RESEARCH METHODS

Comprehensive Study Notes

Electronic Health Record (EHR) System in Tanzania:
Improving Healthcare Service Delivery
1. Types of Research / Classification of Research
Research can be classified in several ways depending on the purpose, time horizon,
methodology, and application. Understanding these classifications helps researchers select
the most appropriate approach for their study.

1.1 Classification Based on Objectives

a) Pure/Basic Research: Conducted to acquire new knowledge without any immediate
practical application. It is driven by intellectual curiosity and aims to expand the boundaries
of knowledge. Example: studying the nature of DNA.
b) Applied Research: Aimed at solving specific, practical problems. It uses existing
knowledge to address real-world issues. Example: developing a vaccine for a specific
disease.
c) Action Research: Conducted by practitioners to improve a specific practice or situation. It
is participatory and collaborative, often used in educational and organizational settings.

1.2 Classification Based on Time

a) Cross-sectional Research: Data is collected at a single point in time. It provides a
snapshot of the situation. Example: a survey conducted on a particular day.
b) Longitudinal Research: Data is collected over an extended period. It tracks changes
over time. Example: following patients over 10 years to observe health changes.
c) Retrospective Research: Looks back in time, examining past events or records.
Example: reviewing hospital records to identify trends.
d) Prospective Research: Follows subjects into the future to observe outcomes. Example:
following a cohort of patients after a treatment.

1.3 Classification Based on Methodology

a) Quantitative Research: Uses numerical data and statistical analysis to test hypotheses.
It emphasizes objectivity and replicability.
b) Qualitative Research: Focuses on understanding phenomena through non-numerical
data such as words, images, and observations. It emphasizes depth and context.
c) Mixed Methods Research: Combines both quantitative and qualitative approaches to
gain a comprehensive understanding of a research problem.
d) Experimental Research: Involves manipulation of variables to determine cause-and-
effect relationships. Uses control and experimental groups.
e) Descriptive Research: Describes characteristics of a population or phenomenon without
manipulating variables.
f) Correlational Research: Examines the relationship between two or more variables
without implying causation.

1.4 Classification Based on Application

a) Evaluation Research: Assesses the effectiveness of programs, policies, or interventions.
b) Policy Research: Conducted to inform policy decisions. It provides evidence to guide
government and organizational policies.
c) Market Research: Focuses on understanding market conditions, consumer behavior, and
business trends.
d) Clinical Research: Conducted in medical settings to improve patient care and health
outcomes.
2. Relationship Between Research, Philosophy and Theory
Research, philosophy, and theory are deeply interconnected and form the foundation of
scientific inquiry.
Philosophy and Research: Research is grounded in philosophical assumptions about the
nature of reality (ontology), knowledge (epistemology), and values (axiology). These
assumptions shape the research design, methodology, and interpretation of findings. For
example, a positivist philosophy leads to quantitative research, while an interpretivist
philosophy leads to qualitative research.
Theory and Research: Theory provides the conceptual framework that guides research. It
helps in formulating hypotheses, selecting variables, and interpreting results. Research, in
turn, tests, refines, and builds theory. This creates a cyclical relationship where theory
informs research and research informs theory.
The Research Process: Begins with a philosophical stance, which influences the theoretical
framework, which then guides the methodology and data collection. Results are interpreted
in light of the theory and philosophy, potentially leading to theoretical revisions or new
philosophical insights.
In summary, philosophy provides the worldview, theory provides the lens, and research
provides the method through which knowledge is generated and validated.
3. Hypothesis
3.1 Meaning of Hypothesis
A hypothesis is a tentative, testable statement or prediction about the relationship between
two or more variables. It is an educated guess based on prior knowledge, observation, or
theory. A hypothesis serves as a guide for research and specifies what the researcher
expects to find.
Types of hypotheses include:
• Null Hypothesis (H0): States that there is no significant relationship or difference
between variables. Example: 'There is no significant relationship between EHR
implementation and patient satisfaction.'
• Alternative Hypothesis (H1/Ha): States that there is a significant relationship or
difference. Example: 'EHR implementation significantly improves patient satisfaction.'
• Directional Hypothesis: Specifies the direction of the expected relationship (positive
or negative).
• Non-directional Hypothesis: Predicts a relationship exists but does not specify the
direction.

3.2 Importance of Hypothesis

1. Provides direction and focus to the research study.
2. Helps in defining the scope and boundaries of the research.
3. Facilitates the selection of appropriate research methods and data collection tools.
4. Enables the researcher to test and verify theoretical propositions.
5. Provides a basis for drawing conclusions and making inferences.
6. Helps in identifying the variables to be studied.
7. Contributes to the development and refinement of theory.
4. Characteristics of Hypothesis
A good hypothesis should possess the following characteristics:
8. Clarity: It should be stated clearly and precisely, leaving no room for ambiguity.
9. Testability: It must be empirically testable using available methods and data.
10. Specificity: It should specify the expected relationship between variables clearly.
11. Relevance: It should be relevant to the research problem and aligned with the
research objectives.
12. Consistency: It should be consistent with existing knowledge, theory, and previous
research findings.
13. Simplicity: It should be stated as simply as possible without unnecessary complexity.
14. Falsifiability: It should be capable of being proven false. A hypothesis that cannot be
disproven is not scientific.
15. Objectivity: It should be free from personal bias and based on observable evidence.
16. Explanatory Power: It should explain the relationship between variables and
potentially predict outcomes.
17. Logical Consistency: It should not contradict itself and should be logically sound.
5. Research Questions
5.1 Meaning of Research Questions
Research questions are specific queries that a study seeks to answer. They define the focus
and scope of the research and guide the entire research process from design to data
collection and analysis. Research questions are typically derived from the research problem
and objectives.
Types of research questions:
• Descriptive Questions: Ask 'what is' or 'how many'. Example: 'What is the current
status of EHR adoption in Tanzanian hospitals?'
• Comparative Questions: Compare groups or phenomena. Example: 'How does
patient satisfaction differ between hospitals using EHR and those using manual
records?'
• Relationship/Correlational Questions: Explore associations. Example: 'What is the
relationship between EHR implementation and healthcare efficiency?'
• Causal Questions: Seek to establish cause and effect. Example: 'Does EHR
implementation reduce medical errors in Tanzania?'
• Exploratory Questions: Used when little is known about a topic. Example: 'What are
the challenges of implementing EHR in rural Tanzania?'

