Humanize

Abstract
This paper investigates the effectiveness of foreign aid and socioeconomic
development of country Bangladesh. Unlike many previous studies that focus on
economic growth, this paper focus on Socioeconomic development. Although
foreign aid is considered as an important source of finance of an economy,but its
effectiveness in improving socioeconomic development remains an important
issue. Bangladesh is still a foreign aid dependent country.
To do this we examine whether aid flow have a positive impact on HDI or not. In
this research , we use Human Development Index(HDI) as dependent variable ,
which represent quality of life and consider independent variable Foreign Aid,
Foreign Direct Investment, Trade Openness, Gross Domestic Product which
represent effectiveness of foreign aid on socioeconomic development. The
empirical analysis show that how foreign aid and socioeconomic development
from 1990 to 2023. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model is applied
to achieve the research objective and the emperical result which indicate
effectiveness of foreign aid on socioeconomic development of Bangladesh. For
better utilization of foreign aid , Foreign Direct Investment must be coordinate
properly with administration framework. Government of Bangladesh should need
to ensure proper use of resources and Foreign Aid.

The research also show that the contribution of Foreign Direct Investment…[]
This study show that

Introduction
Bangladesh is a developing country. Foreign Aid play a very important role in
economic development of Bangladesh. But there is a heavy debate about the
efficient use of this foreign [Link] evidence shows that Foreign aid has a
positive impact on GDP growth of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh is classified by the World Bank as a Lower-Middle-Income

country(LIMC). It will graduate from the United Nations ”Least Developed
Country” scheduled for November 24, 2026. This represent a historical economic
shift of Bangladesh by recognizing the nation’s progress in per capita income ,
human assets and economic resilience. This milestone represents economic
progress of Bangladesh.

As a LDC country Bangladesh enjoy Quota free and duty free market access. After
graduation , Bangladesh will face competition and standard tariff rates in export
sector (especially Ready Made Garments) in the Wesrtern Market.

Bangladesh is an independent country. It become independent in 1971. After the

liberation war end, the economy of Bangladesh face great economic challenge of
administration Build, post war diplomacy, international recognition, ending
poverty. To solve this problem ,Bangladesh get Foreign aid . Foreign aid help by
solving this economic challenges. From independent to recent time , still now
Bangladesh is dependent on this foreign aid directly and also indirectly. Though
this foreign aid help an economy for longterm growth, but dependency create
great challenge for effictive development.
Foreign Aid help bangladesh for sustainable development of bangladesh.

Recent figures show

For many years, foreign aid has been seen as an essential source of external
financing for developing countries, especially those lacking internal means of
resources and investment capital. In the period following its independence in
1971, Bangladesh has got a good deal of Official Development Assistance (ODA)
from bilateral as well as multilateral development agencies with an aim to boost
the economy, fight poverty, and invest in infrastructure, education, health, and
social services. Over the past few decades, this nation has achieved much in the
field of improving different socio-economic parameters like life expectancy,
education levels, and income, as evident from the steady increase in Human
Development Index (HDI). Nevertheless, in spite of the great amount of foreign
aid that this country receives, the degree of influence of this aid on the process of
socio-economic development raises a discussion between researchers and
policymakers. While one group of scholars believes in the role of foreign aid as a
driver of sustainable development, as it is based on investing in productive
activities and human capital development, another group claims otherwise.

