SFAQ Issue-19 Web
SFAQ Issue-19 Web
EXHIBITION
A S P EC I A L C U R ATO R I A L P R OJ EC T W I T H
R I R K R I T T I R AVA N I J A :
THE WAY THINGS GO
Arin Rungjang, Golden Teardrop (installation view), 2013. Courtesy of the artist and the Office of Contemporary Art and Culture
O N V I E W F E B 1 3 – M AY 2 4
YBCA .ORG/RIRKRIT
See paintings by many of the greatest artists from the Renaissance to the 20th century—
including El Greco, Rembrandt, Vermeer, Monet, Gauguin, and Picasso—in an exclusive
NATE BOYCE:
West Coast presentation of 55 works from the National Galleries of Scotland.
P O LY S C R O L L
MARCH 7–MAY 31, 2015 This exhibition is organized by the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco and the National Galleries of Scotland. Presenting ON VIEW JAN 23–APR 5
Sponsors: Cynthia Fry Gunn and John A. Gunn, and Diane B. Wilsey. Director’s Circle: The Estate of Merrill and Hedy
HERBST EXHIBITION GALLERIES Thruston. President’s Circle: San Francisco Auxiliary of the Fine Arts Museums. Curator’s Circle: The Bernard Osher
[Link]/NATE-BOYCE
de Young
Foundation and the Ednah Root Foundation. Patron’s Circle: Phoebe Cowles and Robert Girard, and George and Marie
Hecksher. Supporter’s Circle: Andy and Carrick McLaughlin and Mrs. George Hopper Fitch. The exhibition is supported
by an indemnity from the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities. NATE BOYCE, POLYSCROLL II, 2015
HD VIDEO , COURTESY THE ARTIST AND ALTMAN SIEGEL GALLERY
Golden Gate Park • [Link] Paul Gauguin, Three Tahitians (detail), 1899. Oil on canvas. Scottish National Gallery
YERBA BUENA CENTER FOR THE ARTS • [Link] • [Link]
BRUCE CONNER: SOMEBODY ELSE’S PRINTS CROWN POINT PRESS
20 hawthorne Street San Francisco CA 94105 415-974-6273 [Link]
FEBRUARY 7 – MAY 16, 2015
what's in a line?
featuring prints by
richard diebenkorn, Joel fisher, al held, anish kapoor,
bertrand lavier, sol lewitt, tom marioni, Julie mehretu,
dorothy napangardi, nathan oliveira,
markus raetz and pat steir
wayne thiebaud
EIghT NEW ETChINgS
San Jose Institute of Contemporary Art Bruce Conner: Somebody Else’s Prints is organized by the Ulrich Museum of Art,
Wichita State University. The ICA presentation is generously supported by Applied in the GalleRY thROUGh MaRCh 6, 2015
560 South First Street Materials Foundation, The Mercy and Roger Smullen Family Trust, John Green and
Martin Fox, and members of the ICA Directors Circle.
San Jose, CA 95113
Bombhead, 2002, Pigmented inkjet print on paper, 32 x 25 inches, Courtesy
408.283.8155, [Link] Magnolia Editions, Oakland, CA ©2014 Conner Family Trust, San Francisco /
Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Tom Sachs, Model One, 1999. Mixed media. 32 x 41 x 14 inches. Collection of Shelley Fox Aarons and Philip Aarons, New York. Image courtesy Tom Sachs Studio.
Also on view at the Betty and Edward Marcus Sculpture Park at Laguna Gloria:
Tom Sachs Exhibition Support: Shelley Fox Aarons and Philip Aarons, Tom Healy and Fred P. Hochberg, Hotel Saint Cecilia, Hotel San Jose, Jeffrey’s, This project is supported in part by the Cultural Arts Division of the City of Austin Economic
Nancy and Dr. Robert Magoon, The Moody Foundation, The Nightingale Code Foundation, John and Amy Phelan, Vision Fund Leaders and Contributors Development Department, a grant from the Texas Commission on the Arts, and by an award
Museum Support: Alice Kleberg Reynolds Foundation, Bank of America, Oxford Commercial, Pedernales Cellars, Vinson & Elkins LLP from the National Endowment for the Arts. Art Works.
Jos de Gruyter Harald
Thys gallery,
Nairy Baghramian
“Off Broadway”
. . . & Joan Jonas
still .*
Dave Hickey
MARCI WASHINGTON In Conversation With Jarrett Earnest (Part One)
104-107
SFAQ [PROJECTS] ISSUE 19
at VOLTA NY Tom Sachs Henry Martin
(Pullout poster, for more information visit [Link]) In Conversation With John Held, Jr.
March 5-8, 2015 Amy Franceschini
108-113
Pier 90 (Pullout poster, for more information visit [Link]) Name-Dropping Stories Off The Top Of My Head
By Tom Marioni
Ulay 114-117
(Centerfold, page 64-65)
Zine Reviews
Willa Köerner By Lele Saveri
(Print page 32-33 + online) 118
Kadist Art Foundation + SFAQ
Page 16: (letter from) The Secession Sessions, a project by Eric Baudelaire.
Publisher & Editor in Chief This April marks the beginning of the 5th year of SFAQ . . . and
CAIO FONSECA
Andrew McClintock
things are about to get weird.
Managing Editor (Print and Online)
Peter Cochrane
Because we are an art magazine we’ve decided to start break-
Editors (Print and Online) ing all the rules we’ve been pretending to follow the last few
Lucy Kasofsky, Peter Dobey, and Lauren Marsden
years. We hope it confuses you, we hope you get scared, we
Editorial Assistants hope we piss some of you off, too. But we think you will be su-
Mario Ayala and Alexandra Toledo
per stoked on what we are about to do. While we don’t really
Staff Writers know what that is, we know we’re going to blow your minds.
Peter Cochrane, Peter Dobey, Jarrett Earnest, John Held, Jr., Lucy Kasofsky
Contributing Writers Equality, change, and understanding are in. Hate is out. So
Ingrid Burrington, Anthony Choice-Diaz, Dean Dempsey, Jarrett Earnest, John Held, Jr., Jessica
Hoffmann, Paul Karlstrom, Courtney Malick, Tom Marioni, Leigh Markopoulos, Pat McCarthy, is Artforum . . . that shit’s boring. I mean, who actually reads it
Nicholas O’Brien, Mark Van Proyen, John Rapko, Lele Saveri, Gianni Simone, V. Vale, Ben Valentine, these days anyway?
Jocko Weyland, John Zarobell
Online Writers Get with it. It’s amazing we can all see each other at all. So why
Lani Asher, Bianca Buillen, Cathy Fairbanks, Gladys-Katherina Hernando, Merideth Hillbrand, Kelly
Inouye, Leora Lutz, Courtney Malick, Shana Beth Mason, Ariel Rosen, Robert Strang, Sarah Thi- not do some good in the world?
bault, Johanna Thompson
This issue is dedicated to everyone that has ever lost their lives to unjust police killings
#handsupdontshoot
CONTACT
Publisher: andrewm@[Link]
Advertising: advertise@[Link]
Listings: listings@[Link]
Distribution: distribution@[Link]
SFAQ LLC
441 O’Farrell St.
San Francisco, CA, 94102, USA
[Link]
Image: The Armory Show 2015 Commissioned Artist, Lawrence Abu Hamdan, Tape Echo (detail), 2013-2014.
APRIL 30–
MAY 3, 2015
FORT MASON
FESTIVAL PAVILION
[Link]
JANUARY 30–FEBRUARY 28, 2015
M. Lamar
Mapplethorpe’s Whip
From Surveillance Punishment and the Black Psyche, Part Two, Overseer, 2014
HD video, sound, 10:29 minutes
W A LT E R A N D M c B E A N
[Link]/MLAMAR
GALLERIES
800 Chestnut Street
San Francisco, CA 94133 San Francisco Art Institute @sanfranciscoartinstitute @SFAIevents, #SFAI
David Mitchell: Boundaries
January 29–March 12, 2015
HANG ART
567 Sutter Street | Second Floor | San Francisco | CA | 94102 | 415.434.4234 | [Link]
150
Paintings,
Sculptures
and Museum of Contemporary Art // North Miami
Art Objects March 21, 2015 - July 1 2015
created by [Link]
100
Artists from
31 countries
[Link] IMAGE // Charles Linder, Ghostang, 2005 - Present // Courtesy of the Artist and Gallery 16, SF and La Casa Del Tunel, Tijuana
A PRIVATE COLLECTION AT LAKE TAHOE, NV
SCENE ONE
Historical Fictions
Mark Benson ≈
It’s about promotion & name recognition
1938
Jan. 16th - Feb. 14th, 2015
TOM MARIONI
SIA
FBI
CIA
KGB
2015
UFO In 1938 the Golden Gate Bridge was built.
In 1938 Flax Artists’ Materials opened its doors.
ART Unlike the bridge, that closed for a weekend this January,
Flax has never been closed.
And that’s our plan for the next 75 years.
EVER GOLD GALLERY // SAN FRANCISCO Work hard and advertise | [Link]
See Off the Top of My Head Born and raised in San Francisco. And here to stay.
MON–SAT 9:30am–7pm 1699 MARKET 415.552.2355
Check out the all new [Link] today
SPECULATIVE FUTURISM belief in the ability of art and design to affect future change. Creativity can empower
us with the tool of speculation—the magical ability to peer into possible alternate re-
alities using the combined forces of critical thinking and imagination. As Dunne and
Speculative Futurism is a creative critical thinking project manifesting in concise
statements of fears and hopes for the future, using the Internet as a tool to catalyze
and propel the conversation.
enlightenment created by a society in which each and every human feels supported
and embraced. In the ideal future, artists are intrinsically valued because their ability
to generate creative ideas sets them apart from machines. Greed is abolished due to
An Experimental + Collaborative Raby write, “Speculating is based on imagination, the ability to literally imagine other an abundance of clean resources. Open-source technologies help us create sustain-
worlds and alternatives.” Using what we know now, we can fly forward, creatively To set this project in motion, I invited a group of creative professionals—artists, able, shared solutions for clean energy, food, medicine, and shelter. When everyone is
SFAQ [Project] By Willa Köerner anticipating what might (or should) come to pass. writers, curators, technologists, publishers, and museum workers—to imagine two well taken care of, fights over power and control dwindle. We create a truly equitable
potential futures. In one, conditions have changed for the worse and our species and sustainable society. Humans and the world thrive.
When we think of the future, it can seem impossibly far away. Looming like a storm Working to articulate our hopes and fears for the future can be an informative and is struggling; in the other, improvements have been made and circumstances are
cloud on the horizon, it rumbles and rolls, anxiously anticipated yet only loosely pre- constructive exercise, especially if these hopes and fears work to catalyze action. generally better than they are now. The original group of participants was invited to While speculating about the future isn’t synonymous with affecting change for the
pared for. What if there was a way to reverse-engineer that daunting cloud, and de- “Probably the purest form of fictional world is the utopia . . . The idea of utopia is far conceptualize these futures in any way that felt natural based on their experienc- future, I’m hopeful that the mere act of pinning down our hopes and fears can be
cide for ourselves which type of sky we might cast overhead? more interesting when used as a stimulus to keep idealism alive, not as something to es, either through the very specific lens of their creative profession, or on a grander empowering and useful. As H.G. Wells is known to have said, “The only true measure
try to make real but as a reminder of the possibility of alternatives, as somewhere to scale that took the entire world into account. They were also invited to think of “the of success is the ratio between what we might have done and what we might have
Since H. G. Wells published Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific aim for rather than build.” According to Dunne and Raby, being idealistic about how future” in whatever way made sense to them, be it a few months from now or a hun- been on the one hand, and the thing we have made and the things we have made
Progress Upon Human Life and Thought: An Experiment in Prophecy in 1901—and we hope the future could look can help us think concretely about where we should dred years off. Either way, they would need to decide on a timeline and an approach of ourselves on the other.” When we have something to look forward to, perhaps we
probably earlier—humans have been captivated by the desire to anticipate how the be aiming and focusing our efforts in the present. In the same way, imagining the fu- to conceiving of “the future” as something concrete and imaginable rather than fun- will be more motivated to take the necessary steps towards creating a world where
world will look in the future. Emerging as a field of study in the 1960s, “future studies” ture as a derailed, calamitous dystopia can also be useful. If we ignore warning signs damentally abstract. our hopes, rather than our fears, will flourish.
is a branch of research focused on postulating on potential futures and examining and forge ahead without critiquing our existing behaviors in light of how they could
the conditions and mentalities that could affect what comes to pass. Interestingly, evolve and dismantle us, there’s little hope for us as a species. Using their imagined dystopian-ish and utopian-ish futures, each invited participant
future studies (also referred to as futurology and futurism) blurs the lines between created two tweet-sized responses articulating his or her hopes and fears about
In many cases, works of science fiction function in a speculative sense by crafting where we’re heading. As you’ll notice if you read through the nearly 50 responses
art, science, and history, coalescing in the gray area created by the nuances of the
fourth dimension, i.e., the passing of time. distinctive narratives about strange new realities that could believably come to pass. I collected (featured in this spread’s illustration), many of the collected hopes and
PARTICIPATE: How do you see the future unfolding?
The best sci-fi is haunting and thrilling because, while the plots are imaginative, we fears share similar characteristics:
I invite you to add your own HOPES and FEARS tweets to the Speculative Futurism
Futurists of the early 20th century glorified the possibilities of the future as they saw recognize the inherent behaviors and situations as familiar, as possible. While many
project by using the #SpecFuturism hashtag.
the power and speed of new technologies and scientific breakthroughs as invigo- sci-fi stories are created to be consumed as entertainment, it seems there is always We FEAR the effect that technology will have on our creativity, individuality, and over-
rating catapults capable of launching society above and apart from its glum past. To a grain of truth to what they’re depicting—think 1984, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Her, all humanity. We worry that feelings of apathy will escalate to a point where we’re help-
Visit this project online to see it unfold on Twitter at @SpecFuturism and on Tum-
them, the future was everything. By contrast, today the concept of “the future” has Black Mirror, and even The X-Files. We read and watch and we digest the strange- less to act on a number of issues, from preventing climate change to advocating for
blr at [Link].
almost become cliché. While institutions such as the Long Now Foundation (estab- ness that could come to pass. In some cases we become impervious to these po- social justice and equality. We’re afraid that capitalism may run out of control in a fu-
lished 1996), the Singularity University (founded 2008), and programs such as Cali- tential futures as the initial shock is absorbed and the horror fades to acceptance. ture society where technology has brought us further away from worldwide equality.
Thank you to the invited group of featured Speculative Futurism participants, whose
fornia College for the Arts’s new strategic foresight MBA prove that the future is still But what if we were more accustomed to using fictional stories about the future to We’re fearful of the fate of the arts, and can imagine an unfortunate future where art
HOPES and FEARS are featured in this spread’s illustration:
very much a prominent topic of study and discussion, it seems that we’re no longer catalyze actual debate? To inspire action? To change the evolution of culture? and artists become irrelevant and obsolete. We’re worried that we’re a fundamentally
quite as energized by thoughts of the future. Perhaps we have become exhausted, selfish, lazy, and wasteful species, and that our dependency on technology will cata-
A. Will Brown (@awillbrown), Alex Teplitzky (@alexteplitzky), Anna Muessig (@annabike),
accustomed to our ever-expanding dependency on technologies and acclimatized Inspired by the history of futurism and by a desire to create an antidote to our fu- lyze these characteristics in damning ways. If robots take our jobs and kill us off, we’re Annalee Newitz (@annaleen), Anthony Discenza (@anthonydiscenza), Barry Threw (@bar-
to the contemporary condition of information overload. With so much sensational- ture-focused malaise, I have initiated Speculative Futurism, an experimental project worried that it will still be our fault, too. rythrew), Bean Gilsdorf (@beangilsdorf), Ben Valentine (@bennnyv), Charles Cabbage (@
ization, there’s little left to champion. asking participants to use concrete experiences and existing knowledge to theo- ccabbage2012), Daniel Morgan (@danielmorgan), Dorothy Santos (@deedottiedot), Gregory
rize about what lies ahead. In line with past generations of future speculators, I be- On a lighter note, we have high hopes. We can imagine great possibilities unfolding: Stock (@theradiantbaby), Guinevere de la Mare (@zenguin), Jeff Tidwell (@prepop), Jillian
Recently I’ve pondered how and why we might invigorate our attempts to engineer lieve we can put creative energy to good use by asking ourselves to imagine fiction- Steinhauer (@jilnotjill), Kara Q. Smith (@karaqsmith), Keir Winesmith (@drkeir), Ken Eklund
the future, especially from a cultural perspective. Why do we feel stuck with the way al yet possible alternate futures, as these conjectures then allow us a more tangible, We HOPE that, deep down, we are benevolent creatures who will eventually work (@writerguygames), Man Bartlett (@manbartlett), Morehshin Allahyari (@morehshin), Neal
concrete opportunity to take action in building the world we hope to inhabit. out a way to use technology to solve problems rather than create them. We aspire Stimler (@nealstimler), Olof Mathé (@olofster), Paolo Salvagione (@salvagione), Rachel Craft
things are when there’s so much that could be done? In reading Anthony Dunne and (@rachcraft), Sara Thacher (@thacher), Sarah Bailey Hogarty (@sbhogarty), Sheetal Pra-
Fiona Raby’s excellent book, Speculative Everything, I have been inspired by their to bring access to quality education to everyone, and we can imagine a new era of
japati (@sdp80), Tim Belonax (@timbelonax), and Zoë Salditch (@zoesalditch).
SFAQ Issue 19 Columns
An Internet Of Wars: On Point 2.05 // The Hustle Of Language
Military Networks And Network Militarization Mark Van Proyen, 46-47
Ingrid Burrington, 36-39
The tale of how dudes making idiots of themselves on Jackass (and laughing all the
Maps and grids unfurl in the mind when attempting to visualize the Internet—the way to the bank) made its impact on performance art might go something like this:
wires that run through tubes underground and undersea and the snaking pathways “I mean, if Chris Burden can get famous by having a guy shoot him in a gallery, then I
from great service hubs dotted around the globe into the walls of our homes. But should be able to get famous by falling off of my skateboard over a bed of hot coals,
our Internet may be very different from their Internet: the streams of data running right?” Theatricality? Absurdist cabaret? The physical incarnation of language?
between governmental bodies and private contractors. What are the implications Using examples set by Michael Peppe and the work of the Muistardeaux Collec-
when one of these service providers, contracted by a military organization, is com- tive, Van Proyen looks at opposing uses of language-as-performance through hy-
plicit in the very real warfare that exists at the long arms of these networks? A distinc- per-constructed, timed, physical and vocal movements and the chaos that ensues
tion can no longer be made between the physical world and the one created by the from manic free association (read: social media). Choreography and spontaneity
Internet. How do we negotiate our involvement in the network of perpetual warfare? may have merged in this age of hyperactivity and the performative state of language
will continually evolve.
WeChat
Ben Valentine, 40-41 Three Perspectives On The Globalization Of The Art Market
John Zarobell, 48-49
Traveling through Asia, Ben Valentine found nearly every person he spoke with
using the Internet in ways the Western world has not much considered. Touted in One word will be etched as the epitaph for the 20th century: “globalization.” Some will
the West as a restrictive and oppressive space throttled by the chokehold of a com- sing its praise and some will denounce it as the keystone for the death of the living
munist government, social media in China has boomed through the use of WeChat. wage, local labor, and the epitome of capitalist greed. As the art world rests on the
Released in 2011, WeChat now boasts over 1.1 billion registered accounts with an shoulders of big business and big money—now inextricably tied to the web of com-
average of 65% of Chinese Internet users communicating through WeChat. An es- merce known as globalization—what aspects of the art market can be considered
timated 3 billion webpages are shared every day, apps and businesses are created good, bad, or ineffable? Who has profited from the meteoric expansion of the mar-
specifically for and within the program, and Tencent’s net profit (the parent company ket? Where would we be without the nearly 200 annual art fairs and 150 biennials
of WeChat) clocked in at 3.7 billion yuan (604 million dollars) in 2014. But governmen- that dot every country on the planet? Whether the status quo is or isn’t working for
tal censorship is still strict: political wordplay has recently been banned, real-name an arts economy, what are artist doing to envision actionable alternatives?
policies akin to Facebook’s have been instated, and any language against the gov-
ernment is strictly forbidden. Are social connections through codified messages Journeys From And To A Destination Nation
merely shouting into the void or building an affirming ecosystem of individuality? Anthony Choice-Diaz, 50-52
Where Is The Risk In Digital Art? Continuing his previous column The Hidden Story In The U.S. Immigration Debate
Nicholas O’Brien, 42-43 found in SFAQ 18, Anthony Choice-Diaz unearths the historical and contemporary
involvement of the United States in the brutality of Latin American wars, puppet gov-
“A work or product that is confronting something contentious in society or culture ernments, and the institutionalized barriers preventing immigration. As the United
can often be considered a risky endeavor for an artist at any level of their career.” States was founded on the principles of Manifest Destiny—that the expansion and
Nicholas O’Brien begins his column on the risks of making art in an economic sys- domination of the country was both inevitable and justified—total conquest took
tem has proven hostile to artists with a career-destroying maxim. Is new abstract 19th-century armies west and south to claim massive swaths of Mexican land by
painting flying off of gallery walls and creating record sales simply because it’s safe? force. For a country forged by the domination of other peoples, it appears a trajec-
As the National Endowment for the Arts revoked individualized funding due to mul- tory of war was laid with its foundation. “Today, some would argue, based upon the
tiple controversies from artists such as Andres Serrano and Robert Mapplethorpe, masses in the streets protesting against the flagrant police murders of the nation’s
general institutional funding has by and large become devastatingly competitive Black population, that things haven’t changed all that much since 1864. I don’t pose
and safe. Even the international superstar Marina Abramović recently turned to this notion here flippantly: to understand the contemporary immigration drama one
Kickstarter to fund her institute for art. Are crowd-funding and venture capital—hot must understand that perpetual war is a central pillar of U.S. foreign policy, which has
words in the start-up tech economy—methods of funding that should apply towards created a de facto refugee crisis continent wide.”
the creation of digital art? Without risk we shift lazily and laterally but never grow.
Your Gaze Hits The Side
Eco-Poetics And The Visual Art Of John Cage Jessica Hoffmann, 53-55
John Rapko, 44-45 Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, by way of Beyoncé’s 2014 mega-hit ***Flawless, cut
through the polarized sexes like a hot knife through butter. After Beyoncé tells
During his time lecturing at the Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Colombia, John
us that she’s not “just his little wife” (and to “bow down bitches, bow, bow down
Rapko made penetrating inquiries attempting to understand contemporary art.
bitches”) and before repeating that what-the-fuck-ever she and all women are
These public conversations were collected and recorded into the 2009 book Logro,
Fracaso, Aspiración: Tres Intentos de Entender el Arte Contemporáneo (Achieve- doing is flawless, Adichie ends her 1:24-long spoken clip by defining the most
ment, Failure, Aspiration: Three Attempts to Understand Contemporary Art). Using contentious word to divide contemporary society: “Feminist: the person who
the dogmatism John Cage applied to his sonic masterpieces as a lens to access believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.” This is a sim-
and unravel the prints he made for over 20 years at Crown Point Press in San Fran- ple notion. It is an elegant notion. It is firm and decisive and begs that we stand
cisco, Rapko seeks to understand the aspirations of contemporary artists that move together. It asks that you please sit down, shut up, and listen to those who have
them to create, to fail, and to push forward. In his words: “Without an appreciation been and are being marginalized, because inequality is insidious and mercurial. In
of not just Cage’s aims, but also of the motivations for those aims, it would be even 1982 NY MoMA exhibited a retrospective of Louise Bourgeois’s works marking
more difficult to understand why Déreau failed—that is, failed artistically as a satisfy- the first time a woman was permitted such recognition. In 2014 HOWDOYOU-
ing expression of an eco-poetics . . . [t]he value of folding in is honored, but not every- SAYYAMINAFRICAN? pulled their work from the Whitney Biennial “in protest of
thing is ready just yet to be used in some other configuration.” the inclusion of Joe Scanlan’s Donelle Woolford project, which centers around a
fictional black woman artist imagined by Scanlan, a white man.” Tracing the ways
in which art has relied on the existence of a normative center, Jessica Hoffmann
considers 12 ways that women artists continue to exist as “the other.”
36 [SFAQ Issue 19] Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA). [Link] Courtesy of the Internet.
As more and more police departments rush to equip logging all cell phone data. Assuming the best of Wilson I was shocked at the number of actions that
their officers with body cameras, I think about that law enforcement, those other phones captured by had been happening simultaneously to the march I’d
DISA quote from 2006. The leading proprietor of cop a Stingray are collateral damage. Increasingly, it ap- attended.
body cameras in the United States right now is Tas- pears that they’re being used explicitly for dragnet
er, the company that manufactures the stun guns of surveillance in contexts like mass protests. Being This is where I continue to find hope in the face of an
the same name. When it actually comes to business within the reach of an IMSI catcher becomes enough increasingly militarized Internet—in localized models,
models, Taser’s camera setup is kind of brilliant. Cam- pretext for surveillance. Network-centric policing not in the contingency of emergent systems. The way in
eras are fairly cheap to manufacture and likely to get only militarizes network space, it also reinforces the which activists build and use networks is largely in op-
cheaper, but data storage needs will only metasta- militarization of physical space—and, returning to position to the hyper-centralized, panoptic model of
size. Taser isn’t actually selling cameras so much as Appelbaum’s quote, demonstrates the fallacy of as- network-centric warfare. Part of this is simply a mat-
they’re selling cloud storage for camera data and suming there’s a clear distinction between the two. ter of scale. In the face of an increased militarization,
a platform for accessing that data, rendering what policing, and weaponization of networked space, the
might be commonly seen as an ethical or cultural There is no separation between the real world and act of building an entirely separate, global parallel
problem (i.e., police accountability) into a data stor- the Internet, and there never has been. As the false network requires an act of secession—not merely
age problem, a network infrastructure problem. boundaries between those spaces blur, similarly in a figurative John Perry Barlow sense, but a heavy,
imagined boundaries between state and corporate physical, infrastructural one whose borders, frankly,
Another increasingly popular instrument of net- interests, between infrastructure and weapons sys- will never be legitimized. We can’t just build a “new In-
work-centric policing is not itself infrastructure but tems also reveal themselves to be fictitious. To some ternet” or demand a return to an early 1990s Internet
the impersonation of it. Stingrays, a surveillance tool extent, the emergence of network-centric warfare that never was any more than we can wash our hands
manufactured by military contractor Harris Corpora- and network-centric policing reflects a general shift of or return to a United States of America that’s not in-
tion, capture unique data about cell phones by setting toward a network-centric everything. And to an ex- extricably tied to structural racism. But we can carve
up a fake cell tower that phones connect to while tent, both military and police are correct to perceive out pockets of opposition and contingency within the
searching for a signal. Combined with other technol- the network as a potential existential threat to their networks we have. To conceive of a future beyond a
ogies (also manufactured and sold by Harris), Sting- methods—not only because that’s how they’re us- militarized network, one must remain illegible to it.
rays can be used to eavesdrop on conversations ing networks, but also because networks are being
and text messages. Disclosure about police use of used to circumvent them. One of the reasons that re-
Stingrays has been limited and efforts by groups like cent protests against police violence in cities across
the ACLU to find out more about their use have hit America have so successfully shut down cities
a number of legal roadblocks. Although technically (blockading traffic, interrupting sporting events, dis-
Stingrays are supposedly used in the service of try- rupting shopping centers) is that they have been well
ing to capture and intercept individuals’ communica- networked yet still thoroughly decentralized. March
tions, the devices aren’t designed to capture a single routes are contingent, communicated mostly in the
target—they’re IMSI (International Mobile Subscrib- moment. Every evening I returned home from one of 1) [Link]
er Identity) catchers, indiscriminately accepting and the protests following the non-indictment of Darren baum-utopia-interview
{This page] Slides from PDF presentation by Network Intergrity Systems, Inc. and
Communications Supply Corporation. Courtesy of the Internet.
