0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Solved Examples

The document discusses the Rankine power cycle, including both ideal and actual cycles, with detailed calculations for thermal efficiency, work output, and heat input. It highlights the differences in efficiency between the ideal and actual cycles, as well as the impact of boiler pressure and temperature on efficiency. Additionally, it covers variations such as the ideal reheat and regenerative Rankine cycles, noting improvements in thermal efficiency and moisture content.

Uploaded by

bhdrgncg34
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Solved Examples

The document discusses the Rankine power cycle, including both ideal and actual cycles, with detailed calculations for thermal efficiency, work output, and heat input. It highlights the differences in efficiency between the ideal and actual cycles, as well as the impact of boiler pressure and temperature on efficiency. Additionally, it covers variations such as the ideal reheat and regenerative Rankine cycles, noting improvements in thermal efficiency and moisture content.

Uploaded by

bhdrgncg34
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

RANKINE POWER CYCLE- SOLVED EXAMPLES


1- The simple ideal Rankine cycle

Assumptions: 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Kinetic and potential energy changes are
negligible.
Analysis We note that the power plant operates on the ideal Rankine cycle. Therefore, the pump
and the turbine are isentropic, there are no pressure drops in the boiler and condenser, and steam
leaves the condenser and enters the pump as saturated liquid at the condenser pressure.
(a) From the steam tables (Tables A-4, A-5, and A-6),
h1 = hf@75kPa = 384.44 kJ/kg
𝜐1 = 𝜐𝑓@75kPa = 0.001037 m3 /kg

wp = 𝜐1 ×(𝑃2 − 𝑃1 )

= (0.001037m3 /kg)(3000 − 75)kPa


= 3.03 kJ/kg
h2 = h1 + wp = 384.44 + 3.03 = 387.47 kJ/kg
𝑃3 = 3 MPa ℎ3 = 3116.1 kJ/kg
}
𝑇3 = 350 ℃ 𝑠3 = 6.7450 kJ/kgK
𝑃4 = 75 kPa 𝑠4 − 𝑠𝑓@75kPa 6.7450 − 1.2132
} 𝑥4 = = = 0.886
𝑠4 = 6.7450 kJ/kgK 𝑠𝑓𝑔@75kPa 6.2426

ℎ4 = ℎ𝑓@75kPa + 𝑥4 ℎ𝑓𝑔@75kPa = 384.44 + (0.886)(2278.0)

= 2402.75 kJ/kg
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

Thus,
𝑞𝑖𝑛 = ℎ3 − ℎ2 = 3116.1 − 387.47 = 2728.63 kJ/kg
𝑞𝑜𝑢𝑡 = ℎ4 − ℎ1 = 2402.75 − 384.44 = 2018.31 kJ/kg
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑞𝑖𝑛 − 𝑞𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 2728.63 − 2018.31 = 710.32 kJ/kg
and
𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝑞𝑜𝑢𝑡 2018.31
𝜂𝑡ℎ = =1− =1− = 𝟐𝟔%
𝑞𝑖𝑛 𝑞𝑖𝑛 2728.63
It is also interesting to note the thermal efficiency of a Carnot cycle operating between the same
temperature limits
𝑇𝑚𝑖𝑛 (91.76 + 273)K
𝜂𝑡ℎ,Carnot = 1 − =1− = 41.5%
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 (350 + 273)
The difference between the two efficiencies is due to the large external irreversibility in Rankine
cycle caused by the large temperature difference between steam and combustion gases in the
furnace.

