Original Article ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts

ISSN (Online): 2582-7472 January-June 2024 5(1), 1458–1467

PROACTIVE RISK IDENTIFICATION IN THE CHANGING AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY: A

COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK

Harshil Wadhwana 1 , Dr. Megha Shah 2

1 PhD Research Scholar, Faculty of Management, GLS University, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management, GLS University, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India

ABSTRACT
Advancements in technology, shifts in consumer preferences, and revised regulations are all
propelling rapid growth in the automotive industry. Traditional approaches to risk management
are insufficient when confronted with the emerging risks presented by this transition. Adopting a
proactive approach to detecting hazards is essential for successfully navigating this constantly
evolving world. The present work presents a comprehensive framework for the proactive
Corresponding Author identification and management of risks within the ever-changing automotive sector. The essay
Harshil Wadhwana, commences with providing an overview of the industry's historical context and current
harshil.wadhwana93@[Link] advancements, followed by an analysis of the inadequacy of conventional risk management
DOI methods facing emerging risks. Furthermore, it proposes a complete framework specifically
10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.169 tailored to tackle the unique challenges faced by the automotive sector. Implementing a
9 comprehensive approach to risk management, this framework integrates assessments of
technology, markets, legislation, cybersecurity, and supply chain vulnerabilities. The analysis
Funding: This research received no proceeds to discuss potential issues associated with implementing this methodology and offers
specific grant from any funding agency in remedies to overcome them. In order to enhance their decision-making and resilience in the face
the public, commercial, or not-for-profit of industry-wide complexity, stakeholders in the automobile sector might adopt a pre-emptive
sectors. approach to risk management. This study contributes to our knowledge of proactive risk
management strategies and enhances our understanding of future risk identification in the
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).
automobile industry. Methodology: By employing this approach, these enterprises can enhance
This work is licensed under a Creative their ability to make well-informed judgements on their risk management plans. The technique
Commons Attribution 4.0 facilitates the identification of critical vulnerabilities, therefore enabling the implementation of
International License. preventive measures to mitigate the effects of specific risks on net income. Moreover, the model
With the license CC-BY, authors retain possesses the capability to undertake data analysis from multiple companies within the same
the copyright, allowing anyone to industry, thereby offering potential insights that can be extrapolated to other similar organisations.
download, reuse, re-print, modify, This has the potential to result in enhanced risk management strategies within India's automobile
distribute, and/or copy their industry
contribution. The work must be
properly attributed to its author. Keywords: Automotive Industry, Proactive Risk Identification, Risk Assessment,
Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

1. INTRODUCTION
The automotive industry, which is at the front of continuous innovation, is
continuously influenced by rapid technical advancements, changing consumer
preferences, and regulatory mechanisms. Industry stakeholders are compelled to
reassess conventional risk management approaches because of the multitude of
new challenges and uncertainties arising from this continuous transformation.
Effectively navigating a dynamic environment requires the ability to actively
identify, evaluate, and mitigate potential hazards. Although reactive strategies have
traditionally been the foundation of risk management in the automotive sector, they
may not always be sufficient to address the intricate risks presented by factors such
How to cite this article (APA): Wadhwana, H., and Shah, M. (2024). Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive 1458
Industry: A Comprehensive Framework. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1458–1467. doi:
10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1699
 Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive Industry: A Comprehensive Framework

as supply chain weaknesses, legislative modifications, technical progress, market