5.2 Importance of Research Questions

18. Guide the research design and methodology selection.
19. Define the scope and boundaries of the study.
20. Focus data collection efforts on relevant information.
21. Provide structure for data analysis and interpretation.
22. Help in communicating the purpose of the research to stakeholders.
23. Form the basis for evaluating the success of the research.
24. Assist in selecting appropriate literature for the literature review.
6. Differences Between Hypothesis and Research Question
Aspect Research Question Hypothesis
Definition An open-ended query seeking an A testable, predictive statement
answer about expected outcomes
Form Written as a question Written as a declarative statement
Purpose Guides exploration and inquiry Guides testing and verification
Use Commonly used in qualitative Commonly used in quantitative
research research
Testing Not directly tested statistically Statistically tested (accepted or
rejected)
Flexibility More flexible and open-ended More rigid and specific
Stage Formulated at the beginning of Derived from research questions
research
Example How does EHR affect healthcare EHR implementation significantly
delivery in Tanzania? improves healthcare delivery in
Tanzania.
7. Variables in Research
A variable is any characteristic, number, or quantity that can be measured or counted and is
subject to change. Variables are the building blocks of research and are used to
operationalize concepts.

Types of Variables:
1. Independent Variable (IV): The variable that is manipulated or controlled by the
researcher to observe its effect on other variables. Also called the predictor or explanatory
variable. Example: EHR implementation.
2. Dependent Variable (DV): The variable that is measured or observed as a result of
changes in the independent variable. Also called the outcome or response variable.
Example: Quality of healthcare service delivery.
3. Control Variable: Variables that are kept constant to prevent them from influencing the
results. Example: Hospital size, location.
4. Confounding Variable: An extraneous variable that correlates with both the independent
and dependent variables, potentially distorting results.
5. Moderating Variable: A variable that affects the strength or direction of the relationship
between the IV and DV. Example: Internet connectivity (moderates EHR impact).
6. Mediating Variable: A variable that explains the mechanism through which the IV affects
the DV.
7. Categorical (Nominal) Variable: Variables with distinct categories without inherent order.
Example: Gender, blood type.
8. Ordinal Variable: Categorical variables with a meaningful order. Example: Likert scale
(strongly agree to strongly disagree).
9. Continuous Variable: Variables that can take any value within a range. Example: Age,
weight, temperature.
10. Discrete Variable: Variables that can only take whole number values. Example: Number
of patients, number of hospital beds.
8. Difference Between Research Problem and Problem
Statement
Aspect Research Problem Problem Statement
Definition A broad area of concern or difficulty A specific, concise description of the
that needs to be addressed issue being studied
Scope Broad and general Narrow and specific
Form May be expressed as a topic area Written as a formal paragraph or
statement
Purpose Identifies what needs investigation Clearly articulates what is wrong and
why it matters
Components General topic, context, and gap Background, nature of problem,
significance, and scope
Example (EHR Poor healthcare service delivery in Despite government initiatives, 70%
context) Tanzanian hospitals of Tanzanian hospitals lack
functional EHR systems, resulting in
delayed diagnoses, medical errors,
and poor patient outcomes.
9. Research Proposal Chapters
Title: Electronic Health Record (EHR) System in Tanzania: Improving Healthcare Service
Delivery

9.1 Chapter One: Introduction

1.1 Background of the Study
Healthcare systems worldwide are increasingly adopting Electronic Health Records (EHR) to
improve service delivery, reduce errors, and enhance patient outcomes. In Tanzania, the
healthcare sector faces numerous challenges including fragmented patient records, delayed
diagnoses, and inadequate information sharing between facilities. The Ministry of Health in
Tanzania has initiated various digital health programs, but EHR adoption remains
inconsistent, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas. This study investigates how EHR
implementation can improve healthcare service delivery in Tanzania.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Despite the recognized benefits of EHR systems globally, Tanzania's healthcare institutions
continue to rely heavily on manual, paper-based record systems. This has resulted in
inefficiencies such as lost patient records, delayed access to medical histories, medication
errors, and poor coordination among healthcare providers. A study by the Ministry of Health
(2021) revealed that over 60% of public hospitals in Tanzania do not have functional EHR
systems. This gap calls for an investigation into the barriers to EHR adoption and strategies
for improving healthcare service delivery through digital health records.

1.3 Research Objectives

Main Objective:
To investigate the role of Electronic Health Record systems in improving healthcare service
delivery in Tanzania.
Specific Objectives:
25. To assess the current status of EHR adoption in Tanzanian healthcare facilities.
26. To identify the challenges hindering effective EHR implementation in Tanzania.
27. To examine the relationship between EHR use and quality of healthcare service
delivery.
28. To propose strategies for enhancing EHR adoption and effectiveness in Tanzania.

1.4 Research Questions

29. What is the current level of EHR adoption in Tanzanian healthcare facilities?
30. What challenges hinder effective EHR implementation in Tanzania?
31. What is the relationship between EHR adoption and quality of healthcare service
delivery?
32. What strategies can enhance EHR adoption and effectiveness in Tanzanian
healthcare facilities?