In light of the above context, it is essential to determine if there has been any
contribution of foreign aid towards the socio-economic development of
Bangladesh. Despite the fact that past literature has analyzed the effect of foreign
aid on economic growth, fewer studies have considered socio-economic
development measured by Human Development Index. Furthermore, findings of
past literature are ambiguous; whereas some literature suggests a positive impact
of foreign aid, some do not reveal any significant impact or sometimes even a
negative impact. This research paper intends to bridge this literature gap through
exploring the long-term and short-term impact of foreign aid on socio-economic
development in Bangladesh for the period of 1990 to 2023. The Human
Development Index (HDI) shall be used as a dependent variable, whereas the Net
Official Development Assistance (Net ODA) shall be used as an independent
variable. Besides, GDP growth rate, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), and Trade
Openness will also be taken into account as control variables since they are
considered to be significant for human development.
The results of this study are going to be useful for academic research and
policymaking. The provision of empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of
foreign aid in Bangladesh will help policymakers, development partners, and
government institutions develop an efficient strategy of aid allocation and
socioeconomic development policies. In addition, the contribution to existing
literature will come from using the ARDL model and FMOLS technique to test the
short-run and long-run relationships between variables. Empirical analysis will be
conducted on the basis of annually observed time-series data for the period from
1990 to 2023 from internationally reputable sources, such as the World Bank and
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The study will follow the goal
to evaluate the effectiveness of foreign aid in socioeconomic development in
Bangladesh, with the consideration of GDP growth, foreign direct investment, and
trade openness. Hence, the hypothesis tested in the empirical analysis will be
formulated as follows: there is no statistically significant relationship between
foreign aid and socioeconomic development in Bangladesh.

In general, the research conducted in this paper presents an extensive analysis of

the connection between foreign aid and socioeconomic development of
Bangladesh through the use of economic and development variables using an
econometric analysis framework. It is important to find out whether foreign aid
has been transformed into human development that would guarantee the proper
use of foreign aid and the realization of the development goals set by Bangladesh.
The results obtained from this research will be useful for making policies
regarding aid efficiency and further socioeconomic development of Bangladesh,
as well as for future researchers in other developing countries.

Chapter 2: Literature review

Authors Study Methods Study Findings
Indicators Countries
Helal Uddin Bangladesh

Positive Effect Study:

Negative Effect Study:
Chapter 3 Data Collection and Methodology
3.1 Introduction
In this chapter, the data sources, variables, model specification, and the
econometric technique have been introduced in order to assess the efficiency of
foreign aid towards socioeconomic development of Bangladesh. Time series data
for the years from 1990 to 2023 have been utilized in this research. The Human
Development Index (HDI) has been considered as an indicator for the
socioeconomic development in Bangladesh. Time series data have been used here
for the years from 1990 to 2023. Human Development Index (HDI) has been
considered as an indicator of socioeconomic development, whereas Net Official
Development Assistance (ODA), Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Trade Openness
and Economic Growth have been used as explanatory variables.

Sources of Data
Time series data has been collected for the years from 1990 to 2023 the World
Bank Development Indicators (World Bank, 2026). To show effectiveness of
Foreign Aid and Socio-economic development, the listed variables are taken given
in the table.
Table No.:Descriptions of the Variables
Variable Identity Logarithmic Information on Variable Type Source
Form the variables
Human lnHDI Composite index Dependent UNDP
Development measuring Database
Index health,
 education, and
living standards
(Scale 0–1)
Net ODA lnNetODA Net Official Independent World Bank
Received Development Indicator
Assistance (WDI)
received
(% of GNI)
Foreign Direct lnFDI Foreign Direct Independent
Investment(FDI) Investment, net
inflows(% of
GDP)
Trade lnTrade Trade(%of GDP) Independent
Openness
Gross Domestic lnGDP GDP Independent
Product (GDP) growth(annual%)

Data for this analysis were entirely derived from secondary sources available in
internationally acknowledged databases. Annual data for the period 1990-2023
have been collected from the World Development Indicators (WDI) database of
the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
The Human Development Index (HDI) data have been collected from the UNDP
Human Development Reports; whereas, Net ODA received (% of GNI), Foreign
Direct Investment net inflows (% of GDP), Trade (% of GDP) and GDP growth
(annual %) have been collected from the WDI database of the World Bank .

3.3 Description of Variables

Dependent Variable
Human Development Index (HDI)
HDI is a proxy variable for socioeconomic development. It is an index of human
development reflecting progress made in three fundamental aspects of human
development including health, education and standard of living. Higher the value
of HDI, higher would be the level of socioeconomic development.