Computer Weekly, Drone Kill Communications Net Illustrated, [Link] Courtesy of the Internet.
38 [SFAQ Issue 19] 39 [SFAQ Issue 19]
WeChat
Ben Valentine
I’m sitting alone in a crowded station waiting to board
my next train to carry me across the border from
Southern China into Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam.
Curious about the sole foreigner in the station, and
wanting to practice her English, the young woman
next to me strikes up a conversation. Before long, it’s
time for me to board and for us to part ways.
Mark Van Proyen bespeaks the somewhat romantic idea that there is
some special importance to the way that we under-
only partially successful, simply because the task of
pinpointing the real to which realism aspired to realis-
leading up to the zombie plague that now calls itself
contemporary art. My day-trading friends call this pe-
typefaces to indicate his cast of close to a hundred in-
trasubjective characters, facilitating the performative
everyday experience of depthless content running
horribly awry. One might detect a similar, hyper-so-
stand the body-as-object as opposed to how we tically represent was and no doubt still is impossible. culiar phenomenon “a crowded trade,” which is one channeling of them as one might channel surf a late phisticated congeniality in the novels of David Foster
Performance art is getting some attention as of late, understand the body-as-vessel-for-the-subject, and That impossibility may in fact be the only “reality” that of their code words that means “sell everything now.” night television menu of pathetic possibility. Wallace—a congeniality that is laced with a canny
but maybe not the kind of attention that it needs. it reaches back to the idea of performance art evolv- something purporting to be “realistic” might aspire to. understanding of theory and philosophy, locating
What it is getting is a lot of rah rah chatty chat, and ing out of sculpture—think of the work of the Vienna But I digress. The happy news is that the 20th century Peppe’s most ambitious performance project was a practical applications of both in an absurd and giddy
what it is not getting is the kind of historically informed Action Group, Fluxist concerts, or the early works Literary scholars tend to work with one definition of has given us a rich tradition of performative language work from 1984–85 titled Actmusikspectakle V, which moment of post-historical consciousness that still
analysis that might challenge it to move in a direction created by the San Francisco Dancers’ Workshop realism, while art historians work with several. The projects that work both with and against techno-bu- took Peppe close to an hour to perform. The effect longs for a lost historical authority. When this longing
of real risk and real accomplishment. This is especial- under the direction of Anna Halprin. From the vantage former see realism as having to do with an unvar- reaucratic consolidation, ranging from symbolist po- produced by the work was both exhilarating and adopts its more self-infatuated guise, we get some-
ly important because of the ephemeral nature of the of the first generation of performance artists, theatri- nished view of the sheer topicality of contemporary etry to surrealist language games to deconstructive spellbinding, seeming as if half a dozen lunatics had thing that looks very much like a TED talk that ex-
beast, which lives and then disappears into a haze of cality was the enemy (even as they created a kind of life somehow separated from any metaphysical ide- textual analysis; this lineage also includes things such taken over the performer’s personality to compete for horts its listeners to the banal trough of undeserved
documentation, commentary and reliquary memora- art world theater out of their avoidance of theatrical- alism shrouded in history, presumably leading to a as Charles Olsen’s Theory of Projective Verse and the right to stylize a prolonged epileptic seizure. De- self-esteem. When it falls into hands of master iro-
bilia. In recent years, these things have grown expo- ity) because, in that early era of mass-mediatization, clearer view of the linkage between material relations the chidings of vernacular street poetry. It is always spite the length of the performance, it was flawlessly nists like Muistardeaux, we see the landscape of dis-
nentially hazier because of the sheer deluge of such bodies-in-space started to take on their own uncan- and ideology. There is less of a consensus amongst worth remembering that the one thing that we always executed in a state of breakneck velocity, suggesting course for what it is: a heap of distractions that reveal
material on YouTube, where it is impossible not to ny dimension. art historians on this point, and when it falls into the ask from the artistic imagination is the evocation of the possibility that the early Futurist Sestini might their sad truths through laying bare the strategies of
look like you are doing some kind of performance art, hands of art critics such as myself, riots and sheer a world somehow different from the everyday world have influenced Peppe’s thoughts about language intentionally failed concealment. It is like a radical re-
however unfortunate such a look might be. But by the end of the 1970s, theatricality was no lon- chaos ensue. For art historians, the point of distinc- that we inhabit. It is always best to make lemonade and performance. Indeed, language as subject, top- versal of the Freudian idea of parapraxis (“Freudian
ger seen in such a negative light, because by that tion tends to see realism in contrast to naturalism, but when we are pelted with lemons, and we always can ic, and instrument at the core of Actmusikspectakle slips”), which turn out to be every bit as revealing (and
And if this was not bad enough, we have the related time, even performance art could be easily docu- even here there is still a lot of definitional dissonance, point out how this has been accomplished in the past. V, in many ways the work was about how a broadly a bit more frightening) than their opposite numbers.
phenomena of Jackass. I heard somewhere that it mented and exchanged (originally by way of cheaply because naturalism itself is a term that is also very But we can also point to the work of artists in the pres- defined notion of speech-act could repeatedly fold
started as a skit in a Toy Machine skateboarding vid- produced and distributed VHS tapes, forcing perfor- hard to pin down. ent who do this by performing spell-binding works back upon those aspects and then out again in the It seems that the “reality effect” that Barthes wrote
eo, but I only know the movies featuring antics and mance art back to its Futurist, Dadist, and Surrealist that interrogate the fungible materiality of language manner of a necktie knot. For example, in one part of about almost fifty years ago has been turned upside
shenanigans played out as a kind of frat boy blood roots as absurdist cabaret). That moment (and nearly But the effort continued to be made, over and over, in uniquely imaginative ways that are all true to the it called Information Whiteout, the phrase “why what is down and inside out, and those turns may in fact be
sport. These things start to loom large in the popular the twenty years that followed) was well document- and language had to be perpetually reformulated to performative disassociation that is built into language is why what is is,” folds in and out of the work’s deluge the only things that we have left to us that can still be
imagination, and in so doing they foreclose the other ed in the pages of High Performance Magazine, a make good on this quest. Witness the primary role itself. of elaborate gesticulation and vocalization, vividly trusted as the kind of “reality” that something pur-
ways in which we might think of performance art as a southern California-based journal that was edited by that language-as-language plays in such diverse in- dramatizing the collapse of faith between linguistic porting to be “realistic” might use as a touchstone. Of
historical continuum of artistic activities moving from Linda Frye Burnham between 1978 and 1997. From a tellectual enterprises as Lacanian psychoanalysis Two vivid examples come to mind, both more-or- references and those things to which they might refer. course, this may have been the subtle point of Bar-
past to present. In this regard, performance art shares re-reading of its pages, it became clear that the work or analytic philosophy. As Ludwig Wittgenstein fa- less based in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first of thes’s essay, and I cannot help but noting that it orig-
something with abstract painting; In both cases, artis- of the second generation performance art evolved mously wrote at the conclusion of his Tractatus-Log- these is the work of Michael Peppe, who presented The second example that I want to call attention to is inally appeared at the same time as Jack Burnham’s
tic accomplishment is understood in relation to how from and into a great many things, and language, or to ico-Philosophicus, “What cannot be spoken of must performance works in an idiom that he called Behav- the work of the Muistardeaux Collective, that being a book Beyond Modern Sculpture (1969). Along with
any given work self-consciously positions itself in re- be more precise, the materiality of language is one of be passed over in silence,” thereby emphasizing the iormusik throughout the 1980s and early 1990s (note collaborative group comprised of Tom Borden, Eric Lawrence Alloway, Burnham was the most forward
lation to the known history of its respective subgenre, those things, and over time it may have become the point of privilege to be conferred to what J. L. Aus- here that the Germanic “k” at the end of Behavior- Gibbons, and the fictitious Khyssup Muistardeaux thinking art critic of his time, and in the aforemen-
and the tropes and idioms that are associated with most important of those things. tin has called “the constitutive” aspect of language, musik is a nod to the work of the German avant-garde who is occasionally played by an actor. The Muis- tioned book, he concludes with a prophetic medita-
it. The Jackass phenomenon seeks to erase these which is where “truth-value” was supposed to reside. composer Karlheinz Stockhausen, who much later tardeaux Collective has engaged a vast variety of tion on the way that networks will have to become
kinds of positionings by resorting to acts that appear And so, my title: The Hustle of Language. It is a pun, However, this emphasis on truth-value was only im- became globally famous for proclaiming the 9/11 ter- media, and have released over a dozen recorded al- understandable as objects, something that rings
as gestures of sheer audacity. “I mean, if Chris Bur- no doubt a bad one. It alludes to a 1986 book by portant because it invited corroboration and verifica- rorist attacks as “the greatest work of art that exists bums from since 2007. Indeed, they do perform mu- even more true today than it did 45 years ago. The
den can get famous by having a guy shoot him in a Roland Barthes titled The Rustle of Language (Le tion, and those things are oftentimes moored in the for the whole Cosmos.”) At this point in time, Peppe sic, and in a manner similar to Peppe’s work, they do performance artists whose work I have called atten-
gallery, then I should be able to get famous by falling Bruissement de Langue), that being a collection of 45 shifting sands of epistemology rather than the hard may well be better known as the author of two essays incorporate music into their performances, but these tion to here differ greatly, but what they both have in
off of my skateboard over a bed of hot coals, right?” for-the most-part short, “occasional” essays written granite of physical science. Austin himself seemed that were originally published in High Performance performances often tend to be much more about the common is the recognition that getting to the truth of
Once again, subtlety and sophistication lose out, and between 1967 and 1980. One of the earliest and most aware of this, so he also articulated the countervail- Magazine, the first titled “Why Performance Art is So radical unscripting of language than its hyper-orga- the moment means fleeing from what it is supposed
bozohood reigns supreme, or almost so. To provide well known of the essays contained in this volume ing claim on behalf of four “performative” aspects of Bad” (1982), and the second “Why Our Art is So Bad” nized opposite. A typical Muistardeaux performance to be, and in so doing they transform language from
a counter-narrative to the recent Jackassification was titled The Reality Effect (1968), and even though language that he called the explicit, implicit, primi- (1983).1 features Borden and Gibbons standing next to each an instrument of communication to the state of being
of performance art, I am here offering an abridged it harks back to a structuralist mode of analysis that tive, and inexplicit. None of these aspects gestured other in front of an audience, launching into an ami- an objectified network of possibilities seeking actual-
version of a conference paper that I presented back has fallen out of favor in our post-post-structuralist toward what he called “truth-value claiming,” but in- Both essays are masterpieces of rhapsodic invective, able and chatty conversation that harks back to ization.
in April (2014). The theme of the conference was Au- moment, it still bears a belated re-reading amid the stead seek to leverage and elaborate on ambiguity hilarious and insightful in equal measure, and both are 1960s comedy duos such as Rowan and Martin or
thorship, Citation, and Collaboration in Contemporary newer context of the ways that technology has af- and paradox, thereby evading, stalling, and perhaps world-class examples of career suicide taken to the- the Smothers Brothers. But in a few short minutes,
Bay Area Performance, and I chose to take it literally fected art and indeed, all communication during the even undermining the consolidating imperatives of atrical extreme. No one bothered to rebut the essay’s these conversations start to run awry and off of the
by focusing my remarks on the work of some San past four decades—scratch that, for the past 14 de- constitutive language practices. Left unchallenged, many fine points in the open court of public debate, rails, verging into outright manias of free association
Francisco Bay Area-based performance artists who cades. Barthes’s self-assigned task was to account constitutive language practices will always default but suddenly doors started slamming in his face be- delivered in a state of fevered one-upmanship. They
make uncanny use of language as the primary mate- for the role that descriptive ornamentation played in to the safe shores of the bureaucratic and the pseu- cause one of the targets of Peppe’s grandiloquent call these performances Tikalba and link the term to
rial of their work. relationship to literary texts that purport to participate do-scientific: in short, to the mechanical translation of literary wrath was the shabby influence-peddling the idea of an exposition about a topic based on very
in something called realism. The essay struggled with precedent into policy. that, in those days, operated as “public arts funding,” little knowledge about it—a comic mimic of what
Authorship, citation, and collaboration: these struck its topic, and it never really got to the point of articu- which in Peppe’s view was nothing more than a scam happens in that surrealist gesamtkunstwerk that we
me as a set of deviant terms, insofar as they run lating how some kinds of descriptive specification Enter technology. Just as maritime colonialism of mutual self-entitlement enacted by those who had call “social media.” 1) The essay was reprinted several times. See Michael
counter to the dominant cliché of West Coast per- contribute to the creation of a realistic effect, while radically expanded the horizons of 17th-century art “friends on grant committees.” When I first met Peppe Peppe, “Why Our Art is So Bad,” in Sumner, Burch and
formance art being about isolated non-verbal bodies others were said to gratuitously distract the reader beyond what could be shoehorned into a perspec- many years ago, his reputation had preceded him, Sumner (eds.), The Guests Go Into Supper (Oakland, Burn-
gesticulating in para-allegorical spaces. This cliché from it. For this and other reasons, the essay was tival picture plane, so too did the many leapfrogging and I asked, “Are you the guy who destroyed perfor- ing Books, 1986). 342-361.
mance art?” His answer spoke volumes: “I wish.”
46 [SFAQ Issue 19] 47 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Three Perspectives On The Globalization Of The Art Market
Anthony Choice-Diaz
(Part Two)
On November 20th, 2014, Barack Obama, the 44th
President of the United States, gave what was tout-
ed as his long overdue speech on immigration. In
the typical myth-making of a master rhetorician, the
president sought to create an image of a pro-im-
migration nation at the expense of fact. Beginning
his speech by espousing a supposed 200-year-old
tradition of “welcoming immigrants from around the
world,” Obama sought to reframe the discussion just
in time for an all-American family chitchat over the na-
tion’s Thanksgiving meal. But as was explained in part
one of this column, U.S. policy has been anything but
welcoming. It has been highly selective, prejudicial,
and used as a mechanism of empire-building both
at home and abroad. It has to be understood that the
U.S. was and is a settler-colonial nation built upon the
displacement and murder of the continent’s indige-
Children caught in the middle of the immigration crisis. Courtesy of the Internet. An El-Salvadorian prison gang. Courtesy of the Internet.
nous population through famine, pestilence, slavery,
and war. Manifest Destiny found its underlying foun- emerge, heads of state are overthrown or die in vio- By 1986 these “definitive” elaborations had grown Forces, Black Carib trackers, and two teams from
dations in an ever-expanding war policies and legal lent ‘accidents.’ And if by chance the jackals fail, as even more murky and all-encompassing: [his] Delta Force troop’ that trapped the guerrillas
slavery. Army Col. Guy A. LeMire(left), Marine Gen. John F. Kelly (center) and Army Col. Thomas D. Boccardi (right) inspect soldiers in formation they failed in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the old mod- atop a jungle mountain. The CIA had pushed hard
during the change of command ceremony at Soto Cano Air Base, Honduras, June 20, 2013. Courtesy of the Internet. els resurface. When the jackals fail, young Americans “Low-intensity conflict is not an operation or an activ- for the infiltrators to be killed, explicitly the guerrilla
Today, some would argue, based upon the masses are sent in to kill and to die . . . [I]f the jackal fails, then ity that one or more of the departments of the United leader . . . [Haney] dropped him with a rifle bullet to the
in the streets protesting against the flagrant police the job falls to the military.” States government can conduct. Rather, it is, first, an neck. As the U.S. operators finished off the work and
murders of the nation’s Black population, that things environment in which conflict occurs and, second, rolled over that still-warm body, they recognized the
haven’t changed all that much since 1864. I don’t pose The example of organized crime seems to offer a a series of diverse civil-military activities and opera- dead man as Arturo Baez Cruz of [the] United States
famed Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler “Contras,” paid counter revolutionaries funded by the
this notion here flippantly: to understand the contem- metaphor. Mafia bosses often start out as street tions which are conducted in that environment. While Special Forces, Haney’s roommate at Delta Force
deemed his tenure during this period accordingly as exchange of arms, drugs, and money—all of which
porary immigration drama one must understand that thugs. But over time, the ones who make it to the top low-intensity conflict may be ambiguous, the specific selection only four years earlier. The idiocy remains
he later titled his book War is a Racket: were conveniently facilitated and enabled by the U.S.
perpetual war is a central pillar of U.S. foreign policy, transform their appearance. They take to wearing activities are not. Despite their diversity, these ac- unexplained . . . as Haney concludes, yet another CIA
Central Intelligence Agency and its regional proxies.
which has created a de facto refugee crisis continent impeccably tailored suits, owning legitimate busi- tivities, which fall outside the realm of conventional scheme gone awry.”
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military Low-intensity warfare, however, wasn’t the only game
wide. nesses, and wrapping themselves in the cloak of conflict, share significant commonalities in their op-
service and during that period I spent most of my time in town. As popular activist author Arundhati Roy
as a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall once put it, “these days politics is just as easily done upstanding society. They support local charities and erational environment,” from the final report Army-Air Chomsky puts to us the architecture of why “we,” the
U.S interventionism has been a part of wartime through the checkbook as it is the cruise missile.”1 Or are respected by their communities. They are quick Force Joint Low-Intensity Conflict Project. U.S., are there in the first place:
Street, and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a
posturing throughout the American hemisphere better yet, the con job. to lend money to those in desperate straits. Like the
gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and
from gunboat diplomacy to banana republics of the John Perkins resume, these men appear to be mod- Which is to say, in short, We don’t exactly know what “[I]n Latin America . . . there are very good reasons for
especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in
1800s—a response to a period in which independent el citizens. However, beneath this patina is a trail of we’re doing, but we’re doing it anyway, and because we it. The commitment to these doctrines is inconsis-
1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place Cronyism and clientelism, put into motion by the eco-
democratic republics arose throughout the region. blood. When the debtors cannot pay, hit men move in don’t know what we’re doing, we’re doing everything, tent with the use of harsh measures to maintain the
for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues nomic hitmen of American corporations, created po-
This informal disposition on the use of American mili- to demand their pound of flesh. If this is not granted, but because we don’t know what we’re doing, we’re disparity, to ensure our control . . . and our exploitation
in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central Amer- litical dynamics in which the banana republic became
tary power/force abroad was best encapsulated and the jackals close in with baseball bats. Finally, as a last not going to tell you what we’re doing. Therefore, you of the world. In short, [to insure] what we might call
ican republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped an all-too-active monster on steroids, a junkie fueled
typified in policy form as the Monroe Doctrine (1823). resort, out come the guns. should just trust that we know what we’re doing. The the ‘fifth freedom’: the freedom to rob. That’s really
purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House by structural adjustment programs, maquiladoras,
This was a standing document that made U.S. inter- only problem with these scenarios is that real people the only one that counts; the others were mostly for
of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the no-bid contracts, sweetheart deals, corruption,
vention mandatory should any foreign or sovereign EHMs, jackals, and armies flourish for as long as have to deal with the consequences, and though this show. And in order to maintain the freedom to rob and
Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests bribery, and graft. Violence under these conditions
power tinker and dawdle within the Latin American their activities can be shown to generate economic may seem far from the immigration debate, the two exploit, we do have to consistently oppose democ-
in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the Ameri- becomes a blunted and messy tool that more often
hemisphere, the doctrine legalized war and indem- growth—and they almost always demonstrate such are directly related. So when two scholars as far afield ratization, the raising of living standards, and human
can fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped than not interferes with the ability to keep the dollars
nified U.S. aggression against any form of petulant growth. Thanks to the biased ‘sciences’ of forecast- as Noam Chomsky, one of America’s premier public rights. And we do consistently oppose them; that, of
see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolest- flowing smoothly. Seemingly, the goals of low-inten-
autonomy should sovereign nations try and seek in- ing, econometrics, and statistics, if you bomb a city intellectuals and “the most cited living author” (1992) course, is in the real world.
ed. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone sity warfare (destabilization) and structural readjust-
dependence, liberty, or self-determination anywhere and then re-build it, the data shows a huge spike in on the planet, and the Georgetown University Profes-
a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his ment (stabilization) would seem not only at odds with
on the continent. economic growth . . . The real story is that we are living sor in Foreign Policy and Director of the (U.S.) Army
racket in three districts. I operated on three conti- one another but counterintuitive. Here is where John [O]ne of the main concerns of U.S. policy is the ‘pro-
nents.” Perkins, self-confessed whistleblower on the role of a lie.”2 Historical Foundation, Derek Leebaert align, we need tection of our raw materials.’ Who must we protect
By 1848, half of Mexico had been conquered and economic hitmen, becomes that much more cogent: to be paying attention. Leebaert anecdotally relates our materials from? Well, primarily, the domestic pop-
claimed through open conquest, diplomatic duplici- Low-intensity warfare, more often than not referred the following in his To Dare and to Conquer: Special ulations, the indigenous population, which may have
This may seem disconnected from a present in which
ty, and clandestine military operations into sovereign to simply as “conflict,” today’s insurgency/counter Operations and the Destiny of Nations, from Achilles ideas of their own about raising the living standards,
news stories about half-starved, abandoned children “Economic hit men (EHMs) are highly paid profes-
territory in which American citizens were the “illegals” insurgency, began its journey to formalization in the to Al Qaeda (2006): democratization, and human rights.
and raped/brutalized women show up at the bor- sionals who cheat countries around the globe out of
taking up space and expropriating land from the local late ‘70s, and early ‘80s, following the lessons learned
ders in need of saving by the Red, White, and Blue, trillions of dollars. They funnel money from the World
population. Or perhaps it was the adventurist foreign in Vietnam. In 1985, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff au- “In El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, howev-
but these children are children of broken revolutions Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development The people who are committed to these dangerous
excursions at the cusp of the new century and the thored the following definition: er, it was most of all a case of back the bad against
and a doctrine of U.S. experimentation in low-inten- (USAID), and other foreign ‘aid’ organizations into heresies, such as using their resources for their own
Spanish-American War that solidified the imperialist the worse . . . serving as a sour metaphor for the arc
sity warfare throughout the continent. If it wasn’t a the coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of purposes or believing that the government is commit-
ambitions of a nation trying to become a global su- of U.S. third world involvements . . . Green Beret and
CIA-led Operation Condor or PBSUCCESS (1954) a few wealthy families who control the planet’s natu- “Low-intensity conflict is a limited politico-military ted to the welfare of its own people, may not be [part
perpower. In short order, major military operations Delta commandos were offering counterinsurgency
to overthrow democratically elected presidents, it ral resources. Their tools include fraudulent financial struggle to achieve political, social, economic, or psy- of a ‘monolithic and ruthless conspiracy’ by the ‘ene-
resulted in the U.S. claim over Puerto Rico, Cuba, training to regimes unsurpassed in the noncommu-
was assassinations and the disappearing of key pop- reports, rigged elections, payoffs, extortion, sex, and chological objectives. It is often protracted and rang- mies of freedom’] to begin with and, in fact, quite regu-
Guam, and the Philippines to name but a few. This nist world at slaughtering peasants . . . In that terrible
ular movement leaders such as Archbishop Óscar murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one es from diplomatic, economic, and psycho-social larly are not. In Latin America they are often members
laid the foundations for the so-called Banana Wars morass, it fit . . . Washington, during early 1983, to as-
Romero (1980), the use and sponsorship of both that has taken on new and terrifying dimensions . . . pressures through terrorism and insurgency. Low-in- . . . of Bible study groups . . . self-help groups, of church
(1898-1934) that additionally took U.S. military inter- sign a Delta-led mission to hunt down≈ and erase a
private and state-sanctioned terrorism, false flag [I]f we fail, an even more sinister breed steps in, ones tensity conflict is generally confined to a geographic organizations, peasant organizations, and so on and
ventionism into Panama, Honduras, Haiti, Domini- particular, newly formed guerrilla unit that had slipped
operations, pseudo gangs, and paramilitary death we EHMs refer to as the jackals, men who trace their area and is often characterized by constraints on the so forth. But by the time we get through with them
can Republic, Nicaragua, and Mexico at the behest across the Honduran border from Sandinista-dom-
squads like Mano Blanca (Guatemala), Sombra Ne- heritage directly to those earlier empires. The jackals weaponry, tactics, and level of violence” [emphasis they will be . . . they will have nowhere else to turn for
of U.S. corporate monopolies over an agribusiness inated Nicaragua. Command Sergeant Major Eric
gra (El Salvador), Battalion 3-16 (Honduras), or the are always there, lurking in the shadows. When they mine]. any minimal form of protection against the terror and
kept afloat through real or virtual slave labor. The Haney [headed] ‘a mixed unit of Honduran Special the violence that we regularly unleash against them if
50 [SFAQ Issue 19] 51 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Your Gaze Hits The Side
Jessica Hoffmann
1.
John Rapko
The painting shows a cottage, every window brightly lit from an otherwise unde-
picted interior. Smoke curls from the chimney. A storm runs by, roughly paralleled
by an irregular path. The cottage is set near a grove of an oddly mixed species of
trees. The path disappears into the trees, and beyond them mountains, only lightly
barely indistinct from atmospheric perspective, fill in some of the canvas. All beings
may safely graze. Any student of art history can recite precedents from among the
masters of pre-twentieth-century European painting for every aspect of the com-
position, handling, and contents of the picture. The technical ability displayed here
forces the word “competent” to one’s lips. How can such a work induce any strong
response, indeed the universal scorn of the art world?
