Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Disaster Risk Management

Final Term Course

Compiled Notes & Case Studies

1
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 1: Impacts of Natural Disasters — Case Studies

Natural disasters produce wide-ranging impacts on human life, the economy, infrastructure, the
environment, and long-term development. The two case studies below — the 2010 Pakistan
Floods and the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake — illustrate how a single hazard event can affect an
entire country across multiple dimensions: economic, human, environmental, social, health, and
psychological.
Studying these two events side by side is useful because they represent two very different
hazard types — a slow-onset hydrological disaster and a sudden-onset geological disaster —
yet both produced strikingly similar patterns of damage: widespread displacement, collapse of
essential services, long recovery timelines, and exposure of weak engineering and institutional
preparedness. Examining both cases together helps identify common lessons that apply across
disaster types, not just to a single hazard.

Case Study 1: Pakistan 2010 Floods (Nowshera & Nationwide)

Introduction
Natural disasters produce wide-ranging impacts on human life, the economy, infrastructure, the
environment, and long-term development. The 2010 floods in Pakistan are one of the most
devastating examples, showing how a single hazard can affect an entire country. Nowshera
(KPK) became one of the most severely impacted districts due to its geographical location near
major rivers, particularly the Kabul River, which overflowed and submerged large parts of the
city and surrounding settlements.

Key Impacts
Economic Impact
• Loss of agriculture, livestock, and businesses.
• Disruption of livelihoods.
Case Study: Nationwide economic loss ran into billions of dollars; crops like wheat, rice, and
cotton were destroyed; around 20 million people were affected, sharply reducing national
productivity.
Human Impact
• Natural disasters cause deaths and injuries.
• They lead to homelessness and displacement.
Case Study: Thousands of deaths occurred across Pakistan. In Nowshera, whole communities
were forced to evacuate as floodwater submerged houses.
Environmental Impact
• Soil erosion and land degradation.
• Damage to ecosystems.
• Water logging and salinity.
Case Study: Water contamination affected rivers and groundwater, and agricultural productivity
was significantly reduced as a result.
Social Impacts

2
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

• Disruption of community life.

• Breakdown of the social system.
Case Study: Schools remained closed for long periods, and many families were separated
during evacuation and resettlement.
Health Impacts
• Spread of diseases.
• Poor sanitation and lack of clean water.
Case Study: Diseases such as malaria and cholera increased, while medical facilities faced
severe shortages.
Psychological Impacts
• Mental stress and trauma.
Case Study: The loss of homes and loved ones caused long-term emotional effects on
survivors, many of whom continued to experience anxiety and trauma well after the flood waters
receded.

Engineering Insights
Beyond the human and economic toll, the 2010 floods exposed serious weaknesses in
infrastructure planning and design. The lessons below are drawn directly from how the disaster
unfolded.
Poor Drainage System
Insight: Urban and rural drainage systems were either blocked or under-designed to handle the
volume of water produced by the floods.
• Engineering Lesson: Design efficient stormwater drainage systems.
• Engineering Lesson: Separate stormwater and sewage systems so that flooding does
not overwhelm sanitation infrastructure.
Lack of Resilient Infrastructure
Insight: Many buildings and roads were not designed to withstand extreme events such as
prolonged, high-volume flooding.
• Engineering Lesson: Use reinforced and flood-resistant materials.
• Engineering Lesson: Adopt disaster-resilient design standards and materials in
construction.
Failure of Bridges and Culverts
Insight: Many bridges collapsed due to scouring (erosion around foundations) and high flow
velocity.
• Engineering Lesson: Design for scour depth and high-velocity flow.
• Engineering Lesson: Use deep foundations, such as piles, to anchor structures against
erosion.

3
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Case Study 2: 2005 Kashmir Earthquake

Introduction
Earthquakes are among the most destructive natural disasters, caused by the sudden release of
energy in the earth's crust. They occur without warning and can cause severe loss of life and
infrastructure collapse within seconds. The 2005 Kashmir earthquake is a major example,
especially affecting northern Pakistan, including Balakot, Muzaffarabad, and the surrounding
areas.

Magnitude 7.6 (Richter Scale)

Date 8 October 2005
Deaths 80,000+ people
Injured 100,000+ people
Homeless Millions of people

Key Impacts
Economic Impacts
The earthquake resulted in the loss of property and economic activity across the affected
region.
Case Study: Damages amounted to billions of dollars, and businesses across the affected
districts were forced to shut down.
Human Impacts
The sudden collapse of buildings was the leading cause of death and injury.
• Deaths
• Serious injuries
Case Study: Tens of thousands of people died instantly when buildings collapsed without
warning.
Environmental Impact
The earthquake triggered landslides and ground deformation across mountainous terrain.
Case Study: Massive landslides occurred in mountain areas, and large forest areas were
damaged as a result of slope failures.
Social Impacts
The disaster disrupted community life and institutions across the affected region.
Case Study: Families were separated during the chaos, and entire communities were
destroyed, with social structures taking years to rebuild.