Independent Variables
Net ODA Received (% of GNI)
Official Development Assistance is an indication of foreign assistance provided by
donor nations and international organizations in order to promote economic and
social development.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) (% of GDP)

Foreign direct investment is foreign investment done within domestic enterprises
and expected to lead to economic development due to capital formation,
technology transfer, and job creation.

Trade Openness (% of GDP)

The trade openness is defined as the share of exports and imports in the GDP. It is
hypothesized that the higher the trade openness, the more likely economic
growth and development.

GDP Growth (Annual %)

GDP growth rate is the annual percentage growth rate of gross domestic product.
Economic growth leads to development and higher living standards, as well as
better human development.

Table 3.1: Variables Used in the Study

Variabl Description Measurement

e

HDI Human Development Index Index

Net Official Development

NetODA % of GNI
Assistance

FDI Foreign Direct Investment % of GDP

Trade Trade Openness % of GDP

Annual % Growth
GDP Economic Growth
Rate

3.4 Model Specification

For testing the effects of foreign aid on the development process in Bangladesh,
the following functional form is specified:
HDI = f(NetODA, FDI, Trade, GDP)
The econometric model can be expressed as:
HDIₜ = β₀ + β₁NetODAₜ + β₂FDIₜ + β₃Tradeₜ + β₄GDPₜ + εₜ ……….. (1)
Where:
 HDI = Human Development Index
 NetODA = Net Official Development Assistance (% of GNI)
 FDI = Foreign Direct Investment (% of GDP)
 Trade = Trade Openness (% of GDP)
 GDP = Economic Growth (%)
 ε = Error term
 t = Time period
 Standard t P>|t| 95% [Link] Effect on
Variable Coefficient Significance
Error HDI

0.0547 -4.62 0.000 -0.364 0.1407 Significant at 1%

lnNetODA -0.2527 Negative
(p = 0.000)

0.0177 1.03 0.311 -0.0180 0.0546 Not significant (p

lnFDI 0.0183 Positive
= 0.311)

0.1061 -1.16 0.257 -0.3397 0.0944 Not significant (p

lnTrade -0.1226 Negative
= 0.257)

0.0881 1.89 0.068 -0.0134 0.3469 Significant at 10%

lnGDP 0.1667 Positive
only (p = 0.068)

0.3849 -0.89 0.381 -1.1299 0.4445 Not significant (p

Constant -0.3427 —
= 0.381)

Estimated Log-Log Regression Model

Since this is a log-log model, this coefficient represent elasticity. 1% change in
independent variable results, dependent variable HDI will change by β%, holding
all other variable constant.
Result Interpretation
In order to eliminate the problem of heteroscedasticity and calculate the
elasticities, all the variables were expressed in logarithmic form. The equation is
specified as:

εₜ……….. (2)
lnHDIₜ = β₀ + β₁lnNetODAₜ + β₂lnFDIₜ + β₃lnTradeₜ + β₄lnGDPₜ +

lnHDIₜ = -.3426927 + -.2526574lnNetODAₜ + .0183201lnFDIₜ +

εₜ……….. (3)
-.1226313lnTrade ₜ + .1667428lnGDPₜ +
Now we can interpret the result of the equation 4 by using the
OLS estimation on collected data.
Net ODA (β₁ = -0.2527)
β₁ shows the relationship between dependent variable HDI and independent
variable Net ODA of Bangladesh. This β₁ coefficient implies that if foreign aid (Net
ODA) increase by 1%, other thing remain constant, it will decrease HDI by 0.253%.
Which indicate that Human development index is strongly depend on Foreign
aid(NetODA). The p-value is less than 0.01 which indecates that it is statistically
significant at 1% level.

FDI (β2 = 0.0183)

β2 shows relationship between dependent variable HDI and independent variable
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) of Bangladesh. The coefficient of lnFDI indicates
that 1% increase in FDI results 0.018% increase in HDI, other thing remain
constant. β2 coefficient is statistically significant where t= 1.03 and p= 0.311. Since
p value is less than 0.05, so FDI effect on HDI is not statistically significant.