1.5 Research Hypotheses

33. H0: There is no significant relationship between EHR implementation and quality of
healthcare service delivery in Tanzania.
34. H1: EHR implementation significantly improves quality of healthcare service delivery
in Tanzania.
1.6 Significance of the Study
This research will provide valuable insights for healthcare policymakers, administrators, and
practitioners on the potential of EHR systems to transform healthcare delivery in Tanzania.
The findings will contribute to existing literature on digital health in sub-Saharan Africa and
guide future EHR implementation strategies.

1.7 Scope and Limitations

The study will be conducted in selected public and private healthcare facilities in Dar es
Salaam, Mwanza, and Dodoma regions. Limitations include potential access restrictions to
some facilities and the rapidly evolving nature of health information technology.

1.8 Definition of Key Terms

• Electronic Health Record (EHR): A digital version of a patient's paper chart
containing real-time, patient-centered records.
• Healthcare Service Delivery: The process of providing health services to individuals
and communities.
• Digital Health: The use of digital technologies to improve health outcomes and
healthcare services.

9.2 Chapter Two: Literature Review

2.1 Introduction
This chapter reviews existing literature on EHR systems, their implementation globally and in
Africa, and their impact on healthcare service delivery. The review is organized thematically
following the 5Cs framework.

2.2 Theoretical Framework

This study is guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) developed by Davis
(1989), which proposes that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use determine the
adoption of information technology. In the context of EHR, healthcare workers are more
likely to adopt and use EHR systems if they perceive them as useful and easy to use.

2.3 Global EHR Adoption

EHR adoption has grown significantly in developed countries. In the USA, EHR adoption in
hospitals rose from 9% in 2008 to over 96% by 2015 (ONC, 2016). European countries have
also made significant strides, with Denmark, Finland, and Sweden achieving near-universal
EHR adoption.

2.4 EHR in Sub-Saharan Africa

EHR adoption in sub-Saharan Africa remains limited due to infrastructure challenges, limited
funding, and digital literacy gaps. Countries like Kenya, Rwanda, and South Africa have
made notable progress, but Tanzania lags behind in systematic EHR implementation.

2.5 Benefits of EHR Systems

• Improved accuracy and completeness of patient records
• Reduced medical errors and improved patient safety
• Enhanced coordination between healthcare providers
• Faster access to patient information during emergencies
• Better data for public health monitoring and disease surveillance
• Cost reduction through elimination of paper records

2.6 Challenges of EHR Implementation

• High initial cost of implementation
 • Limited digital infrastructure in rural areas
• Resistance to change among healthcare workers
• Inadequate training and capacity building
• Data security and privacy concerns
• Inconsistent policies and lack of interoperability standards

2.7 EHR in Tanzania

The Tanzanian government has made efforts to digitize health information through programs
such as the Tanzania Health Information Systems (THIS) and the District Health Information
Software 2 (DHIS2). However, patient-level EHR remains limited to a few pilot facilities in
urban areas.

2.8 Research Gap

Despite the growing body of literature on EHR in Africa, there is limited research specifically
focused on the impact of EHR on healthcare service delivery in Tanzanian public health
facilities. This study addresses this gap.

9.3 Chapter Three: Research Methodology

3.1 Research Design
This study adopts a mixed methods research design, combining quantitative surveys and
qualitative interviews. This approach allows for both breadth (quantitative) and depth
(qualitative) of understanding of EHR implementation and its impact on healthcare delivery.

3.2 Research Philosophy

The study is guided by pragmatism, which focuses on practical outcomes and uses multiple
methods to understand complex social phenomena. Pragmatism is appropriate for mixed
methods research.

3.3 Research Approach

A deductive approach is used to test hypotheses derived from existing theories (TAM), while
an inductive approach is used to generate new insights from qualitative data.

3.4 Study Population

The target population includes healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, clinical officers, health
records officers) and administrators in 30 selected healthcare facilities in Dar es Salaam,
Mwanza, and Dodoma regions.

3.5 Sampling
Stratified random sampling will be used to select healthcare facilities and participants,
ensuring representation from public, private, and faith-based facilities across urban and rural
settings. A sample size of 384 respondents will be calculated using the Krejcie and Morgan
(1970) formula.

3.6 Data Collection Methods

• Questionnaires: Structured questionnaires for healthcare workers to collect
quantitative data on EHR adoption, usability, and perceived impact.
• Interviews: Semi-structured interviews with hospital administrators and IT officers to
collect qualitative data on implementation challenges and strategies.
• Document Analysis: Review of health facility records, government reports, and EHR
implementation documents.
3.7 Data Analysis
• Quantitative Data: Analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, means)
and inferential statistics (regression analysis, chi-square tests) will be used.
• Qualitative Data: Analyzed using thematic analysis. NVivo software will support
coding and theme identification.

3.8 Ethical Considerations

• Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
• Confidentiality and anonymity will be maintained throughout the study.
• Ethical clearance will be sought from the relevant institutional review board.
• Participants will have the right to withdraw at any time.

3.9 Validity and Reliability

Validity will be ensured through expert review of instruments and triangulation of data
sources. Reliability will be tested using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (target: > 0.7).
10. Review of Five Articles on EHR in Tanzania
The following five articles are reviewed in relation to the title: 'Electronic Health Record
(EHR) System in Tanzania: Improving Healthcare Service Delivery'.

Article 1: EHR Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa

• Authors: Mutinga et al. (2020)
• Key Findings: EHR systems in Sub-Saharan Africa improve patient record
management but face challenges of inadequate infrastructure and digital literacy.
Tanzania-specific data showed that only 15% of health facilities had functional EHR
systems.
• Relevance: Provides baseline data and context for EHR adoption in Tanzania.
• Methodology: Mixed methods; surveys and focus groups across 5 countries.
• Recommendation: Investment in infrastructure and training is crucial for successful
EHR adoption.

