RcscarcllGatc

New Technology in Agriculture Using Neutrosophic Soft Matrices with the

Help of Score Function
Artic\e ' January 2070

4
163

flawed Jalar
flu k a mrna d Saq lain
UnhemigofMonngementand Technology(Pabstan{
Lahore Gardson Unhen ity
fl9 Pt BLICñTON5 496 CI7ATIOfi S

so me oF lhe authon a i this publication are a Isa working on these rela ted
projecte-

d Neutrosophic Hypersoh Secs Vieyv protect

fiuzzy Sim llarity u xin g d iHeren t Terh niq ues View prnjert

All come nt following this page was uploaded by Navced J a far on l0 April 2B2E

Scanned with CamScanner

 New Technology in Agriculture Using Neutrosophic Soft
Matrices with the Help of Score Function
hfuliamniad Nzvccd Jafar , ftluhammad Saqtain', Ahmad Raza S6afiq2, ltluhammad Khalid2
Hatnza Akbar'. Aatnir Navced°
Lahnre Garrison Univeisit)•, Sec-C,Av-4, DHA Phase-VI, 54000 Lahnre Pakistan

Uncertainty is a b ig problem in our rouline life. Manv theories were developed to handle uncertain environments.
This paper approaKhes the concept of neutrosophic sofi matrices (NSM) and multiple types of NSM to achieve
sol ations tn a possible problem and provide ideas to tackle other problems relating to uncertainDes. Here, NSM
has been utilized to demonstrate the performance of different farmers, and further score function has been
implemented to solve a possible application of decision making in agriculture. It explains the selection of the best
farmer by scientific experts through an algorithm in this paper. The selection based upon the better production of
crop and nature, fertilizer, pesticides, etc. are used as attributes, which will contribute to the performance of each
farmer. Finally, combining the attributes, which will help us achieve a conclusion to determine the best farmer.

Keyu ords: Neutrosophic Soft Set, NSM, Agriculture, Dec ision Making, Score function

Many researchers use different tools to solve the uncertainties and problematic issues in different fields
like engineering business administration, environment, medical sciences. etc„ svhich are unable to
solve. by using standard mathematical tools. To overcome the difficulties of standed tools, researchers
«ork to apply different tools to deal xx'ith uncertain problems Some of these are fuzzy sets,
intuitionistic fuzzy sets, neutrosnphic sets, etc. In 1965 Lotfi A Zadeh [ I ] proposed a wonderful theory
named the fuzzy set theory to dea) with uncertain issues. further, in 1975, a more advanced interval-
valued fuzzy set (IVFS) was proposed by Yang [2], which has a wide range than a simple fuzzy set, In
1982, Paivalk initiated another wonderful theory named rough set theory [3] After that, the intuit
ionistic fuzzy set theory was coined by Atanassov [4] in 1983. In 1995 neutrosophic fuzzy set was
proposed by Florentine Sinarandache [5). After that, in 1999, Molodtsov |d] developed the soft set
theory, which is a major mathematical operator ss'hen dealing with decision-making problems in a
vague environment It has w•ide applications such as decision matting in the medical field, economics,
and social sciences. In 2001, Maji et al. [7] extended the Molodtsov [6] theory and defined different
basics of soft sets. Later in 2004, Maji et al. [8] proposed the idea of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets.
Cagrnan [9] coined the idea of fiizzy soft matrices in 2010. Fuzzy sofl matrices have a wide range of
applications in decision-making problems. However, simple matrix theory fails when sometimes
dealing with uncertainty problems. After that, in 2012, Das and Chetia [10} introduced intuitionisiic
fuzzy soft matrices (abbr. IFSMs) with