Trade(β₃ = -0.1226)
β₃ shows relationship between dependent variable HDI and independent variable
Trade Openness (Trade) of Bangladesh. The cofficient of lnTrade indicate that 1%
increase in Trade results 0.1226% decrease in HDI, other things remain constant.
β₃ coefficient is not statistically significant where t = -1.16 and p= 0.257. Since, p
value is more than 0.05, so Trade effect on HDI is not statistically significant.

GDP(β₄= 0.01667)
β₄ shows relationship between dependent variable HDI and independent variable
GDP of Bangladesh. The coefficient of lnGDP indicate that 1% increase in GDP
results 0.01667% increase in HDI, other things remain constant. β₄ coefficient is
statistically significant at 10% level where t= 1.89 and p= 0.068 but not statistically
significant at 5% level. Since the p value is less than 0.05 , so GDP statistically
significant. This result show weak evidence of a positive relationship between
GDP and HDI.

Constant(β₀= -0.3427)
β₀ is the intercept represent the expected value of lnHDI when all independent
variable(Net ODA, Foreign Direct Investment , Trade, GDP) are equal to 1. This
intercept is not statistically significant because p value = 0.381 that is less than
0.05 and it has limited economic interpretation.

Interpretation R2
The value of R2 is 0.7627 which implies that lnHDI can explain independent
variable (ln NetODA, lnFDI, lnTrade, lnGDP ) approximately 76.27% of variation.
The 23.73% of variation is explained by other factors included in the model and
random error. This suggests that the model has good explanatory power.

Interpretation F-statistics
The null hypothesis of F-statistics is β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0. It implies that none of
the independent variables explains the dependent variable. Since the F statistics is
23.31 and p value is 0.0000, which is less than 0.01, so the null hypothesis is
rejected. This indicates that the regression model is statistically significant. The
independent variables (lnNetODA,lnFDI, lnTrade, lnGDP ) have a statistically
significant effect on lnHDI.
3.5 Estimation Technique
3.5.1 Unit Root Test
Prior to estimation of the model, the stationarity of the variables was tested using
the unit root test. This test was designed to check the order of integration of all
the variables and make sure that none of the variables is integrated of the second
order (I(2)).
3.5.2 ARDL Model
The study uses the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model by Pesaran, Shin,
and Smith (2001). The use of the ARDL approach is justified by:
1. The applicability of the method in case the variables are I(0) or I(1) integrated.
2. Its effectiveness for small samples.
3. Estimation of short-run and long-run relationships at once.
4. The lack of any pre-testing biases problems.

The general ARDL model is expressed as:

ΔlnHDIₜ = α₀ + Σα₁ΔlnHDIₜ₋ᵢ + Σα₂ΔlnNetODAₜ₋ᵢ + Σα₃ΔlnFDIₜ₋ᵢ +
Σα₄ΔlnTradeₜ₋ᵢ + Σα₅ΔlnGDPₜ₋ᵢ + λECTₜ₋₁ + μₜ
Where:
 Δ denotes first difference.
 ECT represents the Error Correction Term.
 λ measures the speed of adjustment toward long-run
equilibrium.

3.5.3 ARDL Bounds Test for Cointegration

Cointegration of the variables in the long run was assessed using the ARDL
Bounds Testing approach. Null and alternative hypotheses are as follows:
H₀: There is no long-run relationship.
H₁: There is a long-run relationship.
In case the F-statistic is greater than the upper critical bound value, then there is
cointegration of the variables.
3.6 Diagnostic Tests
A number of diagnostic tests were carried out to check the validity and reliability
of the estimated model.

3.6.1 Breusch-Godfrey Serial Correlation Test

The test is used to detect the serial correlation among the residuals.
H₀: There is no serial correlation.
The Breusch Godfrey LM Test was conducted to examine the presence of serial
correlation in the residuals. The test statistic was χ2 (1)= 0.365 with a p value of
0.5455. Since the p value is greater than 0.05 the null hypothesis of no serial
correlation cannot be rejected. Therefore there is no evidence of autocorrelation
in the residuals.
3.6.2 Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey Heteroscedasticity Test
It helps determine the constant variance of residuals.
H₀: There is homoscedasticity.
The Breusch Pagan Test was conducted to examine the presence of
heteroskedasticity in the residuals. The test produced a χ2 (1) value of 0.03 with a
p value of 0.8625. Since the p value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis of
constant variance cannot be rejected. Therefore, there is no evidence of
heteroskedasticity indicating that the model satisfies the homoskedasticity
assumption.