Article 2: Digital Health in Tanzania

• Authors: Mwagomba et al. (2019)
• Key Findings: The DHIS2 system has improved national health data management,
but patient-level EHR is largely absent from public facilities. Nurses and clinical
officers expressed willingness to use EHR if trained adequately.
• Relevance: Highlights the gap between national health information systems and
patient-level EHR.
• Methodology: Qualitative; interviews with MOH officials and health workers.
• Recommendation: Develop a national EHR policy and invest in capacity building.

Article 3: Technology Acceptance of EHR

• Authors: Bawack et al. (2021)
• Key Findings: Perceived usefulness and ease of use are the strongest predictors of
EHR acceptance among healthcare workers in developing countries. User training
significantly increases acceptance.
• Relevance: Supports the theoretical framework (TAM) used in this study.
• Methodology: Quantitative; structural equation modeling with 400 healthcare workers.
• Recommendation: EHR design should prioritize user-friendliness and practical utility.

Article 4: EHR and Patient Safety in Africa

• Authors: Adane et al. (2019)
• Key Findings: EHR systems reduce medication errors by up to 50% in African
hospital settings. Integration of clinical decision support systems within EHR
enhances patient safety.
• Relevance: Demonstrates the direct impact of EHR on healthcare quality, directly
relevant to this study's objective.
• Methodology: Quantitative; quasi-experimental design comparing hospitals with and
without EHR.
• Recommendation: Integrate clinical decision support tools in EHR platforms.

Article 5: Barriers to EHR in Tanzania's Public Hospitals

• Authors: Kimaro & Nhampossa (2018)
• Key Findings: Key barriers include insufficient funding (cited by 80% of
administrators), poor internet connectivity, and lack of technical support. Rural
facilities face more severe barriers than urban ones.
• Relevance: Directly addresses the Tanzanian context and identifies specific
challenges to be investigated.
• Methodology: Qualitative; case studies of 10 public hospitals.
• Recommendation: Government must prioritize EHR funding and rural digital
infrastructure.
11. Questionnaires
11.1 Writing Questionnaires
A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions used to collect
information from respondents. Questionnaires can be self-administered or researcher-
administered and can include open-ended or closed-ended questions.
Types of questions include:
• Closed-ended Questions: Provide fixed response options (e.g., Yes/No, multiple
choice, Likert scale).
• Open-ended Questions: Allow respondents to provide free-form answers.
• Rating Scale Questions: Ask respondents to rate items on a scale (e.g., 1-5, Strongly
Agree to Strongly Disagree).
• Ranking Questions: Ask respondents to rank items in order of preference.
• Demographic Questions: Collect background information (age, gender, education,
etc.).

11.2 Guidelines for Writing Questionnaires

35. Define the Research Objectives: Ensure each question is tied to a specific research
objective or question.
36. Use Simple, Clear Language: Avoid jargon, technical terms, and ambiguous words.
Write questions that all respondents can understand.
37. Ask One Question at a Time: Avoid double-barreled questions (e.g., 'Is the system
fast and accurate?'). Split into two separate questions.
38. Avoid Leading Questions: Do not phrase questions in a way that suggests a desired
answer. Example of leading: 'Don't you agree that EHR improves healthcare?' Better:
'To what extent does EHR improve healthcare?'
39. Avoid Negative Phrasing: Negative questions are confusing. Instead of 'Do you not
use EHR?', ask 'Do you use EHR?'
40. Use Appropriate Response Scales: Match the response scale to the nature of the
question. Likert scales work well for attitude questions.
41. Order Questions Logically: Start with general questions and move to specific ones.
Group related questions together.
42. Include Instructions: Provide clear instructions for each section and for how to
complete the questionnaire.
43. Pre-test the Questionnaire: Conduct a pilot test with a small sample to identify
problems before full distribution.
44. Ensure Confidentiality: Inform respondents that their responses are confidential and
anonymous.
45. Keep it Concise: Limit the questionnaire to the essential questions needed to address
the research objectives.
46. Avoid Sensitive Questions at the Start: Place sensitive questions (e.g., income,
personal views) later in the questionnaire when rapport is established.
12. Interview Method
An interview is a data collection method involving direct communication between the
researcher and the respondent. Interviews can be structured (fixed questions), semi-
structured (guide with flexibility), or unstructured (open conversation). They are particularly
useful in qualitative research for gaining in-depth insights.
Types of interviews:
• Structured Interview: Uses a predetermined set of questions with fixed response
options. Allows for easy comparison and analysis.
• Semi-structured Interview: Uses a guide with key questions but allows for follow-up
and exploration. Balances consistency and flexibility.
• Unstructured (In-depth) Interview: Open-ended and conversational. Allows the
respondent to guide the discussion.
• Focus Group Discussion (FGD): Group interview with 6-12 participants. Generates
collective insights and group dynamics.

12.1 Advantages of Interview

47. Rich, in-depth data: Allows for comprehensive exploration of complex issues beyond
what questionnaires can capture.
48. Flexibility: The interviewer can probe further, clarify questions, and follow interesting
leads.
49. High response rate: Face-to-face or telephone interviews typically yield higher
response rates than questionnaires.
50. Observation opportunities: The interviewer can observe body language, tone, and
other non-verbal cues.
51. Clarification: Respondents can ask for clarification on questions, reducing
misunderstandings.
52. Suitable for complex topics: Can handle sensitive or complex issues that require
nuanced responses.
53. Captures emotions and experiences: Particularly useful for exploring lived
experiences and personal narratives.
54. Accessibility: Can be used with illiterate respondents who cannot complete written
questionnaires.

