Module 2 DT
Module 2 DT
Study Material
(Modules 1 to 4)
Paper 4
Direct Tax Laws &
International Taxation
[Direct Tax Laws as amended by the Finance Act, 2025]
Assessment Year 2026-27
Module – 2
(Relevant for May 2026, September 2026
and January 2027 examinations)
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without prior permission, in writing, from the publisher.
E-mail : bosnoida@[Link]
Website : [Link]
ISBN No. :
Printed by :
CONTENTS
MODULE – 1
Chapter 1 : Basic Concepts
Chapter 2 : Incomes which do not form part of Total Income
Chapter 3 : Profits and Gains of Business or Profession
Chapter 4 : Capital Gains
Chapter 5 : Income from Other Sources
Chapter 6 : Income of Other Persons included in assessee’s Total Income
Chapter 7 : Aggregation of income, set-off or carry forward of Losses
Chapter 8 : Deductions from Gross Total Income
MODULE – 2
Chapter 9 : Assessment of Various Entities
Chapter 10: Assessment of Trusts and Institutions, Political Parties and Other Special Entities
MODULE – 3
Chapter 13 : Deduction, Collection and Recovery of tax
Chapter 14 : Income-tax Authorities
MODULE – 4
Chapter 21 : Non-resident Taxation
Chapter 22 : Double Taxation Relief
Chapter 23 : Advance Rulings
10.6 Taxation regime for Securitization Trusts and its investors ........................................ 10.92
10.7 Scheme for taxation of Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) and
Infrastructure Investment Trust (Invit) [Chapter XII-FA – Section 115UA] ................... 10.94
10.8 Special taxation regime for Investment Funds and income received from
such funds [Chapter XII-FB] [Sections 115UB, 10(23FBA) & 10(23FBB)] ................. 10.107
Significant Select Cases ................................................................................................... 10.114
Test Your Knowledge ........................................................................................................ 10.119
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you would be able to -
❑ compute the total income of a company applying general provisions vis-à-vis special tax
regimes under section 115BAA or 115BAB and determine the optimum tax liability;
❑ advise the company whether or not to opt for the special tax regime under section 115BAA;
❑ examine whether alternate minimum tax (AMT) would be applied in the case of persons other
than companies; and compute AMT and determine AMT credit to be carried forward;
❑ compute the total income of a firm and its tax liability; and determine the liability of partners
of a firm and LLP on dissolution;
❑ compute total income and tax liability of a co-operative society applying general provisions
vis-à-vis special tax regimes under section 115BAD or 115BAE and determine the optimum
tax liability;
❑ advise the co-operative society whether or not to opt for the special tax regime under section
115BAD;
❑ compute the total income of an individual, HUF, AOPs/BoIs as per the default regime under
section 115BAC vis-à-vis normal provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and determine the
optimum tax liability;
❑ examine the incidence of taxation on mutual concerns.
9.2 DIRECT TAX LAWS
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Taxation of companies
- Total income and tax liability
as per normal provisions of Special provisions Alternate Minimum Tax
Act including MAT relating to shipping for persons other than
companies companies
- Total income and tax liability
as per concessional tax
regimes under section
115BAA or 115BAB, as the
case may be
Taxation of other entites
- Default Regime u/s
Taxation of Co-operative 115BAC
Taxation of firms/LLPs Societies (including
and their partners concessional tax regimes - Taxation of Individuals
u/s 115BAE or 115BAD) - Taxation of HUF
- Taxation of AOPs/BOIs
and their members
Tax planning
Taxation of Mutual Taxation of Local
considerations in relation
Concerns Authority
to business
(a) the company should have been formed and registered under Companies Act,
19561
(b) the registered office or the principal office of the company should be in India.
The expression ‘Indian Company’ also includes the following provided their registered
or principal office is in India:
(i) Company formed and registered under any law in force in any part of India,
excluding Jammu and Kashmir and specific Union territories;
(ii) Corporation established by or under a Central, State, or Provincial Act, such as
Financial Corporation or State Road Transport Corporation;
(iii) Institution, association, or body declared by the Board to be a company under
section 2(17)(iv);
(iv) Company formed and registered under any law in force in Jammu and Kashmir;
(v) Company formed and registered under any law in force in Union territories like
Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Pondicherry, or the State of Goa.
(2) Foreign Company: A company which is not a domestic company is a foreign company
[Section 2(23A)].
Classes of companies
Closely held and widely held Company: Domestic companies are again divided into broad
groups, viz
(1) companies in which public are substantially interested - ‘Widely-held companies’
(2) companies in which public are not substantially interested - ‘Closely held companies’
Widely Held Company (Company in which public are substantially interested): A
company is considered to have substantial public interest if it meets any of the following
criteria as outlined in section 2(18) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
(i) Government or RBI Ownership or participation: A company owned by the Central
or State Government or the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), or where at least 40% of
the shares are held (whether singly or taken together) by the Government or the RBI
or a corporation owned by the RBI.
(ii) Company registered under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 3 : A company
registered under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 2, which is formed to promote
commerce, art, science, education, research, social welfare, charity, environmental
protection, etc., and does not distribute dividends to their members.
(iii) Companies with No Share Capital and declared by the CBDT: A company which
does not have share capital and is declared by the CBDT to be a company in which
the public are substantially interested for specified assessment years.
(iv) Mutual Benefit Finance Company (Nidhi or Mutual Benefit Society): A company
that primarily accept deposits from its members and is declared by the Central
Government under Section 620A of the Companies Act, 1956, to be a Nidhi or Mutual
Benefit Society.
(v) Cooperative Society ownership: A company whose equity shares carrying at least
50% of the voting power are unconditionally allotted or acquired and were beneficially
held by one or more cooperative societies throughout the relevant previous year.
(vi) Public Limited Company: A company which is not a private company as defined in
the Companies Act, 1956 3 and which fulfills any of the following conditions:
- its equity shares were listed in a recognized stock exchange in India as on the
last day of the relevant previous year; or
- its equity shares carrying at least 50% (40% in case of an Indian company in
ship construction business or in the manufacture or processing of goods or in
mining or in generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power)
voting power have been unconditionally allotted to or acquired by and should
have been beneficially held throughout the relevant previous year by
(a) Government or
(b) a Statutory Corporation or
Foreign companies are taxed at 35%. However, in respect of specified royalties and
fees for technical services received from Government or an Indian concern in
pursuance of an agreement, approved by the Central Government, made by the
foreign company with the Government or Indian concern between 1.4.1961 and
31.3.1976 (in case of royalties) and between 1.3.1964 and 31.3.1976 (in case of FTS),
the rate of tax is 50%.
Surcharge
Surcharge@7% of the tax payable is leviable in the case of domestic companies and
@2% of tax payable in the case of foreign companies if the total income exceeds
` 1 crore but does not exceed ` 10 crore.
Surcharge@12% of the tax payable is leviable in the case of domestic companies and
@5% of tax payable in the case of foreign companies if the total income exceeds ` 10
crore.
Option available with domestic companies to opt for concessional rates of tax
Section 115BAA provides for concessional rate of tax @22% (plus surcharge@10%
and HEC@4%) for domestic companies, subject to certain conditions, like non-
availability of profit-linked deductions and investment-linked tax deduction under the
Act, non-availability of deduction for contribution to research and development,
additional depreciation etc. Domestic Companies have to exercise the option to be
governed by section 115BAA. Once the company exercises such an option under
section 115BAA in a year, it would continue to be governed by the special provision
u/s 115BAA thereafter and cannot opt for regular provisions in any subsequent year.
Section 115BAB provides for concessional rate of tax @15% (plus surcharge@10%
plus HEC@4%) to manufacturing or electricity generating domestic companies
set up and registered on or after 1.10.2019, and commences manufacturing or
generating electricity on or before 31.3.2024, subject to certain conditions, like non-
availability of profit-linked deductions and investment-linked tax deduction under the
Act, non-availability of deduction for contribution to research and development,
additional depreciation etc. The option for section 115BAB could be exercised by the
domestic companies in the very first year in which the eligible company is set up,
failing which it cannot exercise such an option in the future years. Accordingly,
companies who have already opted for concessional tax under section 115BAB
will be governed by the provisions of section 115BAB and a fresh option cannot
9.8 DIRECT TAX LAWS
be exercised under section 115BAB from A.Y. 2025-26 onwards. The company
who has exercised such an option under section 115BAB, it would continue to be
governed by the special provisions u/s 115BAB thereafter and cannot opt for regular
provisions in any subsequent year.
It may be noted that companies exercising options under section 115BAA or section
115BAB are not liable to minimum alternate tax under section 115JB.
These two sections, namely sections 115BAA and 115BAB have been detailed in the
upcoming paragraphs.
(2) The question as to whether a company is one in which public are substantially
interested or not is relevant for application of certain provisions which are applicable
only to closely held company.
There are certain special provisions which are applicable only to companies in which
public are not substantially interested. Examples of such special provisions are as
follows:
S. No. Section Provision
1 2(22)(e) Advance or loan by a closely held company - deemed
dividend
2 68 Taxation of sum received by closely held company as share
application money, share capital, share premium and the
explanation offered by company is not satisfactory
3 79 Carry forward and set-off of losses in case of closely held
companies
4 179 Liability of directors of private company
(3) 115BAB and 115BAA providing for concessional rate of tax in respect of certain
domestic companies
Sections 115BAB and 115BAA provide for concessional rates of tax and exemption from minimum
alternate tax (MAT) in respect of certain domestic companies. The provisions of these two new
sections are tabulated hereunder –
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.9
Note - For the purpose of point no.7(iv) in column (3) of the above table in relation to a company
exercising option under section 115BAB, any machinery or plant which was used outside India by
9.18 DIRECT TAX LAWS
any other person shall not be regarded as machinery or plant previously used for any purpose, if all
the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:—
(a) such machinery or plant was not, at any time previous to the date of the installation, used in India;
(b) such machinery or plant is imported into India from any country outside India;
(c) no deduction on account of depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has been
allowed or is allowable under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in computing the
total income of any person for any period prior to the date of installation of the machinery or
plant by the person.
Further, where in the case of a person, any machinery or plant or any part thereof previously used
for any purpose is put to use by the company and the total value of the machinery or plant or part
so transferred does not exceed 20% of the total value of the machinery or plant used by the company,
then, the condition specified that the company does not use any machinery or plant previously used
for any purpose would be deemed to have been complied with.
shall for the purposes of this section, prepare its statement of profit and loss for the
relevant previous year in accordance with the provisions of the Act governing such
company [Section 115JB(2)(b)].
(c) The section also specifies that the statement of profit and loss for the relevant previous
year has to be drawn in accordance with Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013.
Further, while preparing the annual accounts-
(i) the accounting policies,
(ii) the accounting standards followed for preparing such accounts, including
statement of profit and loss
(iii) the method and rates for calculating depreciation
shall be the same as have been adopted for the purpose of preparing such accounts
including statement of profit and loss and laid before the company at its annual general
meeting.
(d) Where the financial year adopted by the company under the Companies Act, 2013 is
different from the previous year under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the accounting
policies, accounting standards and methods and rates adopted for calculating
depreciation shall correspond to the accounting policies followed for preparing such
accounts including statement of profit and loss for the financial year.
(iii) Computation of book profit [Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2)]
For computing the book profit, the profit shall be increased by the following amounts, if the
amount referred in (a) to (i) is debited to the statement of profit and loss
(a) Income-tax: Income-tax paid or payable, and the provision therefor;
[It may be noted that income-tax includes –
(1) interest;
(2) surcharge;
(3) health and education cess (Explanation 2 to section 115JB)].
(b) Amount carried to Reserves: Amount carried to any reserves, by whatever name called;
(c) Provisions: Amounts set aside to provisions for meeting liabilities other than
ascertained liabilities;
9.20 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(d) Provisions for losses of subsidiary companies: Amount of provision for losses of
subsidiary companies;
(e) Dividends: Amount of dividends paid or proposed; or
(f) Expenditure relatable to exempt income: Amount of expenditure relatable to any
income to which section 10 or sections 11 or 12 apply;
(fa) Expenditure relatable to share of an assessee in the income of an AOP or BOI:
Amount of expenditure relatable to income, being share of the assessee in the income
of an AOPs or BOIs, on which no income-tax is payable in accordance with the
provisions of section 86;
(fb) Expenditure relatable to income accruing to foreign company: The amount or
amounts of expenditure relatable to income accruing or arising to an assessee, being
a foreign company, from –
(A) the capital gains arising on transactions in securities; or
(B) the interest, dividend, royalty, or fees for technical services chargeable to tax
at the rate or rates specified in Chapter XII i.e., section 115A
if the income-tax payable thereon in accordance with the provisions of the Act, other
than the provisions of this Chapter, is at a rate less than 15%;
(fc) Notional loss on the units of business trust: The amount representing-
- notional loss on transfer of a capital asset, being share of a special purpose
vehicle to a business trust in exchange of units allotted by that trust; or
- notional loss resulting from any change in carrying amount of said units or
- loss on transfer of such units
(fd) Amount of expenditure relatable to income referred under section 115BBF: The
amount or amounts of expenditure relatable to income by way of royalty in respect of
patent chargeable to tax under section 115BBF;
(g) Depreciation: The amount of depreciation;
(h) Deferred tax: The amount of deferred tax and provision therefore;
(i) Provision for diminution in the value of any asset: The amount set aside as
provision for diminution in the value of any asset.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.21
(j) Amount standing in the revaluation reserve: The profit shall also be increased by
the amount standing in revaluation reserve relating to the revalued asset on the
retirement or disposal of such asset, in case the same is not credited to the profit and
loss account.
(k) Amount of gain arise on transfer units of business trust: When units of business
trust are actually transferred, the amount of gain on such transfer has to be added to
compute the book profit, since notional gains on transfer of share of a special purpose
vehicle to a business trust in exchange for the units of the business trust and notional
gains resulting from change in carrying amount of such units would have been
deducted to compute book profit. The amount of gain on such transfer, if any, credited
to statement of profit and loss in the year of transfer will also be reduced.
In a case where the shares are carried at cost: The amount of gain has to be
computed by taking into consideration the cost of shares exchanged with the units of
the business trust.
In a case where the shares are carried at a value other than the cost through
statement of profit and loss: The carrying amount of shares at the time of exchange
would be taken into consideration for computing the amount of gain.
income-tax is payable in accordance with the provisions of section 86, if any such
amount is credited to the statement of profit and loss;
(iid) Income accruing to foreign company: The amount of income accruing or arising to
an assessee, being a foreign company, from, -
(A) the capital gains arising on transactions in securities; or
(B) the interest, dividend, royalty, or fees for technical services chargeable to tax
at the rate or rates specified in Chapter XII i.e., section 115A,
if such income is credited to the statement of profit and loss and the income-tax payable
thereon in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (including DTAAs),
other than the provisions of Chapter XII-B, is at a rate less than 15%.
For example, in case of foreign companies, dividend is taxable @20% as per section
115A. The adjustment in respect of dividend received by a foreign company on its
investment in India and expenditure relatable thereto is required to be made for the
purposes of calculation of book profit in case the tax payable on such dividend income
is less than 15% on account of concessional tax rate provided in the applicable Double
Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
(iie) Notional gain on the units of business trust: The amount representing –
(A) the notional gain on transfer of a capital asset, being a share of a SPV to a
business trust in exchange of units allotted by the business trust;
(B) notional gain resulting from any change in carrying amount of said units;
(C) gain on transfer of such units,
if any, credited to statement of profit and loss;
(iif) Loss on transfer of units: The amount of loss on transfer of units acquired in
exchange of shares of SPV computed by taking into account the cost of the shares
exchanged with the units, where the shares are carried at cost. In case shares are
carried at a value other than cost through statement of profit and loss, the amount of
loss on transfer of such units has to be computed by taking into account the carrying
amount of the shares at the time of exchange;
(iig) Income by way of royalty taxable under section 115BBF: The amount of income
by way of royalty in respect of patent chargeable to tax under section 115BBF;
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.23
As the book profit based on Ind AS compliant financial statements is likely to be different from
the book profit based on existing Indian GAAP, sub-sections (2A), (2B) and (2C) of section
115JB provides the framework for computation of book profit for Ind AS compliant companies
in the year of adoption and thereafter.
The other comprehensive income (OCI) includes certain items that will permanently
be recorded in reserves and hence, never be reclassified to the statement of profit
and loss included in the computation of book profits. These items shall be included
in book profit for MAT purposes at the point of time as specified below-
Sl. No Items Point of time
1 Changes in revaluation To be included in book profits at the
surplus of Property, Plant or time of realization/ disposal/ retirement
Equipment (PPE) and or otherwise transferred
Intangible assets (Ind AS 16
and Ind AS 38)
2 Gains and losses from To be included in book profits at the
investments in equity time of realization/ disposal/ retirement
instruments designated at fair or otherwise transferred
value through other
comprehensive income (Ind
AS 109)
3 Remeasurements of defined To be included in book profits every
benefit plans (Ind AS 19) year as the re-measurements gains and
losses arise
4 Any other item To be included in book profits every
year as the gains and losses arise
II. In case of demerger [Sub-section (2B)]: In the case of a resulting company, the
property and the liabilities of the undertaking or undertakings being received by it are
recorded at values different from values appearing in the books of account of the
demerged company immediately before the demerger, any change in such value shall
be ignored for the purpose of computation of book profit of the resulting company
under this section.
III. MAT on first time adoption [Section 115JB(2C)]:
In case of Ind AS compliant company, the book profit of the year of convergence and
each of the following four previous years, shall be further increased or decreased, as
the case may be, by one-fifth of the transition amount.
In the first year of adoption of Ind AS, the companies would prepare Ind AS financial
statement for reporting year with a comparative financial statement for immediately
preceding year. As per Ind AS 101, a company would make all Ind AS adjustments on
the opening date of the comparative financial year. The entity is also required to
present an equity reconciliation between previous Indian GAAP and Ind AS amounts,
both on the opening date of preceding year as well as on the closing date of the
preceding year.
For the purposes of computation of book profits of the year of adoption and for
adjustments, the amounts adjusted as on the opening date of the first year of adoption
shall be considered.
Example: Companies which adopt IndAS with effect from 1 st April 2025 are required
to prepare their financial statements for the year 2025-26 as per the requirements of
Ind AS. Such companies are also required to prepare an opening balance sheet as o f
1st April 2024 and restate the financial statements for the comparative period 2024-25.
In such a case, the first-time adoption adjustments as of 31 March 2025 shall be
considered for computation of MAT liability for previous year 2025-26 (Assessment
year 2026-27) and thereafter.
Further, in this case, the five years period shall be previous years 2025-26, 2026-27,
2027-28, 2028-29 and 2029-30.
However, the book profit of the previous year in which the asset or investment referred
to in sub clauses (B) to (E) of clause (iii) of the Explanation is retired, disposed,
realised or otherwise transferred shall be increased or decreased, as the case may
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.27
be, by the amount or the aggregate of the amounts referred to in the said sub-clause
relatable to such asset or investment [First proviso to section 115JB(2C)].
Further, the book profit of the previous year in which the foreign operation referred to
in sub clause (F) of clause (iii) of the Explanation is disposed or otherwise transferred,
shall be increased or decreased, as the case may be, by the amount or the aggregate
of the amounts referred to in the said sub-clause relatable to such foreign operations
[Second proviso to sub-section (2C)].
Meaning of certain terms [Explanation to Section 115JB(2C)]
Clause Term Meaning
(i) Year of convergence the previous year within which the convergence
date falls.
(ii) Convergence date the first day of the first Indian Accounting
Standards reporting period as defined in the Ind
AS 101.
(iii) Transition amount the amount or aggregate of the amounts adjusted
in other equity (excluding capital reserve and
securities premium reserve) on convergence date
but not including the following:
(A) Amount or aggregate of the amounts
adjusted in the other comprehensive income
on the convergence date which shall be
subsequently re-classified to the profit and
loss;
(B) Revaluation surplus for assets in
accordance with the Indian Accounting
Standards 16 and Indian Accounting
Standards 38 adjusted on the convergence
date;
(C) Gains or losses from investments in equity
instruments designated at fair value through
other comprehensive income in accordance
with the Indian Accounting Standards 109
adjusted on the convergence date;
(D) Adjustments relating to items of property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets
recorded at fair value as deemed cost in
accordance with paragraphs D5 and D7 of
the Indian Accounting Standards 101 on the
convergence date;
9.28 DIRECT TAX LAWS
comprehensive income
(Ind AS 109)
3 Remeasurements of To be included in book profits
defined benefit plans (Ind every year as the re-
AS 19) measurements gains and losses
arise
4 Any other item To be included in book profits
every year as the gains and
losses arise
(d) The other adjustments referred in (D), (E) and (F) (in the definition of
Transition Amount) above shall be made in the following manner:
(I) Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) and intangible
assets at fair value as deemed cost [referred in (D)(in the
definition of Transition Amount) above]
An entity may use fair value in its opening Ind AS Balance
Sheet as deemed cost for an item of PPE or an intangible
asset as mentioned in paragraphs D5 and D7 of Ind AS 101.
In such cases the treatment shall be as under—
• The existing provisions for computation of book profits
under section 115JB of the Act provide that in case of
revaluation of assets, any impact on account of such
revaluation shall be ignored for the purposes of
computation of book profits. Further, the adjustments in
retained earnings on first time adoption with respect to
items of PPE and Intangible assets shall be ignored for the
purposes of computation of book profits.
• Depreciation shall be computed ignoring the amount of
aforesaid retained earnings adjustment.
Similarly, gain/loss on realization/ disposal/ retirement of such
assets shall be computed ignoring the aforesaid retained
earnings adjustment.
II. Investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and
associates at fair value as deemed cost [referred in (E)(in
the definition of Transition Amount) above]
An entity may use fair value in its opening Ind AS Balance
Sheet as deemed cost for investment in a subsidiary, joint
venture or associate in its separate financial statements as
mentioned in paragraph D15 of Ind AS 101. In such cases
retained earnings adjustment shall be included in the book
profit at the time of realisation of such investment.
9.30 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(v) Clarifications on computation of book profit for the purposes of levy of Minimum
Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Ind AS
compliant companies [Circular No. 24/2017 4 dated 25.07.2017]
After amendment in section 115JB for computation of book profit for the purposes of levy of
Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) for Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) compliant
companies, CBDT received representations from various stakeholders seeking clarifications
on certain issues arising therefrom.
Accordingly, the CBDT has vide this circular, clarified these issues by way of the following FAQs:
Question 1: The profit for the period may include Marked to market (MTM) gains/ losses on
account of fair value adjustments on various financial instruments recognised through profit
or loss (FVTPL). A situation may arise where the losses on account of fair value adju stments
could be added back in view of clause (i) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2) of the Act.
4The year in the FAQs have been modified considering that the transition to Ind AS is taking place in the
P.Y. 2025-26.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.31
Whether the losses on such instruments require any adjustment for computing book p rofits
for the purposes of MAT?
Answer: Since MTM gains recognised through profit or loss on FVTPL classified financial
instruments are included in book profits for MAT computation, it is clarified that MTM losses
on such instruments recognised through profit or loss shall not require any adjust ments as
provided under clause (i) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2) of the Act. However, in case
of provision for diminution/ impairment in value of assets other than FVTPL financial
instruments, the existing adjustment of clause (i) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB (2) of the
Act shall apply.
It is further clarified that for financial instruments where gains and losses are recognised through
Other Comprehensive income (OCI), the amended provisions of MAT shall continue to apply.
Question 2: For the purposes of section 115JB of the Act, what shall be the starting point for
computing Book profits for Ind AS compliant companies? Whether Profit before other
comprehensive income [Item number XIII in Part 2 (Statement of Profit and Loss) of Divisio n
II of Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013] or Total Comprehensive Income (including other
comprehensive income) [Item number XV in Part 2 (Statement of Profit and Loss) of Division
II of Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013] shall be the starting point?
Answer: Starting point for computing Book profits for Ind AS compliant companies shall be
Profit before other comprehensive income [Item number XIII in Part 2 (Statement of Profit
and Loss) of Division II of Schedule III to the Companies Act 2013].
Question 3: As per Explanation to Section 115JB(2C) of the Act, the convergence date is defined
as the first day of the first Indian Accounting standards reporting period as defined in Ind AS 101.
The Memorandum explaining the provisions of the Finance Bill 2017 mentions that the adjustment
as on the last day of the comparative period is to be considered. It may be clarified as to what
would be the appropriate manner for computation of transition amount on convergence date, 1st
April i.e., at the start of the day or at the end of the day?
Answer: In the first year of adoption of Ind AS, the companies would prepare Ind AS financial
statement for reporting year with a comparative financial statement for immediately preceding
year. As per Ind AS 101, a company would make all Ind AS adjustments on the opening date
of the comparative financial year. The entity is also required to present an equity
reconciliation between previous Indian GAAP and Ind AS amounts, both on the opening date
of preceding year as well as on the closing date of the preceding year. The amounts as on
start of the opening date of the first year of adoption should be considered for the purposes
of computation of transition amount.
9.32 DIRECT TAX LAWS
For example, companies which adopt Ind AS with effect from 1st April 2025 are required to
prepare their financial statements for the year 2025-26 as per requirements of Ind AS. Such
companies are also required to prepare an opening balance sheet as of 1st April 20 24 and
restate the financial statements for the comparative period 2024-25. In such a case, the first
time adoption adjustments as of 31st March 2025 should be considered [i.e. the start of
business on 1st April 2025 (or, equivalently, close of business on 31st March 2025)] for
computation of MAT liability for previous year 2025-26 (Assessment year 2026-27) and
thereafter.
Question 4: As per Indian GAAP, proposed dividend was required to be recognized in the
financial statements for the year for which it pertained to even though these were declared in
the subsequent year. Section 115JB of the Act already provides for adjustments for dividend
for computation of book profit. As per Ind AS, the amount of proposed dividend is required to
be recognized in the year in which it has been declared rather than the year for which it pertains
to. Accordingly, on transition to Ind AS, the amount of proposed dividend for F.Y. 2024-25 which
was recognized in profit and loss account in F.Y. 2024-25 is required to be reversed and
credited to Retained Earnings. For the computation of MAT, whether these balances would form
part of the transition amount and thus be adjusted over a period of 5 years?
Answer: Adjustment of proposed dividend shall not form part of the transition amount.
Question 5: Under Ind AS, adjustments on the transition date may have a corresponding
impact on deferred taxes. Should the deferred taxes on such amounts be considered for the
purpose of transition amount?
Answer: Any deferred taxes adjustments recorded on the transition date shall be ignored for
the purpose of computing Transition Amount.
Question 6: As mentioned in Question No.1, clause (i) of Explanation 1 to Section 115JB(2)
of the Act provides for adjustments for computation of book profit for the amount or amounts
set aside as provision for diminution in the value of any asset. Convergence date adjustments
may include adjustment for Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts (Expected Credit Loss
adjustment) at the time of transition. Whether these adjustments would form part of the
transition amount referred to in section 115JB(2C) of the Act?
Answer: Adjustments relating to provision for diminution in the value of any assets other than
the ones mentioned in Question Number 1 above, shall not be considered for the purpose of
computation of the Transition Amount. Therefore, adjustments relating to provis ion for
doubtful debts shall not be considered for the purpose of computation of the transition
amount.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.33
Question 7: Under Section 115JB of the Act, transition amount has been defined as the
amount or the aggregate of the amounts adjusted in the ‘Other Equity’ (excluding capital
reserve and securities premium reserve) on the convergence date. Whether changes in share
application money on reclassification to ‘Other Equity’ would form part of the Transition
Amount?
Answer: Share application money pending allotment which is reclassified to Other Equity on
transition date shall not be considered for the purpose of computing Transition Amount.
Question 8: Under Ind AS, Investments in preference share is considered to be a liability
and the corresponding dividend expense is debited to Profit and loss account as interest cost.
Should such interest expenses on preference shares be deducted for the purpose of M AT
computation?
Answer: For the purpose of computation of MAT, profit/Transition Amount shall be increased
by dividend/interest on preference share (including dividend distribution taxes) whether
presented as dividend or interest.
Question 9: How do we account for items such as equity component, if any, of financial
instruments like Non-Convertible debentures (NCDs), Interest free loan etc. included in other
equity as per Ind AS for the computation of transition amount under MAT?
Answer: Items such as equity component of financial instruments like NCD’s, Interest free
loan etc. would be included in the Transition Amount.
Question 10: Where revaluation/fair value adjustments have been made to items of Property,
Plant & Equipment (PPE) under Ind AS, as per section 115JB of the Act, the book profit of
the previous year in which the items of PPE are retired, disposed or realised shall be
increased or decreased, as the case may be, by the revaluation amount relatable to such
items of PPE. Whether the revaluation amount to be considered for adjustment should be the
gross amount of the revaluation or the amount after adjustment of the deprecia tion on the
revaluation amount?
Answer: The book profit of the previous year in which the items of PPE are retired, disposed,
realised or otherwise transferred shall be increased or decrease d, as the case may be, by
the revaluation amount after adjustment of the depreciation on the revaluation amount
relatable to such asset. This has been explained by an illustration as under:
9.34 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Question 11: How should adjustments for service concession arrangements be treated for
the purpose of computation of book profit under MAT?
Answer: Adjustments on account of Service Concession arrangements would be included in
the Transition Amount and also on an ongoing basis.
Question 12: Existing clause (iii) of explanation to section 115JB(2) of the Act provides for
deduction of lower of the amount of loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation as per
books of account for computation of book profits. In case where, on adjustment of tr ansition
amount, the losses as per books of account gets wiped off, whether deduction for the said
amount would be available for assessment year 2026-27 onwards?
Answer: For assessment year 2026-27, the deduction of lower of depreciation or losses shall
be allowed based on the position as on 31 st March 2025. For the subsequent periods, the
position as per books of account drawn as per Ind AS shall be considered for computing lower
of loss brought forward or unabsorbed depreciation.
Question 13: How Capital Reserves or Securities Premium existing as per old Indian GAAP
reclassified to Retained Earnings/ Other Reserves on Convergence dat e be treated for MAT
purpose.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.35
Answer: The Capital Reserves or Securities Premium existing as on the convergence date
as per the erstwhile Indian GAAP which are reclassified to Retained Earnings/ Other
Reserves under Ind AS and vice versa, shall not be considered for the purposes of Transition
Amount.
It is further clarified, that even after such reclassifications, the amount of revaluation reserve
shall continue to be considered as revaluation reserve for the purposes of computation of
book profit and shall also include transfer to any other reserves by whatever name called or
capitalised.
Question 14: Companies which follow accounting year other than March 2026 ending for
Companies Act purposes and are required to transition to Ind AS will have to prepare financial
statements for MAT purposes for F.Y. 2025-26 partly under Indian GAAP and partly under
Ind AS. How should such companies compute MAT on transition to Ind AS?
Answer: In view of second proviso to section 115JB(2) of the Act, companies will be required
to follow Indian GAAP for the pre-convergence period and Ind AS for the balance period.
For example, a Company following December ending will be required to prepare, accounts
for MAT purposes under Indian GAAP for 9 months upto December 2025 and under Ind AS
for 3 months thereafter. The transition amount will be calculated with reference to
1st January 2026.
(vi) Adjustment in tax payable on book profit u/s 115JB(1) on account of Advance Pricing
Agreement (APA) under section 92CC or secondary adjustment under section 92CE
[Section 115JB(2D)]: Where there is an increase in book profit of the previous year due to
inclusion of past year(s) income in books of account on account of
(1) an APA entered into by the assessee under section 92CC; or
(2) secondary adjustment, required to be made under section 92CE, and
the assessee makes an application to the Assessing Officer in this behalf, the Assessing
Officer shall recompute
In such case, the provisions of section 154 [i.e., rectification of mistake apparent from record]
would apply; and the period of four years would be reckoned from the end of the financial
year in which the said application is received by the Assessing Officer.
Accordingly, Rule 10RB(1) has been inserted to provide that the tax payable by the assessee
company under section 115JB(1), for the previous year, shall be reduced by the following
amount:
(A-B) – (D-C)
A tax payable by the assessee company under section 115JB(1) on the book profit of
the previous year including the past income. However, where no tax is payable
under section 115JB(1) on book profit of that previous year including past income,
the value of A would be deemed to be zero.
B tax payable by the assessee company under section 115JB(1) on the book profit of
the previous year after reducing the book profit with the past income. However,
where no tax is payable under section 115JB(1) on the resultant figure, the value of
B would be deemed to be zero.
C Aggregate of tax payable by the assessee company under section 115JB(1) on the
book profit of those past year or years to which the past income belongs. However,
where no tax is payable under section 115JB(1) on the book profit of that year or
years, the tax payable for that year or years would be deemed to be zero.
D Aggregate of tax payable by the assessee company under section 115JB(1) on the
book profit of past year or years, referred to in item C, after increasing the book
profit with the relevant past income of such year or years. However, where no tax
is payable under section 115JB(1) on the amount so increased, the tax payable for
that year or years would be deemed to be zero.
It may be noted that if the value of (A-B)-(D-C) in the formula is negative, its value would
be deemed to be zero.
Meaning of Past income means the amount of income of past year or years
past income included in the book profit of the previous year on account of an APA
[Rule 10RB(2)] entered into by the assessee under section 92CC or on account of
secondary adjustment required to be made under section 92CE.
MAT credit to The tax credit allowed to the assessee under section 115JAA would
be reduced be reduced by the amount which is equal to the amount of reduction
[Rule 10RB(3)] that has been allowed under Rule 10RB(1).
The adjustment in the book profit shall be made only if the assessee has not utilised the credit
of tax paid in any subsequent assessment year under section 115JAA.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.37
The provisions of this sub-section have been inserted w.e.f. A.Y. 2021-22. However, these
provisions would also be applicable for the A.Y. 2020-21 or any earlier assessment year.
However, no interest shall be payable to such assessee on the refund arising on account of
re-computation of book profits of the previous year.
(vii) Compulsory filing of return of income and furnishing of report from Chartered
Accountant
The section also provides that every company to which this section applies shall furnish, a
report from a chartered accountant certifying that the book profit has been computed in
accordance with the provisions of this section, on or before the specified date referred to in
section 44AB (i.e., one month prior to the due date for filing return of income ) or in response
to a notice under section 142(1)(i), [Section 115JB(4)].
(viii) Allowability of carry forward of losses
In respect of the relevant previous year, the amounts determined under the provisions of
section 32(2) or section 72(1)(ii) or section 73 or section 74 or section 74A(3), shall be allowed
to be carried forward [Section 115JB(3)].
(ix) Applicability of other provisions of the Act
All other provisions of the Act shall apply to every assessee, being a company mentioned in
this section [Section 115JB(5)].
(x) Non-applicability of MAT [Section 115JB(5A)].
The provisions of MAT u/s 115JB shall not apply
- to any income accruing or arising to a company from life insurance business referred
to in section 115B.
- a company who has exercised the option under section 115BAA or section 115BAB.
(xi) Non-applicability of MAT in respect of certain foreign companies
Explanation 4 to section 115JB(2) with retrospective effect from 01.04.2001 provides for non-
applicability of levy of MAT under section 115JB in the following cases:
Existence of DTAA with the country of Additional condition to be
residence of the foreign company satisfied for non-applicability of
MAT
(i) The foreign company is a resident of a country It should not have a permanent
or a specified territory with which India has a establishment in India in accordance
DTAA under section 90(1) or the Central with the provisions of such
Government has adopted any agreement Agreement
between specified associations for double
taxation relief under section 90A(1)
9.38 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(ii) The foreign company is a resident of a country It is not required to seek registration
with which India does not have an agreement under any law for the time being in
of the nature referred to in clause (i) above force relating to companies.
Explanation 4A to section 115JB has been inserted with retrospective effect from 01.04.2001
to clarify that MAT provisions shall not be applicable to an assessee, being a foreign
company, where its total income comprises solely of profits and gains from business referred
to in section 44B or section 44BB or section 44BBA or section 44BBB and such income has
been offered to tax at the presumptive rates specified in these sections.
(xii) Concessional rate of MAT for unit located in IFSC
In case of a company, being a unit located in International Financial Services Centre and
deriving its income solely in convertible foreign exchange, the minimum alternate tax shall be
chargeable at the rate of 9% instead of 15%. [Section 115JB(7)]
ILLUSTRATION 1
A domestic company, ABC Ltd., furnishes the following particulars in respect of Assessment
Year 2026-27 and seeks your opinion on the application of section 115JB. You are also
required to compute the total income and tax payable.
(1) Profits as per Statement of profit and loss as per the Companies ` 215 lakhs
Act, 2013
(2) Statement of Profit and Loss includes:
(a) Credits: Dividend income from Indian companies ` 20 lakhs
Excess realized on sale of land held as investment ` 30 lakhs
(b) Debits: Depreciation on straight line method basis ` 100 lakhs
Provision for loss of subsidiary company ` 60 lakhs
(3) Depreciation allowable as per the Income-tax Rules, 1962 ` 150 lakhs
(4) Short term capital gains on sale of land mentioned above as ` 40 lakhs
computed under Income-tax Act, 1961
(5) Losses brought forward as per books of account and as per Income-tax Act, 1961:
Business loss ` 50 lakhs
Unabsorbed depreciation ` 60 lakhs
You will have to deal with this issue assuming that ABC Ltd. is not required to comply with
the Indian Accounting Standards. Ignore the provisions of section 115BAA.
Note - The turnover of ABC Ltd. for the P.Y. 2023-24 was ` 390 crore.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.39
SOLUTION
In the case of a company, it has been provided that where tax @15% of book profit exceeds
tax on total income computed as per normal provisions, the book profit shall be deemed to
be the total income for tax purposes.
It is therefore necessary to compute total income as per Income-tax Act, 1961 as well as book
profits.