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 78

Scanned with
different types of products arid) axioms on these products. Then, Mondal et al. [11, l2J introduced
different types of IFSMs. In some real-world problems, we need to go with different tools to solve the
uncertainty and abstruse problems, and furthermore, if we talk about intuitionisiic fuzzy sofi sets, we
just have to deal xvith truth and false-membership values for a proper description of an object The
intuilionistic fuzzy sets can only handle the unclear info regarding both truth and false membership
values. The neutrosophic soft set is a complete family of all neutrosophic sets, which is the generalized
form of an intuitionistic fuzzy soft set with truth-value, indeterminate value, and false value In 2013
P.K Maj i [13] defined different nperators on neutrosophic fuzzy sofl set and applied soft sets in
unpredictable problems, In 2014, Broum et al, [ l4J defined interval-valued NSS and its applicalions
in decision-making problems In the same year, Broumi et al [15] proposed different relations nn
interval-valued neutrosophic soft sets. II leads to decision making in various fields of life. In 2014,
Broumi, et at [ 16] applied different mappings on neutrosophic sofl expert sets. In the same year, Irfan
Deli and Broumi[ 17] defined neutrosophic soft matrices and used soft matrices in decision-making
Applications were requiring decision-making, having multiple selection criteria Researchers applied
these techniques in decision making in different fields of life In 2019, Jafar et at. [18) applied
intuilionistic sofi set in medical diagnose. In 2019, Jafar et at. [19] worked on Smchez’s identification
by trapezoidal fuzzy number In 2020, Jafar et al [20] discussed the application of sofl-set relation and
soft matrix in medical diagnosis by Sanchez. In 2019. Riaz et a1 [2 I ) studied the hardness of the svater
in laundry based on the fuzzy logic controller The selection of smartphones in Pakistan decision making
by 8 aqlain et al {22] in 2018. In 2019, Saqlain et al [23] predicted about 2019 Cricket world cup by
TOPSIS Technique Researchers [24-26] applied different strategies for problem solving and selection
In 2009, Mustafa et al. [27] applied fuzzy logic on sorting and grading in agriculture After in 2013,
Papageorgion et al. [28) proposed yield prediction using the fuzzy cognitive map. In 2014, Virgin and
Riganabanu [29] proposed an application of an interval -valued fuzzy soft matrix for the detection of
diseases in plants In 20l7„ Neamatollah et al. [30] proposed an optimal cropping pattern of agriculture
on the fuzzy system, In 2018, Mota ct at. [31] defined fuzzy validity measures and their applications of
decision making in agricultural engineering In the same year, 2018, Loganathan and Pushpaiatha [32]
proposed an application in agriculture using fuzzy matrices In 2019, Savarimuthu and Mahalaksmi [33]
defined T-Conorm operators on IFSM and proposed its applications in agriculture. For more
information on neutrosophic theory and their application, we refer the readers to the following
references [34-37). In this paper, the concept of neutrosophic fuzzy sofl matrices, different types of
fuzzy neutrosophic sofl matrices, and some operators on sofi matrices and its application in agriculture
has been demonstrated. Several applications, studied under neutrosophic sofl matrices. fuzzy
neutrosophic matrices and neutrosophic fuzzy matrices, have been worked on and are being worked nn
as we speak. Conclusively, neutrosophic fuzzy soft matrices have been used in decision making to
approach the desired result. The goal is to display the usage of the said concepts and ideas in the
possible application of agriculture. In section 2, the discussion is aboul the soft set and its different
lypes In

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 79

Scanned with
section 3, the discussion is about methodoloqy, which is used in the application of neutrosophic
soft matrices. In section 4 and 5, we discussed the algorithm and real-life example of an NSM.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, snme basics will be under discussion; to understand the concepts of paper, you must knnxv the
following.

2. 1 Snft Set [20]

Let K be a set of alternatives, and D is a set of attributes. Let P (K) denotes the set nf all subsets nf K and A is a
subset of D Then [F , A1 is called a sofl set over k xvhere F is a mapping given by F: A P tK) lo fact sn II set
(F , A is a family of subsets of K. For e e ñ , {F , A1 is defined as

(F , A) {F(e) e P [K): e C D , F{e) Q i/ e 8 A)

Example 2.1

Let K —— ( f . ft . f . f ) be a set of houses of different colors (paints) and D ——

\YeIlow (e/}, Green(e/), Sky b/ue(e/)) is a set of anributes UA (e/, e/} E D Let fiA’ (e/) = \f„ f/. f/) and
F (eg) (/„ f , f \ then the soft set(F , D) —— ((eg, (/ , ft, ft)), (eg, \f , ft, ft))), x'hich describes the colors of
houses. We write the soft set as follows

YeITou\ e,) Green(et) Sky blue(et)