2- Actual Rankine cycle

Assumptions: 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Kinetic and potential energy changes are
negligible.
(a) The thermal efficiency of a cycle is the ratio of the net work output to the heat input, and it is
determined as follows:
Table A-4:
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

ℎ𝑓@35 ℃ = 146.64 kJ/kg


} → Interpolate → ℎ𝑓@38 ℃
ℎ𝑓@40 ℃ = 167.53 kJ/kg
(167.53 − 146.64 kJ/kg)
ℎ1 = ℎ𝑓@38 ℃ = (146.64 kJ/kg) + × (38 − 35 ℃) = 159.2 kJ/kg
(40 − 35 ℃)

𝜐𝑓@35 ℃ = 0.001006 m3 /kg


} → Interpolate → 𝑣𝑓@38 ℃
𝜐𝑓@40 ℃ = 0.001008 m3 /kg
m3
m 3 (0.001008 − 0.001006 )
kg
𝑣1 = 𝑣𝑓@38 ℃ = (0.001006 )+ × (38 − 35 ℃)
kg (40 − 35 ℃)
⇒ 𝑣1 ≈ 0.001007 m3 /kg

Pump work input:


𝑤𝑠,pump,in 𝑣1 × (𝑃2 − 𝑃1 ) (0.001007 m3 /kg)(16000 − 9 kPa)
𝑤pump,in = = = = 18.98 kJ/kg
𝜂𝑝 𝜂𝑝 0.85

𝑃5 = 15 MPa ℎ = 3583.1 kJ/kg


} → Table − A6 → 5
𝑇5 = 600 ℃ 𝑠5 = 6.6796 kJ/kgK

𝑠1𝑠 = 𝑠𝑓@10 kPa = 0.6492 kJ/kgK, 𝑠𝑓𝑔@10 kPa = 7.4996 kJ/kgK

𝑠6𝑠 = 𝑠5 = 6.6796 kJ/kgK

𝑠6𝑠 − 𝑠1𝑠 (6.6796 − 0.6492 kJ/kgK)


𝑥6𝑠 = = = 0.804
𝑠𝑓𝑔@10 kPa (7.4996 kJ/kgK)

ℎ6𝑠 = ℎ𝑓@10 kPa + 𝑥6𝑠 ℎ𝑓𝑔@10 kPa = (191.81 kJ/kg) + (0.804)(2392.1 kJ/kg) = 2115.06 kJ/kg

Turbine work output:


𝑤turb,out = 𝜂 𝑇 𝑤𝑠,turb,out = 𝜂 𝑇 (ℎ5 − ℎ6𝑠 ) = 0.87(3583.1 − 2115.06 kJ/kg) = 1277.2 kJ/kg

Boiler heat input:


ℎ3 ≈ ℎ𝑓@35 ℃ = 146.64 kJ/kg (For compressed liquids, effect of pressure can be neglected.)

ℎ4 ≈ ℎ@15 MPa,625 ℃ = 3647.6 kJ/kg

𝑞𝑖𝑛 = ℎ4 − ℎ3 = 3647.6 − 146.64 = 3500.96 kJ/kg

𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑤turb,out − 𝑤pump,in = 1277.2 − 18.98 = 1258.22 kJ/kg

𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 1258.22 kJ/kg


𝜂𝑡ℎ = = ≅ 0.36 or 36%
𝑞𝑖𝑛 3500.96 kJ/kg

(b) The power produced by this power plant is

𝑊̇𝑛𝑒𝑡 = 𝑚̇(𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑡 ) = (15 kg/s)(1258.22 kJ/kg) = 18873 kW ≅ 18.9 MW


MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

3- Effect of boiler pressure and temperature on efficiency of Rankine cycle


MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

4- The ideal reheat Rankine cycle

Assumptions: 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Kinetic and potential energy changes are
negligible.
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

Discussion This problem was solved in Example 3c for the same pressure and temperature limits
but without the reheat process. A comparison of the two results reveals that reheating reduces the
moisture content from 19.6 to 10.4 percent while increasing the thermal efficiency from 43.0 to
45.0 percent.
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

5- The ideal regenerative Rankine cycle

Assumptions: 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Kinetic and potential energy changes are
negligible.
Analysis We note that the power plant operates on the ideal regenerative Rankine cycle.
Therefore, the pumps and the turbines are isentropic; there are no pressure drops in the boiler,
condenser, and feedwater heater; and steam leaves the condenser and the feedwater heater as
saturated liquid. First, we determine the enthalpies at various states:
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING
MEN436 ENERGY ENGINEERING

You might also like