Comparing the Two Case Studies

Although the 2010 floods and the 2005 earthquake were caused by entirely different natural
processes, comparing them side by side highlights recurring patterns in how disasters unfold
and the kinds of failures that tend to repeat across hazard types.

4
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Aspect 2010 Pakistan Floods vs. 2005 Kashmir Earthquake

Hazard type Hydro-meteorological (slow-onset flooding) vs. Geological (sudden-
onset seismic event)
Onset Gradual, allowing some warning time vs. Instantaneous, with no
warning
Worst-affected area Nowshera (KPK) and nationwide riverine areas vs. Balakot,
Muzaffarabad, and surrounding northern districts
Primary cause of Drowning, displacement, and disease vs. Building collapse
casualties
Shared lessons Both exposed weak infrastructure, poor early warning systems, and
the need for resilient design and stronger institutional coordination

Together, these two case studies show that disaster impact is rarely limited to the immediate
hazard itself; it cascades into the economy, public health, social fabric, and mental wellbeing of
affected populations, and the recovery period can extend for years after the initial event.

5
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 2: Concept of Disaster Planning and Management

Introduction
Disaster planning and management is a systematic and organized approach to dealing with
disasters effectively. It includes planning, coordination, and implementation of measures to
reduce disaster risks and manage their impacts before, during, and after a hazardous event
occurs.

Concept of Disaster Planning

Disaster planning is the process of developing strategies and action plans to prepare for and
respond to disasters. It is built around five key features that together ensure a community or
organization is ready to face a hazard.

Key Features
• (i) Risk Assessment — the foundation of any disaster plan, since risks cannot be
managed until they are first understood.
◦ Identify hazards, vulnerable areas, and populations.
◦ Analyze possible impacts.
• (ii) Preparedness Planning — translates risk knowledge into concrete, actionable
readiness measures.
◦ Develop emergency plans.
◦ Arrange resources (food, shelter).
• (iii) Early Warning Systems — buy critical time for people to move to safety before a
hazard strikes.
◦ Provide timely alerts to people.
◦ Use technology for forecasting.
• (iv) Resource Allocation — ensures that personnel, equipment, and funding are
positioned where they will be needed most.
◦ Proper management of manpower, equipment, and funds.
• (v) Training and Awareness — builds the human capacity to act correctly and calmly
when a real disaster occurs.
◦ Conduct drills and awareness programs.
Together, these five features form a continuous cycle: risks are assessed, plans and resources
are prepared accordingly, warning systems are kept ready, resources are pre-positioned, and
people are trained — so that when a hazard does occur, the response is swift and organized
rather than chaotic.

Concept of Disaster Management

Disaster management is the process of organizing and managing resources and responsibilities
to deal with disasters effectively. It is generally understood through four interconnected phases,
often referred to as the disaster management cycle.

6
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

While disaster planning is primarily about designing strategies and action plans in advance,
disaster management is the broader, ongoing process of actually organizing people, resources,
and responsibilities to carry those plans out — before, during, and after a disaster. In practice,
planning feeds directly into management: a well-researched plan is only as useful as the system
that implements it when a real emergency occurs.

Phases (Cycle)
• (1) Mitigation (Prevention): Reduce disaster risks before occurrence.
Example: Building dams and earthquake-resistant structures.
• (2) Preparedness: Planning and readiness.
Example: Warning systems and community readiness programs.
• (3) Response: Immediate actions during disasters.
◦ Rescue operations, medical aid.
• (4) Recovery:
◦ Rehabilitation and reconstruction.
◦ Restoring normal life.

Objectives of Disaster Planning and Management

These objectives guide every decision made across the disaster management cycle, from the
initial risk assessment to the final stages of reconstruction:
• Save human lives.
• Reduce economic losses.
• Protect infrastructure.
• Ensure quick recovery.

Importance
A well-functioning disaster planning and management system delivers benefits that extend well
beyond the immediate emergency response:
• Minimize damage and losses.
• Improve coordination among agencies.
• Enhance preparedness and response.

7
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 3: Types of Plans in Disaster Management

Disaster management uses different plans to reduce risks, prepare communities, respond
effectively, and recover after a disaster. Each plan has a specific purpose within the overall
disaster management cycle, and together they form a complete framework for handling a
hazard from start to finish.
Broadly, the Mitigation and Preparedness Plans operate before a disaster strikes, the Response
Plan operates during the emergency itself, and the Recovery and Reconstruction Plans take
over afterward, while the Contingency and Evacuation Plans cut across these stages to address
specific, scenario-based needs. Understanding how each plan fits into this larger sequence
makes it easier to see why no single plan can stand alone.