0 l

0 1

0 l

2.2 Fuzzy Soft Set [2 I]

Let K be a universe, and D be a set o F attributes and any set A ñ D. Let P{K j denotes the set of all fuzzy sets of
K A set {Fg, D iS said to be fuzzy soft set overk such thnt Fg is a mapping given by F : D —+ P[K) such that
Fz te 1 —— ‹p ife g A u’here ‹p is a null fuzzy seL

Example 2.2

See example 2.1, ixe give membership value in 0 nr 1, but in FSS we choose membership value from interval
[0,1] instead of crisp numbers 0 and [Link]

FA te j ((/t, 0.2), (/„ 0.9), fq, 0.6)} is the fuzzy soft sets describe the colors of houses

YelTow{e/) Green(e/) Sky blue(e/)

0.5 0.0 0.2

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 80

Scanned with
 Z 0.3 00 0.0

y, ao 00 0.9

y aa 00 0.6

2.3 Fuzzy Sofi It latricrs (FS4 I) [18]

Let {Fg, D be a fuzzy sofi sei and K x D is de fined by a relation Gg - {(/ , e): e e A, f E Ng(e)} The funtl ion
of 6g 1s ¥tT tlten by nt2: K x D —• [0,1] xi here nt2 f , e) C [0 ,1] is the membership value.

lf [n,j] niy (/ , ey) then, the matrix is

Which is so ft matrix of soft set [F , D} over K called the fuzzy sofl malrix (FSS)

Exe mplc 2.3

Let K —— , f$, f$, f , f$ j is a universal set and D —— (e 1 , et, e„ e } is a set of all attributes then

A —— f• . et, e ) G D Then the soR set ( p , A) —— Fp te r ), Fp {e 1, Fp{e 1 j where

In(ez) = (J„ o.s), (/„ o.s), I . n.4), If , n.s), (fs. 0.2))

FD f• 3 - ((/j, 0. 2), (/„ 0.7)y (/3, 0.1), (/#, 0.3), (fs. 0.5))

Then, the sofi matrix n,j] is

0.5 0.3 0.0 0.2

0.3 0.6 0.0 0.7
[n = 0.1 0.4 0.0 D.1
0.Z 0.9 0.0 D.3
0.8 0.2 0.0 D.5

2.4 Nc ul rnsnpbic Soft Sci (NSS) [17]

Suppose K be a universe with an element in K denoted by f and D be a set of attributes. A neutrosophic set N over
K is characterized by a truthiness T2 , indeterminacy Iq, and a falsity i’alue Fz xvhere T2, I2 rind Fz are real
standard subsets of[0, 1]. And fg : D ••+ N[K )

There is no restriction on the sum of T ), 1 1, F 1 . *0ñ T f1+ (/) + F 1 ñ 3*

DOI:1O.5281/ZENODO. 3742406 81

Scanned with
EEC M}3lt 2.4

Let K m i f , f , f$, f, j be a set of houses of different colors (paints) and D ——

lYellow (et), Greente z , Sk y blue[ez } is a set of attributes I GB - {e1. e,) G D.

Let USB. ) - Fp(e d) = ( [f z, 0.5, 0.2,0.3), fz, 0.3,0.4,0.2), fz, 0.4,0.1,0.3))

Fg {e = ((/t, 0.2,0.4,0.3), (/„ 0.S,0.1, 0.4), (/„ 0.6, 0.3,0.1)} Which describes the colors of houses. We ss rite
the neutrosophic sofi set as folIous

Yellow{et ) Green(et) Sky blue(et )

0.5,0,2,0.3 0 0,0.0,0 0 0.2,0 4,0.3

/z b./. .4,0.2 0 0,0.0,0 0 0.0,0 0,0.0

y, 0.0,0.0,0.0 0 0,0.0,0 0 0.5,0 1,0.4

0.4,0.1,0.3 0 0,0.0,0 0 0.6,0 3,0 I

2.5 Ne ul rnsnpbic Soft A latrix (hSiYI)

Suppose K —— ( jz , fz, /z, .... . be the universe and D —— {ed. e z, e„ .... .} be a set of atti ibutes andf ñ D A set
[F , A be an NFS5 over K. Then the subsei o I K x D

Is defined as ftq = ((J , e); e e A, / e Fq(e)} which is the relation form of(Fq , D). The truthiness, indeterminacy
and fads ity values are:

T z : K x D —• [0 ,1] , Iz : K ›t D —+ [0 ,1] , Fz : K x D -+ [0 ,1]

Tz fi, e ) e [0,1] Jtq (/, e) e {0,1] , Fzg(/, e j e [fi,1] are the truthiness, indeterminacy, and falsity' off e K
for each e e D?