fluctuations, and cybercrime [1].
In light of the industry's transition towards electrification, connectivity,
autonomous vehicles, and shared mobility, a fresh approach to risk management is
necessary. These developments contribute to the heightened complexity and
interdependence of hazards. This research paper introduces a comprehensive and
proactive architecture that is especially tailored to adjust to the constantly evolving
automobile sector in order to address this urgent problem. This conceptual
framework seeks to offer a holistic method for identifying and managing risks by
integrating several elements, including technical risk assessment, in-depth market
analysis, regulatory anticipation, cybersecurity measures, and supply chain
resilience [2].
This paper presents an analysis of the historical evolution of the automobile
industry and evaluates current trends to demonstrate the insufficiency of current
risk management paradigms and the necessity for a more forward-thinking
approach. The objective of this study is to contribute to the current knowledge on
proactive risk detection in the automotive industry by introducing a thorough
methodology [3].
The Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) system is a risk
assessment tool that enables users to identify hazards and estimate the inherent risk
associated with each hazard. This risk assessment tool will identify and underscore
the potential hazards associated with each departmental work. Estimation and
classification of dangers will occur subsequent to hazard identification. An analysis
of obstacles in green supply chain management using the Integrated Supply Chain
Model (ISM): A case study of the Indian automobile industry. Recommended control
measures will be proposed if the evaluated risk exceeds the low-risk level.
Furthermore, the user has the option to enhance the existing information system by
including new work plans, processes, and control mechanisms.
Furthermore, the paper will delineate certain challenges in implementing this
proactive framework and offer tactics to surmount them. Cultivating a proactive risk
management culture can ultimately enhance the decision-making, inventiveness,
and resilience of stakeholders in the automotive sector when confronted with
complexity. The primary objective of this study is to further the transformative path
of the automobile industry by establishing the foundation for a proactive risk
management paradigm that can effectively navigate uncertainty and capitalise on
emerging prospects [4].
Figure 1

Figure 1 Framework for Risk Management (Hopkins (2012)

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1459

 Harshil Wadhwana, and Dr. Megha Shah

2. RELATED WORKS
As part of their evaluation of the CSR agenda, risk managers should look for
ways to apply risk management strategies and tools to other areas of focus.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the larger corporate governance agenda
(CG) may benefit from the same risk management methodology as risk assessment,
control measure identification, and compliance audits. It is the purpose of this
article to examine several quantitative models for risk management in the supply
chain. It also looks at the literature on supply chain risk management (SCRM) and
how different solutions compare to real-world implementations. This document has
a triple purpose. We begin by creating a standard method for categorizing SCRM
content. Secondly, we are crossing our fingers that our review will help scholars
make sense of the mountain of literature on this vital topic. Third, we intend to
encourage scholars to create new models for reducing supply chain interruptions
by drawing attention to the disconnect between theory and reality [5]. Businesses
nowadays are confronted with a heightened degree of danger. Continuous risk
assessment is a must for businesses. Due to the interdependencies of risks and
events and the difficulty of obtaining appropriate data, risk modeling is an arduous
undertaking. This paper's goal is to present a continuously updated model for
enterprise risk assessment [6]. This article delves at the impact of a supply chain
interruption in a dual-sourcing scenario. The three-tiered supply chain is depicted
using a system dynamics model. In order to determine whether inventory
replenishment policy responds better in the case of an interruption, two policies are
being studied: APIOBPCS and APVIOBPCS [7]. The development of the ISM diagraph
reveals the interdependent nature of the obstacles. The government's assistance
and production technological skills stand out as the most important variables, with
a moderate level of reliance and high driving power [8]. New forms of NPD and their
effects on risk framing are the primary foci of this study. In this paper, we integrate
the notions of NPD with the complexity theory concept of CAS. Emerging NPD
categories can be better understood from a CAS viewpoint. Because of their unique
nature, emphasis, and method of product development, new NPD types have a
distinct strategy for risk framing if they are to offer adequate risk management
within the context of an NPD [9]. A comprehensive literature evaluation utilizing
descriptive, thematic, and content analysis of 354 papers published between 2000
and 2016. Classifying risks and suggesting ways to lessen their impact have received
a lot of attention. There has been less theoretical grounding in the research, with an
emphasis on organizational reactions to supply chain hazards. There are ten main
areas where study should go from here [10]. In this article, we show how to establish
a sustainable supply chain management framework and how to put it into action
using two analytical steps. In an exchange relationship, we combine objective
metrics for environmental impact, economic impact (costs and benefits), social
impact, and risk with subjective metrics for penalties, intangible risk, and
transaction costs (using tools like balanced scorecard). With the proposed
methodology—which is based on math programming with the three elements and a
parameter, it is possible to find the best solution for a given collection of piece-wise
Verified and approved [11]. With the help of AHP, managers are able to prioritize
supply chain objectives, choose the best supplier out of several options, and detect
risk indicators and the impact of undesirable occurrences and cause and effect links
throughout the chain. Understanding how to use cognitive maps and Analytic
Hierarchy Process to detect and evaluate supply chain risk in various product
categories is the main goal of this article [12]. Analysis of potential dangers to the
ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1460
 Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive Industry: A Comprehensive Framework

