Module 1
Module 1
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed to develop the students’ communicative competence and enhance their
understanding of the principles and practices of communication in various context. This course
covers communication theories, effective writing, speaking and presentation skills, and the role
of communication in a globalized society.
LESSONS:
Learning Outcomes:
“Communication - the human connection - is the key to personal and career success.” (Paul J.
Meyer)
Communication is the exchange of meanings between individuals through common system
of symbols (Britannica, 2023). However, the study of communication has intrigued scholars from
ancient Greece to modern times, as it often intersects with other disciplines and is frequently
perceived as a fundamental and inherent process. In 1928, I.A. Richards, an English literary critic
and author, offered one of the first and best definitions of communication as an independent
aspect of human enterprise. Richards expounded that communication happens when one mind
acts upon its environment and influences another mind. In the other mind, an experience
happens, like the experience in the first mind, and is caused partly by that experience. Richards's
definition is both general and rough but its application to nearly all kinds of communication
including those between humans and animals separated the contents of messages from the
process in human affairs by which this message is transmitted.
Metts (2004), on the other hand, argued that communication is based on a process in which
messages, whether intentional or unintentional, create meaning. However, communication can
also be constrained based on the mechanism adopted. For example, in a country where
totalitarian and dictatorship regimes, freedoms of speech and expression are restrained.
Hence, effective communication can breach peace, spark revolutions, and affect change in
government. However, to communicate properly, one cannot simple strive to express oneself
and leave understanding to fate; one must also learn how to organize one’s thoughts, control
one’s emotions, use one’s word to articulate concepts and arguments, and express oneself in the
best way possible (Uychoco & Santos, 2019).
ELEMENTS OF COMMUNICATION
The sender is the individual who encodes and transmits a message to a receiver through a
specific channel. As the initiator of communication, the sender plays a crucial role in the process.
For example, a manager who sends an email to employees regarding a new company policy is
acting as the sender since they are the one starting the communication.
The message refers to the specific meaning, content, or information that the sender wishes
to convey and for the receiver to understand. Messages can be intentional or unintentional,
written or spoken, and may include both verbal and non-verbal elements. For instance, when you
see a friend walking towards you on campus and you make eye contact, wave, smile, and say
"hello," you are delivering an intentional message that is both spoken and non-verbal.
The channel is the method or means of communication that the sender uses to send a
message to the receiver. The most common channels used in human communication are verbal
and non-verbal. Verbal communication relies on language and includes speaking, writing, and
sign language. In contrast, non-verbal communication encompasses gestures, facial expressions,
paralanguage, and touch. Additionally, individuals utilize mediated channels, such as television,
cellphones, radios, and computers, which can combine both verbal and non-verbal
communication. For example, a customer service representative assisting a client over the phone
is using a mediated channel (the phone) that relies on verbal communication.
The receiver is the individual who receives the message. They are the target audience
responsible for interpreting the message. The receiver must also decode the message in a way
that is meaningful to them. For instance, when you see your friend make eye contact, smile,
wave, or say "hello" as you pass by, you are receiving a message intended for you. In this scenario,
the receiver must decode both the verbal and non-verbal communication in a manner that
resonates with them.
Feedback is the response from the receiver, which helps the sender assess understanding
and adjust the message if necessary. An example of feedback is a student asking a follow-up
question after a lecture.
Noise refers to anything that disrupts the sending or receiving of a message. Noise can be
external (such as the sounds of buses, loud music, or construction jackhammers) or internal (such
as physical pain, psychological stress, or nervousness). Noise can complicate the encoding and
decoding of messages, making communication less effective.
He emphasizes the need for speakers to consider factors such as the audience's values,
beliefs, and emotions, as well as the situational dynamics at play, to achieve a desired impact. By
adapting their rhetoric and choice of topics accordingly, speakers can enhance their
persuasiveness and foster a deeper connection with their listeners. Thus, Aristotle’s model
remains relevant in understanding the complexities of effective communication in various
settings.
Imagine a political candidate named Alex delivering a speech to a crowd at a campaign rally.
Alex is responsible for crafting a persuasive and effective message focused on key campaign
promises, such as improving healthcare, boosting the economy, and ensuring public safety. The
goal of the speech is to influence and persuade the audience.
The attendees at the rally, who are potential voters, listen to the speech and react based
on their beliefs and perspectives. The rally takes place in a public square just a week before the
election, when emotions are high and people are eager to hear solutions to pressing issues. The
setting and timing play a significant role in how the message is received.
