Understanding Motivation in Organizations

The Nature of Motivation

Motivation is defined as the set of forces that leads people to behave in particular ways. Job performance
(P ) is influenced by motivation (M ), ability (A), and the environment (E ), represented by the formula:
P =M ×A×E

For high performance, an employee needs to:

Want to do the job well (motivation).

Be able to do the job effectively (ability).
Have the necessary materials, resources, equipment, and information (environment).

Motivational Framework

The motivational process occurs as follows:

1. Need Deficiencies: People experience a need deficiency, which is anything they require or want that
is currently lacking.
2. Search for Ways to Satisfy Needs: A need deficiency triggers attempts to satisfy the need.
3. Choice of Goal-Directed Behaviors: Individuals choose behaviors aimed at satisfying their need
deficiencies.
4. Enactment of Behavioral Choice (Performance): The chosen behaviors are performed.
5. Experienced Rewards or Punishment: The consequences of the behavior are experienced.
6. Reassessment of Need Deficiencies: An assessment is made of the extent to which the outcome
addressed the original need deficiency.

Historical Perspectives on Motivation

Traditional Approach: Assumes employees are primarily motivated by money (e.g., scientific
management).
Human Relations Approach: Suggests that creating a false sense of employee involvement in
decision-making can lead to positive attitudes and motivation.
Human Resource Approach: Assumes employees want to contribute and are capable of making
genuine contributions.

1/6
Need-Based Perspectives on Motivation

These theories assume that need deficiencies drive behavior.

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

This theory proposes that human needs are arranged in a hierarchy of importance, with five basic
categories:

Deficiency Needs (Basic Needs): Must be satisfied for survival and fundamental comfort.
Physiological Needs (e.g., base salary)
Security Needs (e.g., pension plan)
Belongingness Needs (e.g., friends in work group)
Growth Needs: Focus on personal growth and development.
Esteem Needs (e.g., job title)
Self-Actualization Needs (e.g., challenging job)

Critiques of Maslow's Model:

The hierarchy does not generalize well across cultures.

The levels of needs are not always present or distinct.
The strict hierarchy is not always followed.

ERG Theory

This theory expands on Maslow's by describing three sets of needs: Existence, Relatedness, and Growth.

More than one need can motivate a person simultaneously.

It includes satisfaction-progression and frustration-regression components.

Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory

This theory distinguishes between two sets of workplace factors:

Motivation Factors: Intrinsic to the work itself, affecting satisfaction.

Achievement
Recognition
The Work Itself
Responsibility
Advancement and Growth

2/6
 Hygiene Factors: Extrinsic to the work, determining dissatisfaction.
Supervision
Working Conditions
Interpersonal Relationships
Pay and Job Security
Company Policies

Key Distinction: Unlike the traditional view where satisfaction and dissatisfaction are on a single
continuum, Herzberg proposed two separate dimensions: one ranging from satisfaction to no satisfaction
(motivation factors), and another from dissatisfaction to no dissatisfaction (hygiene factors).

Acquired Needs Framework

This framework centers on three primary acquired needs:

Need for Achievement: The desire to accomplish tasks more effectively than in the past.
Need for Affiliation: The need for human companionship.
Need for Power: The desire to control resources in one's environment.

Process-Based Perspectives on Motivation

These theories focus on how people behave in their efforts to satisfy needs.

Expectancy Theory

This theory suggests that people are motivated by how much they want something and the likelihood they
perceive of getting it. The key components are:

Effort-to-Performance Expectancy: The perceived probability that effort will lead to performance.
Performance-to-Outcome Expectancy (Instrumentality): The perceived probability that
performance will lead to certain outcomes.
Outcome: Anything that results from performing a behavior.
Valence: The degree of attractiveness or unattractiveness (value) that a particular outcome has for a
person.

Basic Expectancy Model Components: An individual's performance is determined by the interaction of

effort-to-performance expectancy, performance-to-outcome expectancy, outcomes (with associated
valence), as well as environment and ability.

Porter-Lawler Model: This extension of expectancy theory suggests that satisfaction is determined by the
perceived equity of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards for performance, and that satisfaction is a consequence
of performance, not a cause.

3/6
Evaluations of Expectancy Theory:

It has been widely tested but is complex to test due to its multiple components.
People are motivated if they value the expected rewards and believe their efforts will lead to
performance.

Equity Theory

This theory focuses on people's desire to be treated with perceived fairness and to avoid perceived
unfairness.