car industry's supply chain: Too little is known about models tailored to the
automobile sector. The international network and large number of multitier
suppliers give the automotive supply chain its unique complexity. Beyond demand
uncertainty, there are other potential threats to the automotive supply chain that
need more research. These include call-back risk and the best ways to construct a
robust network [13]. Based on statistics pertaining to global, EU, and domestic
output, our study has shown the importance of the automobile sector. Information
that has an impact on Hungary's present situation is the most crucial [14]. According
to the results, SMEs may successfully lower their OSR in one of three ways: directly,
through supplier integration, or by focusing on the three aspects of buyer-supplier
social capital. It is proven that OSR has a detrimental effect on the operational
performances of SMEs and that supplier integration mediates the link between
social capital and OSR [15]. Iranian financial institutions that were either listed on
the stock market or held a license from the country's central bank (CBI) made up
the study's sample. This study used a new metric to measure the application of ERM.
In addition, two metrics for organizational success were Tobin's Q ratio and return
on equity (ROE). Unlike return on equity (ROE), which did not exhibit a positive and
statistically significant association with ERM adoption, Tobin's Q ratio did.
According to the results, an ERM strategy has a greater impact on a company's long-
term success than on its short-term success [16]. An examination of risk assessment
and threat analysis as they pertain to the automobile industry is presented in this
study. To start, a new way of categorizing various TARA approaches has been
suggested. We compared and assessed the available methodologies. After that, we
compared the performance of many widely used tools that are applied to TARA.
Next, a method called attack-defense mapping is suggested for determining which
mitigations are most suited to the system's identified vulnerabilities and threats.
Finally, we have covered the future plans for TARA's expansion in the automobile
industry [17]. The new energy vehicle sector in Jiangsu province was assessed for
risk in July 2019 using the entropy weight-cloud model. Exogenous risk had a bigger
effect on the industry than endogenous risk, according to the results, and industrial
risk was somewhat higher than medium risk. Improving the industry's internal risk
resistance and strengthening the industry's soft environment are two of the many
proposals made for preventing risk in the business [18]. Research from various
nations was compared with this one's conclusions. The study's caveats were
carefully considered, and we concluded that future comparison studies including
small, medium, and big businesses on a global scale are urgently needed [19]. The
logical approach to improving the risk assessment system involves determining the
causal link between non-compliance and potential repercussions across different
requirements levels. This employer will intentionally enhance working conditions
using its own resources, considering local production characteristics, and intending
to attain specified targets. Additionally, employees might be informed about
regulatory mismatches and their potential health and safety implications [20].
Business Excellence via assessed risk can lead to better customer satisfaction than
technology leadership. With a Permanent, low-risk category, consider feasible
control methods.
A mould facility with four diametric lines and Kunkel Wagner line is
recommended. Users can add an in-house pattern and die shop with CAD/CAM, new
work plans, tasks, and control measures to the CAE de fonds system, which
specializes in ductile manufacturing, to update current information [21]. The survey
revealed that Indian retirees can invest up to a specified amount under the pension
program. Pension investment and capital market development stimulate country's
economic development at a wide scale and increase pension investment returns,
ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1461
 Harshil Wadhwana, and Dr. Megha Shah