I. Computation of Total Income as per the normal provisions of the Income-tax Act,
1961
Particulars ` (in Lakhs)
Net profit as per statement of profit and loss 215
Add: Depreciation debited to statement of profit and loss 100
Provision for losses of subsidiary company 60 160
375
Less: Dividend income from Indian companies 20
Excess realized on sale of land (considered separately) 30
Depreciation allowable as per Income-tax Rules, 1962 150 200
Business Income 175
Less: Set-off of brought forward business loss 50
125
Capital gains (Short term capital gains) 40
Income from other sources (Dividend income chargeable to 20
tax in the hands of shareholders)
185
Less: Set-off of unabsorbed depreciation 60
Total Income as per Income-tax Act, 1961 125
III. Computation of tax payable under the normal provisions of the Income-tax
Act, 1961
Total income as per the Income-tax Act, 1961 is ` 125 lakhs,
Particulars `
Tax payable ` 125 lakhs @25% since the turnover of the company 31,25,000
for the previous year 2023-24 ≤ ` 400 crore.
Add: Surcharge @ 7% 2,18,750
33,43,750
Add: Health and education cess @4% 1,33,750
Total Tax payable 34,77,500
Since 15% of book profit exceeds the tax payable as per normal provisions of the Income -tax
Act, 1961, the book profit of ` 225 lakhs would be deemed to be the total income and the tax
payable on such total income shall be 15% thereof i.e., ` 33,75,000 plus surcharge @7%
being ` 2,36,250 plus health and education cess @4% (of tax and surcharge) being
` 1,44,450. Total tax liability would be ` 37,55,700.
ILLUSTRATION 2
Maitri Jeans (P) Ltd. is in the business of manufacturing jeans. For the assessment year
2026-27, it paid tax @15% on its book profit computed under section 115JB. The Assessing
Officer though satisfied that it is liable to pay book profit tax under section 115JB, wants to
charge interest under sections 234B and 234C as no advance tax was pa id during the
financial year 2025-26. The company seeks your opinion on the proposed levy of interest.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.41
SOLUTION
The issue under consideration is whether interest under sections 234B and 234C can be
levied where a company is assessed on the basis of its book profit under section 115JB.
The Supreme Court, in Joint CIT v. Rolta India Ltd. (2011) 330 ITR 470, observed that there
is a specific provision in section 115JB(5) providing that all other provisions of the Income -
tax Act, 1961 shall apply to every assessee, being a company, mentioned in that section.
Section 115JB is a self-contained code pertaining to MAT, and by virtue of sub-section (5)
thereof, the liability for payment of advance tax would be attracted.
According to section 207, tax shall be payable in advance during any financial year, in
accordance with the provisions of sections 208 to 219 (both inclusive), in respect of the total
income of the assessee which would be chargeable to tax for the assessme nt year
immediately following that financial year.
Under section 115JB(1), where the tax payable on total income is less than 15% of “book profit”
of a company, the “book profit” would be deemed to be the total income and tax would be payable
at the rate of 15%.
Since in such cases, the book profit is deemed to be the total income, therefore, as per the
provisions of section 207, tax shall be payable in advance in respect of such book profit
(which is deemed to be the total income) also.
Therefore, if a company defaults in payment of advance tax in respect of tax payable under
section 115JB, it would be liable to pay interest under sections 234B and 234C.
Therefore, even though Maitri Jeans (P) Ltd. is assessed on the basis of its book profit under
section 115JB for A.Y.2026-27, it is liable to pay advance tax. Since Maitri Jeans (P) Ltd. has
not paid any advance tax during the financial year 2025-26, the levy of interest under section
234B and 234C is valid.
ILLUSTRATION 3
Sona Ltd., a resident company, earned a profit of ` 15 lakhs after debit/credit of the following
items to its Statement of Profit and Loss for the year ended on 31/03/2026.
(i) Items debited to Statement of Profit and Loss:
No. Particulars `
1. Provision for the loss of subsidiary 70,000
2. Provision for doubtful debts 75,000
9.42 DIRECT TAX LAWS
No. Particulars `
1. Profit from unit established in special economic zone 5,00,000
2. Share in income of an AOP as a member 1,00,000
3. Income from units of UTI 75,000
4. Long term capital gains on sale of building 3,00,000
Other Information:
(iii) Brought forward loss as per books of account of the company is of ` 10 lakhs which
includes unabsorbed depreciation of ` 4 lakhs.
(iv) The AOPs, of which the company is a member, has paid tax at maximum marginal rate.
Compute minimum alternate tax under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for A.Y.
2026-27, assuming that Sona Ltd. is not required to comply with the Indian Accounting
Standards. Ignore the provisions of section 115BAA.
SOLUTION
Computation of “Book Profit” for levy of MAT under section 115JB for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars ` `
Net Profit as per Statement of Profit and Loss 15,00,000
Add: Net profit to be increased by the following amounts as per
Explanation 1 to section 115JB
- Provision for the loss of subsidiary 70,000
- Provision for doubtful debts, being the amount set aside as 75,000
provision for diminution in the value of any asset
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.43
as per the Companies Act for computing book profit for levy of MAT. Since the following
items are not specified thereunder, the same cannot be adjusted for computing book
profit:
• Interest to financial institution (unpaid before filing of return) and
• Penalty for infraction of law
(2) Provision for gratuity based on actuarial valuation is an ascertained liability [CIT v.
Echjay Forgings (P) Ltd. (2001) 251 ITR 15 (Bom.)]. Hence, the same should not be
added back to compute book profit.
(3) As per proviso to section 115JB(6), the profits from unit established in special
economic zone cannot be excluded while computing the book profit, and hence, such
income would be liable for MAT.
(xiii) Set-off of credit of tax paid under section 115JB [Section 115JAA]
(1) This section provides that where tax is paid in any assessment year in relation to the
deemed income under section 115JB(1), the excess of tax so paid over and above the
tax payable under the other provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, will be allowed as
tax credit in the subsequent years. However, no interest would be payable on the tax
credit allowed.
(2) The tax credit is, therefore, the difference between the tax paid under section 115JB(1)
and the tax payable on the total income computed in accordance with the other
provisions of the Act.
(3) This tax credit is allowed to be carried forward for 15 assessment years succeeding
the assessment year in which the credit became allowable.
(4) Such credit is allowed to be set off against the tax payable on the total income in an
assessment year in which the tax is computed in accordance with the provisions of the
Act, other than 115JB, to the extent of excess of such tax payable over the tax payable
on book profits in that year.
Example:
P.Y. MAT as per Tax as per MAT Credit Actual MAT Credit
section regular Adjustment Tax Paid Balance
115JB provisions
2023-24 4,50,000 3,95,000 - 4,50,000 55,000
2024-25 4,70,000 4,10,000 - 4,70,000 1,15,000
[55,000 +
60,000]
2025-26 3,80,000 4,00,000 20,000 3,80,000 95,000
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.45
(5) Where as a result of order passed, the amount of tax payable is reduced or increased,
the amount of tax credit allowed shall also be reduced or increased accordingly.
(6) In case of conversion of a private company or unlisted public company into an LLP,
the tax credit under section 115JAA for MAT paid by the company under section 115JB
would not be allowed to the successor LLP.
(7) Where the amount of tax credit in respect of any income-tax paid in any country or
specified territory outside India, under section 90 or section 90A or section 91, allowed
against the tax payable under the provisions of section 115JB(1) exceeds the amount
of such tax credit admissible against the tax payable by the assessee on its income in
accordance with the other provisions of this Act, then, while computing the amount of
credit under this sub-section, such excess amount shall be ignored.
In other words, the amount of tax credit in respect of MAT shall not be allowed to be
carried forward to subsequent year to the extent such credit relates to the difference
between the amount of foreign tax credit (FTC) allowed against MAT and FTC
allowable against the tax computed under regular provisions of Act other than th e
provisions relating to MAT.
Example:
Particulars Tax as per MAT as per
regular section 115JB
provisions
Tax amount 1,50,000 1,75,000
FTC 1,60,000 1,60,000
Deduction in respect of FTC, being lower of tax 1,50,000 1,60,000
payable in India and FTC
Excess FTC allowed against MAT under section 115JB 10,000
MAT credit 25,000
MAT Credit as reduced by excess FTC allowable against MAT 15,000
liability (` 25,000 – ` 10,000)
(8) A company opting for section 115BAA cannot set-off MAT credit available to it under
section 115JAA from the year in which it exercises such option.
Chapter XII-G, containing sections 115V to 115VZC, provides for special provisions relating to
taxation of the income of shipping companies. With the introduction of tonnage tax scheme, the
companies have to exercise the option to be assessed under this scheme or under the normal
provisions of the Income-tax Act. The salient features of the scheme are as follows:
• A company owning at least one qualifying ship may join.
• A qualifying ship is one with a minimum tonnage of 15 tons and having a valid certificate.
• If a company is incorporated after the initial period i.e., 31.12.2004 or a company which is
incorporated before the initial period but becomes a qualifying company for the first time after
the initial period, this application is required to be made within three months of the date of
incorporation or the date on which it becomes a qualifying company, as the case may be.
(I) Computation of Tonnage Income from Business of Operating Qualifying Ships
Computation of profits and gains from the business of operating qualifying ships [Section 115VA]
(1) A company has the option to compute the income from the business of operating qualifying
ships in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
(2) Such income is deemed to be the income chargeable to tax under the head “Profits and gains
of business or profession” in respect of such business.
Operating ships [Section 115VB]
(1) A company shall be regarded as operating a ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, if it
operates any ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, whether owned or chartered by it.
(2) Even if only a part of the ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, has been chartered in
by it in an arrangement such as slot charter, space charter or joint charter, the company would
be regarded as operating a ship.
(3) However, a company will not be regarded as the operator of a ship or inland vessel, as the
case may be, which has been chartered out on bareboat charter-cum-demise terms or on
bareboat charter terms for a period exceeding three years.
(4) “Bareboat charter” means hiring of a ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, for a stipulated
period on terms which give the charterer possession and control of the ship or inland vessel, as
the case may be, including the right to appoint the master and crew.
(5) “Bareboat charter-cum-demise” means a bareboat charter where the ownership of the ship
or inland vessel, as the case may be, is intended to be transferred after a specified period
to the company to whom it has been chartered.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.47
(i) a seagoing ship or vessel or inland vessel, as the case may be, if the main purpose
for which it is used is for the provision of goods or services of a kind normally provided
on land (“seagoing ship” means a ship which is certified as seagoing by the competent
authority of any country);
9.48 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(3) “Tonnage tax scheme” means a scheme for computation of profits and gains of business of
operating qualifying ships under the provisions of this Chapter.
(4) The business of operating qualifying ships giving rise to “relevant shipping income” (i.e.
income referred to in section 115V-I(1)) has to be considered as a separate business, distinct
from all other activities or business carried on by the company.
(5) Such profits should be computed separately from the profits and gains from any other business.
(6) The tonnage tax scheme will apply only if an option to that effect is made (in accordance with
the provisions of section 115VP).
(7) The profits and gains from the business of operating qualifying ships of a company engaged
in such business and –
(a) not covered under the tonnage tax scheme or,
(b) which has not made an option to that effect,
(5) “Tonnage” means the tonnage of a ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, indicated in
the “valid certificate” (i.e., referred to in section 115VX) and includes deemed tonnage
computed in the prescribed manner.
(6) “Deemed tonnage” means the tonnage in respect of an arrangement of purchase of slots, slot
charter and an arrangement of sharing of break-bulk vessel.
(7) The tonnage is to be rounded off to the nearest multiple of hundred tons. For this if the last
figure that amount of tonnage is fifty or more, the tonnage shall be increased to the next
9.50 DIRECT TAX LAWS
higher tonnage which is a multiple of 100, otherwise, shall be reduced to the next lower
tonnage which is a multiple of 100.
(8) No deduction or set-off is allowed in computing the tonnage income under this Chapter.
ILLUSTRATION 4
Calculate tonnage income with respect to each of the following qualifying ships:
Qualifying Ships Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Net Tonnage 1,020 8,563 22,368 37,525
Days for which ship operated during the P.Y.2025-26 120 70 250 100
SOLUTION
Qualifying Ships Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Net Tonnage (rounded off) 1,000 8,600 22,400 37,500
Daily Tonnage (`) 700 4,728 10,678 15,395
Days for which ship operated during the 120 70 250 100
P.Y.2025-26
Tonnage Income (`) 84,000 3,30,960 26,69,500 15,39,500
(2) Where two or more companies are operators of a qualifying ship, the tonnage income of each
company shall be computed as if each had been the only operator, if the conditions specified
in (a) and (b) of (1) above are not satisfied.
(2) Where the aggregate of income from incidental activities exceeds ¼th % of the turnover from
core activities, such excess will not form part of relevant shipping income for the purposes of
this Chapter and shall be taxable under the other provisions of this Act.
(3) The core activities of a tonnage tax company are –
(i) its activities from operating qualifying ships; and
(ii) Other ship-related activities or inland vessel related activities, as the case may be,
being,
(a) shipping contracts in respect of –
(ii) operating one or more ships or inland vessel, as the case may
be, and sharing earnings or operating profits on the basis of
mutually agreed terms;
(7) If both Houses agree in making any modification therein, the notification will have effect in
such modified form.
(8) Similarly, if both Houses agree that the notification should not be issued, then such
notification will be of no effect.
(9) However, such modification or annulment will not affect anything previously done under that
notification.
(10) Where a tonnage tax company operates any ship or inland vessel, as the case may be,
which is not a qualifying ship, then the income attributable to operation of the non-qualifying
ship should be computed in accordance with the other provisions of this Act.
(11) In the following cases, the relevant shipping income is to be computed as if the transfer had
been at market value of the goods and services as on the date of transfer –
(i) Where any goods or services held for the purposes of tonnage tax business are
transferred to any other business carried on by a tonnage tax company, or
(ii) where any goods or services held for the purposes of any other business carried on
by such tonnage tax company are transferred to the tonnage tax business, and
(iii) In both the above cases, the consideration, if any, for such transfer as recorded in the
accounts of the tonnage tax business does not correspond to the market value of such
goods or services as on the date of the transfer,
(12) Market value in relation to any goods and services means the price that such goods or
services would ordinarily fetch on sale in the open market.
(13) Where the computation of the relevant shipping income in the manner specified above
presents exceptional difficulties, the Assessing Officer may compute such income on such
reasonable basis as he may deem fit.
(14) If the Assessing Officer is of the opinion that owing to the close connection between the
tonnage tax company and such other person or for any other reason, the affairs of the
business transacted between the tonnage tax company and any other person are arr anged
in such a manner that the company gets more than the ordinary profits which might be
expected to arise in the tonnage tax business, then he may take into account the amount of
income which may be reasonably deemed to have been derived therefrom for computing the
relevant shipping income.
(15) In case the relevant shipping income of a tonnage tax company is a loss, then, such loss is
to be ignored for the purposes of computing tonnage income.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.53
value of the block of qualifying assets as on the first day of the previous year as the book
written value of the asset beginning to be used for purpose other than tonnage tax business
bears to the book written down value of all the assets forming the block of qualifying assets,
has to be reduced from the written down value of that block and added to the block of other
assets.
(6) In case an asset forming part of the block of other assets begins to be used for tonnage tax
business, an appropriate portion of the written down value allocable to such asset i.e., the
amount which bears the same proportion to the written down value of the block of other assets
as on the first day of the previous year as the book written value of the asset beginning to be
used for tonnage tax business bears to the total book written down value of all the assets
forming the block of other assets, has to be reduced from the written down value of the block
of other assets and has to be added to the block of qualifying asset.
(7) Depreciation computed for the previous year on such asset mentioned in (6) shall be allocated
in the ratio of number of days for which the asset was used for the tonnage tax business and
for purposes other than tonnage tax business.
(8) Depreciation on the block of qualifying assets and block of other assets so created shall be
allowed as if the written down value as on the first previous year has been brought forward
from the preceding previous year.
(9) The expression “book written down value” means the written down value as appearing in the
books of account.
Deemed deduction and set-off and carry forward of losses etc. [Section 115VL]
(1) Any loss/allowance or deduction under sections 30 to 43B relating to or allowable for any of
the relevant previous years, would be deemed to have been given full effect to in that previous
year itself;
(2) No set-off or carry forward of losses referred to in –
(i) sections 70(1) and 70(3); or
(ii) sections 71(1) and 71(2); or
(iii) section 72(1) or
(iv) section 72A(1),
relating to the business of operating qualifying ships of the company is permissible where such
loss relates to any of the previous years when the company is under the tonnage tax scheme;
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.55
(3) No deduction under Chapter VI-A is allowable in relation to the profits and gains from the
business of operating qualifying ships;
(4) In computing the depreciation allowance under section 32, the written down value of any
asset used for the purposes of the tonnage tax business has to be computed as if the
company has claimed and has been actually allowed the deduction in respect of depreciation
for the relevant previous year.
Set-off and carry forward of losses of tonnage tax business [Section 115VM]
(1) Any losses attributable to its tonnage tax business that have accrued to a company before its
entry in tonnage tax scheme can be set off only against the relevant shipping income when
the company is under the tonnage tax scheme.
(2) Such losses will not be available for set off against any income other than relevant shipping
income in any previous year beginning on or after the date when the company exercises its
option under section 115VP.
(3) Any apportionment necessary to determine such losses should be made on a reasonable basis.
(3) In case of a company incorporated after the initial period or a company incorporated before
the initial period but which becomes a qualifying company for the first time after the initial
period, an application can be made within three months of the date of its incorporation or the
date on which it became a qualifying company, as the case may be.
(4) The Joint Commissioner, on receipt of an application for option for tonnage tax scheme, may
call for such information or documents from the company as he thinks necessary in order to
satisfy himself about the eligibility of the company.
(5) After satisfying himself about the eligibility of the company to make such option for tonnage
tax scheme, he can either pass an order in writing approving the option for tonnage tax
scheme or, if he is not so satisfied, pass an order in writing refusing to approve the option for
tonnage tax scheme.
(8) Every order granting or refusing the approval of the option for tonnage tax scheme should be
passed before the expiry of one month from the end of the month in which the application was
received. However, for an application received on or after 1.4.2025, order of granting or
refusing the approval of the option for tonnage tax scheme should be passed before the
expiry of three months from the end of the quarter in which the application was received.
(9) Where an order granting approval for tonnage tax scheme is passed, the provisions of this
Chapter will apply from the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the option
for tonnage tax scheme is exercised.
Period for which the tonnage tax option will remain in force [Section 115VQ]
(1) An option for tonnage tax scheme (after it has been approved under section 115VP(3)) would
remain in force for a period of ten years from the date on which such option has been exercised.
(2) For this purpose, the option would be taken into account from the assessment year relevant
to the previous year in which such option is exercised.
(3) An option for tonnage tax scheme would cease to have effect from the assessment year
relevant to the previous year in which –
(ii) a default is made in complying with the provisions contained in section 115VT or
section 115VU or section 115VV.
(4) The tonnage tax option will also cease to have effect in case –
(i) a company is excluded from the tonnage tax scheme under section 115VZC or
(ii) the qualifying company furnishes to the Assessing Officer, a declaration in writing to
the effect that the provisions of this Chapter may not be made applicable to it.
(5) In such a case, the profits of the company from the business of operating qualifying ships
shall be computed in accordance with the other provisions of the Act.
(2) The provisions of sections 115VP and 115VQ discussed above would apply in relation to a
renewal of the option for tonnage tax scheme in the same manner as they apply in relation to
the approval of option for tonnage tax scheme.
Bar from opting for tonnage tax scheme in certain cases [Section 115VS]
(1) A qualifying company is not eligible to opt for the tonnage tax scheme if –
(i) the company, on its own, opts out of the tonnage tax scheme or
(ii) it makes a default in complying with the provisions of section 115VT or section
115VU or section 115VV or
(iii) its option has been excluded from tonnage tax scheme in pursuance of an order
made under section 115VZC(1).
(2) In such cases, the qualifying company will not be eligible to opt for tonnage tax scheme for a
period of ten years from the date of such opting out or default or order, as the case may be.
(III) Conditions for Applicability of Tonnage Tax Scheme
Transfer of profits to Tonnage Tax Reserve Account [Section 115VT]
(1) A tonnage tax company is required to credit to a reserve account (called Tonnage Tax
Reserve Account) an amount not less than 20% of the book profits derived from its core and
incidental activities (referred to in section 115V-I(1)) in each previous year to be utilised in
the manner laid down below –
9.58 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(i) The amount credited should be utilized for acquiring a new ship or new inland
vessel, as the case may be, before the expiry of 8 years for the purposes of the
business of the company; and
(ii) Until the acquisition of a new ship or new inland vessel, as the case may be, the
amount can be utilized for the purposes of the business of operating qualifying ships
other than for distribution by way of dividends or profits or for remittance outside
India as profits or for the creation of any asset outside India. [Sub -section (3)]
(2) A tonnage tax company may transfer a sum in excess of twenty per cent of the book profits.
Such excess sum transferred should also be utilised in above manner.
(3) “Book profit” will have the same meaning as in the Explanation to section 115JB(2) so far as
it relates to income derived from the core and incidental activities.
(4) Where the company has book profit from the business of operating qualifying ships and book
loss from any other source, and consequently, the company is not in a position to create the
full or any part of the reserves as required, then –
(a) the company should create the reserves to the extent possible in that previous year.
(b) The shortfall, if any, will be added to the amount of the reserves required to be
created for the following previous year.
(c) Such shortfall will be deemed to be part of the reserve requirement of that following
previous year.
(5) Consequences of mis-utilisation / non-utilisation [Sub-section (4)]
(i) Where any amount credited to the Tonnage Tax Reserve Account has –
(a) been utilized for any purpose other than that referred to in (1) above; or
(b) not been utilized for the purpose of acquiring a new ship for the purpose of the
business of the company within 8 years; or
(c) has been utilized for acquiring a new ship or new inland vessel, as the case
may be, within 8 years but such ship or inland vessel is sold or transferred,
otherwise than in any scheme of demerger, within 3 years from the end of the
previous year in which it was acquired
then, an amount which bears the same proportion to the total relevant shipping
income of the year in which such reserve was created, as the amount out of such
reserve so utilized or not utilized bears to the total reserve created during that year
shall be taxable under the other provisions of the Act i.e.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.59
Taxable amount =
Extent of reserves unutilized or misutilised
Relevant shipping income
Total reserve created during the year
Provide answers to following questions, considering each of the questions given below
independently:
(a) Calculate the minimum reserve requirement of the company as per section 115VT.
(b) Calculate the taxable amount under the other provisions of the Act, if Dolphy Ltd. transferred
only ` 66 lakhs to tonnage tax reserve account during the P.Y. 2026-27.
(c) Calculate the taxable amount under the other provisions of the Act, if Dolphy Ltd. mis-utilised
amount of ` 12 lakhs during P.Y. 2026-27 out of ` 92 lakhs transferred to tonnage tax reserve
account during P.Y. 2025-26.
SOLUTION
(a) The minimum reserve requirement of the company as per section 115VT = 20% of the
book profits derived from core and incidental activities = ` 400 lakhs × 20% = ` 80 lakhs
(b) Taxable amount under the other provisions of the Act = Relevant shipping income × Shortfall
in the credit to the reserves/ Minimum reserve requirement = ` 350 lakhs × [(` 80 lakhs – 66
lakhs) / ` 80 lakhs)] = ` 350 lakhs × ` 14 lakhs / ` 80 lakhs = ` 61.25 lakhs
(c) Taxable amount under the other provisions of the Act for P.Y. 2026-27 = Relevant shipping
income during P.Y. 2025-26 × Extent of reserves misutilised/Total reserve created during
P.Y. 2025-26 = ` 350 lakhs × ` 12 lakhs / ` 92 lakhs = ` 45.65 lakhs
Minimum training requirement for a tonnage tax company [Section 115VU]
(1) A tonnage tax company, after its option has been approved under section 115VP(3) is
required to comply with the minimum training requirement in respect of trainee officers in
accordance with the guidelines framed by the Director-General of Shipping and notified in the
Official Gazette by the Central Government. [Sub-section (1)]
(2) A copy of the certificate issued by the Director-General of Shipping to the effect that such
company has complied with the minimum training requirement in accordance with the
guidelines referred to in sub-section (1) for the previous year is required to be furnished along
with the return of income.
(3) If the minimum training requirement is not complied with for any five consecutive previous
years, the option of the company for tonnage tax scheme shall cease to have effect from the
start of the previous year following the fifth consecutive year in which the failure to comply
with the minimum training requirement occurred.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.61
(1) In case of amalgamation, the provisions relating to the tonnage tax scheme would apply to
the amalgamated company if it is a qualifying company.
(2) However, where the amalgamated company is not a tonnage tax company, it should exercise
an option for tonnage tax scheme under section 115VP(1) within three months from the date
of the approval of the scheme of amalgamation.
(3) Where the amalgamating companies are tonnage tax companies, the provisions of this
Chapter would apply to the amalgamated company for such period as the option for tonnage
tax scheme which has the longest unexpired period continues to be in force.
Example: If two tonnage tax companies X Ltd. and Y Ltd. are amalgamated to form a new
company Z Ltd., and the option for tonnage tax scheme of X Ltd. has an unexpired period of
8 years and Y Ltd. has an unexpired period of 6 years, then the provisions of this Chap ter
would apply to the new company Z Ltd. for a period of 8 years.
(4) Where one of the amalgamating companies is a qualifying company on 1st October 2004 and
has not exercised option for tonnage tax scheme within the initial period, then –
(i) the provisions of this Chapter will not apply to the amalgamated company and
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.63
(ii) the income of the amalgamated company from the business of operating qualifying
ships has to be computed in accordance with the other provisions of the Act.
Demerger [Section 115VZ]
(1) Where in a scheme of demerger, the demerged company transfers its business to the
resulting company before the expiry of the option for tonnage tax scheme, then the scheme
would apply to the resulting company for the unexpired period if it is a qualify ing company.
(2) The option for tonnage tax scheme in respect of the demerged company will remain in force
for the unexpired period of the tonnage tax scheme if it continues to be a qualifying company.
(2) Where a qualifying company continues to operate a ship or inland vessel, as the case may
be, which temporarily ceases to be a qualifying ship, then such ship or inland vessel, as the
case may be, will not be considered as a qualifying ship for the purposes of this Chapter.
(i) (a) the determination of the allowance for any expense or interest, or
which has the effect of reducing the income or increasing the loss, as the case may
be, from activities other than tonnage tax activities chargeable to tax.
Such computation should be on the basis of entries made in the books of account in
respect of the previous year in which the transaction was entered into; or
(ii) a transaction or arrangement which produces to the tonnage tax company more than
ordinary profits which might be expected to arise from tonnage tax activities.
(1) Where a tonnage tax company is a party to any transaction or arrangement which amounts
to an abuse of the tonnage tax scheme, the Assessing Officer has the power to exclude such
company from the tonnage tax scheme, by an order in writing, after giving an opportunity of
being heard to such company.
(2) However, no order to this effect can be passed without the previous approval of the Principal
Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner.
(3) This section does not apply where the company shows to the satisfaction of the Assessing
Officer that the transaction or arrangement was a bona fide commercial transaction and has
not been entered into for the purpose of obtaining tax advantage under t his Chapter.
Where an order has been passed by the assessing officer excluding the tonnage tax company from
the tonnage tax scheme, then the option for tonnage tax scheme shall cease to be in force from the
first day of the previous year in which the transaction or arrangement was entered into.
is bound under a statutory obligation to give notice of his appointment as liquidator or receiver,
as the case may be. This notice may be given within thirty days of his appointment to the
Assessing Officer having jurisdiction to assess the income of the company.
(ii) Information of tax due by the Assessing Officer: The Assessing Officer, in his turn is bound
after making such enquiries or calling for such information as he may deem fit, to notify to the
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.65
liquidator, within three months from the date of receipt of the notice of appointment, of the
amount which in his opinion would be sufficient to provide for any tax which is then or likely
thereafter to become payable by the company.
(iii) Restriction on liquidator to part with assets: The liquidator is debarred from parting with
the assets of company and its properties in his hands until he is notified by the Assessing
Officer of the amount which will be sufficient to provide for any tax which is then, or is likely
thereafter, to become payable by the company except with the prior approval of
- the Principal Chief Commissioner or
- Chief Commissioner or
- Principal Commissioner or
- Commissioner
and on being so notified, shall set aside an amount equal to the amount notified.
However, the above restriction of debarring the liquidator from parting with assets or
properties shall not be applicable on
- payment of the tax payable by the company,
- payment to secured creditors whose debts are entitled under law to priority of
payments over the debts due to the Government on the date of liquidation and
- meeting such costs and expenses of the winding up of the company
as are, in the opinion of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal
Commissioner or the Commissioner, reasonable.
(iv) Consequences of failure to give notice or set aside the tax due by the liquidator: If the
liquidator fails to notify the Assessing Officer of his appointment within the time specified or
fails to set aside the amount intimated by the Assessing Officer as being sufficient to provide
for the tax liability of the company or parts with any of the assets or property of the company
in his hands in contravention of the above provisions, he shall be personally liable for payment
of the tax which the company would be liable to pay.
However, if the amount of any tax payable by the company is notified by the Assessing
Officer, the personal liability of the liquidator under this sub-section shall be to the extent of
such amount.
Failure to comply with the above requirement would be an offence punishable under section
276A.
9.66 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Where there are more liquidators than one, their obligations and liabilities under this section
are joint and several.
(v) Overrides other laws except IBC, 2016: The provisions of this section have the effect of
over-riding anything to the contrary contained under the Companies Act or any other law for
the time being in force and apply to all companies, public or private except the provisions of
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
(i) Liability of directors: Where any tax due from a private company in respect of any income
of any previous year or from any other company in respect of any income of any previous
year during which such other company was a private company cannot be recovered, then,
every person who was director of a private company at any time during the relevant previous
year shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of the tax unless he proves that the
non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his
part in relation to the affairs of the company.
The personal liability imposed by this section on the directors of a private company shall have
the effect of over-riding any provision under the Companies Act, 2013 by which the liability of
the directors is reduced or curtailed. Thus, personal liability can be imposed by the Assessing
Officer on a direction even without any adjudication by a Court.
(ii) Meaning of Tax Due: For the purposes of this section, “tax due” includes penalty, interest,
fees or any other sum payable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(i) Applicability: Any person other than a company, who has claimed deduction under any
section (other than section 80P) included in Chapter VI-A under the heading “C – Deductions
in respect of certain incomes” or under section 10AA or under section 35AD would be subject
to AMT [Section 115JEE(1)].
The provisions of AMT would, however, not be applicable to an individual, HUF, AOPs, BOIs,
whether incorporated or not, or artificial juridical person, if the adjusted total income of such
person does not exceed ` 20 lakh [Section 115JEE(2)].
(ii) Levy of AMT@18.5% on Adjusted Total Income: Accordingly, where the regular income-
tax payable by a person, other than a company, for a previous year computed as per the
provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (other than Chapter XII-BA) is less than the AMT
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.67
payable for such previous year, the adjusted total income shall be deemed to be the total
income of the person. Such person shall be liable to pay income-tax on the adjusted total
income @ 18.5% [Section 115JC(1)].
(iii) Meaning of Adjusted Total Income: “Adjusted total income” would mean the total income
before giving effect to Chapter XII-BA i.e., AMT provisions as increased by the deductions
claimed, if any, under –
(1) any section (other than section 80P) included in Chapter VI-A under the heading “C –
Deductions in respect of certain incomes” (Section 80-IA to 80RRB);
(vi) Applicability of Interest and Penal provisions: Section 115JE specifically provides that
“save as otherwise provided in this Chapter, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to a
person referred to in this Chapter”. Hence, all other provisions relating to self -assessment
under section 140A, advance tax, interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C, penalty etc.
would also apply to a person who is subject to AMT.
9.68 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(vii) Non-applicability of AMT provisions: The provisions of this section shall not apply to a
person
- a resident co-operative society who has opted for section 115BAD or 115BAE or
- where income tax payable in respect of total income of such person is computed as
per section 115BAC(1A) [Section 115JC(5)].
AMT provisions are also not applicable to Specified fund referred to in section 10(4D).
(Section 115BAC, 115BAD and 115BAE are discussed later on in this chapter)
Tax credit for AMT [Section 115JD]
(i) AMT paid in excess of the regular income-tax payable under the provisions of the Income-tax
Act, 1961 for the year would be eligible for credit to be carried forward and set -off against
income-tax payable in the later year to the extent of excess of regular income-tax payable
under the provisions of the Act over the AMT payable in that year. The balance tax credit, if
any, shall be carried forward to the next year for set-off in that year in a similar manner.
Where the amount of tax credit in respect of any income-tax paid in any country or specified
territory outside India under section 90 or section 90A or section 91, allowed against the
alternate minimum tax payable, exceeds the amount of the tax credit admissible against the
regular income-tax payable by the assessee, then, while computing the amount of credit
under this sub-section, such excess amount shall be ignored.
In other words, the amount of tax credit in respect of AMT shall not be allowed to be carried
forward to subsequent year to the extent such credit relates to the difference between the
amount of foreign tax credit (FTC) allowed against AMT and FTC allowable against the
regular tax payable by the assessee.
(ii) AMT credit can be carried forward for set-off upto a maximum period of 15 assessment years
succeeding the assessment year in which the credit becomes allowable.
(iii) No interest shall, however, be payable on such tax credit.
(iv) If the amount of regular income-tax or AMT is reduced or increased as a result of any order
passed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the amount of tax credit allowed under section 115JD
would also vary accordingly.
(v) The provisions of AMT credit shall not apply to a person
- a resident co-operative society who has opted for section 115BAD or 115BAE or
- where income tax payable in respect of total income of such person is computed as
per section 115BAC(1A) [Section 115JD(7)].
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.69
Tax Credit allowable even if Adjusted Total Income does not exceed ` 20 lakh in the year of
set-off [Section 115JEE(3)]
The credit for tax paid under section 115JC shall be allowed in accordance with the provisions of
section 115JD, notwithstanding the conditions mentioned in sub-section (1) or (2) of section 115JEE.
Hence, even if the assessee has not claimed any deduction under section 10AA or section 35AD or
Chapter VI-A under the heading “C- Deductions in respect of certain incomes” in any previous year
and the adjusted total income of that year does not exceed ` 20 lakh, it would still be entitled to set-
off his brought forward AMT credit in that year.
Related Provisions
(i) Correspondingly, under section 140A, for determination of self-assessment tax payable, tax
credit claimed to be set-off in accordance with section 115JD has also to be reduced.
(ii) Such tax credit allowed to be set-off in accordance with the provisions of section 115JD has
to be reduced from the amount of tax on total income determined under section 143(1) or on
regular assessment, on which interest under section 234A is leviable for default in furnishing
return of income.
(iii) Similarly, section 234B levies interest for default in payment of advance tax, to enable
reduction of tax credit under section 115JD while computing “assessed tax”.
(iv) Likewise, in section 234C levying interest for deferment of advance tax, such tax credit under
section 115JD has to be reduced for computing “tax due on the returned income”.
ILLUSTRATION 6
Mr. Rajesh has income of ` 45 lakhs under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. One
of his businesses is eligible for deduction @100% of profits under section 80-IB for A.Y. 2026-27. The
profit from such business included in the business income is ` 20 lakhs. Compute the tax payable by Mr.
Rajesh, assuming that he has no other income during the P.Y. 2025-26 and he has exercised the option
to shift out of default regime under section 115BAC.
SOLUTION
Computation of regular income-tax payable under the provisions of the Act
Particulars `
Profits and gains of business or profession 45,00,000
Gross total Income 45,00,000
Less: Deduction under section 80-IB 20,00,000
Total Income 25,00,000
9.70 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Tax payable
Up to ` 2,50,000 Nil
5% on next ` 2,50,000 12,500
20% on next ` 5,00,000 1,00,000
30% on balance ` 15,00,000 4,50,000
5,62,500
Add: Health and education cess@ 4% 22,500
Tax liability 5,85,000
Particulars `
Total Income as per the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 25,00,000
Add: Deduction under section 80-IB 20,00,000
Adjusted Total Income 45,00,000
AMT @ 18.5% of ` 45,00,000 8,32,500
Add: Health and Education Cess @ 4% 33,300
AMT liability 8,65,800
Since the regular income-tax payable as per the provisions of the Act is less than the AMT, the
adjusted total income of ` 45 lakhs would be deemed to be the total income of Mr. Rajesh and he
would be liable to pay tax @18.5% thereof. The tax payable by Mr. Rajesh for the A.Y. 2026-27
would, therefore, be ` 8,65,800.
Mr. Rajesh would be eligible for credit to the extent of ` 2,80,800 [` 8,65,800 – ` 5,85,000] to be
set-off in the year in which tax on total income computed under the regular provisions of the Act
exceeds the AMT. Such credit can be carried forward for succeeding 15 assessment years.
a minor, has been admitted to the benefits of an existing partnership. In addition, the
definitions also include the terms limited liability partnership, a partner of limited liability
partnership as they have been defined in the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008.
A partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of
business carried on by all or any of them acting for all. The persons who have entered into
partnership with one another are called individually ‘partners’ and collectively a ‘firm’.
Firm
A firm though not a legal person or juridical entity, is chargeable to tax as a separate entity
distant from the partners and the partners are assessable as individuals and not as an
association persons or body of individuals. The term ‘firm’ as used in the Act covers both
registered and unregistered firms.
(ii) Residential Status of Firm/LLP
The residential status of a firm to be determined depending upon the fact whether or not the
control and management of its affairs is exercised from within India. Even if the negligible
part of the control and management is exercised from within India, the firm would be resident
in India for all the purposes. For determining the residential status of a firm, it is immaterial
to ascertain the residential status of partners thereof because a firm may be resident even in
cases where all the partners are not resident in India and they control or manage the affairs
from India.