3.6.3 White Test

The White test was carried out to reveal heteroscedasticity.
White’s test was conducted to examine the presence of heteroskedasticity in the
residuals. The test produced a χ2 (29) value of 30.00 with a p value of 0.414. Since
the p value exceeds 0.05, the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity cannot be
rejected. Therefore, there is no evidence of heteroskedasticity in the model.
Furthermore the Cameron and Trivedi Decomposition of the imtest indicates no
significant problems related to skewness, kurtosis or overall model specification.
3.6.4 Ramsey RESET Test
Ramsey RESET test was used to detect specification error and omitted variable
problem.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): The model is correctly specified.
The Ramsey RESET Test was conducted to examine model specification and
omitted variable bias. The test prodced an F statistics of 4.64 with a p value of
0.0366. Science the p value is less than 0.05. So, the null hypothesis is rejected.
This suggests the presence of specification error and omitted variable in the
model.
3.6.5 Durbin-Watson Test
Durbin-Watson test was utilized to detect first-order autocorrelation among
residuals.

3.6.6 CUSUM Stability Test

The CUSUM test was performed to test the stability of the coefficients estimated.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): No structural instability exists.
Statistics Test Statistics 1% Critical 5% Critical 10% Critical
Value Value Value
recursive 0.3044 1.1430 0.9479 0.850

The recursive CUSUM Test indicates that the estimated ARDL Model is Stable over
the sample period. Since the CUSUM Statistics remains within the 95% confidence
bands throughout the study period, the null hypothesis of parameter stability
cannot be rejected. Therefore there is no evidence of structural instability or
structural break in the model.
3.7 Cointegration Robustness Test
To test the validity of the long-run relationship generated from ARDL model, Fully
Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) was used.
FMOLS helps to deal with the problems of endogeneity and serial correlation
common in the cointegrated system.
3.8 Statistical Software Package Used
All econometric analysis was carried out using Stata statistical package.
Stata software was used to transform the data, calculate descriptive statistics,
perform diagnostic tests, estimate ARDL model, conduct Bounds test, FMOLS
estimation and stability test.

Chapter 5
Results and Discussion
To investigate whether there is any long-run relationship among the variables, the
Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds Testing approach to cointegration
was adopted. The model took the form of Human Development Index (HDI) as the
dependent variable, and Net Official Development Assistance (Net ODA), Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI), Trade Openness, and GDP Growth were used as
independent variables.

4.1 Descriptive Analysis

The descriptive statistics for the variables that will be analyzed in this study are
presented in Table 4.1. The statistics have been produced using the sum function
in Stata. There are a total of 34 annual observations in the data sample spanning
the time frame of 1990-2023.
Table 4.1: Descriptive Statistics of the Variables
Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max