That is called m x n order neutrosophic soft matrix over K.

Example 2.5

Let K —— (J„ /„ J„ J„ J S J is a universal set and D —— [e„ et, e„ e ) is a set o I all attributes then

•
D (e ) - tJ t , D.5,0.2,0.2), Jt, 0.3,0.4,0.1), J„ 0.1,0.6,0.3), (/q, 0.2,0.3,0.5), . *.2,0.1,0.4)}

DOI:1O.5281/ZENODO. 3742406 82

Scanned with
Fz(e ) - (tf1. 0.3,0.S,0.1), . .6,0.2,0.2), (/t, 0.4,0.3,0.3), (/„ 0.3,0.1,0.S), (/t, 0.2,0.5,0.1))

FD f’4$ ' ((/@ 0. 2,0• 3 0.5), Mfz. •7 0•1 0.1), (/3 0•1,0.6, 0.3), (/#i 0.3,0.4,0.1), fz, 0.5,0.2t 0•2)).

Then, the neuFosophic soft matrix is

(0.S,0.2,0.2) (0.3,0.5,0.1) (0.0,0.0,0.0) (0.2,0.3,0.5)

(0.3,0.4,0.1) (0.6,[Link]) (0.0,0.0,0.0) (0.7,0.1,0.1)
(T,j, f;j, F;j)] - (0.1,0.6,0.3) (0.4,0.3,0.3) (0.0,0.0,0.0) (0.1,0.6,0.3)
(0.2,0.3,0.5) (0.3,0.1,0.S) (0.0,0.0, 0.0) (0.3,0.4,0.1)
(0.2,0.1,0.4) (0.2,0.5,0.1) (0.0,0.0, 0.0) (0.5,0.2,0.2)

2.6 Co mplc ment of Neutrosophic Soft 8 latrines

Suppose A - [(Tj; , I; j, F; j j] C NSM„„[Link] the complement of A is doted by A‘ and is defined as A° —— (F

j, 1 — fi;, T; j j] for all i and j.

Exe mple 2.6

See example 2.5

(0.2,0.8,0.5) (0.1,0.5,0.3} ([Link].0.0} (D.5,0.7,0.2)

(0.1,0.6,0.3) (0.2,0.8,0.6) ([Link].0.0) (0.1,0.9,0.7)
A" —— [(7;/# 1 /;jy ;tt] - (0.3,0.4y0.1) (0.3,0.7,0.4) ([Link].0.0) (0.3,0.4$0.1)
(0.5,0.7,0.2) (0.5,0.9,0.3) (0.0,0.0,0.0} (0.1,D.6,0.3)
(0.4,0.9,0.2) (0.1,0.5,0.2) (0.0,0.0,0.D} (0.2,D.B,0.5)

2.’7 Addition a f Neutrosophic Soft h1n triccs

A + B —— C —— max T‘ min r" for all i and j.

2.8 Su birartion of Neul rusnphic Sofl 8lairires

3.1 Vslue 8Ialrix

Suppose A —— [ T , I jj, F jj )J e NS3fp,g then, A is caIled the value of NSM denoted by V[A) and is defined by

V[A j —— [ T;^ 4 I — F*)] for all i and j, respectively Where i - 1,2,3..........m and y - 1,2,3.........n.