(iii) Tax Rate of Firm/LLP
Every firm is liable to pay tax flat rate of 30% on its total income of the previous year computed
in accordance with the provisions of the Act, plus surcharge @12% if its total income exceeds
` 1 crore plus health and education cess @4%.
(b) The share of the partner in the income of the firm will not be included in the hands
of the partner. It will be exempt under section 10(2A).
(c) Any salary, bonus commission or remuneration, by whatever name called, which
is due to or received by a partner will be allowed as a deduction subject to certain
restrictions.
(d) Where a firm pays interest to any partner, the firm can claim deduction of such
interest from its total income subject to certain conditions. However, the maximum
rate at which interest can be allowed to a partner will be 12% per annum.
(e) The income of the firm will be taxed at a flat rate of 30% plus surcharge @12% if
its total income exceeds `1 crore plus health and education cess @4%.
To get the status of PFAS, the firm should be evidenced by an “instrument”. The word
“instrument” means a document of legal nature by which any right or liability is created,
limited, extended, or extinguished.
Instrument does not necessarily mean a regular partnership deed, but it may constitute
any other relevant document. If the terms of a partnership are contained in a number
of documents or in the correspondence between the parties, the documents or letters
would constitute “instrument” for the purposes of section 184(1)(i).
The next condition is that the individual shares of partners must be specified in the
instrument. A firm cannot get the status of PFAS unless the instrument of partnership
specifies the individual shares of partners in the profits of the partnership. Evidence
regarding the shares of partners should be available within the framework of the
instrument. It should not involve searching of a number of documents.
The next condition is that a certified copy of the instrument should accompany the first
return of income of a firm. As already noted, “instrument” in this sense refers not only
to the partnership deed but also other documents from which the existence of
partnership can be proved. Accordingly, certified copies of all documents will have to
be submitted. Section 184 requires that the copy of the instrument shall be certified in
writing by all partners other than minors. If, however, the return is made after the
dissolution of the firm, it should be certified by all partners other than minors who were
partners in the firm immediately before dissolution and by the legal representative of
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.73
any such partner who is deceased. The certified copy of the instrument of partnership
shall accompany the return of income of the firm of the previous year relevant to the
assessment year.
If there is any change in the constitution of the firm or profit-sharing ratio during any
previous year, a certified copy of the revised instrument of partnership should be filed
along with the return of income of the relevant assessment year. Even if there is a
change in remuneration/payment of interest to partners but there is no change in profit
sharing ratio, a copy of the revised instrument of partnership should be submitted
along with return to comply with the provisions of section 40(b).
Section 184(5) provides that where the firm commits any default as mentioned in
section 144 (Best Judgment assessment - Refer Chapter 15: Assessment Procedure
for detailed discussion), the firm shall be so assessed that no deduction for payment
of interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration, by whatever name called,
made by the firm to any partner shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable
under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. However, the interest,
salary, bonus, commission or remuneration so disallowed shall not be charged to tax
in the hands of the partners under section 28(v).
a certified copy
of the revised
a certified copy
instrument of
individual of the
the firm is partnership
shares of instrument
evidenced by filed along with
partners are accompany the
an the return of
specified in the first return of
“instrument”. income of the
instrument income of a
relevant
firm
assessment
year
Explanation 4 to section 40(b) defines working partner as one who is actively engaged
in conducting the affairs of the business or profession of the firm of which he is a
partner. This definition is very general. It seems that a partner can be a working partner
in more than one firm. If a partner is employed somewhere else too, he can still be a
working partner in the firm. However, in all such situations the partner must in fact be
a working partner in the firm. In other words, merely because a person is working
somewhere else too, such a fact does not by itself debar him from being a working
partner in a firm in which he is a partner. As stated before, to be a working partner,
the partner has to be actively engaged in conducting the affairs of the business or
profession of the firm. Now in order to be actively engaged in conducting the affairs of
the business or profession does not require either expressly or by implication that the
concerned partner should be so actively engaged in conducting the business affairs
on a full-time basis. A partner can be said to be actively engaged in conducting the
affairs of the firm even if he devotes a part and not the whole of his working hours.
Further, in order to be actively engaged in the affairs, a partner is not expected to be
engaged in the whole of the affairs of the business of the firm, nor is he expected to
know everything about the affairs of the business of the firm. For example, in a firm
with many partners, one partner may be looking after purchases, another after sales
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.75
and another after production and still another after administration, finance and
accounts. It cannot be contended that just because they are not overall in charge, they
cannot be considered as working partner.
Another significant point to be noted here is that the definition of “working partner” in
Explanation 4 contemplates an individual. Therefore, a partner other than an individual
(example a company) cannot be working partner. An interesting situation may be
considered here. When a company is a partner in a firm, a director or shareholder of
the company can very well be an employee of the firm in which the company is a
partner. Any salary/remuneration paid by the firm to such an employee would be totally
outside the ambit of disallowance under section 40(b). This would be so because the
individual who is an employee of the firm is not a partner in the firm. It is the company
in which he is the director, which is the partner and, section 40(b) contemplates
allowance of remuneration paid by a firm to its partners and not to other employees.
(2) It should be authorised by the Partnership Deed:
SOLUTION
Remuneration will be payable effectively from the date of the deed which provides for
the payment of such remuneration. In the given case, the original deed provides for
remuneration at the rate of ` 2,000 for each partner from April 1, 2025 onwards. The
supplementary deed is executed on August 1, 2025 increasing the limit of
remuneration. Such an increase in the limit of remuneration will be allowable only from
1st August 2025, being the date of supplementary deed. Hence, for the period from
1st April 2025 to 31st July 2025, the partners will be allowed remuneration only at the
rate of ` 2,000 per month.
(4) It should not exceed the permissible limit:
As we have seen earlier, salary, bonus, commission or other remuneration may be
paid to any working partner in accordance with and as authorised by the terms of
the partnership deed and in relation to any period falling after the partnership deed.
However, the maximum amount of such payment to all the partners during the
previous year should not exceed the limits given below:-
Book Profit Quantum of Deduction
On the first ` 6 lakh of book profit or in ` 3,00,000 or 90% of book profit,
case of loss whichever is higher
on the balance of book profit 60% of book profit
Book Profit:
The permissible remuneration is to be computed as a percentage of book profit. For
this purpose, we have to draw up the profit and loss account and find the net profit.
This profit and loss account is to be prepared in the manner laid down in Chapter
IV-D. It may be noted that Chapter IV-D contains the provisions relating to
computation of income under the head ‘Profits and gains of business or profession’.
Further, Explanation 3 also lays down that if while arriving at the above net profit,
the remuneration paid/payable by a firm to its partners is debited to such a profit and
loss account, the aggregate of such remuneration paid/payable to the partners
shall be added to the net profit in order to arrive at the book profit.
When the Act says that the profit and loss account should be prepared in the manner
laid down in Chapter IV-D, it means that only those items which are chargeable under
section 28 as income will be taken into account and only deductions permissible
thereunder will be allowed.
9.78 DIRECT TAX LAWS
For example, rent from house property, dividend, interest on bank deposit or
government securities are not chargeable as income from business or profession
under section 28. Therefore, if the profit and loss account of a firm contains these
receipts, they have to be excluded while calculating the net profit.
In the same way, items which are to be disallowed under the various provisions from
sections 28 to 44D will have to be eliminated. It naturally follows, therefore, that
brought forward business losses will not be deducted while calculating book profit.
In simple terms, ‘book profit’ means income computed under the head “Profits and
gains of business or profession” before deduction of partners remuneration.
Accordingly, unabsorbed depreciation can be set-off under section 32(2) against
such income to arrive at the book profit, but not unabsorbed business loss under
section 72.
The above table shows the upper limits up to which deduction is allowed to firm in
respect of the remuneration paid to its working partners. It does not mean that a firm
is prohibited from paying remuneration beyond these limits. A firm can pay
remuneration to working partners beyond these limits, but it will suffer disallowance in
respect of such excess under section 40(b) and consequently pay tax on it @30%. If
a firm pays remuneration to non-working partners, the same will be the result.
However, the above limits apply to the remuneration paid to the group of all working
partners in a firm taken together and not to each individual partner. Finally, it may be
noted that section 40(b) does not compel a firm to pay remuneration to its working
partners. It is purely at the discretion of the firm. However, once a firm pays
remuneration to its working partners it will be subject to the restrictive provisions of
section 40(b). It is also open to a firm to pay salary only to a few working partners a nd
not all the working partners.
Interest payable to partners: So far as allowability of interest paid by a firm to its
partners under section 40(b) is concerned, the following conditions have been
prescribed by section 40(b):
(1) The interest payable by a firm to its partners should be authorised by and in
accordance with the partnership deed.
(2) The interest payable by a firm to its partners should not be for a period falling
prior to the date of such partnership deed authorizing the payment of such
interest.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.79
(3) The rate of interest payable to the partners shall not exceed 12% simple
interest per annum.
An important question could be regarding the amount with reference to which this
interest @12% will have to be calculated. For example, a partner may have contributed
capital to the firm and in addition may also advance loan to the firm. The question
would be whether the interest paid by the firm on capital would be allowable or that on
the loan would be allowable. Moreover, some firms have an accounting system of
maintaining current accounts of partners in addition to the capital accounts. When
some balance is standing to the credit of a partner in such current account as well the
question arises whether the interest paid on the balance in the current account will be
allowable within the meaning of section 40(b).
In this regard, it may be noted that section 40(b) does not refer to nor does it make
any distinction between the capital contributed by a partner to the firm, the loan
advanced by a partner to the firm or the balance in the current account of a partner.
Therefore, the interest paid by a firm to its partners on the credit balance standing
in all the accounts/whether in capital account, loan account or current account,
shall be allowed as deduction to the firm under section 40(b). The idea seems to
be to allow interest on the funds employed in the firm by a partner.
As it happens, many a time, a partner may have debit balance in his current account
and credit balance in his capital account or loan account. The question which would
arise in such a situation could be whether the interest payable to such a partner at the
rate of interest authorised by and in accordance with partnership deed will be reckoned
with reference to the aggregate of the credit balance in the capital account and the
loan account including the debit balance in the current account or whether it should be
calculated on the net balance that is the aggregate of the credit balance in the capital
account and in the loan account as reduced by the debit balance in the current
account. It appears that in such a situation the equitable principle would be to allow
interest reckoned with reference to the net balance. Alternatively, if interest is
recovered from a partner on the debit balance in his account and interest is paid to the
same partner on the credit balance in his account, the net amount paid to that partner
would be subjected to the provisions of section 40(b). However, interest received from
one partner cannot be set-off against interest paid to another partner.
The next issue which is to be considered here is the point of time at which interest
should be credited to the partners’ accounts. For example, a firm may adopt a policy
of crediting interest quarterly to the credit of the partners’ accounts. In such a ca se,
9.80 DIRECT TAX LAWS
the firm would be paying in effect interest on interest at the year end. This would
amount to compounding interest quarterly. This is not permitted under section 40(b)
because what that section contemplates is simple interest and simple interest here
would mean interest which is calculated yearly or annually. Paying the interest on
interest credited periodically during a year would be contrary to the concept of simple
interest per annum.
Partner in a representative capacity: If an individual is a partner in a firm in a
representative capacity (that is on behalf and for the benefit of another person) and
not in his personal capacity then, interest paid by the firm to such individual in his
personal capacity and not as a representative capacity will not be subject to the
conditions and ceiling as prescribed for disallowance. But interest paid by the firm to
such individual as representative partner or person represented shall be subject to the
conditions and ceiling as prescribed [Explanation 1 to section 40(b)].
No deduction of tax shall be made where such sum or the aggregate of such sums
credited or paid or likely to be credited or paid to the partner of the firm does not
exceed ` 20,000 during the financial year.
ILLUSTRATION 8
M/s. HIG, a firm, consisting of three partners namely, H, I and G, carried on the
business of purchase and sale of television sets in wholesale and manufacture and
sale of pens under a deed of partnership executed on 1.4.2014. H, I and G were
partners in their individual capacity.
The deed of partnership provided for payment of salary amounting to ` 1,25,000 each
to H and G, who were the working partners. A new deed of partnership was executed
on 1.10.2025 which, apart from providing for payment of salary to the two working
partners as mentioned in the deed of partnership executed on 1.4.201 4, for the first
time provided for payment of simple interest @12% per annum on the balances
standing to the credit of the Capital accounts of partners from 1.4.202 5.
The firm was dissolved on 31.3.2026 and the capital assets of the firm were distributed
among the partners on 20.4.2026. The net profit of the firm for the year ended
31.3.2026 after payment of salary to the working partners and debit/credit of the
following items to the Profit and Loss Account was ` 3,50,000:
(i) Interest amounting to ` 1,00,000 paid to the partners on the balances standing
to the credit of their Capital accounts from 1.4.2025 to 31.3.2026.
(ii) Interest amounting to ` 50,000 paid to the partners on the balances standing
to the credit of their Current accounts from 1.4.2025 to 31.3.2026.
(iii) Interest amounting to ` 20,000 paid to the Hindu undivided family of partner H
@ 18% per annum.
(iv) Payment of ` 25,000 towards purchase of television sets (stock in trade) made
by crossed cheque on 1.11.2025.
(v) ` 30,000 being the value of gold jewellery received as gift from a manufacturer
for achieving sales target.
(vi) Depreciation amounting to ` 15,000 (as per Income-tax Rules) on motor car
bought and used exclusively for business purposes but registered in the name
of partner ‘H’.
9.82 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Notes:
(ii) The partnership deed of 1.10.2025 provides for payment of interest on balances
in capital accounts of partners only. As such, the interest paid on the balances
standing to the credit of the current accounts of partners is not allowable under
section 40(b). The Kerala High Court has, in Novel Distributing Enterprises v.
DCIT (2001) 251 ITR 704 (Ker), on identical facts, held that interest paid to the
partners on their current account balances is not allowable.
(iii) Since H is a partner in his individual capacity, interest paid to the Hindu
Undivided Family of partner H does not attract disallowance under section
40(b)(iv). Also, assuming that the provisions of section 40A(2) do not get
attracted in this case, such interest shall be allowed as deduction in full even
though the interest rate is more than 12% p.a.
(iv) Section 40A(3) provides for disallowances @100% of the expenditure incurred
for an amount exceeding ` 10,000 otherwise than by an account payee cheque
drawn on a bank or an account payee bank draft or use of electronic clearing
system through a bank account or through such other electronic mode as may
be prescribed. Since the firm has made payment of ` 25,000 towards purchase
of television sets by a crossed cheque and not by an account payee cheque,
100% of such expenditure would be disallowed.
(v) Gold jewellery valued at ` 30,000 received as gift from a manufacturer for
achieving sales target is taxable under section 28(iv), being a benefit arising
from business. Since it has already been credited to profit and loss account, no
further adjustment is required.
(vi) Depreciation on motor car bought and used exclusively for the purposes of
business is allowable though not registered in the name of the firm in view of
the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court in Mysore Minerals Ltd. v. CIT
(1999) 239 ITR 775.
(vii) The firm is entitled to additional depreciation @ 20% under section 32(1)(iia) in
respect of the new machinery installed for manufacture of pens. Since the new
machinery is put to use for less than 180 days during the relevant previous
year, the additional depreciation is restricted to 50% of the prescribed rate of
20% i.e., it is restricted to 10%. The balance additional depreciation can be
claimed in the immediately succeeding financial year.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.85
(viii) Interest received from bank on fixed deposits made out of surplus funds is
assessable under the head ‘Income from other sources’. Hence, it is not taken
into account for the purpose of computing book-profit.
(ix) As per para 24 of ICDS II: Valuation of Inventories, closing stock has to be
valued at net realizable value in the case of a dissolved firm. As such, the
closing stock-in-trade of the firm has to be valued at the net realizable value of
` 65,000. Since it has been valued at ` 60,000, being the cost, the balance
` 5,000 has to be added.
(x) Net profit shown in the profit and loss account computed in the manner laid
down in Chapter IV-D as increased by the aggregate amount of the
remuneration paid or payable to all the partners constitutes book profit as per
Explanation 3 to section 40(b). Carry forward and set off of business loss is
covered under Chapter VI. Hence, brought forward business loss relating to the
assessment year 2025-26 is not considered for calculation of book-profit.
(xi) Section 9B would be attracted in the hands of M/s HIG in the A.Y. 2027-28, since
capital assets are received by the partners on 20.4.2026, i.e., P.Y. 2026-27.
Computation of income of partner of a firm (PFAS): While computing the income
of a partner including a minor partner of a firm, the following points have to be taken
into consideration.
Share income exempt under section 10(2A): The partner’s share in the total income
of firm (PFAS) will be exempt in his hands and will not be included in his total income.
His share in the total income of the firm will be calculated as follows: -
Partner's share in profits of firm as per partnership deed
Total income of firm
Total profit of the firm
By virtue of this exemption, a partner of PFAS will not be taxed in respect of his share
in the firm’s income since the firm itself will be taxed as a separate entity @30%. There
will be no allocation of income among the partners. On account of this exemption, he
will not be entitled to set-off his share in the firm’s loss against his other personal
income.
Chargeability of remuneration and interest: Remuneration and interest received by
a partner of a PFAS in accordance with the conditions prescribed under section 40(b)
will be taxable in his hands as income from profits and gains of business or profession.
9.86 DIRECT TAX LAWS
remuneration of the partners and provides that 'book profit' shall mean the net
profit, as shown in the profit & loss account for the relevant previous year,
computed in the manner laid down in Chapter IV-D as increased by the
aggregate amount of the remuneration paid or payable to all the partners of the
firm if such amount has been deducted while calculating the net profit.
Therefore, while computing 'book profit' for purposes of section 40(b)(v), all
incomes such as capital gain, interest, rental income, income from other
sources etc. which do not fall under the head 'Profits and gains of business or
profession', should be excluded.
(iii) Under section 185, any non-compliance by the firm or its partners with
provisions of section 184 may result in denial of expenses such as
remuneration, interest etc. payable to the partners which are otherwise
allowable under the provisions of the Act.
(iv) Where firms try to inflate the profits eligible for deduction under section 80 -IA
by not claiming expenditure towards remuneration, salary, interest etc. which
are payable to the partners, the Assessing Officers may examine these
transactions in light of provisions of section 80-IA(10) which empower
Assessing Officer to re-compute profit of the eligible business after excluding
the profits of the related activity/business which produced the excessive profit.
Treatment of losses: If PFAS incurs any loss, the firm alone can set off and forward
such losses to be set off against income of the subsequent years. The firm will not be
allowed to apportion its unabsorbed losses among its partners.
Set off of carry forward loss in case of change in the constitution of the firm
[Section 78]: If there is a change in the constitution of the firm, the loss of a
retired/deceased partner can be carried forward by the firm only to the extent that it
does not exceed such partner’s share in the profits of the firm of the relevant previous
year.
Example: ABC & Co. is a firm with 3 partners – A, B & C having equal profit-sharing
ratio. For the P.Y. 2025-26, the loss from business is ` 3,00,000 and unabsorbed
depreciation is ` 1,50,000. Business loss and unabsorbed depreciation represents the
amount after inter-source and inter-head set-off. C retires on 31.03.2026 from the firm.
Firm can carry forward business loss of ` 2,00,000 (3,00,000 – 1,00,000) and
unabsorbed depreciation of ` 1,50,000 for set-off against income of subsequent
assessment years.
Liability of partner of LLP in liquidation [Section 167C]: This section provides for
the liability of partners of LLP in liquidation. In case of liquidation of an LLP, where tax
due from the LLP cannot be recovered, every person who was a partner of the LLP at
any time during the relevant previous year will be jointly and severally liable for
payment of such tax unless he proves that non-recovery cannot be attributed to any
gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the
LLP. This provision would also apply where tax is due from any other person in respect
of any income of any previous year during which such other person was a LLP. “Tax
due”, for the purpose of this section includes penalty, interest or any other sum payable
under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Assessment in case of change in constitution, succession and dissolution of a
firm [Section 187 to 189A]
Change in constitution of a firm: Where at the time of making an assessment under
section 143 or 144 it is found that a change has occurred in the constitution of a firm,
assessment shall be made on the firm as constituted at the time of making the
assessment.
Meaning of change in constitution of the firm: It means
(a) If one or more of the partners cease to be partners (other than a case where
ceases to be a partner by way of demise of the partner) or one or more new
partners are admitted, in such circumstances that one or more of the persons
who were partners of the firm before the change continue as partner or partners
after the change.
(b) All the partners of firm continue to be the partner of the firm but there is a
change in their profit-sharing ratio or change in shares of some of them.
Succession of one firm by another: In a case where a firm carrying on a business
or profession is succeeded by another firm; separate assessment will be made on the
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.89
predecessor firm and the successor firm in accordance with the provisions of section
170 [Section 188].
Liability of partners: Where any tax, penalty or other sum payable by the firm for the
relevant previous year is due, then every person being a partner of a firm and the legal
representative of deceased partner during the previous year shall be jointly and
severally liable along with the firm in respect of such sum [Section 188A].
Dissolution of firm or discontinuance of business: Where a firm is dissolved or
business or profession is discontinued by the firm, the Assessing Officer shall make
an assessment of the total income of the firm as if no discontinuance or dissolution
has taken place and all the provisions of the Act relating to levy of a penalty or any
other sum chargeable under this Act, shall be applicable accordingly [Section 189].
Every person who was at the time of dissolution or discontinuance a partner of a firm
and the legal representative of deceased partner shall be jointly and severally liable
for the amount of tax, penalty or other sum payable by the firm and all the provis ions
of the Act shall apply accordingly. If any proceedings have commenced in respect of
any assessment year before dissolution or discontinuance, the proceeding may be
continued against such persons (i.e., partner and legal representative) from that stage .
The liability of legal representative is limited to the extent to which the estate is capable
of meeting the liability.
ILLUSTRATION 9
Vijay Agencies, a partnership firm constituted by three partners with equal shares was
dissolved on 1-03-2025 after a search. The tax liability of the firm outstanding to be
paid was determined at ` 15 lakhs. Out of three partners, one was declared insolvent
on 18-03-2026 by the Court. The Assessing Officer, for recovering the demand,
9.90 DIRECT TAX LAWS
attached the Bank Accounts of other two partners and could recover an amount of ` 6
lakhs from the Account of one such partner. You are asked the following questions by
the partners of the dissolved firm:
(i) About the liability of each of them to pay outstanding demand.
(ii) Whether the action of Assessing Officer to attach the Bank Account of partners
to recover the tax demand of the dissolved firm is justified?
SOLUTION
As per section 189(3), every person who was at the time of dissolution, a partner of
the firm, shall be jointly and severally liable for the amount of tax, penalty or other sum
payable and all the provisions of the Act relating to assessment of such tax or
imposition of such penalty or other sum, shall apply. Therefore,
(i) the three partners (till one was declared as insolvent by the Court) are jointly
and severally liable for making the payment of outstanding dues of ` 15 lakhs.
After insolvency of one partner, the other two partners are jointly and severally
liable to pay such demand.
(ii) Accordingly, the action of the Assessing Officer to attach the bank accounts of
the partners for recovery of outstanding demand is correct and the amount of
` 6 lakhs recovered by attachment of the bank account of one of the partners
is also in order.
Conversion of company into an LLP
(i) Consequent to the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 coming into effect in
2009 and notification of the Limited Liability Partnership Rules w.e.f. 1st April,
2009, the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 had incorporated the taxation scheme of
LLPs in the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the same lines as applicable for general
partnerships, i.e. tax liability would be attracted in the hands of the LLP and tax
exemption would be available to the partners. Therefore, the same tax
treatment would be applicable for both general partnerships and LLPs.
(ii) Under section 56 and section 57 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008,
conversion of a private company or an unlisted public company into an LLP is
permitted. Consequently, section 47(xiiib) has been inserted under the Income-
tax Act, to provide that -
(1) any transfer of a capital asset or intangible asset by a private company
or unlisted public company to an LLP; or
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.91
calculated at the rate in force, since the date of its acquisition [Proviso to
Explanation 13 to section 43(1)]
(xi) If a company eligible for deduction under section 35DDA in respect of
expenditure incurred under Voluntary Retirement Scheme (one-fifth of such
expenditure allowable over a period of five years) is converted into an LLP and
such conversion satisfies the conditions laid down in section 47(xiiib), then, the
LLP would be eligible for such deduction from the year in which the transfer
took place.
(xii) If a shareholder of a company receives rights in a partnership firm as
consideration for transfer of shares on conversion of a company into a LLP,
then the cost of acquisition of the capital asset being rights of a partner referred
to in section 42 of the LLP Act, 2008 shall be deemed to be the cost of
acquisition to him of the shares in the predecessor company, immediately
before its conversion [Section 49(2AAA)].
(i) General provisions: The expression “co-operative society” means a society registered under
the Cooperative Societies Act, 1912 or under any other law for the time being in force in any
State for the registration of co-operative societies [Section 2(19)].
For taxation, it is treated as a separate assessable entity. The profits of any business of
insurance carried on by a co-operative society are to be computed in accordance with the
rules set out in the First Schedule to the Act. Apart from this, the comput ation of income in
the case of a co-operative society should also be made in the same way under each head of
income as in the case of any other assessee. Entrance fees received by a co -operative
society from its members is taxable as its income from business irrespective of the nature of
the business carried on by the society as was held in Co-operative Central Bank vs. C.l.T.
(1965) 57 ITR 579.
A member of a co-operative society to whom a building or a part thereof is allotted or leased
under a house building scheme of the society must be deemed to be the owner of that building
or part thereof under section 27(iii). Accordingly, the co-operative society is not liable to pay
tax in respect of the income from the house property even though it may be the real owner
according to official records and the tenant may have taken the building on lease. But where
the tenant is not a member of the society or where the house is allotted to him otherwise than
under a house building scheme of the society, the society will be liable to tax in respect of
the income of the house property.
9.94 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(ii) Deduction under section 80P: Section 80P provides certain exemptions to co-operative
societies. However, the exemption is not available to co-operative banks, other than primary
agricultural credit societies and primary co-operative agricultural and rural development
banks. (Students may refer to the detailed discussion of this provision in Chapter 8
“Deductions from Gross Total Income”.)
(iii) Option to exercise concessional rates of tax under section 115BAD or 115BAE: Section
115BAA provides an option to an existing domestic company to pay tax at concessional rate
of 22%, if it does not claim incentive/exemption and deduction as provided in said section.
Section 115BAB provides that manufacturing domestic companies set up on or after
01.10.2019, which commence manufacturing or production by 31.03.2024 and do not avail of
any specified incentive or deductions, may opt to pay tax at a concessional rate of 15%.
On similar lines, section 115BAD was inserted w.e.f. A.Y. 2021-22 to provide that a co-operative
society resident in India has the option to pay tax at 22%, subject to fulfilment of certain
conditions. Further, w.e.f. A.Y. 2024-25, section 115BAE has been inserted to provide an option
to a manufacturing co-operative society set up on or after 01.04.2023, which commences
manufacturing or production on or before 31.03.2024 and does not avail of any specified
incentive or deductions, may opt to pay tax at a concessional rate of 15%. In both cases,
surcharge would be levied @10% on such tax. However, it may be noted that deduction u/s
80P will not be available under the concessional tax regimes.
Sections 115BAE and 115BAD provides for concessional rates of tax and exemption from
Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) in respect of certain resident co-operative societies. The
provisions of these two sections are tabulated hereunder -
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Particulars Section 115BAE Section 115BAD
1. Applicability Co-operative society resident Co-operative society
in India engaged in resident in India
manufacturing/generation of
electricity
2. Rate of tax 15% 22%
3. Rate of surcharge 10% 10%
4. Effective rate of tax 17.16% 25.168%
(including surcharge [Tax@15% (+) [Tax@22% (+)
& HEC) Surcharge@10% (+) Surcharge@10% (+)
HEC@4%] HEC@4%]
5. Applicability of AMT Not applicable Not applicable
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.95
Note - For the purpose of point no.7(iv) in column (3) of the above table in relation to a co -
operative society exercising option under section 115BAE, any machinery or plant which was
used outside India by any other person shall not be regarded as machinery or plant previously
used for any purpose, if all the following conditions are fulfilled, namely: —
(a) such machinery or plant was not, at any time previous to the date of the installation,
used in India;
(b) such machinery or plant is imported into India from any country outside India;
(c) no deduction on account of depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has
been allowed or is allowable under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in
computing the total income of any person for any period prior to the date of installation
of the machinery or plant by the person.
Further, where in the case of a person, any machinery or plant or any part thereof previously
used for any purpose is put to use by the co-operative society and the total value of the
machinery or plant or part so transferred does not exceed 20% of the total value of the
machinery or plant used by the co-operative society, then, the condition specified that the co-
operative society does not use any machinery or plant previously used for any purpose would
be deemed to have been complied with.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.103
ILLUSTRATION 10
Transfer fees are received by a cooperative housing society from its incoming and outgoing
members. Are such transfer fees liable to tax in the hands of the cooperative society?
SOLUTION
The issue under consideration is whether the transfer fees received by a co -operative housing
society from its incoming and outgoing members is taxable or exempt on the principle of mutuality.
On this issue, the High Court, in Sind Co-operative Housing Society v. ITO (2009) 317 ITR 47, observed
that under the byelaws of the society, charging of transfer fees had no element of trading or
commerciality. Both the incoming and outgoing members have to contribute to the common fund of the
assessee. The amount paid was to be exclusively used for the benefit of the members as a class.
The High Court, therefore, held that transfer fees received by a co-operative housing society, whether
from outgoing or from incoming members, is not liable to tax on account of the principle of mutuality,
since the predominant activity of such co-operative society is maintenance of property of the society and
there is no taint of commerciality, trade or business.
Further, section 28(iii), which provides that income derived by a trade, professional or similar
association from specific services performed for its members shall be treated as business income,
can have no application since the co-operative housing society is not a trade or professional
association.
Applying the rationale of the above ruling, transfer fees received by a co-operative housing society from
its incoming and outgoing members would not be liable to tax in the hands of the co-operative society.
TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS/HUF/AOPs OR BOIs
(1) Default Tax Regime [Section 115BAC]
Individuals/ Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)/ Association of Persons (AoPs) other than a co-operative
society / Body of Individuals (BoIs) and Artificial Juridical Persons have to pay tax at concessional
rates of tax provided under section 115BAC. The tax rates given under section 115BAC are the
default tax rates unless the assessee exercises an option to shift out of the said regime. However,
such persons have to forego certain exemptions and deductions under this regime. Alternatively,
they can exercise the option to shift out of the default tax regime and pay tax under the optional tax
regime as per the regular provisions of the Act at the tax rates prescribed by the Annual Finance Act
of that year.
9.104 DIRECT TAX LAWS
II. Conditions to be satisfied for availing concessional rates of tax: The following are the
conditions to be satisfied for availing concessional rates of tax:
S. No. Particulars
(1) Certain deductions/exemptions not allowable: Section 115BAC(2) provides that while
computing total income, the following deductions/exemptions would not be allowed:
Section Exemption/Deduction
10(5) Leave travel concession
10(13A) House rent allowance
10(14) Exemption in respect of special allowances or benefit to meet
expenses relating to duties or personal expenses (other than
those as may be prescribed for this purpose).
10(17) Daily allowance or constituency allowance of MPs and MLAs
10(32) Exemption in respect of income of minor child included in the
income of parent
10AA Tax holiday for units established in SEZ
16 (i) Entertainment allowance
(ii) Professional tax
24(b) Interest on loan in respect of self-occupied property
32(1)(iia) Additional depreciation
33AB Tea/Coffee/Rubber development account
33ABA Site Restoration Fund
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.105
III. Time limit for exercising the option to shift out of the default tax regime
(i) In case of an assessee having no income from business or profession: Where such
individual/HUF/AoP (other than a co-operative society)/BoI or Artificial Juridical person is not
having income from business or profession, he/it can exercise an option to shift out/opt out of
the default tax regime under this section and such option has to be exercised along with the
return of income to be furnished under section 139(1) for a previous year relevant to the
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.107
Thereafter, such person shall never be eligible to exercise option under this section, except
where such person ceases to have any business income in which case, option under (i) above
would be available.
AMT liability not attracted: Individual/HUF/AoP/BoI or Artificial Juridical person paying tax under
default tax regime under section 115BAC is not liable to alternate minimum tax u/s 115JC. Such
person would not be eligible to claim AMT credit also.
Note: It may be noted that in case of Individual/HUF/AoP/BoI or Artificial Juridical person not having
income from business or profession, the total income and tax liability (including provisions relating
to AMT, if applicable under normal provisions) may be computed every year both in accordance with
the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and in accordance with the provisions of section
115BAC, in order to determine which is more beneficial and accordingly such person may decide
whether to pay tax under default tax regime under section 115BAC or exercise the option to shift out
and pay tax under normal provisions of the Act for that year.
(2) Taxation of Individuals
The term “individual” as such has nowhere been defined in the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 2(31),
however, states that “person” inter alia, includes an individual. In the commonly understood sense
of the term, an individual means a human being or a single person. The person may be major, minor,
married or unmarried, possessing sound or unsound mind. All the same, he is assessable as an
‘individual’ and is liable to pay tax, if the total income earned by him during any previous year
9.108 DIRECT TAX LAWS
exceeds the prescribed limit exempted from tax. If an individual who is liable to pay tax for any year
dies before he is assessed to tax, his executor, administrator or legal representative is treated as
the individual assessee for purposes of assessment of the income of the deceased person.
(i) Tax rates
Individual assessee can pay tax at concessional rates under the default tax regime under
section 115BAC (discussed above). However, he has to forego certain exemptions and
deductions under this regime. Alternatively, he can exercise the option to shift out of the
default tax regime and pay tax under the optional tax regime as per the regular provisions of
the Act at the tax rates prescribed by the Annual Finance Act of that year.
[The slab rates for A.Y. 2026-27 applicable to an Individual/HUF/AOP/BOI/ Artificial Juridical
Person exercising the option of shifting out of the default tax regime are discussed in Chapter
1 in Module 1]
(ii) Assessment of a non-resident individual
The scope of deemed income taxable in the hands of a non-resident as laid down in section
5 is explained in section 9(1) which extends the liability to tax of a non-resident individual in
respect of income which although not actually accruing or arising in India deemed to be so
accruing or arising, assumes significance in the assessment of non-resident individual. For
better understanding of the provisions of section 9, students are advised to refer to Chapter
21 - “Non-resident Taxation in Module 4 of the Study material.
(iii) Special concessions in the case of individuals not being citizens of India
Although basically the law of income-tax is applicable alike to both citizens and non-citizens
of India, and there is no difference in the general principles for computing the total income
under the Income-tax Act, 1961, however, on a consideration of the peculiar circumstances
in which a foreigner might come to or live in India, certain concessions and reliefs are granted
to them under section 10(6). These have been discussed in detail in Chapter 21 –“Non-
resident Taxation in Module 4 of the Study material.
(iv) Exemptions, reliefs and concessional rates of tax available to individuals
The tax exemptions and reliefs available under the Act to individuals in respect of income
chargeable to tax fall under the following categories:
(a) Income altogether excluded from the total income, and on which in consequence, no
income-tax is payable [Section 10].
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.109
(b) Deductions from gross total income both in respect of income, a part of which is not
chargeable to income-tax and payments made by the assessee, a part or the whole of
which is deductible from the gross total income [Chapter VI-A]
However, certain exemptions and deductions are not available where an individual is paying
tax as per the default regime under section 115BAC(1A).
(v) Rebate of tax and relief in certain cases
Income from association of persons or bodies of individuals: If the assessee is a
member of an association of persons or a body of individuals (other than a company,
co-operative society or society) income-tax shall not be payable by him in respect of
any portion of the amount receivable by him from the association or body on which tax
has already been paid by the association or body at the maximum marginal rate or any
higher rate [Section 86].
Further, if the total income of AOP or BOI is not chargeable to income -tax, then the
share of member shall be chargeable to tax as part of his total income. Thus, in such
case, the share of member shall form part of his total income.
For the purposes of this provision in the case of an association of persons which is
assessable under section 67A, the members of the AOP whose shares in the income
are indeterminate or unknown, will be entitled to receive equal shares in the income
of the AOP and the individual share of such member will be determined accordingly.
Rebate of income-tax to an individual resident in India: In order to provide tax relief
to the individual tax payers, section 87A provides a rebate from the tax payable by an
assessee, being an individual resident in India.
Rebate to resident individual paying tax under default tax regime u/s 115BAC
(i) If the total income of the resident individual is chargeable to tax under section
115BAC and the total income of such individual does not exceed ` 12,00,000,
the rebate shall be equal to the amount of income-tax payable on his total income
for any assessment year or an amount of ` 60,000, whichever is less.
The amount of rebate under section 87A shall not exceed the amount of
income-tax (as computed before allowing such rebate) on the total income of
the assessee with which he is chargeable for any assessment year.
It is further provided that the rebate shall not exceed the amount of income-tax
computed as per the rates provided in section 115BAC.
9.110 DIRECT TAX LAWS
ILLUSTRATION 11
Mr. X aged 34 years and a resident in India, has a total income of ` 11,70,000,
comprising his salary income and interest on bank fixed deposit. Compute his tax
liability for A.Y.2026-27 under default tax regime under section 115BAC.
SOLUTION
Computation of tax liability of Mr. X for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars `
Tax on total income of ` 11,70,000
5% of ` 4,00,000 i.e., from ` 4,00,000 to ` 8,00,000] 20,000
10% of ` 3,70,000 i.e., from ` 8,00,001 to ` 11,70,000 37,000
57,000
Less: Rebate u/s 87A (Lower of tax payable or ` 60,000) 57,000
Tax Liability Nil
(ii) If the total income of the resident individual is chargeable to tax under section
115BAC and the total income of such individual exceeds ` 12,00,000 and
income-tax payable on such total income exceeds the amount by which the total
income is in excess of ` 12,00,000, the rebate would be as follows.