12.2 Disadvantages of Interview

55. Time-consuming: Each interview may take 30 minutes to several hours, and
transcribing is lengthy.
56. Expensive: Requires trained interviewers and may involve travel costs.
57. Interviewer bias: The interviewer's demeanor, appearance, or phrasing may influence
responses.
58. Social desirability bias: Respondents may give socially acceptable answers rather
than honest ones.
59. Small sample sizes: The time and cost limit the number of interviews that can be
conducted.
60. Analysis challenges: Qualitative interview data is difficult and time-consuming to
analyze.
61. Transcription errors: Transcribing recorded interviews may introduce errors.
62. Scheduling difficulties: Coordinating interview times with busy professionals can be
challenging.
13. Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process of systematically applying statistical and logical techniques to
describe, illustrate, condense, and evaluate data. It transforms raw data into meaningful
information to answer research questions and test hypotheses.

13.1 Ten Key Points of Data Analysis

63. Data Preparation and Cleaning: Before analysis, data must be checked for errors,
missing values, and inconsistencies. Cleaning involves correcting or removing
inaccurate records from the dataset.
64. Descriptive Statistics: Use measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and
dispersion (standard deviation, range) to summarize and describe data
characteristics.
65. Appropriate Statistical Tests: Select statistical tests based on the research question,
type of data, and number of variables (e.g., t-test for comparing two groups, ANOVA
for multiple groups, chi-square for categorical data).
66. Testing Assumptions: Before applying parametric tests, check that assumptions are
met (normality, homogeneity of variance, independence).
67. Qualitative Data Analysis: For qualitative data, use thematic analysis, content
analysis, or grounded theory to identify patterns, themes, and meanings.
68. Reliability and Validity: Assess the reliability of instruments (Cronbach's Alpha) and
the validity of measures before interpreting results.
69. Interpretation of Results: Interpret findings in the context of the research questions,
hypotheses, and existing literature. Avoid overinterpretation.
70. Significance Levels: Set the significance level (usually p < 0.05) before analysis and
interpret p-values in context, not in isolation.
71. Data Visualization: Use tables, charts, and graphs to present data clearly and
effectively. Visuals aid in understanding patterns and trends.
72. Triangulation: Cross-validate findings using multiple data sources, methods, or
researchers to enhance credibility and trustworthiness.
14. Types of Research Report and Factors for
Classification
Types of Research Reports:
1. Technical Report: A detailed report written for a technical or academic audience. It
contains all aspects of the research including methodology, statistical analyses, and detailed
findings.
2. Popular Report: Written for a general, non-technical audience. It simplifies findings and
avoids technical jargon. Focus is on practical implications.
3. Interim Report: Produced during an ongoing study to report on progress made so far.
Often required by funding agencies or supervisors.
4. Summary Report: A condensed version of the full research report. Highlights key
findings, conclusions, and recommendations.
5. Thesis/Dissertation: An academic report submitted for a degree requirement. Follows a
prescribed structure and is subject to examination.
6. Journal Article: A peer-reviewed publication summarizing key aspects of a study for the
academic community.
7. Policy Brief: A short document aimed at policymakers, translating research findings into
policy recommendations.

Factors for Classification of Research Reports:

• Audience: Technical, academic, or general public.
• Purpose: Dissemination, policy influence, academic fulfillment, or organizational
decision-making.
• Length: Summary reports vs. full technical reports.
• Depth: Degree of detail and technical rigor.
• Format: Prescribed formats for journals, dissertations, or institutional reports.
• Stage: Interim (in-progress) vs. final reports.
• Sponsorship: Reports for funding agencies may have specific requirements.
15. Stage 5 and Stage 6 of Research Process
Stage 5: Data Collection
Data collection is the process of gathering information from relevant sources to answer
research questions and test hypotheses. It is carried out according to the research design
and using the selected instruments.

Key Activities in Stage 5:

73. Finalizing and pre-testing data collection instruments (questionnaires, interview
guides).
74. Training data collectors (enumerators, research assistants).
75. Gaining access to the field (securing permissions, consent).
76. Administering instruments to the selected sample.
77. Recording and securing collected data.
78. Monitoring data quality during collection.

Stage 6: Data Analysis and Interpretation

After data collection, the researcher processes and analyzes the data to extract meaning
and draw conclusions. This stage transforms raw data into findings.

Key Activities in Stage 6:

79. Data entry and coding (for quantitative data) or transcription (for qualitative data).
80. Data cleaning and preparation.
81. Applying descriptive and inferential statistical analyses.
82. Conducting qualitative analysis (thematic analysis, content analysis).
83. Testing hypotheses and answering research questions.
84. Interpreting results in the context of the theoretical framework and literature review.
85. Identifying patterns, trends, relationships, and anomalies.
86. Drawing conclusions and formulating recommendations.
16. Reliability and Validity
Reliability
Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of a research instrument or measurement. A
reliable instrument produces consistent results when used repeatedly under the same
conditions.
Types of reliability:
• Test-Retest Reliability: Consistency of results when the same instrument is applied to
the same subjects at two different times.
• Inter-rater Reliability: Consistency of measurements when different observers or
raters assess the same phenomenon.
• Internal Consistency (Cronbach's Alpha): The degree to which items on a scale
measure the same construct. Alpha > 0.7 is generally acceptable.
• Parallel Forms Reliability: Consistency between two equivalent versions of the same
instrument.