S.2 Score h fu trix

If A = [(zi}, I , F )] e NS IvI„,z g ,B [ T; , I , F )] e NSMz g. Then, the score matrix of A and B is denoted

by S[z z and is defined as S z gj = V tA j — V tB) ,

DOI:1O.5281/ZENODO. 3742406 83

Scanned with
3.3 Totsl Score

If A —— [('i"j , iiJ, F j ) ] e NS M,t, z g ,B —— [{T; , f , F )] C NSM„,z g. Then, their corresponding value matrix be
V{A 1,V t B ) and their scnre matrix bes( pj Then the total score fur each u; in U as

Let K is a set of farmers xs ho prnduces a qua!ity nf reheat for better health nf human beings to be chosen us the
best farmer. This whole process and selectinn of the farmers u’ill be made b}' agriculture experts, use of natural
resources, feriilizers and pesticides will be taken into account Suppose D is a set, svhich consists of parameters
relative to the harvested products by farmers First of all, compute NFSS(F2, D) over K shnxv the farmers
selection b}- agricultural experts T, Where F¿ is a mapping F2: D —+ N{K j , is the collectinn of all neutrosophic
subsets of K. Now, computation nf another NFSS(Gp, D1 over K demnnstrate farmers“ selection by the
aq•riculture experts from another field Z, Where Gp is a mapping6p: D —+ N tK), is the assortment of all
neutrosophic subsets nf K. Nnsv dex’elop the matrices A and B relative to the neutrosophic sofi sets (Fg, D)
and(Gp, D). Al so, compute the complement matrices A“ and B“ from the complements of neutrosophic soft set
tFz, D)’ and set[Gz, D1“, respectix'ely. After this, calculate d + B, the greater membership vnlue of farmers that
xvill be judged by the experts. Also, calculate A‘ y B‘, the maximum membership vat ue of non-seIected farmers
Now calculate value malices V A + B j and P{A* + B’s and scnre matrix Sp p p• g• And the total scnre S;
for each farmer in K. At

last Sq ma:x{S 1 determines that the farmer /t is selected as the best farmer by the experts.

4. Algorithm
Step 1: Compute the neutrosophic sofl set {Fz, D), (Sp, D1 and then find the NSMs A and B corresponding to the
{Fz, D land tGg, D) respectively

Step 2: Compute the neutrosophic soft complement sets [Fg. D1“, t G p, D ’ and compute the NSMs A‘an dB’
corresponding to the tFg, D1‘and tGg, D)‘ respectively.

Step 4: Calculate the tntal score S, r r each / in

Step 5: F indst max(S,), and then conclude the best farmer fz has the maximum value

Step 6: I f Sp has mnre than me vaiue, then repeat the step 1 and so repeat the complete process.

5 Application in Decision Making

As traditional mathematical methods are limited for solving problems, so researchers use different techniques
for prnblems involving dec ision-making. Neutrosophic sofi matrix (NS M) is one of thnse techniques that is used
in this paper as this tool is used by many researchers to solve their MCDM (M ulti-C riieria Decision Making)
problems. Let us try to solve an MCDM problem by using NSM. Suppose {Fz, D and (6g, D j are two NSS
showing the set nf four farmers who are selected from the unix’ersal set K —— (ft. lb. f .zf j by the experts T and

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 84

Scanned with
 Z. Suppose D —— (ct, en. ez j be the set of attributes representing the different manures like nature, fertilizer,
pesticides, etc will be considered to choose the best farmer by examining xvheat that is better for human health.
Step 1: Const rue lion of Neutrosophic Soft Sets

Fy(eg) = ( „ 0.5,0.2,0.2 ), {/„ 0.4,0.3.0. I ), (/„ 0.3,0.5,0.2 ). {/„ 0.6,0.Z,0.J )]

Fg te ) = ((/t, 0.2,0.4 0.3)d Lfz i .7t 0.2t 0.1)a (/„ 0.2,0.5,0.3)d f„ 0.4, 0.5,0.1))

Fz(e,) - ((/t, 0.6,0.1,d. )• (Hz. .5,0.1, .I). (/„ 0.3,0.5y0.2)d f$, 0.7,0.1,0. 2)a.

Gt(et) ((jF„ [Link],0,1), V . 4,[Link]}, („ 0.2,a.6,0.1). (/, a.s,o.z,o.i)}

Gp [ e ) = {(/t, 0.5, 0.3,0.2 ), J„ 0. 7,0.2,0.1 ), (/„ 0.4, 0.3,0.2 ), J„ 0.6,0.2,0.1 ))

Gt (et) ((/t, 0.4,0.2,0.3), (/„ 0.2,0.5,0.3), „ [Link],0.2), (/„ 0.7,0.2,0.1)).