Step 1 – Total income (-) ` 12 lakhs (A)
Step 2 - Compute income-tax liability on total income (B)
Step 3 - If B > A, rebate under section 87A would be a B – A.
The amount of rebate under section 87A shall not exceed the amount of
income-tax (as computed before allowing such rebate) on the total income of
the assessee.
It is further provided that the rebate shall not exceed the amount of income-tax
computed as per the rates provided in section 115BAC.
ILLUSTRATION 12
Ms. Pallavi aged 32 years and a resident in India, has a total income of
` 12,18,000, comprising his salary income and interest on bank fixed deposit.
Compute her tax liability for A.Y.2026-27 under default tax regime under section
115BAC.
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.111
SOLUTION
Computation of tax liability of Ms. Pallavi for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars `
Step 1: Total Income of ` 12,18,000 - ` 12,00,000 18,000 (A)
Step 2: Tax on total income of ` 12,18,000
Tax@15% of ` 18,000 + ` 60,000 62,700 (B)
Step 3: Since B > A, rebate u/s 87A would be B - A
[` 62,700 - ` 18,000] 44,700
18,000
Add: HEC@4% 720
Tax Liability 18,720
Rebate to a resident individual paying tax under optional tax regime (normal
provisions of the Act)
If total income of such individual does not exceed ` 5,00,000, the rebate shall be
equal to the amount of income-tax payable on his total income for any assessment
year or an amount of ` 12,500, whichever is less.
The amount of rebate under section 87A shall not exceed the amount of income -tax
(as computed before allowing such rebate) on the total income of the assessee with
which he is chargeable for any assessment year.
Rebate is, however, not available in respect of tax payable on long-term capital gains
taxable u/s 112A.
Relief from taxation in respect of income from retirement benefit account
maintained in a notified country [Section 89A]: Where a specified person has
income accrued in a specified account, such income shall be taxed in such manner
and in such year as may be prescribed.
Meaning of certain terms:
Terms Meaning
Specified account An account maintained in a notified country by the specified
person in respect of his retirement benefits and the income
from such account is not taxable on accrual basis but is taxed
by such country at the time of withdrawal or redemption.
Notified country A country as notified by the Central Government. So far vide
Notification No. 25/2022, dated 4.4.2022, Canada, USA and
UK have been notified by the Central Government.
9.112 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Accordingly, the CBDT has, vide Notification No.24/2022 dated 4.4.2022 inserted Rule
21AAA providing for taxation of income from retirement benefit account maintained in
a notified country.
Exclusions from total income of specified person - Where the option has been
exercised by a specified person, the total income of the specified person for the
previous year in which income is taxable would not include the income which:
- has already been included in the total income of such specified person in any
of the earlier previous years during which such income accrued and tax thereon
has been paid under the Act; or
- was not taxable in India, in the previous year during which such income
accrued, on account of,
Foreign tax, if any, paid on such income would be ignored for the purposes of
computation of the foreign tax credit under Rule 128.
Option once exercised cannot be withdrawn - The option has to be exercised in the
prescribed form, which has to be furnished electronically under digital signature or
electronic verification code on or before the due date u/s 139(1). The option once
exercised for a specified account(s) in respect of a previous year in the prescribed
form would apply to all subsequent previous years and cannot be subsequently
a
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.113
withdrawn for the previous year for which the option was exercised or any previous
year subsequent to that previous year (except in case where the specified person
becomes a non-resident in any subsequent previous year).
Higher surcharge of 25% and 37% is leviable, where the total income of individuals/
HUF/AOPs/BoIs/artificial juridical persons exceeds ` 2 crores and ` 5 crores, respectively,
and the individual has exercised the option to shift out of the default regime under section
115BAC. However, the higher surcharge rates would not be applicable on tax payable on
dividend income or tax payable at special rates under section 111A, 112 and 112A. Further,
where an individual is paying tax as per the default regime under section 115BAC(1A),
the maximum rate of surcharge is 25% for total income exceeding ` 2 crores.
[Refer to Chapter 1: Basic Concepts in Module 1 of the Study Material, containing rates of
surcharge for understanding the manner of computation of surcharge on capital gains,
dividend and other income components of total income]
avv
9.114 DIRECT TAX LAWS
avv
(3) Taxation of Hindu Undivided Families
(i) Concept of HUF
A Hindu undivided family (HUF) is treated as a separate entity for the purpose of
assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is included in the definition of the term
“person” under section 2(31). The levy of income-tax is on “every person”. Therefore,
income-tax is payable by a HUF.
"Hindu undivided family" has not been defined under the Income-tax Act. The expression is,
however, defined under the Hindu Law as a family, which consists of all males lineally
descended from a common ancestor and includes their wives and daughters.
Some members of the HUF are called co-parceners. They are related to each other and to
the head of the family. HUF may contain many members, but members within four degrees
including the head of the family (Karta) are called co-parceners. A Hindu Coparcenary
includes those persons who acquire an interest in joint family property by birth. Earlier, only
male descendants were considered as coparceners. With effect from 6th September, 2005,
daughters have also been accorded coparcenary status. It may be noted that only the
coparceners have a right to demand partition.
A daughter of coparcener by birth shall become a coparcener in her own right in the same
manner as the son. Being a coparcener, she can claim partition of assets of the family. The
rights of a daughter in coparcenary property are equal to that of a son. However, other
female members of the family, for example, wife or daughter-in-law of a coparcener are
mere members of the HUF and are not eligible for such coparcenary rights.
The existence of a HUF does not arise from a contract but arises from status. There need
not be more than one male member or one female coparcener w.e.f. 6 th September, 2005 to
form a HUF. The Income-tax Act, 1961 also does not indicate that a HUF as an assessable
entity must consist of at least two male members or two coparceners.
Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, Jain undivided families and Sikh undivided families would
also be assessed as a HUF.
The basic difference between the two schools of Hindu law with regard to succession is as
follows: v
Dayabaga school of law Mithakshara school of law
Prevalent in West Bengal and Assam. Prevalent in rest of India.
Nobody acquires the right, share in the property by One acquires the right to the
birth as long as the head of family is living. family property by his birth and
not by succession irrespective
of the fact that his elders are
living.
Thus, the children do not acquire any right, share in Thus, every child born in the
the family property, as long as his father is alive and family acquires a right/ share in
only on death of the father, the children will acquire the family property.
right/share in the property.
Hence, the father and his brothers would be the
coparceners of the HUF.
(b) Section 10(2) exempts any receipt by an individual as a member of a HUF out of the
family income. v
(c) If a member of the HUF receives any fee or remuneration as a director or a partner
in a company or firm as a consequence of the investment made in such concern out
of the funds of the HUF, such fee/remuneration shall constitute income of the HUF.
However, any such fee or remuneration earned by a member of a HUF as a director
or partner for services rendered purely in his personal capacity, will be included in
the income of the individual member and not the HUF.
(v) Tax rates
HUF can pay tax at concessional rates under the default tax regime under section 115BAC
(discussed earlier). However, it has to forego certain exemptions and deductions under this
regime. Alternatively, it can exercise the option to shift out of the default tax regime and pay
tax under the optional tax regime as per the regular provisions of the Act at the tax rates
prescribed by the Annual Finance Act of that year.
[The slab rates for A.Y. 2026-27 applicable to an Individual/HUF/AOP/BOI/ Artificial
Juridical Person, exercising the option of shifting out of the default tax regime are discussed
in Chapter 1 in Module 1].
(vi) Rates of surcharge applicable to HUF
Higher surcharge of 25% and 37% is leviable, where the total income of individuals/ HUF/
AOPs/BOIs/artificial juridical persons exceeds ` 2 crores and ` 5 crores, respectively and
the HUF has exercised the option to shift out of the default tax regime. However, the higher
surcharge would not be applicable on tax payable on dividend income and tax payable at
special rates under section 111A, 112 and 112A. Further, where an HUF is paying tax as
per the default regime under section 115BAC(1A), the maximum rate of surcharge is 25%
for total income exceeding ` 2 crores. [Refer to Chapter 1: Basic Concepts containing rates
of surcharge for understanding the manner of computation of surcharge on capital gains,
dividends and other income components of total income].
(vii) Conversion of separate property into property of HUF
Generally, income from self-acquired property of an individual, who is a member of a HUF
will be assessed as his personal income and not as the income of the family. However, the
individual can convert his separate properties into the property of the HUF. There are no
legal formalities to be complied with. These principles have been upheld by various judicial
rulings.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.118
avv
It naturally follows that once the assets belonging to the individual are impressed with the
character of joint family property, the income arising therefrom, should be assessed as the
income of the HUF. However, the deeming provisions of section 64(2) specifically provide
that the entire income from the converted property is taxable as the income of the
transferor. This provision applies not only to property converted in the above manner but
also covers transfer of property by an individual, directly or indirectly, to the family
otherwise than for adequate consideration, in other words, gifts. Accordingly, where an
individual makes direct or indirect gift of his separate property to the Hindu Undivided family
of which he is a member or if he transfers his separate property to his family for less than
its fair market value, nothing would be taxable in the hands of HUF u/s 56(2)(x) and the
provisions of section 64(2) will be attracted and the entire income from such separate
property converted into HUF property will be included in the total income of the individual.
(viii) Business in the personal capacity of the Karta or member
Where the Karta or any member of a joint family carries on a business on his personal
capacity, the income from any such business would constitute his personal income. It does
not matter even if the business of the member and of the joint family are identical in nature
and size. Suppose the capital for the individual’s business is borrowed from the funds of the
family what will be the position? Consider the following example.
Example: A HUF consists of the Karta, his wife, two sons and daughter. The HUF runs a
departmental store. One of the two sons is qualified in business administration and the
other one is an automobile engineer. Together they start a garage for repairing all types of
motor cars. The technical aspects are looked after by the engineer while the general
administration is taken care of by the son qualified in business administration. For starting
the business, the HUF has advanced an interest-free loan of ` 50,000. The business is
yielding good profits. Now the question arises whether the income from the business should
be assessed in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.
It is obvious that the family, in providing the interest-free loan to the business of the brothers
has suffered a detriment. However, the Delhi High Court has laid down the following
proposition in this connection in the case of CIT vs. Charandass Khanna & Sons (1980) 123
ITR 194 (Delhi). If investment plays a minor role and it is primarily the personal efforts,
specialised skill and enterprise of the individual coparceners which resulted in the new
business being set up and the profits accruing, it may not essentially be said that the income
belongs to the HUF. In the present case, the good profits are more due to the specialised
skills acquired by the two sons in their respective fields. Of course, the capital, got from the
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.119
family as interest free loan, has its role to play but it is nevertheless a minor one. Therefore,
we can say that the income from the business set up by the brothers is assessable invtheir
hands as individuals according to the agreed rate of sharing and not as the income of the
family.
The Supreme Court has also upheld this principle in K.S. Subbiah Pillai vs. CIT (237 ITR
11). It was held that remuneration received on account of personal qualification and
exercise of individual exertion was assessable as individual income and not as income of
HUF. The following principles have been
broadly applied by the Supreme Court for Remuneration received on
determining the character of the receipt by account of personal qualification
way of remuneration paid to a coparcener: and exercise of individual
exertion is assessable as
(i) when the remuneration received by the individual’s income and not as
coparcener though not in form but in income of HUF.
substance was one of the modes of
return made to the family because of
investment of the family funds, it has to be assessed as the income of Joint Hindu
Family.
(ii) when the remuneration is not paid to the detriment of the family funds, it is
assessable as the income of recipient Karta or coparcener as an individual.
(iii) when it is a compensation for the services, skill or labour of the coparcener, it has to
be assessed as the income of such a coparcener in his individual capacity.
Example: The Karta of a HUF receives salary in his capacity as a treasurer and secretary
of a bank. The HUF has furnished ` 1,00,000 as security deposit. Decide whether the
salary can be assessed as the income of the HUF.
The position of treasurer and secretary requires considerable personal skill and integrity on
the part of the incumbent. It is true that the security deposit might have been furnished by
the HUF, however, since the salary is paid to the Karta primarily for the exercise of his
personal skill and integrity, it is to be assessed as his individual income.
payment is genuine and not excessive, such remuneration would be an expenditure laid out
v
wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business of the family and would be allowable
as an expenditure.
(xi) Salary paid to member
A Hindu undivided family can be allowed to deduct salaries paid to member of the family if
the payment is made as a matter of commercial or business expediency, but the service
rendered must be to the family.
(xii) Gifts to HUF
Can an outsider make a gift to HUF? Under what circumstances will a gift made by an
outsider be considered as a gift to the HUF? The answers to these questions are as follows:
(a) If the HUF to which such a gift is made consists of only one coparcener, then the
gifted property can be held by the members of the family only as tenants -in-common,
i.e., the income arising out of such gifted property can be assessed as income in the
hands of the Association of Persons (AOP).
(b) If the HUF to which such a gift is made consists of minimum two coparceners, then
the gifted property can be held by the members of the family as joint tenants and the
income arising out of such gifted property can be assessed as income in the hands
of the joint Hindu family.
Section 56(2)(x) provides that any sum of money or value of property received by a
HUF without consideration would be chargeable to income-tax under the head
“Income from other sources”, if the aggregate value or in case of immovable property
stamp duty value of the property exceeds ` 50,000 during a year. However, a sum
received by a HUF from its relative, i.e., a member of the HUF, is exempt. For
details, refer Chapter 5 on “Income from other sources”.
ILLUSTRATION 13
Mr. Ram (aged 56) is Karta of his HUF. The HUF consists of himself, his wife and two sons viz.
Mr. C (aged 28) and Minor D (aged 16). The HUF is assessed to income tax and has business
income from the year 2015-16 onwards. The business income of HUF for the year ended
31.3.2026 is ` 5,00,000 (computed). Mr. Ram is employed in a private company and his salary
income for the same period is ` 6,10,000 (computed).
You are requested to answer the following treating each of them as independent situations:
(i) Mr. C gave cash gift of ` 1,00,000 to the HUF of Mr. Ram. What would be the total income of HUF?
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.122
avv
(ii) The HUF has one house property fetching rent of ` 10,000 per month and some movable
assets. There is a proposal to make a partial partition of HUF by allotting the house
property to Mr. C. Is it advisable to do a partial partition?
(iii) Minor D earned ` 70,000 by use of his special skill and talent. How would his income be taxed?
(iv) A car owned personally by Mr. Ram was blended with HUF during the year. It was leased
out for a monthly rent of ` 10,000 from 1-10-2025. How would this income be taxed?
SOLUTION
(i) Cash gift of ` 1 lakh by Mr. C, Ram’s major son, to the HUF of Mr. Ram would not be
taxable in the hands of the HUF, since gifts from a relative of the HUF does not fall within
the scope of income taxable under section 56(2)(x). Since Mr. C, being Mr. Ram’s son, is a
member of Ram’s HUF, he is a relative of the HUF. Hence, the total income of HUF would
be ` 5 lakhs, being the business income computed.
Note - Salary income of Mr. Ram, the Karta of the HUF, who is employed in a private
company would be taxed in his individual hands, since the remuneration earned by the
Karta on account of the personal qualifications and exertions and not on account of the
investment of the family funds cannot be treated as income of the HUF.
(ii) Partial partition (after 31.12.1978) is not recognized and the HUF, which has been hitherto
assessed to tax, shall continue to be liable to be assessed as if no such partial partition has
taken place [Section 171(9)].
The rental income in this case would continue to be assessed in the hands of the HUF,
even after partial partition. Therefore, it is not advisable to do a partial partition.
(iii) Income of ` 70,000 earned by Minor D by use of his special skill and talent would be
taxable in his individual hands. It will not be included in the hands of his parent by virtue of
the exception to section 64(1A) contained in the proviso to section 64(1A) .
(iv) As per section 64(2), where a member of the HUF blends his self-acquired property for
inadequate consideration with the HUF, income derived therefrom is deemed to arise to the
transferor-member and not to the HUF. In this case, Mr. Ram has blended his personal
property (i.e., car) with the HUF.
Since there is no consideration in case of blending, the income from car computed in the
prescribed manner, [which can be as per the presumptive provisions or lease rental of ` 60,000
(` 10,000 × 6 months) less depreciation] would be deemed as the income of Mr. Ram.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.123
not paid tax on its total the member’s share will be included in his total income
income and taxed at regular rates.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.127
Compute tax liability of the AOP assuming that J exercises the option to shift out of the default
regime and the AOP and its member K pays tax under default tax regime under section v
115BAC(1A).
SOLUTION
Computation of tax of AOP is governed by section 167B. Tax on total income of AOP is computed
as follows:
(i) If individual share of a member is known, and the total income of any member, excluding
his share from such AOP, exceeds the basic exemption limit, then, the AOP will pay tax at
the maximum marginal rate.
(ii) If individual share of a member is known and no member has total income (excluding his
share from AOP) exceeding the basic exemption limit, then, the AOP will pay tax at the
rates applicable to an individual.
Section 86 provides for assessment of share in the hands of members of AOP as follows:
(i) If an AOP has paid tax at the maximum marginal rate or a higher rate, the member’s share
in the total income of AOP will not be included in his total income and will be exempt.
(ii) If the AOP has paid tax at regular rates applicable to an individual, the member’s share in
the income of AOP will be included in his total income and he will be allowed rebate at the
average rate of tax in respect of such share.
Tax Liability of J K Associates, AOP
Since none of the members have income, other than income from the AOP, exceeding the basic
exemption limit, the AOP would be taxed at the rates applicable to an individual. Therefore, the
AOP’s tax liability would be follows:
` 4,00,000 – ` 8,00,000 @5% ` 20,000
` 8,00,001 – ` 11,00,000 @10% ` 30,000
` 50,000
Add: Health & education cess @4% 2,000
Tax Liability 52,000
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.130
avv
Tax Liability of J and K
Particulars J K
` `
Share of profit from AOP 6,60,000 4,40,000
Income from other sources 2,50,000 2,90,000
Total Income (A) 9,10,000 7,30,000
Tax liability 94,500 16,500
Add: Health and Education cess @ 4% 3,780 660
Total tax (B) 98,280 17,160
Average rate of tax [B/A x 100] 10.8% 2.351%
Total tax liability 98,280 17,160
Less: Rebate under section 86 read with section 110 in respect
of share of profit from AOP (share in AOP x Average rate of tax) 71,280 10,344
its own jurisdiction area or from the supply of water or electricity within or outside its own
jurisdictional area are totally exempt from tax. v
In other words, a local authority is taxable only in respect of the income arising to it from any
business carried on by it provided that such income arises from the supply of any commodity or
service, not being water or electricity outside its jurisdictional area, i.e., territorial limits.
A local authority is said to be resident at the place where the control and management of its
affairs are situated, and its residential status is governed by section 6(4). A local authority in
India is always resident in India, except where the control and management of its affairs is
exercised wholly from outside India.
(iii) Tax rate
After total income, i.e., the income of a local authority chargeable to tax has been determined,
the whole of it would attract tax at the rate applicable i.e., the one prescribed by the relevant
Finance Act. There is no minimum amount exempt from tax in the case of a local authority. For
income tax purposes, local authority is chargeable to tax at 30% on its total income of the
previous year computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act, plus surcharge @ 12% if
its total income exceeds ` 1 crore plus health and education cess @ 4%.
A trade, professional or similar association may be a mutual concern. Section 28(iii) enacts
that “income derived by a trade, professional or similar association from specific services
performed for its members” shall be taxable as business profits. Under section 2(24)(v) any
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.133
sum chargeable under section 28(iii) is deemed to be income. The object of these
v to
provisions seems to be to tax as profit the surplus arising from specific services rendered
members by a mutual trade, professional or similar association which otherwise may not be
liable to tax in view of the general principles applicable to mutual concerns.
It may carefully be noted that a trade association is not the same thing as a trading
association. A trade association means an association of tradesmen or businessmen for the
protection or advancement of their common interests. Again clause (iii) of section 28 taxes
the profit accruing only on specific services rendered by an association to its members. Any
surplus arising to a mutual association in other way e.g. from entrance fees or members’
periodic subscriptions would be outside the scope of this clause and would be non -taxable
on the general principles stated above.
Since the surplus arising to trade, professional or similar association during the process of
advancement of the common interest of the members is not includible in the taxable income
it follows that the concerned expenditure will not also be allowed. Section 44A gives a
benefit in this regard. It provides that in the case of such trade associations which did not
distribute any parts of its income to its members, the amount of any deficit (deficiency)
(excess of expenditure incurred for the advancement of the common interest of the
members of the association over receipt from the members) would be deductible from the
assessable income of the association to the maximum extent of 50% of such income.
This deficiency is to be deducted in the first instance from the assessable income under the
head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. If the deficiency exceeds such income
the balance of deficiency can be set off against assessable income from any other head.
The maximum limit of 50%, however, still operates. It should be noted that any adjustment
of the deficiency is permissible only after effect has been given as provided in the Act to all
losses, allowances etc., for the year in question or brought forward from earlier years.
(iv) Clubs
The consensus of judicial opinion is that any surplus accruing to a members’ club from the
subscriptions and charges for various conveniences paid by members is not income or
profit at all, nor can a social club be deemed to trade as far as its dealings with its own
members are concerned. The position would be the same even though the club may be
incorporated as a company or registered as a society. But a club is taxable on the profit
derived from subscriptions and charges paid by non-members and on the income derived
from its capital assets. Where a club is an incorporated company carrying on business it
may be taxable on the money received from its members as well as non-members in the
course of its business.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.134
avv
However, if the club is not a member’s club but is a proprietary club i.e. if the club is owned
by an outsider and not by the members themselves, the proprietor would be taxable on the
profits earned by running the club. The position would not in any way be affected by the fact
that the proprietor is a limited company and some of the shareholders are members of the
club.
succession, shall be deemed to have been made or initiated on the successor and all the
provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly. v
business would get reduced and correspondingly, the incidence of tax would also be
reduced. v
Under sole proprietorship, the entire income of a business unit gets assessed in the hands
of the same person along with other income, while the entire loss and other allowances
shall be available for set off in his hands against other income. This may have some
advantage in the initial years, after which the possibility of converting it into company/firm
may be considered; on such conversion, the questions of possible capital gains tax, etc.,
will have to be considered.
Hindu Undivided Family: The Hindu undivided family as a unit of taxation continues to
exist for the purpose of carrying on business as well and there is a large number of cases
where business is carried on by the members of the family on behalf on the family. Since
the law does not specifically provide for the disallowance of such expenses, it is
advantageous to carry on a business through the HUF wherever possible. The income of
the family is computed and first taxed in the hands of the family at the rates applicable to it.
The income of the family may, thereafter, be divided amongst the members of the family
and the members, in such cases, do not attract any liability to tax in view of the specific
exemption granted under section 10(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Thus, if a business is
carried on by a Hindu undivided family, the advantages which are available in the case of a
company could be fully availed of and in addition, the members of the family would not
become liable to tax when they receive any portion of the family’s income.
Individual or HUF having income from business or profession has an option to shift out/ opt
out of the default tax regime under this section and the option has to be exercised on or
before the due date specified under section 139(1) for furnishing the return of income for
such previous year and once such option is exercised, it would apply to subsequent
assessment years.
Such person who has exercised the above option of shifting out of the default tax regime for
any previous year shall be able to withdraw such option only once and pay tax under the
default tax regime under section 115BAC for a previous year other than the year in which it
was exercised.
Thereafter, such person shall never be eligible to exercise option under this section, except
where such person ceases to have any business income in which case, option under (i)
above would be available. (Please refer to the detailed discussion on section 115BAC
given in earlier paras of this Chapter)
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.138
avv
Partnership Firm/LLP: All firms and LLPs will be taxed at a flat rate of 30%. If the total
income exceeds ` 1 crore, surcharge @12% would be attracted. Further, health and
education cess @4% would be applicable. There will be no basic exemption and the entire
income will be taxed. In computing the taxable income of a firm, certain prescribed
deductions in respect of interest and remuneration have to be allowed. The share income of
a firm in the hands of the partners of the firm which is separately assessed as such is fully
exempt under section 10(2A).
TDS Liability on Partnership Firm: As per section 194T, partnership firm is required to
deduct tax at source @10% on any sum paid to partners, such as salary, remuneration,
commission, bonus, or interest. No deduction is required if the sum or aggregate of
such sum does not exceed ` 20,000 during the financial year.
Note: An Individual, HUF or a partnership firm (but not an LLP), who is a resident carrying
on eligible business can declare income on presumptive basis as per the provisions of
section 44AD @8% of gross receipts or 6% in case gross receipts are received by an
account payee cheque/bank draft/use of ECS through bank account /through any other
electronic mode as may be prescribed on or before the due date of filing return of income ].
The prescribed electronic modes are credit card, debit card, net banking, IMPS (Immediate
payment Service), UPI (Unified Payment Interface), RTGS (Real Time Gross Settlement),
NEFT (National Electronic Funds Transfer), and BHIM (Bharat Interface for Money) Aadhar
Pay [CBDT Notification No. 8/2020 dated 29.01.2020].
An assessee, being a resident in India, carrying on notified profession can declare income
on presumptive basis@50% of gross receipts as per the provisions of section 44ADA. In
such a case, they need not get their books of account audited as per section 44AB.
ILLUSTRATION 15
Mr. Gavaskar sought voluntary retirement from a Government of India Undertaking and received
compensation of ` 40 lakhs on 28th February, 2025. He is planning to use the money as capital for
a business dealership in electronic goods. The manufacturer of the product requires a security
deposit of ` 15 lakhs, which would carry interest at 8% p.a. Gavaskar’s wife is a graduate and has
worked as marketing manager in a multinational company for 15 years. She now looks for a
change in employment. She is willing to join her husband in running the business. She expects an
annual income of ` 5 lakhs. Mr. Gavaskar would like to draw a monthly remuneration of ` 40,000
and also interest @ 10% p.a. on his capital in the business. Mr. Gavaskar has approached you for
a tax efficient structure of the business.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.139
Discuss the various issues, which are required to be considered for formulating your advice.
Computation of income or tax liability is not required. v
SOLUTION
The selection of the form of organisation to carry on any business activity is essential in view of
the differential tax rates prescribed under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and specific concessions and
deductions available under the Act in respect of different entities. For the purpose of formulating
advice as to the tax efficient structure of the business, it is necessary for the tax consultant to
consider the following issues:
(i) In the case of sole proprietary concern, interest on capital and remuneration paid to the
proprietor is not allowable as deduction under section 37(1) as the expenditure is of
personal nature. On the other hand, in the case of partnership firm, both interest on capital
and remuneration payable to partners are allowable under section 37(1) subject to the
conditions and limits laid down in section 40(b). The partnership should be evidenced by an
instrument and the individual share of partners should be specified in the instrument.
Remuneration and interest should however, be authorised by the instrument of partnership
and paid in accordance with such instrument. Such interest and salary shall be taxable in
the hands of partners to the extent the same is allowed as deduction in the hands of the
firm under section 40(b). Interest to partners can be allowed upto 12% on simple interest
basis, while the limit for allowability for partners' remuneration is based on book profit under
section 40(b). As per section 40(b)(v), partners’ remuneration shall be allowed to the extent
of aggregate of -
(a) On the first ` 6,00,000 of book profit or in case of loss – ` 3,00,000 or @90% of
book profits, whichever is more
(b) On the balance of book profit – at the rate of 60%
Note
However, if the firm is eligible to declare presumptive taxation under section 44AD, 8% of
gross receipts or 6% of gross receipts, as the case may be, would be deemed as its income.
All deductions under section 30 to 37 are deemed to be allowed. No deduction is allowable,
including deduction for partner’s remuneration and interest on capital.
(ii) Partner's share in the profits of firm is not taxed in the hands of the partners by virtue of
section 10(2A).
(iii) If a proprietary concern is formed, the salary of Mrs. Gavaskar shall be allowed as
deduction under section 37(1).
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.140
avv
(iv) The possibility of invoking section 40A(2) cannot be ruled out as salary is payable to a
relative, who is an interested person within the meaning of section 40A(2). However, it can
be argued successfully that salary of ` 5 lakhs is justified in view of her long experience as
marketing manager of a multinational company and the fair market value of services to be
rendered by her to the concern.
(v) An issue arises as to whether remuneration of Mrs. Gavaskar would be includible in the
total income of Mr. Gavaskar. Under section 64(1)(ii), remuneration of the spouse of an
individual working in a concern in which the individual is having a substantial interest shall
be included in the total income of the individual. However, the clubbing provision does not
apply if the spouse possesses technical or professional qualification and the income is
solely attributable to the application of his or her technical or professional knowledge and
experience. Further, technical or professional qualification would not necessarily mean the
qualifications obtained by degree or diploma of any recognized body [Batta Kalyani vs. CIT
(1985) 154 ITR 0059 (AP)]. The experience of Mrs. Gavaskar as a marketing manager in a
multinational company for 15 years may reasonably be considered as a professional
qualification for this purpose.
(vi) If Mrs. Gavaskar joins the proprietary concern or partnership concern of her husband as
employee, remuneration of ` 5 lakhs shall be taxed in her hands under the head "salary".
Standard deduction u/s 16(ia) of ` 50,000 (under optional tax regime) and ` 75,000 (under
default tax regime) would be allowed.
(vii) lf she joins as partner in the business, remuneration shall be taxed in her hand as business
income under section 28 to the extent such remuneration is allowed in the hands of the firm
under section 40(b).
(viii) For individuals, tax can be computed as per slab rates provided under the default regime
under section 115BAC(1A). Alternatively, he can exercise the option to shift out of the
default tax regime and pay tax under the optional tax regime as per the regular provisions of
the Act at the tax rates prescribed by the Annual Finance Act of that year. However, where
he exercises the option of shifting out of the default regime for any previous year, he would
be able to withdraw such option only once.
The surcharge rate is also depended on the total income and the highest surcharge would
be 37% where total income exceeds ` 5 crores and the assessee has opted to shift out of
the default tax regime whereas under default regime highest rate of surcharge would be
25%. Health and Education cess @ 4% on income-tax plus surcharge, if applicable, is
attracted in all the cases. Whereas for partnership firms’ tax is levied at a flat rate of 30%.
Surcharge @12% would be attracted only if total income exceeds ` 1 crore.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.141
If a sole proprietary concern is formed, Mr. Gavaskar has an option to pay income-tax in
v
respect of his total income (other than income chargeable to tax at special rates under
Chapter XII) as per the default regime under section 115BAC or as per the optional regime
under the normal provisions of Income-tax Act.
Company: For any large venture requiring substantial investment and recourse to borrowed
funds from banks and institutions, ordinarily the form of a limited company will have to be
adopted. Within the company form of organisation, however, several alternatives exist. On
the basis of the ownership and control, a company can either be organised as a widely held
company, i.e. a company in which the public are substantially interested within the meaning
of section 2(18) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Alternatively, it can be organised as a closely
held company. Depending upon the choice of the form of organisation of the company, the
following important tax consequences would have to be considered from the view point of
tax planning:
(i) The provisions of section 79 regarding restrictions on carry forward of losses in the
event of substantial change in the shareholding of the company also become
applicable if the company is one in which the public are not substantially interested.
This aspect would assume particular significance in the case of closely held
companies where losses are made and shareholdings are transferred before such
losses are fully absorbed.
(ii) Also, MAT provisions are applicable to companies. It so happens that in case of
companies enjoying tax holiday benefits still have to pay tax under MAT provisions,
credit of which also cumulated for number of years without being used causing
significant outflow of funds in the initial years.
Thus, it can be seen that the concept of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) and the
provisions of section 79 do not apply to a widely held company.
Place of Effective Management (PoEM) framework is introduced to determine the tax
payable by a foreign company that for all purposes is managed from India and yet does not
pay tax domestically. Many Indian companies that have traditionally used holding
companies and subsidiaries overseas for various reasons are assessing how they may be
affected and are racing to put new structures in place before they come under scrutiny.
These provisions provide for a foreign company to be a resident of India, if the company’s
place of effective management is in India. If a company’s POEM is situated in India; it will
be treated as Indian resident. Its global income will be taxable in India.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.142
avv
Rate of tax: The income-tax rate on foreign companies is higher at 35% plus surcharge
@2% (if total income exceeds ` 1 crore but does not exceed ` 10 crore) and @ 5%, if the
total income exceeds ` 10 crore as against 30%/25%, as the case may be (plus surcharge
@7%, if total income exceeds ` 1 crore but does not exceed ` 10 crore and @12%, if total
income exceeds ` 10 crore) on domestic companies.
Concessional Tax Regimes under section 115BAA and section 115BAB: Section
115BAA provides for concessional rate of tax @22% (plus surcharge@10% and HEC@4%)
for domestic companies, subject to certain conditions, like non-availability of profit-linked
deductions and investment-linked tax deduction under the Act, non-availability of deduction
for contribution to research and development, additional depreciation etc. Domestic
Companies have to exercise the option to be governed by section 115BAA. Once the
company exercises such an option under section 115BAA in a year, it would continue to be
governed by the special provision u/s 115BAA thereafter and cannot opt for regular
provisions in any subsequent year.
Section 115BAB provides for concessional rate of tax @15% (plus surcharge@10% plus
HEC@4%) to manufacturing or electricity generating domestic companies set up and
registered on or after 1.10.2019, and commences manufacturing or generating electricity on
or before 31.3.2024, subject to certain conditions, like non-availability of profit-linked
deductions and investment-linked tax deduction under the Act, non-availability of deduction
for contribution to research and development, additional depreciation etc. The option for
section 115BAB could be exercised by the domestic companies in the very first year in
which the eligible company is set up, failing which it cannot exercise such an option in the
future years. Accordingly, companies who have already opted for concessional tax under
section 115BAB will be governed by the provisions of section 115BAB and a fresh option
cannot be exercised under section 115BAB from A.Y. 2025-26 onwards. The company who
has exercised such an option under section 115BAB, it would continue to be governed by
the special provisions u/s 115BAB thereafter and cannot opt for regular provisions in any
subsequent year.
It may be noted that companies exercising option under section 115BAA or section 115BAB
are not liable to minimum alternate tax under section 115JB.
These two sections, namely sections 115BAA and 115BAB have already discussed earlier
in detail in this chapter.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.143
ILLUSTRATION 16
ABC Ltd., a pharmaceutical company incorporated in the year 2016-17, purchased a new plantv and
machinery for ` 10 lakhs on 01-04-2025. The total income of the company for Assessment Year
2026-27 before allowing additional depreciation in respect of new plant and machinery is ` 20
lakhs. ABC Ltd. has not opted for the concessional tax regime under section 115BAA or 115BA A
so far. Compute the tax liability of ABC Ltd. for A.Y. 2026-27 assuming its turnover for the previous
year 2023-24 was ` 350 crores. Ignore the provisions of MAT.
SOLUTION
Computation of tax liability of ABC Ltd. for A.Y. 2026-27 under regular provisions of the Act
Particulars `
Total Income before allowing additional depreciation 20,00,000
Less: Additional Depreciation u/s section 32(1)(iia)[ `10 lakh x 20%] 2,00,000
Total Income 18,00,000
Applicable Tax Rate (since turnover of P.Y. 2023-24 ≤ ` 400 crores) 25%
4,50,000
Add: Health & Education cess@4% 18,000
Tax Liability 4,68,000
Computation of tax liability of ABC Ltd. for A.Y. 2026-27 under section 115BAA
Particulars `
Total Income before allowing additional depreciation 20,00,000
Less: Additional Depreciation u/s section 32(1)(iia) [Not allowable as -
deduction while computing income u/s 115BAA]
Total Income 20,00,000
Applicable Tax Rate 22%
Tax payable 4,40,000
Add: Surcharge@10% 44,000
4,84,000
Add: Health & Education cess@4% 19,360
Tax Liability 5,03,360
Since tax liability under the regular provisions of the Act is lower than the tax liability under the
provisions of section 115BAA, it would be beneficial for ABC Ltd. not to opt for section 115BAA.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.144
avv
Co-operatives: The co-operative form of business organisation, i.e., a co-operative society
would also be advantageous from the tax angle and, in addition to the general benefits
flowing from the co-operative form the society, can claim deduction in respect of the
reasonable amount of remuneration payable to the members of the society for their services
rendered, including the amount of commission, if any, payable to them and the interest on
the deposits or loans given by them. The co-operative society is entitled to a further tax
benefit arising from section 80P under which the income of a co-operative society is
exempted from tax under different circumstances depending upon the nature of the income
and/or the amount thereof. In addition to the various tax concessions which are available to
all assessees, the co-operative society stands to gain substantially by virtue of the special
benefits available to it under section 80P. The profits of the society remaining after payment
of tax would be distributed by it amongst its members in the form of dividends subject to the
relevant legislation.
However, it may be noted that benefit under section 80P has been withdrawn in respect of
all co-operative banks, other than primary agricultural credit societies (i.e. as defined in Part
V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949) and primary co-operative agricultural and rural
development banks (i.e. societies having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the
principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural
development activities). This is for the purpose of treating co-operative banks at par with
other commercial banks, which do not enjoy similar tax benefits.
Concessional tax regimes under section 115BAD and section 115BAE: Section
115BAD provide that a co-operative society resident in India has the option to pay tax at
22%, subject to fulfilment of certain conditions. Section 115BAE provides an option to a
manufacturing co-operative society set up on or after 01.04.2023, which commences
manufacturing or production on or before 31.03.2024 and does not avail of any specified
incentive or deductions, to opt to pay tax at a concessional rate of 15%. Co-operative
societies who have already opted for concessional tax under section 115BAE will be
governed by the provisions of section 115BAE and a fresh option cannot be exercised
under section 115BAB from A.Y. 2025-26 onwards. In both cases, surcharge would be
levied @10% on such tax.
Sections 115BAE and 115BAD provide for concessional rates of tax and exemption from
Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) in respect of certain resident co-operative societies.