If Alex delivers the speech convincingly, using logical arguments (logos), emotional appeals
(pathos), and demonstrating credibility (ethos), the audience may be swayed to support and vote
for them.
The Shannon – Weaver model was created by Claude Shannon and Warren Weaver (Flores,
2016). Shannon was a research scientist at Bell Telephone Company. In his efforts to enhance
communication over telephone lines, he focused on minimizing distortion. Meanwhile, Warren
Weaver adapted Shannon’s concepts for telecommunications to interpersonal communication,
leading to the creation of one of the most popular communication models. This model is aptly
named the Shannon-Weaver Model.
According to Flores (2016; Uychoco & Santos, 2019), this is also often called the “Telephone
Model”, since it was developed because of the technology of the telephone and the experience
of "noise” coming from the switchboard.
As the Shannon – Weaver model suggests, a message begins at the source and transmitted
using a signal towards a receiver. The message travels from the sender to the receiver while
encountering all kinds of noise (sources of interference). Lastly, the receiver of the message will
let the source know if the message is understood, which is referred to as feedback, and is a repeat
of the communication process but for the receiver back to the sender.
• Sender is the source of the message. The sender has some information or content
material they want someone else to know. According to Marteney (n.d.), it is
generally acknowledged that the sender of the message has the primary
responsibility for the success or failure of the communication act because the
sender controls the variable of the communicative act compared to the receiver of
the message.
• Encoder is the transmitter which converts the message into signals, and encoding
is the process by which the source takes an idea or though and selects verbal and
non-verbal symbols from their environment to send which accurately represents
the idea or thought.
• Message is the content of the communication. This is what the sender wants their
audience to know.
• Channel is the medium through which the message must pass.
• Decoder is the reception place which converts signals into message. A reverse
process of encode. Decoding is the ability to translate the message code into
symbols that the receiver can understand. The object is for the receiver to interpret
the message as the sender encoded it.
• Receiver is the target audience of the message. There may be a chosen or primary
audience for whom the message is intended, and a secondary audience, of all other
who gain access to the communication. While receivers, do not start the
communication process, they have accountability for their communication
behaviors with respect to listening and providing accurate feedback.
• Noise is anything that disrupts or distorts the communication process.
• Feedback is information that is sent back to the source.
For example, Emma, a project manager, needs to send an important email to her team
about an upcoming deadline. She types the email using her laptop, structuring the message
clearly so that it is understandable. The email is sent through the company’s email server and
delivered to the team member’s inboxes.
However, possible distractions or obstacles may affect the message, such as technical
issues (email server delay, spam filter), misinterpretation (unclear subject line, vague wording),
or external distractions (team members busy with other tasks).
On the other hand, each member opens the email and reads it, interpreting its meaning
based on their understanding. The team member processes the message and take action –
marking the deadline in their calendars and adjusting their tasks accordingly. Yet, one team
member replies, asking for clarification about a specific task. Then Emma responds with
additional details ensuring effective communication.
With the given scenario, it illustrates how Shannon – Weaver’s model applies in a modern
work environment, highlighting how noise can interfere and how feedback helps ensure clarity.
When it comes to Schramm’s model of communication, there are two primary models
involved. The first one is built on the theories of Osgood, which is why this is also known as
Osgood – Schramm model.
Illustration by [Link]
Schramm also believed that messages are transmitted through a medium, allowing the
decoder to provide feedback to indicate that the message has been received. He asserted that
communication is incomplete without feedback from the receiver. Consequently, encoding and
decoding are essential for effective communication; any exchange lacking these processes or
feedback is neither effective nor complete.
The Osgood-Schramm Model of communication illustrates that messages can flow in two
directions. When a person decodes a message, they can then encode a response and send it back
to the original sender. This interaction can continue in a cyclical manner. This revised model
indicates that:
Thus, this model illustrated that feedback is cyclical and communication is complex because
it accounts for interpretation. Moreover, it showcases the fact that we are active communicators,
and we are active in interpreting the messages that we receive.
The last model is Eugene White’s Stages of Oral Communication which is a comprehensive
framework that explains the complexities inherent in the communication process. Unlike
traditional models that primarily focus on the sender, message, channel, receiver, and feedback.
White’s model expands the scope to include socio-cultural factors, power dynamics, and the role
of technology in shaping communication dynamics.