Validity
Validity refers to the degree to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure.
It ensures that research findings accurately reflect the concepts being studied.
Types of validity:
• Content Validity: The extent to which the instrument covers all aspects of the concept
being measured. Ensured through expert review.
• Construct Validity: The degree to which the instrument measures the theoretical
construct it purports to measure.
• Face Validity: The superficial appearance that the instrument measures what it is
supposed to measure.
• Criterion-related Validity: Compares instrument results with an external criterion.
Includes concurrent and predictive validity.
• Internal Validity: The extent to which the study design accurately establishes causal
relationships.
• External Validity: The extent to which findings can be generalized beyond the study
setting.
17. Ethical Considerations
Research ethics govern the conduct of research to protect participants, ensure integrity, and
maintain public trust in research. Key ethical principles include:
87. Informed Consent: Participants must be fully informed about the study and voluntarily
agree to participate. Consent must be documented.
88. Confidentiality: Participants' identities and responses must be kept confidential. Data
should be anonymized where possible.
89. Privacy: Researchers must respect participants' right to privacy and only collect data
that is necessary for the study.
90. Voluntary Participation: Participation must be voluntary, and participants must be free
to withdraw at any time without penalty.
91. Avoiding Harm (Non-maleficence): Research should not cause physical,
psychological, social, or economic harm to participants.
92. Beneficence: Research should benefit society and participants, or at least not harm
them.
93. Justice: Benefits and burdens of research should be distributed fairly. Vulnerable
populations should not be disproportionately burdened.
94. Honesty and Integrity: Researchers must report findings honestly and transparently,
without fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.
95. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval: Research involving human subjects must
be reviewed and approved by an ethics committee.
96. Debriefing: Participants should be informed of the study's purpose and findings after
data collection.
18. Mathematical Testing of Validity in Research
Validity can be assessed mathematically using various statistical measures:
1. Content Validity Index (CVI): Calculated by having experts rate each item for relevance
on a 4-point scale. The proportion of items rated 3 or 4 (relevant) by at least 80% of experts
gives the CVI. CVI > 0.80 indicates good content validity.
2. Factor Analysis: Used to assess construct validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
identifies the underlying factor structure, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) tests
whether a hypothesized structure fits the data.
3. Convergent Validity: Measured using Average Variance Extracted (AVE). AVE > 0.50
indicates that the construct explains more than half the variance of its indicators.
4. Discriminant Validity: Assessed by comparing AVE values with the squared correlations
between constructs. AVE of each construct should exceed the squared correlations with
other constructs.
5. Criterion Validity (Pearson Correlation): Measured by correlating instrument scores
with a gold standard criterion. A high correlation (r > 0.7) indicates good criterion validity.
6. Cronbach's Alpha (for reliability supporting validity): Formula: α = (k/(k-1)) × (1 -
Σσ²i/σ²t), where k = number of items, σ²i = variance of each item, σ²t = total score variance.
Alpha ≥ 0.70 is the accepted threshold.
19. Triangulation
19.1 Meaning of Triangulation
Triangulation is a research strategy that involves using multiple methods, data sources,
investigators, or theories to cross-check and validate research findings. The term comes
from navigation, where the position of an object is determined by taking bearings from two or
more reference points.
Triangulation enhances the credibility, validity, and comprehensiveness of research findings
by ensuring that conclusions are not dependent on a single method or perspective.

19.2 Types of Triangulation

1. Data Triangulation: Uses multiple data sources (different times, places, or people) to
verify findings. Example: Collecting data from healthcare workers, patients, and
administrators.
2. Investigator/Researcher Triangulation: Uses multiple researchers to collect or analyze
the same data, reducing individual bias. Example: Two researchers independently coding
qualitative interview data.
3. Theory Triangulation: Applies multiple theoretical frameworks to interpret the same data.
Example: Using both TAM and Innovation Diffusion Theory to analyze EHR adoption.
4. Methodological Triangulation: Uses multiple methods (e.g., questionnaires + interviews
+ observation) to study the same phenomenon. Most common in mixed methods research.
5. Environmental Triangulation: Collects data in different settings or locations to test
whether findings are consistent across contexts.
20. Pilot Test
20.1 Meaning of Pilot Test
A pilot test (also called a pre-test) is a small-scale preliminary study conducted before the
main research to evaluate the feasibility, adequacy, and reliability of the research
instruments and procedures. It involves administering the research instruments
(questionnaires, interview guides) to a small sample that is similar to the main study sample
but not included in it.

20.2 Importance of Pilot Test

97. Identifies ambiguous or unclear questions that may confuse respondents.
98. Tests the reliability and validity of research instruments before full deployment.
99. Estimates the time required for respondents to complete questionnaires or
interviews.
100. Identifies logistical problems in data collection procedures.
101. Allows for refinement and improvement of research instruments.
102. Helps the researcher practice data collection procedures.
103. Provides preliminary data to assess whether the planned sample size is
adequate.
104. Identifies missing variables or questions that should be added.
105. Reduces the risk of major problems during the main data collection phase.
106. Enhances the quality and credibility of the final research findings.
21. Sample Size Determination
Sample size determination is the process of calculating the appropriate number of
participants needed to produce statistically valid and reliable results. The sample must be
large enough to detect significant effects and generalize findings to the population.