From the above analysis of various forms of the organisation and their treatment for income -tax
purposes, it may be appreciated that the provisions of the taxation laws have a considerable
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.145
influence on the entrepreneurs in their choice of particular form of the organisation that they
should establish. v
(2) Nature of the business : Besides the form of organisation, the choice of the nature of the
business also calls for appropriate planning with reference to the various special benefits available
under the taxation laws to the particular kinds of industries which are not available to other kinds.
Some of these benefits are of such a substantial nature that they constitute one of the major
factors in the determination of the nature of the business.
Broadly, business for this purpose may be divided into two categories - trading and manufacturing
business. There could be a third category involving a combination of both. Deduction is available
under section 10AA to units established in SEZ. Deduction is available to units established in
Special Economic Zones during P.Y. 2020-21 where letter of approval, required to be issued in
accordance with the provisions of the SEZ Act, 2005, has been issued on or before 31 st March,
2020 and the manufacture or production of articles or things or providing services has begun on or
before 31 st March, 2021 or such other date after 31 st March, 2021, as notified by the Central
Government. In such case, the SEZ has deemed to have commenced manufacture or production
in the P.Y.2019-20 and would be eligible for benefit of deduction under section 10AA.
A taxpayer carrying on manufacturing or industrial activities would be in a position to avail of the
various concessions such as depreciation allowance, benefit of amortisation under sections 32,
35ABA, 35ABB, 35D and 35E.
Tax holiday benefit under section 80-IAC would be available in case of eligible start-up, under
section 80-IBA in case of developing and building housing projects and under section 80LA in case
of offshore banking unit and IFSC located in Special Economic Zone.
Section 35AD of the Act also extends investment linked tax deduction to taxpayers with respect to
the capital expenditure incurred for setting up and operation of specified businesses.
While deciding the nature of the business, the benefit of tax exemption or concessional treatment
available in respect of certain types of income such as agricultural income, new industrial
undertakings, ships, business of repairs to ocean going vessels, business of exploration, etc. of
mineral oils, etc. should also be taken into account.
(3) Sources of Funds or Financial Structure : Broadly speaking, the choice in the matter of
financing a new unit or business would be between capital and borrowings. New units being set up
by existing units or companies would have the possibility of using retained profits. In the case of a
company, the means of finance are as follows:
deduction during the previous year in which the assessee commences operation of the specified
business if, such expenditure incurred is capitalized in the books of accounts of the assessee v on
the date of commencement of its operation. However, such deduction is not available in respect of
capital expenditure incurred on acquisition of any land, goodwill or financial instrument. In case the
deduction under this section is claimed, no deduction shall be allowed under Chapter VI -A under
“Deduction in respect of certain incomes” in relation to the specified business for the same or any
other assessment year.
Interest on borrowed capital
Under clause (iii) of section 36(1), deduction of interest is allowed in respect of capital borrowed
for the purposes of business or profession in the computation of income under the head "Profits
and gains of business or profession". As per the proviso to section 36(1)(iii), any amount of
interest paid, in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition of an asset for any period beginning
from the date on which the capital was borrowed for acquisition of the asset till the date on which
such asset was first put to use, shall not be allowed as deduction.
ICDS IX on Borrowing Costs deals with the treatment of borrowing costs. It requires borrowing
costs which are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying
asset to be capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
Qualifying asset has been defined to mean –
land, building, machinery, plant or furniture, being tangible assets;
know‐how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or
commercial rights of similar nature, being intangible assets;
inventories that require a period of twelve months or more to bring them to a saleable
condition.
This ICDS requires capitalization of specific borrowing costs (in respect of funds borrowed
specifically for the purpose of acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset) and
general borrowing costs. In case of qualifying assets being tangible and intangible assets, the
capitalization shall commence from the date on which funds were borrowed and cease when such
asset is first put to use.
This ICDS also provides the formula for capitalization of borrowing costs when funds are borrowed
generally and used for the purpose of acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset.
For this restricted purpose, a qualifying asset shall be such asset that necessarily require a period
of 12 months or more for its acquisition, construction or production. In this case, the capitalization
of borrowing costs shall commence from the date on which funds were utilized.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.148
avv
(5) Setting up and commencement of production : Setting up of business in the context of
the Income-tax Act, 1961 is a concept entirely confined to that Act. It is not the same as the
commencement of the business and these two concepts have been clearly distinguished for
income-tax purpose. Between the date of the setting up and date of commencement, there may be
an interregnum during which the assessee may be incurring expenses of a revenue nature.
Under the taxation laws, the expenditure incurred prior to the date of setting up is not normally
admissible for income-tax purposes. But if those are incurred on and from the date of setting up,
but before commencement of the business, they may be allowed as deduction for tax purposes
provided of course they are revenue in nature and are incurred wholly and exclusively for the
purposes of business.
It is now practically well settled by various judicial rulings that a business is set up as soon as it is
ready to commence production and it is not necessary that actual production should be so
commenced. Thus, in the case of a company established for manufacturing cement, the business
is set up as soon as acquiring of limestone is commenced even if at that time the plant and
machinery may not have been installed so that actual manufacturing operations may commence.
A tax planner should accordingly fix the setting up date in such a manner that the company gets
the maximum scope for allowability of expenses incurred contemporaneously to the date of setting
up remembering that if those are incurred prior to the setting up date those are inadmissible as
direct deductions while, if such expenses are of a revenue nature and they are wholly and
exclusively incurred for business purpose, and are incurred subsequent to the date of setting up,
they will be admissible as normal deductions. The following examples may be noted:
(a) Such expenditure may be allowed as revenue expenditure. Expenditure by way of
brokerage, legal charges, etc. for arranging long term loans, interest on borrowing — India
Cement Ltd. vs. CIT 60 ITR 52 (SC).
(b) Such expenditure may form part of the cost of assets on which depreciation may be
available – Challapalli Sugars Ltd. vs. CIT 98 ITR 167 (SC).
In this context, the provisions of Explanation 8 to Section 43(1) to the effect that any
interest paid or payable in connection with the acquisition of an asset, which is relatable to
any period after such asset is first put to use cannot be capitalised, are relevant.
(c) Such expenditure may constitute preliminary expenditure and may be eligible for
amortisation over a five year period under section 35D.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.149
(d) Such expenditure, if being of a capital nature and if not falling under any of the three
v of
categories noted above may be disallowed and there may not be relief either on account
depreciation or amortisation.
(6) Tax planning for business deductions — Some general considerations : There are
several matters which affect the assessee’s ability to deduct various expenses for income -tax
purposes. Some of the principal considerations to be borne in mind planning for business
deductions, are given below:
Successful tax planning for business deductions pre-supposes a clear and thorough understanding
of the various statutory provisions governing the deductions and an awareness of the statutory
rights as well as various restrictions and conditions governing such rights. The general
considerations applicable to tax planning in the field of business deductions, revolve round their -
(a) allowability.
(b) year of allowability
(c) extent of allowability (disallowing provisions if any), and
(d) carry-forward to future years.
Often, the question of expenditure being capital or revenue and the consequences attaching to the
likely treatment eventually may also be an important part of the tax planning exercise. This aspect
has been discussed at a later stage.
One of the important aspects of tax planning would be to see that the maximum deduction or
allowance is obtained in the earliest possible time for the purpose of determination of taxable
income. Therefore, while deciding about incurring of capital and revenue expenditure, the
assessee should consider the tax treatment of such expenditures and the period within which the
benefit of deduction or amortisation would be obtained so that he can estimate and work out cash
flow position over a period of time. While tax considerations play a major role in investment
decisions, the general principles of financial management and their effect on investment decisions
should not be ignored.
The tax planner should keep in mind the advantage arising out of minimising the expenditure,
especially in the initial years of a business, so that the profits may be maximised and the assessee
may be in a position to avail of the various tax incentives like depreciation as also the tax holiday
provisions.
Normally, deduction for expenditure is allowable in the year in which it is incurred or paid
depending on the method of accounting followed, viz, mercantile or cash. In other words, the
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.150
avv
expenditure to be claimed as deduction should be claimed in the relevant year. Where the
assessee follows the cash system of accounting, the allowance in respect of expenses would be
available only when the moneys in respect of them are actually paid by the assessee. Whereas in
the case of mercantile system of accounting, if a business liability has definitely arisen in the
accounting year, a deduction should be allowed. Where accounts are kept on a mercantile basis, if
an expenditure is claimed on the ground that it is legally deductible, it can be claimed in the year in
which the liability for the expenditure is incurred even though the payment itself is made in a
subsequent year. If an assessee following mercantile system fails to claim an expense in the year
in which it accrues he loses the right to claim it as a deduction altogether. He cannot claim or
make any attempt to reopen the accounts of the earlier year to which the expense relates.
The Supreme Court’s decision in C.I.T. vs. Gemini Cashew Sales Corporation (1967) 65 ITR 643
emphasizes the principle that if the liability to make the payment has arisen during the previous
year, it must be appropriately regarded as the expenditure of that year and merely because the
payment in respect of the expenditure is made in the subsequent year, the assessee would not be
entitled to claim deduction in respect thereof in the subsequent year. As pointed out earlier, this is
subject to the provisions of section 43B.
Normally, deduction can be claimed by the assessee only in respect of those expenses and losses
which have been actually incurred by the assessee during the previous year, i.e. after the business
is set up. However, there are some exceptions to this rule and a tax planner should be aware of
the exceptions and make use of them in appropriate cases. For example, expenditure incurred on
scientific research before the commencement of the business — capital or revenue during the
three years immediately preceding the commencement of the business and coming within the
scope of the Explanation to sections 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(ii), capital expenditure incurred prior to
commencement of specified business allowed as deduction in the year of commencement of
business, in case capitalized under section 35AD, preliminary expenses incurred before
commencement of the business and coming within the scope of section 35D, expenditure on
prospecting for minerals coming within the scope of section 35E, are cases where the assessee
could claim deduction in respect of the expenditure even though the expenditure was not incurred
during the previous year.
Similarly, the expenditure in respect of which deduction is claimed by the assessee should not be
in the nature of capital expenditure. This is again subject to the statutory exceptions contained in
provisions like section 35 and 35AD. Again, subject to the statutory exceptions, the expenditure
should be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.151
Various other expenses incurred prior to the commencement of commercial operations may, in
v
appropriate cases, be accumulated and capitalised by being spread over the cost of various assets
constructed or acquired during the pre-production period. If this is done on a proper basis, the cost
of the various assets including the indirect expenses capitalised can be depreciated for tax
purposes to the extent that the cost relates to assets which are themselves depreciable for
income-tax purposes. This is a matter which the tax planner should bear in mind in order to ensure
that expenses incurred during the construction period are properly accounted and allocated.
Specific deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961
The Income-tax Act, 1961 lists several specific deductions. A deduction falling under each
category is allowable subject to the conditions and limitations, if any which may be specified. At
times the restrictive conditions apply to expenditure which is prima facie suspect as, for example,
transactions with relatives or associates or within the same group coming within the scope of
section 40A(2). While planning for business deductions, due regard must be had to these
limitations.
In addition to the specific provisions the omnibus provision in section 37 also enables an assessee
to claim deduction in respect of expenditure laid out ‘wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the
business’ the tax planner has to take into consideration the principles emerging from the
innumerable relevant judicial rulings while availing of the facility of deduction under this provision.
Any expenditure incidental to business, may be deducted except those prohibited by any provision
of the Act.
Ordinarily, an expenditure which is specifically provided for should be claimed under the relevant
section rather under the omnibus provision. To justify the deduction under the residual clause, all
that is required is that the expenditure must have been incurred wholly and exclusively and it is not
necessary to prove that the expenditure was also incurred ‘necessarily’ or ‘reasonably”. The
expenditure must have been incurred ‘for the purpose of business’. These words are wider than
the phrase “for the purpose of earning profits”. A specific quid pro quo is not essential. It is not
necessary to show that the expenditure resulted in commensurate benefit or advantage either
during the same year or subsequently.
An expenditure is liable to be disallowed if it is either of a personal nature or of a capital nature.
The question whether a particular expenditure is of a personal nature must be judged by reference
to the assessee himself and not any other person.
Capital or Revenue: Generally speaking, an expenditure is regarded as being of a capital nature,
if it results in the acquisition of an asset or of an advantage or benefit of an enduring nature.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.152
avv
The test with regard to the nature of the expenditure-capital or revenue - is to be applied
with reference to its purpose rather than its effect. The test must be applied by reference to
the assessee himself and not any other person. For instance, a company must be obliged to
construct pipelines for the purpose of its business but under conditions whereby the
pipelines ultimately become the property of a municipal corporation rather than the
company itself. In such a case, although the pipelines undoubtedly constitute tangible
assets the expenditure may not be regarded as of a capital nature, since the assets do not
belong to the company but to some other person. There are many judicial rulings to support
this view. A leading case that maybe referred to in this context is Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co.
P. Ltd. vs. CIT (1971) 82 ITR 376 (SC)].
If the purpose of the expenditure is to secure a commercial advantage, rather than
acquisition of a capital asset, it is likely to be allowed as revenue expenditure even though
the advantage may endure for an indefinite period. However, this rule is by no means
inflexible or capable of universal application. Conversely, if the purpose of the expenditure
is the acquisition of an advantage or benefit of an enduring nature the expenditure is liable
to be treated as capital expenditure even if the period or durability of the asset acquired as
the result of the expenditure is very short. For example, if a company making shoes
acquires knives and lasts, whose life is only three years, the expenditure may nevertheless
be regarded as capital expenditure.
In applying the various case laws on the subject of distinction between capital and revenue,
it should be recognised that circumstances do change and the law normally keeps pace
with such changing circumstances. The expenditure that was regarded as capital
expenditure resulting in long-term benefit during the relatively laissez faire days of the 19th
century may not perhaps, be regarded as capital expenditure in the context of the rapid
technological changes which are the feature of industrial life today. The decision of the
Supreme Court in Shahzada Nund & Sons vs. CIT 108 ITR 358 also supports this view. A
tax planner would do well to keep track of the various cases reported from time to time so
as to keep himself informed of the trend of judicial thinking in this regard.
In this context, the requirements spelt out in the various income computation and disclosure
standards have also to be kept in mind while considering the point in time of deductibility of
expenditure.
Expenditure specifically allowed: The Income-tax Act, 1961 specifically allows many types of
expenditure such as depreciation, expenditure on scientific research, expenditure on know-how,
preliminary expenses, bad debts etc. The Act prescribes several conditions and restrictions for
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.153
the allowance of such expenditure. The tax-planner should take care to see that all the
prescribed conditions are complied with so that deductions may not be denied. v
Note - A company who has opted for the special provisions under section 115BAA or
115BAB would, however, not be eligible to claim deduction on account of , inter alia,
additional depreciation and contribution for scientific research to companies/research
association/IITs.
Other business expenses: As already explained earlier, section 37(1) deals with the
various items of expenses which are otherwise not covered by the provisions of Section 30
to 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and specifically provides that all expenses which are
incurred wholly and exclusively (though not necessarily) for the purpose of the business or
profession carried on by the assessee would be deductible in computing the assessee’s
business income. In order to qualify for deduction under this provision, the following
important conditions will have to be fulfilled:
(i) The expenditure should have been incurred by the assessee in the ordinary course
of his business or profession;
(ii) The expenditure should be of a revenue nature and should not be of capital nature;
(iii) The expenditure should not be of a personal nature;
(iv) The expenditure should not be covered by any other provisions of sections 30 to 36
for purposes of allowance and it should not also be covered by any of the provisions
of disallowance contained in sections 40 to 44D; and
(v) The expenditure should not be one which is in the nature of an appropriation of
income or diversion of profits by an overriding title. It should not also be one in
respect of which deduction is permissible under Chapter VI-A of the Income-tax Act,
1961 from the gross total income of the assessee.
Commercial expediency: The concept of ‘commercial expediency’ helps a tax payer in
insisting that a reasonable view is taken of his right to deduct normal expenditure. The trend
in judicial thinking has also recognised this concept. This concept reflects the fact that it is
virtually impossible for the legislation to list all possible deductions to which an assessee
would be entitled in computing his taxable income and therefore the fact that a business
has to be run by the assessee himself under normal commercial conditions must be
recognised in determining the allowability of certain expenditure. The test of commercial
expendiency should be applied from the point of view of a normal prudent businessman, by
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.154
avv
reference to modern concepts of business responsibility and not by reference to the
subjective standards of the revenue department.
A claim on the ground of commercial expediency is subject to the under-noted conditions
and limitations:
(a) If the expenditure is covered by one of the express provisions in the Act, it must
conform to the requirements stipulated therein.
(b) An expenditure which is expressly disallowed under the Act cannot be claimed on
grounds of commercial expediency.
(c) An expenditure cannot be claimed on grounds of commercial expediency if it is improper
or illegal. It may be commercially expedient to pay a bribe or incur a penalty but this does
not mean that the bribe or penalty would be normally deductible for tax purposes.
There is also a distinction between a payment made for a violation or breach of law and
payment made for a breach of contract. Courts have taken the view that where the
payments are not in the nature of penalties for infraction of any law but made in pursuance
of the exercise of an option given in a particular scheme and where the assessee opts for it
out of commercial expediency and business consideration, it could be allowed as deduction.
(7) Tax planning in case of losses : The provisions of sections 70, 71 and 72 of the Income-
tax Act, 1961 regulate the manner in which losses incurred in the business carried on by any tax
payer will have to be dealt with for tax purposes. The consideration to be given by tax payers in
the matter of taking the full benefit of set-off of losses permissible under the law is as important as
the considerations for tax planning which are taken into account in regard to business expenses or
claiming the maximum allowances and deductions particularly in view of the fact that the
provisions of set-off of losses offer valuable scope for planning.
Under section 73, losses incurred in speculation business are to be set off only against the income
from the business of speculation, if any, which the assessee may derive in the same year or in the
subsequent four years. In view of the prohibition in the matter of set -off of losses incurred in
speculation business, it would be in the interest of the assessee to avoid indulging in the business
of speculation if it is likely to result in losses and there is no possibility of setting it off against
future speculation profits within the specified period. Where the business of speculation carried on
by the assessee is not profitable, he could discontinue the business of speculation in the same line
so that the quantum of losses could be reduced and the assessee could resort to speculation in
any other profitable field thereby taking the benefit of exception provided under the law.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.155
The Supreme Court, in CIT vs. Shantilal P. Ltd. (1983) 144 ITR 57, held that a transaction cannot
be described as a ‘speculative transaction’ within the meaning of section 43(5), where therev is a
breach of a contract and on a dispute between the parties, damages are awarded as
compensation by an arbitration award. However, where there is no dispute and damages on a pre -
determined basis are payable under the contract, without actual delivery of the goods contracted
for, the transaction would be a speculative one. If any loss arises out of such a speculative
transaction, such speculation loss would not be available for adjustment against other business
profits, if any.
Loss from specified business referred to in section 35AD can be carried forward indefinitely under
section 73A for set-off against income from the same or any other specified business. Such loss
cannot, however, be set-off against income from non-specified business or income under any other
head.
The assessee should exercise his right to set off of brought forward loss at the first available
opportunity. The Madras High Court, in Tyresoles (India) vs. CIT [1963] 49 ITR 515, held that where
losses sustained are not set off against the profits of the immediately succeeding year or years, they
cannot be set off against profits at a later date. This has been followed by the Punjab and Haryana
High Court in B.C.S. Kartar Chit Fund and Finance Co. (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT [1989] 79 CTR (P & H) 232.
Hence, as a matter of proper tax planning, the assessee should exercise the right under section 72 in
the immediately succeeding year/years when the profits allow such a set off.
It is also significant to note that, under section 79, a closely held company will be entitled to claim
the benefit of carry forward and set-off of losses, only if shares carrying at least 51% of the voting
power is held on the last day of the previous year by the same persons who held such shares on
the last day of the previous year in which the loss was incurred. In case of a closely held company,
being an eligible start up referred to in section 80-IAC, the loss incurred in any year prior to the
previous year (say, in P.Y.2021-22) can be carried forward for set-off against the income of the
relevant previous year (i.e., P.Y.2025-26), if shares carrying at least 51% of the voting power is
held on the last day of the previous year (i.e., as on 31.3.2026) by the same persons who held
such shares on the last day of the previous year in which the loss was incurred (i.e., as on
31.3.2022). In the alternative, all shareholders of such company holding shares carrying voting
power on the last day of the previous year in which the loss was incurred (i.e., as on 31.3. 2022),
should continue to hold those shares on the last day of the previous year in which the loss is to be
set-off (i.e., as on 31.3.2026) and such loss should have been incurred during the ten years
beginning from the date of incorporation of such company. This benefit will not be denied, if the
change has occurred on account of death of a shareholder or on account of transfer by a
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.156
avv
shareholder to his relative by way of a gift. This benefit will also not be denied if the change in
shareholding of an Indian company, which is a subsidiary of a foreign company, is the result of an
amalgamation or demerger. However, this is subject to the condition that 51% shareholders of the
amalgamating or demerged foreign company continue to be the shareholders of the amalgamated
or resulting foreign company. Further, the benefit of carry forward and set -off would not be denied
to accompany, where a change in the shareholding takes place in a previous year pursuant to a
resolution plan approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after affording a
reasonable opportunity of being heard to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or
Commissioner.
It should be kept in mind that section 79 applies to carry forward and set off of losses and not to
the benefit of deduction in respect of unabsorbed depreciation.
Loss Returns: In the context of discussion on losses it would be relevant to point out that the tax
planner would do well to keep in mind the implications of the provisions of section 139(3) read with
section 80.
If an assessee is to get the benefit of the determination of the loss and its carry forward under
section 72(1) or 73(2) or 73A(2) or 74(1) or 74A(3), he should file a return voluntarily within the
period specified in section 139(1).
However, filing of return within the period specified in section 139(1) is not necessary for carry
forward of loss from house property under section 71B and unabsorbed depreciation.
Section 80AC stipulates compulsory filing of return of income on or before the due date specified
under section 139(1) as a pre-condition for availing benefit of deductions under any provision of
Chapter VI-A under the heading "C.-Deductions in respect of certain incomes".
Section 115B provides for a concessional rate of tax for taxing the profits and gains derived from
the business of life insurance. Under these provisions, in the case of an assessee whose total
income includes any profits and gains derived from the business of life insurance computed in
accordance with the First Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, the income-tax payable shall be
the aggregate of –
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.157
(i) the amount of income-tax calculated on the income from life insurance business included
in total income at the rate of 12½% and v
(ii) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had the
total income of the assessee been reduced by the amount of profits and gains from the life
insurance business.
Income accruing or arising to a company from life insurance business referred to in section 115B
would not be subject to MAT. [Section 115JB(5A)].
Taxation of income/loss of non-life insurance business: Rule 5 of the First Schedule to the
Income-tax Act, 1961 provides that the profits and gains of non-life insurance business would be
the profit before tax and appropriations as disclosed in the profit and loss account prepared in
accordance with the provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 or the IRDA Act, 1999, subject to
following adjustment -
- expenditure or allowances not allowable under sections 30 to 43B,
- any provision for diminution in the value of investment debited to profit and loss account
has to be added back,
- any gain or loss on realization of investments not credited or debited to profit and loss
account, shall be added or deducted, as the case may be, and
Tax on income from GDRs purchased in foreign currency or capital gains arising
from transfer of such GDRs [Section 115ACA]
(i) Eligible assessee [Section 115ACA(1)(a)/(b)]-This section applies to resident
individuals who are employees of an Indian company engaged in specified
knowledge based industry or service, or employee of its subsidiary engaged in
specified knowledge based industry or service.
(ii) Eligible income and special rate of tax [Section 115ACA(1)(a)/(b)] - Where the
total income includes the following income namely –
(a) income by way of dividends in respect of Global Depository Receipts of an
Indian company engaged in specified knowledge based industry or service,
purchased by an eligible assessee in foreign currency issued in accordance
with such employees’ stock option scheme as the Central Government may
specify in this behalf,
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.158
avv
(b) income by way of long-term capital gains arising from the transfer of the
aforesaid Global Depository Receipts,
Then, the aforesaid income will be taxed at the following rates:
• at the rate of 10% in respect of income by way of interest or dividend
referred to in (a) above; and
• at the rate of 12.5% in respect of long-term capital gain from the transfer of
above bonds or GDRs.
(iii) No deduction is allowed [Section 115ACA(2)]- In the case of the aforesaid
resident employee, no deduction shall be allowed under any provisions of this Act,
where the gross total income consists only of income by way of dividend from Global
Depository Receipts.
However, where the gross total income includes dividend income or long term capital
gain from such Global Depository Receipts, the deduction under any provisions of
the Act shall be allowed only on that portion of gross total income which does not
include such income from the Global Depository Receipts.
(iv) No benefit of first and second proviso of section 48 [Section 115ACA(3)]- The
first and second provisos to section 48 relating to the computation of capital gains
shall not apply in case of transfer of Global Depository Receipts of an Indian
company purchased by the resident employee in foreign currency. In other words, no
indexation will be available even if the assets are long term capital assets.
(v) Meaning of certain terms:
S. Term Meaning
No.
1. Global Any instrument in the form of a depository receipt or
Depository certificate (by whatever name called) created by the
Receipts Overseas Depository Bank outside India or in an
International Financial Services Centre and issued to
investors against the issue of –
(i) ordinary shares of issuing company, being a
company listed on a recognized stock exchange in
India; or
(ii) foreign currency convertible bonds of issuing
company;
(iii) ordinary shares of issuing company, being a
company incorporated outside India, if such
depository receipt or certificate is listed and traded
on any International Financial Services Centre
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.159
(i) Carbon credits is an incentive given to an industrial undertaking for reduction of the
emission of GHGs (Green House gases).
(ii) A reduction in emissions entitles the entity to a credit in the form of a Certified Emission
Reduction (CER) certificate. The CER is tradable and its holder can transfer it to an entity
which needs Carbon Credits to overcome an unfavourable position on carbon credits.
(iii) To bring clarity on the issue of taxation of income from transfer of carbon credits and to
encourage measures to protect the environment, section 115BBG provides that where the
total income of the assessee includes any income from transfer of carbon credit, such
income shall be taxed at a concessional rate of 10% (plus applicable surcharge and cess)
(iv) No expenditure is allowed - No expenditure or allowance in respect of such income shall
be allowed under the Act.
(v) Meaning of "Carbon credits": Carbon credits in respect of one unit shall mean reduction of
one ton of carbon dioxide emissions or emissions of its equivalent gases which is validated
by the United Nations Framework on Climate Change and which can be traded in market at
its prevailing market price.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.162
avv
SIGNIFICANT SELECT CASES
[Link]. Case Law
1. Secunderabad Club v. CIT [2023] 457 ITR 263 (SC)
Issue Facts, Analysis and Decision
Does the principle of mutuality Facts of the case: The assessee-club
apply to interest income derived deposited surplus funds as term deposits with
from fixed deposits made with the various banks (who were the club members). It
banks by the clubs if such banks claimed interest earned on said deposits as
are members of the club? exempt from income-tax applying the principle
of mutuality.
Analysis: The principle of mutuality works on
the triple test, namely-
(i) Complete identity between the
contributors and participators;
(ii) Action of the participators and
contributors must be in furtherance of the
mandate of the associations or the Clubs. The
mandate of the Club is a question of fact that
has to be determined from the Memorandum or
Articles of Association, Rules of Membership,
Rules of the Organization, etc., and must be
construed broadly.
(iii) There must be no scope for profiteering
by the contributors from a fund made by them,
which could only be expended or returned to
themselves.
Applying the above principles to the facts of
the case, it was observed that in relation to
transactions, namely, the deposit of surplus
funds earned by the club, in banks which are
members of the club, the principle of mutuality
applies till the stage of deposit of funds and
would lose its application, once the funds are
deposited as fixed deposit in the banks. This is
because the funds would be exposed to
commercial banking operations, which means
that the deposits could be used for lending to
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.163
the State Government, would the land was acquired by the State Government and
resultant capital gain be assessed compensation was paid for it. In this case,vthe
in the status of “Association of property in question came to the assessees’
Persons” (AOP) or in their individual possession through inheritance i.e., by operation
status? of law. It is not a case where any ‘association of
persons” was formed by volition of the three
brothers. Further, even the income earned in the
form of interest is not because of any business
venture of the three assessees, but is the result of
the act of the Government in compulsorily
acquiring the said land. Thus, the basic test to be
satisfied for making an assessment in the status of
AOP is absent in this case. Hence, the income
from asset inherited by the legal heirs is taxable in
their individual hands and not in the status of AOP.
4. Joint CIT v. Rolta India Ltd. (2011) 330 ITR 470 (SC)
Issue Analysis and Decision
Can interest u/s 234B and 234C be Section 115JB(5) provides that all other
levied where a company is provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shall
assessed on the basis of book apply to every assessee, being a company,
profits u/s 115JB? mentioned in that section. Section 115JB is a
self-contained code pertaining to MAT, and by
virtue of sub-section (5) thereof, the liability for
payment of advance tax would be attracted.
Therefore, if a company defaults in payment of
advance tax in respect of tax payable u/s
115JB, it would be liable to pay interest under
sections 234B and 234C.
5. Madras Gymkhana Club v. DCIT (2010) 328 ITR 348 (Mad.)
Issue Analysis and Decision
Would the interest earned on The assessee-club providing facilities like gym,
surplus funds of a club deposited library, etc., to its members earned interest
with institutional members satisfy from fixed deposits which it had made by
the principle of mutuality to escape investment of its surplus funds with its
taxability? corporate members.
Interest earned from investment of surplus
funds in the form of fixed deposits with
institutional members does not satisfy the
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.166
avv
principle of mutuality and hence cannot be
claimed as exempt on this ground. The interest
earned is, therefore, taxable.
6. Sind Co-operative Housing Society v. ITO (2009) 317 ITR 47 (Bom)
Issue Analysis and Decision
Can transfer fees received by a co- Transfer fees received by a co-operative
operative housing society from its housing society, whether from outgoing or from
incoming and outgoing members be incoming members, is not liable to tax on the
exempt on the ground of principle of ground of principle of mutuality since the
mutuality? predominant activity of such co-operative
society is maintenance of property of the
society and there is no taint of commerciality,
trade or business.
Further, section 28(iii), which provides that
income derived by a trade, professional or
similar association from specific services
performed for its members shall be treated as
business income, can have no application
since the co-operative housing society is not a
trade or professional association.
7. CIT v. Anil Hardware Store (2010) 323 ITR 368 (HP)
Issue Analysis and Decision
In a case where the partnership The manner of fixing the remuneration of the
deed does not specify the partners has been specified in the partnership
remuneration payable to each deed. In a given year, the partners may decide
individual working partner but lays to invest certain amounts of the profits into
down the manner of fixing the other ventures and receive less remuneration
remuneration, would the assessee- than that which is permissible under the
firm be entitled to deduction in partnership deed, but there is nothing which
respect of remuneration paid to debars them from claiming the maximum
partners? amount of remuneration payable in terms of
the partnership deed. The method of
remuneration having been laid down; the
assessee-firm is entitled to deduct the
remuneration paid to the partners u/s 40(b)(v)
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.167
8. CIT v. Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd (2016) 385 ITR 637 (SC)
v
Issue Analysis and Decision
Can income derived by an Indian The requirement of producing a certificate
shipping company from slot would not apply when entire ship is not
charter arrangement in other ships chartered and the arrangement pertains only to
be computed applying the special purchase of slots, slot charter etc. The legal
provisions under Chapter XII-G of fiction created by section 115VG(4) is to be
the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating given proper meaning.
to Tonnage Tax Scheme, in spite Accordingly, income from slot charter
of non-fulfillment of the condition arrangement in other ships can be computed
of holding a valid certificate in applying the special provisions under Chapter
respect of such ships indicating its XII-G.
net tonnage in force?
Note: As per section 115VG(4), for the
purposes of Chapter XII-G, the tonnage shall
mean the tonnage of a ship or inland vessel,
as the case may be, indicated in the certificate
referred to in section 115VX and includes the
deemed tonnage computed in the prescribed
manner. The manner has been prescribed in
Rule 11Q of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Further, the Explanation to section 115VG(4)
provides that for the purposes of this sub-
section, 'deemed tonnage' shall be the
tonnage in respect of an arrangement of
purchase of slots, slot charter and an
arrangement of sharing of break-bulk vessel.
Rules 11Q(1) provides that for the purpose of
Explanation to section 115VG(4), deemed
tonnage in respect of an arrangement of
purchase of slots and slot charter shall be
computed on the following basis:
2.5 TEU = 1 Net Tonnage (1NT)
Where TEU is Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit
(Container of this size)
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.168
avv
9. CIT v. Metal and Chromium Plater (P) Ltd. [2019] 415 ITR 123 (Mad)
Issue Analysis and Decision
Should capital gains exempt under Capital gains which forms part of the net profit
section 54EC, which forms part of in the statement of profit and loss of the
the net profit in the statement of assessee-company, in respect of which
profit and loss of the assessee- exemption under section 54EC is available
company, be taken into account for while computing total income under the regular
calculation of tax on book profits as provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should
per section 115JB? not be taken into account for calculation of
minimum alternate tax on book profits under
section 115JB.
Note – The following is an extract of Circular
No.13/2001 dated 9.11.2001, issued by the
CBDT at the time of insertion of section 115JB
in the Income-tax Act, 1961 -
“It may be emphasised that the new provision
of section 115JB is a self-contained code. Sub-
section (1) lays down the manner in which
income-tax payable is to be computed. Sub-
section (2) provides for computation of "book
profit". Sub-section (5) specifies that save as
otherwise provided in this section, all other
provisions of this Act shall apply to every
assessee, being a company mentioned in that
section. In other words, except for substitution
of tax payable under the provision and the
manner of computation of book profit, all the
provisions of the tax including the provision
relating to charge, definitions, recoveries,
payment, assessment, etc., would apply in
respect of the provisions of this section.”
The CBDT Circular clarifies that except for
substitution of tax payable under the provision
and manner of computation of book profit, all
other provisions relating to charge, definitions,
recoveries, payment, assessment, etc., would
apply in respect of section 115JB. Therefore,
“book profit” for levy of MAT has to be
computed in the manner laid down under
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.169
Questions
1. XYZ Ltd. is engaged in the manufacture of textile since 01-04-2009. Its Statement of Profit
& Loss shows a profit of ` 700 lakhs after debit/credit of the following items:
(a) Depreciation calculated on the basis of useful life of assets as per provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013 is ` 50 lakhs.
(b) Employer's contribution to EPF of ` 2 lakhs and Employees' contribution of ` 2 lakhs
for the month of March 2026 were remitted on 30th June, 2026.
(c) The company appended a note to its Income Statement that industrial power tariff
concession of ` 2.5 lakhs was received from the State Government and credited the
same to Statement of P & L.
(d) The company had provided an amount of ` 25 lakhs, being sum estimated as
payable to workers based on agreement to be entered with the workers union
towards periodical wage revision once in 3 years. The provision is based on a fair
estimation of wages and reasonable certainty of revision once in 3 years.
(e) The company had made a provision of 10% of its debtors towards bad and doubtful
debts. Total sundry debtors of the company as on 31-03-2026 was ` 200 lakhs.
(f) A debtor who owed the company an amount of ` 40 lakhs was declared insolvent
and hence, was written off by debit to Statement of Profit and loss.
(g) Sundry creditors include an amount of ` 50 lakhs payable to A & Co, towards supply
of raw materials, which remained unpaid due to quality issues. An agreement has
been made on 31-03-2026, to settle the amount at a discount of 75% of the
outstanding. The amount waived is credited to Statement of Profit and Loss.
(h) The opening and closing stock for the year were ` 200 lakhs and ` 255 lakhs,
respectively. They were overvalued by 10%.
(i) Provision for gratuity based on actuarial valuation was ` 500 lakhs. Actual gratuity
paid debited to gratuity provision account was ` 300 lakhs.
(j) Commission of ` 1 lakhs paid to a recovery agent for realization of a debt. Tax has
been deducted and remitted as per Chapter XVIIB of the Act.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.171
(k) The company has purchased 500 tons of industrial paper as packing material at a
v
price of ` 30,000/ton from PQR, a firm in which majority of the directors are partners.
PQR's normal selling price in the market for the same material is ` 28,000/ton.
Additional Information:
(i) There was an addition to Plant & Machinery amounting to ` 50 lakhs on 10-06-2025,
which was used for more than 180 days during the year. Additional depreciation has
not been adjusted in the books.
(ii) Normal depreciation calculated as per Income-tax Rules, 1962 is ` 80 lakhs.
(iv) The company has collected ` 7 lakhs as GST from its customers and paid the same
on the due dates. However, on an appeal made, the High Court directed the
Department to refund ` 3 lakhs to the company. The company, in turn, refunded ` 2
lakhs to the customers from whom the amount was collected and the balance of ` 1
lakh is still lying under the head “Current Liabilities”.
Compute total income and tax liability for A.Y. 2026-27. Ignore MAT provisions and the
provisions of section 115BAA.
Note - The turnover of XYZ Ltd. for the P.Y.2023-24 was ` 405 crore.
2. Parik Hospitality Limited is engaged in the business of running hotels of 3 -star category.
The company's Statement of Profit and Loss for the previous year ended 31 st March 2026
shows a profit of ` 152 lakhs after debiting or crediting the following items:
(a) Payment of ` 0.25 lakh and ` 0.30 lakh in cash on 3 rd December 2025 and 10th
December 2025, respectively, for purchase of raw corn to Mr. Raja, an agriculturist,
and Mr. Khalid, a spice trader for purchase of masala used for corn products,
respectively.
(d) Balance of statement of profit and loss shown in balance sheet at the asset side as
at 31.3.2025 was ` 30 lakhs which includes unabsorbed depreciation of ` 10 lakhs.
Compute the book profit under section 115JB for the year ended 31.3.2026.