(1) Mitigation Plan

Definition: A mitigation plan consists of measures designed to reduce or eliminate the impact
of disasters before they occur.
Purpose
• Minimize loss of life and property.
• Reduce disaster vulnerability.
Example: Building flood embankments along rivers to reduce flood damage.

(2) Preparedness Plan

Definition: A preparedness plan outlines actions and resources required to prepare for a
disaster before it happens.
Purpose
• Improve readiness.
• Reduce confusion during emergencies.
Example: Conducting earthquake evacuation drills in schools.

(3) Response Plan

Definition: A response plan describes the immediate actions to be taken during and
immediately after a disaster.
Purpose
• Save lives.
• Meet urgent needs of affected people.
Example: Deploying rescue teams and ambulances after an earthquake.

(4) Recovery Plan

Definition: A recovery plan focuses on restoring normal conditions after a disaster.
Purpose
• Support affected communities.
• Resume economic and social activities.
Example: Restoring damaged roads after floods.

8
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

(5) Reconstruction Plan

Definition: A reconstruction plan involves the long-term rebuilding of damaged infrastructure
and facilities after a disaster.
Purpose
• Reduce future disaster risk.
• Rebuild stronger and safer structures.
Example: Constructing earthquake-resistant houses after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake.

(6) Contingency Plan

Definition: A contingency plan is a pre-arranged plan for specific disaster scenarios that may
occur unexpectedly.
Purpose
• Prepare for worst-case situations.
• Enable rapid decision-making.
Example: A district administration preparing a contingency plan for severe flooding during
the monsoon season.

(7) Evacuation Plan

Definition: An evacuation plan provides procedures for the safe and organized movement of
people from dangerous areas to safe locations.
Purpose
• Protect lives.
• Prevent panic.
Example: Moving residents from low-lying flood-prone areas to higher ground before a flood
arrives.

9
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 4: Phases of Disaster Management

The disaster management cycle is commonly divided into three time-based phases — before,
during, and after a disaster — each containing its own set of activities and objectives.
This time-based view is useful because it clarifies which organizations and individuals are
responsible for which actions at each stage. Government agencies, engineers, and planners are
most active before a disaster (through mitigation and preparedness); emergency responders,
medical teams, and rescue workers take the lead during a disaster; and development agencies,
local governments, and communities themselves drive the work afterward, during recovery and
reconstruction.

(1) Before Disaster — Pre-Disaster Phase

This phase focuses on reducing risk and preparing communities before a disaster occurs. It
consists of two core activities: mitigation and preparedness.

(A) Mitigation
Definition: Mitigation consists of measures taken to reduce the probability and impact of
disasters.
• Reduce vulnerability.
• Minimize future losses.
• Land use planning.
• Earthquake-resistant buildings.
Example: Building a flood protection wall along a river to reduce flood damage.

(B) Preparedness
Definition: Preparedness involves planning and organizing resources to ensure an effective
response during a disaster.
• Improve readiness.
• Reduce panic and confusion.
• Emergency drills and training.
• Early warning systems.
Example: Conducting evacuation drills before the flood season.

(2) During Disaster — Emergency Phase

Response
Definition: Response refers to immediate actions taken during and immediately after a disaster
to save lives and reduce suffering.
• Provide emergency assistance.
• Save lives.
• Medical treatment.
• Evacuation of affected people.

10
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Example: Rescuing trapped people after an earthquake and providing emergency medical
care.

(3) After Disaster — Post-Disaster Phase

This phase focuses on restoring normal conditions and rebuilding affected communities. It
consists of two stages: recovery and reconstruction.

(A) Recovery
Definition: Recovery involves restoring essential services and helping affected communities
return to normal life.
• Support affected populations.
• Resume economic activities.
• Clean affected areas.
• Restoring electricity and water supply.
Example: Restoring water and electricity systems after a flood.

(B) Reconstruction
Definition: Reconstruction is the long-term rebuilding of damaged infrastructure and facilities.
• Rebuild stronger and safer structures.
• Promote sustainable development.
• Rebuilding houses, roads, bridges, and schools.
Example: Constructing earthquake-resistant houses after the 2005 Kashmir earthquake.

Simple Diagram of the Cycle

Before Disaster → Mitigation + Preparedness
During Disaster → Response
After Disaster → Recovery + Reconstruction

11
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 5: Emerging Challenges in Disaster Management

Disaster management is becoming more complex due to changing environmental, social, and
economic conditions. New and emerging challenges increase disaster risk and make it more
difficult to protect communities and infrastructure.

Climate Change
Climate change is one of the biggest challenges in disaster management. Rising global
temperatures are increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.
Impacts
• More frequent floods.
• Glacier melting and Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs).
Example: Pakistan faces increased flood risks due to intense monsoon rainfall and glacier
melting in the northern areas.