according to the study. This supports pension fund investment, which can boost the
country's capital market [22]. Over the past 20 years, the number of publications on
automotive supply chain disruption risk management has progressively expanded
from five in 2000 to 105 in 2021. This suggests society and academia are paying
more attention to automotive supply chain disruption risk management studies.
Identifying influential books, authors, and research clusters/themes [23]. Long and
complicated supply chains, as well as the supply chain procedures that companies
use, are two factors that make supply chains more vulnerable, according to the
research. Experts can strengthen supply chains by taking suitable mitigation actions
after conducting relative assessments of susceptibility elements. Contributing to the
development of a model for internal, controlled supply chain vulnerability variables
is this research [24].

3. RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR

In the past, reactive tactics were the mainstay of risk management in the
automobile industry, with an emphasis on quickly resolving specific, easily
identified problems. While these conventional approaches work well for handling
well-known risks, such as production flaws or interruptions in the supply chain,
they frequently fail to deal with the new and complicated hazards that are a part of
today's automotive industry. The shortcomings of these conventional methods are
becoming more and more exposed as a result of these revolutionary shifts.
Cybersecurity threats, software vulnerabilities, and the unknowns surrounding the
adoption of new technology are just a few examples of the additional dimensions of
danger brought about by the recent proliferation of technical innovations like
electric and driverless automobiles.
The systematic examination of possible hazards within an operational
framework is the basis of Risk Identification and Risk Assessment (RIRA). This all-
encompassing method entails answering three basic questions about risk: hazard,
which looks at possible bad things that may happen; consequences, which looks at
how bad those things could be; and likelihood, which looks at how likely it is that
these bad things will happen. An RIRA research has a multipronged ultimate goal.
The primary objective is to thoroughly investigate and assess any potential risks
related to operating procedures, services, persons, and equipment. Second, it tries
to identify the current protections that lessen these dangers [25]. The research also
hopes to suggest further management strategies that might bring these risks even
lower to a manageable level. Crucial to this process is the development of a Risk
Register, which will play an essential role in continuously tracking these risks,
identifying changes, and checking that measures are working as intended.
Risk Identification and Risk Assessment is a very thorough and targeted
investigation. It entails breaking down the complex processes that run a plant into
its component parts and studying them in great detail. Possible risks to workers'
health and safety are uncovered as a result of this thorough investigation. The next
thing to do is use a Risk Matrix to combine the likelihood and impact of each risk in
order to determine the degree of risk. Furthermore, the study thoroughly examines
the current control mechanisms and offers insightful suggestions for new actions to
reduce risks to a reasonable level based on these results. It is impossible to
exaggerate the importance of RIRA. Because risk assessment and hazard
identification are the bedrock of risk mitigation techniques, it is the central tenet of
risk management initiatives [26]. The most cost-effective way to guarantee the
process or activity will continue to run safely in the future is to do risk analysis at

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1462

 Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive Industry: A Comprehensive Framework

the beginning of the project, while it is still in its early phases. In addition, the
understanding of hazards that come from these investigations is essential for a
facility to implement different process safety management actions. Ineffective
resource allocation or unintentional exposure to dangers above the community's or
company's actual tolerance limits might arise from any risk assessment error.
A RIRA study can be carried out at any point in a project's life cycle, including
the conceptual, preliminary, and detailed design stages, as well as during building,
operation, decommissioning, or destruction. In most cases, it is more cost-effective
to eliminate or manage a danger if it is detected early, particularly during the
conceptual design stages [27]. Research conducted at various points in time meets
unique contextual needs; this includes work done in engineering or corporate
offices during the design phase, as well as work done in the plant environment prior
to decommissioning, during operation, or during start-up.