Nearly 50 years ago the anthropologist Mary Douglas argued that a culture can
be fruitfully studied by considering how it polices its boundaries. At the edge of a
culture stands an indeterminately vast array of monsters: the beings who embody
what we don’t do, don’t say, don’t eat, or don’t touch. Monsters at the boundaries
arouse disgust in those within the culture. One of Douglas’s distinctive claims is that
a monster is something that exhibits a cognitive dissonance, in that the monsters Thomas Kinkade, Cobblestone Village, 1998. Courtesy of the Internet.
seem simultaneously to exemplify for a culture categories that ought to be kept
separate. Douglas’s most spectacular analysis illuminates the system of classifica- the days of modernism when Oscar Wilde lambasted sentimentality as trafficking in
tions that underlie the seemingly arbitrary catalog of abominations in Leviticus; for unearned affect, and Hermann Broch and Clement Greenberg treated the latter as
example, the snake is an abomination because that which is on land should walk on the mark of ersatz and cliché-ridden cultural products. It is with these abominations
legs, not crawl or slither, which are the characteristics of the beasts of the sea. that the monster Kinkade is kept outside the gates, and simultaneously the senti-
mental and the kitschy provide what little there is in contemporary art as consensual
Besides illuminating something of the classificatory structure of a society, the con- marks of failure.
sideration of monsters reveals something about the society’s relative willingness
or resistance to re-structuring itself by its attitude towards cognitive dissonance. A further and less secure part of the social myth of Kinkade is that he was Ameri-
Douglas extends this kind of analysis into modern institutions, such as the army, ca’s “most controversial” artist. One is supposed to think that Kinkade’s work is the
which are partially characterized by the degree of internal structuring, hierarchy, very icon of the yearning masses, hungry for beauty, meaning, and solace, and that
and relative porosity of their boundaries. As Douglas later summarized the analy- the power of this work presents a challenge to art world orthodoxy. Now the fact, if
ses, “each tribe actively construes its particular universe in the course of an internal it is one, that many people have bought and adore Kinkade’s products (not just or Thomas Kinkade, Walk of Faith, 2011. Courtesy of the Internet.
dialogue about law and order.”1 even primarily paintings, but prints, and then endless products festooned with the
images or Kinkade’s name: the expected gewgaws, plates, and teapots, but also of the face of Jesus and painted it in His guise as Man of Peace. The resultant work sublime mode to block the viewer’s imagined physical access to the far planes; the
On first thought the art world might not seem amenable to such an approach. Even paddles and watches) might be thought no more of a challenge to the discourse of looks like a student’s fumbling reminiscence of Titian’s Ecce Homo. The narrative pointless meanders of the path give out in some middle-distance hedge or copse.
if one can speak of our diffuse, polycentric, and global art world as an institution, its art than the widespread consumption of fast food is to the practice of cooking. But staging of the revelation is more telling in its near-repetition of a founding moment Kinkade’s space is not fundamentally traversable, but rather inhabitable, and this
self-conception and the characterization of its contents, structure, and modes of the works do provide the opportunity for reflecting on the limits of seriousness in of contemporary art, when in the late 1940s the student painter Robert Rauschen- within strict boundaries.
authority would appear peculiarly impervious to analysis; allegedly anything can contemporary art, and whether too there might be elements in Kinkade’s work that berg turned from a model and covered a canvas with numbers smudged with a
be a work of art, anyone can make an artwork, and evaluations are individual and could be taken up and put to uses other than Kinkade’s. dirty white. Leo Steinberg famously diagnosed Rauschenberg’s gesture as part of What finally makes the Kinkades so objectionable, so unredeemable for the con-
ineliminably subjective. Lacking even the most porous boundaries, the art world the beginning of a shift away from the deep-seated conception of a picture-plane temporary art world is first of all this compositional strategy that sacrifices every-
would also lack the motivation to engage in an internal dialogue about its limits. It is startling to learn that as a teenager Kinkade apprenticed himself to his next-door as an analogue to the visual field, and towards that of the picture as a kind of work thing suggestive of exploration, anti-rationalism, contingency, and multiple per-
But there is one great monster among recent artists, someone whose work seems neighbor Glenn Wessels, a former student of Hans Hofmann’s who regaled him with surface, hung vertically but worked horizontally, the “flat-bed” picture plane.2 Instead spectives. Then the choice of elements is governed by the implacable criterion that
outside of what anyone inside the art world can treat as even a candidate for seri- stories of Gertrude Stein and Ezra Pound from days of modernist yore. Around the of this typical postmodern and contemporary conception, Kinkade developed a each bit can be seen as exhibiting the Deus sive Natura as radiant light, while con-
ousness: the self-described “painter of light,” Thomas Kinkade, whose works, such age of twenty, while attending art school in Pasadena, Kinkade rejected modernism, conception of the picture plane as what he called “the envelope.” In this concep- tributing seamlessly to the overall envelope. Despite the Christian context, even the
as the one described above, have allegedly graced one in twenty American homes or at least one of its most objectionable yet durable inheritances from romanticism tion the canvas is treated in the all-over manner descended from Monet: no bit is most austere presentation from Paul of the Christian virtues of faith, hope, and char-
in the past two decades. No obituary by a prominent art critic following Kinkade’s that survives until today as a kind of artistic common sense—namely the idea that left unworked, and each part seems to have received precisely the same effort of ity is here mutilated into a placid faith that is indistinguishable from self-satisfaction.
alcohol-and-drug-induced death two years ago suggested the possibility of a post- a work of art is first of all an instance of an artist’s self-expression, particularly of her Kinkade’s attention. The envelope provides both the impression of an overall uni- Perhaps the alleged attraction of all this for the audience untouched by the art world
humous re-evaluation and rehabilitation of Kinkade’s work, even to the small extent mental states, attitudes, moods, and emotions. What replaced this was a conception ty, and the even-treatment of details conveys something of sense that God is in all arises from the induced desire to enter the painting. The Claudian scheme provides
that Norman Rockwell’s has recently undergone. Instead, facts are recited, with the of art as a “service” to its audience. Kinkade seemed to conceptualize the audience things, from the major motifs to the details. multiple points of entry, and the density of detail provides numerous halting points
combination of repetition, lack of explication, and lack of evidence suggestive of a and its needs and interests in ways that largely overlap Immanuel Kant’s views of the for the gaze. The lack of elements bridging from detail to envelope discourages the
social myth being rehearsed: Kinkade was the “most popular” artist of recent time; moral situation of the run of humanity in the famous opening chapter of Groundwork On the evidence of the major catalog of a retrospective of Kinkade’s work3, gaze from moving and comparing. This is bound to the insistence that all windows
his work was loved by the common folk; many collectors began and ended their to the Metaphysics of Morals. Both think ordinary people are decent, possessed of a Kinkade’s distinctive conception seems to have been in place by the late 1980s, with be brightly lit: looking at one is just as rewarding as looking at another, and one is not
days with a good look at a Kinkade; rejecting modernism and “ugliness,” Kinkade secure sense of right and wrong, and have some access to the source and principle refinements into a fully achieved state by the late 1990s. Moonlit Village of (1989) dis- meant to wonder what sort of life requires such unrelieved illumination.
wished to provide beauty and solace. On the other hand the art world condemned of moral values. For both something like the characteristics of modern life trouble, plays the “envelope” in its plausible rendering of a bright moon casting shadows on
the work as either sentimental or kitsch. Perhaps as important as these particular but do not destroy, the moral orientation of ordinary people. For Kant, drawing upon the snow, but bizarrely shows the sky a pale blue that reaches towards Tiepolo. The If this be sentimentality and kitsch, can the art world re-structure itself so as to incor-
admonitions is the qualification that the works are pure: “pure” kitsch, that is. What Rousseau’s account of amour-propre, the problem was the tendency to overrate windows on the church’s spire are a-characteristically unlit, a pre-stylistic holdover porate something of its attractiveness to those immune to the main lines of contem-
one does not find, then or before, is any account of Kinkade’s work as art. It is neither “his majesty the ego,” and to be tempted to except oneself from the demands of suggesting spiritual emptiness, and which as such will be eliminated in succeeding porary art? The finer analysis of the elements of sentimentality and kitsch is beyond
clear what particular qualities are being grouped under these negative terms, nor morality. The appropriate philosophical response to the temptation was to show works. In a typical later piece, Twilight Cottage (1997), the small patch of bluish sky my scope here, but it is interesting that a number of artists have given students the
is there any reflection on why sentimentality and kitsch are uniquely problematic in that such self-exemption was unsustainable, and that the desire to avoid morality shows a crescent moon and an impossible ten stars of at least second-magnitude, assignment of altering a Kinkade. The painter Chester Arnold told me that he has
contemporary art. duties could be checked by the sublime view of oneself as the very author of the while the ambient light easily distinguishes the blues, reds, purples, and lavenders tasked students with setting the Kinkade cottages ablaze. Others have stuck in fig-
moral demands that one considered avoiding. For Kinkade, modern life introduced of flowers. The peculiar mixture of cues indicating direction and intensity of light ures, monsters in the trees or ghouls peeking out the window. I imagine an added
There is a history of vices and so too of what counts as monstrous. A central vice a chaos of ugliness into the world; the remedy would be an art of solace, one which is matched by the mixture of traditional landscape composition on the model of figure representing something of the mood of the poet Georg Trakl’s A Winter Eve-
in modernist painting was “the decorative.” A painting might be condemned as at each point offered the viewer a path out of modern life into a world saturated with Claude with some whiffs of a tamed sublime. The landscapes of Claude typically ning: “Wanderer, step silently inside;/pain has petrified the threshold./There in pure
decorative either by failing to generate a sufficient rich meaningfulness (a constant the source of goodness. In a venerable Christian tradition stretching back at least to have framing elements of hills, buildings, or especially trees, between which alter- radiance/Bread and wine glow upon the table.”4
worry of Kandinsky’s with his abstract painting), or by ‘merely’ illustrating some Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite in the early seventh century, Kinkade identified nating light and dark planes organize spatial recession to a distant horizon or light
text, and gaining its meaning only via relations external to the painting. The wither- the source of goodness as God, and the this-worldly and visible expression of this source. The distance between foreground and the most distant background is tra- 1) Mary Douglas (1975), Implicit Meanings, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, p. 5, summarizing
ing and near-extinction in contemporary art of the term “decorative” as a negative goodness as light. The demand for a contemporary painter of light was born out of versed by a path, through which the viewer gains imaginative access to the con- (1966), Purity and Danger, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
term would then be the result of the developments out of minimalism that treat the an insight into the emptiness of a central modernist myth. 2) Leo Steinberg (1972), Other Criteria, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, and (2000).
tents of the painting. The Claudian space is fundamentally intelligible and made for
external condition of an art work—the architectural environment, the activity of the 3) Encounters with Rauschenberg, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
human exploration. In the sublime paintings of Salvator Rosa the path is broken or 4) Jeffrey Vallance (2004), Thomas Kinkade: Heaven on Earth, Santa Ana: Grand Central
viewer, the institutional structure, the ideological framing—as constitutive elements Part of the social myth of Kinkade connects the rejection of self-expression in art to eliminated, and the viewer is confronted with something mightier than herself. With- Press
of a work. By contrast the terms “sentimental” and “kitsch” maintain their sting from a religious vision. While in class with a nude model, Kinkade was struck by a vision in a fundamentally Claudian conception, Kinkade introduces just enough of the Translation by Jim Doss and Werner Schmidt.
56 [SFAQ Issue 19] 57 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Ulay Act III
Leigh Markopoulos
Uwe Frank Laysiepen, known as Ulay, is unarguably one of the foremost photogra-
phers and performance artists of our time. However, although critically acclaimed,
until recently his pioneering work has remained largely unknown; his forty-five year
contribution to art history often reduced to a focused period during which he fa-
mously collaborated with Marina Abramović. Today his oeuvre seems finally to be
on the verge of garnering more universal recognition with a comprehensive mono-
graph just published1, his first gallery representation, and a recently premiered, and
highly lauded, documentary2 of his successful battle against cancer making the
rounds of the independent film circuits.
In 1994, Thomas McEvilley published Ulay: The First Act / Der Erste Akt—an extend- S-he, 1973-74. Auto polaroid. Courtesy of the artist.
ed conversation with the artist interspersed by the author’s own musings about
and interpretations of Ulay’s solo work to date. His subject’s career as an artist had
in fact begun twenty-six years earlier in Amsterdam in 1969 to be precise. A visit than props to catalyze an alternate reality. They appeal because they convincingly
there in 1968 had sign-posted a different kind of “liberation.” The city pulsed with the seem to represent facets of the artist’s personality, documenting them for analysis
possibility for radical change, fueled by the counter-cultural energy of the Provos at a later stage. They are both mirror and reflection.
and student protests and an active red-light district and drug trade. Unsettled and
electrified, Ulay cut the ties to his family and relocated to the Netherlands. Beyond Less easy to behold are the photographs that show him cutting, pinning, pulling, and
escaping from the suffocation of the bourgeois norms of German society, he was in scraping his body mercilessly. Self-mutilation, drunkenness, and hints of bondage
search of self-knowledge. He began by taking up the camera3, which allowed him characterize the bleaker images and hint at real-life rather than constructed situa-
to document and access his new environment, its architecture and inhabitants. The tions. Bene Agere (In Her Shoes)(1974), for example, shows Ulay processing the de-
pictures he took are remarkable. At the time, much of Amsterdam’s life seemed to parture of a lover by literally trying to put himself in her shoes. Using a utility knife he
be conducted on the streets, and Ulay was there to photograph the students, pro- traces a bloody outline of her ankle boot onto his foot. Another even more disturbing
testers, sex workers, drag queens, and others who made up its diverse demograph- work is [Link] ULTIMA RATIO (1972), which documents the excision of a
ic. His portraits and crowd shots exude excitement and empathy, solidarity, and tattooed square of skin from the artist’s forearm, and its replacement with skin graft- There is a Criminal Touch to Art, 1976. Film still from the Berlin action. Courtesy of the artist.
amazement. His architectural images have the determination and ambition of the ed from his thigh. Recalling Orlan, and later Stelarc, the gesture most clearly por-
Bechers’ serial project, but their protagonists—the city’s grimy terraces and dwell- tended an ambivalent relationship with pain. Overall these photographs document
ings—glower and throb with the intensity of Kippenberger’s Psychobuildings. and establish the terms of use for his body as a medium as well as a vocabulary of
endurance and self-exposure. gy, but the images are not tampered with; the model was anorexic, the bruises on Maria Rus Bojan have persuaded him otherwise and the images have once again
both bodies real. Occasionally accused of trickery, Ulay is keen to underscore that started, thankfully, circulating through his monograph.)
Ulay also turned the camera on himself, authoring a complex autobiographical visu-
Individually and in their totality, the images are perplexing; theatrical, yet convincing; his effects may be achieved through process, but never post-production manipu-
al essay titled Renais sense (re birth). World War II and its aftermath had shattered
tormented, yet uplifting; sexually provocative, yet guileless. Their urgency is con- lation. Wrestling with his public presence and artistic career, Ulay became involved with
any sense of German national identity. The revelations of Nazi atrocities, as well as
veyed in their volume and their immediacy enhanced by the use of Polaroid. Their the newly established De Appel. Founded in 1975 by Wies Smalls (collector and
the urban destruction and post-war occupation by the Allied Forces, inflicted griev-
formats reflect destabilization; many are collages or composites, while some are Performance curator RoseLee Goldberg has retroactively coined the term “per- owner of Seriaale), the organization set out to offer a platform for the research and
ous psychological damage on individuals, coloring every aspect of the country’s so-
further fragmented through the use of mirrors and reflections. Although sharing the formative photography” to classify Ulay’s photos from this period, acknowledging presentation of contemporary art. Realizing that if he could not dictate the reception
cio-political and cultural life. Enmeshed from birth in this destructive narrative, and
prevalent anti-aesthetic approach to photography, formally and conceptually Ulay’s his creation of a new category. The term distinguishes them from documents of of difficult work he could at least influence its framing and promotion, Ulay became
unmoored by the dispersal of his family, Ulay’s quest for rebirth was both personal
work was quite unlike anything else that was being attempted at the time, a fact of performance—itself then in its infancy. This distinction is important: Ulay does not active as a board member and program consultant for the organization. It was at
and political. But, it was played out at a remove and in private, in an extraordinarily
which he was unaware. However, he had by now realized that he identified as an art- consider himself a photographer, but rather an artist who employs photography as his suggestion, then, that Marina Abramović was invited to appear at De Appel in
fertile period of production during the years 1969 to 1975.
ist. a medium. December of 1975.
The numerous discrete series that comprise this extensive body of work depict the
At an earlier stage when he had felt the need for further theoretical and historical At the time, however, the images were misunderstood. Or at least, that is how Ulay Although Ulay had followed Abramović’s career from afar, the artists met in person
artist in a dizzying variety of situations and scenarios. They can be divided rough-
education he had followed his friend, German artist Jürgen Klauke, to Cologne’s experienced the response to his first exhibition of the “personal” Polaroids at Gal- for the first time at the Amsterdam airport in 1975. It was a determining moment for
ly into two genres: in one, Ulay uses props to stage situations; in the other, it is his
Kunstakademie.4 It was during his art school years that he began signing himself erie Seriaale in Amsterdam in 1974. The installation Ulay conceived for The Artist is both of them. Captivated by Abramović’s vitality, Ulay was entranced by her re-per-
body that becomes a prop on which situations are staged. At times an energetic
Ulay, as shorthand for his lengthy name. The moniker stuck. (Interestingly, and Present made use of large metal sheets to line the wall of the gallery. Framed and formance of Thomas Lips in front of a shaken audience on December 5, 1975. De-
cross-dresser capering on the beach (Dunes, 1973), at others a Nijinsky-like faun
pleasingly to the artist, “ulay” is the Hebrew word for “perhaps.”) At the same time as mounted sequentially, Polaroid after Polaroid lined the slabs creating a storyboard- vised for Galerie Krinzinger in Austria earlier that year, this performance has now
writhing through the woods (Elf, 1974), Ulay exudes a sensual, saturnine delight
naming his artistic persona, he began laying the groundwork for collaborative prac- ed narrative that mimicked the frames in a reel of film. This conceit gave the images been performed three times by Abramović and is considered one of her seminal
throughout most of the former category. He is perhaps at his most beguiling and dis-
tice. Although he remained the photographer and more often than not the director, substance at the same time as the slabs provided both armor and support for the works. The artist eats a kilo of honey, drinks a liter of wine, carves a five-point star on
quieting in the images from the series S/he (1973–74). Often borrowing techniques
he shared the stage with Klauke, as well as a number of other friends and lovers. A artist’s revelations. Unfortunately, display and content proved too sensational to al- her stomach, and flagellates herself as a prelude to crucifixion on ice. Documenting
and tropes from Amsterdam’s transvestite community, Ulay presents himself here
photo project from 1975 (Retouching Bruises) alternately pictures Ulay and his ema- low deeper consideration about artistic intent. Disappointed by the responses he Abramović’s progress through this inventory of masochism, Ulay realized that he
as a vertically divided persona: half bewigged and in drag; half louche and stubbly
ciated lover, bruises marking their bodies, and purple thumbprints highlighting the received, Ulay vowed never to exhibit these particular works again. (A promise he had found the personification of the female other, or anima, he had been exploring in
male. Throughout the staggering variety of transformations he remains recogniz-
injuries on the prints themselves. The wordplay draws on photographic terminolo- maintained for many years, although in recent times persistent curators such as his photographs. The twin-like nature of their physical appearance was further en-
ably himself. The characters he presents are expressions of an interior truth, rather
58 [SFAQ Issue 19] 59 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Fototot 1, 1976. Performance documentation from De Appel. Courtesy of the artist. Fototot 1, 1976. Performance documentation from De Appel. Courtesy of the artist.
hanced by the discovery that they were born on the same day, November 30, albeit denial of the rights of its immigrant labor force, this symbolic and actual violation of
three years apart. the boundaries of the art institution, art, and politics set the scene for the period of
collaboration with Abramović—or Act II.
By all accounts, the meeting was significant for both artists and the times that fol-
lowed were happy, intense, and productive. Before they could collaborate artistical- Despite the hardships that they endured due to their uncompromising pursuit of an
ly, however, both had to consider the implications for their solo careers. Ulay had a ethical performative and collaborative practice, and their bitter break up, the years
number of public performances he wanted to undertake, one a series signaling the together are remembered fondly by both artists. The details of their peripatetic life-
(as it turned out, temporary) end to his photographic work, and the other a dramatic style during the early days are by now familiar—the five years spent living and trav-
intervention. Recently re-performed5, Fototot (“photo-death”) was a radical tri-par- eling in a customized, but ultimately small, van, the struggles for survival: Abramović
tite action, one of the first to underscore the ephemerality of photography as a me- cooking, knitting, and selling sweaters to make money; Ulay managing mechanical
dium. For the first part, audiences were invited into the darkened space of De Appel. repairs, their accounts, and bookings; and the performances in small venues for
The lights were turned on revealing nine large photographic portraits of a veiled fig- small fees and audiences. Their existence blurred the boundaries between art and
ure receding up a road. Unfixed and mounted high on the gallery walls, the photos life, and their practice drew on this ambiguity. The manifesto they devised early on
started fading to black 30 seconds after being exposed to the light. The variously to structure their collaboration enshrined this paradox. Titled “Art Vital,” it espoused:
bemused and anxious responses to this disappearance were photographed by
Ulay and formed the subject of the second part. Entering the same space at a later No fixed living-space
Diamond Plane, 1974. Auto polaroid. Courtesy of the artist.
date, visitors were confronted by a folder, invitingly placed on a table lit by a desk- Permanent movement
lamp. As soon as it was opened, the contents of this folder, unfixed images of the Direct contact
first event, also evanesced. For the final part, staged at Beyer Galerie, in Wuppertal, Local relation
Germany, Ulay kitted himself out with a crash helmet and strapped a large mirror Self-selection by both in 1999 allows for works from 1976–80 to be credited Ulay/Abramović, preserve the films. (The idea came to him after reading about Chaplin’s successful
to his front. Video documentation of the performance shows him swaying slightly Passing limitations whereas those from 1981–88 are credited Abramović/Ulay. The distinction is signifi- preservation of his film reels.) Thus it was Ulay who orchestrated how these works
under the weight of the glass pane, before kipping forward. The mirror shatters and Taking risks cant, if not always observed. It is true also that the later performances relied increas- were to live on in our imaginations.
the audience gasps. Ulay, however, is miraculously unharmed. Frustrating audience Mobile energy ingly on the use of props and costumes (rather than nudity or everyday clothing)
expectation, denying photography’s claim to memorialize, or even to reflect accu- No rehearsal and on one occasion even took the form of an ensemble performance at a theater. It was also Ulay who scored the performance instructions. “We are standing naked
rately the present, with this work Ulay signaled a new chapter in his practice. Photo No predicted end in the entrance of the Museum . . .” begins the score for Imponderabilia, evincing an
was dead, long live the artist. No repetition Much remains by way of documentation of the Relation Works, as the performances economy of words worthy of Beckett. It was Abramović, however, who resuscitated
that the artists undertook during this time are collectively known. The early works them, negating the terms of Art Vital (“no repetition”) by adapting and re-performing
Once extricated from the shards, he was able to turn his attention to his final solo “Permanent movement” and “taking risks” alone meant a continuous raising of the in particular are indelibly etched in the performance canon. They have been hand- them as part of her personal repertoire. Originally taking place in off-beat locations
undertaking for a while—Action in 14 Predetermined Sequences: There is a Criminal stakes. And while their ideas did not develop in a vacuum—Ulay cites in particular ed down to us as a series of photographic vignettes—Ulay and Marina colliding (from Galerie H-Humanic in Graz to the Studenski Kulturni Center in Belgrade) in
Touch to Art. This stupendously daring and outrageously provocative action sur- the works of Vito Acconci, Chris Burden, and Gina Pane as inspiration6—they did re- headlong into each other (Relation in Space, 1976), or flanking a narrow doorway front of small audiences, it was shocking to see the works included in her 2010 ret-
vives as a documentary film (viewable on [Link]). As described in the scripted tain a discipline and specificity to their relationship that was compelling. Undeniably through which embarrassed visitors squeeze (Imponderabilia, 1977), or locked in an rospective at MoMA, New York. Decontextualized (no “local relation”) and institu-
instructions that are part of the piece, in December 1976 the artist entered the Neue their chemistry was part of the draw. embrace, breathing each other’s exhalations to the point of collapse (Breathing In/ tionalized, their simple, potent directives were fulfilled by anonymous youths trained
Nationalgalerie in Berlin, removed Carl Spitzweg’s painting Der Arme Poet (The Breathing Out, 1977). Abstracted from their contexts, these images function as pow- by Abramović (“no rehearsal”). For many, Ulay was present retroactively, through
Poor Poet, 1839) from the gallery walls, and, clutching it under his arm, sprinted out As word spread of their performances, invitations to present their work multiplied. erful, absurdist metaphors for gender and relationship stereotypes. What is missing his communion with Abramović during her performance The Artist is Present (a title
of a fire exit with the security guards in pursuit. The theft of this national treasure was Their travel itinerary also intensified and they traveled increasingly farther afield. A of course is everything else that made them so compelling as performances: audi- that could be considered an ironic homage in light of Ulay’s 1974 solo show). At the
not staged; it was as much a surprise to Ulay as to the guards that it succeeded. The disorienting but formative trip to the Australian outback lasted for longer than an- ence, environment, energy, anticipation, the element of surprise, contemporaneity. time of writing, a 3:38 minute video excerpt of the encounter posted on YouTube a
work was destined for the wall of a Turkish Gastarbeiter (guest worker) family, in the ticipated; Ulay wanted to stay, Abramović to return. Ultimately, their expectations year ago has garnered 8,825,342 views. Though one could attribute the numbers to
city’s Kreuzberg district. After successfully hanging it there, Ulay called the gallery’s proved irreconcilable and a work that was initially supposed to signal their perma- Both documents and the repertoire of the performances raise a number of issues Abramović’s publicity machinery, undoubtedly part of the appeal resides in the pal-
director to confess and let him know where he could find the painting. Outraged nent union instead marked its end. Taking place in 1988, The Great Wall Walk in- related to ownership and (re)presentation. To quote Abramović, “Each of us brought pable tension and emotion flowing between the two artists, a warmer echo of Night
national media responses and a trial followed, but Ulay again emerged unscathed, volved Ulay and Abramović starting at the east and west ends, respectively, of this a certain luggage—I brought a suitcase of performance, in his suitcase was pho- Sea Crossing (1981–87), one of their seminal durational performances.
despite a court summons and a mild sentence (36 days in prison, which he never monumental structure and walking its length. They met in the middle, on June 28, tography.”7 The photographs, accordingly, were generated by Ulay, although they
served, instead paying a small fine). The grainy black and white documentation of after three months of arduous trekking, with the sad realization that their partner- are infrequently credited to him. Using a tripod camera taped in place, a fixed angle, It’s a problem raised not only by this partnership, or by these performances. We can
this action—a composite that includes film from a small handheld—is lent menace ship had run its course. and focus all determined in advance, Ulay relied on an assistant to actually click the think of the implications of exhibiting or recreating Fluxus scores, for example, or
and a sense of inevitability by the accompanying sound of an unplugged amp. The shutter at regular intervals. He art directed these shots, even if he did not physical- Kaprow’s Happenings, or even the bloody antics of the Vienna Actionists. We imag-
insistent, low, rhythmic hum heightens the tension and romance of this quixotic While it might not seem productive to attribute responsibility for either the break or ly take them himself.8 It was Ulay also who preserved the archive of these images, ine the shock value of a headless chicken running across the floor being endured by
gesture. At once personal manifesto and political commentary on Germany’s willful the performances to one or other of the partners, it is true that an agreement signed customizing a freezer box and filing cabinet to the interior of their van, for example, to audiences similarly tolerant and educated in performance norms, but in fact these
events were often spontaneous, random, and sparsely attended. Audience re-
sponses ranged from boredom to aggression and even on occasion to intervention,
changing the nature of the event. If a performance is understood as the synthesis of
a number of factors—biography, personality, time, place, audience—then a reen-
actment can never be anything but an emulation, however distinct or a/effective it
becomes in its own right.
While Ulay never completely retired his camera, he began using it again for artistic Bene Agere [In Her Shoes], 1974. Auto polaroid. Courtesy of the artist.
ends in 1984, co-producing with Abramović parallel bodies of photographic work.
