0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views11 pages

Modeling Polymer Miscibility

Polymer

Uploaded by

sourbhwork19
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views11 pages

Modeling Polymer Miscibility

Polymer

Uploaded by

sourbhwork19
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Miscibility The thermodynamic evolution of solubility parameters from Hildebrand cohesive energy density to 3D Hansen space, Predicting Polymer : 1 4 ‘THERMODYNAMICS REFERENCE MODULE // REF: SEC 16.1-16.2 u a COATING FORMULATION Finding conpatible solvents for coating resins ELASTOMER SWELLING Predicting the snelling of cured elastomers by solvents. fr SOLUBILITY : PARAMETERS oe PROCESS ENGINEERING Estimating solvent pressure in devolatilization and reactor equipment. ga02 MATERIAL DESIGN [oer Predicting polymer-polymer, 7110 | polyner-binary-solvent, and random 010 | copolymer compatibility. [The core utility of solubility parameters is bridging the gap between isolated IL material properties and predictive multi-component behavior. _| The Physics of Cohesion [~ Stage 1: Stage 2: tage I LIQUID. PHASE SATURATED. VAPOR INFINITE VOLUME EXPANSION 7 e ee @ = IL, al T LU = oe sal Total Nolar Cohesive Energy (Wet attractive interactions) [ES =) [Wola Vaporization L_fnerey J I energy required to expand I saturated vapor to infinite volume | (completely separating nolecules) | I cohesive Energy Density | aU) Vv |__ ‘where ¥ is the rolar volune) __ c The Baseline 1D Model: The Hildebrand Parameter DEFINITION DIMENSIONALITY ‘The unit is mathenatically derived as (cal/on"3)*0.5, which equals 2.846 HPa*0.5: Often considered the "internal pressure" of the solvent. THE BASELINE ASSUMPTION Intended strictly for nonpolar, nonassociating systens where doo = 0. Therefore, the total cohesive energy Simplifies to just the vaporization energy (-U = AW). Predicting Miscibility via Enthalpy THE HILDEBRAND-SCATCHARD EQUATION Heat of mixing per unit volune. The difference in solubility paraneters. The volume fractions of component 1 and component 2 in the mixture. AHn / Vm = (81 - fe ot based on the pioneering work of van der Waals, Scatchard, and Hildebrand. CRUCIAL INSIGHT: For conponents to be miscible, this squared difference must be exceptionally small. 52)*2 * D1 * D2 (L, | System Boundaries for Regular Solutions LOCKED VOLUME Components mix with absolutely no volume change at constant pressure, CENTER-TO-CENTER Interaction forces act exclusively between ‘the centers of molecules, INDEPENDENT PAIRS Interaction between a pair of molecules is uninfluenced by the presence of other molecules. RANDOM MIXING Mixing is entirely random and the distribution is temperature- independent. Q } x f) o NO COMPLEXATION Zero chemical reaction or special molecular association occurs, EMPIRICAL STARTING POINT These strict assumptions are rarely perfectly valid in reality, but they provide an invaluable starting point for empirical expressions. THE BREAKDOWN CONDITION NOHPOTAR ASSOCIATING SOLVENTS aie IN The enthalpy Results become FAQ change on mixing non-uniform and a is described with highly inaccurate. The high accuracy. baseline model fails to account for distinct Xe stot ans intermolecular forces. ¥ athenatically Complete migeibiLity only sufficiont. Scetxs if BOTH overall, ‘the degree of hydr Bonding are strictly. similar. Decomposition: The 2-Term Expansion orientational term) 32 > 5p (The polar 3d (The dispersive / nonpolar term) LIMITATION: While this splits the primary forces, it fundamentally neglects induction interactions (requiring a third parameter) and struggles with complex hydrogen-bonding. The Complete 3D Framework: Hansen Parameters St? = dd? + Sp? + Sh? ae a od Sp 5h Dispersion forces (Van Polar interactions. Hydrogen-bonding term. der Waals interactions) KEY LAW: THE RULE OF EQUIVALENCE Hansen's total solubility parameter (St) must mathematically equal the original Hildebrand parameter (8). However, specific interaction quantities may differ depending on the empirical determination method. Mapping Thermodynamic Space Polar (5p) Hansen parameters map polymers and solvents into a defined 3D coordinate volume. Mathematical proximity in this 3D space dictates physical miscibility. CAVEAT: While widely adopted, Hansen parameters are empirical and not universally accurate for every system (alternative basicity scales by Gerrard, Arnett, and Dack exist). The So Equation Dimensions Primary Use Key Limitation ubility Parame BASELINE (HILDEBRAND) er Evolution POLAR EXPANSION (2-TERM) COMPLETE (HANSEN) Bac 82 = 5d? + Sp? 5t? = 5d? + Sp? + Sh? 1p 2 Oy (Total Cohesive | (Dispersion + Polar) | (Dispersion + Polar + Energy) H-Bonding) ee arate Mixtures with dipole | Universal baseline for liquids. moments. polymers/solvents. Fails to account for distinct intermolecular forces Neglects induction; fails on strong hydrogen bonds. Values are empirical and methodology- dependent.

You might also like