These are neutrosophic soft matrices of above sofi sets:

(0.5,0.2,0.2) (0.2,0.4,D.3) (0.6,0.1,0.2)

(0.4,0.3,0.1) (0.7,0.2,0.1) (0.5,0.3,0.2)
(0.3,0.5,0.2) (0.2,0.5,0.3) (0.3,0.S,0.2)
(0.6,0.2,0.1) (0.4,0.5,0.1) (0.7,0.1,0.2)

(0.6,0.3,0.1) (0.5,0.3,0.2) (0.4,0.2,0.4)

B —— (0.4,0.3,0.2) (0.7,0.2,0.1) (0.2,0.5,0.3)
(0.2,0.6,0.1) (0.4,0.3,0.2) (0.6,0.2,0.2)
(0.1,0.5,0.2) (0.6,0.2,0.1) (0.7,0.2,0.1)
Step 2

Then, the neutrosophic soft complement matrices cre

(0.2,0.8,0.5) (0.3,0.6,0.2) (0.2,0.9,0.6)

(0.1,[Link]) (0.1,0.8,0.7) (0.2,0.7,0.5)
(0.2,0.5,0.3) (fi.3,0.5,0.2) (0.2,0.5,0.3)
(0.1,0.8,0.6) (0.1,0.5,0.4) (0.2,0.9,0.7)

(0.1,0.7,0.6) (0.2,0.7,0.5} (0.3,0.B,0.4)

(0.2,0.7,0.4) (0.1,0.8,0.7} (0.3,0.5,0.2)
(0.1,0.4,D.2) (0.2,0. 7,0.4) (0.2, 0.8,0.6)
(0.2,0.5,D.1) (0.1,0.B,0.6) (0.1, D.8,0.7)

(0.6,0.25,0.1) (0.5,0.35,0.2) (0.6,0.15,0.2 )

(J -I- B) —— (0.4,0.3,0.1) (0.7,0.2,0.1) (0.5,0.4,0.2)
(0.3,D.55,0.1) (0.4,0.4,0.2) (0.6,0.35,0.2)
(0.6, D.35,0.1) (0.6,0.35,0.1) (0.7,0.15,0.1)

(0.2,0.7S.0.S) (0.3,[Link]) (0.3,0.8S,0.4)

(0.2,0.7,0.4) (0.1,0.8,0.7) (0.3,0.6,0.2)
(0.2,0.6,0.2) (0.3,0.6,0.2) (0.2,0.6S,0.3)
(0.2,0.65,0.1) (0.1, [Link]) (0.2,0.85,0.71)

DOI:1O.5281/ZENODO. 3742406 85

Scanned with
 0.75 D.65 0.55
VAA -I- B) — 0.6 0.8 0.7
0.75 0.6 0.75
0.B5 [Link] 0.75

0.45 0.75 0.75

'i (A' + B°) —— 0.5 D.2 D.7
0.6 D.7 0.55
0.75 0.35 0.35
Now calculate score matrix us

0.3 —0.1 —0.2

0.1 0.6 0
0.15 —0.1 0.2
0.1 0.5 0.4

Step 4: Tn find the Total Score

D.0
Tofal Score : D.7
D.25
1.0
Step 5: Bist Selection using highest score

S = 1.0

As ue can see above the last value is maximum so the farmer fi, has gain more score so the farmer h, is selected
as bear farmer by the experts.

6. CDOclusiOn
In this paper, the concept of neutrnsophic sofi matrices has been described, and the application of some nexv
operations has been tesied through neutrosophic soft matrices. A possible application has been tackled through
the usage of NSM, which will not only prnve useful by itsel f but will help researchers to solve other problems of
uncertainties through similar procedures. The following paper demonstrated a neu’ solution procedure to solve
neutrosophic soft sets based on real-!ife decision-makin•p problems. This procedure prnves quite feasible in many
real-I ife scenarios where ease of decision-making is the goal in mind.

