CHAPTER FIVE

Xamse muuse axmed yasiin

JULY 4, 2026
CIVIL SERVICE INSTITUTE
Id: 4644
CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conclusion of the Study

This study examined freedom of expression in constitutional theory, balancing democratic values
and legitimate limitations in Hargeisa, Somaliland, with the objective of assessing the
constitutional foundations of freedom of expression, its democratic significance, the legitimacy of
its limitations, and the practical challenges affecting its implementation. The findings demonstrate
that the study successfully achieved its objectives and adequately addressed the research problem.
Regarding the first objective, the findings indicate that respondents generally believe the
Constitution of Somaliland provides legal recognition and protection for freedom of expression.
However, the study also found that public understanding of these constitutional guarantees remains
limited, and concerns persist regarding the consistent and equal application of these protections in
practice. Concerning the second objective, the findings reveal a strong consensus that freedom of
expression is an indispensable democratic principle that promotes public participation in
governance, strengthens democratic institutions, enhances political awareness, and enables
citizens to hold public officials accountable. These findings confirm that freedom of expression is
widely regarded as an essential foundation for democratic governance and active citizenship in
Somaliland. With respect to the third objective, the study established that respondents recognize
the necessity of legitimate limitations on freedom of expression, provided that such limitations are
imposed in accordance with constitutional principles, the rule of law, and the protection of public
interests without unnecessarily restricting fundamental rights. This demonstrates that respondents
support an appropriate balance between protecting individual freedoms and safeguarding
legitimate societal interests. Finally, regarding the fourth objective, the study concludes that
significant practical challenges continue to hinder the effective realization of freedom of
expression in Hargeisa. Institutional weaknesses, political influence, societal attitudes, cultural
norms, and concerns regarding the effectiveness of courts and legal institutions were identified as
major obstacles affecting the enforcement of constitutional protections. Overall, the study
concludes that although Somaliland possesses an encouraging constitutional framework
supporting freedom of expression, greater efforts are required to strengthen institutional capacity,
improve legal enforcement, increase public constitutional awareness, and promote a democratic
culture that fully respects and protects freedom of expression in practice.

5.2 Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are proposed:

1. Strengthen public constitutional awareness: The Government of Somaliland, in collaboration

with the Ministry of Education, universities, the Somaliland National Human Rights Commission,
and civil society organizations, should implement continuous public education and civic awareness
programmes on constitutional rights, particularly freedom of expression. These programmes
should utilize schools, universities, traditional media, social media platforms, and community
forums to improve public understanding of constitutional protections and citizens' rights.

2. Improve institutional capacity for protecting freedom of expression: Government institutions

responsible for protecting constitutional rights should strengthen their institutional capacity
through policy reforms, adequate financial support, professional training, and improved
administrative independence. Capacity-building programmes should particularly target law
enforcement agencies and public institutions responsible for implementing constitutional
guarantees in order to ensure fair and consistent protection of freedom of expression.

3. Promote judicial independence and effective enforcement: The Judiciary should continue
strengthening judicial independence while enhancing the capacity of judges, prosecutors, and legal
practitioners through specialized training on constitutional law, human rights standards, and
freedom of expression jurisprudence. Courts should ensure that constitutional guarantees are
interpreted consistently and that violations of freedom of expression are addressed promptly and
impartially.

4. Minimize political interference in the exercise of freedom of expression: Political leaders and
public institutions should uphold constitutional principles by ensuring that governmental authority
is not used to interfere with lawful public expression, media independence, or peaceful criticism.
Transparent legal procedures should govern any restrictions on freedom of expression to ensure
accountability and public confidence in democratic governance.
5. Encourage responsible exercise of freedom of expression: Civil society organizations,
educational institutions, media organizations, and community leaders should promote responsible
civic engagement by encouraging citizens to exercise freedom of expression respectfully, ethically,
and in accordance with constitutional values. Public awareness campaigns should emphasize that
freedom of expression carries corresponding responsibilities toward protecting the rights and
dignity of others.

6. Strengthen legal and policy implementation: Although constitutional protections exist, relevant
government institutions should regularly review laws, policies, and implementation mechanisms
to ensure they effectively protect freedom of expression while maintaining legitimate
constitutional limitations. Clear implementation guidelines should be developed to promote
consistency, transparency, and respect for the rule of law.

5.3 Further Research

This study focused on balancing democratic values and legitimate limitations of freedom of
expression in Hargeisa, Somaliland. However, several issues emerged that require further scholarly
investigation. Future researchers should conduct comparative studies examining the
implementation of freedom of expression across different regions of Somaliland to determine
whether similar constitutional and institutional challenges exist beyond Hargeisa. Additional
research should examine the effectiveness of the judiciary in protecting freedom of expression
through detailed case law analysis and judicial decision-making. Future studies may also
investigate the relationship between media freedom and democratic governance in Somaliland, as
well as the influence of social media on the exercise and protection of freedom of expression.
Furthermore, researchers may explore public awareness of constitutional rights among different
population groups, including students, journalists, civil society organizations, and rural
communities, in order to identify effective strategies for strengthening constitutional literacy.
Finally, future studies employing qualitative or mixed-method research designs could provide a
deeper understanding of the practical experiences of judges, lawyers, journalists, policymakers,
and citizens regarding the protection and limitation of freedom of expression in Somaliland.
5.4 References