5. Mr. Harish, aged 66, running business as a proprietor furnishes the particulars of his
income for the year ended 31.03.2026 as under:
(a) Net Profit of ` 3,65,500 from the wholesale business of textiles and fabrics arrived at
after charge of following expenses in the Profit & Loss Account:
(i) Personal travelling expenses of ` 12,750.
(ii) Purchase of furniture for shop on 13.6.2025 of ` 25,000 but charged in shop
expenses.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.175
(b) He owns a house with two floors constructed with the financial assistance of HDFC,
out of which ground floor is used by him for self-use and first floor was let out onv rent
for ` 8,500 p.m. from April 2025. The municipal tax paid for the whole house was of
` 2,500 and interest paid on housing loan for the construction was ` 52,000. Both the
floors of the house are identical.
(c) He deposited insurance premium on the life of self of ` 12,500, wife ` 13,500, son
and daughter of ` 28,000, repaid housing loan of ` 50,000 and paid ` 55,000 by
credit card for health insurance of himself and his family.
Compute the total income and the amount of tax liability of Mr. Harsh on such income for
the Assessment Year 2026-27 assuming that he has exercised the option to shift out of the
default tax regime under section 115BAC.
6. PQR LLP, a limited liability partnership set up a unit in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in the
financial year 2019-20 for production of washing machines. The unit fulfills all the conditions
of section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. During the financial year 2024-25, it has also
set up a warehousing facility in a district of Tamil Nadu for storage of agricultural produce. It
fulfills all the conditions of section 35AD. Capital expenditure in respect of warehouse
amounted to ` 75 lakhs (including cost of land ` 10 lakhs). The warehouse became
operational with effect from 1 st April 2025 and the expenditure of ` 75 lakhs was capitalized
in the books on that date.
Relevant details for the financial year 2025-26 are as follows:
Particulars `
Profit of unit located in SEZ 40,00,000
Export sales of above unit received in India in convertible foreign 80,00,000
exchange on or before 30.9.2026
Domestic sales of above unit 20,00,000
Profit from operation of warehousing facility (before considering 1,05,00,000
deduction under Section 35AD).
Compute income tax (including AMT under Section 115JC) liability of PQR LLP for
Assessment Year 2026-27.
7. Victory Polyfibres, a partnership firm, has earned a gross total income of ` 300 lakhs for the
year ended 31-3-2026. The firm has not undertaken any international transaction or
specified domestic transaction during the said year.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.176
avv
The above income includes a profit of ` 220 lakhs from an undertaking having a turnover of
` 80 crores. This is the fifth year and deduction under section 80-IA is available to the
extent of ` 200 lakhs.
There are some grey areas in the taxation workings and hence, the assessee is contemplating
to file the return of income on 7-12-2026, after seeking clarifications from tax experts.
Advise the assessee-firm by working out the total income and tax payable, where the return
is filed on 31-10-2026 or when the same is filed on 7-12-2026.
What is the practical solution as regards obtaining clarifications, which might or might not
have an impact on the total income? You may ignore interest under section 234A, 234B,
234C and 234F while making the computation in support of your advice.
8. T and Q are individuals, aged 28 years and 30 years respectively, who constitute an
Association of Persons, sharing profit and losses in the ratio of 2:1. For the accounting year
ended 31st March 2026, the Profit and Loss account of the business is as under:
Figures are in ` ‘000s
Cost of goods sold 4,250 Sales 4,900
Remuneration to: Dividend from Indian companies 25
T 130 Long term capital gains (computed) 640
Q 170
Employees 256
Interest to:
T 48.3
Q 35.7
Other expenses 111.7
GST penalty due 39
Net profit 524.3
5,565 5,565
(e) Loss ` 17 lakhs, due to destruction of a machine worth ` 24 lakhs by fire due to
short circuit and ` 3 lakh received as scrap value. The insurance company did not
admit the claim of the company on charge of gross negligence.
(f) Provision for gratuity based on actuarial valuation was ` 320 lakhs. Actual gratuity
paid debited to gratuity provision account was ` 160 lakhs.
(g) Advertisement charges ` 2.30 lakhs, paid by cheque for advertisement published in
the souvenir of a political party registered with the Election Commission of India.
(h) Long term capital gain ` 3 lakhs on sale of equity shares on 12.4.2025 on which
Securities Transaction Tax (STT) was paid at the time of acquisition and sale.
Additional Information:
(i) Normal depreciation computed as per Income-tax Rules is ` 71 lakhs (after giving
effect to the scrap value).
(ii) GST ` 8 lakhs collected from its customers was paid by the company on the due
dates. On an appeal, the High Court directed the GST department to refund ` 3
lakhs to the company. The company in turn refunded ` 2 lakhs to the customers from
whom it was collected and the balance ` 1 lakh is still lying under the head "Current
Liabilities".
Compute the total income of Lambda Ltd. for the A.Y. 2026-27 by analyzing and applying
the relevant provisions of income-tax law. Briefly explain the reasons for treatment of each
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.179
item. Ignore the provisions relating to Minimum Alternate Tax. Assume that the company
has not opted for section 115BAA. v
12. X, Y and HUF of Z (represented by Z) are partners with equal shares in profits and losses of
a firm, M/s Popular Cine Vision, which is engaged in the production of TV serials and
telefilms.
The earlier partnership deed did not authorise payment of remuneration or interest to
partners. The partnership deed was revised by the partners on 1 st June 2025 to authorise
payment of remuneration of ` 1 lakh per month to each working partner and simple interest
at 15% per annum on partners’ capital. X, Y and Z are actively associated with the affairs of
the firm.
The Profit & Loss Account of the firm for the year ended 31st March 2026 shows a net profit
of ` 10 lakhs after debiting/crediting the following:
(a) Interest amounting to ` 5 lakhs each was paid to partners on the balances standing
to their capital accounts from 1 stJune, 2025 to 31st March 2026.
(b) Remuneration to the partners including partner in representative capacity ` 30 lakhs.
(c) Interest amounting to ` 2 lakhs paid to Z on loan provided by him in his individual
capacity at 16% interest.
(d) Royalty of ` 5 lakhs paid to partner X, who is a professional script writer, for use of
his scripts as per agreement between the firm and X. The same is authorized by
partnership deed.
(e) Two separate payments of ` 18,000 and ` 15,000 made in cash on 1 st February,
2026 to Altaf, a hairdresser, against his bill for services rendered in January, 2026
and two payments of ` 19,000 and ` 10,000 made in cash on 1 st February and 2nd
February, 2026, respectively, to Priyam, an assistant cameraman, against her bill for
services provided in January, 2026.
(f) Amount of ` 5 lakhs provided in the books on 31 st March 2026 as liability for
remuneration to Shreya, a film artist and a non-resident. Tax deducted at source
under section 195 from the amount so credited was paid on 3 rd June 2026.
(g) Amount of ` 6 lakhs provided as gratuity for the year on the basis of actuarial
valuation. Gratuity actually paid to one retired employee during the year is ` 1.50
lakhs.
(h) Interest of ` 1.20 lakhs received on income-tax refund under section 244(1A) in
respect of A.Y. 2025-26.
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.180
avv
Compute the total income of the firm for the assessment year 2026-27 stating the reasons
for treatment of each item.
13. The following are the particulars relating to two Indian companies, namely, Alpha Ltd. and
Beta Ltd., which are subject to tax audit u/s 44AB, for A.Y.2026-27 –
Particulars Alpha Ltd. Beta Ltd.
Date of setting up/ registration 1.4.2020 1.3.2024
Main object Manufacture of steel Manufacture of leather
Place Vaishali, Bihar Ranipet, Tamil Nadu
Turnover of P.Y. 2023-24 ` 251 crores -
Turnover of P.Y. 2024-25 ` 401 crores -
Turnover of P.Y. 2025-26 ` 270 crores ` 120 crores
Value of new plant and machinery ` 8 crore ` 5 crore
installed and put to use on 1.11.2025
Gross Total Income of P.Y.2025-26 ` 5 crore ` 5 crore
No. of new employees employed on 50 750
the date of setting up/registration of
the company
No. of new employees employed as on 750 -
1.4.2023
Monthly emoluments to 750
employees employed in the respective
companies as mentioned above, by
ECS through bank account:
250 employees ` 20,000 per ` 21,000 per employee
employee
250 employees ` 25,000 per ` 25,000 per employee
employee
250 employees ` 28,000 per ` 27,000 per employee
employee
(i) Compute the tax liability of Alpha Ltd. and Beta Ltd. for A.Y.2026-27. Alpha Ltd.
has not opted for any concessional rates earlier and want to avail the beneficial tax
rates under the special provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the P.Y. 2025-26.
Beta Ltd. has already opted for the concessional tax rates under section 115BAB
and wants to continue the same in P.Y. 2025-26. Assume that the gross total
income reflects the computation under the special provisions.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.181
(ii) Would it be beneficial for Alpha Ltd. to opt for beneficial tax rates in P.Y. 2025-26
instead of paying tax under regular provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961? v
Examine.
Answers
1. Computation of Total Income of XYZ Ltd. for the A.Y.2026-27
Particulars Amount (`)
Profits and Gains from Business and Profession
Profit as per Statement of profit and loss 7,00,00,000
Add: Items debited but to be considered separately or
to be disallowed
(a) Depreciation as per Companies Act, 2013 50,00,000
(b) Employees’ contribution to EPF 2,00,000
[Since employees’ contribution to EPF has not been
deposited on or before the due date under the PF Act,
the same is not allowable as deduction as per
Explanation 2 below to section 36(1)(va). Since the
same has been debited to Statement of profit and loss, it
has to be added back for computing business income].
(b) Employer’s contribution to EPF Nil
[As per section 43B, employers’ contribution to EPF
is allowable as deduction since the same has been
deposited on or before the due date of filing of return
under section 139(1). Since the same has been
debited to Statement of profit and loss, no further
adjustment is necessary]
(d) Provision for wages payable to workers Nil
[The provision is based on fair estimate of wages and
reasonable certainty of revision, the provision is
allowable as deduction, since ICDS X requires
‘reasonable certainty for recognition of a provision,
which is present in this case. As the provision has been
debited to Statement of profit and loss, no adjustment
is required while computing business income]
(e) Provision for doubtful debts [10% of ` 200 lakhs] 20,00,000
[Provision for doubtful debts is allowable as
deduction under section 36(1)(viia) only in case of
banks, public financial institutions, state financial
corporations, state industrial investment corporations
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.182
avv
and non-banking financial corporations. Such provision
is not allowable as deduction in the case of a
manufacturing company. Since the same has been
debited to Statement of profit and loss, it has to be
added back for computing business income]
(f) Bad debts written off Nil
[Bad debts write off in the books of account is
allowable as deduction under section 36(1)(vii). Since
the same has already been debited to Statement of
profit and loss, no further adjustment is required]
(i) Provision for gratuity 2,00,00,000
[Provision of ` 500 lakhs for gratuity based on
actuarial valuation is not allowable as deduction as
per section 40A(7). However, actual gratuity of `
300 lakhs paid is allowable as deduction. Hence, the
difference has to be added back]
(j) Commission paid to recovery agent for realization Nil
of a debt.
[Commission of ` 1 lakh paid to a recovery agent for
realisation of a debt is an allowable expense under
section 37 as per DCIT v. Super Tannery (India) Ltd.
(2005) 274 ITR 338 (All). Since the same has been
debited to Statement of profit and loss, and tax has been
deducted at source, no further adjustment is required]
(k) Purchase of paper at a price higher than the fair 10,00,000
market value
[As per section 40A(2), the difference between the
purchase price (` 30,000 per ton) and the fair
market value (` 28,000 per ton) multiplied by the
quantity purchased (500 tons) has to be added back
since the purchase is from a related party, a firm in
which majority of the directors are partners, at a
price higher than the fair market value]
AI(vi) GST not refunded to customers out of GST refund 1,00,000 2,83,00,000
[The amount of GST refunded to the company by the
Government is a revenue receipt chargeable to tax
under section 41(1). Deduction can be claimed of
amount refunded to customers [CIT v. Thirumalaiswamy
Naidu & Sons (1998) 230 ITR 534 (SC)]. Hence, the net
amount of ` 1,00,000 (i.e., ` 3,00,000 minus ` 2,00,000)
would be chargeable to tax]
9,83,00,000
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.183
Capital Gains
Long term capital gain on sale of equity shares on which
securities transaction tax was paid at the time of acquisition 3,60,000
and sale
In case of a company, it has been provided that where income-tax payable on total income
computed as per the provisions of the Act is less than 15% of book profit, the book profit
shall be deemed as the total income and the tax payable on such total income shall be 15%
thereof plus health and education cess @4%.
Accordingly, in this case, since income-tax payable on total income computed as per the
provisions of the Act is less than 15% of book profit, the book profit of ` 11,65,000 is
deemed to be the total income and income-tax is payable @ 15% thereof plus health and
education cess @4%. The tax liability, therefore, works out to be `1,81,740.
Computation of tax credit
Particulars `
Tax on book profit under section 115JB 1,81,740
Less: Tax on total income computed as per the other provisions of the 1,25,710
Act
Tax credit to be carried forward under section 115JAA [Can be 56,030
carried forward for 15 assessment years succeeding A.Y. 2026-27]
4. Computation of book profit of XYZ Ltd. for the year ended 31.3.2026
Particulars ` `
Profit as per Statement of Profit & Loss 1,90,00,000
Add: Net profit to be increased by the following
amounts as per Explanation 1 below section
115JB(2)
Depreciation on assets debited to Statement of P& L 1,00,00,000
Reserve for currency exchange fluctuation, since the
amount carried to any reserve, by whatever name
called, is to be added back 50,00,000
Provision for tax (See Note below) 40,00,000
Proposed dividend 1,20,00,000 3,10,00,000
5,00,00,000
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.190
avv
Less: Net profit to be decreased by the following
amounts as per Explanation 1 below section
115JB(2)
Depreciation other than depreciation on revaluation of 60,00,000
assets (` 100 lakhs - ` 40 lakhs)
Withdrawal from revaluation reserve restricted to the 40,00,000
extent of depreciation on account of revaluation of
assets (` 50 lakhs or ` 40 lakhs, whichever is less)
Unabsorbed depreciation or brought forward business
loss, whichever is less, as per the books of account.
Unabsorbed depreciation ` 10 lakhs and brought
forward business loss ` 20 lakhs – whichever is less 10,00,000 1,10,00,000
Book profit 3,90,00,000
Note – For the purpose of section 115JB, book profit means the profit as per the statement
of profit and loss prepared in accordance with Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, as
adjusted by certain additions/deductions as specified. One of the adjustments is to add
back income-tax paid or payable, and the provisions therefor. Explanation 2 after sub-
section (2) of section 115JB clarifies that income-tax includes, inter alia, interest on income-
tax. Therefore, the entire provision of ` 40 lakhs for income-tax is added back for computing
book profit for levy of minimum alternate tax.
5. Computation of total income and tax payable by Mr. Harish for the A.Y. 2026-27 under
the normal provisions of the Act
Particulars ` `
Income from house property
Self-occupied portion (50%)
Annual Value under section 23(2) Nil
Less: Deduction under section 24(b)
Interest on housing loan [` 52,000 × 50%] 26,000 (26,000)
Let-out portion (50%)
Income of let out portion being rent of ` 8,500 p.m. received
for 12 months1
Gross Annual Value under section 23(1) (` 8,500 × 12) 1,02,000
1 Rent received has been taken as the GAV in the absence of other information.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.191
Computation of adjusted total income of PQR LLP for levy of Alternate Minimum Tax
Particulars ` `
Total Income (as computed above) 64,00,000
Add: Deduction under section 10AA 16,00,000
80,00,000
Add: Deduction under section 35AD 65,00,000
Less: Depreciation under section 32
On building @10% of ` 65 lakhs2 6,50,000 58,50,000
Adjusted Total Income 1,38,50,000
Alternate Minimum Tax @18.5% 25,62,250
Add: Surcharge@12% (since adjusted total income > ` 1 3,07,470
crore)
28,69,720
Add: Health and Education cess@4% 1,14,789
29,84,509
Tax liability under section 115JC (rounded off) 29,84,510
Since the regular income-tax liability is less than the alternate minimum tax liability, the
adjusted total income shall be deemed to be the total income and tax is leviable @18.5% v
thereof plus surcharge @ 12% and cess @4%. Therefore, the tax liability is ` 29,84,510.
AMT Credit to be carried forward under section 115JD
`
Tax liability under section 115JC 29,84,510
Less: Tax liability under the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 19,96,800
9,87,710
Notes:
(1) Deduction @100% of the capital expenditure is available under section 35AD for
A.Y.2026-27 in respect of specified business of setting up and operating a
warehousing facility for storage of agricultural produce which commences operation
on or after 01.04.2009.
Further, the expenditure incurred, wholly and exclusively, for the purposes of such
specified business, shall be allowed as deduction during the previous year in which it
commences operations of specified business if the expenditure is incurred prior to
the commencement of its operations and the amount is capitalized in the books of
account of the assessee on the date of commencement of its operations.
Deduction under section 35AD would, however, not be available on expenditure
incurred on acquisition of land.
In this case, since the capital expenditure of ` 65 lakhs (i.e., ` 75 lakhs – ` 10 lakhs,
being expenditure on acquisition of land) has been incurred in the F.Y. 2024-25 and
capitalized in the books of account on 1.4.2025, being the date when the warehouse
became operational, ` 65,00,000, being 100% of ` 65 lakhs would qualify for
deduction under section 35AD.
(2) Deduction under section 10AA in respect of Unit in SEZ =
Export turnover of the Unit in SEZ
Profit of the Unit in SEZ× Total turnover of the Unit in SEZ x 50%
` 80,00,000 x 50 % = ` 16,00,000
` 40,00,000 ×
` 1,00,00,000
7. As per section 80AC, while computing the total income of an assessee of a previous year
(P.Y.2025-26, in this case) relevant to any assessment year (A.Y.2026-27, in this case),
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.194
avv
any deduction is admissible, inter alia, under section 80-IA, such deduction shall not be
allowed unless it furnishes a return of income for such assessment year on or before the
‘due date’ specified in section 139(1).
Since the turnover of the partnership firm has exceeded the prescribed threshold limit in the
previous year 2025-26, it would be subject to audit under section 44AB, in which case the
‘due date’ of filing its return of income for A.Y.2026-27 would be 31st October, 2026 as per
section 139(1).
Computation of total income and tax liability of M/s. Victory Polyfibres for A.Y. 2026-27
Since the regular income-tax payable by the firm is less than the alternate
minimum tax payable, the adjusted total income shall be deemed to be the tota l
income of the firm for P.Y.2025-26 and it shall be liable to pay income-tax on such
total income @ 18.5% [Section 115JC(1)]. Therefore, the tax payable for the A.Y.
2026-27 would be ` 64.65 lakhs.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.195
II. Where the firm files its return of income on 7 th December 2026:
Where the firm files its return on 7-12-2026, it would be a belated return under
section 139(4). Consequently, as per section 80AC, deduction under 80-IA would
not be available. In such circumstances, the gross total income of ` 300 lakhs
would be the total income of the firm.
Particulars ` in lakhs
Income-tax @ 30% of ` 300 lakhs 90.000
Add: Surcharge @12% (since total income exceeds ` 1 crore) 10.800
Income-tax (plus surcharge) 100.800
Add: Health and Education cess @ 4% 4.032
Total tax liability 104.832
Particulars `
Notes:
1. Since the employer’s contribution to PF has been paid during the previous
year itself, it is allowable as deduction.
2. Penalty imposed for delay in filing GST return is not deductible since it is on
account of infraction of the law requiring filing of the return within the specified
period. – CIT v. Ratanchand Bholanath (S.S) (1986) 160 ITR 500 (M.P.)
(ii) Tax implication in the hands of members T & Q for the A.Y. 2026-27
Members of the AOPs have to pay tax on their total income taking into account
savings/ investments etc.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.197
Since one of the members has total income excluding share from AOP more than the
v
basic exemption limit, the AOPs will be chargeable to tax at the maximum marginal rate.
Since the AOPs is taxed at maximum marginal rate, the share income of members is
not taxable in their hands individually as per section 86.
9. Transfer fees received by a co-operative housing society, whether from outgoing or from incoming
members, is not liable to tax on the ground of principle of mutuality where the predominant activity
of such co-operative society is maintenance of property of the society. It was so held by the
Bombay High Court in Sind Co-op Housing Society v. ITO (2009) 317 ITR 47.
Further, section 28(iii), which provides that income derived by a trade, professional or
similar association from specific services performed for its members shall be treated as
business income, can have no application since the co-operative housing society is not a
trade or professional association.
Therefore, ` 6 lakhs received as transfer fees by Pandey Co-operative Housing Society
from its transferor members and its transferees, is not chargeable to tax.
10. Computation of total income and tax liability of M/s. Beta & Co., a partnership firm, as
per the normal provisions of the Act for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars `
(in lakhs)
Business income (before deduction under section 10AA)
SEZ Unit 50.00
Add: Amount debited to SEZ Re-investment Reserve 20.00
70.00
DTA Unit 40.00
Gross Total Income 110.00
Less: Deduction u/s 10AA
= ` 70 lakhs × ` 150 lakhs/` 210 lakhs = 50 × 50% (being the 25.00
13th year)
Amount credited to SEZ Re-investment Reserve Account 20.00
whichever is less is deductible 20.00
Total Income 90.00
Tax on total income@30% 27.00
Add: Health and Education Cess@4% 1.08
Tax liability (as per normal provisions) 28.08
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.198
avv
Computation of Adjusted total income and Alternate Minimum tax of M/s. Beta & Co.,
a partnership firm, as per the provisions of section 115JC for A.Y.2026-27
Since the tax liability as per the normal provisions of the Act is more than the alternate
minimum tax payable, the total income as per normal provisions shall be liable to tax and
the tax payable for A.Y. 2026-27 shall be ` 28.08 lakhs.
11. Computation of Total Income of Lambda Ltd. for the A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars Amount (`)
I Profits and gains of business and profession
Net profit as per the statement of profit and loss 7,50,00,000
Add: Items debited but to be considered
separately or items of expenditure to be
disallowed
(a) Depreciation as per Companies Act 52,00,000
(c) Provision for wages payable to workers -
[Since the provision is based on a fair
estimate of wages payable with reasonable
certainty, the provision is allowable as
deduction. ICDS X requires a reliable
estimate of the amount of obligation and
‘reasonable certainty’ for recognition of a
provision, which is present in this case.
As the provision of ` 18 lakhs has been
debited to statement of profit and loss, no
adjustment is required while computing
business income]
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.199
3CIT v. Thirumalaiswamy Naidu & Sons (1998) 230 ITR 534 (SC)
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.200
avv
Less: Items credited to statement of profit and
loss, but not includible in business income/
permissible expenditure and allowances
(b) Industrial power tariff concession received -
from State Government
[Any assistance in the form of, inter alia,
concession received from the Central or State
Government would be treated as income. Since
the same has been credited to statement of
profit and loss, no adjustment is required]
(d) Dividend received from US company 12,00,000
[Dividend received from foreign company is
taxable under “Income from other sources”.
Since the same has been credited to the
statement of profit and loss, it has to be
deducted while computing business income]
(e) Scrap value of machinery 3,00,000
[Scrap value of machinery, being capital in
nature, has to be reduced from WDV of
machinery. Since the same has been credited
to the statement of profit and loss, it has to be
deducted while computing business income]
(h) Long term capital gains on sale of equity 3,00,000
shares
[The taxability or otherwise of long-term
capital gain on sale of equity shares has to
be considered while computing income
under the head “Capital Gains”. Since such
capital gains has been credited to statement
of profit and loss, the same has to be
reduced to arrive at the business income.]
AI(i) Depreciation as per Income-tax Rules, 1961 71,00,000 89,00,000
Profits and gains from business and profession 8,93,30,000
II Capital Gains
Long term capital gain on sale of equity shares 3,00,000
[Long term capital gains in excess of ` 1.25
lakhs (i.e., ` 1.75 lakhs, being ` 3 lakh – ` 1.25
lakhs) on sale of equity shares on which STT is
paid at the time of acquisition and sale would be
taxable@12.5% u/s 112A, without indexation
benefit.]
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.201
12. Computation of Total Income of M/s. Popular Cine Vision for the A.Y.2026-27
Particulars ` `
Profits and Gains from Business or Profession
Net Profit as per Profit & Loss A/c 10,00,000
Add: Expenses disallowed or considered separately:
Interest to partners in excess of 12% (Note 1) 3,00,000
Disallowance under section 40A(3) for aggregate cash
payment exceeding ` 10,000 in a single day (Note 5) 52,000
Provision for gratuity (Note 7) 4,50,000
Partners’ Remuneration 30,00,000
Royalty paid to Partner X (Note 4) 5,00,000 43,02,000
53,02,000
Less: Interest on income-tax refund (Note 8) 1,20,000
Book Profit 51,82,000
Less: Partners’ remuneration allowable under section
40(b)(v)
(i) As per limit prescribed in section 40(b)
On first ` 6,00,000 90% 5,40,000
On the balance ` 45,82,000 60% 27,49,200
32,89,200
avv DIRECT TAX LAWS
9.202
avv
(ii) Remuneration actually paid or payable
(` 1,00,000 × 10 months × 3 partners) +
(Royalty ` 5 lakhs)
(i) or (ii) whichever is less, is deductible 35,00,000 32,89,200
18,92,800
Income from other sources
Interest on income-tax refund 1,20,000
Gross Total Income 21,02,800
Deductions under Chapter VI-A Nil
Total Income 21,02,800
Notes:
1. As per section 40(b), simple interest at 12% p.a. to partners relating to the period
after the date of partnership deed is allowable. Excess interest @ 3% paid from 1 st
June 2025 to 31st March 2026 is to be disallowed. Excess interest of 3% being
`15,00,000 x 3/15 = ` 3,00,000.
2. Even though Z is a partner in a representative capacity, he is still a partner.
Therefore, remuneration to Z should also be subject to the limits prescribed in
section 40(b). This view finds support from the decision of the Supreme Court in the
case of Rashik Lal & Co. vs CIT (1998) 229 ITR 458 (SC).
3. As per Explanation 1 to section 40(b), where an individual is a partner in a firm in
representative capacity, the provisions of section 40(b) shall not apply to any interest
payable by the firm to such individual in his personal capacity. Z represents his HUF
in the firm. However, Z gave the loan in his individual capacity. Hence, assuming that
the provisions of section 40A(2) do not get attracted in this case, such interest shall
be allowed as deduction in full even though the interest rate is more than 12% p.a.
4. It may be noted that the limits specified under section 40(b)(v) are applicable in case
of payment of salary, bonus, commission, or remuneration, by whatever name called,
to a working partner. From a plain reading of the section, it is clear that any
remuneration, by whatever name called, paid to a working partner, is subject to the
limits laid down in section 40(b)(v). Therefore, the royalty of ` 5 lakhs paid to partner
X would also be subject to the limits laid down in section 40(b)(v). Hence, the same
has to be added back for computing book profits.
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.203
Notes -
(1) Alpha Ltd. is eligible to opt for special provisions under section 115BAA, as
per which the rate of tax would be 22% plus surcharge@10% and HEC@4%.
(2) Both Alpha Ltd. and Beta Ltd. are eligible to claim deduction u/s 80JJAA,
which is a permissible Chapter VI-A deduction while computing total income
under section 115BAA and 115BAB.
In case of Alpha Ltd, 30% of the additional employee cost of new employees
employed in the P.Y. 2023-24, can be claimed as deduction u/s 80JJAA for
P.Y.2025-26. Out of 750 employees, 250 employees whose emoluments are
` 20,000 p.m., 250 employees whose emoluments are ` 25,000 p.m. qualify
as additional employees and 250 employees whose emoluments exceed
` 25,000 p.m. do not qualify as additional employees.
Similarly, in case of Beta Ltd, 30% of the additional employee cost of new
employees employed in the P.Y. 2023-24, can be claimed as deduction u/s
80JJAA for P.Y.2025-26. Out of 750 employees, 250 employees whose
emoluments are ` 21,000 p.m., 250 employees whose emoluments are
` 25,000 p.m. qualify as additional employees and 250 employees whose
emoluments exceed ` 25,000 p.m. do not qualify as additional employees.
(ii) Computation of tax liability of Alpha Ltd. as per the regular provisions of the Act
Particulars Alpha Ltd.
`
Gross Total Income (computed under the special provisions) 5,00,00,000
Less: Additional Depreciation [10% of ` 8 crore, since the plant
and machinery has been put to use for less than 180 days in 80,00,000
the P.Y.2025-26]
ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS ENTITIES 9.205
Since the tax liability under the regular provisions of the Act is ` 3,90,000 vis-à-vis
tax liability of ` 23,90,960 computed under section 115BAA, it is not beneficial for
Alpha Ltd. to opt for the special provisions under section 115BAA for A.Y.202 6-27.
Hence, Alpha Ltd. should not opt for the special provisions under section 115BAA for
A.Y.2026-27.
CHAPTER a
10
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you would be able to -
❑ identify the inclusions in the definition of “charitable purpose”, to appreciate whether a trust or
institution would qualify for the benefit of exemption under sections 11 and 12;
❑ appreciate the conditions to be fulfilled by a trust or institution to claim benefit of exemption under
section 11 or under section 10(23C);
❑ appreciate the procedure to be followed for approval/registration of a trust or institution;
❑ analyse the special provision under section 13, which specifies scenarios when a trust or
institution shall not be eligible to claim exemption under section 11 or section 12
❑ examine the special provisions relating to taxability of anonymous donations received by a trust
or institution;
❑ examine the special provision relating to taxability of certain specified income of a trust or
institution under section 115BBI
❑ appreciate the special provisions for taxability of accreted income of certain trusts and institutions;
❑ identify the income of political parties which are exempt from tax and the conditions to be satisfied
to avail the exemption;
❑ examine the conditions to be satisfied by an electoral trust to avail exemption in respect of
voluntary contributions received by it;
❑ examine the special provisions relating to taxation of business trusts, securitisation trusts
and investment fund and compute the tax liability in the hands of such trusts/fund and the
unit holders/investors.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Taxation
Special Taxation
Regime of
Provisions Regime of Taxation of
Charitable/ Taxation of
relating to Securiti- Investment
Religious Business
Taxation of Political sation trust funds and
trusts Trusts and
Discretion- Parties & and its unit
[First unitholders
ary Trusts Electoral investors holders
Regime [Section
Trusts [Section [Section
and 115UA]
[Sections 115TA to 115UB]
Second
13A & 13B] 115TCA]
Regime]
10.1 INTRODUCTION
Non-profit organisations in India cater to socio-economic and other needs of common people in the
country. Hence, the Government encourages such organisations with philanthropic objective by
providing tax exemptions subject to compliance of certain conditions. In this chapter, we will be
discussing the income tax exemptions and related aspects of trusts and institutions engaged in
charitable activities, political parties, electoral trusts and other special entities such as securitization
trusts, business trusts and investment funds.
Chapter III of the Income-tax Act,1961, which covers incomes that are exempt from tax, also contains
the provisions pertaining to exemption in respect of charitable trusts and institutions, political parties,
electoral trusts and exemptions in respect of income of special entities like securitization trusts,
business trusts and investment fund.
A) Charitable or religious trusts/institutions can avail income-tax exemption under two different
independent regimes.
• The first regime pertains to the exemption available under section 10(23C), which inter
alia exempts income received by any person on behalf of university, or other
educational institution or any hospital.
• The second regime pertains to the exemption under section 11 that provides for
exemption in respect of income derived from property held under trust wholly for
charitable or religious purposes.
Therefore, a trust or institution can choose to opt for an exemption either under the first
regime i.e., under section 10(23C) or the second regime i.e., under section 11, as it deems
appropriate depending on its objects and activity.
It is noteworthy that the broad features and conditions for availing exemption under both
regimes are largely similar. The Finance Act, 2022 made significant amendments to ensure
harmonization and consistency in the exemption provisions under both the regimes. Prior to
these amendments, there were inconsistencies and gaps in both regimes, wherein certain
conditions stipulated for availing exemption under section 11 were absent in section 10(23C).
Therefore, the Finance Act 2022 has rationalised the same by ensuring that there is a level
playing field between the two alternate regimes.
Exemption provisions in respect of charitable or religious trusts
University or other educational institution, hospital or Trust for charitable or religious
other medical institution, other fund or institution for purposes
charitable purposes, any trust or institution wholly for [Sections 11 to 13 – Second
public religious purposes or wholly for religious and Regime]
charitable purposes [Section 10(23C) – First Regime]
Note: Since both the regimes offer almost similar benefits and the procedural aspects or
conditions for availing benefits are largely aligned, amendments have been made by the
Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 for discontinuation of approval under the First Regime [i.e. under
sub-clauses (iv), (v), (vi) and (via) of section 10(23C)]. Accordingly, application for approval
or renewal of approval under First Regime cannot be made on or after 1 st October 2024.
Consequently, with effect from 1 st October 2024, trusts or institutions desirous of availing
exemption shall make an application for registration under the Second Regime only.
It is important to note that, the trust which were approved or made application for
approval before 1 st October 2024 and got approval, thereafter, are eligible to claim
exemption under first regime till the validity of such approval.
B) Political Party and Electoral Trust
Section 13A exempts certain categories of income derived by a political party and section
13B exempts voluntary contributions received by electoral trusts.
C) Securitisation Trust, Business Trust and Investment Fund
The Income-tax Act, 1961 provides pass-through status to certain entities such as
Securitisation Trusts, Business Trusts and Investment Fund in respect of certain incomes.
Such incomes are taxable in the hands of unitholders/investors. Exemption provisions in
respect of certain incomes in the hands of these entities and unitholders are contained in
Chapter III of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Further, the Income-tax Act, 1961 also contains
special provisions relating to Securitization trust, Business Trusts and Investment Fund under
Chapter XII-EA, XII-FA and XII-FB, respectively.
General Discussion on Trusts
Non-Profit Organisations intending to carry on charitable or religious activities are normally set up
either as a trust or a society or a company registered under section 8.
Trust is the most common and preferred legal form. Therefore, before considering the income -tax
exemption provisions governed under section 10(23C) or section 11 to 13, let us see briefly what
exactly the term trust signifies, the types of trusts and the manner of their creation. Though this
aspect of the topic does not strictly fall within the purview of income-tax, such a general knowledge
would be useful in understanding the provisions of tax laws relating to charitable trusts.
Author of the trust • the person who reposes or declares the confidence
Beneficial interest or
• is his right against the trustees or owner of the trust property
interest of the beneficiary
Trusts can be broadly classified into two groups - Public and Private.
Types of Trusts
Specific Discretionary
The distinction between a public and private trust is that, whereas in the former, the beneficiaries
are the general public or a class thereof, in the latter they are specific persons. While in the former,
the beneficiaries constitute a body which is incapable of ascertainment, in the latter they are persons
who are ascertained or capable of being ascertained. Generally private trusts are formed for the
convenience of individuals and families. The private trust does not enjoy any tax exemption .
Private trusts are governed by the Indian Trust Act, 1882. This Act does not apply to the following:
(i) The rules of Mohammedan law as to waqf;
(ii) The mutual relations of the members of undivided family as determined by any customary or
personal law;
(iii) Public or private religious or charitable endowments; and
(iv) Trust to distribute prizes taken in war among the captors.
On the other hand, Public trusts are constituted mainly for the benefit of the public at large. There
are three requirements for creation of a public trust.
There are three requirements for creation of a public trust. They are
(i) a declaration of trust which is binding on the settlor,
(ii) setting apart definite property and depriving himself of the ownership, and
(iii) a statement of objects for which the property is thereafter to be held. In the case of a private
trust also, more or less similar requirements exist.
Public trust enjoys tax exemption under the Income-tax Act subject to compliance of certain
conditions, that are discussed in detail in this chapter.
Broadly, exemption of any income received by any person on behalf of universities, educational
institutions, hospitals and other medical institutions under section 10(23C) is available in the
following manner:
• any university or other educational institution existing solely for educational purposes
and not for profit and its aggregate annual receipts do not exceed ` 5 crore
[Sub-clause (iiiad)].
• any hospital or other institution for the reception and treatment of persons suffering
from illness or mental defectiveness or for the reception and treatment of convalescing
persons or persons requiring medical attention or rehabilitation, existing solely for
philanthropic purposes and not for profit, if its aggregate annual receipts do not
exceed the prescribed limit of ` 5 crore [Sub-clause (iiiae)].
• Where a person has receipts from an institution specified in sub-clause (iiiad) as well
as from an institution specified in sub-clause (iiiae), whose combined receipts
exceeds ` 5 crores, then, the said person shall not be eligible for exemption
under the respective sub-clauses (iiiad) & (iiiae).
Note - The conditions and norms for availing the exemption under section 10(23C)(iv), (v), (vi) &
(via) [First regime] are largely similar as those for availing exemption under section 11 to 13 [Second
Regime]. Henceforth, in this chapter, reference to First regime would refer to section
10(23)(iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via). The comparative table of the corresponding provisions under the First and
Second regime are given under para 10.3, which will help students co-relate the relevant provisions
under the First regime with the provisions of sections 11 to 13 under the Second Regime discussed
later on in this Chapter.
ILLUSTRATION 1
An educational institution having annual receipts of ` 3.80 crore during the P.Y. 2025-26, has availed
exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Assessing Officer has denied the exemption on the
grounds that the educational institution has not made any application to the prescribed authority for
approval under the said section 10(23C)(iiiad). Examine the action of the Assessing Officer in
denying the exemption.
SOLUTION
As per section 10(23C)(iiiad), income of any university or other educational institution existing solely
for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit would be exempt if the aggregate annual
receipts of such university or educational institution do not exceed ` 5 crores. Therefore, the
exemption available under this section can be availed without making any application to the
prescribed authority.
Therefore, the action of the Assessing Officer in denying the exemption to the educational institution
is not correct.