Equity: The belief that one is being treated fairly in relation to others.
Inequity: The belief that one is being treated unfairly in relation to others.

Equity Comparison Process: People compare their input-to-outcome ratio with that of others:
Outcomes (self) Outcomes (other)
Inputs (self)
​ compared with Inputs (other)
​

Responses to Perceived Inequity: If inequity is perceived, individuals are motivated to reduce it through
various strategies:

1. Change Inputs (e.g., reduce effort).

2. Change Outcomes (e.g., ask for a raise).
3. Alter Perceptions of Self (e.g., convince themselves they are less skilled).
4. Alter Perceptions of Other (e.g., convince themselves the other person is less skilled).
5. Change Comparisons (e.g., compare to someone else).
6. Leave the Situation (e.g., quit).

If equity is perceived, individuals are motivated to maintain the current situation.

Learning-Based Perspectives on Motivation

These perspectives focus on how behavior changes as a result of experience.

Learning Theories

Classical Conditioning: A simple form of learning that links a conditioned response with an
unconditioned stimulus.
Operant Conditioning (Reinforcement Theory): Behavior is a function of its consequences. People
consciously choose behaviors that lead to desirable outcomes.
Social Learning: People observe others' behaviors, recognize the consequences, and adjust their own
behavior accordingly. This requires the observed behavior to be relatively simple and concrete.

4/6
Reinforcement Theory

This theory is based on the idea that behavior is a function of its consequences.

Types of Reinforcement Schedules:

Fixed-Ratio: Behavior is reinforced after a constant number of behaviors.

Variable-Ratio: Behavior is reinforced after a varying number of behaviors.
Fixed-Interval: Behavior is reinforced based on a constant time schedule.
Variable-Interval: Behavior is reinforced after varying time intervals.

Research Findings: Variable reinforcement schedules are generally the most effective for sustaining a
behavior.

Behavior Modification: The application of reinforcement theory to influence behaviors in organizational

settings.

Positive Reinforcement: Using rewards or desirable consequences after a behavior to increase its
frequency.
Negative Reinforcement (Avoidance): Providing an opportunity to avoid or escape an unpleasant
circumstance after a behavior to increase its frequency.
Punishment: Applying unpleasant or aversive consequences to decrease the likelihood of a behavior.
Extinction: Decreasing the frequency of a behavior by eliminating a reward or desirable consequence
that follows it.

Nature of Reinforcement: Reinforcement can involve presenting or removing a stimulus, and the stimulus
can be positive or negative.

Positive Reinforcement: Presenting a positive stimulus to increase behavior.

Negative Reinforcement: Removing a negative stimulus to increase behavior.
Punishment: Presenting a negative stimulus to decrease behavior.
Extinction: Removing a positive stimulus to decrease behavior.

Individual Differences and Motivation

Self-Efficacy

Task-Specific Self-Efficacy: A person's beliefs in their capabilities to perform the specific actions
required to accomplish a task.
Magnitude: Beliefs about how difficult a task can be accomplished.
Strength: Beliefs about how confident the person is that the specific task can be accomplished.
Generality: Beliefs about the degree to which similar tasks can be accomplished.

5/6
Applying Motivation Theories to Managerial Challenges

Different motivation theories can be applied to address various managerial challenges:

Low-cost business strategy but needs to motivate employees: Self-Efficacy, Needs theories,
Expectancy Theory, Equity Theory, Reinforcement Theory.
Employee feels unable to meet performance goals: Self-Efficacy, Expectancy Theory.
Employee feels underpaid relative to coworkers: Equity Theory.
Employee engages in inappropriate behavior: Reinforcement Theory (punishment/extinction).
Talented employee is not feeling challenged: Needs theories (growth needs), Herzberg's Two-
Factor Theory (motivation factors), Expectancy Theory.
Work is repetitive and employees find it boring/hard to stay motivated: Needs theories,
Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, Reinforcement Theory.

Motivating the Right Behavior (Behavior Modification Steps)

1. Define the problem: Identify what needs improvement.

2. Identify and define specific behaviors: Clearly state the target behaviors to be changed.
3. Record and track the target behavior: Monitor the occurrence of the behavior.
4. Analyze consequences: Understand the negative consequences of undesired behavior and arrange
for positive consequences to follow desired behavior.
5. Evaluate improvement: Assess whether the behavior has improved and by how much.

6/6