REFERENCES

[I] Zadeh , L.A. “Fuzzy sets,” Informatinn and control, 8, pp.338-353, 1965

[2] Yang, X. B., Lin, T Y., Yang, J. Y., Li, Y. and Yu, D “Combination nf interval-valued fuzzy set and
soft set,” Computers and Mathematics u’ith applications, 58(3), pp 521-527, 2009.
[3] Pass'lak, Z. “Rough set the or) and its Applications to data anal}'sis,” Cyberneucs and Systems, 29(7),
pp.661-668, 1998.

[4] Atanassov, K.T. ‘“lntuitionisiic fuzzy set,* Fuzzy sets and systems, 20(1), pp.86 -87, 1986.
[5] Sinarandache, F. “A unifying Field in Logics. Neutrnsophy; Neutrosophic probability, Set arid Logic,”
Rehoboth, American Research Press, 1998.

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 86

Scanned with
 [6] Molndtsnv , D “Soft Set Theory First Results,"' Computer and Mathematics with applicatinns, 37, pp. 19-
31, 1999
[7] Maj i. P. K., BinxaS, R and Roy, A.R, “Fuzzy soft sets,” The Journal of fuzzy Mathematics, 9(3), pp.589-
602, 2001.

[8] Maj i, P. k., B iswns, R. and Roy, A.R. “Intuitionislic Fuzzy snff sets,” Journal of fuzzy mathematics, 12,
pp.669-683, 2004.
[9] Cagman, N and Enginngl u, S “Sofi set-Theory and imiting Decision Making,” Euinpeari Journal of
Operational Researck20{7), pp.848-855, 2010

[10] Cheitia, B. and Das, P.K, “Some results n F intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrix thenry,” Advances in appl ied
Science Research, 3(l ), pp.412-423, 2012
[11] Mondal, I.J and Ro)' ,T K, “Some Properties nn intuitioniHic Fuzzy Soft matrices,” International Journal
of Mathematics Research 3(2), pp 267-276, 2013.

[12] Mondal, I.J, and Roy.T. K. “Intuitipnistic Fuzzy Sofi Matrix theory and multi criteria in decision makinp•
base on T-Nomi operators, ” Mathematics and Statistics, 2(2), pp.55-61, 2014.
[13] Maj i, [Link], “ Neutrosophic soft set,"’ Annuals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 5(1), pp
157-168, 2013.
[l4] Broumi, S , Del i, I., Smarandache, F “Interva! valued Neutrosophic Parameterized Sofl Set theory and
its decisinn making,” Journal of new results in science, 7, pp.58-7 1, 2014
list Broumi, S., Del i, I., Smarnndache, F. “ Relations on interval valued NeutrnsophiK SOft sets,"’ Journal of
Neix' results in science, 3(5), pp. 0-1. 2014.
[16] Broumi, S , Mumtaz, A , Smarandache, F “Mappings on Neutrosophic soft Expert sets,” Journal of nexv
theory, 5, pp.26-42, 20 IS.
[17] Debt, I , Broumi, S. “ Neutrosophic sofi sets and neutrosophic sofl matrices based nn decisinn making,“
Jnumal of Intelligence and fuzzy Systems, 28, pp 2233-2241, 2014.
[18] Jafar, N M., Faizu!lah, Shnbb ir., S, Alvi, F. M.S, Shaheen, L. “1nluitionistic Fuzzy Sofi
Matrices, Cnmpl iments and Their Relations sx’ith Comprehensive Study of Medical D iagnosis,”
International Journal of Latest Engineering Research and Applicatinns, 5(1), pp. 23-30, 2020.

Jafar, N M., Muniba, K., Saeed, A., Abbas, S., Bibi, I. “Appl ination of Sanchez’s Approach to Disease
Identification Msin•p Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers,” International Journal of Latest Engineering Research
arid Applications, 4(9), pp.51-57, 2019.
[20] Jafar, N. M., Saqlain, M., Saeed, M , Abbas, Q. “Appl icalion of Soft-Set Relations and Soft Matrices in
Medical Diagnosis using Sanchez’s Apprnach, ” International Journal of Computer Applications,
177(32}, pp 7- 11, 2020.
[2 I] Riaz, M., Saeed, M., Saqlain, M., Jafar, N. “Impacl nf Water Hardness in Instinctive Laundry System
Based on Fuzzy Lop•ic Controller,” Punjab University Journnl of Mathematics, 51(4), pp.73-g4, 2019.
[22] Saqlain, M., Jafar, N., Riffat, A. “Smart Phone Selection by Consumers’ In Pakistan: FMCGDM Fuzzy
Mm iiple Criteria Group Decision Making Approach,” Gomal University Jnurnal of Research, 3J (I),
pp.27-31.