ILLUSTRATION 2
A not for profit trust undertakes philanthropic activities through an educational institution and a
hospital. During the P.Y. 2025-26, the trust had annual receipts of ` 3 crores from its educational
institution and ` 4 crore from the hospital. During the P.Y. 2025-26, it desires to avail exemption
under section 10(23C)(iiiad) and 10(23C)(iiiae), as the individual threshold under each of the sub -
clauses, is less than ` 5 crores. Can it do so? Examine.
SOLUTION
As per Explanation to section 10(23C)(iiiae), it has been clarified that the limit of annual receipts of
` 5 crore is qua ‘taxpayer’ and not qua ‘activity’. Therefore, if the aggregate annual receipts from
educational activity and medical activity exceeds ` 5 crores, then, exemption under sub-clause (iiiad)
and (iiiae) cannot be availed by the trust.
Since, in the present case, the aggregate annual receipt of ` 7 crores (` 3 crores of educational
institution and ` 4 crores from hospital) exceeds the threshold of ` 5 crores, exemption under section
10(23C)(iiiad) and (iiiae) cannot be availed, even though the individual receipts from educational
institution and hospital have not exceeded ` 5 crores.
Overview
- trust for charitable or religious purposes, created before 1.4.1952, to the extent
to which such income is applied for such purposes outside India.
In both the cases, the CBDT should have, by general or special order, directed that
such income shall not be included in the total income of the person in receipt of such
income.
(d) Income in the form of voluntary contributions made with a specific direction that they
shall form part of the corpus of the trust or institution.
Such voluntary contributions received as corpus must be invested or deposited in one
or more of the forms or modes specified in section 11(5) maintained specifically for
such corpus, for claim of exemption.
II. Voluntary Contributions [Section 12]- Any voluntary contribution received by a trust
created wholly for charitable or religious purposes or by an institution established wholly for
such purposes shall, for the purposes of section 11, be deemed to be income derived from
property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes. However, corpus
donations (i.e., contributions made with a specific direction that they shall from part of the
corpus of the trust or institution) shall not be treated as income, provided they are invested
in the modes specified under section 11(5) [Section 12(1)].
The value of any services, being medical or educational services, made available by any
charitable or religious trust running a hospital or medical institution or an educational
institution, to any person referred under section 13(3), would be deemed to be income of
such trust or institution derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious
purposes during the previous year in which such services are so provided and shall be
chargeable to income-tax.
III. Income should be applied for charitable or religious purposes - One of the primary
objectives of providing exemption under section 11 is that the income of the NPO should be
applied wholly towards charitable or religious purpose. The income -tax act has not defined
the term religious purpose. The shorter Oxford English Dictionary defines the term as follows:
“Devoted to religion; exhibiting the spiritual or practical effects of religion, following the
requirements of religion; pious, godly, devout”.
However, with regards to the definition of the term ‘Charitable Purpose’ , section 2(15) states
that ‘charitable purpose’ includes-
• relief of the poor,
• education,
• yoga,
• medical relief,
• preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife) & preservation
of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest and
• the advancement of any other object of general public utility.
Advancement of any other object of general public utility: The definition of “charitable purpose”
includes “any other object of general public utility” The question arises as to what is an object
of “general public utility”. This expression has not been defined anywhere in the Act.
In CIT v. Gujarat Maritime Board (2007) 295 ITR 561, the Supreme Court observed that the
Gujarat Maritime Board was established for the predominant purpose of development of minor
ports within the State of Gujarat, the management and control of the Board was essentially
with the State Government and there was no profit motive. The assessee, Gujarat Maritime
Board, was under a legal obligation to apply its income which was directly and substantially
from the business held under trust for the development of minor ports in Gujarat. Therefore,
the Supreme Court held that the assessee was entitled to be registered as “charitable trust”
under section 12A.
A number of entities functioning on commercial basis claim exemption of their income either
under section 10(23C) or section 11 on the foundation that they are charitable institutions.
This is based on the contention that they are engaged in the “advancem ent of an object of
general public utility” as is included in the fourth part of the present definition of “charitable
purpose”. There were many decisions rendered in the past supporting the view that if
unconnected business is held under a trust for promoting the object of general public utility
and if profits are used for promoting such objects, income thereof shall be exempt, for
example, the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Madras Stock Exchange Ltd. (1981)
130 ITR 184. However, such a claim in respect of an activity carried out on commercial basis,
goes against the basic intention of the provision.
“Advancement of any other object of general public utility” would not be a charitable
purpose: In order to limit the ambit of the phrase “advancement of any other object of general
public utility”, section 2(15) provides that “the advancement of any other object of general
public utility” would not be a charitable purpose if it involves the carrying on of –
(a) any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business or,
(b) any activity of rendering of any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business,
for a fee or cess or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application of
the income from such activity, or the retention of such income, by the concerned entity.
Thus, the “advancement of any other object of general public utility” shall not be a charitable
purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or
business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to a ny trade, commerce or
business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or
application, or retention, of the income from such activity, unless,-
(1) such activity is undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement
of any other object of general public utility; and
(2) the aggregate receipts from such activity or activities, during the previous year, does
not exceed 20% of the total receipts, of the trust or institution undertaking such
activity or activities, for the previous year.
Therefore, in effect, “advancement of any other object of general public utility” would continue
to be a “charitable purpose”, if the activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business is
undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object o f
general public utility and the aggregate receipts from any activity in the nature of trade,
commerce or business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade,
commerce or business does not exceed 20% of the total receipts of the trust or institution
undertaking such activity or activities, for the previous year.
ILLUSTRATION 3
An institution having its main object as “advancement of general public utility” received
` 30 lakhs in aggregate during the P.Y.2025-26 from an activity in the nature of trade. The
total receipts of the institution, including donations, was ` 140 lakhs. It applied 85% of its
total receipts from such activity during the same year for its main object i.e., advancement of
object of general public utility.
(i) What would be the tax consequence of such receipt and application thereof by the
institution?
(ii) Would your answer be different if the institution’s total receipts had been ` 150 lakhs
(instead of ` 140 lakhs) in aggregate during the P.Y.2025-26?
(iii) What would be your answer if the main object of the institution is “relief of the poor”
and the institution receives ` 30 lakhs from a trading activity, when its total receipts
are ` 140 lakhs and applies 85% of the said receipts for its main object?
SOLUTION
(i) As the main object of the institution is “advancement of object of general public utility”,
the institution will lose its “charitable” status for the P.Y.2025-26, since it has received
` 30 lakhs from an activity in the nature of trade, which exceeds ` 28 lakhs, being
20% of the total receipts of the institution undertaking that activity for the previous
year. The application of 85% of such receipt for its main object during the year would
not help in retaining its “charitable” status for that year. The institution will lose its
charitable status and consequently, the benefit of exemption of income for the
P.Y.2025-26, irrespective of the fact that its approval is not withdrawn or its registration
is not cancelled.
(ii) If the total receipt of the institution is ` 150 lakhs, and the institution receives ` 30
lakhs in aggregate from an activity in the nature of trade during the P.Y.2025-26, then
it will not lose its “charitable” status since receipt of upto 20% of the total receipts of
the institution in a year from such activity is permissible. The institution can claim
exemption subject to fulfilment of other conditions under sections 11 to 13. Further,
such activity should also be undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such
advancement of any other object of general public utility.
(iii) The restriction regarding carrying on a trading activity for a cess, fee or other
consideration will not apply if the main object of the institution is “relief of the poor”.
Therefore, receipt of ` 30 lakhs from a trading activity by such an institution will not
affect its “charitable” status, even if it exceeds 20% of the total receipts of the
institution. The institution can claim exemption subject to fulfilment of other conditions
under sections 11 to 13.
ILLUSTRATION 4
“Save Wild Life” an institution having its main object as ‘preservation of wildlife’, used the
entire income derived from an activity in the nature of trade for its main object during the
previous year ended on 31.03.2026. Would such utilization of its income be treated as
utilisation for “charitable purpose”? Examine. Would your answer be different, if the main
object of the institution is “advancement of object of general public utility”?
SOLUTION
Section 2(15) defines “charitable purpose” to include relief of the poor, education, yoga,
medical relief, preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and
preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic i nterest and the
advancement of any other object of general public utility. However, the “advancement of any
other object of general public utility” shall not be a charitable purpose, if the institution is
carrying on any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of
rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any
other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or retention, of the income
derived from such activity.
object of general public utility”. Such institution would continue to retain its “charitable” status,
even if it derives income from an activity in the nature of trade.
However, if an institution having its main object as “advancement of any other object of
general public utility”, derives income from an activity in the nature of trade during a financial
year, it would lose its “charitable” status for that year, even if it applies such income for its
main objects.
It may be noted that if the receipts from such activity does not exceed 20% of the total receipts
in that year, then, the institution would not lose its “charitable” status, even if its main object is
“advancement of any other object of general public utility”, if such activity is undertaken in the
course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object of general public utility.
The proviso to section 2(15) will apply only to entities whose purpose is advancement of any
other object of general public utility i.e., the last limb of the definition of charitable purpose
contained in section 2(15). Hence, such entities will not be eligible for exemption under
section 11 or under section 10(23C), if they carry on commercial activities. Whether such an
entity is carrying on an activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business is a question of
fact which will be decided based on the nature, scope, extent and frequency of the activity.
There are industry and trade associations who claim exemption from tax under section 11 on
the ground that their objects are for charitable purpose as these are covered under any other
object of general public utility. Under the principle of mutuality, if trading takes place between
persons who are associated together and contribute to a common fund for the financing of
some venture or object and in this respect have no dealings or relations with any outside
body, then any surplus returned to the persons forming such association is not chargeable to
tax. In such cases, there must be complete identity between the contributors and the
participants.
Therefore, where industry or trade associations claim to be both charitable institutions as well
as mutual organizations and their activities are restricted to contributions from and
participation of only their members, these would not fall within the purview of the proviso to
section 2(15) owing to the principle of mutuality. However, if such organizations have dealings
A trust will be treated as a charitable trust under section 2(15) even if its object involves the
carrying on of an activity for profit. Such a trust will not be denied exemption under section
11 on the ground that its objects are non-charitable.
IV. Charitable trust engaged in business activity- Section 11(4A) provides that the exemption
under the respective regime, would be available in respect of income, being profits and gains
from business activity if ––
(a) such business is incidental to the attainment of the objects of the trust/institution; and
(b) separate books of account are maintained by such trust/institution in respect of such
business.
Cases where trust property consists of a business undertaking -Section 11(4) clarifies
that for the purposes of section 11, property held under trust may consist of a business
undertaking so held. If that be so, the trustees may claim that the income of such undertaking
enjoys exemption under section 11. Section 11(4) provides that -
(a) The Assessing Officer shall have the power to determine the income of the undertaking
in accordance with the provisions of the Act relating to assessment, and
(b) Where the income determined by the Assessing Officer is in excess of that shown in
the books of the undertaking, such excess shall be deemed to be applied to purposes
other than charitable or religious purposes.
exemption application. This process was time consuming and also paved way for prolonged
litigation.
Some of the key aspects of change in the registration procedure is that the registration
process is made online and the approvals are valid only for a certain time period. Closure to
the expiry of the validity period, the taxpayer must apply for renewing the registration. Failure
to renew the exemption approval will not entitle the taxpayer to avail the exemption any
further. The procedure for registration under the second regime i.e. under section 12AB in
below Table:
Table : Procedure & Timelines for availing exemption under section 12AB
read with section 12A(1)(ac) 1
Section Case Time limit for Time limit for Validity Period Registration
12A(1)(ac) making the passing order granted is
application by the PC/C applicable
[Section from
12AB(3)]
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Clause (i) Re-registration Within three Order to be Five years A.Y. from
of the months from passed within 3 [Section which
institutions or April 1, 20212 in months from 12AB(1)(a)/(b)] registration
funds which Form No. 10A end of the Where the total was earlier
were already month when income of a granted
registered application was trust or [Proviso to
under section made. institution section
12A/section without giving 12A(2)]
12AA. prior to effect to the
1.4.2021 provisions of
Clause (ii) Renewal of at least six within 6 months section 11 and A.Y.
registration/ months prior to from the end of 12 does not immediately
approval for the expiry of the quarter in exceed ` 5 following the
trust/ the five-year which crores during F.Y. in which
institution validity in Form application was each of the two application is
already No. 10AB. received after P.Y’s, made [Section
registered satisfying preceding the 12A(2)]
under section himself about P.Y. in which
12AB or the application is
1 For detailed study of procedure, manner and form applicable for making application for registration or
provisional registration, students are advised to refer Rule 17A of the Income -tax Rules, 1962 available at
[Link]
2 As per the provision, the effective date for making application is 30.06.2021. However, this date is extended
Clause (vi) In any other At least one Within one Three years the A.Y. for
case (for e.g., month prior to month from the [Section which
first time the commence- end of the 12AB(1)(c)] registration is
applications) ment of the month in which sought in
[See Note previous year the application Form 10A,
below] relevant to the is made order where the
assessment to be passed application is
year in which for provisional filed within the
the registration registration stipulated
is sought in without time limit3
Form No. 10A. detailed
enquiry.
Note – A trust which has already commenced its activities and has not availed exemption
under first regime or second regime for any P.Y. ending on or before the date of such
application, need not first apply for provisional registration in Form 10A. It can at any time
after the commencement of such activities directly apply for final registration in Form 10AB.
The PC or C after following the compliances stipulated in Column (4) [corresponding to clause
(iii) of Section 12A(1)(ac)], can grant approval within 6 months from the end of the month in
which application is received. If not satisfied, he can pass an order in writing rejecting such
application after affording it a reasonable opportunity of being heard. For such
trust/fund/institution, registration would be valid for 5 years or 10 years, as the case may be
[Section 12AB(1)(b)]. Exemption under section 11 and 12 is applicable from the A.Y.
immediately following the F.Y. in which such application is made.
Thus, only the trusts/funds/institutions which have not commenced activities are required to
get provisional registration and will fall within the scope of section 12AB(1)(c).
Condonation of delay in making application for registration / renewal of registration u/s 12A
A trust or an institution is entitled to claim exemption under second regime if it makes an
application for registration/renewal, as the case may be, to the PC or C within prescribed
time. Non filing of application within the time specified in section 12A(1)(ac) renders the
applicant ineligible to claim the exemption.
In such cases, in order to avoid difficulty and potential adverse consequences, with effect
from 1st October 2024, where an application is filed beyond the time limit specified in section
3 The CBDT Circular 6/2023 dated 24.5.2023 clarifies that the provisional registration shall be effective from
the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the application is made. However, it appears that
the intent is to make the same applicable from the assessment year for which the registration is sought,
provided the application is filed within the time limit mentioned in Column (3).
12A(1)(ac), the PC or C, may, if he considers that there is a reasonable cause for delay in
filing the application, condone such delay and such application shall be deemed to have been
filed within time.
ILLUSTRATION 6
A public trust has commenced its activities of providing “relief to poor” in the year 2023-24.
The trust intends to claim benefits of sections 11 and 12 from A.Y. 2026-27. It approaches
you in October, 2025. Total income of the trust for P.Y. 2023-24 and P.Y. 2024-25 was
` 20 lakhs and ` 45 lakhs, respectively. Advise the trust as to the time limit for making an
application for registration, time limit for granting approval by the Principal Commissioner or
Commissioner and the period for which the approval is valid.
SOLUTION
In order to avail the exemption under section 11, the trust has to obtain registration under
section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac). A trust which has already commenced its activities
can directly apply for final registration. In the present case, the trust has to apply for
registration after commencing its activities but on or before 31.3.2026 to avail the exemption
for A.Y. 2026-27. Accordingly, the time limit for making application, time limit for granting
registration and period of validity would be as follows:
S. Particulars Time Limit
No
1 Registration application to Application for final registration to be made in Form
be filed online as 10AB at any time after the commencement of such
prescribed under Rule 17A activities.
2 Grant of registration by the Grant registration within 6 months from the end of
Principal Commissioner or the quarter in which application was received after
Commissioner satisfying himself about the genuineness of
activities and compliance of other laws, as are
material for the purpose of achieving its objects. For
this purpose, the PC or C shall call for such
documents or information and make inquiries as he
thinks necessary.
If not satisfied, pass an order in writing rejecting
such application after giving opportunity of being
heard.
3 Validity period of the Registration is valid for ten years effective from the
approval A.Y. immediately following the F.Y. in which
application is made.
ILLUSTRATION 7
Help All, a trust created on 1 st April 2024 for providing relief to the poor, applied for registration
under section 12AB on 28 th February 2025. The Commissioner denied registration on the
ground that the trust had not commenced any charitable activity, due to which he could not
satisfy himself about the genuineness of the trust. Is the ground for denial of registration by
the Commissioner justified in this case? Discuss.
SOLUTION
Section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) provides that in case of a trust seeking
registration for first time, provisional registration will be provided for a period of three years
without detailed enquiry by the prescribed income-tax authority even in cases where activities
of the entity are yet to begin.
Hence, the Commissioner cannot deny registration on the ground that activities have not
commenced. The Commissioner can make detailed enquires and call for information when
the trust applies to convert its provisional registration into a final registration as stipulated
under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) read with section 12AB.
• The PCIT or CIT has noticed the occurrence of one or more specified violations
during any previous year; or
• The PCIT or CIT has received a reference from an Assessing Officer under the
second proviso to section 143(3) for any previous year to withdraw the approval or
registration due to occurrence of a specific violation; or
• The case of the institution has been selected in accordance with risk management
strategy, formulated by the CBDT from time to time for any previous year.
Note – Cancellation procedure for approval granted under first regime is similar as prescribed
above for second regime. However, the situations mentioned in (c) and (d) are mentioned
only in the case of a trust or institution registered under section 11.
− get the accounts audited by a chartered accountant and the report of such audit in the
prescribed form duly signed and verified by such accountant and setting forth such
prescribed particulars, should be furnished on or before the specified date i.e., one
month prior to the due date for filing return of income.
Rule 16CC and Rule 17B prescribe that the report of audit of the accounts of
a trust or institution is required to be furnished in
(a) Form No. 10B where -
(I) the total income of such trust or institution, without giving effect to the
provisions of 10(23C)(iv)/(v)(vi)(via) or sections 11 and 12, exceeds
` 5 crores during the previous year; or
(II) such trust or institution has received any foreign contribution during
the previous year; or
(III) such trust or institution has applied any part of its income outside
India during the previous year;
(b) Form No. 10BB in other cases.
The term “books or books of account” as defined under section 2(12A) includes ledgers, day-
books, cash books, account-books and other books, whether kept in the written form or in
electronic form or in digital form or as print-outs of data stored in such electronic form or
in digital form or in a floppy, disc, tape or any other form of electro-magnetic data storage device.
Prescribed books of account and documents
Rule 17AA prescribes the following books of account and other documents to be maintained
by the entities under both the regimes:
(a) books of account, including the following, namely: -
(i) cash book;
(ii) ledger;
(iii) journal;
(iv) copies of bills, whether machine numbered or otherwise serially numbered,
wherever such bills are issued by the assessee, and copies or counterfoils of
machine numbered or otherwise serially numbered receipts issued by the
assessee;
(v) original bills wherever issued to the person and receipts in respect of payments
made by the person;
(vi) any other book that may be required to be maintained in order to give a true
and fair view of the state of the affairs of the person and explain the transactions
effected;
(b) books of account, as referred in clause (a), for business undertaking referred in section
11(4);
(c) books of account, as referred in clause (a), for business carried on by the assessee
other than the business undertaking referred in section 11(4);
(d) other documents for maintaining,
(i) record of all the projects and institutions run by the person
(ii) record of income of the person during the previous year, in respect of -
(I) voluntary contribution containing details of name of the donor, address,
permanent account number (if available) and Aadhaar number (if
available);
(II) income from property held under trust referred to under section 11 along
with list of such properties;
(III) income of fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational
institution or any hospital or other medical institution other than the
contribution referred in items (I) and (II);
(iii) record of the following, out of the income of the person during the previous year,
namely:-
(I) application of income, in India,
(II) amount credited or paid to any fund or institution or trust or any university
or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution
referred to in first and second regime;
(III) application of income outside India;
(IV) deemed application of income;
(V) income accumulated or set apart which has not been applied or deemed
to be applied containing details of the purpose for which such income
has been accumulated;
(VI) money invested or deposited in the forms and modes specified in section
11(5);
(VII) money invested or deposited in the forms and modes other than those
specified in section 11(5);
(iv) record of the following, out of the income of the person of any previous year
preceding the current previous year, namely -
(I) application out of the income accumulated or set apart containing details
of year of accumulation, amount of application during the previous year
out of such accumulation, name and address of the person to whom any
credit or payment is made and the object for which such application is
made;
(II) application out of the deemed application of income;
(III) application, other than the application referred in item (I) and item (II),
out of income accumulated during any preceding previous year
containing details of year of accumulation, amount of application during
the previous year out of such accumulation, name and address of the
person to whom any credit or payment is made and the object for which
such application is made;
(IV) money invested or deposited in the forms and modes specified in section
11(5);
(V) money invested or deposited in the forms and modes other than those
specified in section 11(5);
(v) record of voluntary contribution made with a specific direction that they shall
form part of the corpus.
(vi) record of contribution received for the purpose of renovation or repair of temple,
mosque, gurdwara, church or other place notified under section 80G(2)(b)
which is being treated as corpus as referred section 10(23C) or in section 11(1).
(vii) record of loan or borrowings
(viii) record of properties held by the assessee
(ix) record of specified persons, as referred to in section 13(3) and transactions
undertaken by the fund or institution or trust with such specified persons .
Time period
These books of account and other documents shall be kept and maintained for a period of
ten years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
However, where the assessment in relation to any assessment year has been reopened under
section 147, the books of account and other documents which were kept and maintained at the
time of reopening of the assessment shall continue to be so kept and maintained till the
assessment so reopened has become final.
V. Application of Income – Key Considerations under both regime: We have seen that the
exemption is limited to the extent to which such income is applied. Is it necessary that the
entire income should be so applied? The Act gives a concession here. It is possible to claim
the exemption even if the trust or institution applies only 85% of the income derived from the
trust property for the purpose of the trust, during the relevant previous year.
An accumulation not exceeding 15% of the income from such property is permissible. For
computing this 15%, voluntary contributions referred to in section 12 shall be deemed to be
part of the income. The exemption under both regime will be available only if at least 85% of
the income is applied for charitable or religious purposes in India during the year and the
remaining amount i.e., 15% is invested in the forms or modes specified under section 11(5)4.
Some relevant considerations for determining application of income are discussed below:
(A) Inability to apply in full 85% of the income - It is clear from the above discussion
that free accumulation not exceeding 15% of income 5 from property is permissible.
Hence, the balance 85% must be applied during the previous year for the purposes
for which the trust has been created.
However, it is possible that the trust is unable to apply the minimum of 85% of its
income during the previous year due to either of the following reasons.
(1) The whole or any part of the income has not been received during that year.
(For e.g., if the assessee follows accrual basis of accounting wherein the
income has been recognised but not received)
(2) Any other reason (For e.g., late receipt of the income making it impossible to
spend it before the end of the year)
- In the first situation, wherein the whole or any part of the income has not
been received during that year, the period of application is extended to
cover the previous year in which the income is actually received and the
previous year immediately following the year. However, the amount
which may be so claimed to have been so applied during the subsequent
previous year cannot exceed the amount of the income which had not
been received earlier but received during a subsequent previous year.
Example 1
During the previous year ending 31 st March, 2026, a charitable trust earned an income
of ` 1,00,000 but it received only ` 60,000 in that year. The balance of ` 40,000 is
received during the previous year 2026-27.
`
Total income earned during the P.Y.2025-26 1,00,000
Less: Permissible accumulation @15% of ` 1,00,000 15,000
Balance 85% of income to be applied during the P.Y.2025-26 85,000
Less: Amount deemed to be applied would be the amount not
received during the P.Y. 2025-26 40,000
Amount to be applied in the P.Y. 2025-26 45,000
Balance amount received in P.Y.2026-27 to be applied in the 40,000
P.Y.2026-27 or P.Y.2027-28.
Note - Since this amount of ` 40,000 is received during the P.Y. 2026-27, this can
be applied in the P.Y.2026-27 or in the P.Y.2027-28.
Example 2
A trust receives a sum of ` 50,000 on 30th March, 2026. Its previous year ends on
31-3-2026.
It is obvious that it is impossible to apply the requisite sum within one day. Therefore,
it has been provided that such sum can be applied at any time during the immediately
following previous year i.e., up to 31-3-2027.
(B) Procedural Formalities: For exercising an option for availing the extended period for
application in the above two situations [Clause (2) of Explanation 1 to section 11(1)],
the trust has to exercise an option in writing that the income applied later as
prescribed may be deemed to be income applied to the relevant charitable
purposes during the previous year in which the income was derived. Such option
has to be exercised at least 2 months before the due date for filing return of income
specified under section 139(1).
The income so deemed to have been applied shall, however, not be taken into account
in calculating the amount of income applied to such purposes, during the previous year
in which the income is actually received or during the immediately following previou s
year, as the case may be.
Note: The option for availing the benefit for extended period for application of income
in the two situations mentioned above is not available to trust or institution availing
exemption under the first regime i.e., section 10(23C).
(iii) Amount credited or paid, out of accumulated income of any trust, to any
trust or institution registered under section 12AA/12AB or referred to in
section 10(23C)(iv)/(v)/(vi)/ (via), not considered as application of income
[Explanation to section 11(2)]
Any amount credited or paid, out of income derived from property held under
trust, which is not applied, but is accumulated or set apart, to any trust or
institution registered under section 12AA/12AB, or to any fund or institution or
trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other
(5) Carry forward and set off of excess application is not allowed.
(6) Application is allowed in the year in which it is actually paid.
(7) Application should not directly or indirectly benefit any person referred
to in section 13(3) and the income of the trust or institution should not
enure any benefit to such person.
(8) If the trust or institution invests or deposits back the amount into corpus
within 5 years of application from the corpus, only then such investment/
depositing back into corpus will be allowed as application for charitable
or religious purposes.
part thereof is repaid from the income of that year to the extent of such
repayment subject to satisfaction of conditions which are required to be
satisfied in case of application for charitable or religious purposes. These
conditions are as follows:
1. Application should be in India except with the approval of the Board in
accordance with the provisions of section 11(1)(c).
2. Such application should not be in the form of corpus donation to another
trust.
Note - Application from any loan or borrowing made on or before 31.3.2021 will
not be treated as application. This is because upto 31.3.2021, the amount
applied out of loan or borrowing was allowed as application. Hence, at the time
of repayment, it cannot be claimed as application once again.
SOLUTION
15% of income from property held for charitable purposes is exempt from tax
under section 11. The remaining 85% of such “income” would be exempt if it is
“applied” for charitable purposes in India.
Application of the amount can be for revenue or capital purposes. As long as
the expenditure is incurred out of income earned by the trust and for the
purposes of carrying on the objects of the trust, it would be treated as
application of income even if such expenditure is for capital purposes.
Therefore, since the building is acquired by the organization for holding classes
and office activities, which is for the purposes of carrying on the objects of the
charitable institution i.e., for providing education in hotel management, the cost
of the building would be treated as application of income.
However, section 11(6) provides that where the cost of building is claimed as
application, no other deduction for depreciation or otherwise would be allowed
as an application of income in respect of such asset for the same or any other
previous year.
If building has been acquired out of loan taken from bank, then, cost of building
cannot be claimed as application. Repayment of loan would be treated as
application in the year of repayment to the extent of amount repaid for a period
of 5 years from the end of the previous year in which building was acquired.
The repayment made upto 31.3.2031 would be eligible to be treated as
application in the respective year of repayment. Repayment made thereafter
i.e. from 1.4.2031 cannot be treated as application.
Alternatively, since cost of building is not claimed as application, depreciation
on such building can be claimed as deduction. However, if deduction in respect
of depreciation is claimed, then, it is possible to take a view that repayment of
loan may not be eligible to be treated as application.
(x) Expenditure allowed only on actual payment basis – Previously, the term
“application” included expenses that accrued during the year, even if they are
not actually paid. However, with effect from A.Y. 2022-23, any sum payable by
any trust or institution shall be treated as application of income only in the
previous year when such sum is actually paid by it. This is irrespective of the
previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred or method of
accounting regularly employed by it. Thus, expenditure is allowed as
application only when the payment is actually made and not when the liability
is incurred [Explanation to section 11].
However, where during any previous year, any sum has already been claimed
to have been applied by the trust or institution, such sum would not be allowed
as application in any subsequent previous year based on actual payment.
For example, if a trust has incurred ` 2,00,000 in the P.Y. 2020-21 and claimed
the same as application of income in that year and subsequently, the actual
payment is made in the P.Y. 2025-26. Since such sum was already claimed as
application in the P.Y. 2020-21, the same would not be allowed as application
in the P.Y. 2025-26, on the basis of actual payment.
ILLUSTRATION 10
VPS Foundation, a charitable institution registered under section 12AB set up
on 1st August 2023 is engaged in providing education in sports management.
The Foundation follows accrual basis of accounting and during the previous
year 2025-26, has accrued staff’s salary expenses pertaining to the month of
March 2026 amounting to ` 5 lakhs. The salary was paid during the first week
of April 2026. KS, the tax advisor of the foundation has advised them that the
SOLUTION
Upto Assessment Year 2021-22, an expenditure could be regarded as an
application of income even if it was not actually paid. However, effective from
assessment year 2022-23, Explanation to section 11 provides that any sum
payable by an institution shall be considered as an application of income only
in the previous year in which such sum is actually paid by it. This is irrespective
of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum is incurred by the
institution according to the method of accounting regularly employed by it.
Therefore, the tax advisor’s statement is correct.
(D) Instances where capital gains would be deemed to have been applied for
charitable purposes [Section 11(1A)]
(a) Transfer of a capital asset held under trust wholly for charitable or
religious purposes [Section 11(1A)(a)]- Where the whole of the net
consideration from the transfer of the capital asset is utilised for acquiring a
new capital asset which is held under trust wholly for charitable or religious
purposes, the entire amount of capital gains arising from the transfer would be
deemed to have been applied for charitable or religious purposes. If, however,
only a part of the net consideration is utilised in acquiring the new capital asset,
the amount of capital gains deemed to have been utilised for charitable or
religious purposes shall be equal to the excess of the proceeds utilised over
the cost of the asset transferred.
Example 3
Original cost of capital asset transferred ` 1,00,000
Consideration for which it is transferred ` 1,50,000
Situation 1 Cost of new capital asset acquired ` 1,50,000
Situation 2 Cost of new capital asset acquired ` 1,20,000
Amount that will be deemed to have been applied for charitable purposes.
Situation 1 ` 50,000
Situation 2 ` 20,000
(b) Transfer of a capital asset held under trust in part only for charitable and
religious purposes [Section 11(1A)(b)] - Where only a part of a capital asset
has been transferred, only the “appropriate fraction” of the capital gain arising
from the transfer shall be deemed to have been applied to charitable or religious
purposes. Where the whole of the net consideration is utilised in acquiring the
new capital asset, the whole of the appropriate fraction of such capital gain will
be deemed to have been so applied. In any other case, the exemption will be
limited to so much of the appropriate fraction of the amount utilised for acquiring
the new asset as exceeds the appropriate fraction of the cost of the transferred
asset.
“Appropriate fraction” means the fraction which represents the extent to which
the income derived from the capital asset transferred was applicable to
charitable or religious purposes before such transfer.
Example 4
A capital asset is being held under trust. Two-thirds of the income derived
from such capital asset are being utilised for the charitable purposes of the
trust. The asset is being transferred.
Cost of transferred asset ` 1,20,000
Net consideration ` 1,80,000
Cost of new asset acquired ` 1,50,000
Capital gains ` 60,000 [` 1,80,000 – ` 1,20,000]
Appropriate fraction 2/3rd
Income represented by ‘appropriate fraction’ = 2/3 rd of ` 60,000 = ` 40,000
Since the entire net consideration has not been utilised in acquiring the new
asset, the amount deemed to have been utilised for charitable purpose will
be (2/3 rd of ` 30,000, being the difference between cost of new asset and
cost of transferred asset) = ` 20,000.
Note – There is no provision akin to section 11(1A) in the first regime under section
10(23C).
income cannot be applied during the previous year, the same can be accumulated and applied
for such purposes, subject to satisfaction of the conditions provided therein.
Both regimes permit accumulation of 15% of the income indefinitely by the trust or institution.
However, 85% of income can only be accumulated for a period not exceeding 5 years subject
to the conditions that such person submits the prescribed form i.e., Form 10 to the Assessing
Officer and the money so accumulated or set apart is invested or deposited in the specified
forms or modes.
As per section 11(2), the conditions for accumulation are as follows:
(1) such person should furnish a statement in the prescribed form (Form 10) and in the
prescribed manner to the Assessing Officer, stating the purpose for which the income
is being accumulated or set apart and the period for which the income is being
accumulated or set apart, which shall, in no case, exceed five years.
In computing the period of five years, the period during which the income could not be
applied for the purpose for which it is so accumulated or set apart, due to an order or
injunction of any court, shall be excluded.
(2) the money so accumulated or set apart should be invested or deposited in the modes
specified in section 11(5).
(3) the statement in Form 10 should be filed at least 2 months prior to the due date of
filing return of income specified under section 139(1).
As per section 13(9), in case the statement in Form 10 is not submitted on or before the due
date under section 139(1), then, the benefit of accumulation would not be available and such
income would be taxable at the applicable rate. Further, the benefit of accumulation would
also not be available if return of income is not furnished on or before the due date of filing
return of income specified in section 139(1).
Note – Section 11(2) stipulates the conditions for accumulation, on fulfillment of which the
income so accumulated or set apart would not be included in the total income of the previous
year of the trust. The condition stipulated in clause (c) of Section 11(2) is that the statement
in Form 10 has to be furnished at least 2 months prior to the due date of filing of return of
income u/s 139(1). However, as per section 13(9), the income accumulated would not be
excluded from total income if Form 10 is not submitted on or before the due date under section
139(1). Section 13(9) permits exclusion of accumulated income from total income of the
previous year, if Form 10 is filed on or before the due date under section 139(1). CBDT
Circular No.6/2023 dated 24.5.2023 clarifies that the statement of accumulation in Form No.
10 is required to be furnished at least two months prior to the due date of furnishing return of
income so that it may be taken into account while auditing the books of account. However,
the accumulation/deemed application shall not be denied to a trust as long as the statement
of accumulation/deemed application is furnished on or before the due date of furnishing the
return as provided in section 139(1).
In case of a trust or institution which has deposited its income in forms or modes specified
under section 11(5) is dissolved, the Assessing Officer may allow application of such income
by way of payment or credit to a trust or institution registered under section 12AA/12AB or
fund or trust or institution referred to section 10(23C)(iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) [This provision is
mentioned only with reference to the second regime].
ILLUSTRATION 11
A charitable institution registered under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 filled in
Form No.10 for seeking permission to accumulate unapplied income under section 11(2) of
the Act for the objects of the institution and submitted it to the Assessing Officer along with
the resolution for accumulation. The Assessing Officer found that the objects for which
accumulation was sought were not particularised in as much as they covered the entire range
of objects of the institution. Can the Assessing Officer deny the benefit of accumulation in
such a case?
SOLUTION
Section 11(2) permits a charitable trust or institution to accumulate its unspent income where 85%
of the income is not applied or is not deemed to have been applied to charitable or religious
purposes in India during the previous year. The institution or trust has to specify, in the statement
furnished to the Assessing Officer, the purpose for which the income is being accumulated or set
apart and the period for which such income is to be accumulated or set apart.
In the given case, the assessee institution sought the permission of the Assessing Officer to
accumulate unapplied income for the objects of the institution. The institution had not stated
any objects in particular for which the unspent income was sought to be accumulated or set
apart. In Bharat Krishak Samaj vs. Deputy Director of Income-tax (Exemption) (2008) 306
ITR 153 (Del.), it was held that it is not necessary for a charitable trust to particularize each
and every object for which accumulation is sought. It is enough if the assessee seeks
permission for accumulation for the objects of the trust. Therefore, the Assessing Officer
cannot deny the benefit of accumulation in such a case.
ILLUSTRATION 12
A charitable institution registered under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the
previous year ended 31 March 2026, filled in Form No.10 for seeking permission to
accumulate unapplied income for a period of five years under section 11(2) of the Act for the
objects of the institution and submitted it to the Assessing Officer along with the resolution
for accumulation. The charitable institution could not utilise the accumulated income within
the period of five years. Examine the consequences of the same for the charitable institution
with regards to the accumulated income.
SOLUTION
Section 11(3) provides for consequences when an assessee registered under section 12AB
fails to satisfy the conditions of 11(2) accumulation. In this regard, the charitable institution
has not utilised the accumulated income of P.Y. 2025-26 within a period of five years as
specified in Form 10. Hence, by virtue of section 11(3), the said income will be deemed to be
the income of the charitable institution of the previous year, being the last previous year of
the period for which the income accumulated is not utilised. Hence, the said income will be
taxable in the 5th year as it is the last previous year of the period of accumulation.
(10) Deposits with or investment in any bonds issued by a public company formed and
registered in India with the main object of carrying on the business of providing long -
term finance for urban infrastructure in India.
"Long-term finance" means any loan or advance where the terms under which moneys
are loaned or advanced provide for repayment along with interest thereof during a
period of not less than five years.
"Urban infrastructure" means a project for providing potable water supply, sanitation
and sewerage, drainage, solid waste management, road, bridges and flyovers or urban
transport.
(11) Investment in immovable property excluding plant and machinery, not being plant and
machinery installed in a building for the convenient occupation thereof.
(12) Deposits with Industrial Development Bank of India.