These were for the most part staged, individual portraits of the two artists. Appear-
ing as silhouettes, shadows, or even marionette-like figures, they are ciphers rather
than believable characters. It doesn’t take too great a leap of the imagination to see
these as attempts to gain distance and reflect on the disconnect between self and
artistic persona, as well as perhaps the status of this self within their artistic relation-
ship. age and postwar art. He also instructed them in basic photography, set up a studio the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. Undoubtedly these factors will bring changes.
with a digital camera on a tripod and a variety of props (objects, clothing etc.), and It’s to be hoped, however, that the punk side of Ulay’s nature which has brought him
It’s perhaps no surprise that the break up in 1988 was followed by a period of ten invited patients to create their own environment and take their own portraits over a this far, will never allow him to stop pushing the boundaries of his mediums, whether
years in which neither artist had contact with the other. The beginning of Act III had Molotov cocktail, 1992. Cant beat the Feeling, polaroid/polacolor, Boston. Courtesy of the artist.
three-week period. Sixteen participants contributed 260 moving and surreal imag- photography, the body, or life itself.
to be marked by a hiatus. In Ulay’s case, equilibrium was provided by another rela- es to the resulting book I Am Other. The Delusion: An Event About Art and Psychiatry
tionship, marriage, and the birth of a daughter. For four years he focused on his new (2002). One can see this project as an example of Ulay offering a personal set of
family. An invitation from the Polaroid headquarters in Boston, MA to work with their for the Dead, 1992, for instance, the light reflecting from a variety of glass containers tools for establishing identity to his subjects. In this way, and others, many of his proj-
giant-format (80” x 40”) Polagram camera catalyzed the next phase of his career. If is impressed on polagram prints. More recently, in 2010, cell-phone imagery from a ects remain collaborative keeping the boundaries between art and life, Ulay and his
his earliest photos could be said to be self-portraits, and his subsequent ones por- trek in Patagonia documents a search for water sources. Ulay has even founded an subjects, porous.
traits of a relationship, then the more recent ones can be understood as portrait of institute called Nastati in Ljubljana with Slovenian graphic designer Lena Pislak (his
society, or of life in general, as viewed through the literal and personal lens of the art- partner for a number of years and wife since 2012). This is a self-styled “private insti- An appealing example of this blurring can be found in his educational strategies
ist. In this way, Ulay’s expansive, ongoing inquiry resembles Sigmar Polke’s (an artist tute for art projects and creative solutions” with the grand ambition of providing “lo- during his years as a professor of new media at the Hochschule für Gestaltung,
he admires greatly) project to reflect life. Indeed, Ulay is insistent that art must derive cal solutions to global problems,” developing a “universal language,” and providing a Karslruhe in Germany (1998–2004). The “pedo-patetic” seminars he pioneered
from life, that it gains immediacy and authority purely from engaging with proximate 1) Maria Rus Bojan and Alessandro Cassin, Whispers: Ulay on Ulay, (Amsterdam: Valiz, 2014).
platform for ideas and education. Whether or not it is able to succeed in its ambitions there may have been modeled somewhat on Plato’s academy, but owed more to 2) Project Cancer, 2013, directed by Damjan Kozole.
and urgent issues, rather than constructed situations. It’s worth considering in this remains to be seen; its existence, however, underscores his belief in the ability of art his experience of Australian Aboriginal walkabouts and his belief in discipline and 3) Ulay’s preferred camera remains the polaroid 980. His preference for Polaroid dating from
context that he has never had a studio, and that he continues to seek out his subject and artists to effect change. endurance. In search of self-knowledge, students and teacher would head off to the his commercial laboratory days in Germany, resulted in an invitation from the company to
material in situ, whether out on the street or in the desert. Black Forest for a week with nothing other than the clothes on their back, hunting for function as one of their artists-at-large. This enlightened gesture on the company’s part ex-
Ulay’s oft-quoted maxim, “art without ethics is cosmetics,” is literalized in photo- food and sleeping rough. tended to a number of artists who were given equipment and film to test and report back on, in
An unwavering political and ethical commitment and a keen sense of social justice graphic projects from the nineties until today that continue to push the boundaries exchange for a certain number of images and collaboration on projects (in Ulay’s case, a book
inform this perspective. Espousing a multiplicity of causes, Ulay has used his art to of both medium and content. His subjects primarily comprise the disenfranchised of photographs of four cities: Amsterdam, London, New York and Berlin).
Act III, scene I saw Ulay reestablishing the terms of his personal practice. Scene II
help campaign for women’s rights in Morocco, to advocate for clean water in Ra- 5) November 21, 2012. Museum of Modern Art, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
and marginalized, whether the homeless, the aged, African Americans, immigrant found him struggling against lymphoma. What happens in scene III, now that he’s
mallah, and to help save the elephants in Sri Lanka. An interest in the conservation 6) In conversation with the author, Amsterdam, June 8, 2014.
groups, the Australian aboriginals, or the mentally ill. To commemorate their cen- back, remains to be seen. It’s clear that a determining factor will be the overtures that 7) Project Cancer, 2013
and preservation of the world’s water supplies runs like a stream through the last tennial, the Vincent Van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry in Venray, the Netherlands, the art establishment is making to him—exhibition offers, gallery shows, an art mar- 8) It is necessary to add that certain aspects of some works were restaged post-event if they
twenty years of his practice, expressing itself in numerous bodies of work. In Water commissioned Ulay, who worked with patients to give workshops on photo report- ket presence. In 2015 he plans to take up performance again, with an appearance at were unsuccessfully documentation failed the first time around.
62 [SFAQ Issue 19] 63 [SFAQ Issue 19]
S-he, 1973-74. Auto polaroid. Courtesy of the artist. SFAQ[Project] by Ulay
Mark McCloud
In Conversation With V. Vale For sure. That’s it. It becomes a matter of style—the way you conduct your inves-
tigation here is entirely up to that. So it is very important, the style you settle on, or
choose.
San Francisco Bay Area, the Mediterranean of the West, has nurtured
its own world-changing cultural renaissance always placing a premi- Although that can change. Okay, let’s go back to Mark McCloud, the
um on imagination, ideas, innovation, and risk-taking, with practicality, artist. Here’s my perception of you: I don’t think anybody is without a
business development, and publicity/marketing/branding left to the context. Everybody is attached to some kind of so-called aesthetic tra-
likes of New York and London. So it should come as no surprise that ditions, even if they’re more rebellious and lesser-known ones. I only
the birthplace of the countercultural sixties, San Francisco, has for knew you as an artist in two realms. I thought you could be a great ac-
years boasted the world’s first (yet little-known) LSD museum dedi- tor and comedian, but at least we got some really nice pictures of you
cated to archiving any and all material evidences of the effects of this in the tabloid RE/Search Number One, in which you’re acting a role.
vision-inducing chemical on cultural production. The visionary behind That’s funny! I always tell everyone I’m a reclining comedian. That I’m too laid back
this “Institute of Illegal Images” is one Mark McCloud, a photographer, to do standup!
sculptor, painter, art teacher, amateur comedian, and the preeminent
collector of LSD blotter paper art (he owns an estimated 33,000 sheets They should just bring a psychiatrist couch on stage and then you
of paper bearing miniature artworks). His archive also includes a col- should do it.
lection of LSD license plates (!), rare periodicals, and books having to That’s it! I looked into the reclining Buddha thing a little bit.
do with psychedelia, surgical instruments, apothecary bottles, paint-
ings, posters, antiques—the list goes on and on. He has had several art You could be the first psychiatrist on stage. Hire some straight man to
shows of his LSD blotter art, most recently at Ever Gold Gallery in San play psychiatrist while you’re free-associating on a couch.
Francisco. Sadly, Mr. McCloud has twice (1993, 2001) had to prove to a Yeah, a lot of us are frustrated musicians and stuff, but I’m definitely a frustrated co-
judge and jury that he collects and makes art, not LSD. median. I really did have that role in school. I was always the class clown. And I spent
time working at it. The sense of humor that my mom passed on to me—my dad
Mark McCloud recently talked to V. Vale, publisher of Search & De- didn’t have much of one, but mom really has a great sense of humor. I think that’s the
stroy (1977–79) and RE/Search (1980–present). In 1980 Vale featured stylistic aid that’s been most important. Especially when you have problems with the
Mr. McCloud in a photo spread for RE/Search #1, shot on the roof of State. If you don’t have a sense of humor you’re never going to get out of there. So I
Vale’s North Beach apartment building, and he also featured Mr. Mc- always retain that. Your sense of humor they can’t really take from you.
Cloud in RE/Search #11: Pranks! Visitors come from around the world
to visit the LSD museum (email mark@[Link]. No cost; seri- [Sings] “They can’t take that away from you.”
ous inquiries only). Mark McCloud has a complexly humorous conver- Yeah, but you know how hard it is: when you finally have to accept the term, and it’s
sational style filled with oblique puns, references, and lateral detours, very open-ended, when you become an artist you declare yourself an artist, and you
which makes for a challenging interview. Join us for the ride! may not really fit the bill. But it’s the closest word we have for that social role. And I’m
very much into the Aristotelian view of art, because I like that arrangement—with
So let’s focus on our goal. My goal is to bring maximum respect—that’s a group, with a society, of being a type of pioneer that’s on the outer edge of the
the first goal of the piece. society, and your responsibility is to get way, way out there. And then to meet the
I’m ready for tar and feathers! I’ve seen it come up every which way! requirements of the group you show them what you’re up to every once in a while.
That clears your social debt. I think that’s a very good arrangement; I’ve never had
Well, there are probably three parts to everything in life, and one is the a problem with that. I think the less socially tied an artist is, the better his ability to
unknown background that brought you to where you are now, i.e., the employ his aesthetic, maybe. Mark McCloud in Paris, early 1970s. Courtesy of the artist.
bothersome details of geography and academic institutions.
Still baffling! That’s where the adventure is: it’s on the borderland.
Right, but the artist’s responsibility to the group is very uncertain nowadays. Usually that involves some speaking, let’s face it. Not Peter Selz—
Anyway, I know what people want to know about. Yeah, but very little. I was always amazed by the lack of written requirements at Da- No. You know that Gabrielle, his daughter, has written a book that became a best
That’s good, Vale, because I sure don’t! What happened to me is pretty standard. It’s always Hegelian too sort of—you and I are talking now in just word vis, but if you wanted a degree from Harvard or Yale you had to mostly write your seller? Did you know her? She was around for a while, a very interesting person, but
Not standard in that it happens to everyone, but every once in a while someone falls languages, but there are other languages, all kinds of languages. And dissertation and not paint it or sculpt it. But at Davis you could be deaf or mute as she’s grown up the daughter of Peter, in quite unusual circumstances, and she wrote
through the cracks and has a rapturous moment. That’s all that happened to me: artists, I think, expand visual languages or symbolic languages. But long as you were “producing” and you passed the evaluations. If they liked what you a good book. She was here about a year ago doing a reading. We all bought the
your typical everyday rapture! It took me away from wherever I was headed and then the only way we can process that, or one of the main ways, is were doing, it didn’t matter if you could read or write—it really didn’t. The great Bob book to see if we were mentioned. Thank God she spared us. But very interesting
pointed me in the direction that I’m in now. That’s a very complicated thing because through words. And words are always reductionist, and they never to- Arneson, when given a couple of pages of his retrospective at the Museum of Mod- people. Peter’s big artists were the beautiful Niki de Saint-Phalle and Jean Tinguely.
it’s so fashioned for you alone. And no one goes collectively to rapture. It’s always a tally “nail” anything. ern Art—they held the publication up as long as they could—when he finally turned
naked proposition, like you showed up naked and you go naked. The dream that life No. That’s the gentlemen’s agreement that makes the place a good place to meet. in his words it just said, “Words.” And they had to put that in two pages of the catalog. Tinguely is huge in my world.
becomes is pointed out to you as you’re going along. I think that that was the big- And I like the parameters that we’ve all agreed upon to use here. If we don’t have a The aesthetics that I liked a lot were like Henry Moore where he says, “The talk I put Me too. When in Basel a few years ago at Albert Hoffman’s hundredth birthday, on
gest influence in my life: having a death/rebirth experience that led to rapture. Not an name for the thing we’ll draw a line around it and give it a name, or try to come close into the piece, rather than talk it.” So he puts the effort of socializing the artwork right my day off that’s what I did: I went to Jean’s museum and hung out.
easy thing to recommend, since you have to die to have a death/rebirth experience! to it. into the artwork, and doesn’t have time to talk about it. And I thought: “That’s a very
I was lucky. refreshing idea.” I went there too.
That’s why I liked when conceptual art happened. It was kind of a Oh, good, Vale, what a great place. I bribed the guard and he let me sit in that Formu-
Luck is very important in life. Luck and chance, I’m convinced. cop-out in a way that it said—well as I understood it—you don’t have to I guess I don’t truly understand what you just said. la One car they had. It was a Formula One Lotus that I guess he owned. They had it
Absolutely. And I think we all picked the right motive to “volunteer” for coming here, make any “real” art anymore, you can just speak an idea. Henry Moore wasn’t a big talker about his sculpture. Whenever someone asked at the museum and I got to sit in it.
and then we have problems processing it. And it’s about getting over those prob- And I was definitely in a place where Nauman went, and he wasn’t there when I about his work he would say, “Well, the effort I would put into talking about it I have al-
lems and processing them that makes you either a happy, fulfilled person or a frus- showed up, but his trail was very, very evident. ready put into the piece.” I thought that’s really great. You know the difference. That’s Something symbolic there—
trated, unhappy person. why Bob Arneson sending in . . . what’s he trying to do with Words? The words have All his friends were Formula One racers, his best friends. He was definitely into that.
What was that trail? I don’t know much about it. very little to do with it other than the title. At one point funk art relied upon these com- But I love the Jean Tinguely museum, that whole attitude toward the social group,
I always said everyone is an artist, everyone is a writer, and everyone is Just the Bruce Nauman conceptual art approach, that Leo Castelli put forward. It ical titles that were usually puns, thus earning the term “funk.” That term came out where you’re blacklisted by society for the de Gaulle funeral piece. When de Gaulle
a musician, and all that— was never Bruce Nauman alone. Bruce Nauman always showed with Stephen of the Deaf Club; as it turns out, Joan Brown, and our beautiful Bruce Conner, and died they hired Jean Tinguely to do the Charles de Gaulle funeral piece outside of
Because that’s really the only interplay in the Deus ex machina; the thing is so well Kaltenbach, and Stephen Kaltenbach would do a conceptual group of works and Manuel Neri came up with the term one night at the old Deaf Club [1979-1980, San Notre Dame Cathedral. Inside was the Shah of Iran with Dick Nixon, and Kissinger,
designed that the only interplay is the aesthetic. You can get the engine to hum bet- then Bruce would do a conceptual group of works, and Castelli would show them Francisco punk rock venue], back in the ‘50s, and they decided to call it funk art, and and everybody mourning Charles, and Tinguely set up a huge monument outside
ter if your aesthetics are applied, but that seems to be the only interplay there is. both together. People retained Bruce Nauman’s name in the registry much more Kienholz and all those people were involved. And a lot of the conceptual work I was with the covering on, and as the sun set they pulled off the covering and it was this
than they did Kaltenbach’s. But when you go to UC Davis [where Nauman and inundated with in graduate school was mostly about the titles . . . of Bruce Nauman’s enormous penis that spewed fireworks and self-incinerated. Of course he was
I would say that I started my publishing with one simple goal: to fight Kaltenbach both received master’s degrees] and you get your MFA at Davis, the From Hand to Mouth casting. A resin casting of his mouth leading down to his hand. blackballed by all after that, and no one touched him until Disney hired him to do
the control process. But I think that we’re actually controlled most by people that have come there before you leave a strong impression. So when I got to A lot of it was based on that—very, very small-word associations to the object. I for- these fountains at Disneyworld in the ‘70s. But for many years Jean Tinguely was
our aesthetic. Davis it was all about conceptual art. You didn’t need to speak or draw. If you could get the beautiful guy running UC Berkeley at the time— blacklisted by all society for this funeral piece. I’ll show it to you when I visit. I’ve got a
conceptualize you were “in.” very rare book with it in there, this awesome piece.
But we’re talking about you, though. And I don’t know how you even got I’m trying to think of other artists that were associated with that, like
the idea to make art out of blotter acid packaging—what do you call it? Peter Max.
It’s from being raised in Argentina. You remember that humanity forgot how to make Yeah, and Isaac Abrams is still with us, and Peter is still alive, who put the vision on
toys right after the Second World War? You know this very well that the toys were the Slurpee cup. That’s what Peter did—he put the psychedelic vision on the 7-11
thin after the Second World War. We didn’t get any good toys until they remembered, cup. He’s the guy that brought it down to the street level.
“Hey! We used to make toys!” One of the first little things that caught my attention
were these books you would get at the local grocery store. There were these empty Who is Isaac?
books, and then you would buy these gum pieces that came with these pogs. They Isaac Abrams, a beautiful painter who did the cover of that book, the Masters and
were like little printed circles of paper or little rectangles and they’d have a general Houston’s book Psychedelic Art, when they dosed those hundred artists and stud-
theme to the book like Weaponry of the Second World War. And you’d buy the gum ied their paintings. Isaac is still painting in Woodstock and you see his work every-
and fill the book with these pogs, and if you were able to complete the whole book where, on album covers mostly, like Mati Klarwein, the father of psychedelic art.
you would win the bicycle! So then after a few months of filling your book you real-
ized that they had only made three of the German submarine pogs, and that that’s Mati Klarwein is? Is he really?
the one you needed to complete your book, you know? Absolutely. Yeah, and Mati’s church is the church that inspired Alex to make his
church, Alex Gray. So it’s really Mati who was the Castalia foundation in Mexico, trip-
They rigged the game. What did you call them? ping heavily on the mushrooms and painting, and also at Millbrook. He followed the
Pogs. It’s a term my kid taught me; when they started using them they called them muse around and was there painting it. He’s really the first guy to take it—other than
pogs. But we called them fioritas [sic] when I grew up, and you could gamble with like people like Henri Michaux who did mescaline investigation artistically.
them, you could come to school with your extra ones and then we would stand in
front of a wall and, by putting the pog between our top digits, then flick the pog to- Yeah, that book Miserable Miracle got reissued recently.
ward the wall. Whichever pog got closest to the wall got all the pogs. It was like the Yeah, I’m so glad, it was so hard to get and Miserable Miracle is such a masterpiece.
first gambling. It was all about these little pogs. There was no art and everything was Our views of mysticism are very, very secluded in our society. The Pope having
dried blood and gray after the Second World War, and then the first colored little bought all the evidence and holding it close to his chest in the Vatican. And so then a
things I saw were these pogs. If you completed the collection you got the bicycle! lot of the mysticism due to our generation has been selected to not be shown to us.
The promise of this vehicle that could take you far! Anyway, that’s what happened The prohibiting of the portrayal of Adam and Eve under the amanita muscaria mush-
to me. From collecting these little pogs when I first came to California and started room, as always was portrayed, became illegal in the late 17th century. Punishable by
seeing first the window pane and then later that developed into blotter—when I saw death or excommunication. And the tango wasn’t legal in the U.S. until 1932, Vale.
the first blotters I realized, “Now these are the pogs of our psychedelic group, and if VEE, 1985. Luster , glaze, clay 15 inches x 13 inches. Courtesy of the artist.
you complete the book you win the bicycle!” But that’s really all it was. In my death/ That’s amazing.
rebirth experience, part of the vision was that I was in the environment, kind of like So the role of society in the arts is something that’s always the pull and tug.
So you collected this art; you didn’t make it.
Earth, you know, and I was being observed by Apollo and the rest of the celestial
No—François Truffaut and the other art critic who worked for Cahiers du Cinéma
magistrates, and they were commenting on me, saying what I was doing. And part So we have to bring things back to your wonderful psychedelic art ca-
for André Bazin: Godard, yeah, and they were both art critics who after a few years,
of it was that: about the search for the elements that constituted the total unity of all reer.
he said to them, “You know, the good art critics make movies.” And he forced them
things. That pattern. You hope to get your volunteering cause done, even though it’s probably impossi-
to make movies. And so then that’s what happened to me: after collecting avidly for
ble, and you try to work on your project, whatever it is you’ve come to do, but if you’re
fifteen years, I decided to learn more by making some. And then one thing led to
Or at least metaphors for “the unity of all things.” rewarded on top of that with a rapturous experience then wow—you’re very grate-
another.
And the overlaying pattern that entails that. Because when you see the total unity of ful. So that’s the big change in my life that led me toward the arts. I was lost and then
Timothy Leary and Mark McCloud, 1994. Courtesy of the artist. all things visually it makes metaphysical and mathematical sense. They’re aligned I was found. And I think all “found” people are artists.
And you got some notoriety, fame, whatever the word is, and that
properly, and that’s why the conceptualists, or Castelli, had the vision of containing
brought the attention of the flics [French slang for policemen].
Bruce Nauman by showing him with Steve Kaltenbach, because Steve Kaltenbach They say you find yourself by making art.
It’s funny because you gave me one of your psychedelic, super bright, Les gendarmes. But no, the first blotter show at the Art Institute was also attended
went on to become one of the best psychedelic landscape painters ever. He saw a That’s it. What better way? You can commit every mistake that leads you to not mak-
Day-Glo-colored sculptures that I called a turtle, and we had a green by the FBI. They showed up and they said, “Can we photograph this?” And I said,
pattern on nature that he’s been trying to paint for many, many years. It’s very hard ing mistakes without hurting anybody, in the arts.
plant-like sort of Ballardian Drowned World sculpture in the corner for “Sure, this is for you guys, more so than anyone else,” I told them. Because they were
to see his paintings because you can’t buy a Steve Kaltenbach. You can only trade
a while that was five feet tall. It was green like some tropical plant, and the last whores who came to the party!
time to a blind institution and earn one. He’s one of my favorite living artists. Mistakes into art, often.
in my own mind, since I’m of limited knowledge, I had already associat-
For sure. That’s really what the blotter collection is. One bad idea leads to another!
ed you with the funk art movement, as well as an odd mutant strain of Whores?
That’s weird. He’s still alive?
psychedelia, because I don’t know—most of the psychedelia, when you Yeah, the acid party; they’re still trying to arrest us. So I told them, when they showed
Very much alive, and he’s been teaching art for 40 years at Sacramento State Col- Are you saying you didn’t make the actual physical art that constitutes
think of art you think mostly of those posters that do tricks with your up in ‘87 at the Art Institute, I said, “Yeah, of course you can photograph it. You’re the
lege. This incredibly cool artist. He did lots of time pieces that got buried in buildings. the blotter acid art that’s in the frames?
eyes. I don’t think so much of any painters or sculptors when I think of guys that don’t understand it yet.” And really, that’s what’s going on. The fliic is tor-
He is a very dynamic artist, check him out. The Art Institute brings him in about once It’s nothing that Duchamp hadn’t taught us. Marcel’s found objects. To me it’s just
the psychedelic hippie era. But still, it seems if you’re looking for a cul- mented by his own demented fears.
every ten years for a lecture. He’s a very humble— that. I’ve put the found object in a frame.
tural continuum, you’re coming out of those and now you’re telling me
that in person. Bruce Conner too was tied in with funk art. I remember Yeah, I suppose so.
SFAI brings him in— And then if you sign it, it’s yours. Duchamp taught us that.
seeing a show so long ago at SFMOMA. That’s why they’re so against it, they think—yeah, and it’s still not over yet. It’s incred-
We get to see him locally a little, but he’s one of my heroes artistically and personally. That’s true. Tim offered to sign it all; as Tim was dying and he told me he would take
Yeah, and the beauty of Bruce is incredible. The range of vision he had. I was always ible to me: the persistence of erroneous information.
I got to spend a couple years with him, tripping with him and studying his views. Very, the blame for all of it if I wanted to lighten my load!
amazed by the quality of the artwork. He was like Oracle-tied also, so he couldn’t
very interesting, beautiful artist.
help but have a huge psychedelic side to his work. I think even one of the most cher- They didn’t understand art; you had to educate the jury and everybody
Oh, nice.
ished acid test publications is one of Bruce’s from like ‘65. And Bruce has this tre- on art.
Up in Davis? Anyway, but yeah, I love that type of artwork, but it’s really that. I was into numis-
mendous influence on funk art, on Kienholz, and that’s really the art we associate It’s not an easy one. My poor attorney, you know? My poor, poor attorney.
Up in Sacramento, Davis area. matists also—you know, a coin collector. So I was used to looking at small detailed
with the Beats. You know, other than Bucket of Blood. [Roger Corman film satirizing
things and appreciating the way they were made. As the blotter got better I took
a Beat “artist.”] But even Bucket of Blood has that little tinge of Conner in it! Or Kien- You said that one of your attorneys demonstrated to the jury that a lot
Your so-called mentors— more notice. Beautiful Nick West, who you will remember, put some hits in Sluggo
holz, at least. And you know, artists, when asked what sense they would last give up, of money had been made, and that impressed people: “Oh, it must be
Fewer and fewer are alive. Sky dying and then Arthur Lee. All I’ve got left is Vale and Number Three and I thought that was such a brilliant move that he also inspired me
I think all agree that their vision, it’s the one they’d hang on ‘til the end. art if it makes money.”
Roky. greatly to collect.
Yeah, they had followed $24,000 into the house. There’s no illegality of receiving
money in the mail, and someone had sent me $24,000 cash. They taped it into a
70 [SFAQ Issue 19] 71 [SFAQ Issue 19]
super bright dayglo colored sculpture things you made, but what hap-
pened to them all? Where are they?
You show up naked, and you split naked, and that’s pretty much all you get, Vale.
Okay, let’s go back and tell me all the forbidden stuff you never tell
anyone, like where were you born?
I was born in Gross Pointe, Michigan. My dad had a really good insurance program
at the time that allowed them to move from Detroit, where they lived, to Gross Pointe.
So I was born in the hospital in Gross Pointe.
Which one?
It’s called Melinda’s Neck. I was in my element so it was comfortable. I wasn’t having
to contort myself into somebody’s idea of a role. I really can’t do that, I don’t have
the acting chops. I’m too self-conscious. I can only be confident when I’m actually
relating with somebody, and that’s the way we made that movie. We were kind of
more or less improvising, and we were just relating to each other. We weren’t trying
to fit into roles.
76 [SFAQ Issue 19] The Heartbreakers, 1975. Photograph by Bob Gruen. Richard Hell, 1977. Photograph by Kate Simon.
Bill Daniel Every Train Calls Your Name
Bill Daniel [left] and Jocko Weyland [right] in Tucson, AZ, Dec. 2014. Photograph by Lila Lee. Tony Offender and H. R., Bad Brains, Esther’s Pool, Austin, Texas, April 6th, 1982. Courtesy of the artist.
In Conversation With Jocko Weyland Starting here, at the Chaffin Diner in Tucson, let’s begin in the present.
This tour, the Tri-X Noise tour, you woke up one day and wanted to get
Tell me about the logistics. The term has been drained of meaning, but
it certainly is the definition of DIY.
