Design Management
Design Management
IFR Issued for Review INF Issued for Information Z As Built CAN Cancelled
Scope:
This procedure covers the process of design review starting at the point of issue of the design
brief to the Consultant and finishing at the point of approval of the design documents as ready
to be incorporated into an RFP for Construction Contract.
Contents:
KAFD APPROVAL
Design Consultant
Project Director
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
Design brief,
1. Owner's Representative prepares design brief, site location and location &
affection plan and special terms & conditions and send to PMC P affection plan,
terms &
conditions
3. Design Consultants carry out the concept design stage and submit
R P Initial Concept
Comments
8. Owner's Representative reviews and makes recommendation Final Concept
P
recommendation to Senior Management for final acceptance. design
KEY
Owner's Representative
Construction Manager
P S R
Contracts Manager
Technical Manager
Perform Start Review
Design Consultant
Project Director
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
X X X Attend meeting
1. Owner issues design brief to design consultant with copy to PMC Design brief
I
RFP to designer includes the design stages:
Concept Design
Schematic Design i
Advanced Preliminary & Detailed Designs
BOQ and Tender Documents
Construction drawings & specification
Design stage
2. Designer carries out design stage & submits i P submittal
5. PMC prepare design review report which consists of: Design review
R R R P report
Narrative + conclusions + completed checklists + summary of
specialist comments
9. PMC issue minutes of meeting along with a Instruction to Proceed i I i i i Meeting minutes
i
with incorporating comments
Design stage
10. Designer incorporates comments, completes sign-off and re-submits i P submittal
Architectural
Mechanical
Specialist
Structural
Electrical
Deliverable
Details Remarks
[Link] Provide technical specifications for wind tunnel program, Initiate primary
wind tunnel testing with the development of site-specific wind environment Document 8
and initial structural force balance testing
Example is based
[Link] Prepare final geotechnical engineering investigation, issue report and make
recommendations in respect thereof on a specific RFP Document 8
[Link] Provide preliminary design including framing and foundation plans and
typical details Document 9
[Link] Develop floor plans for each level and rooms and apartments layouts and
mixes for various floor plans to maximize area efficiency including indicative For finishes see [Link] &
AS 9 [Link]
furniture and proposed finishes
[Link] Develop exterior elevations / building sections to illustrate the scope of the For finishes see [Link] &
g , defining
design, g finishes and materials. AS 9 [Link]
[Link] Design layouts and coordinated indicative furniture plans for each floor
including public areas, i.e. front of house, reception, concierge areas, back
of house, kitchen storage and mechanical rooms, and ancillary rooms
AS 9 9
including but not limited to health club and restaurant and parking areas.
[Link] Design parking layouts with circulation, entry and exit ramping system in line
with local regulations. AS 9
[Link] Prepare schedule of preliminary finishes Principle finishes, see also
AS 9 [Link]
[Link] Prepare vertical transportation studies inc. all disciplines. See
Document 8 notes
[Link] Develop Preliminary layouts for cores and shafts AS 9 9
[Link] Prepare a preliminary design report, summarizing the design development,
preliminary design details, outline specification for submission to the Owner Document
for his approval
3.2.2 Deliverables (The Preliminary Design Report shall include but not be limited to
the following deliverables)
Architectural
Mechanical
Specialist
Structural
Electrical
Deliverable
Details Remarks
[Link] Updated accommodation, offices, retail and building amenity schedule with
areas Document 9
[Link] List of specialized equipment and systems with bulk MEP loads Document See item [Link]
[Link] Building Services (MEP) scheme report with key schematic drawings Doc / Dwgs 9 Some missing
[Link] Structural scheme report with Gas (1:100) and sections (1:200), showing
primary members (1:100 / 1:200) 8 Gas = GA's
[Link] Updated Building services (MEP) Conceptual Work Statement and Basis of
Design Document Document 9
[Link] Updated Structural Conceptual Work Statement and Basis of Design
Document Document 8
[Link] Vertical Transportation Study inc. all necessary info from
Document 8 various disciplines
[Link] Acoustic report Document 8 8 8
[Link] Waste disposal study Document 8 8 8
[Link] Fire / life safety report See also items [Link], 16 &
Document 8 30. See notes
[Link] Loading Docks AS 8
[Link] Food Service AS No central food service
[Link] Bridge Connecting Car Park Structure to Building - Plan & Sections AS 9 8
[Link] Conceptual Interior Design for all public spaces AS 9
Architectural
Mechanical
Specialist
Structural
Electrical
Deliverable
Details Remarks
Architectural
Mechanical
Specialist
Structural
Electrical
Deliverable
Details Remarks
Notes:
1. The report does not contain a Fire / Life Safety Report covering all aspects of building Fire / Life Safety issues and across all disciplines. It should be
noted however that this requirement is partially satisfied by the submission of Mechanical & Electrical Fire Protection / Fire Alarm & Detection system
details.
