Survey Questionnaire
Source of Instrument:
The survey questionnaire used in this study was adopted from:
Alciera, M. V., Lovendino, G., Jardin, M. J., Lofamia, J. P., Molleno, C., & Macasinag, G. (n.d.). An
evaluation of the implementation of TUPAD in Barangay Marifosque, Pilar, Sorsogon.
The researchers acknowledge the source of the adopted instrument. Since the questionnaire was adopted and
not researcher-made, the source is disclosed for ethical clearance documentation.
Data Privacy Notice and Informed Consent
Dear Respondent,
You are invited to participate in the study entitled Assessing Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity of the
TUPAD Program for Enhancement: Perspectives of Beneficiaries in Barangay 649, City of Manila. This study
is conducted by Bachelor of Public Administration students of the Polytechnic University of the Philippines -
Open University System for academic research purposes.
In compliance with Republic Act No. 10173, or the Data Privacy Act of 2012, the researchers assure you that
any personal information and responses collected through this questionnaire will be treated with strict
confidentiality. The data collected may include demographic information such as age, sex, civil status,
employment status, monthly income, length of residency, and your responses regarding the TUPAD Program.
These data will be used only for this research and will be presented in summarized or aggregated form. Your
name will not appear in the report, and no information that can directly identify you will be disclosed.
Your participation is voluntary. You may choose not to answer any question or withdraw from the survey at
any time without penalty or negative consequence. Only the researchers and authorized academic personnel
will have access to the collected data. The data will be stored securely and disposed of properly after the
required academic retention period.
By answering this questionnaire, you confirm that you have read and understood the purpose of the study,
your rights as a respondent, and how your data will be protected. You voluntarily agree to participate in this
research.
Consent:
[ ] I agree to participate in this study and allow the researchers to use my responses for academic research
purposes, subject to confidentiality and data privacy protections.
[ ] I do not agree to participate in this study.
TUPAD SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
I. Profile of Respondents
Before answering, please check one:
☐ I am aware of the TUPAD Program
☐ I am not aware of the TUPAD Program
Please check (✔) or fill in the appropriate box:
● Age:
● Sex: ☐ Male / Lalaki ☐ Female / Babae
● Civil Status: ☐ Single ☐ Married ☐ Widowed ☐ Separated / Hiwalay
● Employment Status: ☐ Employed ☐ Underemployed ☐ Unemployed ☐ Displaced Worker ☐
Self-employed / Informal Worker
● Monthly Family Income: ☐ Below ₱10,000 ☐ ₱10,001–₱20,000 ☐ ₱20,001–₱30,000 ☐
Above
● Length of Residency in Barangay 649 City of Manila: years
II. Assessment of the TUPAD Program
This part focuses on the assessment of the TUPAD Program. Please use the rating scale below to assess
the statements on efficiency, effectiveness and equity.
Rating Scale:
5 – Strongly Agree | 4 – Agree | 3 – Moderately Agree | 2 – Disagree | 1 – Strongly Disagree
After completing the assessment, please proceed to the section on Challenges in the Implementation of
the TUPAD Program at the end of this questionnaire.
A. EFFICIENCY
5 4 3 2 1
1. The TUPAD program was implemented in a timely manner.
(Ang programang TUPAD ay naipatupad sa tamang oras.)
2. The wage payment process was fast and organized.
(Ang proseso ng pagbabayad ng sahod ay mabilis at maayos.)
3. The program made good use of available resources.
(Ang programa ay mahusay na gumamit ng mga magagamit na yaman.)
[Link] tasks assigned to beneficiaries were clearly planned and executed.
(Ang mga gawaing ibinigay sa mga benepisyaryo ay malinaw na pinlano at naisakatuparan.)
[Link] barangay and DOLE coordinators efficiently managed the program.
(Ang mga tagapag-ugnay ng barangay at DOLE ay mahusay mga namahala ng programa.)