So now you have the pickup truck. You built the walls, the display
device—they go on the roof—and the prints are packed up in the bed
on the road again? How long had it been since you’d done that? Well the logistics is really the art of it. You know, if you’re poor you wash your own of the truck. It’s a lot of work and I suppose sometimes you might want
Incisively and poetically documenting the crooks and crannies of Once I landed in LA in 2011 that was the end of a phase of a lot of touring, though I clothes, or mow your own yard, or change your own oil. You could aestheticize it if to just have them put up on a wall in a gallery and get a check in the
the American cultural periphery, and tenaciously taking what he has went out with Ralph White earlier this year for a couple of weeks; a regional thing. you want to but it’s really a matter of organization. Certainly all visual artists have mail?
found and crafted out on the road, Bill Daniel has three decades of Really me just providing A/V backup for my friend Ralph, him playing his tunes, music that guides them—or most do. With this tour specifically I am trying to do Well the artwork would be better if I didn’t spend ninety percent of my time on
remarkable creation to show for his tireless efforts. His vivid chronicles freak folk legend. A quickie. But this is a last minute thing, too, waking up about six that. At each spot, I am finding somebody local to share the gig, which is the punk logistics. Of course, everybody has the same complaint. But when the amount
of the fevered punk scene in early 1980s Austin, Texas is where it weeks ago and going, “God damn, nothing is happening,” feeling like it’s been a year DIY touring model that makes sense and continues to work. On the other hand of effort and time that you put into the artwork is about five percent of your total
all began, with indelible photographs of everyone from the Butthole banging my head against the wall trying to get The Texas Punk Problem published. it’s experiential. When I look at a picture, I’ve got some music in my head. There’s economic output, it’s like, wow man, if I could only work at ten percent. An hour and a
Surfers to the Stinky Shits to Toxic Shock featured in the incomparable I’ve travelled with a lot of these photos before, this checkerboard wall thing. The first a soundtrack I’m thinking of or feeling, or using as compositional form, so why not half a day instead of forty-five minutes.
hand-sewn The Western Roundup. Consequently, he segued into an time I used that was in 1995 and some of the older prints I’ve got are the ones from have that when people are looking at the pictures live? And why not have that be
exploration of the then-disappearing railroad hobo world, the heirs to then. You can tell because they’re really beat-up, but they’re going to have to go on different every night? But how you present it and take it on the road has become inextricably
the denizens of Jack Black’s You Can’t Win, resulting in Who is Bozo the wall because Tri-X Noise needs one hundred and twenty-eight photographs. A linked with the work. Is that a trap? Would you rather be sitting poolside
Texino?, which is justifiably known as “the greatest hobo graffiti film photo show with live performance. A lot of the recent tours have had photo as one Which vehicle is it on this tour? The van you were driving in 2010? sipping margaritas?
ever made.” A cultural anthropologist of the elusive underside of our part of their components. The Sonic Orphans tour in 2010 had 16mm films of lost No, that was my dear Toyota four-wheel drive. And then the E350 Diesel just No! Absolutely not. I’d just like to put more time into the work. But showing it this way
times who employs a hauntingly evocative black and white aesthetic, and found music films, and I had these prints, so I put them up too. became too much to repair. is part of it, and I believe that how you show it is part of the work.
his accomplishment lies in recorded facts presented with an almost
mystical ambiguity. To quote, in his own words, “No matter what the The one I saw in Detroit? The day we went to the Packard Plant, with That’s the one you drove from Braddock (Pennsylvania) to Danny’s Lot And the transition to the white cube can come with a whole new set
disappointment might be in finding the lonely reality behind a particular the films of the Avengers and Boy Problems? in Brooklyn to do the show at the dumpster pools in 2009? of problems and nuanced contradictions in the commercial sphere. If
myth or graffiti, there is a mystery, or truth, that will always evade the Yeah, an early Raul’s (Austin) era band, early 1980s. Billy Pringle’s first band. As far The diesel was the one I was going to drive, but it blew out the water pump the you were to show in that kind of environment, would you want it to be
documentarian and the audience.” He has carved out an unmistakable as the name Tri-X Noise, it could be, “Bill, I thought it was a website, I thought it was a moment I got on the freeway. So I had to double back and get the orange van, which presented in a very clean, orderly fashion, prints framed on the wall
domain including his own films, salvaged cinematic artifacts presented Big Cartel store,” but it’s just a catchall name. The title can apply to a lot of different I hadn’t driven in months and had rust in the tank that clogged the fuel filter on the just so, or replicate what you are doing out on the road?
in unusual locations (junkyards) projected on unlikely surfaces (sails), projects. Sunset Scavenger was the same way; I find a title I like and it represents a way. It was leaking oil and when I hit the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel they signaled I like both things. For me the work has to be viable in both contexts. The idea for next
and with printed matter, including Mostly True, The Zone System, group of ideas, not necessarily a specific configuration. me over to the bomb squad area and those guys were just like, “Are you kidding? year is to take this thing around to cleaner art spaces, but it comes with the same
and Tri-X-Noise, Volume One coming out on Radio Raheem in the spring No way! You’re not getting in the tunnel with this thing, it’s going to blow up.” It was extension cords. No museum extension cords, you know? No museum lights, no
of 2015. If that wasn’t enough, it’s Daniel’s gung-ho determination to Is Tri-X Noise all Austin punk pictures? leaking a lot of oil. wall labels. It comes whole.
take his artwork to the people—crisscrossing the nation, showing in No, but we sell the punk, because people want to see pictures of The Misfits, though
often off-the-beaten-path and sometimes-improbable venues—that when they show up they get to see pictures of a house show in Shreveport and that But you made it to Brooklyn eventually. Tell me about Garry Winogrand and Texas punk.
consolidates his achievement into a singular and all-encompassing sneaks into the viewer’s consciousness. But it’s really The Misfits that draw. They’re Late, but I did. I had to. I have a theory that goes like this: Texas punk was informed by the presence of
work of art and life. at the top of the marquee. Garry Winogrand in the art department at the University of Texas in Austin in the
78 [SFAQ Issue 19] 79 [SFAQ Issue 19]
No. I never saw any. But in the last twenty years there have been multiple new It devalues the individual photo, obviously, in the digital platforms
waves. The initial thing started in the early ‘90s. we’re talking about. You see it in a moment, but then it moves down the
line and is gone. Do you find yourself out of sync, or think you have to
Where’d that come from? adapt?
It was a cultural inevitability. The trains are there and they beg to be ridden and Well, they’re kind of gratifying, putting them up in a way, but really it’s a task I have to
certain people are begging to get out of the house and not sleep inside. Especially in do for marketing purposes. It’s kind of fun, but I’d rather not do it. It’s time consuming
this country, driving east to west, every motel backs up to the train tracks and every and distracting. Really, I have to learn another app? Another password? Is it the right
train calls your name. All of it is a continuation and every step along the way is equally amount of time that’s gone by for me to put up another Instagram picture? No, I’m
legit but also equally legit is building on this falsified myth, and it has been since the about three days behind on posting. That’s commercial suicide, and I’m trying to
get-go. You know, at the turn of the century it was a really popular subject and there make a living. So to make a living I have to put up an Instagram every day. It’s kind
was all this mainstream pulp literature about it and it was in the vernacular. But this of fun, but I don’t have to time to fool around with it. Of all the things to do with the
mechanism of exploitation is part of it. day, that’s one that’s way low on the list. It’s absurd that’s what it requires, but I have
to do it.
What about in practical terms? There are a lot fewer wooden boxcars
now and there has been the rise of containerization. Back to the antediluvian age, were the first pictures you took at Raul’s?
That’s true, but that turns out to be the least of it. Really the problem is the security 1981, then 1982 at The Ritz on Sixth Street.
state. That’s not only a problem for riding trains but for everything. You used to wave
at people at crossings and they’d either wave back or shake their fists at you, though Why are people so interested in that time now, over thirty years later,
they couldn’t do anything about it. But now they call on their cell phone or whatever. including many people that weren’t alive then?
And once those buildings in New York went down, everybody, citizen and cop alike, Well, one answer to that is it’s really sad. “What happened? Why aren’t people doing
Twist, Ozol, California, April, 1994. Courtesy of the artist.
wanted to be a hero. Poor rail fans couldn’t take pictures of bridges anymore. things?” It was an interesting time, sure, but where is the next thing? A lot of stuff did
happen after, and I think the most interesting and crucial is the radical environmental
Ok, you’re a salvage ethnologist, you’ve got folk art, and then you’ve, movement, and punk/traveler types, and the whole W.T.O., and Occupy, and all of
got in the last fifteen years the ascent of what is most often called that comes out of the same impetus of the ‘80s punk thing did. But the punk thing
“street art.” Do these two things have anything to do with each other? was rock and roll, and rock and roll is inherently sexy and fun, not so much do-
Monikers and street art? gooderism. In some ways punk carried a positive activist message, but essentially
it was rock and roll. So what we don’t have now is a rock and roll version of fuck the
Yes, graffiti going back to Lascaux, and on trains in New York in the state, fuck capital. Fuck capital now seems like a more serious undertaking and it’s
1970s, and the whole train, ship, or even on a tree kind of expression. not as fun.
On the other end, recently, something else cluttering up the streets,
an overabundance of not only illegal but also sanctioned “street” art. But those movements don’t have a soundtrack. And Occupy didn’t
In some districts. Where I live in Pasadena, Texas, there is zero graffiti. I found one, come up with a cultural effusion or produce something like punk and it
well, some, under a bridge, some swastikas and penises. didn’t even have much of a “look.”
Which is probably a good thing.
Back to the basics.
These kids do not get Juxtapoz magazine, but if they get a can of paint, and they get The encrustation is strange to me, the sixteen year-old kid dressed up
under a bridge, you know what comes out. in the Crass uniform of thirty years ago, to a T, sartorially immaculate
but historically and contextually unmoored.
What I’m talking about is validated graffiti vs. renegade graffiti. Are That’s just where we are evolutionarily as a species. Our media culture just exploded
they related? Does one come out of another? You’ve got monikers, at that point and the whole thing became much more complex. Before, there was a
and, here I’m quoting from the editorial at the beginning of Mostly True, monolith of corporate rock and that was smashed, in a way, though the power is still
you’ve got “put-ons and art scene fakery.” there. Culturally, things became much more atomized, which is a good thing. Now it’s
Well, you know, that’s the “editor.” That wasn’t me. I was in the role of the editor. And I difficult to know what to rally around; then it seemed like a simple us vs. them. You’re
Reminisce and environment, SOMA, SF, circa 1993. Courtesy of the artist. Bill Daniel Installing Tri-X-Noise, Fort Houston, Nashville, TN, December, 2014. Photograph by
Lila Lee. Courtesy of the artist. like that guy, and I mostly agree with him. But yeah, for sure. a punk, I’m a punk, and we’re on the same team. Now there are a million teams.
So where does genuine, for lack of a better word, mark making and You can be a punk one day, a raver the next, then rockabilly on Friday.
late 1970s, where a whole bunch of the kids were starting bands and studying with Speaking of that era, describe what was going on at the Pflugerville
monikering fall in that huge art-money-sanctioned, public projects It’s odd, at the very least, this institutionalization of the punk look
him. Tim Kerr (later of The Big Boys), Steve Marsh (who formed Terminal Mind), Tom [skating] ditch circa 1980.
world out there? Or where doesn’t it? broken down into highly specific subsets. Crusty jugglers. Why do they
Huckabee (the drummer of The Huns), and others. I’ve got a pet curatorial project Pflugerville was the spot. It was an example of public infrastructure that was there
That’s the swastikas and penises I found under that bridge in Pasadena. It’s going all have dogs, Bill? That’s what I want to know.
that is the work of the students of Garry Winogrand from when he taught at U.T.: for the taking where you were going to create your whole deal around it and not be
to come out, and when it comes out in a complete vacuum it’s probably more ‘Cuz it helps you spange.
painters, photographers, script writers. Tom Huckabee became a great storyteller bothered and live as if the ditch was made specifically for you. Generally no hassles.
interesting and a pure impulse. A destructive, juvenile impulse.
and filmmaker who teaches script writing in Fort Worth. Like The Huns’ bust at It was out in the country then, but now Dell Computers is there and it’s really built
I heard you say the other night that you’ve gone back to being interested
Raul’s. up and the ditch is under dirt. We think that they just filled it up and that it’s still there.
To cite the eminently quotable editor again, “But we have since found in figures—figures in motion. In the photos of skating and punk from
ourselves in an era of such suffocating media saturation and heretofore the early ‘80s that’s very much there, but now?
What was The Huns’ bust? Like the Buena Vista pool near Santa Cruz that has been filled in with
unmatched mindless rapidity of communication that the aggregate Yes. Skateboarding is just a way of creating figurative gestures, and I love board
That was the big bang in the universe of Texas punk. The Huns were arrested dirt and dug out multiple times over the years. So, where do you get
effect of the once generous act of information sharing has become like dynamics, too—how boards work mechanically and the physics of skating and the
onstage at Raul’s by officer Steve Bridgewater who, we find out years later, was your Tri-X film?
the wind—a hurricane to take refuge from.” interaction with the human body. You could say that skating is a kind of choreography
actually a closeted aspiring actor. Tom, a few months before the bust, was making Freestyle Photographic Supplies in LA. Kodak reformulated it about twenty years
Instagram, Facebook, exactly. Too many pictures, make it stop. that is performed to be photographed.
a film called The Death of Jim Morrison and they were filming down on Sixth Street, ago and maybe took some chromium out, so possibly it looks a little bit different, but
just running with no permits or anything. A cop came up and said, “What the hell are it still acts like it’s supposed to.
But you can’t. With skating you have published a number of bail shots, which are
you doing,” and they said, “We’re shooting a film, the guy in the gutter is not really
Well actually my phone got swamped at what I call Cell Phone Beach at the ship usually verboten.
dead, he’s supposed to be Jim Morrison. And we need a cop in the shot, so could You started documenting the hobo graffiti train scene more than
channel, so I didn’t have a cell phone for two weeks, and it was fantastic! I saw a lot Well, partly, I have a lot of bail shots because people were bailing a lot. And bailing
you stand over here?” He played along and was in the movie. So at The Huns’ show twenty years ago?
less images in those two weeks and the image processors in my brain finally got a shots are the ones that started to look more like the slam dancing pictures.
when the same officer Steve Bridgewater walked into Raul’s Club, on some level he Well Bozo Texino started as a still project in 1983, and then I started shooting film in
break.
recognized that this was a performance he was in, and performed the arresting cop ‘88.
Like when you first saw the back cover photo by Ed Colver on Wasted
role.
There are a billion more every day. How do you make one image that Youth’s Reagan’s In LP with the guy flipping off the speakers upside
Going back that far, was part of the impetus to record a subculture that
stands out? Actually, it’s more about the dissemination. That’s what down with Vans on, and it was totally skating. It was a skate trick. Are
What was the supposed crime The Huns were perpetrating? was disappearing?
has changed. Garry Winogrand took as many pictures as someone on you taking pictures of skaters now?
Might have been a noise complaint but really the Austin police were gunning for Salvage ethnography, that’s what I’d call it. What’s great about the whole subject of
Instagram today, but he didn’t print them, or even develop them all. It’s No, but about six years ago I started shooting 35mm stills again and got a Nikon with
Raul’s because of full-male nudity on posters on the drag [Guadalupe Street] for American hoboing is that it’s a giant plastic myth that you can attach yourself to and
not so much that it wasn’t possible to take so many pictures before, it’s a 28mm lens and a Sunpak flash, which was basically the same thing I was using in
punk shows there. I’m sure once they walked in and saw what was going on they spin it out for whatever story you need to tell.
that the one-to-one relationship—a zine, a print, or even the one-to- ’82—same film stock, same developer, same 72-degree water with the film sitting
thought, “We’ve got a big fish here, we’re going to land this.” If you’re a cop, and it’s
one of a few of emails—has been supplanted by the one-to-the-rest- there for eleven minutes. It’s amazing how things can still be the same even though
just boredom, boredom, boredom, and then you get to bust up a punk show, it’s like, There’s a whole new crop of people interested in that, a younger
of-the-world. Do you have anything profound to say about that? technology has changed so much. Like charcoal and a piece of paper. I wanted to
“This is heroics, this is a poetic moment in which we can live out our role.” Not just generation of train hoppers, like Brad Westcott, who makes the zine
All day long, when I’m driving, to myself. Sure I think about that and ask hard get back to that, to shooting some art events, some music shows, but, you know,
stopping kids from driving too fast but really getting to the core. Never Heard of It, or Mike Brodie, to use a more notorious example,
questions, like why would I burden the world with another picture? Does the world really unlikely music shows.
who are interested in this folkloric tradition. When you started, were
want another picture? No. I think long and hard about that: am I going to ask people
there many young guys or girls riding trains?
to look at another picture?
80 [SFAQ Issue 19] 81 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Singalong during a performance by The Mel Coolies, Liberty Hall, Dallas, February 26th, 1984.
Kenny Peyton, Flowmotion Skatepark, South Austin, Texas, 1981. Courtesy of the artist.
As opposed to the likely shows in the likely venues. It’s also strange to Who you know from living in San Francisco through his film series Point taken, though there’s still a contradiction inherent in your work. A You’re immersed in the practical side of your craft, the lenses, the
me how you go to these places, like this show at a squat I went to in Other Cinema. You worked on his films? good one that shows there’s this wasteful advanced capitalist society cameras . . .
Switzerland back in April, and it was packed in this basement and really Tribulation 99—that was the first film I worked on with Craig, and it takes the form and, on the other hand, your tools—the camera and the truck—are part I know, it’s horrendously unfashionable, and I think it’s important to recognize that. I
jolly and there was a band with a good girl singer screaming, but it was of a right-wing paranoid rant, a tract, and a lot of Craig’s films are built on an inverted of that. mean, look what’s in the art world.
like, where’s the danger? Everyone is hugging. What’s up with that? metaphor. They’re falling into the ventriloquism of a counter-side. Like, he would tell That they’re part of civilization? Of course they are. And Al Gore flies in Learjets and
Everyone’s all friends. There wasn’t going to be a fight. the history of American interventionism in Central America from a crazy right-wing lives in giant mansions with climate control. Well there’s that. But the cameras, the trucks, the vans, there’s a very
Well if you want fights there are plenty of opportunities at the liquor store right perspective rather than from a liberal one. You can take a style from an object, and nuts-and-bolts gearhead side to what you do, but it’s superlative as
around the corner or on the streets of downtown Tucson. Half the people there will it’s also—looking for a voice. The editorial voice of Mostly True is a funny guy with a That’s more problematic than you driving a four-cylinder truck. art because that’s all there but it’s not about the zone system or like
oblige you. pipe. It’s like, “I know that guy!” Maybe. a Hollywood movie in which the CGI wows you but it’s empty. I don’t
see your photographs and think about what lens you used, though
True. So, in The Western Roundup, the zine you made in the early Who did all the ads, the make-believe ones? There are levels, degrees involved. obviously that’s critical. Is it important to you that the viewer in the end
1980s, and much more recently in the Mostly True book, there is a very All of us. The design team was Gary Fogelson, Phil Lubliner, and Rich McIsaac, all Yeah, like driving here with a headwind, and the fastest I could go is 62 miles per hour is not aware of the how it was made? Or should they be aware of the
distinct reliance and incorporation of historical graphic motifs. in Brooklyn. There was a fortunate like-mindedness at work. Everybody got it and because my truck has roughly the engine displacement of a motorcycle. technical prowess?
That all comes from Mike Nott, who was the designer for The Western Roundup. everybody shared in making the voice feel right. The second edition also had some No, the most important thing is that they should stand in front of it and fall into it and
They were my photos, but Mike was the designer. He was a great poster designer design help from Eric Kneeland and Mike Enron. There’s a very substantial technical foundation to your photography, in we just see their feet disappear into the picture.
too. He’d write “NOXX” on them instead of “Nott.” the old-fashioned sense. Is that aspect not necessarily something you
All right, so you’re stranded on a desert island and you can only bring want to trumpet?
They’re almost seamless. The Western Roundup looks like it could be a one movie. Is it Robert Frank and Rudy Wurlitzer’s Energy and How to Oh, no, I’ll talk all day long about that. But it’s both photo technical and just pictorial.
real 1950s dude ranch pamphlet, albeit with pictures of the Bad Brains, Get It, or Les Blank’s Burden of Dreams? And it’s crucial that it’s both. In the content-and-form-relationship, the form is made
and Mostly True really does look like it could have been published in For that it might be something with fewer words involved—Bergman or something. with something, and that form is an output of a tool. Photography is of course super
1908. Something that would take on a religious deal. But Burden of Dreams, that’s geeky and a lot of people in photography are obsessed with just the tools. And that’s
It’s a form of mimicry, but the point is to get an object-metaphor to work from. something I could watch over and over. groovy, I love the tools. But what do they make? Certain tools make certain things
It’s not supposed to be a replication of the original but I have to have a visualization and then it’s about what these things embody. I feel like tools with a high degree of
to attach things to; a template. The style came from Mike. We were all on board, for You are obviously interested in peak oil and its aftermath, the Sausalito automation make work that feels disembodied.
sure, but that was his deal. I can tell you who else I learned how to operate an object houseboat scene, the coming breakdown, but at the same time you’re
metaphor from, and that’s Craig Baldwin. driving a truck and putting gas in it. To speak plainly, there’s often form with no content.
It’s a four-cylinder. I’m no less obsessed with my tonal scale than Ansel Adams was. I hope at some
point to do an interview in which I only talk about the grayscale.
Jacqueline (Macbook), 2014. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist. Hands (Pink Bathroom), 2010. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
In Conversation With Pat McCarthy You’ve had a super crazy year. At the beginning of the year you curated
the PussyPat show at Muddguts, and that’s where I (and lots of other
How has shooting commercial and fashion work challenged your pho-
tography? Like a studio photo shoot for instance?
He’s overwhelmingly pretty so that probably eases the transition.
Yeah, he’s insane looking. I met him when I went on Ryan McGinley’s road trip with
Petra Collins is committed and crushing it. In 2014 she staged solo ex- people in New York) really first saw the scale of your vision. It felt like a Something I love to do, but I’ve always—I mean, I just have to do it for money to live. my other best friend, which is cool.
hibitions of photographs and sculptures, routinely curated all-female whole scene really declared itself. You organized 24 artists, you had a But I don’t know, I’m really lucky now I’m at this point, and I think I was lucky in the
group shows, put out major editorial and commercial projects, made manifesto, and it seemed like from the onset the community has been beginning, where my creative direction wasn’t really challenged, and I do have more Yeah. You seemingly earned your education through old-fashioned ap-
a monograph, and recently began making her first short films. At 22 an integral ingredient in your work. I’m wondering if that was deliber- space to do what I want. Every kind of job that I’ve done I’ve sort of had that, which prenticeship as opposed to art college. Do you feel that kind of men-
years old, this manic output demands recognition as a leader among a ately cultivated, or did it happen more by circumstance? is cool, which is kind of rare. So I guess I have kind of a unique experience doing it, tor/protégé style of learning has been crucial to your fast and super
generation of young artists who are socially minded and comfortable I guess it was deliberate because that’s kind of what I’ve been doing my whole life. I but even when I do fashion editorial work, it’s really on my own terms. I just did this prolific output?
creating across many platforms at once. Like Kern she attacks present guess when I started off really creating, doing photography, and other—I was danc- shoot in i-D a couple issues ago that I really love which was just of my two of my I mean—I don’t know—I did go to school for two years, which cost a lot, but I didn’t
taboos. Like McGinley her work is candid and fantastic. And like Rihan- ing and did video and stuff before that, but I kind of, like, didn’t really see a place or best friends who did this really awesome clothing line and I shot a bunch of best really go for photography. I have been making art since I was little; it’s just something
na, if she ain’t feelin’ it, she ain’t doin’ it. platform for my work so I just kind of wanted to create that for other young—not friends. But it was girls ranging from every different kind of look and size and shape I need to do, so nothing ever really stopped me. Having mentors or people to work
even young, but other talented female artists like myself. I guess just doing that show and whatever, and so I’m lucky that I get to do that as opposed to having to stick to with is really helpful for me, because working with people is kind of the only way I
I have like a dozen questions, or something. And also thank you for was a natural progression. I actually did one before that in September. I forget what normal commercial work. Sometimes it is draining, but then I just have to remember can do things. I’m really happy that I did get an education. I would love to go back
doing this and stuff. Have you read SFAQ? month PussyPat was. March or something? the money goes to making more artwork. So it’s totally cool, fine for me. to school; I just don’t have time or money. It’s unfortunate that school is so expen-
I was just about to do it, yeah. sive, especially in the U.S. I’m from Canada—it’s cheaper there—but it’s so expen-
March, around the same time you did your solo show at Capricious 88. Does being put into that situation bring out unexpected directions in sive here that I just, I don’t know. And I think it’s doing apprenticeships and stuff is
It’s really the best. It’s published in San Francisco, it’s completely free, Yeah, yeah, March. But I did this show in September actually. I don’t know if you saw your work? the route that some people have to take, but I think learning from other people and
and it goes to like a hundred cities in the world. Yeah, and I’m not really it. It was called Gynolandscape. Along with my photography, curating is really im- Yeah, usually I barely shoot in the studio. When I shot Tavi for the cover of Nylon, I working with other people is really important. Does that answer your question kind
a journalist. portant to me, and actually I went to school for two years for criticism in curatorial got to buy backdrops, which I wouldn’t normally buy for myself. I don’t know—I don’t of?
I know, it’s really weird interviewing people. I just did it for the first time recently. practice, and I guess in my practice I find it really important to collaborate. It’s just shoot studio and I also wouldn’t spend the extra money on it, but I kind of realized
something I love to do. a new work I wanted to do out of it, so I used it as a resource to try out new things. Totally. Richard Kern and Ryan McGinley are really known for working
Who did you interview? Someone you knew? in the field, like endless travel and constantly working in new locations.
I spent like ten days traveling around the U.S. and shot a little documentary about I think the Muddguts show seemed more impactful because it was at An obvious change in the commercial work is you’re shooting some Has that strongly influenced your development of a practice?
girls who practice dance. My sister and I were interviewing girls, but it was my first an underground gallery, more like a show for our immediate generation boys as subjects. Yeah. I first modeled for Ryan 2 years ago in May 2013.
time doing that. It was so cool. I did something else like that before on video, so I just and artists our age. I haven’t shot too many boys.
started interviewing. Yeah, totally, yeah. I always think that’s super important to do, because as an artist Where did you guys go?
you’re always kind of preaching to the choir, so I find it important to do. Also, working But you have lots of photos of that really dreamy boy, Michael [Bai- We went from New York to Oklahoma. We drove through the Appalachians and
Are you super used to being interviewed yourself at this point? with brands and doing more mainstream things is necessary if you really want to ley-Gates]. down the east coast. But I mean, it was really important for me to experience that
Yeah, I am. I used to get super nervous, but now I’m used to it. I also really like talking, change things, because if you just stay in your little art world bubble you’re just going Oh yeah, Mike. Mike’s a really good friend of mine, and he’s also a super talented art- kind of work ethic and lifestyle. He’s so lucky to be able to do that—to just do what
so it’s easy for me. to, like . . . you’re only going to reach wealthy art people. You’re not going to reach ist, so I guess I don’t even think of—I don’t know—I love him so much as a person he loves every single day. And when I came back I was like, that’s what I need to do
the public, who my art is actually for. Yeah, doing it at Muddguts was super cool, and that I totally overlooked that, but yeah, I shot Mike a bunch of times. I guess it’s the and what I would love to do. And I actually kind of just did that. I was away for a month.
those are venues I really like working with. same as shooting any girl! Because I’m so close to him—it’s natural for me. I went on a little road trip from New Orleans to Las Vegas.