2. Vertical transportantion report and analysis to incorporate all related, discipline specific issues.
3. Construction cost estimate not provided at this design stage.
Review/Comments:
THIS FORM WILL BE ATTACHED BY THE REVIEWER TO THE SUBMITTAL FORM DURING THE
SUBMITTAL REVIEW PROCESS.
Result of Review:
Signature:
Name Date: DD/MMM/YYYY
Job Title / Company
If design management is part of PMC scope the following sets of records are required to be produced
and maintained.
2. Stage reviews
3. Design Verification
Records that verification that the design outputs have met the design input requirements.
4. Design Validation
Confirmation that the final design is capable of meeting the specified requirements and its
intended use.
All design changes shall be recorded, reviewed, verified and validated. Records are to be
maintained.
KEY
Owner's Representative
Construction Manager
Document Controller
P S R
Technical Manager
Perform Start Review
Design Consultant
Resident Engineer
Project Director
Contractor
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
X X X Attend meeting
4. PMC Technical Manager & team compile & issue comments on form P
9. Repeat steps 2-8 until Construction drawings are ready for issue to
the Contractor
Construction
8. PMC issues Construction Drawings (signed & stamp by Design
i R P i Drawing Issue
i
Consultant) via a Transmittal to the Contractor and Resident Engineer
Supervision Consultant
P Perform A Assist R Review
PM / CM TEAM
Receive copy D Decide I Issue
Contractor
i
4. The CM receives the submittal with Hard & Soft copy (No. as
indicated in the contract) and:
₋ Check Conformity with the requirement and stamp for receipt R P Submittal
₋ Update information in Expedition (Status, date, BIC…etc.)
₋ Check uploading of soft copy on Expedition
II
₋ Alert Design Manager through Expedition P
I ₋ Send copies to Supervision Consultant for review
I
II ₋ Determine if needed to be reviewed by the Owner R
KEY
Owner's Representative
Supervision Engineer
Concerned Manager
P S R
Technical Manager
Perform Start Review
Design Consultant
Project Manager
QA/QC Manager
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
The Contractor may request a Design Field Change to alter the design
due to on site conditions or product availablity. This request is to be used
only when immediate approval is required and there are NO COST or
TIME related implications
has been carried out internally. Contractor then forwards this form to the
to the Supervision Engineer.
Completed Design
4. On reciept of all comments, concerned Project Manager completes form P Field Change
PP-DM-04-FM and makes recommendation and attaching all comments to Form
No………….
Supervision Engineer
i i
Engineer: Date:
EXISTING CONDITION:
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE:
CONTRACTOR’S REVIEW
FUNCTION: ORIGINATOR DEPT HEAD QA/QC REVIEW ENGINEERING MANAGER
NAME:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
To be used only when the changes requested need immediate approval and carry
NO COST and/or TIME related implications
Owner's Representative
P Perform S Start R Review
Project Director
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
2 PMC Technical Manager calls a workshop to be attended by the Design Consultants, and PMC team members P
3 The workshop, chaired by the Design Consultant, is to provide the PMC Technical Manager & team with an understanding & appreciation of
the factors that have influenced the project design. It identifies the difficulties that have been encountered during the design. The Design X X
Consultant shall present the description of the rationale, evolution, constraints, assumptions and alternatives for the major design criteria
and components. The Design Consultant shall designate a contract person to answer any questions and shall designate a contract person
to answer any questions
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS PHASE - DAY 4
4 PMC Technical Manager & team carries out functional analysis to separate Value Engineering from direct cost reduction techniques. The
functional analysis approach arrives at the basic purpose of the various systems and subsystems and aids in determining the least cost to P
perform the basic and secondary function, and identifies the costs that can be reduced or eliminated without affecting the performance or
reliabilty of the function.
Functional Analysis shall be completed as follows:
a. Identify the study area
b. Identify the basic function(s) of the study area
c. List the component parts of the study area
d. List the function of each component and sub component
e. Identify whether each function is basic , secondary or required secondary function
f. Identify the estimated construction cost of each function
g. Specu
g Speculate
ate oon tthe
e worth
o t or
o the
t e least
east cost to acco
accomplish
p s tthe
e sa
same
e function
u ct o
CREATIVE PHASE - DAY 5
5 PMC Technical Manager & team uses the Creative Phase to identify alternative ideas for accomplishing the function of the systems or subsystem P
associated with the specific study area. The ideas shall be listed by system, subsystem and component to faciltate effective organisation of the
study.