B. EFFECTIVENESS
1. The TUPAD program met its goal of providing temporary employment.
(Naabot ng programang TUPAD ang layunin nitong magbigay ng pansamantalang trabaho.)
2. My participation in TUPAD helped me earn enough to support my family temporarily.
(Ang aking paglahok sa TUPAD ay nakatulong upang pansamantalang matustusan ang aking
pamilya.)
3. The work experience gained from TUPAD improved my skills or employability.
(Ang karanasang nakuha ko sa TUPAD ay nagpaunlad ng aking kakayahan at oportunidad
sa trabaho.)
4. The program contributed positively to the community.
(Nagkaroon ng positibong ambag sa komunidad ang programa.)
5. I am satisfied with the overall results of the TUPAD program.
(Ako ay nasiyahan sa kabuuang resulta ng programang TUPAD.)
C. EQUITY
1. The selection of TUPAD beneficiaries was fair and transparent.
(Ang pagpili ng mga benepisyaryo ng TUPAD ay makatarungan at malinaw.)
2. All qualified individuals had equal opportunities to participate in the program.
(Ang lahat ng kwalipikadong indibidwal ay nagkaroon ng pantay na pagkakataon na
makilahok sa programa.)
3. There was no favoritism or bias in selecting participants.
(Walang paboritismo o pagkiling sa pagpili ng mga kalahok.)
4. The program was inclusive of all sectors (e.g., men, women, elderly, PWDs).
(Ang programa ay nakasama ang lahat ng sektor (hal. kalalakihan, kababaihan, matatanda,
PWDs)
5. I felt that my rights as a beneficiary were respected during the implementation.
(Nararamdaman kong iginalang ang aking mga karapatan bilang benepisyaryo sa panahon
ng pagpapatupad ng programa.)
1. Efficiency:
How would you describe the efficiency of the TUPAD Program? Please give an example.
(Paano mo ilalarawan ang pagiging episyente ng Programang TUPAD? Magbigay ng halimbawa.)
2. Effectiveness:
How effective is the TUPAD Program in helping its beneficiaries? Explain briefly.
(Gaano kaepektibo ang Programang TUPAD sa pagtulong sa mga benepisyaryo? Ipaliwanag nang maikli.)
3. Equity:
Does the TUPAD Program provide fair and equal access to beneficiaries? Why or why not?
(Nagbibigay ba ang Programang TUPAD ng patas at pantay na oportunidad sa mga benepisyaryo? Bakit oo o hindi?)
III. CHALLENGES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TUPAD PROGRAM
Please check all that apply to your experience with the TUPAD program:
Pakisagutan ang lahat ng naaangkop batay sa inyong karanasan sa programang TUPAD:
☐ Delays in wage or cash assistance distribution
(Pagkaantala sa pamamahagi ng sahod o tulong-pinansyal)
☐ Lack of clear orientation or guidelines
(Kakulangan ng malinaw na oryentasyon o mga alituntunin)
☐ Limited manpower or slow processing by coordinators
(Kakulangan ng tauhan o mabagal na proseso ng mga tagapag-ugnay)
☐ Poor communication or lack of updates from barangay or DOLE
(Kakulangan ng komunikasyon o impormasyon mula sa barangay o DOLE)
☐ Unfair selection or favoritism in choosing beneficiaries
(Hindi patas na pagpili o paboritismo sa pagpili ng mga benepisyaryo)
☐ Inadequate tools, materials, or safety equipment during work
(Kakulangan ng kagamitan o gamit pangkaligtasan habang nagtatrabaho)
☐ Lack of transparency in program procedures
(Kakulangan ng pagiging bukas o malinaw sa mga proseso ng programa)
☐ Limited accessibility or support for senior citizens or PWDs
(Kkulangan ng akses o tulong para sa mga nakatatanda o PWDs
Others (please specify):
(Iba pa, pakitukoy): .
Thank you!