84 [SFAQ Issue 19]
India Drive at Night, 2014. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist. Jacqueline Text, 2014. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
How did you travel? Okay, there is this one Ira Glass quote that I really like that goes something like: “It’s think a lot of feminism has gone into the mainstream, and I think that’s why we see it Yeah, I definitely want to do more of that. I have always been a multimedia artist. Pho-
We drove. I didn’t drive because I don’t have my license, but my sister and I are doing easy to give up, but don’t give up after your first try.” so much in art. I don’t know, I think it’s really exciting, and I think a lot of girls are getting tography was just the thing that I just did most, so now I’m finally getting a chance to
a little documentary about young girls in dance. She is practicing as a dance teacher a chance to do what they want. So this year has been kind of crazy for that. move back into doing more. It has to do with time and space and money to be able
and I used to—before I did photography I was set on being a dancer, it’s what I want- Like, don’t give up after failing? to create sculpture. Photography was definitely the easiest and fastest and needed
ed to do. But I had a really bad injury and have weird things with my kneecaps so I Yeah! Yeah, don’t give up after failing. Because failing is the most important thing. Do you see yourself as part of or as contributing to the lineage of fem- the least amount of space to do. But yeah, I love neon because it’s such a weird old
had to stop dancing, but it wasn’t my choice. I was told by doctors to stop dancing, How you act after you fail for the first time is what determines what your career will inism? medium, and it’s usually used to sell things, which is interesting. Neon for me is the
which was really intense for me, and I didn’t realize how intense until this trip. So I had be like. If you stop doing what you do . . . I don’t know, you can’t give up. But that’s kind Oh yeah, I think I grew up in this fourth wave. And my approach, and others’ like Tavi, store signs or signs for strip clubs or whatever, and what I really like is taking that me-
a film crew filming and I was also taking photos and we were both interviewing girls of cheesy. Do what you want to do! And keep doing it until you can do it for the rest have a different approach than third-wave feminism, so I think it’s just natural for that dium and putting my sort of 21st century girl experience into it. For me it creates this
and it was really amazing. To travel and work is what I love to do. of your life, yeah. It’s always weird for me to talk about this because I’ve been making to happen. Yeah, I think so. I also grew up with the Internet and all these different weird, confusing thing when I put a really sad text message or certain Rihanna lyrics
art since I was really young, so it’s hard for me to put in words—it’s something that I tools, so I think it’s definitely a fourth wave, for sure, and I think I’m part of it. into this medium that already has so much meaning behind it. Neon is super weird
It seems apprenticing with two artists who are real-deal directors must physically need to do, and I feel like that’s what it’s like for a lot of people. It’s hard for and romantic. So it’s exciting to put my own things in it. I guess it has a lot to do with
have rubbed off on you. Is how to be a director not taught in school? me to separate it as something that you really try to do, but I guess that goes with not Do you see your work exploring feminist issues politically, socially, seeing myself in a landscape, or seeing other girls. I always think of this one—I refer
Yeah, it’s cool to see, I mean, it’s so important to learn how to be in charge of a team. stopping, and also not letting things stop you. I didn’t grow up with a lot of money, so aesthetically, or culturally? to this so much, but it was just the most impactful for me—this Virginia Woolf essay
I got a job, I got this shitty retail job, and I spent all my money on film and developing. I It’s all kind of one big thing. I mean my work just comes from—I guess the way I see called The Three Guineas, where—have you read it?
Leader. did it all the time, until now, where I’m privileged enough to do it as my career. the world is through a feminist lens so whatever I shoot has that. But it doesn’t mean
Yeah, to be the leader. I just shot the documentary, but before that I shot this little I’m always thinking of what radical art thing can I do to make something crazy; it’s just No, I haven’t.
art film for Dazed that is—I don’t know if I can talk about it, but I think it’s coming out Do you feel like you have more control or choice over what the direc- the way I think normally. I totally forgot what the question was! Well, the essay is about this soldier, this man, who’s writing to a woman—I don’t know
soon. Basically. Aaron Rose was chosen to shoot something about the New York tion of your art is now? if it’s necessarily Virginia Woolf—and he’s asking her why we have war and what he
art scene and I was chosen to shoot something about the LA art scene. I don’t know Yeah, for sure. I definitely do. Yeah, I think I always have because it’s just so much a It was if any one of these things are more important in your work— can do to stop war. He doesn’t understand the purpose of it, and I read this so long
if I’m allowed to talk about it yet—when does this interview come out? part of me that it just has to—if it’s not my choice then it’s not me and then it totally dealing with the issues politically or socially . . . ago, but maybe he also felt, like, what can women do? The thing that stuck out most
defeats the purpose. So I think I have total control, yeah. Yeah, it’s just like all one big thing. in my mind is when she explains that women don’t create war because they were
I think kind of super soon. never part of that landscape. They could never vote and they never had human
Okay, maybe not. What do you think about the evolution of feminism in art and where do So much of your subject matter has to do with a young/teenage aes- rights or a public voice, so they don’t have this nationalistic view of things. There’s
you see it standing now? thetic. As you become more of a woman and less of a teen has it this other quote that I really love, it’s from a documentary called Miss Representation,
You’ll totally see it before it comes out. I think this year has been really awesome. There’s also been a lot of shitty things, but changed your ideas or perspective about the subject matter? which is from four years ago about women in the media, and this one woman says
Oh, yeah. So I went from that and then straight into ten days of shooting this docu- it’s been a big year for feminism and civil rights, and I think while filming this, the doc- It totally has, I can see it. I just put out a book of the past years of photography after in it that “you can’t be what you can’t see.” But anyway, back to the neon, and back
mentary and I guess I really—with my photography I’m not always having to boss a umentary I just shot—I always knew there was change in the air from all the things I my first show and I could really see the progression of my work. I don’t know what to creating movies and stuff. It’s exciting to see myself in these old things that I would
big crew around or whatever, because it’s just usually me and the model. This was saw—we met with a bunch of girls from all over, from different socioeconomic back- that will hold for the future, but I just know as I grow I have a better perspective. I look never be a part of. I mean, I kind of did the same thing when I was shooting this doc-
kind of the first time where I really had to be in charge and seeing Ryan and Richard grounds, from whatever, and girls that have different awareness of things. Some back on my life and look back on what I was thinking at the time and the work I was umentary. I would always show the girls the monitor to show them what the footage
do it kind of helped with that. girls had no idea who I was and were so removed from art, but the thing that all of creating. But I don’t know what will happen in the future. Is that okay? looked like because it’s really amazing to see yourself in this medium that you don’t
them had in common was how empowered they were, which was really cool, and really see people like yourself in. Because we shot it with an amazing camera, it was
Because you very quickly went from being an apprentice to a men- which totally changed the direction of the questions that my sister and I were ask- And you’ve been making sculpture and curating performance. Do you movie quality and whatever. But yeah, long answer for a short question about sculp-
tor. Now you’re a big figure to many artists, especially young women. ing, because my sister and I grew up overthinking our bodies and ultimately hating see yourself doing more of these? And also, what attracts you to neon ture and stuff.
What’s the most fundamental advice you hope to pass on to younger ourselves and whatever, and seeing all these girls speak so positively about them- lights?
kids who are around shooting and creating? selves and about other girls just made me realize that things have changed. And I
86 [SFAQ Issue 19] 87 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Talvi Bra, 2011. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
Sad Sunset (Anna), 2013. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
Those are the best answers. Yeah, all of your work—the photos, ev- girls are making that have come up in the past year. I think it’s all this—not net art, but
erything—has a really cinematic vision to it. Last night I was o.d.-ing girls putting their work out on Tumblr and whatever. It’s really exciting because it’s
on your photos and in the middle of this really big collection from the this new platform and stage that doesn’t necessarily have to be in big money-driven
first Rookie Yearbook, there was a series of these portraits of a super galleries. So I think that’s the most important thing.
melancholic girl with pink hair. It must be from four or five years ago,
but some of the photos were subtitled and the subtitles really revealed Do you have anything you want to add on your own? Any questions I
these narratives in the photographs that maybe were hinted at, but should have asked?
were nowhere near as clear without. Do you often have a bigger ficti- I don’t know, I think you covered it pretty well, and I’m glad you didn’t ask all the ques-
tious story running through your mind when you’re shooting? tions I always get asked.
Not really, but I approach composing the image in a cinematic way. Before I did pho-
tography I really wanted to do film, but that’s something that, for a young person, is What are those?
really hard to do because of time and budget and crew. No, no, no. I know, we always talk about the future.
It’s the ultimate art. What does your future look like?
Totally, so I guess my approach for each photo is to get the most feeling and emotion Sometimes I get asked what I think about nudity or what I think about this or that.
and everything in this one take. I don’t necessarily have this other fictitious tale, but I Such tired, stupid subjects.
really put into them a lot of whatever emotion is in the room, or is in my subject, or is
in me, and it really comes out in the photo, and I think it really tells whatever is going Maybe ‘cause we’re sorta close in age so we have similar perspectives.
on at that time. Yeah, I think so. The difference between people who are older who interview me and
the things that they pick up is so funny. We’re all over nudity and over all of it, it’s like
What shows or artworks do you feel marked this past year? Were you not a second thought. But yeah, it’s really funny.
in Miami a couple weeks ago?
Yeah, I was in Miami. Actually, this is so crazy—I didn’t see anything there. I didn’t see It’s life after Ryan McGinley.
any of the artworks because I was working the whole time, and I was kind of stuck Yeah, exactly. I don’t think twice about a naked body, it’s just normal. I mean, espe-
where I was! I’m just going to be vague here because I can’t think of anything spe- cially since I spent three weeks, exclusively being naked doing this—sitting in a car
cific, but I think the most important thing in art this year was the DIY movement from naked, or like playing, I don’t know, whatever, Clue, naked. I don’t really care about it
young female artists. There are so many collectives and shows and art that all these at all.
Selfie (Aly), 2014. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
Selfie #1, 2014. Digital archival photograph. Courtesy of the artist.
Lee Mingwei Life, Memories, And The Art Of Participation
The Mending Project, 2009. Installation view, Lombard-Freid Projects, New York. In the collection of Rudy Tseng, Taipei. Photograph byAnita Kan. Courtesy of the Mori Art Museum, Japan. The Living Room, 2000. Installation view, A Quartet and A Living Room. Chinese Arts Centre, Manchester, U.K., 2013. Photograph by Kevin Ho. Courtesy of the Mori Art Museum, Japan.
By Gianni Simone The Mending Project the community, goes back to before 9/11 to when I was a weaver at California Col-
lege of the Arts. I truly believe that all my projects, and especially this one, are a way
The Sleeping Project
In the ancient Chinese creation myth, for example, Nüwa is the goddess who mend- to weave human psychology, social relationship, and memory together. The seed for this idea came when I was travelling between Paris and Prague after
The essence of Lee Mingwei’s art lies in the relationships between ed the sky when it was in danger of collapse. This said, mending for me is also a graduating from high school. I was sharing my sleeper-car train compartment with
people—family, friends, and complete strangers. Many of his works in- very personal thing because in Taiwan in the 1960s, the country was very poor so The Dining Project an elderly gentleman, and he was telling me about his family. They were all put into a
vite the viewer to take part by following simple instructions. Acts like we usually didn’t replace worn-out things with new ones: we used to repair them. concentration camp, including him, and after three years, when the survivors were
“giving” and “exchange” give rise to a relation centered on something This gesture of mending, and the fact that my mother would do it for me, brings me This project began when I was studying at Yale for my graduate program. When I liberated, he was the only one left. He told me about his life in the camp and his re-
invisible, prompting us to think about “trust” between ourselves and something emotionally satisfying. first arrived I felt kind of lost as I didn’t know anybody. I was both excited and anx- lationship with other people who were there. After a while he said he was tired and
another person. Indeed, Lee insists on not considering people or things ious about my new experience. I put out this message all over the campus inviting went to sleep. But I couldn’t sleep at all because of what I’d heard. I’d never heard
as individual, independent entities, calling instead attention to the lim- When you think about it, cloth is like a second skin for us, and even if you mend people to my place in order to have a conversation over a meal. At the end of the anything like that. That was the seed of the Sleeping Project. When I conceived the
inal space where they are intricately interconnected. Many of Lee’s something for a stranger, this is a kind of experience that is understood across the day I had about 45 calls on my machine asking me what it was all about. I ended up project in 2000, I wanted to create an environment that would be conducive to the
works make us rethink everyday activities like “walking,” “eating,” and border and naturally creates a human bond that transcends cultural barriers. It is cooking quite a few meals that year. I think every other day I had someone at my same kind of intimacy and human connection I had felt on that train many years be-
“sleeping.” Zen philosophy, which Lee encountered in his childhood, about care and giving a gift to somebody. So I was carrying all these feelings and place and my guests were all strangers. It worked this way: I would call these peo- fore. When installed, I requested that the museum design the sleeping space and
emphasizes being in the “here and now,” rather than being bound by memories and ideas inside myself that were just waiting to be used somehow, and ple ask about their dietary preferences, then go to the supermarket to get the fresh the furniture in such a way that the environment would be very comfortable, sooth-
doctrines and theories. It involves questioning our awareness of the the spark that gave me the final inspiration for the project was 9/11. My friend John’s ingredients I needed. By the time this person arrived, the meal would be ready and ing, and relaxing. One person is chosen, again through a lottery, and invited to share
minor actions and actual experiences that make up our daily lives. The office was in one of the towers and all 400 of his colleagues died. Luckily for him he we would share it together. When I moved this experience to a gallery environment, a “bedroom” with me for one night. The person will come around 9:00 pm and, once
Taiwan-born artist was in Tokyo for a big retrospective exhibition at was a little late that day and missed the destruction by just a few minutes. When he I took something that is familiar and put it into an unusual context that became a the gallery door closes, it is interesting to see how two strangers “dance through the
the Mori Art Museum, and he was kind enough to share his thoughts returned home he collected a few people while walking to 72nd Street. There were frame to re-examine this experience of dining. The way to participate is to fill out a night.” Of course, it’s important that there’s no sexual tension in this experience. This
on his art practice. Lee’s family history has been linked to Japan since so many people out in the street, looking completely lost, so he invited some of them lottery card with your name and phone number so we can contact you. If your card experience is not documented, which means the content of the conversations that
the 1920s when this country ruled over Taiwan, during which time his to stay with us. I remember that evening I did two very unusual things: I went to the is picked, all you have to do is arrive at the appointed time and be prepared to enjoy unfold are not be recorded or made public, but I ask each person in advance to bring
grandfather studied law at Meiji University in Tokyo while his grand- supermarket and bought all the cakes I could find and I started mending all the piec- the meal. I know that many people are going to ask if this can be called art and this something personal that they keep next to their bed; something like the books they
mother learned Western medicine at Tokyo Women’s Medical School. es of cloth that I always wanted to mend but never found the time to do. It took me is exactly what I want everybody to do with my work; to start questioning the idea are reading or the glass they are using for water, and leave this object with us for the
eight years to turn this experience into a project. I realized I could do this mending of art itself. There isn’t any documentation as I feel that any would pollute the expe- duration of the show.
The essence of my practice is very simple. It’s based on the idea of hospitality and for myself and for strangers. So this is the origin of the Mending Project. When you rience, so it’s a very ephemeral project. But it’s extremely important that it is a one-
trust, particularly between strangers. When people come to my exhibitions, they get come to the gallery, you should bring a piece of clothing that you want repaired. You on-one experience with a stranger. Imagine if I cook a meal for someone I know. The The Moving Garden
personally involved in my projects. So it’s not just looking at paintings or sculptures will find me or another person sitting at a table. We will ask your permission to bor- dynamic is going to be quite different.
or something else you can’t interact with. Many of my projects are based on your row it for the duration of the show because the piece of thread we will use will remain The Moving Garden was originally commissioned for the Lyon Biennale in 2009. It
kindness and understanding. Without your participation my works are meaningless. attached to the clothing on one side and the yarn wall on the other . Eventually, all was the first time I went to Lyon. When I travel I often take two books with me: one
these threads are going to create a big web. This connectivity, or connection with is Lewis Hyde’s The Gift and the other one is the Japanese classic The Pillow Book
This project was part of my first museum show at the Whitney in New York in 1998,
though it really began with my own experience of writing a letter to my grandmother
after she died. She is the person who, more than anybody else, has influenced me
spiritually, and in this letter I wrote the feelings of gratitude I wished I had expressed
to her before she passed away. The project itself is based on a very simple idea in-
volving letter-writing booths. There are three letter-writing booths. Each one refers
to a different posture of meditation in Chinese Buddhist practice: one is standing,
one is sitting, and one is kneeling. In each, is paper and pencils with which you can
hopefully write a letter of gratitude, forgiveness, or an apology that you were previ-
ously not able to express to someone. Once you are finished you have to put it into
an envelope that you are free to seal or leave open so that other people can read
it. Then you must leave it on the rack inside the booth. You may also want to add
the address of the person to whom you have written the letter, in which case we put
a stamp on and mail it for you. I’m providing an opportunity to change the relation
between you and the letter receiver, but more importantly the relationship between
you and yourself.
Guernica in Sand
This project deals mainly with the idea of impermanence. My partner and I took a
very long trip to Bolivia, and while we were travelling on a highland desert we were
suddenly caught in a sand storm that almost engulfed our car. I then realized that
though sand is so small, it comes from huge rocks and is a great medium to talk
about impermanence. This project is divided into three stages. In the first stage,
people can see this very large sand rendition of Picasso’s painting Guernica. I use
this painting and title because it is an iconic painting in Western art history that has The Moving Garden, 2009. Installation view of The 10th Lyon Biennale, Museum of Contem-
so much political weight. There is a tiny area with sand buckets and an unfinished porary Art, Lyon, France. In the collection of Amy & Leo Shih, Taichung. Photograph by Blaise
Adilon. Courtesy of the Mori Art Museum, Japan. The Dining Project, 1997. Installation view of Duologue. Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei, Taiwan, 2007. Collection of JUT Museum Pre-Opening Office, Taiwan.
94 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Photograph by Lee Studio. Courtesy of the Mori Art Museum, Japan.
Nicolas Lobo
In Conversation With Courtney Malick products and imagery. Is this something that you have also detected
as becoming more prevalent in art and discourse, and can you discuss
your own reasons for beginning this pursuit or why you feel it is be-
coming more of a “hot topic,” so to speak?
Nicolas Lobo is a Miami-based sculptor and installation artist who has Maybe it has to do with the rapid transmission of complex physical qualities. Zoloft
been working on conceptual, sometimes site-specific projects since and antifreeze: an emotional panacea; Neutrogena skin cream and generic nutri-
2006. Recently, however, he has been taking his sensory-imbued prac- tional supplement powder: a body-image crisis, etc. Although materials like these
tice to new depths by creating work that not only engages in a conver- are having a moment I think they really have a lineage that supports their use in his-
sation with itself through its construction, but also relates directly to torical tradition. I’m thinking of Sigmar Polke, Dieter Roth, and Paul McCarthy, for ex-
industries and economies parallel to art discourse that rarely enter into ample. When I look at it this way, the idea of an apocryphal material as a conceptual
it so distinctly. In his two-week solo exhibition at Gallery Diet in Miami container is more present in culture as a whole. Maybe this works in counterpoint to
in March 2014, Bad Soda / Soft Drunk, Lobo juxtaposed a grouping the virtual, post-Internet idea that has also been circulating recently; a vague notion
of what one might at first glance consider to be relatively formal, even caused by viral brand awareness, industrial agriculture, pharmaceutical marketing,
classically contemporary bulbous sculptures that evoke Chinese schol- and so on that the non-virtual is still here, but it’s getting kind of complicated.
ar’s stones with a precarious floor installation that created an entirely
new “floor” for the space. Installation shots of the show hardly begin to Right, and seemingly that complication is at least in part because they
convey the story that is being told within. The lumpy, dimply sculptures are somehow blending, or the differentiation between the non-virtual
that awkwardly rest atop subtly patterned square columns are in fact and the virtual is narrowing significantly. With Bad Soda / Soft Drunk,
created through the process of making napalm. Perhaps even more you filled a Miami gallery with thousands of old, dead stock bottles of
alarming is the relatively simple process through which such a devas- Nexcite and created a sculptural “floor” upon which viewers had to
tating material is conjured, by pouring gasoline over blocks of polysty- carefully walk. You also included sculptures created by making your
rene, a common plastic used for mass-product packaging. To further own DIY napalm, some of which were then colored with the blue Nex-
complicate things, these forms that result in the burning away of plas- cite. I am wondering if this process in and of itself was meant in some
tic are then set with one of the most innocent of children’s delights: way to serve as a kind of narrative that the show as a whole projects?
Play-Doh, a staple in family homes since the 1950s. The contradictions Process as narrative is something that I’m okay with. There are so many phases to
set into motion by the marriage of these products, repurposed as ar- any presentation it would be a shame to underplay the importance of the process.
tistic materials, brings back those unforgettable words of Marshall Mc- In fact, I’m working on an upcoming project in which the process is even more fore-
Luhan. It seems as though whether or not the medium here truly is the grounded. I think in terms of exhibitions as temporary breaks in ongoing activities.
message, or is at least one of several messages, it is impossible not to
consider it as both the forefront and the backbone of such a seemingly When I was making the Bad Soda / Soft Drunk show I was seeing the elements as
unthreatening sculpture. temporary states, agglomerations of products designed for the skin, tools for tactile
contemplation, extreme physical violence, and sensual awareness. When com-
The newly fabricated floor of the gallery likewise brings ingestible and bined they inform each other but also call attention to the idea that they are made of
common yet chemically based products into question—or perhaps an other products, which are in turn made from other products. Napalm is gasoline and
odd celebration. From wall to wall the floor of the gallery was filled with polystyrene—gasoline is refined petroleum, and polystyrene is a collection of var-
unopened, plastic-wrapped, dead-stock 24-packs of a little-known ious engineered molecules in the styrene family. As you start to look further down
Swedish energy drink called Nexcite that boasts the bonus property the chain these things start to change shape pretty aggressively. I’m thinking of the
of also being an aphrodisiac, particularly for women. It is also notable human body as a kind of hub through which these various commodities pass before
that Nexcite was originally named Niagara to rhyme with Viagra, which moving on to other forms, states, and effects.
later lead to a lawsuit. Nexcite’s notably Windex-blue coloring warns
that there is obviously no telling what has been put into the drink to Yes, certainly it is clear that a lineage of some kind is being either Niagara, 2014. Stop motion animation and digital file. Image courtesy of the artist and Gallery Diet.
make you not only energized but exceptionally horny! Visitors had to formed or followed, or in some way is doing both at once. Since there
walk on top of this “flooring” to get from sculpture to sculpture, while is a drastic dichotomy at the crux of this body of work that simultane-
in an adjoining minimal room plays a video titled Niagara (2014) of Nex- ously produces playful, colorful sculptures that are made up of toxic,
cite being poured on the sculptures, coloring them that bright, artificial chemically modified products that are manufactured for less-than-
blue hue. The absurdity and happenstance that Lobo had even found That’s a good point, It’s rare to get outside of existing ideas and meanings. Especial- exotic new ones for fractions of a second. Of course the new elements are impracti-
playful, innocent purposes, I am curious as to what story, if any, the
such a large quantity of Nexcite sitting in a warehouse in an industrial ly in a knowledge-economy where everything is named, categorized, and photo- cal because of their extremely short duration. Similar to when something complete-
marriage of these two extremes may tell?
area of Miami is prologue enough to begin the complex and infectious graphed. What do you think about gravitating towards liminal materials? When I say ly unfamiliar is apprehended, language rushes up to envelop it and fill the void. It’s a
When I choose to use napalm, I am interested in it because most people know what
ways that this set of works come together to create this particular and liminal materials I mean things that are on the fringe of collective knowledge—exotic funny thing, by trying to escape language we are generating it.
it is but very few have experienced it first hand. It’s a mythologized material de-
aptly short-lived installation. and obscure things. By starting towards the edge is it more possible to slip over from
signed for the skin, but it also represents certain political agendas. The failed Swed-
time? While the liminal materials I like to use do have meanings and associations That is certainly true. This attempt to move away from verbal respons-
ish aphrodisiac drink has some opposing qualities: it’s essentially sugar water—a
Your recent work has utilized materials like cough syrup, perfume, they are more tenuously attached as opposed to the connections of Coca-Cola or es or configure new ways of using language to discuss the meaning of
placebo—but it has a very specific mythology ascribed to it in which physiological
self-made napalm, an outdated Swedish energy/aphrodisiac drink, and Vaseline, for example. It’s always a game of trial and error, right? a work of art also makes me think of something you said in an interview
changes are supposed to take place.
Play-Doh, all of which seem to point to an overarching interest in the in Blouin from December 2011, which was, “I think obsolescence is the
sensorial—products of various kinds that are made to be ingested or Yes, I would think so. I also liked what you said about the third, lovechild- format of progress.” I would often tend to agree, but I am curious if you
Setting up a dichotomy is very useful since it creates a third field that holds the part
directly engaged with in tactile ways. Do you feel that an investigation like field of thought and representation that comes out of a framework can expand upon how the idea of the obsolete actually begins to gen-
I think of as the artwork. I’m interested in finding ways to move outside of language.
of such matter is an underlying aspect of your practice overall or is it rooted in a blatant dichotomy. I sense that that may very well be where erate what we would consider to be new ideas or at least contexts in
I try to think in terms of creating displays that elicit non-verbal responses. The blind
something you are just currently interested in? this new mode of language that you mentioned is generated. which to discuss contemporary art. It reminds me of another quote by
finger-poke texture and the absurdity of the forms perched on small concrete
My interest in those materials has been ongoing. In the last few years I started to Yes, the third place could be some kind of temporary truth-state where one’s inter- fashion designer Yohji Yamamoto that I recently read that said, “To be
plinths come from a place of hyper-dumbness that hopefully leads to a state for
think more exclusively about economies radiating from the human body—seeing pretations are not distorted by the ambiguity of language. The two opposing per- modern is to tear the soul out of everything.” Does that resonate with
which language has to be invented rather than chosen.
the body as the fundamental unit of currency, from which all other human econo- ceptions wrapped in language are set into motion and with some luck they arrive at you on a similar level?
mies derived. I think making an object can bring radical awareness of the body. a momentary state of perceptual “truth” in which there is no linguistic buffer to cloud It’s interesting that you bring up fashion where the “new” is so highly codified through
I definitely like the idea of artwork that demands a new kind of lan-
Working through the very old idea that sculpture provides a kind of uncanny physi- the experience. I like the term “lovechild-like field of thought.” Being that you work a seasonal mechanism. I was not aware of those words from Mr. Yamamoto but I
guage in order to accurately or appropriately discuss it, rather than
cal experience, as opposed to painting, for example, where you might create an op- with language often, is this an idea you have encountered in the past? would not disagree with him. I cannot say that I know what it means to be mod-
sort of mad-libbing of concepts that have already been applied to other
portunity to reflect on the ways images are constructed. ern as I am from a different generation. I don’t even think I know much about being
types of work. Nonetheless, many of these kinds of ingestible materials
Not exactly, I don’t think I have ever phrased it quite like that, but so post-modern. I hesitate to identify something as new or original. I think it’s one of the
that we are discussing, as you said, already have a whole mythology,
Yes, I have also often used the form and reality of the human body as many of the most intriguing concepts and works of art represent an central contradictions of this thing we are participating in—this tradition. One idea
and therefore a history embedded into them, particularly the politics of
a productive foil for larger systems at play. Lately I have been noticing inherent kind of hybridity, so I guess that quality is like a lovechild. does stick with me and it is that what we do must be disruptive, not only outward-
napalm. How do you approach the challenge of utilizing such products
more and more contemporary art that takes up materials related to I think of the particle accelerators. Giant, highway-sized circular pathways in which ly but inwardly as well. The work I admire and am interested in doing is always de-
to say something else?
these kinds of sentient ideas in similar ways, particularly food-related existing elements are smashed together at great speed to occasionally produce signed for its own eventual failure.