EVALUATION PHASE - DAY 6
6 PMC Technical Manager & team evaluates the feasibilty of each idea developed in the Creative Phase by identifying its advantages &
disadvantages. The ideas are the rated on a scale of 1 to 5. 5 presents a good or excellent idea with the potential for cost saving and value P
improvement. The ideas with highest ratings are selected for a more detailed level of development in the Development Phase
In rate ideas the PMC Technical Manager & team shall consider the folowing:
a. Are the aesthetic, performance , quality and reliabilty requirements met or exceeded?
b. Will excessive redesign or project delay be created?
c. Is there an improvement in operation & maintenance?
d. Will life cycle cost saving be achieved?
e. Does the idea have a reasonable chance of acceptance & implementation?
total cost saving, followed by a brief description of the VE Proposals highlighting the three best proposals for each discipline. A draft
summary of the VE Proposals shall be provided to the Design Consultant, Owner and PMC Project Director so they can start their review & X X X X
analysis prior to receipt of the Value Engineering Report
VALUE ENGINEERING REPORT
9 PMC Technical Manager shall prepare a written report summarising the results of the entire VE Study. The report shall be prepared and
submitted within one week following the presentation and contain the following: P
a. Project name and general description and summary of function
b. Scope of Value Engineering Study
c. Names of Owner, Design Consultant, PMC Design Team, PMC representatives
d. Location and date of the Workshop I VE Report
KEY
Contracts Manager
Perform S Start R Review
Design Consultant
Project Director
Contractor
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
1 After receipt of the Value Engineering Proposals, PMC Project Director call a meeting between all P
concerned parties. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each
VE Proposal
2 The meeting is held and chair by PMC Project Director, and the attendees develop a preliminary list of
VE Proposals which can be adopted immediately and those which will be implemented if the X X X X X X
proposals prove to be feasible
List of adopted
3 PMC Project Director organises the minute of the meeting and issues the lists to all concerned parties I VE Proposals &
MOM
i i i i i
4 The Design Consultant, conducts a detailed review of these Value Engineering Proposals to confirm
P
technical feasibility, cost to redesign, cost savings. The VE Proposals which are rejected by the Design
Consultant shall be fully documented with a technical analysis to explain reasons for rejection.
5 The Design Consultant presents the results of his feasibility study in report form to all concerned parties, Report of
including
c ud g aall deta
detailes
es o
of tthe
e rejected
ejected VE Proposals,
oposa s, for
o review.
e e I Feasibility of
VE Proposals
R R R R
6 After consulting with PMC Project Director, Contracts Manager and Technical Manager, Owner's
Representative identifies which VE Proposals appear to be most suitable for imlementation and P
forwards recommendation to Owner's Senior Management
7 Owner Executive Projects Director reviews & recommends to Owner's Senior Management
R
9 Senior Management notifies Project Director of approval of VE Proposal & New Budget
I
10 Owner's Representative instructs Controls Manager to incorporate new budget into system and instructs GO TO VARIATION
Design Consultant to incorporate approved VE Proposals, and PMC to raise Variation Order Proposal P ORDER i i
for both Design Consultant and Contractor (refer to PP-VR-01-PM or PP-VR-02-PM, PP-VR-09-PM) PROCEDURES
11 Owner's Project Controls Manager Incorporate New Budget into project and informs Finiancial Revised
Department to update the budget. P Project
Budget
12 Owner's Project Controls Manager notifies PMC if the Project Director decides P
Owner's Representative
Construction Manager
P Perform S Start R Review
Contractor
i Receive copy D Decide I Issue
1 The Contractor may at any time, carry out Value Engineering, which will P
(1) Accelerate completion
(2) Reduce the cost to the Owner of executing, maintaining or operating of the Work
(3) Improve the efficiency or value to the Owner of the Completed Works
(4) otherwise be of benefit to the Owner
2 The Contractor submits the Value Engineering Proposal (at his own cost) to the Engineer , P
ensuring the following are incorporated in the Contract Clause
a. A description of the proposed work to be perfromed and a programme for its execution
b. A proposal for any necessary modifications to the Contractor's programme and to the
Time for Completion
i i i I VE Report
c
c. The proposal for evaluation of the Variation with copies to PM/CM and Design Consultant
Consultant.
The report is to be issued to Owner, PM/CM Senior Management, and Design Consultant
for review and comment (5 copies)
3 Owner Engineer, PM/CM and Design Consultancy shall review each proposal
R R R
4 Engineer request PM/CM to call a meeting between all concerned parties. The purpose of the
meeting is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each VE Proposal.
D P
5 Follow procedure for the Implementation of Value Engineering (refer to in Procedure PP-DM-11-
PM)
GO TO IMPLEMENTATION
OF VALUE ENGINEERING
PROCEDURES