1. A. (2018). Islam, clan and the state in Somaliland. African Affairs, 117(469), 623–641.
2. Bickel, A. M. (1962). The least dangerous branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of politics.
Yale University Press.
3. Bonotti, M., & Nwokora, Z. (2025). Free speech and social change: A public reason approach.
Contemporary Political Theory, 24, 669–689. [Link]
4. Bonotti, M., & Seglow, J. (2021). Freedom of expression. Philosophy Compass, 16(7), e12759.
[Link]
5. Bonotti, M., & Seglow, J. (2021). Freedom of expression. Polity.
6. Brest, P. (1980). The misconceived quest for the original understanding. Boston University
Law Review, 60(2), 204–238.
7. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
8. Chairperson. (2024). Annual review of human rights. Hargeisa.
9. Chambers, S. (2017). Deliberation and mass democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge
(Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Where are we now? (pp. 52–71). Cambridge University Press.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
11. Dolunay, A., & Karatepe, F. (2017). Freedom of mass communication in the digital age in the
case of the internet. [Journal not specified].
12. dos Santos Silva, N., & De Oliveira, M. (2025). Balancing constitutional principles: An
analysis of freedom of expression in light of balancing theory in the context of cybercrime and
digital cancellation. [Journal not specified].
13. Dyzenhaus, D., & Thorburn, M. (Eds.). (2016). Philosophical foundations of constitutional
law (pp. 45–67). Oxford University Press.
14. Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights (pp. 23–55). Oxford University Press.
15. Gera, A. (2024). The right to freedom of expression and its limitations according to Albanian
legislation. Academic Journal of Business, Administration Law and Social Sciences, 10(1), 42–
50.
16. Ghanem, R. (2022). Limitations of the right to freedom of expression: Evaluation and
justification [Doctoral dissertation, University of Miskolc].
17. Ghanem, R. (2024). Theoretical framework of the right to freedom of expression [Doctoral
 dissertation, University of Miskolc].
18. Ghanem, R. (2024). Limitations of the right to freedom of expression [Doctoral dissertation,
University of Miskolc].
19. Ginsburg, T., & Huq, A. Z. (2018). How to save a constitutional democracy (pp. 23–41, 88–
107). University of Chicago Press.
20. Gunatilleke, G. (2021). Justifying limitations on the freedom of expression. Human Rights
Review, 22(1), 91–108. [Link]
21. Haji-Ali Ahmed, A. (2014). Media industry in Somaliland: The current practice and its law and
other regulatory frameworks. Somaliland Current.
22. Hassan, T. A. (2015). A jurisprudential analysis of freedom of expression [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Queensland]. [Link]
23. Hersi, M. F. (2019). Rule of law and judicial independence in Somaliland. African Journal of
Legal Studies, 12(1), 45–68.
24. Howie, E. (2018). Protecting the human right to freedom of expression in international law.
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 12–15.
25. Human Rights Watch. (2026). World report: Somaliland & Somalia section.
[Link]
26. Jackson, V. C., & Tushnet, M. (2019). Comparative constitutional law (3rd ed., pp. 402–438).
Foundation Press.
27. Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law (M. Knight, Trans., pp. 193–221). University of
California Press. (Original work published 1960)
28. Kenyon, A. T., Svensson, E. M., & Edström, M. (2017). Building and sustaining freedom of
expression: Considering Sweden. Nordicom Review, 38(1), 31–45.
[Link]
29. Kratou, H., & Laakso, L. (2022). The impact of academic freedom on democracy in Africa.
The Journal of Development Studies, 58(4), 809–826.
30. Masferrer, A. (2023). The decline of freedom of expression and social vulnerability in Western
democracy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 1443–1475.
[Link]
31. Manyuon, G. P., & Mawien, D. (2025). The stakeholders' views on the media authority. Indian
Journal of Mass Communication and Journalism (IJMCJ), 9.
32. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th
ed.). Pearson.
33. Omaar, R. (2017). Civil society and democratic participation in Somaliland. Horn of Africa
Bulletin, 29(2), 14–22.
34. Post, R. (2019). Democracy and freedom of expression. In L. C. Bollinger & G. R. Stone
(Eds.), The free speech century (pp. 27–45). Oxford University Press.
35. Reporters Without Borders (RSF). (2026). Somaliland/Somalia country report.
[Link]
36. Scalia, A. (1997). A matter of interpretation: Federal courts and the law (pp. 37–47). Princeton
University Press.
37. Sen, S. (2010). Right to free speech and censorship: A jurisprudential analysis. JSTOR.
[Link]
38. Shafiq, T. (2025). The practice of freedom of expression in France. Research Consortium
Archive, 17.
39. Somaliland Lawyers Association (SOLLA). (2022). Register of lawyers in Maroodi Jeex
region. SOLLA.
40. Strauss, D. A. (2010). The living constitution (pp. 1–35). Oxford University Press.
41. Thowsen, M., & Krøvel, R. (Eds.). (2019). Making transparency possible: An interdisciplinary
dialogue. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
42. Tushnet, M. (1991). Critical legal studies: A political history. Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1515–
1544.
43. V-Dem Institute. (2024). Democracy report 2024: Democracy winning and losing at the ballot.
University of Gothenburg.
44. Zukić, M., & Zukić, A. (2025). Freedom of speech and expression: Legal, theoretical, and
cultural review. MAP Social Sciences, 6, 10–21.