96 [SFAQ Issue 19] 97 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Carbon T-shirt Panel 4, 2014. Carbon fiber, Kevlar thread, t-Shirt, resin, perfume packaging, Carbon T-shirt Panel 5, 2014. Carbon fiber, Kevlar thread, t-Shirt, resin, perfume packaging,
Velcro. 50 x 36 in. Image Courtesy of Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco. Velcro. 50 x 36 in. Image Courtesy of Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco.
Napalm Stone (Graphite Version #1), 2014. Napalm, play-dough, powdered graphite,
Bad soda/Soft drunk, 2014 . Installation view. Image courtesy of the artist and Gallery Diet. Napalm Stone (Bronzer Version #1), 2014. Napalm, play-dough, spray bronzer, terrazzo.
terrazzo. 67 x 30 x 22 in. Image Courtesy of Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco.
69 x 30 x 22 in. Image Courtesy of Gallery Wendi Norris, San Francisco.
Charles Linder
In Conversation With Paul Karlstrom Would you say your real art education began in Los Angeles?
Yeah. I was shunning what I thought was painting—representational art, the
making of objects presumably for sale or on commission—for a life of unpaid
experimentation and adventure. And that’s what I think I’ve done essentially ever
Well, Charles, here we go. We’ve known one another pretty well for since. After moving north I found what I had perceived the San Francisco scene to
quite a while. be. The undeniable freedom from the sixties, the sense that anything is possible—
For almost 20 years, going back to around ’94 when your Stanford buddy, Michael Tom being one of the first persons I bumped into. That cult of individuality.
Moore, had a show at Refusalon on Natoma Street.
Tom Marioni?
It’s a long time that we’ve interacted in the local art world—we agreed Tom Marioni. And then performative rituals that created a kind of conceptual art cult
that our theme is being an artist in San Francisco and what that means. here, if you will. Those were influences on some of the things I did when I first moved
The term I would use to introduce you and your artistic identity is here. I think what I’ve done is different than what those predecessors did, but no
conceptualism. We’ll talk about that. But to start out, why don’t you doubt influenced by them. Some of the first works were Refusalon and the gallery
begin with the early events and people in your life that were influential projects through the nineties.
in shaping who and what you have become as man and artist.
I was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1967 and really grew up in the south, But you talk about this process of becoming an artist, especially the LA
primarily in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, until I was a teenager. I finished high school and time, and the influence of the poets and what you admired about them.
moved to California in ’85, to Los Angeles. I spent a few years there working, going And that seems to me a romantic notion of living the art life, of being an
to school—and loving life in LA at the time. artist, which often appears to be mostly self-focused.
I think ultimately art is the most indulgent personal activity one can possibly
Do you remember when you first became interested in art? pursue—really. Does it cross the gap to communicate with people? I don’t know. I
My mom and dad met at art school in Pittsburg. So I think I’m their biological admit to being readily absorbed in my personal pursuits. I think occasionally people
sculpture—and apparently that’s about all they have to show for art school. get my work. I like to think I’m holding up a mirror, but I realize it’s a very narcissistic
pursuit. I get better at trying to be on the outside of the bubble so that in a way you’re
Did they encourage you? looking in. But you’re also able to look outside the bubble. That’s what I would hope
I feel really lucky in that. We still look at art together. They helped push me to where I is my basic position as an artist.
am—specifically my mom.
I’m a little puzzled by a position that is so self-absorbed and insular but
Do you remember when you first became aware of art as something takes place within a community that tends to be self-congratulatory.
other than illustrations in magazines? Does it get to that point where if you live the art life, no matter what
Yes, I do. Mom was a good representational painter who trained me how to paint like you make or what you do, it’s really all about yourself and your friends?
John Singer Sargent—or, at least I thought I could. But my mom was far better at it In that respect, I would have to respond again that it is a private activity. I tried to do
than I ever was. In fact, that created kind of a schism between what I thought was a gallery for years and really enjoyed that public activity, but now I’m in a position
art and what she was doing. One of the first art things I remember took place when where I feel like my work is very private. I like working from that position rather than
I was only 15. We used to camp out in this old grain silo along the railroad tracks with having my doors open to an ostensible public that didn’t get what I was trying to offer
oval windows all the way up the side. One afternoon we lit a fire and then backed anyway. And so I feel like now I can select my audience more. I think the breakthrough
up about 100 yards and took a photo at sunset. It was this internally lit cement silo, comes when you meet that occasional individual who gets the big picture and
a beautiful image—I realized where my work was headed, towards ephemeral realizes it isn’t just about a single painting on the wall or one you might be working on
events. I look back on that as one of the first real pieces of art that I made. My friend that day—being able to give a walk-through of the studio where somebody really
that camped with me that night, she and I realized it was a great fleeting moment. We gets the big picture of lifestyle and art. I feel great if I can be a conduit, reaching out to
got that one picture to take away from the event, and sometimes that’s all you have. others who live similarly or who see art similarly.
Go west, young man. Somehow you got that message. As did earlier Well, I know you get that kind of feedback, which suggests you’re
Southern Tier artists such as Ed Ruscha—who famously chose LA. successful.
Why for you the allure of Los Angeles rather than San Francisco? Success. I don’t know what that is. I certainly couldn’t claim to have had much
My brother moved there after college, and we both wanted to start a new life. I knew commercial success. I think success is happiness and whether or not it’s working Ghostang ( at Weldon ), 2005 - present. Courtesy of the artist and Gallery 16, San Francisco and La Casa del Tunel, Tijuana.
I had to leave Alabama. It’s hard to describe why, but I just knew that I couldn’t get for you in the big picture. I’ve got a system that works for me, and I think that the
what I needed. I couldn’t become what I was trying to become at that time. One of product is trying to stay happy, trying to stay positive about what I’m doing. That’s
the first things that I did when I moved to Los Angeles was work in a machine shop. I guess that’s true. I mean, one can’t derive support entirely from no echo. I think of I was humbled to do the show there. When you’re offered a show you want to
the work, and I think I’ve got to keep it positive to keep doing it. It’s not always easy.
I lived in the back of the shop for two and a half months before I found a place, and it one artist, an Israeli artist I worked with who spent time in the Bay Area, who after his produce something for the audience that represents you but from a position that
But I would agree I make art for myself—100 percent. I don’t do this for the market. I
was an incredible welcome to what LA really was—this international community of show came back to me and said, “Charles, I just don’t feel like there was any echo offers an access point. I felt like I did that for the TJ show. It came from many visits
don’t do it for girlfriends.
people working, pursuing hybrid dreams. I lived with a handful of illegal workers who here in the Bay Area.” And I’ve heard that from many artists, especially ones not from there trying to figure out who the audience was, the people that would see it, and
were doing just about anything they could to create a new life for themselves. Most here. And I wonder if that is a plague on our scene and our work. You mentioned the whittling away at the elements in the story to include only what was necessary. That
When I say success, I mean successful in terms of communicating.
of them were from Mexico and Central America. For me, as an 18-year-old, it was possibility that I’m just talking to myself—is it all just about me? I think the Mudslinger was tough.
You’re a social person, and art is a way of communicating. Most of the
about pursuing a life of exploration and adventure. That was what art was to me and book was a good example of collaborative art making because Griff Williams gave
artists I know who really are serious about their art—that’s important
I think still is. Moving to LA was the adventure of the unknown, of the west. That was me some ribbing in a way, not unlike what you’re doing. He said, “Hey, who does this How did you make that decision? Select what was necessary for
to them.
a great time—the three years before I moved to San Francisco set the tone for my reach, or who are you trying to talk to with this?” One of the images in the book was Tijuana?
I know I reach them, but I’m not preoccupied with it. I think there are people out there
art making in California. the lid from a soda cup with two straws in it. It’s in the middle of the book. Griff just Well, the main piece was the bullet-riddled car, the Ghostang sculpture, which has
who get my work. I don’t claim to do it for them, by any means. That would be really
goes, “What the hell is this, what’s going on with this? You’ve got to tell me about this.” gone on many different voyages and seen many different moments and events.
narcissistic. But I think admitting that I do it for myself is an honest beginning. When
That was 1985, correct? And there was quite an active art scene. You The piece had been in Tijuana for a couple years—that was the main way that I
people tell me they get it, I feel like that’s a great sense of acknowledgment. I don’t
haven’t said anything that suggests you knew what was special about Remember, people have to bother to try to understand you. They have was known in Tijuana, as the guy of the Ghostang. And we tried to use Ghostang,
do it for them. But it’s sometimes heartening to know that people do like the look,
LA or San Francisco—either one. Is that true? to think it’s worthwhile. And many artists say, “Oh, well, the work takes as a point of departure throughout the book Mudslinger as a kind of touchstone or
like the feel, or get the pathos of the project, if you will. In Mudslinger, for instance—
Well, I’ve got to admit to being largely naïve about what LA held in the arts. At that care of that.” Isn’t that something of a modernist romantic notion? hallmark over the years in my work—and a way to approach Tijuana as a border
which was like an adventure handbook of my life in a funny way, a recent art book I
time I didn’t think I was pursuing any kind of art career. I thought I was becoming an The book is really all about relationships, and specifically my relationship with culture. I don’t know how successful it was, but the two night events were great, and
did for my Tijuana show—I felt really good about that piece, but it was a reflection of
artist, but I can’t even say that I knew much about contemporary art at that time. I adventure, sometimes involving girlfriends. There are a number of friends in the I felt like the people that showed up did get it.
my travels and times and the ephemera of my work.
remember seeing a show at L.A. Louver that was a stunner: a whole environment by book. So the relationship between word, image, and the overall feel that comes from
Ed Kienholz that was like an old bar that you could walk through, that really impacted their combination, I think that’s what we tried to wrench out in that book. Something What happened in these events?
But you say that you don’t particularly care. Making things is the source
me. Seeing the scale of shows that were being put on in Los Angeles impacted me, about relationships and how the image reaches its intended audience or . . . It came out of this pig roast obsession of mine. My host there, Luis Ituarte, said, “Hey,
of happiness—this, again, I guess is one way to look at an activity. But
too. I saw the video, why don’t you do one of those here?” I thought this was great and it
on the other hand, I know enough about you to say that you are pretty
Well, what is its intended audience? An intended audience presupposes gave me a chance to invite my chef collaborator to come down from Oakland, and
disappointed when people don’t seem to be paying attention or making
caring about being understood, having you and your work—and their then also a band that showed up. So it ended up being a multi-ring affair. It wasn’t just
the effort to understand you.
relationship—understood. Even appreciated. What about Tijuana? my work. It was a community event ultimately. Being able to serve them wild boar
100 [SFAQ Issue 19] 101 [SFAQ Issue 19]
As you say, you look at least foolish—if not stupid—if you think that it
all started with you and that your work is somehow . . . uniquely original.
I think it touches on what is a culture of privilege, a culture of elitism that art
precipitates—and I embrace that. I do believe it’s a very personal, selfish path. And I
think what I got from Tony, Wally Hedrick, Jason Rhoades—or the tradition of the Art
Institute—was kind of a culture of truth, seeking the individual path at the expense
of everything else . . . I look back on that time at SFAI as one of the richest of my
life, just in terms of experimenting and meeting other artists, the youthful embracing
of this ephemeral little scene we had. I think that’s what it was really all about—that
tradition of the Art Institute. The calling card has perhaps little other value, but it’s an
elitist cult that those who have been there really identify with and are proud to be
part of. I know I am.
You mentioned “truths” several times, and I think it’s fair to examine
the words we use—you know, the judgment that art is or isn’t true in a
“culture of truth.” What does that mean in the art context?
It just speaks again to whether or not I should have moved to Los Angeles after
graduate school like, say, Mark Grotjahn, whose paintings now sell for over a million
dollars. Did I do the wrong thing in staying here? I don’t think I did. It was a lifestyle
choice. But that came at the expense of perhaps selling paintings. Was it worth
it? Yes. I guess for me, the pursuit of truth is in knowing and sticking with the path
Sounder of wild pigs at Las Viboras, 2014. Courtesy of the artist and the Sparling Family. Holding an Anna’s, 2014. Courtesy of the artist and Gallery 16, San Francisco. versus being distracted by the temptation of a career, maybe a teaching job, maybe
a stable job at the post office. The truth was sticking with the path. There isn’t any
tacos in Tijuana was just nothing short of . . . Anyway, I came back from Tijuana with with it until ’99 when I essentially turned over the reins to my then co-conspirator, marked path to follow, to find your way. You have to make it all up. When you start
an incredible respect for that culture. Shmulik Krampf, and he took over the project, bringing to it his own idea of what it working in some revisionist way it’s usually pretty evident, and you think, “Oh, I don’t
was as a temporal, conceptual work. I said, “Hey, I see this as a gift. You’ve got to want to do that because so-and-so may have already done that.” That pushes you
Well, maybe that’s one reason to do it. maintain it, bring new wrapping to it—you have to fervently present it in the tradition to stay on the quest for your own unique vision. Maybe that’s what I mean by truth—
In fact, it really was. It was to embrace that whole appreciation of bubbles that I think that I’ve created.” to avoid cliché or stating the known.
is what my work really is. I saw Luis’s own passion and obsession with his pet project,
his gallery, La Casa del Tunel, a redeemed smuggler’s house. I just really identified In a short time we’ve moved to you starting Refusalon—with which During our conversation, I’ve been thinking of Dada and the idea of
with it and thought, man, I want to seek this guy out, go down there, find out what in the minds of many you are still associated. I’m still not sure if the tearing down, pushing boundaries, and that there’s merit in that goal.
the scene is about, and I just became really obsessed. I felt maybe a little tired of Natoma venue was proto-Refusalon or its first iteration. But do you feel that the Art Institute—maybe aspects of the San
my local scene, and what it forced me to do is to look elsewhere for inspiration. I feel like the heart of the matter happened in the earlier days on Natoma. That was Francisco art community, but especially the Art Institute—valorized
Community is where the connection comes from, and that’s when you realize you’re what Refusalon really was. Once we tried to change that and take it downtown and transgression, perhaps for its own sake?
not just participating in a regional circle jerk. That’s when it really gets interesting. commercialize it, it wasn’t the same anymore. The idealist in me maybe fetishizes Undoubtedly. Beyond the sensational. But I found later in my career that I seriously
Your new audience gets your work and the bubbles overlap—a kind of catalytic some of the earlier projects and really ephemeral events. needed some limits. Limitations are bad but you need boundaries within which
reaction. That’s what was great about meeting Luis and being there. your art is contained. I think setting those as an individual artist is tricky. How do you
For example, one night at a performance event on Natoma Street, perhaps one of integrate yourself into an existing system that promotes art? Or how do you create
It sounds as if you two became good friends in a short period of time. the most memorable nights ever at Refusalon—and I know Tony, my old teacher, an entire system that promotes what you think art is? That was the challenge.
But let’s now go back to San Francisco and the Art Institute. would say this was the only thing that Refusalon was memorable for—we all were
Well, I ended up getting this scholarship to come here. I perceived the Art Institute to out in the backyard watching the performer when out of nowhere this guy comes Well, in fact, what I feel you’re touching on—the kind of truth you’re bringing up—
be a vehicle for why I came to California. I look back on it really fondly. I think of it as a walking into the backyard and simply sits down right in the middle of this campfire. is that the better art comes from collaborating. I’m so bored with monomaniacal Dixie becoming Bennie, 1996. Courtesy of the artist and Gallery 16, San Francisco.
little cauldron. One of my teachers, Tony Labat, used to love to turn up the heat on us Before anyone can realize what’s happening, he’s caught on fire. The other guy’s artists, that one person doing the same thing over and over again. I need others to
tell me what’s not working, and what stays in. I think that can help you better reach Another example might be Emerson Woelffer at Chouinard in the
to watch us squirm. Tony was a really great influence on me at school. He’s there to performance, no one even remembers to this day. This guy is seriously injured. You
your audience. That’s where dialogue and having an art community really inform 1960s. Many of the younger LA artists—Ed Ruscha, Joe Goode, the
push you outside the boundaries—to provoke, inspire, challenge. One of the things can see that he’s got a grizzly burn on his ass and leg; his pants are burned off. I’ll
you and make the work what it is. Ferus people—looked up to him. Not necessarily for his work but for
that stuck with me from the years I spent there with Tony was how he would point never forget, I walked out the back door just as this happened. I run down the stairs
his example: “He showed us what it was to be an artist.”
out to us that maybe one out of 20 in the group would go on to do something that and we drag him out of the fire. I remember thinking, “Oh, my God, we’ve really gone
Some of the leading visual artists either didn’t go to art school or That’s an interesting way of putting it. I think what I took away from Richard and
might get written about or might get put in a newspaper or might get bought by a too far. I needed to set some limits here.”
dropped out. Then why go to art school? What do you get—and then Wally was that both seemed content genuinely pursuing their careers. I remember
museum. And I remember it created a bit of a culture of insecurity.
maybe don’t get? Because in the age of conceptualism, you’re no Richard having a real sense of humility and being a great teacher, being able to talk
Was he a student of Tony Labat?
longer primarily learning craft—method, materials, technique. about your work and never bringing himself into it. I think that’s the measure of a
But I remember specifically thinking, “I am going to be one of that 10 percent or He was another student of Tony’s.
That’s a good question. I guess it goes back to that thing we’ve talked about several good teacher. True, sometimes they’re talking about themselves, but they’re able
less, I’m going to be one of those people.” And in that regard, I thank Tony . . . the
times. We were ostensibly operating in what was perceived as a guild system. One to make you divorce yourself from the material. If you can divorce yourself from your
one individual there who really pushed me. He was constantly fighting to define Let’s talk about Tony. Obviously he was inspirational for you. He
thought that this would lead to being integrated into gallery shows, purchased by agenda and be comfortable in that, it radiates—its power communicates almost
a position unknown at the time. I think that’s what I always really thought art was was within what appears to be a protected school framework where
museums, written about by magazines, collected avidly by supposed art collectors. without you. I remember thinking that’s what was inspirational about Wally. His was
about, pushing you towards this lifestyle of experimentation and discovery. I found the school’s noninterference policy has been to let the teachers
In fact, what you’re buying into is an elitist system of insider trading. What the schools a body of work whose infamy preceded it—yet it didn’t add up to a commercial
Tony very inspirational in that way. do whatever they want. Apparently Bruce Conner famously took
and galleries are trying to do is commodify once-radical personal narratives by entity. What was inspirational was his commitment to this extremely personal body
advantage of that freedom. Or so I’ve been told.
converting them into salient, long-term art market investments. of work.
You were at the Art Institute from 1988 to 1990. Right? Well, I’ve heard the stories, too. I know exactly which ones you’re talking about. With
Shortly thereafter I was faced with the predicament of being a young artist—of how respect to Tony though, there were just different styles of doing things. For instance,
And you pointed out that the Art Institute at one time took pride in Well, perhaps that’s the truth-in-art we’ve been looking for.
to get my work out there, how to take my essentially private activity into the real George Kuchar would pick the star students and nudge them on to do whatever
world. There was a perceived guild system with which this supposedly operated, they wanted, but then he’d take credit for it. Tony had a similar but more provocative being the only true fine art school in the country—meaning without a
but from what I could tell it was all based on nepotism and insider trading. I realized way of going about it. At the time it was tough for me. Now I think that’s the role of commercial program—without that practical side. [Link] // Instagram @linderisms // Twitter @charleslindersf
it wasn’t going to happen unless I started my own entity. Refusalon was a vehicle for the mentor, of the teacher—to provoke. It is to ask you to consider if the pre-existing Or perhaps even more memorably, without graduates matriculating into the art
my colleagues and me to show what we thought art was, a framework for creating model is good enough for you anymore. Are you going to have to fucking destroy it, world, which I think was really the problem of the Art Institute for a while.
an audience. That was our solution to being art students no one had ever heard of. break it down, rebuild it, and then call it something different? Tony encouraged us to
We were faced with how to get people to look at the work and maybe write about create our own individual art worlds, if you will, whatever the cost. Yeah, I think that How do you mean?
it, get affirmation enough to keep doing it. That for me was about a nine-year-long was inspirational, and it created a competitive environment amongst the students. It’s like an elite cult of artists that you’re part of. Whether or not the art school
project that was essentially non-commercial. education amounted to anything, the ones who are still out there on the street doing
What I took away from Harold Bloom’s book The Anxiety of Influence (1973) had to do art and getting shows and making books—it’s interesting to be part of that. I think
What year did you open your doors? with art school and the whole idea of the others that have come before: what they of the Studio 13 jazz band as a metaphor for the Art Institute, or how I envisioned
Refusalon started in 1990, in January 1990. did and their influence on you creating anxiety. I remember thinking of that in Tony’s myself fitting in. These idealists chasing truth, in pursuit of pure art at the expense of
class—who went hard on us for knowing our antecedents. It wasn’t so much that a career. As younger artists you look at the older artists and watch their demeanor.
Now, does that include Natoma? somebody had already done something, but a lot of people operate in naiveté and You try to determine whether they’re comfortable with this, do they really believe
Yeah, the Natoma era really was the beginning. Then we took Refusalon out of don’t realize that there have been influences that have impacted their work. There this? I remember particularly Wally and Richard Shaw, who both were teacher
the South of Market “wine country”—as we used to call the neighborhood—and was a whole student subculture that was paranoid about doing art for fear that it had figures of mine. Shaw was a teacher of mine at Berkeley later. Wally was more like a
moved to Hawthorne Lane next to SFMOMA: our attempt at going commercial or already been done. I just thought that was such a paralyzed position to operate from. mentor figure. But they were living it. They were really doing it on their terms.
at least integrating market concerns with our otherwise ephemeral lifestyles. I kept Aun Aprendo, 2014. Neon sculpture. Courtesy of the artist and Gallery 16, San Francisco.
102 [SFAQ Issue 19] 103 [SFAQ Issue 19]
Dave Hickey I DO NOT BELIEVE AND I DO NOT BELONG
Your analysis of the phonotext comes out of a lifelong love of music.
Yes, and I listen well.
What was the music that preceded your studies, when you were a
child?
My dad was a bebop musician and I was a rock and roll person and I could read
music, although I can’t write it out very well. I just tend to think of things in musical
terms. This puts me in a tradition with Monet, Miro, and Braque—people who were
basically musical painters. Duchamp was the alternative and nobody got further on
a one-trick pony than he did—a phonotext critique leads you into the tangible world,
and for some reason Duchampian critique leads you back into theory. Also, I always
thought it was my job to make up jargon and not to use it. I was a serious structur-
alist in graduate school in the 1960s—I wrote art criticism for nearly twenty years
without using “desire,” “deconstruction,” or any of those words. Finally I was forced
into using them because people presumed that you had to use those words or you
weren’t “serious.” I remember the first thing I did that used those words was a piece
on Jim Shaw. It talked about “representation” and “jouissance”—which are a fairly
shoddy concepts.
After the work you did on literature in Texas, when you went to New
York to work at Reese Palley gallery, you started writing about art. How
did you approach writing then? Is there a connection between the kind other you out there in the world, doing shit, siring children . . . Eric Clapton told me this
of scholarly analysis you were doing on literature and the process of story: Cream was playing in the Midwest one night, jamming away; Clapton dropped
looking at art and writing about looking? his pick and bent over to pick it up. The crowd went wild—the whole time the crowd
I was learning how to write by studying linguistics, like a painter learning her palate. is cheering. They were cheering for him dropping his pick. He said, “I felt like walking
There may be a connection since my mother was a painter, but the sequence was off stage and killing myself. What the fuck am I doing here?”
interesting. I was doing literature and then I discovered that Ruscha, Rauschenberg,
and Johns loved language the way I loved it. I was beguiled by the idea of Ruscha Doesn’t this relate to what was going on with Warhol in New York—this
using the incarnate word, which is not the referential word but the word as flesh, and very question of celebrity—but in a more contained sphere?
Jarrett Earnest and Dave Hickey, Captiva, Florida, 2014. Photograph by Laura Ortman. that seemed pretty much to define a particular point of view, which Mapplethorpe I thought about that a lot with Andy because he was the fame guy. Finally, I think
and a lot of canonical Catholic artists used. This interested me more than Saul Bel- Andy really believed that there was true fame, or true charisma, and that Marilyn or a
low ever did—I want the language but I don’t want this shit. I threw my copy of The number of people had this true charisma. Otherwise Andy was an ad guy. He knew
In Conversation With Jarrett Earnest What I’m not doing now is interacting with the art world. Every six weeks or so I fly
to New York, I stay at the Warwick or somewhere Midtown, get a limo, and go look
Adventures of Augie March (1953) into the Atlantic—how symbolic. you could make people think anything. So the star-making process of the factory
was this enormous bullshit mind-fuck of “I can make you do that.” Warhol was a
(Part One) at art—the art promises not to say I’ve been looking at it—then I go home. I’m an art We talked earlier about that part of Auden where he says that all critics control freak. He went off the rails in the mid ‘60s when he discovered that he could
person; I’m not an “art world person” anymore. should have to define their Eden. That seems like what you’ve been make people do things. He could say “could you take off your pants, fella?” and the
‘I was stuck on a remote island for five weeks with Dave Hickey—’ I doing, and your Eden is like Las Vegas. fella would take off his pants and show Andy his dick. For Warhol, who wouldn’t do
started telling my friend when I got back in New York. Her face was You allude in several places to the work in literature you were doing as It’s like Vegas but with good waves. It has Ellsworth Kellys and French food. I think anything you told him, this must have been a traumatic disappointment. I think he
dismayed, ‘—and it was paradise,’ I went on. My friend’s disapproval a Ph.D. student at the University of Texas; I want to know a little more Eden is a good subject because the idea of utopia is a dead turd, some group inven- was angry that all he had built was a bunch a people who would do whatever he
slowly melted as I spoke, until she finally confessed, ‘I picked up his about what you were working on. tion. Seeking the architecture of Eden is my own little search for the sources of the told them to. I’ve always regarded fame the way Andy did; I know people who have
recent book and liked it, but someone saw it and told me, ‘Don’t read I was figuring out what I would call a grammatical calculus for describing language Nile, so I never really feel competitive with anyone. Peter Schjeldahl can write pretty authentic charisma—Rod Stewart has authentic charisma. If you’re in the room with
that! I know it seems exciting, but he is a misogynist cowboy,’ and I in a musical sense, incorporating elements of speed and frequency, so that you’re things and I say “that’s pretty.” Peter Plagens and any number of my contemporaries him, he’s in Technicolor and you’re in black and white. I’ve known a few people like
never finished it.’ This is not an uncommon response to the mention not just counting the repetitions of the word but you’re counting how often and how can write nice things—Paul Taylor could, even Craig Owens when he wasn’t in the that, but fame is mostly copy and coverage. A lot of the people I know who are fa-
of Dave Hickey, an iconoclastic writer eliciting ire and adoration for his fast words repeat so you can get a much clearer sense of the prose you’re describ- grip of his professors. The way that I write never became anything in the art world mous are like Emmylou Harris, who is an old friend of mine. Emmylou is comfortable
belles lettres prose and his crusade against art world iniquity. When ing. It’s more like musical notation software. I had a passage from Hemingway, D.H. but “the way Dave writes.” one place: on the stage with a guitar behind the microphone. If she’s not there, she’s
I realized we’d be together in residence at the Robert Rauschenberg Lawrence, and Gertrude Stein each in three states of revision. Because I was at UT, not comfortable. I’m sure there is some psychological name for that.