lnHDI 34 -0.6373 0.1694 -0.9289 -0.3783

lnNetODA 34 0.5331 0.4850 -0.0932 1.7137

lnFDI 34 -1.2750 1.7105 -5.4056 0.5512

lnTrade 34 3.4377 0.2536 2.9386 3.8735

lnGDP 34 1.7095 0.2151 1.2378 2.0646

The mean value for the lnHDI variable is -0.6373 with the standard deviation
being 0.1694, meaning there is quite a small dispersion of the values of the
Human Development Index in Bangladesh. The minimum and maximum values of
the variable are -0.9289 and -0.3783 correspondingly, meaning that there have
been gradual improvements in human development over the period considered.
Such dynamics was expected since improvements in education, healthcare and
living standards happen gradually.
The mean value for the lnNetODA variable is 0.5331 while the standard deviation
is 0.4850. The values of the variable range between -0.0932 and 1.7137, meaning
that there were some fluctuations in the amounts of the received official
development assistance during the considered period.
For the lnFDI variable, the mean value is -1.2750 while the standard deviation is
1.7105 and this one is the largest among all explanatory variables. The range of
the values is from -5.4056 to 0.5512 meaning significant variations in the flows of
foreign direct investments during the considered period.
The descriptive statistics of lnTrade reveal a mean of 3.4377 with a standard
deviation of 0.2536. The minimum and maximum values for the variable are
2.9386 and 3.8735, respectively. In comparison with other explanatory variables,
trade openness is a variable with comparatively low variation because the degree
of openness of Bangladesh in international business has been changing gradually
over time.
Lastly, the mean value of lnGDP is 1.7095 with a standard deviation of 0.2151,
while the variable varies within the range of 1.2378 and 2.0646. The low standard
deviation implies that economic growth of Bangladesh was rather stable during
the study period regardless of the fluctuations caused by domestic and
international economic situation.
In general, it can be concluded that the variation of the variables is quite
adequate and no excess dispersion is evident. Therefore, the data can be used for
further econometric analysis to explore the issue under discussion.
Table X shows the findings of the ARDL bounds test. It can be seen that the
computed F-statistics was larger than the upper critical bound at 5 percent
significance level; thus, we reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration. This
implies that there is a stable long-run relationship between HDI, foreign aid, FDI,
trade openness, and economic growth in Bangladesh for the period 1990-2023.
In other words, fluctuations in foreign aid and other macroeconomic variables are
long-run important for human development outcomes in Bangladesh. Therefore,
policies geared towards effective utilization of foreign aid, foreign investments,
international trade, and economic growth can result in positive human
development outcomes in the long run.

5.3 ADF Unit Root Test

Prior to running the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model, it is important
to analyze the stationarity of the variables in the time series. Running a regression
model with non-stationary variables may result in spurious findings (Granger &
Newbold, 1974). Hence, unit root tests will be run to check whether the variables
are stationary in their level or become stationary after being first differenced. It
should be noted that the ARDL bounds test could be applied when the variables
are either I(0) or I(1), yet no variable is I(2).

In this research, two common unit root tests of the time series variables are used:
the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and the Phillips-Perron (PP). ADF test takes
into account serial correlation by adding lagged difference terms to the model,
while the PP test considers serial correlation and heteroscedasticity through the
use of the non-parametric correction.
The results of the ADF and PP unit root tests are presented in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2: Unit root tests

ADF Level P value ADF 1st PP Test 1st Order of

Difference Difference integration
lnHDI -1.125 0.7048 -8.020*** -7.811*** I(1)
lnNetODA -2.576* 0.0981 -6.559*** -6.860*** I(1)
lnFDI -2.146 0.2263 -5.319*** -5.403*** I(1)
lnTrade -2.120 0.2364 -5.268*** -5.250*** I(1)
lnGDP -4.112*** 0.0009 -9.646*** -12.572*** I(0)
***,**,* are used when the p-value is less than 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10, respectively
Source: Calculated by Stata 16 using ‘dfuller’, ‘pperron’ command

It is shown that lnHDI, lnFDI, and lnTrade are not stationary at level using both
ADF and PP tests but they are stationary after first differencing. Thus, the
variables lnHDI, lnFDI, and lnTrade are integrated of order one (I(1)). The variable
lnNetODA is insignificant at the 10 percent significance level in both ADF and PP
tests at level but after considering the conventional significance level of 5 percent
and its clear stationarity at level of first difference, it is taken as I(1). On the other
hand, the variable lnGDP is significant at the level in both ADF and PP tests; thus,
it is stationary without differencing and is considered as an I(0) variable.
In conclusion, from the results of the unit root test, it can be seen that the
variables are a mixture of I(0) and I(1) variables but no variable is I(2). This mixed
order of integration satisfies the basic requirement of the ARDL bounds test
approach. Therefore, the ARDL model is suitable for testing the short and long-
run relationship of foreign aid on socioeconomic development of Bangladesh
from 1990-2023.

