0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views6 pages

3rd Year Week 3 Module

Uploaded by

rajgahoi01
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views6 pages

3rd Year Week 3 Module

Uploaded by

rajgahoi01
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Week 3 Module:

Date: 29/06/2026

Question 1 (Easy):

A university's Training and Placement Cell have successfully completed its annual placement drive.
The placement department has collected the salary packages (in LPA) offered to students by different
companies. However, the records were entered in the order they were received, resulting in an
unsorted list of package values.

Before publishing the placement statistics report, the department wants all package values arranged
in ascending order. Since the university plans to handle placement data for thousands of students in
the coming years, they want a sorting technique that is efficient for large datasets.

Your task is to implement the Merge Sort algorithm to sort the package values in increasing order.
Merge Sort follows a divide-and-conquer approach by dividing the dataset into smaller subarrays,
sorting them recursively, and then merging them back together.

The final sorted list will help the university identify minimum, median, and maximum packages while
generating analytical reports.

Input

• First line contains an integer N, representing the number of placed students.

• Second line contains N space-separated integers, representing package values (multiplied by


100 to avoid decimals).

Output

Print the package values in ascending order.

Constraints

• 1 ≤ N ≤ 100000

• 100 ≤ Package ≤ 10000

Example

Input:

6
450 1200 800 650 300 1500

Output:

300 450 650 800 1200 1500


Question 2 (Medium):

A large e-commerce company tracks the time taken (in minutes) to process customer orders before
shipment. Due to varying warehouse workloads, processing times differ significantly from one order
to another.

The analytics team wants to study operational efficiency by sorting all processing times and
generating statistical information. Since millions of orders are processed every month, the company
requires an efficient sorting technique with predictable performance.

Your task is to use Merge Sort to arrange all processing times in ascending order.
After sorting, perform the following operations:
1. Display the sorted processing times.
2. Find the median processing time.
3. Count the number of orders whose processing time is greater than the median.
4. Display the difference between the fastest and slowest processing time.

The solution should efficiently handle large datasets and demonstrate a clear understanding of
Merge Sort's divide-and-conquer strategy.

Input

• First line contains integer N.

• Second line contains N space-separated processing times.

Output

• Sorted processing times.

• Median processing time.

• Count of orders greater than median.

• Difference between maximum and minimum processing time.

Constraints

• 1 ≤ N ≤ 100000

• 1 ≤ Time ≤ 100000

Example

Input:

7
12 25 18 30 15 22 40

Output:

12 15 18 22 25 30 40
Median: 22
Orders Above Median: 3
Difference: 28
Topic 2: Quick Sort

Question 1 (Easy):

A cloud infrastructure company manages hundreds of servers distributed across different


geographical locations. Every hour, each server reports its average response time in milliseconds. The
collected data is stored in the order it arrives and is not sorted.

To generate performance reports, the operations team wants the response times arranged from the
fastest server to the slowest server. Since the data size can become very large, an efficient in-place
sorting technique is required.

Your task is to implement Quick Sort to sort the response times in ascending order. Built-in sorting
methods are not allowed.

After sorting, the operations team will use the report to identify high-latency servers and optimize
system performance.

Input

• First line contains integer N.

• Second line contains N space-separated response times.

Output

Print the response times in ascending order.

Constraints

• 1 ≤ N ≤ 100000

• 1 ≤ Response Time ≤ 10000

Example

Input:

6
120 45 78 200 60 95

Output:

45 60 78 95 120 200
Question 2 (Medium):

A financial analytics company receives daily trade-value data from multiple stock exchanges. Analysts
use this information to identify high-value trading activity and market trends.

The trade values are received in random order throughout the day. Before analysis can begin, the
data must be sorted in descending order.

Your task is to implement Quick Sort to arrange the trade values from highest to lowest.

After sorting, perform the following operations:


1. Display the sorted trade values.
2. Find the Top 5 highest trade values.
3. Calculate the average of the Top 5 values.
4. Count how many trade values are greater than the overall average of all trade values.
This problem evaluates your understanding of partitioning, recursion, and real-world data analysis
using Quick Sort.

Input

• First line contains integer N.

• Second line contains N space-separated trade values.

Output

• Sorted trade values (descending).

• Top 5 values.

• Average of Top 5 values.

• Count of values greater than overall average.

Constraints

• 5 ≤ N ≤ 100000

• 1 ≤ Trade Value ≤ 10^9

Example

Input:

8
500 1200 700 2000 900 1500 3000 2500

Output:

3000 2500 2000 1500 1200 900 700 500


Top 5: 3000 2500 2000 1500 1200
Average of Top 5: 2040
Values Above Overall Average: 4
Topic 3: Heap Sort

Question 1 (Easy):

An online gaming platform is hosting a national-level tournament involving thousands of participants.


At the end of the tournament, player scores are collected from multiple game servers and stored in
random order.

Before announcing the final rankings, the organizers need all scores sorted in ascending order. Since
the leaderboard data can be very large, they have decided to use Heap Sort, which provides
guaranteed O(N log N) performance.

Your task is to implement Heap Sort and arrange all player scores in increasing order.

The sorted output will help tournament officials generate rankings and determine qualification
thresholds for future events.

Input

• First line contains integer N.

• Second line contains N space-separated player scores.

Output

Print the scores in ascending order.

Constraints

• 1 ≤ N ≤ 100000

• 0 ≤ Score ≤ 1000000

Example

Input:

6
850 1200 950 600 1500 1000

Output:

600 850 950 1000 1200 1500


Question 2 (Medium):

A multi-specialty hospital maintains records of emergency response times for all critical cases
handled during a month. Each response time represents the number of minutes taken by the
emergency team to reach and begin treatment for a patient.

Hospital administrators want to analyze the efficiency of their emergency services. To do so, all
response times must first be sorted using Heap Sort.

After sorting the response times in ascending order, generate the following statistics:
1. Display the sorted response times.
2. Find the fastest response time.
3. Find the slowest response time.
4. Calculate the average response time.
5. Count the number of cases handled faster than the average.
6. Calculate the percentage of cases handled faster than the average.
The hospital intends to use this information to improve resource allocation and reduce emergency
response delays.

Input

• First line contains integer N.


• Second line contains N space-separated response times.
Output

• Sorted response times.


• Fastest response time.
• Slowest response time.
• Average response time.
• Number of cases faster than average.
• Percentage of cases faster than average.
Constraints

• 1 ≤ N ≤ 100000
• 1 ≤ Time ≤ 500
Example

Input:

8
12 7 15 9 20 5 10 8

Output:

5 7 8 9 10 12 15 20
Fastest: 5
Slowest: 20
Average: 10.75
Cases Faster Than Average: 5
Percentage: 62.50%

You might also like