4. IDENTIFYING RISK FACTORS, METHODS AND EVALUATING

RISK
Identification of the risk factors such as Technological Advancements, Market
Dynamics, Regulatory Changes, Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and Environmental
and Social Risks plays an important role. It is important to identify the dangers that
are linked with developing technologies such as software-driven functionality,
artificial intelligence, networking, and autonomous and electric cars [28].
Cybersecurity threats, software vulnerabilities, data breaches, and functional
failures of the system are all examples of potential risks. The identification of
hazards and the evaluation of risks. Examine the alterations in the market, the
shifting tastes of consumers, and the worldwide trends that are having an effect on
the automobile industry. Determine the risks that are associated with changes in
demand, new competitors, fluctuations in consumer expectations, and disruptions
in the market that are brought about by new entrants or shifting preferences.
Maintain an up-to-date knowledge of the ever-changing regulatory landscapes that
comprise safety standards, pollution laws, trade rules, and compliance needs in
various locations. The risks connected with non-compliance, the uncertainty of
regulatory requirements, and the possible influence on product development and
market are all things that need to be identified. Assess the risks that are present
within the automotive supply chain, such as reliance on key suppliers, geopolitical
conflicts that have an influence on sourcing, interruptions in logistics, quality
control concerns, and environmental considerations that have an impact on
sourcing sites. conduct an analysis of the dangers that are connected to issues of
sustainability, environmental repercussions, labour practices, and social
obligations. These characteristics have the potential to affect how consumers
perceive a brand, as well as compliance with regulations and reputation.
Some primary concerns regarding risk are:
• Risk - Can something bad happen?
• How terrible would the repercussions be?
• How frequently is it likely to occur?
The identification of risk factors and the assessment of hazards within the ever-
changing landscape of the automobile industry calls for a strategy that is both
proactive and complex. The stakeholders in the automotive industry can better
navigate uncertainties and position themselves to capitalize on opportunities while
simultaneously minimizing potential disruptions if they recognize potential risks

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1463

 Harshil Wadhwana, and Dr. Megha Shah

early on, conduct thorough assessments, prioritize mitigation efforts, and

continuously monitor the environment. In order to evaluate risks, it is necessary to
conduct both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Utilize data-driven analysis
wherever it is appropriate to do so, such as through the use of statistical tools,
simulations, or financial models. In addition, qualitative evaluations that include the
opinions of specialists, scenario planning, and the examination of historical data can
give useful insights.
We are particularly interested in the following risk categories out of all the
possible ones: The following hazards are identified based on the relative positions
of the object and the source of danger:
1) Systemic: Dangers stemming from improper internal operations,
uncontrollable external factors (force majeure), and making decisions in
the face of ambiguity.
2) According to their impact, which determines the necessity of preventive
measures, viability impacts are classified as either insignificant, tolerable,
or excessive.
3) A risk is considered insurable if it can be transferred to an insurance
company, and non-insurable if no such products are available.
4) When does it happen? There are three distinct types of risks: retrospective,
present, and prospective. It is easier to assess the former two types with
knowledge about the former.
5) Impact on business and drivers: establishes a five-point scale from "very
high" to "insignificant" to measure the seriousness of potential outcomes.
An improved version of the Elmery index, the suggested MIR index classifies
safety requirement mismatches as either "mandatory" (M), "important," or
"recommendations," providing a thorough framework for risk assessment. To
indicate the relative importance of each level in terms of potential harm to workers'
health on the job, we've given them numerical values: M = 3, I = 2, and R = 1. By
providing a thorough assessment of safety compliance, this index helps to prioritize
tasks and highlight key areas that require quick attention.
The MIR index is more than just an evaluation tool; it's a useful instrument for
constant workplace communication and monitoring. Employees are able to track
changes in safety levels through regular measurements and the sharing of
information, which promotes a sense of shared responsibility for improving safety.
On top of that, it serves as helpful criticism that promotes growth without coming
off as critical. To put it into practice, certification control systems use the MIR index
to assess whether or not an employer follows labour protection laws. As a
foundation for creating safety assessment processes tailored to each workplace, it
takes into account the three different degrees of requirement significance (M, I, and
R). Using a "comply-does not comply" methodology, these processes allow for
thorough evaluations of every workplace. Efforts to improve working conditions
and reduce hazards can be objectively measured by the MIR index. In addition to
facilitating compliance monitoring within the context of labour protection
legislation, it encourages ongoing improvements. Its practical application is further
enhanced by the creation of workplace-specific safety assessment methods, which
ensure a holistic approach to risk assessment and management.