According to White, it is possible to begin at any stage of his communication model. Many
people mistakenly believe that communication starts with thought, but this is not necessarily
true. Since the model is circular, it suggests that oral communication is a continuous process with
no definitive beginning or end. According to Flores (2016), one of White's most significant
contributions is the concept of feedback, which can only be effectively processed by the speaker
if they are attentive to the audience or listener. Therefore, the speaker must also observe the
listener’s verbal and non-verbal cues.
Symbolizing
Thinking Expressing
Monitoring Transmitting
Feedbacking Receiving
Decoding
Apart from that, White acknowledges the inherent power dynamics that permeate
communication interactions in which power can manifest in various forms, including social
status, institutional authority, and access to resources. Therefore, these power differentials
influence how messages are transmitted, received, and interpreted. White also highlights the
importance of critically examining power dynamics to understand who holds the influence in
communication exchanges and how it shapes communication outcomes.
White also recognizes the significant impact of technology on communication patterns and
dynamics. Thus, the model explores how different communication channels, such as social
media, email, and video conferencing can shape the transmission and reception of messages and
their implications for interpersonal relationships and societal discourse.
Lastly, he emphasizes that communication is an iterative process marked by continuous
feedback and adaptation. Feedback is crucial for refining messages, clarifying intentions, and
resolving misunderstandings. Moreover, the model demonstrates that effective communication
involves a dynamic cycle of receiving and responding to feedback, allowing individuals to adjust
their messages and approaches based on the context and the audience's reactions
([Link]).
In conclusion, communication is more than just a simple exchange between speaker and
listener; many factors affect it. First, think about how the message is structured and the context
it comes from. When you send a message, it’s important to include feedback to improve
understanding. Different kinds of noise can interrupt the message, so it's important to recognize
or avoid them. You should also consider cultural differences, technology, and how people
interpret your words. To communicate well, pay attention to how others react to your message
and be ready to adjust your approach, instead of just focusing on sharing your own thoughts
(Uychoco & Santos, 2019).
Lesson Activity # 1:
This activity is designed to help you become aware of your communication habits and to
encourage you to take steps to improve them. Effective communication is valuable skill that will
benefit you in all aspects of your life.
Verbal Communication 1 2 3 4
I speak clearly and at an appropriate volume.
I use appropriate language for the audience I am addressing.
I organize my thoughts before speaking.
I stay on topic during conversations or presentations
I can explain complex ideas in a simple and understandable way.
I ask clarifying questions when I don’t understand something.
I give relevant and constructive feedback to others.
Non – Verbal Communication 1 2 3 4
I maintain appropriate eye contact when speaking or listening.
I use facial expressions and body language that match my messages.
I am aware of my body language and how it might be perceived by others.
I use appropriate gestures to emphasize my points.
I am aware of my tone of voice and how it impacts my message.
Listening Skills 1 2 3 4
I actively listen to others without interrupting.
I pay attention to both verbal and non-verbal cues from the speaker.
I summarize or paraphrase what the speaker has said to ensure
understanding.
I avoid distractions when someone I speaking to me.
I show empathy and understanding when listening to others.
I avoid jumping to conclusions or making assumptions before the speaker is
finished.
Listening Skills 1 2 3 4
My written communication is clear and concise.
I use proper grammar and spelling in my written work.
I tailor my writing style to the intended audience.
I can effectively communicate through emails and messages.
I proofread my written work before submitting.
Interpersonal Communication 1 2 3 4
I am comfortable communicating with people from diverse backgrounds.
I can effectively work in a team and communicate with team members.
I can handle disagreements and conflicts in a respectful manner.
I am open to receiving feedback and suggestions from others.
I am able to adapt my communication style to different situations.
Reflection:
After completing the questionnaire, take some time to reflect on your responses:
References:
Admin, & Admin. (2014, July 10). OSGOOD- SCHRAMM MODEL OF COMMUNICATION.
Communication Theory. [Link]
communication/
Admin, & Admin. (2014b, July 10). Shannon and Weaver model of communication.
Communication Theory. [Link]
of-communication/
Libretexts. (2021, August 6). 2.4: Models of interpersonal communication. Social Sci LibreTexts.
[Link]
cation_-
_A_Mindful_Approach_to_Relationships_(Wrench_et_al.)/02%3A_Overview_of_Interperso
nal_Communication/2.04%3A_Models_of_Interpersonal_Communication
Uychoco, M.T., & Santos, M.L. (2018). Communication for Society: Purposive Communication.
Manila City: Rex Book Store, Inc.