Chapter 6:Discussion/ Policy

In terms of implications, the results of this study carry much significance for the
policies of Bangladesh, concerning the proper use of foreign aid to benefit the
outcomes of social development. As social development is evaluated through the
indices like life expectancy, literacy rate, and poverty reduction, the government
should pay more attention to using foreign aid in those areas which have the most
effect on human development.
Thus, first, the Government of Bangladesh needs to concentrate its efforts on the
proper distribution of foreign aid into the sphere of education, healthcare, and
poverty reduction programs.
Secondly, there needs to be more transparency and accountability in the use of
foreign aid. This will involve setting up monitoring and evaluation systems that
will help in ensuring that foreign aid is used effectively and reaches its intended
recipients. Good governance will improve the level of donor confidence and thus
continued funding.
Thirdly, policymakers need to complement foreign aid with good domestic
policies that will make foreign aid more effective. It is likely that foreign aid alone
will not be enough to bring about sustainable social development without being
complemented with good macroeconomic policies, good institutions, and good
public services delivery systems.
Fourthly, there needs to be an effort to attract foreign direct investments (FDI).
FDI can play a very important role in promoting economic development and
creating jobs, which would indirectly help social development goals.
Fifthly, the government should minimize its dependence on foreign aid by
improving domestic resource mobilization. This will involve broadening the tax
base and increasing revenue collection efficiency and developing the private
sector.
Lastly, the planning process of development should stress the inclusion of foreign
aid in the development strategies of the country. The projects being undertaken
through foreign aid should conform to the needs and priorities of the country as
well as the SDGs to enhance its effectiveness and sustainability.
Conclusion
It is true that the success of foreign aid in social development is determined by
the amount of foreign aid received as well as the quality of the institutions and
policies employed in its utilization. Thus, Bangladesh needs to employ a strategy
which encompasses the management of aid, institution building, economic
growth, and human capital development.
Chapter 7: Conclusion
Chapter 8: Limitations of the Study
Although the research has provided valuable insights about the correlation
between foreign aid and socioeconomic development in Bangladesh, there are
several weaknesses in the study.
First, the analysis was conducted using annual time series data over the period of
1990 to 2023. While the data contains information during major economic
development of the country, the small sample size will limit the statistical power
of econometrics models.
Secondly, the study uses HDI as the single proxy for socioeconomic development
in Bangladesh. The use of Human Development Index is appropriate because it
measures different variables which can affect socioeconomic development of the
country but HDI cannot measure all aspects of socioeconomic development like
poverty alleviation, income distribution, employment creation, social security,
quality of institutions and sustainability.
Thirdly, there are only four independent variables included in the model that
include net ODA received by the country, GDP growth, FDI, and trade openness.
There are other factors which may influence socioeconomic development of the
country but are not included in the regression model due to data constraints.
Fourth, this paper is restricted to the case of Bangladesh only. This means that the
results obtained from the study are country-specific and thus may not be
generalized to other developing nations with varying economic structure,
institutions, and foreign aid management system.
Fifth, while the ARDL and FMOLS techniques are applicable in investigating the
relationship between variables with mixed order of integration in the long run,
these techniques are unable to take into consideration some of the problems
such as structural breaks, measurement errors, missing variables, or even the
endogeneity problem that exists between foreign aid and socioeconomic
development.
Lastly, the paper utilizes secondary data available from internationally recognized
sources. Inconsistencies or revisions in the databases may affect the empirical
findings in the study. However, using internationally recognized data increases
the reliability of the analysis.
In spite of the weaknesses described above, this paper contributes significantly to
knowledge by presenting empirical findings regarding the effectiveness of foreign
aid in achieving socioeconomic development in Bangladesh. Future studies can
use a larger dataset, introduce more socioeconomic and institutional variables,
investigate sectoral foreign aid, or even use another econometric technique.

Chapter 9: References
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill
Education.
United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Human Development Report
2025. United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2025). World Development Indicators. World Bank.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD
Development Assistance Committee (DAC) statistics. OECD Publishing.