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1464

 Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive Industry: A Comprehensive Framework

5. CONCLUSION
B.V. Kisulenko's work on vehicle safety evaluation, which introduced a matrix
for complicated design safety, is highlighted by the observation. This matrix
provides a quantitative rating of a vehicle's safety level by taking into account the
reliability and consistency of expert assessments of the impact of operational
parameters on possible damage risks while driving. According to Kisulenko, 𝜑𝜑 is a
complicated security indicator that takes into account expert evaluations, matrix
size, design implementation coefficients, and weighting to indicate the effect of
design features on individual damage risks. In addition, the observation cites many
sources on risk assessment methodologies, classifying them as either quantitative
or qualitative, and determining whether they are suitable in situations of complete
or partial certainty. Although they are time- and resource-intensive, expert
approaches that rely on point scales and the judgments of subject-matter experts
provide versatility across fields. Despite their adaptability, these approaches
present difficulties in interpretation because they are subjective and depend on the
opinion of experts.
Additionally, the observation addresses the shortcomings of expert
methodologies and proposes new approaches to risk assessments that use
quantifiable indicators to reduce interpretational subjectivity. Despite their
limitations, analytical and computational approaches allow for quantitative risk
assessment, which is especially useful when statistical data is scarce. on situations
when there is a lack of comprehensive statistical data, these strategies, which are
grounded on mathematical relationships between indicators, are more suited for
real-world use. The importance of analytical and computational methods in
identifying potential risks and facilitating decision-making processes regarding
vehicle design modifications or rejections is further highlighted, as is the
significance of considering risk assessment during the vehicle design or solid
modelling stages.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.

REFERENCES
E. Bayer and G. O. Bustad, Introducing Risk Management Process to a Manufacturing
Industry. 2012. [Online].
M. Marufuzzaman, S. D. Eksioglu, X. Li, and J. Wang, “Analyzing the impact of
intermodal-related risk to the design and management of biofuel supply
chain,” Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev, vol. 69, no. 2014, pp. 122–145, 2014,
doi: 10.1016/[Link].2014.06.008.
D. Dominic, S. Chhawri, R. M. Eustice, D. Ma, and A. Weimerskirch, “Risk assessment
for cooperative automated driving,” CPS-SPC 2016 - Proceedings of the 2nd
ACM Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and PrivaCy, co-located
with CCS 2016, pp. 47–58, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2994487.2994499.