DOI:1O.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 B7

Scanned with
 [23] Saqlaiq M., Jafar. N, Hamid, R, Shahzad, A. “ Predictinn of Cricket Wnrld Cup 2019 by TO PSIS
Technique nf MCDM-A MathflMatfKal Analysis,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering
Research, 10{2), pp 789-792, 20 l9.

[24] Saqlain, M., Naz, K, Ghaffar, Jafar, N.M “Fuzzy Logic ConUoller: The Impact of Water pH on
Detergents,” Scientific Inquiry of Review 3(3), pp. 16-29, 2019.

[2s] Saqlain, M., Saeed, J'vl., Ahmad, M. R., 8marandache, F. “Genemlization of TOPS IS for Neutrosophic
Hypersofi set using Accuracy Function and its Appl ination,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems (NSS), 27,
pp.131-137, 2019.

[26] Saeed, M., Zulqarnain, M. and Dayan, F. ‘TO PSIS analysis for the prediction of diabetes based on
geneml characteristics of humans,” Int. J. of Pharm Sc i. and Research 9, pp. 2932-2939, 2018.
[27] Mustafa, A.B N., Ahmed, K.S , Al i, Z., Yit, B.W., Abidin, Z.A. A„ Shariff, M.A Z., “Agriculture
produce sorting and grading using suppon vector machines and Fuzzy logtc,” IEEE International
Conference on signal and image Applications, 2009.
Papagorgiou, 1 E., Aggelopoulou, D. K , Gemtos, A.T., Nanos, D.G, “Yield predictinn in Apples using
fuzzy cognitive map learning Apprnach,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 91, pp. I 9-29, 2013
[29] Raj, V A and Riganabanu, A “An Appd icalion of Inten'al valued fuzzy matrices for finding the disease
in plants,” International journBI of computing algorithm, 3(3), pp.202-204, 2014.
[30] Neamtollahi, E., Vafabakshi, K., Jahansuz, R kt. Sharifzadeh, F. “Agricultural optima cropp ing pattern
determinatinn based on fuzzy system,”’ Fiizzy information and engtneering, 9, pp.479-49 1, 201 7.
[31] Mota, C V, Damasceno, A F, Leite, F. D, “Fuzz y clustering and fiizzy validity’ measures for knoxv1edg•e
discovery and decision making in agricultural engineering,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,
1 TO, pp, 1 18-124, 2018
[32] Loganathan, C., Pushpalatha, V ”An applicaDon of interval valued fuzzy matrices in agricultural field,”
International journal of mathematics and its applications, 6(3), pp 387-397, 2o 1s
[33] Savarimutliu, J.S.M., MW akshmi, S T. “On T-conorm and weighted T-conorm operators nn
inluilionistic fuzzy snft matrix and its applicattnn of multi-criteria decision making in agriculture,"’
International journaJ of apps ied engineering research, 14(3), 2019.

[34] Edalatpanah, S. A “A Direct Model for Triangular Neutrosophic Linear Progmmming,” International
Journal of Neutrosophic Science, Vnlume 1 , Issue 1, pp I 9-28 , 2020.
[35] Christianto, V., Smarandache, F., “‘Remark on Artificial IntelligenKe, humanoid and Terminator
scenario A Neutrosophic way to fuluro logy,” International Journal nf Neutrosophic Science, Vol ume I ,
Issue 1, pp.8-13 , 2020
[36] Smarandache, F., “NeutroAl gebra is a Generalization of Partial Algebra,” International Journal of
Neutrosophic Science, Vnlume 2 , Issue 1, pp 08-17 , 2020.
[37] Schweizer, P. “Uncenainty: twn probabilities for the three states of neutrosophy,” Internatinna! Journal
of Neutrosophic Science, Volume 2 , Issue 1, pp. I 8-26 , 2020.

DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.37424D6 88

Scanned with