Rapid Urbanization
Rapid population growth and urban expansion have led to unplanned development in many
cities.
Impacts
• Urban flooding.
• Overloaded infrastructure.
Example: Construction in floodplains and along riverbanks increases flood vulnerability.

Infrastructure Vulnerability
Many buildings, roads, bridges, and utility systems are old, poorly maintained, or not designed
to withstand disasters.
Impacts
• Building collapse during earthquakes.
• Bridge failures during floods.
Example: Weak infrastructure suffered major damage during the 2005 earthquake and the
2010 floods in Pakistan.

Weak Early Warning Systems

Many communities do not receive timely and accurate warnings before disasters occur.
Impacts
• Delayed evacuation.
Example: Remote areas may receive flood warnings too late to take protective action.

Public Awareness Gaps

Many people lack knowledge about disaster risks and preparedness measures.
Impacts

12
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

• Increased vulnerability.
Example: People living in flood-prone areas may not know evacuation routes or emergency
procedures.

Addressing These Challenges

These five challenges are described as 'emerging' because they are intensifying over time
rather than staying constant, which means disaster management strategies must continually
adapt. Addressing them effectively requires integrating climate projections into planning,
enforcing building codes in rapidly growing cities, investing in infrastructure maintenance,
modernizing early warning technology, and running sustained public awareness campaigns at
the community level.

13
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Part 6: Legal and Institutional Framework of Disaster

Management in Pakistan (NDMA Act 2010)
The NDMA Act 2010 is the primary law governing disaster management in Pakistan. It provides
a comprehensive framework for managing disasters and establishes institutions responsible for
disaster management at the national, provincial, federal, and district levels.
The Act was introduced in the aftermath of major disasters such as the 2005 Kashmir
earthquake, which exposed the absence of a unified, legally backed system for coordinating
disaster response across different levels of government. By creating a clear chain of authorities
— from the federal commission down to district administrations — the Act aims to ensure that
responsibility, funding, and decision-making power are clearly defined before a disaster occurs,
not improvised afterward.

Institutional Framework
The disaster management structure in Pakistan operates at four levels:

1. National Level
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA)
Role and Functions
• Provides technical guidance and support.
• Manages disaster response during major emergencies.
• Coordinates disaster management activities nationwide.

2. Provincial Level
Provincial Disaster Management Authorities (PDMAs)
Functions
• Conduct awareness and preparedness programs.
• Develop provincial disaster management plans.
• Coordinate disaster response within the province.
Examples: PDMA KPK, PDMA Punjab, PDMA Sindh.

3. District Level
District Disaster Management Authorities (DDMAs)
Functions
• Prepare district disaster management plans.
• Coordinate local emergency response.
• Conduct community awareness programs.

4. Federal Level
National Disaster Management Commission (NDMC)
Functions

14
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

• Provides overall guidance and supervision.

• Approves national disaster management plans.

Key Features of the NDMA Act 2010

1. Comprehensive Legal Framework
Provides a legal basis for disaster management in Pakistan.

2. Multi-Level Institutional Structure

The Act establishes:

Level Authority
National NDMA
Provincial PDMAs
District DDMAs

3. Coordination and Collaboration

Promotes cooperation among government agencies, the private sector, NGOs, and
communities.

4. Integrated Disaster Management Approach

Covers all phases of the disaster management cycle:
• Mitigation
• Preparedness
• Response
• Recovery
• Reconstruction

15
 Disaster Risk Management — Final Term Course

Conclusion
Taken together, this course traces a single thread from real-world impact to organized
response. The case studies of the 2010 Pakistan Floods and the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake
show how natural hazards translate into human suffering, economic loss, environmental
damage, and long-term social disruption when communities and infrastructure are not
adequately prepared. The concepts of disaster planning and disaster management provide the
theoretical foundation for addressing this — turning lessons from past disasters into structured
risk assessment, preparedness, response, and recovery.
The seven types of plans — mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, reconstruction,
contingency, and evacuation — translate these concepts into practical tools, each suited to a
particular moment in the disaster timeline. The three-phase cycle (before, during, and after a
disaster) organizes these tools chronologically, clarifying who must act and when. Meanwhile,
the emerging challenges of climate change, rapid urbanization, infrastructure vulnerability, weak
early warning systems, and public awareness gaps remind us that disaster risk is not static — it
continues to evolve, demanding continuous adaptation of plans and systems.
Finally, the legal and institutional framework established by the NDMA Act 2010 shows how
these ideas are implemented in practice in Pakistan, through a coordinated, multi-level system
spanning the federal, national, provincial, and district levels. Effective disaster risk management,
ultimately, depends on combining sound engineering, clear legal authority, accurate scientific
understanding of hazards, and genuine community participation — so that when the next
disaster occurs, the response is guided by preparation rather than improvisation.

16