21.1 Methods of Calculating Sample Size

1. Krejcie and Morgan Formula (1970): One of the most commonly used formulas for
determining sample size from a known population:
s = X²NP(1-P) / d²(N-1) + X²P(1-P)
Where: s = required sample size, X² = chi-square value for 1 df at confidence level (3.841
at 95%), N = population size, P = population proportion (0.5 for maximum variability), d =
degree of accuracy (0.05).
2. Slovin's Formula: n = N / (1 + Ne²), where n = sample size, N = population size, e =
margin of error (0.05 or 0.10).
3. Yamane's Formula: Similar to Slovin's; n = N / (1 + N(e)²). Commonly used in social
science research.
4. Cochran's Formula (for unknown population): n = Z²pq / e², where Z = z-value (1.96
for 95% confidence), p = estimated proportion, q = 1-p, e = margin of error.
5. Power Analysis: Determines sample size based on the desired statistical power (typically
0.80), effect size, and significance level. Tools like G*Power software are used.
6. Rule of Thumb Methods: For regression: at least 10 participants per predictor variable.
For factor analysis: at least 5-10 participants per variable.
22. Nuremberg Agreement (Nuremberg Code)
The Nuremberg Code (1947) is a set of ethical principles governing human experimentation,
formulated after the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial following World War II. It was a response to
the horrific medical experiments conducted on concentration camp prisoners by Nazi
doctors.
Key Principles of the Nuremberg Code:
107. Voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
108. The experiment must yield fruitful results for the good of society and not be
achievable by other methods.
109. The experiment must be based on previous animal experiments and scientific
knowledge.
110. All unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury must be avoided.
111. No experiment should be conducted where there is prior reason to believe it
will cause death or disabling injury.
112. The risk must never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem to be
solved.
113. Proper preparations must be made to protect the subject against remote
possibilities of injury or death.
114. Only scientifically qualified persons should conduct experiments.
115. The human subject must be free to bring the experiment to an end at any
time.
116. The scientist must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any point if
harm is anticipated.
The Nuremberg Code laid the foundation for modern research ethics, including the
Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and institutional review board systems worldwide.
23. Falsification and Fabrication
Fabrication
Fabrication is the invention of data, results, or findings that were never actually collected or
observed. It involves making up research data, results, or documentation. It is one of the
most serious forms of research misconduct.
Examples of fabrication:
• Inventing responses to questionnaires that were never administered.
• Reporting the results of experiments that were never conducted.
• Creating fake participant data in a clinical trial.

Falsification
Falsification involves manipulating research processes, data, equipment, or results, or
changing and omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented.
Examples of falsification:
• Altering data points to achieve a desired statistical result.
• Changing the description of methodology after the fact.
• Selectively omitting data that contradicts the hypothesis.
• Manipulating images or graphs to misrepresent findings.

Consequences:
• Retraction of published work.
• Loss of credibility and academic reputation.
• Legal consequences and disciplinary action.
• Harm to public trust in research.
• In medical research, potential harm to patients.
24. Types of Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of presenting someone else's work, ideas, or words as one's own
without proper attribution. It is a serious ethical violation in academic and research contexts.
1. Direct/Verbatim Plagiarism: Copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation
marks or citation.
2. Paraphrasing Plagiarism: Restating another's ideas in different words without crediting
the original author.
3. Self-Plagiarism: Reusing one's own previously published work without acknowledgment
or permission from the original publisher.
4. Mosaic Plagiarism (Patchwriting): Mixing copied phrases with original text without
proper citation, creating a patchwork of borrowed and original content.
5. Accidental Plagiarism: Unintentional plagiarism resulting from careless note-taking,
improper citation, or unawareness of citation rules.
6. Source-based Plagiarism: Citing a secondary source as if it were the primary source,
without accessing the original.
7. Complete Plagiarism: Submitting another person's entire work as one's own (e.g.,
purchasing an essay).
8. Idea Plagiarism: Stealing the concept or idea of another without credit, even if the words
are completely changed.
9. Data Plagiarism: Using another researcher's dataset or findings without authorization or
citation.
10. Structural Plagiarism: Following the organizational structure or argument outline of
another's work too closely.
25. Ethical Issues for Research and Respondents
Ethical Issues for Researchers:
117. Intellectual Honesty: Reporting findings truthfully without distortion.
118. Avoiding Conflicts of Interest: Declaring and managing any interests that
could bias the research.
119. Proper Attribution: Giving credit to all contributors and sources.
120. Data Integrity: Collecting, storing, and reporting data accurately.
121. Transparency: Clearly reporting research methods, limitations, and potential
biases.
122. Respecting Intellectual Property: Not using others' work without permission.
123. Avoiding Dual Publication: Not publishing the same research in multiple
journals without disclosure.

Ethical Issues for Respondents:

124. Right to Informed Consent: Respondents must receive full information about
the study and agree to participate.
125. Right to Privacy: Personal information must be protected from unauthorized
disclosure.
126. Right to Confidentiality: Responses must not be linked to the respondent's
identity.
127. Right to Withdraw: Respondents can exit the study at any time without
consequence.
128. Protection from Harm: Respondents must not be exposed to psychological,
physical, or social harm.
129. Right to Debrief: Respondents should be informed of the study's actual
purpose after participation if deception was involved.
130. Protection of Vulnerable Groups: Extra care for children, elderly, mentally ill,
and other vulnerable populations.
26. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Research
Aspect Qualitative Quantitative Mixed Methods
Nature Exploratory, Confirmatory, objective Both exploratory and
interpretive confirmatory
Data Type Words, images, Numbers, statistics Both types
narratives
Purpose Understanding Testing hypotheses, Comprehensive
meaning and measuring understanding
experience
Methods Interviews, FGDs, Surveys, experiments Combination of both
observation
Sample Size Small, purposive Large, random Depends on design
Analysis Thematic, content Statistical analysis Both analytical
analysis approaches
Validity Credibility, Internal/external validity Triangulation enhances
transferability validity
Philosophy Interpretivist/ Positivist/Post-positivist Pragmatist
Constructivist
Strengths Rich, contextual Generalizability, Comprehensive,
insights replicability complementary
Weaknesses Subjectivity, small May miss contextual Complex and time-
samples nuances consuming
27. Research Philosophy Diagram
The research philosophy diagram represents the layered conceptual framework that
underpins any research study, from broad philosophical assumptions to specific research
methods.

27.1 Philosophy
Philosophy provides the overarching worldview and assumptions about the nature of reality
and knowledge. It encompasses ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform all
research decisions. The main research philosophies are: Positivism, Post-positivism,
Interpretivism, Constructivism, Pragmatism, and Critical Realism.

27.2 Ontology
Ontology is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of reality and existence. It
asks: 'What is the nature of reality?' Key ontological positions include:
• Realism: Reality exists independently of human perception.
• Nominalism: Reality is constructed through language and concepts.
• Subjectivism: Reality is constructed by individual experiences and perceptions.