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1465

 Harshil Wadhwana, and Dr. Megha Shah

M. Giannakis and T. Papadopoulos, “Supply chain sustainability: A risk management

approach,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 171, pp. 455–470, 2016, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2015.06.032.
C. S. Tang, “Perspectives in supply chain risk management,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 103,
no. 2, pp. 451–488, 2006, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2005.12.006.
K. Words, “Risk assessment of India automotive enterprises using Bayesian
networks,” Risk assessment of India automotive enterprises using Bayesian
networks Abstract:, 2009.
Musa S.N., Supply Chain Risk Management: Identification, Evaluation and Mitigation
Techniques, no. 1459. 2012.
G. Dwivedi, S. K. Srivastava, and R. K. Srivastava, Analysis of barriers to implement
additive manufacturing technology in the Indian automotive sector, vol. 47,
no. 10. 2017. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2017-0222.
M. Vu, “Risk Management in Complex New Product Development Projects-the
Automotive Industry Perspective Kühne Institute for Logistics
Management,” no. February, 2018.
Y. Fan and M. Stevenson, “A review of supply chain risk management: definition,
theory, and research agenda,” International Journal of Physical Distribution
and Logistics Management, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 205–230, 2018, doi:
10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0043.
V. K. Dubey, J. P. Chavas, and D. Veeramani, “Analytical framework for sustainable
supply-chain contract management,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 200, pp. 240–261,
2018, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2018.03.003.
M. Mital, M. Del Giudice, and A. Papa, “Comparing supply chain risks for multiple
product categories with cognitive mapping and Analytic Hierarchy Process,”
Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 131, no. May, pp. 159–170, 2018, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2017.05.036.
S. Zhu, “Scholarship at UWindsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and
Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers SUPPLY CHAIN RISK
MANAGEMENT IN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY,” 2018, [Online].
A. Koncz, L. Pokorádi, and Z. C. Johanyák, “Risk Analysis in the Automotive Industry,”
Repüléstudományi Közlemények, no. March 2021, pp. 119–124, 2019, doi:
10.32560/rk.2019.3.274.
P. Chowdhury, K. H. Lau, and S. Pittayachawan, “Operational supply risk mitigation
of SME and its impact on operational performance: A social capital
perspective,” International Journal of Operations and Production
Management, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 478–502, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-09-
2017-0561.
A. K. Nasr, S. Alaei, F. Bakhshi, F. Rasoulyan, H. Tayaran, and M. Farahi, “How
enterprise risk management (ERM) can affect on short-term and long-term
firm performance: Evidence from the Iranian banking system,”
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1387–1403,
2019, doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(41).
F. Luo, Y. Jiang, Z. Zhang, Y. Ren, and S. Hou, “Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment
for Connected Vehicles: A Survey,” Security and Communication Networks,
vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/1263820.
Y. Cao, Y. Bian, R. Wang, and L. Wang, “Research on the Risk Assessment of New
Energy Automobile Industry Based on Entropy Weight-Cloud Model in
China’s Jiangsu Province,” Math Probl Eng, vol. 2021, 2021, doi:
10.1155/2021/4714681.

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1466

 Proactive Risk Identification in The Changing Automotive Industry: A Comprehensive Framework

M. J. Ligarski, B. Rożałowska, and K. Kalinowski, “A study of the human factor in

industry 4.0 based on the automotive industry,” Energies (Basel), vol. 14, no.
20, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14206833.
M. V. Kapitonov, “Evaluation and Analysis of Risks in Automotive Industry,”
Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 61, pp. 556–560, 2022, doi:
10.1016/[Link].2022.01.090.
N. Dhinakaran and M. Balachandar, “Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in
Windows Plant,” … in Science and …, no. May, pp. 367–372, 2022, [Online].
A. Tyagi and A. Singh, “The Pension Fund Investments Role in Financing and
Enabling Global Development in Indian Market,” vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1125–
1132, 2023.
K. Huang, J. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Automotive Supply Chain Disruption Risk
Management: A Visualization Analysis Based on Bibliometric,” Processes,
vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11030710.
S. K. Sharma, P. R. Srivastava, A. Kumar, A. Jindal, and S. Gupta, Supply chain
vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry, vol. 326, no. 2.
Springer US, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04155-4.
N. Yoga Irsyadillah and S. Dadang, “a Literature Review of Supply Chain Risk
Management in Automotive Industry,” Journal of Modern Manufacturing
Systems and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 12–22, 2020, doi:
10.15282/jmmst.v4i2.5020.
L. Mirboroon and H. Razavi, “A Case Study of Risk Management of Automotive
Industry Projects Using RFMEA Method,” Mapta Journal of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering (MJMIE), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2020, doi:
10.33544/mjmie.v4i1.132.
I. Mzougui, S. Carpitella, A. Certa, Z. El Felsoufi, and J. Izquierdo, “Assessing supply
chain risks in the automotive industry through a modified MCDM-Based
FMECA,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3390/PR8050579.
A. Meena, S. Dhir, and Sushil, “An analysis of growth-accelerating factors for the
Indian automotive industry using modified TISM,” International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1361–1392,
2021, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0047.

ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts 1467