Foundation my mind flashed to his recent talk in LA where he reported- they had all the manuscripts. I thought I could encode all these and, since revisions I feel one of the problems in the art world now is the people writing
ly said, ‘Identity politics broke the art world.’ As a flamboyant gay man are presumed to be intentional, I could make empirical statements about intention about art and putting on shows are not reading novels or poems, and When you started to become involved with people who were “real” ce-
intending to spend the entire residency in the shortest possible shorts, by encoding the changes from version to version. Nobody makes empirical state- that’s a big impoverishment of experience. lebrities in the music world, what did it show you about art?
and as a writer largely interested in art by people who are not straight ments about intention, but I thought that it could be done, and I think I pretty much did No shit! They don’t know what a Beethoven quartet is either. Four movies about a The first thing I learned is that there is no qualitative difference between great pop
white guys, I worried we might not get along. What I found was, like it, although I ran up against a lot of problems with my committee. Most offensively, I St. Bernard, perhaps? I teach a course called “The Sisterhood of the Arts” and it’s and great art. Good is good. Second thing I learned was that if you’re going to be in
all brilliant and truly worthwhile people, Dave Hickey is complicated took exception to a part of Chomsky that he couldn’t live without but I could—I’ll give about the points where art, music, and drama intersect. That sisterhood—that pri- rock and roll, bring a friend, because it can all turn to shit fast. I’ve known the guys
and I liked him immensely. Authentic, fun and deeply sensitive—he is you an example: “I” and “you”—personal pronouns? They’re not “pronouns.” They mal interconnection—that dance of frequencies—is being changed into a primal from The Eagles over the years and just in passing, and they were really good bud-
all you could want in another person in the world. I ordered his books don’t stand for nouns; they stand for gestures, they stand at the portal between the connection to academic prose, and that is cultural suicide. dies and that blew up so hysterically. I never would think of writing about an artist
while I was there and I was struck by how beautifully he fits the pre- palpable world and the world of language, and that changes the way sentences are the way I wrote about Keith Richards, because the object is there today and there
cision of his language with the originality of his ideas. During our last generated. It also creates a kind of tiered system so that sentences that use “I” are After you worked in the New York art world for a period in the ‘70s, you will be another every day—there will be a new day when they’re dead—so that is a
week in Captiva we met for three mornings on his sunny porch to re- first level sentences, “you” or “it” are in different categories altogether. Shifting into left to be part of the music scene. What precipitated that? liberation.
cord this conversation. The most important missing elements from this and out of these modes, especially with D.H. Lawrence, seemed to be a good way of Boredom. I got tired of invitations I couldn’t refuse. I got fired from my gallery job. I got
transcription are the skinks, the thick sunshine, and the laughter that demonstrating that, but I couldn’t do it without dissing Chomsky—and I did severely fired from Art in America. I started freelancing about music. I describe the moment Do you listen to music when you write?
punctuated our conversations. want to diss Chomsky. They—never let me defend my dissertation, but I wrote it; I like this—it was ‘72 or ‘73—I’m walking out of a Richard Tuttle show where he has No. I used to, but I don’t anymore. I hear the words too much.
MORNING ONE: A Pirate Retirement learned a whole lot; and I was right. glued weird white pieces of paper to the wall. I’m thinking “Richard Tuttle or Keith
Richards? Richard Tuttle or Keith Richards?” It was as simple as that—it was more There seems like an interesting connection to you being a songwriter
In Pirates and Farmers (2013) you describe the personality type of the You reference J. L. Austin. Is that where your thinking about language fun to write about Keith Richards. The drugs were better for sure. Also I was really and traveling with country music people and the way that you dealt
pirate concluding, “The paradox of a pirate retirement. You can’t do it.” then goes? Toward his performative speech acts? interested in that kind of fame, not in the sense of wanting it, but just in knowing what with the more recent phase of your life as a critic, which is as a persona
So I lied, and have before. I have a history of quitting things I have not found worthy. I treat literary prose as performative speech, and I’m interested in what they call the the mechanics of fame might be. an “outlaw,” an oppositional voice.
Sometimes I’m wrong, but I am still here to write about art that doesn’t come with an “phonotext”—you hear it as you read it. If you can’t hear the phonotext, you don’t Well, I named those Nashville guys “The Outlaws” in a magazine article. As for me,
excuse or a letter from a doctor. know what prose is. Many academics don’t deal with the phonotext at all, they just When I was still running the gallery in SoHo, I was sitting in Max’s. Two people in an- I’m a hard core alienated person, although a sweetie pie. I went to grammar school
read the words. I’m doing a talk at the College Art Association in February called other booth were talking about me. According to them it turns out I have a trust fund, for four years at thirteen grammar schools, and if you do this, you get good at good-
“Theory and Critique: The Raw and the Cooked” and I come out in favor of the I’m bisexual, and have an eidetic memory. The last is true but they were describ- bye. I’m happy to see people that I haven’t seen in fifteen years, that’s ok. We don’t
What was the purpose of proclaiming a retirement, knowing full well raw theory—no footnotes, so it’s lodged into the world, not lodged into other texts ing—there was a whole description of a person who was not me and I was thinking: exchange Christmas cards, that’s ok. I’m always sad when they die, and that is one
it’s impossible for a pirate like you? What are you doing now that is through footnotes. Jesus, what would it be like to be Rick Derringer or someone like that. So for me the good thing about digital: the hardest thing to do is to take dead people out of your
different? music writing was really focused on the vagaries of fame—what is it like to have an- Rolodex. I remember taking Scott Burton out of my Rolodex and thinking “awe, boo
What drew you to that particular collection? We ended up at a Spanish restaurant. There were two restaurants we would go to.
Well, my mother was always taking me to museums, and what interested me most, One was Il Faro, on East 14th Street, which was Italian, and then there was El Faro,
I think, at that time, was a huge Rubens, Prometheus Bound. I was always very fond on West 14th Street, and that was Spanish. So, we ended up at El Faro, and Ray or-
of that. Then somehow or another, what first attracted me to the Arensberg collec- dered paella. They took the cover off this thing, and it was a face with two oysters for
tion were the paintings by Dalí. There was one particular painting, Soft Construction eyes. That was how the day ended. The whole day had been like that. That’s the way
with Boiled Beans (Premonition of Civil War), 1936, one of those things with beautiful it could be with Ray. And then, two days later, he brought me a collage, which I still
light and battle scenes and bodies all over the place, people dying, and the king in have, of course. And what is the collage? It is not an eye—e-y-e—it is a black paper
miniature in the middle. There was that, and there were the Brancusis. There was a cut out in the form of an I—“I” as in “me.” That’s the way it was with Ray.
huge wonderful Mayan calendar—this great big circular stone. And then, there was
Duchamp. There were all these weird things there, and it was intensely fascinating. How were you supporting yourself at this time?
I was teaching. I was teaching at P. S. 78 on East 5th Street. First I was in graduate
Were you drawn to Duchamp at thirteen? school. I went to graduate school at NYU in 1963-64. I got a master’s degree there
Oh, absolutely. It was very strange. I have no idea why. I wrote a piece about that in English Literature. But it was becoming ever more clear to me that I was not an
once for Leggere, an Italian magazine. It’s all about taking the bus to get to Fairmount academic. That was one of the routes people would have sent me down, but that
Park and going to the museum to see the Arensberg Collection. For a while, the wasn’t really where I was, and it made me unhappy. So, after my master’s degree, I
great mystery for me was how Duchamp managed to break the Glass [Large Glass, didn’t want to continue on to a Ph.D. I thought I’d have to, but I really didn’t want to at
1915–1923] exactly that way, because it could not have occurred to me at that time that time, so I got a job teaching junior high school at P. S. 78. Then there was another
that there was anything accidental about anything. So, my question was, how did he one in Bedford-Stuyvesant, and then Italy happened.
manage to break the glass in exactly the way he wanted to? It didn’t occur to me that
it could possibly be an accident. How did Italy happen and why?
Italy happened – it’s another Bill Wilson connection. One of my friends at Bowdoin
Well, that’s a fantastic background. College—a lovely person, David Berry—was from Maine, an old name family. His
It was very strange, because, you know, I was attracted to these things—the Large mother was Priscilla Alden something. There were two boys. Bruce, who was one
Henry Martin and Ray Johnson. 1964. Photographed by William S. Wilson. Courtesy of William S. Wilson. Glass. I loved the cage with the marble sugar cubes—Why Not Sneeze, Rose Sélavy. year older then me, and David, who was three years older. They had a lovely farm
There was also a very strange Portrait of Dr. R. Dumouchel. I didn’t know anything in Bowdoinham. Priscilla was Bill’s friend. David was quite special, because he had
about it. I couldn’t make sense of anything at all, but it was a place for me of enor- accidentally shot himself in the arm when he was fourteen or fifteen. He played the
In Conversation With John Held, Jr. You’ve interviewed so many people—Ray Johnson, George Brecht,
Francesco Conz, to name a few—but has anyone ever interviewed
mous fascination. There were also the Brancusis, his various versions of Bird in
Space. I had no idea of his relationship with Duchamp at the time. I didn’t know any-
mandolin beautifully even though he had very little mobility in his right hand. David
had been my classmate in Bill’s Chaucer course. David’s home in Bowdoinham was
you?
In the mid-1950s, while yet thirteen years old, Henry Martin haunted thing about it until a little bit later, maybe 1963 or 1965, when I knew Gene Swenson. one of the places we went. David graduated a couple of years before I did.
No, I don’t think so. Oh, yes, a friend named Lea Vergine did an interview with me for
the Philadelphia Museum of Art, paying special attention to the Walter Gene did this very important exhibition at the Institute of Contemporary Art, in Phila-
Uomo Vogue—“Vogue for Men.” That was very strange. Lea is an Italian art critic.
C. Arensberg Collection, and in particular, the art of Marcel Duchamp. delphia, called The Other Tradition. Gene was another person I met because of Bill. I He reappeared in my mail yesterday, because there is a Maine mail artist who is
She’s married to Enzo Mari, who is sort of the last remaining prince of Italian design.
Fifteen years later, he was in Milan, Italy, assisting Arturo Schwartz in had gone to New York in 1963 because of Bill. He had already introduced me to Ray applying for a residency at the Emily Harvey Foundation, and I wrote back, “Do you
She’s been a friend for a long time. She did a series of interviews for Uomo Vogue,
the preparation of the monumental monograph, The Complete Works Johnson, and through Ray I met Gene, and through Gene, and on and on and on. know Dave Berry, by any chance?” He replied, “Yes, I do. And if I get the fellowship,
which became a book called The Last Eccentrics, and I was one of the last eccen-
of Marcel Duchamp (Abrams, 1969). Between those seminal years, he Dave will pay me a visit.” David had graduated from Bowdoin, and he had come to
trics. I don’t know if I deserved that.
attended Maine’s Bowdoin College, schooled by Ray Johnson scholar I’ve read the first time you met Ray was when you brought some lob- Italy. I don’t know why. He taught for two years at the Bocconi University in Milan. At
William S. Wilson; moved to New York, where he befriended Johnson, sters down from Maine? that point, David didn’t want to teach for a living, and he wanted to go to India. That
Did that only appear in Italian? Both the magazine article and the book?
as well as members of Fluxus; and relocated to Italy on a permanent That was the lobster trip, yes, in 1961 or 1962 [laughs]. For a long time, he sent me didn’t happen, and he came back to the States to run his farm. David decided he
Yes, only in Italian.
basis, initially as a university professor, becoming a foreign correspon- pictures of lobsters. To which I had no idea how to respond, because that was the wasn’t going to stay in Italy, so he wrote to me and said, “Henry, one of the things I do
dent for Art International, Art and Artists, Studio International, and Art thing with Ray. Many people don’t really understand Ray, because they always sort here is teach a Chaucer course, and they need somebody who can handle Chaucer
You mentioned to me previously that you were a student in the 1950s.
News. His subsequent career has been just as significant, meeting of reduce him to the level at which they knew him. Ray was solitary, but he also had and Beowulf at the university in Milan. Would you like to do that?” I was kind of unde-
I was at Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine. I was there from 1959 through 1963.
artists associated with Arte Povera and Nuclear Art, writing the first enormous capacities, enormous capabilities of empathy. Ray could and would cided, and I wrote a note to Bill, even though we were both in New York City. I told
In my sophomore year, 1960–1961, I had the enormous good fortune to study Chau-
English monograph on Nouveau Réaliste, Arman (Abrams, 1973), and meet you wherever you were. He could fly with the angels and run with the wolves, him that David had suggested that I take his job in Milan. Bill wrote back, “Go, go, go
cer with Bill Wilson [William S. Wilson, Ray Johnson scholar and collector].
several books on the artist George Brecht, conducting an essential in- and do babysitting in between. Ray’s task with me was more like babysitting, I think. to Italy. Romantics always do.” [Laughs.]
terview with Ray Johnson, curating a number of important Fluxus ex- I’m not sure.
He had come up from New York to teach?
hibitions, and joining the Emily Harvey Foundation board of directors What year was this?
No. He was teaching there at Bowdoin College. Bill taught there for two years. He
in continuing the late gallerist’s support of contemporary artists, poets You lived near each other. That would have been 1965. I sailed on a boat from New York harbor in August 1965,
taught in both my freshman and sophomore years. I don’t know if I knew about
and musicians. I interviewed him at the Emily Harvey Gallery (Archivio I had an apartment on East 3rd Street. Way over there between Avenue C and Ave- and came to Italy, landed in Naples, and headed to Milan, because that was where
Bill, I don’t think I could have. But somehow or another, I saw fit to take his Chaucer
Emily Harvey) during the course of my residency at the Foundation in nue D, right above Houston Street. Ray lived right below Houston Street on Suffolk the job was going to be. Meanwhile, I had begun, again at Bill’s suggestion, to write
course. That was important for very many reasons. Chaucer is the reason I learned
Venice, Italy, during November and December 2014. Street—76 Suffolk Street. We would often meet at the post office. He’d ask me to about art, he had suggested that I write an article about his mother’s work. So, by
Italian. So, that’s sort of a footnote, for Bill was important in many other ways.
come meet him at the post office, which was on a square near 6th Street between the time I left for Italy I had written about May Wilson and also about Lowell Nesbitt.
Avenue A and Avenue B. It was Tompkins Square Park. Ray did one of the pages for
The first time I did it, there was a show of American graphics at a local museum, and
I’m an American and an art critic, so they asked me to do that, and I did it. This also
put us more closely in touch with a wonderful man—later the first director of the
new Bolzano Museion—named Piero Siena. Piero was very much like my father:
very handsome, very urbane, beautifully dressed and always soft-spoken. Women
adored him, and he also had a kind of attentive reserve.
There’s one more seat up here in front. Let’s see. I’ll take you. Come up and take this
seat up here.
This year is the hundredth anniversary of the famous Armory show in New York City,
1913—it was the first time that the word avant-garde was used, and it was the first
time Americans had seen modern art. They had Gauguin and Van Gogh, Picasso,
Matisse, and Marcel Duchamp. That’s where Duchamp showed his famous Nude
Descending a Staircase, which one critic referred to as “an explosion in a shingle
factory,” and it was a big scandal.
A guy named Frederick C. Torrey, who was an art dealer in San Francisco, had a
gallery at 550 Sutter Street. He sold antiques and Japanese prints. Torrey went
to the Armory show in New York and he bought Duchamp’s Nude Descending a
Staircase and brought it back to San Francisco. He paid $324 for it, which, in today’s
money, is about $5,500.
He had that painting for years and showed it in his gallery, and also he loaned it out
and it traveled around. And then in the 1970s the Reese Palley Gallery was in the
same space. It showed all the conceptual artists, Bruce Nauman, Terry Fox, Paul
Kos, me, and other conceptual artists of the period—mostly California artists. I lived
in that gallery for a whole week, as a project, and I had my first LSD experience. That
was the first and last time I had an LSD experience.
Sometime in the ‘70s, the Reese Palley Gallery went out of business and another
gallery moved in there at 550 Sutter Street. I can’t remember the name of it. They
had an opening of Andy Warhol’s paintings. Warhol came to the opening, and
brought Carol Doda with him as his date—she’s the topless dancer from North
Beach. They arrived in a limousine and all the news media were there out on the
sidewalk. Warhol entered the gallery with Carol Doda and then they separated. It
was just about his entrance.
Terry Fox got drunk at the opening, and in the back hall there was a line waiting to
get in the bathrooms, so he peed into one of the empty paint buckets there and was
escorted out by a guard, in front of everybody including Andy Warhol. He went on
the wagon for six months after that. Leonardo da Vinci, Mona Lisa, 1503-1517. Oil on poplar. 30 x 20.5 in.
I told this story to Jasper Johns and everybody at the dinner. Then I asked Johns,
Today, 550 Sutter Street is the Craft and Design Museum. I went in there about a “Have there ever been any fakes, any copies of your paintings?” and he said,
year ago. I told them these stories and they had no idea that the space had a history “Impossible.”
with Duchamp’s Nude Descending a Staircase or Andy Warhol’s opening with Carol
Doda. In 1975 I was the founding editor of an art journal called Vision published by Crown
Point Press. We did five issues: California, Eastern Europe, New York City, Artists’ Talks,
and Artists’ Photographs. That was the last one, 1981. For the Eastern Europe and
All those who believe in telekinesis raise my hand. New York issues I went to the places and visited artists in order to collect material.
For the New York issue, every artist got six pages. I went to Carl Andre’s penthouse
apartment—he was living with an art dealer at the time. He was a famous artist and
I don’t know if you all know this, but I founded the Museum of Conceptual Art. It a Marxist, and there he was in his overalls in this penthouse.
was the first alternative art space in the country, and I organized some of the first
conceptual art shows and the first video art show in California, the first sound I went the next day to meet with Walter De Maria. He did The Lightning Field in New
sculpture show anywhere, and a lot of ground-breaking shows. I was in the peace Mexico. We went to lunch at an Italian restaurant—I had spinach ravioli and he
and freedom party, I supported artists, and I am an artist myself. And do you think I’m had veal piccata. He said, “Where are you going next?” I said, “I’m going to see Sol
known for that? You fuck one sheep . . . LeWitt.” I already knew Sol but they had never met. Imagine that—and they lived
three blocks from each other. It was in the Little Italy part of New York. We went to
In 1970, I went to Los Angeles and there was a dinner at Irving Blum’s house for Sol’s studio together, and I happened to have a joint with me. The three of us got
Jasper Johns. I was visiting Larry Bell and Larry had been invited to the dinner. Irving stoned in Sol’s studio, and that was one of the high experiences of my life.
Blum is the guy who had the Ferus Gallery, a famous gallery in Los Angeles at that
time. I told a story at the dinner. I said, “The guy I used to work with, Hayward King, In 1980 there was a gallery in Naples, Italy, run by Lucio Amelio. It was the hippest
who was the director of the Richmond Art Center when I was curator there, had a gallery in Italy, and he had invited Andy Warhol and Joseph Beuys to have a show.
boyfriend in Paris who was a curator at the Louvre Museum. Hayward used to go to At that time Warhol was the most famous American artist, and Beuys was the most
Joseph Beuys and Andy Warhol. Paris every summer. The Louvre curator told him that the Mona Lisa on exhibit was famous European artist. Beuys had his usual felt and fat and his organic materials.
not the real thing. It was a copy, because in 1911 the painting was stolen by an Italian He did art about generating electricity, power, heat, and light—things like that.
and brought to Italy for three years. It was recovered, but there have been other Beuys’s art was all about curious materials.
attempts to steal it or deface it over the years, so they kept the copy on display.”
He emailed me back: “We didn’t quite forget the yellow light. In fact, it was a conscious
decision not to use it. We felt that Golden Rectangle already looked so good and was
such a draw to visitors who see it through the gallery door that we would actually
lessen the impact with a yellow light. I intended to call you to discuss our thoughts,
but I’m afraid my mind moved on to future exhibitions. I do hope you will not feel that Charlie Chaplin.
we interfered with your concept. Our intention is always to present works of art to
their maximum advantage. We are pleased and honored to have your work included
in the exhibition, and I hope we will have future opportunities to bring you and your Charlie Chaplin goes to visit Picasso and he doesn’t speak French, and Picasso
Miles Davis. doesn’t speak English. Picasso was a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, and vice versa.
work to our museum.”
Picasso pulls out all his paintings to show Chaplin. After that, Chaplin goes into
Mel Bochner said to me, “Larry Bell is just Sol LeWitt with color.” Larry Bell was doing Picasso’s bathroom and takes out Picasso’s shaving cream, soaps up his face, and
I emailed him back with this message: “The yellow light was not an afterthought. beautiful glass boxes that had slight color on them, and Sol LeWitt was doing kind
Many of my sculptures are lighted with yellow light. It’s a signature with me. Did you shaves for Picasso.
of cubed open space objects. That was a put down, because “California’s just about
light it with yellow light and then decide it looked better without it? color.” The comedian Jonathan Winters was a Sunday painter, and he had a show in a
The work looks good the way it is, but it looks better with the yellow light, the way I gallery. Somebody came up to him and said, “You know, if you weren’t Jonathan
In 1968 I went to the Monterey Jazz Festival with Alvie Lersen, a Cincinnati friend. We Winters nobody would pay $10,000 for that painting.” And he says, “But I am
intended it. I understand the lighting is usually the job of the installer, but in this case are driving around late at night—it is midnight and we see a diner. As we’re driving,
the yellow light is a component of the piece. It’s not the job of the curator to change Jonathan Winters.”
I see this red Ferrari. And it’s Miles Davis. He is with another guy. I say, “Follow that
an artwork to try to improve it. But don’t feel bad, it happens to me all the time.” car.” We stop at the diner, we go in, and Miles Davis is sitting down at the counter. I sit Bertrand Russell was giving a lecture on the origin of the universe and he said,
on the next stool. On the other side next to him is the other guy, one of his musicians. “Nobody knows the origin.” And a woman puts up her hand and she says, “I know
In the early ‘70s, I knew Robert Crumb slightly. For the last twenty years he’s lived
in the south of France, but in the ‘70s he lived in San Francisco with two women, the answer.” And he says, “What is it?” And she says, “The universe is resting on a
I sat down and thought, “Oh, my God. Here’s my chance to talk to Miles Davis.” And turtle.” And he says, “Well, what’s the turtle resting on?” And she says, “It’s turtles all
Kathy Goodell and Dotty Reed. They were sort of the basis for the characters in I knew that if I were to talk to him, he would put me down, or he would just say, “So the way down.”
what?” Because that’s what he used to say to fans. He even wrote a song called So
What. An artist comes home and he finds his house has burned down. And he asks the
fireman, “What happened?” And the fireman says, “The museum director came to
I said, “Excuse me, do you have a light?” And he handed me a pack of matches your house, murdered your family, and burned your house down.” And he says, “You
without even looking. I lit my cigarette, said “thanks, man,” and I handed him the pack mean the museum director came to my house?”
of matches. His friend next to him said, “What do you want to give that honky a light
for?” And Miles said, “Shut up.” In the ‘70s I was down in LA visiting John Coplans, who had been curator of the
Pasadena Museum and was then editor of Artforum magazine. He got together
I visited Chuck Close one time in New York in his studio and he was working on a with me and Irving Blum, from the Ferus Gallery. We had lunch and they said to me,
painting of April Gornik. She’s a great painter and a great beauty. She’s got big full “We want you to move your Museum of Conceptual Art to Los Angeles.” I went to a
lips, and she’s just like a movie star, she’s so beautiful. Chuck Close says, “You see party that night at Coplans’s house. He had a fluorescent light tube on his wall, and I
those lips? That’s $60 worth of cadmium red.” said, “Wow. Far out. He’s got a Dan Flavin in his house.” And somebody said, “That’s
not a Flavin. It’s just a light he bought.” And everybody was swimming nude in the
This is a story that I heard Lenny Bruce tell; I saw Lenny Bruce twice back in the swimming pool out back. That was LA in the ‘70s.
‘60s. This guy’s in a hotel room and it’s late at night and he’s got a friend with him and
they’re sharing a room. There’s a sink in the room, and the bathroom’s down the hall. 1970 was the first time I did the piece that I’m most known for, The Act of
So, the guy gets up in the night and he’s starting to piss in the sink. His friend wakes Drinking Beer with Friends is the Highest Form of Art. I proposed it to the Museum
up and says, “What are you doing? I hope you’re not pissing in the sink.” of Contemporary Art in Chicago, and they said, “We’ll do it.” But the president of
the board nixed it later, even after it was already announced in their museum
The guy says, “Oh no, I was just washing my leg.” So the friend says, “Well, you better newsletter.
not.” The guy still has to pee and he can’t go down the hall—he’s not dressed—so
he goes out on the ledge. He’s going to piss outside the window. After he goes out Then I went to Gerald Nordland, director of the San Francisco Museum of Modern
on the ledge of the window, the fire engines pull up and then the police are there Art, and asked him if I could do the Beer with Friends work there, and he said, “We
with speakers and lights. And they’re saying, “Stay there.” They call a priest, and the never present anything in this museum until it’s at least five years old.” That was a
priest is on the megaphone and he says, “Don’t do it my son.” And the guy says, “I just rule he just made up on the spot. Marcel Duchamp, Nu descendant un escalier n° 2, 1912. Oil on canvas. 57×35 in.
R. Crumb.
#HANDS
Zine Reviews By Lele Saveri
Please Come Again
By Camilla Candida Donzella (Italy)
If it wasn’t for Camilla Candida Donzella I would prob-
ably not be making zines or doing much of what I do
now. Multidisciplinary artist and long-time friend and
collaborator, Camilla is based in Milan. She’s been
doing things since before it was cool to do things.
Events, zine fairs, pop-up stores, photos, drawings,
illustrations—there isn’t much she hasn’t made into
a zine or turned into art. I picked her latest publication
(considering her productivity, she’s probably already
made a few new ones by the time this article comes
UP
out), which is a collection of found snapshots, mostly
very old, in which Camilla has covered every person
with white paint making them look like ghosts. A very
simple but funny appropriation of existing images.
[Link]
DON’T
ple and adorable idea that brought me back to my school years and the many different ways I would find
to let all my crushes know my feelings . . . something that died with text messages.
Artists included : Eve Ahearn, W.M. Akers, Christina Drill, Joe Koplowitz, Alex Lee, Robert Norman, Joey
Pisacane, Travis Watkins, and Ted Watkins.
[Link]/shop-zines
[Link]
[Link]
Meg Hitchcock, Shema: Deuteronomy 6:4 (detail), 2014
Letters cut from the Koran on archival paper, 11 x 14 in.
Courtesy of RandallScottProjects.
still solid
Dissolving
distinctions
between art and
everyday life.
January–March
CLARK SWARTHOUT
On the main wall
January–March
SADIE MELLERIO
Window installation
Art Bar
March–May
ANDREW AGUTOS
500 Divisadero Street (at Fell)
On the main wall [Link] 111 MINNA ST SF CA 94105 4 1 5 9 74 1 7 1 9 1 1 1 M I N N AG A L L E R Y. C O M
February - March 2015
Pamela Wilson-Ryckman
Tomas Nakada
Artists News:::
Dean Byington : American University Museum “Buildings without Shadows”
Bruce Conner Print Survey : San Jose ICA “Somebody Else’s Prints”
Bruce Conner & Jean Conner : American University Museum “YES! Glue”
Lynn Hershman Leeson Retrospective : ZKM Karlsruhe “Civic Radar”
Mildred Howard : Lee Krasner Award recipient
David Ireland : UC Press Book Release: 500 Capp Street by Constance Lewallen