We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Miscibility
The thermodynamic evolution of
solubility parameters from Hildebrand
cohesive energy density to 3D
Hansen space,
Predicting Polymer : 1
4
‘THERMODYNAMICS REFERENCE
MODULE // REF: SEC 16.1-16.2
u aCOATING FORMULATION
Finding conpatible solvents for
coating resins
ELASTOMER SWELLING
Predicting the snelling of cured
elastomers by solvents.
fr SOLUBILITY :
PARAMETERS
oe
PROCESS ENGINEERING
Estimating solvent pressure in
devolatilization and reactor
equipment.
ga02 MATERIAL DESIGN
[oer Predicting polymer-polymer,
7110 | polyner-binary-solvent, and random
010 | copolymer compatibility.
[The core utility of solubility parameters is bridging the gap between isolated
IL material properties and predictive multi-component behavior. _|The Physics of Cohesion
[~ Stage 1: Stage 2: tage I
LIQUID. PHASE SATURATED. VAPOR INFINITE VOLUME EXPANSION
7
e
ee
@
=
IL, al
T
LU =
oe
sal
Total Nolar Cohesive Energy
(Wet attractive interactions)
[ES =)
[Wola
Vaporization
L_fnerey J
I energy required to expand I
saturated vapor to infinite volume
| (completely separating nolecules) |
I cohesive Energy Density |
aU)
Vv
|__ ‘where ¥ is the rolar volune) __
cThe Baseline 1D Model: The Hildebrand Parameter
DEFINITION DIMENSIONALITY
‘The unit is mathenatically
derived as (cal/on"3)*0.5, which
equals 2.846 HPa*0.5:
Often considered the "internal
pressure" of the solvent.
THE BASELINE ASSUMPTION
Intended strictly for nonpolar, nonassociating systens
where doo = 0. Therefore, the total cohesive energy
Simplifies to just the vaporization energy (-U = AW).Predicting Miscibility via Enthalpy
THE HILDEBRAND-SCATCHARD EQUATION
Heat of mixing per unit
volune.
The difference in solubility
paraneters.
The volume fractions of
component 1 and component 2 in
the mixture.
AHn / Vm = (81 -
fe ot
based on the pioneering work of van der Waals, Scatchard, and Hildebrand.
CRUCIAL INSIGHT:
For conponents to be miscible, this
squared difference must be
exceptionally small.
52)*2 * D1 * D2
(L, |System Boundaries for Regular Solutions
LOCKED VOLUME
Components mix with
absolutely no volume
change at constant
pressure,
CENTER-TO-CENTER
Interaction forces act
exclusively between
‘the centers of
molecules,
INDEPENDENT PAIRS
Interaction between a
pair of molecules is
uninfluenced by the
presence of other
molecules.
RANDOM MIXING
Mixing is entirely
random and the
distribution is
temperature-
independent.
Q
}
x
f)
o
NO COMPLEXATION
Zero chemical
reaction or special
molecular
association occurs,
EMPIRICAL STARTING POINT
These strict assumptions are
rarely perfectly valid in reality,
but they provide an invaluable
starting point for empirical
expressions.THE BREAKDOWN CONDITION
NOHPOTAR ASSOCIATING
SOLVENTS aie IN
The enthalpy Results become FAQ
change on mixing non-uniform and a
is described with highly inaccurate. The
high accuracy. baseline model fails
to account for distinct
Xe stot ans intermolecular forces. ¥
athenatically Complete migeibiLity only
sufficiont. Scetxs if BOTH overall,
‘the degree of hydr
Bonding are strictly. similar.Decomposition: The 2-Term Expansion
orientational term)
32 > 5p (The polar
3d (The dispersive /
nonpolar term)
LIMITATION: While this splits the primary
forces, it fundamentally neglects induction
interactions (requiring a third parameter) and
struggles with complex hydrogen-bonding.The Complete 3D Framework:
Hansen Parameters
St? = dd? + Sp? + Sh?
ae a
od Sp 5h
Dispersion forces (Van Polar interactions.
Hydrogen-bonding term.
der Waals interactions)
KEY LAW: THE RULE OF EQUIVALENCE
Hansen's total solubility parameter (St) must mathematically equal the original
Hildebrand parameter (8). However, specific interaction quantities may differ depending
on the empirical determination method.Mapping Thermodynamic Space
Polar (5p)
Hansen parameters map
polymers and solvents
into a defined 3D
coordinate volume.
Mathematical proximity
in this 3D space
dictates physical
miscibility.
CAVEAT: While widely adopted,
Hansen parameters are empirical
and not universally accurate
for every system (alternative
basicity scales by Gerrard,
Arnett, and Dack exist).The So
Equation
Dimensions
Primary Use
Key
Limitation
ubility Parame
BASELINE (HILDEBRAND)
er Evolution
POLAR EXPANSION (2-TERM)
COMPLETE (HANSEN)
Bac 82 = 5d? + Sp? 5t? = 5d? + Sp? + Sh?
1p 2 Oy
(Total Cohesive | (Dispersion + Polar) | (Dispersion + Polar +
Energy) H-Bonding)
ee arate Mixtures with dipole | Universal baseline for
liquids. moments. polymers/solvents.
Fails to account for
distinct
intermolecular forces
Neglects induction;
fails on strong
hydrogen bonds.
Values are empirical
and methodology-
dependent.