models, indigenous people were to be held
prisoners or semi-prisoners of paradise surrounded by a mythical pristine undisturbed nature
forever conserved in a benevolent spell of pre-Columbian times. In practice the model was
impossible because of several external factors that were poorly understood.

4.2. Agroforestry and Sustainable Agriculture

Agroforestry provides great opportunities for sustainable agriculture, helping to conserve the
forest while promoting agricultural production. On a global and national level, synergistic
policies and incentives should be put in place to ensure expanded capital investments in
agroforestry rather than monoculture, allowing forest usage and agricultural production side-
by-side for the sustainable development of rural communities. Strengthening partnerships
with agricultural businesses, commercial financial institutions, and development banks is
essential to increase investments and access to low-interest loans for farmers to implement
agroforestry. Support is also warranted for non-wood forest products through expanded
funding and marketing assistance, coupled with education and training. Agroforestry's
applications include soil conservation and increasing productivity while preserving or
rehabilitating the stock of natural resources.

On a local level, broad support should be created for education on sustainable agriculture and
agroforestry, involving the government, forest technical school, universities, and peasant
associations in educating about agroforestry techniques. This would help farmers put
agroforestry techniques in place and find alternative sources of income from the forest.
Farmers and non-governmental organizations have been successful in disseminating
knowledge about indigenous slash-and-burn cultivation practices, being open to improved
alternatives. Education about agroforestry should be a part of current field extension services
and combined with education about slow-burning slash-and-burn cultivation practices to
promote sustainable land use practices. (Cechin et al., 2021)

Partners and potential funding sources should be sought for implementing agroforestry
demonstrations at villages chosen with farmers' input, using currently successful methods of
development. Agroforestry techniques should be included in research proposals funded by
development banks and foreign firms to establish partnerships in the southern or eastern part
of Brazil. Aguadulce tradition could be relevant in partnership with the Mato Grosso do Sul
State University. Steps should be taken to stimulate formation or strengthen farmers'
organizations to capitalize on economies of scale.

5. Conclusion and Future Directions

The challenges that lie ahead are significant and complex, as are the opportunities. Changing
the trajectory of development in the Amazon region will require long-term and sustained
engagement. Attempting to do so in a fragmented or shortsighted manner will ensure the
continuation of unsustainable development pathways, with grave ecological, economic,
political, social, and geographic consequences both within the region itself and well beyond
it. Enormous creativity, resources, and time are required to avoid repeating past ecological
catastrophes. Furthermore, the international dimensions of the Amazon cut across many
critical global issues, playing a central role in sustainable development more generally. For
instance, policies being propagated around global trade, climate, biodiversity, forests, and
water have profound implications for the future of the region, and in many cases will
exacerbate rather than ameliorate the primary threats.

Some initial steps can be taken to achieve a sustainable vision for the region, even in light of
the uncertainties associated with global climate change. First, new political platforms are
needed to identify and mobilize the resources, constituencies, and coalitions required to
challenge and change the existing development paradigm. Second, existing national and
international programs to promote sustainable agroforestry, forest management, and forest
protection should be scaled up considerably. Third, priorities for investment should be made
consistent with ecological guidelines. Fourth, an entirely new suite of economic incentives
(plus regulations to restrict anthropogenic change to ecologically indeterminate ranges) is
required to promote the safeguarding of large areas of wilderness. Fifth, strategies to increase
the resilience of existing ecosystems to external shocks and the capacity to cope with
surprises should be pursued actively. Finally, the implications of changes in the ecological
realm need to be reflected in improved development planning mechanisms in the economic,
political, and social spheres.

In addition to addressing the socioeconomic threats to large-scale forests, it is also critical to

confront the threats stemming from large-scale biophysical changes in forests already greatly
transformed. Climate models and observations clearly point to significant changes in
precipitation regimes, temperature extremes, displayed variability, and the incidence of
catastrophic fire, pest outbreaks, and diseases in the future. Still poorly understood, these
changes are likely to have drastic consequences for forests already fragmented by large-scale
anthropogenic alteration, as well as the many goods and services dependent on them. The
challenge for the 21st century is to break the cycle of repeated forage-dominated system
collapses so common throughout history and to promote maintained-shade pathways that are
both fair and sustainable for the region and planet as a whole.

References:

Hecht, Susanna, et al. "The Amazon in motion: Changing politics, development strategies,
peoples, landscapes, and livelihoods." Amazon Assessment Report 2021, Part II (2021): 14-2.
[Link]

Cardoso, A. "The Amazon Connection: Tupi and Tapuia Exchanges in Dutch Atlantic Trade
(1600-1641)." Fronteras de la Historia, 2024. [Link]

Hormaza, Carolina, and Miguel Angel Urquijo. "Land Use in the Amazon from the Mid-
Nineteenth Century to 1950." The Anthropocene as Multiple Crisis: Perspectives from Latin
America: 231. [Link]

Patrón, A. L. "Jungle Cities: The Urbanization of Amazonia." 2020. [HTML]

O’Connor, John C., et al. "Atmospheric moisture contribution to the growing season in the
Amazon arc of deforestation." Environmental Research Letters 16.8 (2021): 084026. [Link]

Cechin, A., da Silva Araújo, V., and Amand, L. "Exploring the synergy between Community
Supported Agriculture and agroforestry: Institutional innovation from smallholders in a
brazilian rural settlement." Journal of Rural Studies, 2021. [Link]