27.3 Epistemology
Epistemology is the study of knowledge, asking 'How do we know what we know?' and
'What constitutes valid knowledge?' Key positions include:
• Positivism: Knowledge is based on observable, measurable facts. Scientific method
is the only valid way to gain knowledge.
• Interpretivism: Knowledge is subjective and constructed through social interaction
and interpretation.
• Pragmatism: Knowledge is evaluated by its practical consequences; uses whatever
works.

27.4 Research
Research is the systematic investigation of phenomena to produce knowledge. It is guided
by philosophical assumptions, theoretical frameworks, and methodological choices. The
research process translates philosophical assumptions into practical methods.

27.5 Inductive Approach

The inductive approach moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and
theories. It begins with data collection, identifies patterns and themes, and generates theory
from the findings. Associated with qualitative research and interpretivist philosophy.
Process: Observations → Patterns → Tentative Hypothesis → Theory.

27.6 Deductive Approach

The deductive approach moves from theory to specific hypotheses to data collection and
verification. It tests existing theories by formulating hypotheses and collecting data to confirm
or refute them. Associated with quantitative research and positivist philosophy.
Process: Theory → Hypothesis → Observation/Data → Confirmation or Rejection.
27.7 Theory
Theory is a set of interrelated concepts, definitions, and propositions that presents a
systematic view of phenomena by specifying relationships among variables. Theory guides
research design, provides explanatory frameworks, and is tested, refined, or extended
through research.

27.8 Return to Philosophy

Research findings eventually return to inform philosophical debates. When research
generates new understanding, it may challenge or extend existing philosophical
assumptions, leading to paradigm shifts or theoretical revisions.

27.9 Research Paradigms

A research paradigm is a set of beliefs, values, and practices shared by a scientific
community. Major research paradigms include:
Positivism: Reality is objective and can be measured. Research is value-free, uses
quantitative methods, and seeks to generalize findings.
Post-positivism: Acknowledges that perfect objectivity is impossible. Reality is partially
subjective but can be approximated through rigorous methods.
Interpretivism/Constructivism: Reality is socially constructed. Research seeks to
understand subjective meaning through qualitative methods.
Critical Theory: Research should challenge and transform existing social structures and
power relations.
Pragmatism: Research is guided by practical consequences. Mixed methods are
encouraged, and the research question drives method selection.
28. The 5Cs of Literature Review
The 5Cs framework provides a structured approach to writing and evaluating a literature
review:
1. Cite: Properly acknowledge and reference the sources you use. Cite all ideas, theories,
findings, and models that are not your own. Proper citation avoids plagiarism and gives
credit to original authors.
2. Compare: Identify similarities and differences between different studies, theories, and
findings. Comparing sources demonstrates your analytical ability and helps identify patterns
and contradictions in the literature.
3. Contrast: Highlight the differences and disagreements between authors. Contrasting
shows that you understand the complexity of the field and that the literature is not monolithic.
4. Critique: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of existing studies. Critique involves
assessing methodological limitations, sample biases, contextual factors, and gaps in the
literature.
5. Connect: Link existing literature to your own research. Show how the reviewed literature
informs your study, provides context for your research problem, and supports your
methodology and theoretical framework.
A strong literature review goes beyond summarizing studies — it synthesizes and integrates
findings to build a coherent argument that leads to identifying the research gap that your
study addresses.
29. The 7Cs of Consultancy
The 7Cs of Consultancy represent the key qualities and competencies that effective
consultants must demonstrate. They also provide a framework for evaluating the quality of
consultancy services:
1. Competence: The consultant must possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and
expertise in the relevant field. Competence is the foundation of effective consultancy.
2. Confidence: Consultants must project confidence in their abilities and recommendations.
Confidence inspires trust in clients and enables effective communication of findings.
3. Commitment: The consultant must be fully committed to the client's goals and to
delivering high-quality work within agreed timelines.
4. Communication: Clear, effective, and appropriate communication at all levels — written
reports, presentations, and interpersonal communication — is essential in consultancy.
5. Creative Problem-Solving: Consultants must think innovatively to develop unique and
practical solutions to complex problems. Creativity differentiates excellent consultants from
average ones.
6. Confidentiality: Consultants must maintain strict confidentiality of client information and
findings. Breaching confidentiality is a serious ethical violation that can damage both client
and consultant.
7. Character/Credibility: Ethical character and professional integrity are essential.
Consultants must be honest, transparent, and maintain high professional standards to build
and maintain credibility.
30. References
Adane, K., Muluye, D., & Teklehaimanot, S. (2019). Impact of electronic health records on
patient safety in Africa: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making,
19(1), 1-12.
Bawack, R. E., Wamba, S. F., & Carillo, K. D. A. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence and
big data for human resources management. Journal of Enterprise Information Management,
34(6), 1665-1701.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Kimaro, H. C., & Nhampossa, J. L. (2018). Barriers to electronic health record adoption in
Tanzania public hospitals. Health Informatics Journal, 24(3), 285-298.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age
International.
Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children (MoHCDGEC).
(2021). Tanzania digital health strategy 2021-2026. Government of Tanzania.
Mutinga, M., Odhiambo, D., & Were, M. (2020). Electronic health records implementation in
Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Journal of Health Informatics in Africa, 7(1), 1-15.
Mwagomba, B. M., Ameh, S., Bongomin, P., Juma, P., MacKenzie, R. K., Nkhoma, D., ... &
Klipstein-Grobusch, K. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of electronic health records in
African countries. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 81(1), 64-71.
Nuremberg Code. (1947). Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals
under Control Council Law No. 10. US Government Printing Office.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2016). Non-
federal acute care hospital EHR adoption. US Department of Health and Human Services.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students
(8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical
research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194.