(13) Any other mode of investment or deposit as may be prescribed. Rule 17C
specifies the following other modes:
(i) Investments in units issued under any scheme of mutual fund referred to in
section 10(23D);
(ii) Any transfer of deposits to Public Account of India;
(iii) Deposits made with an authority constituted in India or under any law enacted
either for the purpose of dealing with and satisfying the need for housing
accommodation or for the purpose of planning, development or improvement of
cities, towns and villages, or for both;
(iv) investment by way of acquiring equity shares of a ‘depository’;
(v) investment by a recognized Stock Exchange, in the equity shares of a company
promoted by it to acquire the membership rights of other stock exchanges,
where at least 51% of the paid-up share capital is held by the Stock Exchange
and the balance is held by its members;
(vi) investment made by a person, authorised under section 4 of the Payment and
Settlement Systems Act, 2007, in the equity share capital or bonds or
debentures of a company —
(A) which is engaged in operations of retail payments system or digital
payments settlement or similar activities in India and abroad and is
approved by the Reserve Bank of India for this purpose; and
(B) in which at least 51% of equity shares are held by National Payments
Corporation of India.
(vii) investment made by a person, authorised under section 4 of the Payment and
Settlement Systems Act, 2007, in the equity share capital or bonds or
debentures of Open Network for Digital Commerce Ltd, being a company
incorporated under section 7(2) read with section 8(1) of the Companies Act,
2013, for participating in network based open protocol models which enable
digital commerce and interoperable digital payments in India;
(viii) investment by way of acquiring equity shares of an incubatee by an incubator;
(ix) investment by way of acquiring shares of National Skill Development
Corporation;
(x) investment in debt instruments issued by any infrastructure finance company
registered with RBI;
(xi) investment in Stock Certificate as defined in of Sovereign Gold Bonds Scheme,
2015.
(xii) investment by way of acquiring units of POWERGRID Infrastructure
Investment Trust.
ILLUSTRATION 13
A charitable trust derives its income from the business of providing mineral water to various
companies situated in Software Technology Park in Hyderabad. A sum of ` 30 lakhs has
been derived as net income from such business activity, which has been applied for the object
of general public utility. The total receipts of the trust during the P.Y. 2025-26 was
` 140 lakhs.
Examine the taxability of application of the income, if the income so derived relates to the
previous year 2025-26. Would your answer be different, if the trust runs a school in a
backward district and applies the profits from the business for such school's activity?
SOLUTION
In the first case, net income from the business of supplying mineral water to various
companies i.e., ` 30 lakhs is not eligible for exemption under section 11, since the receipt
from such activity exceeds 20% of total receipts (i.e., 20% of ` 140 lakhs) during the year.
This is because “advancement of any object of general public utility” would not be a charitable
purpose if it involves carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business,
for example, supply of mineral water for a consideration, as in this case. It is immaterial that
the net income from such business is applied for the object of general public utility. On the
other hand, where the trust runs a school in a backward district, this restriction is not
applicable. The reason is that the restriction contained in section 2(15) is applicable only to
the last limb of the definition of “charitable purpose” i.e. advancement of object of general
public utility. It does not affect the other limbs of the definition viz. “relief of the poor”,
“education”, “medical relief” etc.
Section 11(4) clarifies that “property held under trust” includes a business undertaking so
held. As per section 11(4A), exemption can be availed in respect of profits and gains of
business, if such business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the trust and
separate books of account are maintained in respect of such business. Therefore, in the
second case, the profit from the business shall be eligible for exemption under section 11,
assuming that the said business is incidental to the attainment of the objects of the trust (i.e.,
education) and books of account for such business activity is maintained separately.
VII. No claim for exemption under section 10 permissible where trust has been granted
registration/approval for availing exemption under section 11 or under section 10(23C)
Where a trust or an institution or fund has been granted registration/approval for purposes of
availing exemption under second regime, and the registration is in force for a previous year,
then, such trust or institution cannot claim any exemption under any provision of section 10
[other than exemption of agricultural income under section 10(1)].
Prior to 1 st June 2020, the organisation registered u/s 12AA could also avail approval u/s
10(23C) or 10(46) and thus, could avail tax exemption under either of the two sections.
However, with effect from 1 June 2020, the registration granted for availing exemption under
section 11 would become inoperative from the date on which the trust or institution is
approved under section 10(23C) or is notified under section 10(23EC) or under section 10(46)
or under section 10(46A).
Accordingly, the registration granted for availing exemption under section 11 would become
inoperative from the date on which the trust or institution is approved under section 10(23C)
or is notified under section 10(23EA) or section 10(23EC) or section 10(23ED) or section
10(46) or section 10(46A) or from 1st April of the P.Y. for which exemption is claimed under
section 10(46B) [First proviso to section 11(7)].
The trust or institution, whose registration/approval has become inoperative, may apply to get
its registration operative under section 12AB/ 10(23C)(iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) subject to the condition
that on doing so, the approval under section 10(23C) or notification under section
10(23EA)/(23EC)/ (23ED)/10(46) or 10(46A), as the case may be, to such trust or institution
shall cease to have any effect from the date on which the said registration/approval becomes
operative and thereafter, it shall not be entitled to exemption under section 10(23C) or under
section 10(23EA)(23EC)/(23ED) or section 10(46) or section 10(46A), as the case may be
[Second proviso to section 11(7)].
Note: The situations referred to in (a) & (b) on non-availability of exemption are with
reference to only income under the second regime.
(c) Income of trust enuring for the benefit of any person referred to in section 13(3)
[Section 13(1)(c)]: Where any part of the income or property of trust or the institution
enures directly or indirectly for the benefit of any person referred to in section 13(3),
then such part of the income shall not be eligible for exemption and the said income
will taxed at 30% under Section 115BBI.
Such part of income or property would not be eligible for exemption and would be
taxed under section 115BBI at 30%. Further, to avoid income of the trusts or
institutions to be used for the benefit of specified persons under section 13(3), penalty
is leviable under 271AAE on the amount of income provided as a benefit.
(d) any asset not covered under section 11(5), where such asset is held for not
more than one year from the end of the previous year in which such asset is
acquired.
(e) any funds representing the profits and gains of business. However, where a
trust has any other income in addition to profits and gains of business, such
relaxation of the restriction will be denied unless the trust keeps separate
accounts for the business. [This is applicable only for the second regime].
Note – Under the first regime, the 3 rd proviso to section 10(23C), requiring investment
or deposit of funds in forms or modes specified under section 11(5), contains similar
exclusions [mentioned in (a), (b), (c) and (d) above]. In addition, voluntary
contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture or any other
article as the Board may specify, are also excluded from the applicability of this
requirement under the first regime.
W.e.f. 1 st October 2024, no application for approval can be made under the first
regime, resultantly, certain trusts or institutions need to shift from first regime to
second regime. In order to provide protection to these trusts or institutions the assets
permissible for investment in first regime i.e., mentioned in (a), (b), (c) and (d) above
and voluntary contributions received and maintained in the form of jewellery, furniture
or any other article as the Board may specify are also included under section 13(1)d).
(B) Prohibited use or application -We have noted above that when any part of the income or
any property of the trust whenever created, is, during the previous year, used or applied
directly, for the benefit of any person referred to in section 13(3), the denial of exemption
operates. Section 13(2) specifies a few particular instances where the income or the property
is to be deemed to have been used for the benefit of a person referred to in section 13(3). It
should be noted that those particular instances do not in any way restrict the general meaning
of the expression “used or applied for the benefit of a person”. The provisions of section 13(2)
are as follows:
The income or the property of the trust or institution or any part of such income or property is
to be deemed to have been used or applied for the benefit of a person referred to in section
13(3) in the following cases:
(a) Loan without adequate interest or adequate security - If any part of the income or
the property of the trust or institution is or continues to be lent to any person referred
to in section 13(3) for any period during the previous year without either adequate
security or adequate interest or both.
(b) Allowing use of property without adequate rent -If any land, building or other
property of the trust or institution is or continues to be, made available, for the use of
any person referred to in section 13(3) for any period during the previous year without
charging adequate rent or other compensation.
(c) Excess payment for services - If any amount is paid out of the resources of the trust
or institution to any of the persons referred to in section 13(3) for services rendered to
the trust or institution but such amount is in excess of a reasonable sum payable for
such services.
(d) Inadequate remuneration for services rendered - If the services of the trust or
institution are made available to any person referred to section 13(3) without ade quate
remuneration or other compensation.
(e) Excess payment for purchase of property - If any share, security or other property
is purchased by or on behalf of the trust or institution from any person re ferred to in
section 13(3) during the previous year for a consideration which is more than
adequate.
(f) Inadequate consideration for property sold - If any share, security or other property
is sold by or on behalf of the trust or institution to any person referred to in section
13(3) during the previous year for a consideration which is less than adequate.
(h) Investment in substantial interest concerns - If any funds of the trust or institution
are, or continue to remain, invested for any period during the previous year in any
concern in which any person referred to in section 13(3) has a substantial interest.
Section 13(4) provides some respite where the aggregate of the funds invested in the
said concern does not exceed five per cent of the capital of that concern. In such a
case, the exemption under section 11 or 12 will be denied only in relation to such
income as arises out of the said investment. Exemption will not be denied to the
remaining income only due to this reason.
(C) Prohibited category of persons - Section 13(3) gives the list of persons, use or application
of the income or property of a trust for whose direct or indirect benefit results in a denial of
the exemption contemplated in section 11 for a charitable or religious trust or institution. The
said persons are:
(2) Any person whose total contribution to the trust or institution, during the
relevant previous year exceeds ` 1 lakh, or, in aggregate up to the end of the
relevant previous year exceeds ` 10 lakh rupees, as the case may be.
(3) Where the author, founder or the person is a HUF, any member of the family.
(4) Any trustee of the trust or manager (by whatever name called) of the institution.
(5) Any relative of any such author, founder, member, trustee or manager as referred to
above.
(6) Any concern in which any of the persons referred to in clauses (1) to (5) except (2)
above has a substantial interest.
(g) any lineal descendant of a brother or sister of either the individual or the spouse of the
individual;
Substantial interest in a concern - Section 13(2)(h), section 13(3) and section 13(4) refers
to cases where a person has a substantial interest in a concern. These references occur
where the “Prohibited use or application” and “Prohibited category of persons” have been
described. The circumstances in which a person shall be deemed to have a substantial
interest in a concern, have been laid down in Explanation 3 to section 13.
(F) Exemption to be denied to a charitable trust having its main object as “advancement
of any other object of general public utility” if its trading receipts exceed the specified
threshold irrespective of withdrawal of approval or cancellation of registration or
rescindment of notification [Section 13(8)]
(a) Under both regimes, income of any charitable trust or institution is exempt if such
income is applied for charitable purposes in India and such institution is registered
under second regime or approved under first regime.
(b) The definition of “charitable purpose” under section 2(15) provides that the
advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a charitable
purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce
or business, or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce
or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of
use or application, or retention, of the income from such activity, unless,-
(1) such activity is undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such
advancement of any other object of general public utility; and
(2) the aggregate receipts from such activity or activities, during the previous year,
does not exceed 20% of the total receipts, of the trust or institution undertaking
such activity or activities, for the previous year .
(c) Thus, a charitable trust or institution pursuing “advancement of object of general public
utility” may be a charitable trust in one year and not a charitable trust in another year
depending on the percentage of receipts from commercial activities vis-à-vis its total
receipts.
(d) Therefore, no exemption would be available to a trust or institution for the previous year
in which the receipts from commercial activities exceed 20% of the total receipts of that
year. However, this temporary excess in one year may not be treated as altering the very
nature of the trust or institution so as to lead to cancellation of registration or withdrawal
of approval or rescinding of notification issued in respect of trust or institution.
(e) Therefore, there is need to ensure that if the purpose of a trust or institution does not
remain charitable in a previous year on account of the commercial receipts exceeding
the specified percentage of total receipts, then, such trust or institution would not be
entitled to get benefit of exemption in respect of its income for that previous year in
which the commercial receipts exceed the specified percentage of total receipts. The
denial of exemption would be compulsory by operation of law and would n ot be
Note – Section 11(2) stipulates the conditions for accumulation, on fulfillment of which the
income so accumulated or set apart would not be included in the total income of the previous
year of the trust. The condition stipulated in clause (c) of Section 11(2) is that the statement
in Form 10 has to be furnished at least 2 months prior to the due date of filing of return of
income u/s 139(1). However, as per section 13(9), the income accumulated would not be
excluded from total income if Form 10 is not submitted on or before the due date under section
139(1). Section 13(9) permits exclusion of accumulated income from total income of the
previous year, if Form 10 is filed on or before the due date under section 139(1). CBDT
Circular No.6/2023 dated 24.5.2023 clarifies that the statement of accumulation in Form No.
10 is required to be furnished at least two months prior to the due date of furnishing return of
income so that it may be taken into account while auditing the books of account. However,
the accumulation/deemed application shall not be denied to a trust as long as the statement
of accumulation/deemed application is furnished on or before the due date of furnishing the
return as provided in section 139(1).
deduction for expenditure (other than capital expenditure) incurred in India for the objects of
the trust/ institution.
The following are the violations:
- It has receipts from trade, commerce etc. while advancing the object of general public
utility, in excess of 20% of total receipt;
- It fails to maintain prescribed books of account;
- It fails to get its books of account audited and furnish audit report on or before the
specified date;
- It fails to file return of income under section 139(4A) (or 139(4C), as the case may be,
for the first regime trust) within the time stipulated under section 139(1) or 139(4).
(ii) Conditions to be fulfilled for claim of deduction of revenue expenditure: The deduction
for revenue expenditure incurred is subject to fulfilment of the following conditions:
(a) such expenditure is not from the corpus standing to the credit of the trust or institution
as on the end of the financial year immediately preceding the previous year relevant
to the assessment year for which income is being computed;
(b) such expenditure is not from any loan or borrowing;
(c) there is no claim of depreciation on those assets, whose acquisition cost has been
claimed as application of income in any previous year; and
(d) such expenditure is not in form of any contribution or donation to any person.
(iii) Disallowances: While determining the amount of expenditure allowable as deduction, the
following points need to be considered:
(a) Capital expenditure is not allowed as a deduction.
(b) Disallowance under sections 40(a)(ia), on account of non-deduction of tax or non-
payment of tax deducted at source on or before the due date of filing of return, would
be attracted
(c) Disallowance of expenditure in respect of cash payment in excess of ` 10,000 under
section 40A(3) and 40A(3A) would be attracted .
(d) no deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance or set-off of any loss shall be
allowed to the assessee under any other provision of this Act.
(ii) As per section 115BBC anonymous donations received by the above entities are taxed at
30%.
(iii) In order to provide relief to these trusts and institutions and to reduce their compliance
burden, an exemption limit has been introduced, and only the anonymous donations in excess
of this limit would be subject to tax@30% under section 115BBC.
(iv) The exemption limit is the higher of the following –
(1) 5% of the total donations received by the assessee; or
(2) ` 1 lakh.
(v) The total tax payable by such institutions would be –
(1) tax@30% on anonymous donations exceeding the exemption limit as calculated
above; and
(2) tax on the balance income i.e., total income as reduced by the anonymous donations
which have been subject to tax@30% under section 115BBC.
(vi) The following table illustrates the calculation of anonymous donations liable to tax @30%
under section 115BBC –
I II III IV V VI
Situation Total Anonymous Exemption Anonymous Donations
donations donations [5% of total donations subject to
during the received donations or taxable@30% tax at
year (`) during the ` 1,00,000, (`) normal
year (`) whichever is rates# (`)
higher] (`)
A 15,00,000 4,00,000 1,00,000 3,00,000 12,00,000
B 30,00,000 7,00,000 1,50,000 5,50,000 24,50,000
C 40,00,000 10,00,000 2,00,000 8,00,000 32,00,000
# It is possible to take a view that the remaining donations reflected in Column VI which are
taxable at normal rates would be eligible for application of income and thereby, the benefit of
exemption under section 11 can be claimed in respect of such donations.
(vii) For this purpose, “anonymous donation” means any
voluntary contribution referred to in section 2(24)(iia), Section 115BBC does not
where the person receiving such contribution does not apply to trust or institution
maintain a record of the identity indicating the name and wholly for religious
address of the person making such contribution and such purposes.
other particulars as may be prescribed.
(viii) However, the above provision does not apply to a trust or institution created or established
wholly for religious purposes.
(ix) Further, anonymous donations to trusts/institutions created or established wholly for religious
and charitable purposes (i.e., partly charitable and partly religious institutions/trusts) would
be taxed only if such anonymous donation is made with a specific direction that such donation
is for any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institu tion
run by such trust or institution. Other anonymous donations received by such
trusts/institutions are not taxable.
(x) Section 13(7) provides that the exemption provisions contained in section 11 or section 12
shall not be applicable in respect of any anonymous donation referred to in section 115BBC
on which tax is payable in accordance with the provisions of that section.
(xi) For example, section 11(1)(d) provides that any income in the form of voluntary contributions
made with a specific direction that they shall form part of the corpus of the trust or institution
and deposited or invested in modes specified u/s 11(5), shall not be included in the total
income of such trust/institution for the relevant previous year. However, if a trust or institution
established wholly for charitable purposes receives an anonymous donation with a specific
direction that the donation shall form part of the corpus of the trust or institution, such
anonymous donation would not be exempt by virtue of section 11(1)(d). It would be taxable
at 30% as provided in section 115BBC.
(xii) Similarly, section 10(23C) provides that any anonymous donation referred to in section
115BBC on which tax is payable in accordance with the provisions of the said section shall
be included in the total income. Consequently, sections 10(23C) and 13 provide that any
income by way of any anonymous donation which is taxable under the provisions of section
115BBC shall not be excluded from the total income of the trust or institution.
ILLUSTRATION 14
The following trusts claim that anonymous donations received by them during the financial
year 2025-26 are not liable to tax under section 115BBC:
(i) A charitable trust referred to in section 11 which applied the entire amount of
anonymous donations for purposes of the trust during the relevant financial year.
(ii) A trust established wholly for religious purposes which applied 85% of the amount of
anonymous donations for the purposes of the objects of the trust during the relevant
financial year.
Examine the validity of the claim made by the trusts.
SOLUTION
(i) Section 115BBC provides for levy of tax @ 30% on anonymous donation received by,
inter alia, charitable trusts or institutions referred to in section 11 in the following
manner:
(a) the amount of income-tax calculated @30% on the aggregate of anonymous
donations received in excess of 5% of the total donations received by the
assessee or one lakh rupees, whichever is higher; and
(b) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable
had his total income been reduced by the aggregate of the anonymous
donations received in excess of 5% of the total donations received by the
assessee or ` 1 lakh, as the case may be.
Further, section 13(7) provides that the exemption provisions contained in sections 11
and 12 shall not be applicable in respect of any anonymous donation liable to tax under
section 115BBC. As such, application of the anonymous donations received by the
charitable trust for charitable purposes does not confer any exemption from tax.
Therefore, the claim for non-taxability under section 115BBC of anonymous donations
received by the charitable trust is not valid in law.
However, a view may be taken that anonymous donation upto higher of 5% of total
donations or ` 1 lakh, which is taxable at normal rates would be eligible for application
of income and thereby, the benefit of exemption under section 11 would apply.
(ii) Section 115BBC(2) provides that the provisions contained in section 115BBC(1)
relating to the taxability of anonymous donations are not applicable to any trust or
institution created or established wholly for religious purposes. As such, the trust
established wholly for religious purposes is not liable to be taxed in respect of the
anonymous donations received by it. Therefore, the claim made by the trust is valid in
law. The application or non-application of such anonymous donation for the purposes
of trust during the relevant financial year is not germane to the issue of taxability under
section 115BBC.
Further, no deduction in respect of any expenditure or allowance or set-off of any loss would
be allowed under any provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 while computing specified
income.
(iii) Meaning of “Specified Income”
“Specified income” means:
(a) income accumulated or set apart in excess of 15% of the income, where such
accumulation is not allowed under any specific provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
(b) deemed income on account of violation of certain conditions stipulated for
accumulation of income under section 11(3) and corresponding provision in section
10(23C).
(c) deemed income on account of violation of deemed application provisions specified
under 11(1B) read with Explanation 1 below to section 11(1).
(d) any income which is not exempt under section 10(23C) on account of violation of the
provisions of clause (b) of the third proviso to section 10(23C) i.e., invested in
impermissible mode or which is not excluded from the total income as per section
13(1)(d).
(e) any income which is applied for the benefit of any specified prohibited person referred
to in section 13(3).
(f) any income derived from a property held under trust for a charitable purpose which
tends to promote international welfare in which India is interested to the extent to which
such income is not applied towards charitable purposes outside India.
ILLUSTRATION 15
SR Trust is a registered charitable trust under section 12AB. During the P.Y.2025-26, the trust had
applied ` 5 lakh for the benefit of the trustee and ` 3 lakh for the benefit of Mr. Satish, who has
donated ` 15 lakh to the trust upto 31.3.2026. Also, an amount of ` 2 lakh set apart in the
P.Y.2023-24 by the trust for charitable purposes u/s 11(2) has been utilized in the P.Y. 2025-26 for
making donation to another registered charitable trust with similar object as SR Trust. What is the
amount of “specified income” liable to tax@30% under section 115BBI for A.Y. 2026-27?
SOLUTION
Section 115BBI provides for levy of tax @ 30% on certain “specified income” of a trust. Section
115BBI defines “specified income” to include income which has been applied for the benefit of
prohibited persons u/s 13(3), which includes, inter alia, trustee of the trust and a person who has
made substantial contribution to the trust (i.e., whose total contribution during the relevant
P.Y. exceeds ` 1 lakh or in aggregate upto 31.3.2026 is more than ` 10,00,000). Specified income
also includes deemed income on account of violation of certain conditions stipulated in section 11(3)
for accumulation of income. Donation to another charitable trust out of accumulated income is one
such violation. Accordingly, “specified income” of SR Trust liable to tax@30% under section 115BBI
for A.Y. 2026-27 would be ` 10 lakh [` 5 lakh (amount applied for the benefit of the trustee) + ` 3
lakh (amount applied for the benefit of Mr. Satish) + ` 2 lakh (donation made to another trust out of
accumulated income of an earlier previous year].
There is, however, no specific provision in the income-tax law as to how the assets of
such a charitable institution should be dealt with.
(vi) Under section 11, certain amount of income of prior period can be brought to tax on
failure of certain conditions. However, there is no provision in the Income -tax Act,
1961, which ensure that the corpus and asset base of the trust accreted over a per iod
of time, with promise of it being used for charitable purpose, continues to be utilised
for charitable purposes and is not used for any other purpose.
(vii) Consequently, it is always possible for charitable institutions to transfer assets to a
non-charitable institution.
(viii) In order to ensure that the benefit conferred over a period of time by way of exemption
is not misused and to plug the gap in law that allows the charitable trusts having built
up corpus/wealth through exemptions being converted into non-charitable
organisation with no tax consequences, Chapter XII-EB imposes additional income-
tax in the nature of an exit tax when the organization is converted into a non-charitable
organization or gets merged with a non-charitable organization or does not transfer
the assets to another charitable organisation.
(ix) Upto A.Y.2022-23, the provisions of the Chapter XII-EB comprising of sections 115TD,
115TE and 115TF were made applicable to only the trusts or institutions under the
second regime. With effect from A.Y. 2023-24, the provisions of Chapter XII-EB also
extended to trusts or institutions or fund approved under first regime.
For this purpose, term “specified person” has been inserted to include within its ambit
the trust or institution under first regime and provisions of section 115TD, 115TE and
115TF has been amended.
(x) For the purposes of section 115TD, 115TE and 115TF, “Specified person” means
(a) any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution
or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in section 10(23C)(iv)/
(v)/ (vi)/(via); or
(b) a trust or institution registered under section 12AA or section 12AB.
(2) Salient Features:
Section Provision
(i) 115TD(1) Circumstances where levy of tax on accreted income is attracted:
The accreted income of a specified person shall be taxable at the
maximum marginal rate@34.944% on –
(1) conversion into a form not eligible for grant of registration under
section 12AA or section 12AB or approval under section 10(23C)
(iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via); or
(2) merger with an entity not having similar objects and registered
under section 12AA or section 12AB or approved under section
10(23C) (iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via); or
(3) non-distribution of assets on dissolution to any other specified
person within a period of 12 months from the end of the month
in which the dissolution takes place.
This levy of exit tax shall be in addition to income chargeable in the
hands of the entity.
W.e.f. A.Y. 2025-26, section 12AC has been inserted to provide that
where a trust or institution approved under the first regime or registered
under the second regime, as the case may be, merges with another trust
or institution, the exit tax provisions contained in Chapter XII-EB i.e., exit
tax would not apply if –
• the other trust or institution has same or similar objects.
• the other trust or institution is approved under the first regime or
registered under the second regime; and
• the said merger fulfils the conditions as may be prescribed.
(ii) 115TD(3) Deemed conversion into non-eligible form - Circumstances:
A specified person shall be deemed to have been converted into any
form not eligible for registration under section 12AA or section 12AB
or approval under section 10(23C) (iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via) in a previous
year, if, —
(i) the registration granted to it under section 12AA or section
12AB or approval under section 10(23C) (iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via) has
been cancelled; or
(ii) it has adopted or undertaken modification of its objects which
do not conform to the conditions of registration and,—
(a) it has not applied for fresh registration under section
12AA or section 12AB or approval under section
10(23C)(iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via) in the said previous year; or
(b) it has filed application for fresh registration u/s 12AA or
12AB or approval under section 10(23C)
(iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) but the said application has been
rejected; or
(iii) it has failed to make an application for –
(a) reapproval/re-registration; or
6Where the benefit under sections 11 and 12 or section 10(23C) (iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via) have been allowed to the trust
or institution in respect of any previous year or years beginning prior to the date from which the registration or
approval under section 12AA or 12AB or under section 10(23C) (iv) /(v)/ (vi)/ (via) became effective, then, the
registration or approval shall be deemed to have become effective from the first day of the earliest previous year.
Accordingly, accreted income attributable to asset acquired during the said period has to be considered. Liability in
relation to such asset has to be reduced.
(a) re-registration/re-
approval; or
(b) renewal of
registration/
approval, where the
period of validity of
registration or
approval set to
expire; or
(c) final registration/
approval within the
specified time period
which expires in the
relevant P.Y.
(3) Where the trust has the date on which –
modified its objects and (a) the period for filing appeal
has filed application for under section 253 against
fresh registration u/s the order rejecting the
12AA/12AB or approval application expires an no
under section 10(23C)(iv)/ appeal has been filed by
(v)/(vi)/(via) but the same the specified person; (or)
was rejected (b) the order in any appeal,
confirming the cancellation
of the application, is
received by the specified
person
(4) Where trust has merged the date of merger
with an entity not having
similar objects or not
registered u/s 12AA/12AB
or not approved under
section 10(23C) (iv) /(v)/
(vi)/ (via)
(5) Where the trust fails to the date on which the period of 12
transfer upon dissolution months expires.
all its assets to another
registered trust or
institution or approved
fund or institution within 12
months from the end of the
month in which the
dissolution takes place
Note - As per section 115TD(2), “Accreted Income” means the aggregate FMV of total assets
of the specified person as on the specified date less total liability of such specified person
computed in accordance with the prescribed method of valuation. Accordingly, Rule 17CB
provide for method of valuation of assets and liabilities.
(v) any amount representing provision for taxation, other than the amount of tax
paid as deduction or collection at source or as advance tax payment as
reduced by the amount of income-tax claimed as refund under the Act, to the
extent of the excess over the income-tax payable with reference to the income
in accordance with the law applicable thereto.
Expla- Meaning of certain terms
nation Term Meaning
Accountant A fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India within
the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 who is not
appointed by the specified person as an auditor;
Balance The Balance Sheet of such specified person (including the notes
sheet annexed thereto and forming part of the accounts) as drawn up
on the specified date which has been audited by an accountant.
Quoted A share or security quoted on any recognised stock exchange with
share or regularity from time to time, where the quotations of such shares
security or securities are based on current transaction made in the
ordinary course of business;
Specified The date referred to in Explanation to section 115TD of the Act.
date Meaning of specified date [Explanation below section 115TD]:
Case Specified Date
(i) Conversion into a form not The date of conversion
eligible for registration u/s
12AA/12AB or approved u/s
10(23C)(vi)/(v)/(vi)/(via)
Date of conversion
(a) date of order cancelling registration or approval
(b) date of adoption or modification of any object
(c) last date for making an application for renewal of
registration/ approval or re-registration/re-approval where the
period of validity set to expire or final registration/approval
(ii) merger with an entity not The date of merger
having similar objects or not
registered u/s 12AA/12AB or
not approved u/s
10(23C)(vi)/(v)/(vi)/(via)
(iii) non-distribution of assets on The date of dissolution
dissolution to any charitable
The representative assessees referred to in clauses (iii) and (iv) of section 160(1) are the Court of
Wards, the Administrator General, the Official Trustee or any receiver or manager including any
person whatever his designation who in fact manages the property on behalf of another, appointed
by or under any order of a Court and a trustee appointed under a trust declared by a duly executed
instrument in writing whether testamentary or otherwise (including any Wakf Validating Act, 1913).
Such a discretionary trust will be liable to tax at the maximum marginal rate of income -tax on their
entire income.
With a view to obviating hardship in genuine cases where the circumstances are such that tax
evasion could not be considered to be main purpose of creating a trust, certain exceptions have
been specified where the trust would not be taxed at the maximum marginal rate. The exceptions
are as under:
(1) Where none of the beneficiaries has any other income chargeable to tax exceeding the
maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax in the case of an AOP and none of the
beneficiaries is a beneficiary under any other trust; or
(2) Where the relevant income or part of the relevant income is receivable under a trust declared
by any person by a will and such trust is the only trust so declared under the will.
(3) the relevant income or part of relevant income is receivable under a trust created before
1.3.1970 by a non-testamentary instrument and the Assessing Officer is satisfied that the
trust was so created bona fide exclusively for benefit of the dependent relatives of settlor or
where the settlor is a HUF for the benefit of the members of such families in circumstances
where such relatives or members are mainly dependent on the settlor for their support and
maintenance.
(4) In cases where the relevant income is receivable by the trustee on behalf of provident fund,
superannuation fund, gratuity fund, pension fund or any other fund created bona fide by a
person carrying on a business or profession exclusively for the benefit of persons employed
in such business or professions.
In the above four cases the income of the trustees will not be taxed at the maximum marginal rate.
The relevant income or part of relevant income will be taxable as if it were the total income of an
AOP.
Where any income in respect of which a trustee appointed under a trust declared by a duly executed
instrument in writing whether testamentary or otherwise, is liable as a repre sentative assessee
consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, the above concessional treatment i.e.
assessing the income at the rate applicable to an AOP will apply only if such profits and gains are
receivable under a trust declared by any person by will exclusively for the benefit of any relative
dependent on him for support and maintenance and such trust is the only trust so declared by him.
For the purposes of these provisions, a trust under which a discretionary power is given to the
trustees to decide the allocation of the income every year or a right is given to the beneficiary to
exercise the option to receive the income or not each year will all be regarded as discretionary trusts
and assessed accordingly. This is made clear in Explanation 1 to section 164 which provides as
under:
(a) Any income in respect of which the Court of Wards, the Administrator General, the Official
Trustee, receiver, manager or trustee appointed under a trust declared by a duly executed
instrument in writing (including Wakf deed) is liable as a representative assessee or any part
thereof shall be regarded as not being specifically receivable on behalf or for the benefit of
any person unless the person on whose behalf or for whose benefit such income or such part
thereof is receivable during the previous year is expressly stated in the order of the Court or
the instruments of trust or wakf deed, as the case may be, and is identifiable as such on the
date of such order, instrument or deed.
(b) The individual shares of the person on whose behalf or for whose benefit such income or part
thereof is receivable will be regarded as indeterminate or unknown unless the individual
shares of such persons are expressly stated in the order of the court or the instrument of trust
or wakf deed, as the case may be, and are ascertainable as such on the date of such order,
instrument or deed.
This Explanation seeks to prevent trustees and beneficiaries from manipulating the arrangements in
such a manner that a discretionary trust is converted into a specific trust whenever it suits them tax-wise.
(1) Income from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes
[Section 164(2)]: In case the relevant income, (in respect of which the shares of the
beneficiaries are indeterminate or unknown), is derived from property held under trust wholly
for charitable or religious purpose or which is of the nature referred to in section 2(24)(iia)
[voluntary contributions received by a trust] or which is of the nature referred to in sub-section
(4A) of section 11 [business income received by a trust], the tax shall be charged on so much
of the income as is not exempt under section 11 or section 12 as if the income not so exempt
were the relevant income of an association of persons.
However, where the whole or any part of the relevant income is not exempt under section 11
or section 12 because any income thereof is for the benefit of prohibited persons or the rules
with regard to investments in specified channels have not been followed, tax shall be charged
on the relevant income or part of relevant income at the maximum marginal rate.
(2) Income from property held under trust partly for charitable or religious purposes and
partly for other purposes [Section 164(3)]: In case the relevant income is derived from
property held under trust partly for charitable or religious purposes and partly for other
purposes or which is of the nature referred to in section 2(24)(iia) (voluntary contributions
received by a trust) or which is of the nature referred to in sub-section (4A) of section 11
(business income received by a trust) and the individual share of the beneficiaries in the
income applicable to purposes other than charitable or religious purposes is not known, tax
liability will be the aggregate of the following:
(a) the tax which would be chargeable on that part of the relevant income which is
applicable to charitable or religious purposes (as reduced by the income, if any, which
is exempt under section 11 as if such part (or such part so reduced) were the total
income of the association of persons; and
(b) the tax on that part of the relevant income which is applicable to purposes other than
charitable or religious purposes, and which is either not specifically receivable on
behalf of or for the benefit of any one person or in respect of which shares of
beneficiaries are indeterminate or unknown, at the maximum marginal rate.
However, in the following cases, income will be charged to tax as if it were income of an
association of persons:
(a) where none of the beneficiaries has any other income chargeable to tax exceeding the
maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax in the case of an AOP and none of
the beneficiaries is a beneficiary under any other trust; or
(b) where the relevant income is receivable under a trust created by will and such trust is
the only trust so declared by him; and
(c) where the trust is a non-testamentary one created before March 1, 1970 for the
exclusive benefit (to the extent it is not utilised for charitable or religious purposes) o f
relatives of the settler mainly dependent on the settler for their support or maintenance
or where settler is a Hindu undivided family, for the exclusive benefit of its members
so dependent upon it.
Where the relevant income consists of or includes profits and gains of business, the preceding
concessional method of taxation shall apply only if the income is receivable under a trust
declared by any person by will exclusively for the benefit of any relative dependent on him
for support and maintenance and such trust is the only trust so declared by him.
Where the whole or any part of the relevant income is not exempt under section 11 or section
12 because any income thereof is for the benefit of prohibited persons or the rules with regard
to investment in specified channels have not been followed, tax shall be charged on the
relevant income or part of relevant income at the maximum marginal rate.
(3) Taxation of Oral Trusts [Section 164A]: Oral Trust is a trust which is not declared by a
duly executed instrument in writing. As per section 164A, any income which a trustee receives
or is entitled to receive on behalf of or for the benefit of any person under an oral trust will be
chargeable to income tax at the maximum marginal rate.
However, such trust shall be deemed to be a trust declared by a duly executed instrument in
writing if a statement in writing, signed by the trustee or trustees, setting out the purpose or
purposes of the trust, particulars as to the trustee or trustees, the beneficiary or beneficiaries
and the trust property, is forwarded to the Assessing Officer within three months from the
date of declaration of the trust.
(4) Case where part of trust income is chargeable [Section 165]: In cases where only some
portion of the trust’s income to which the beneficiary or beneficiaries is/are entitled is taxable
and the other portion is not taxable, the taxable portion of the income received by him from
the trust as a beneficiary shall be only such portion thereof as bears to the whole income of
the trust. In other words, where a part only of the trust income is chargeable to tax under this
Act, the beneficiaries’ share of the income should be taken to be that derived proportionately
from the chargeable and non-chargeable portions of the trust income.
Exempt Income
The aforesaid categories of income would qualify for exemption provided additional conditions for
availing the benefit of the said section which are as under are met :
Maintains such books of account and other documents to enable the A.O. to properly deduce
its income therefrom
Conditions to be satisfied by political
Maintains a record of each such voluntary contribution (other than electoral bonds) in excess
of ` 20,000 and the name and address of the contributor
Furnishing of return of income for the P.Y. in accordance with section 139(4B)
ILLUSTRATION 16
Explain in the context of provisions of the Act, whether the income derived during the year ended on
31.03.2026 in following case shall be subject to tax in the A.Y. 2026-27:
A political party, duly registered under section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951,
received rent of ` 1,25,000 per month of one of its building let out to a bank from 01.06. 2025.
SOLUTION
Rent received by the political party from the bank is an income chargeable under the head "Income
from house property". However, according to the provisions of section 13A, income from , inter alia,
house property shall not be included in total income of a political party registered under section 29A
of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, provided the political party fulfils the conditions as
specified therein including furnishing a return of income for the previous year in accordance with the
provisions of section 139(4B) on or before the due date under section 139. Therefore, if the stipulated
conditions are fulfilled by the political party, rent of ` 1,25,000 per month received by the registered
political party from letting out of its building to a bank would not be included in its total income .
ILLUSTRATION 17
The books of account maintained by a National Political Party registered with Election Commission
for the year ended on 31.3.2026 discloses the following receipts:
`
(a) Rent of property let out to a departmental store at Chennai 6,00,000
(b) Interest on deposits other than banks 5,00,000
(c) Contribution of ` 21,000 each from 100 persons (who have secreted their 21,00,000
names)
(d) Contribution from 10 persons by way of electoral bonds of ` 25,000 each 2,50,000
(e) Cash contribution @ ` 2,100 each from 1,000 members (recorded in books of 21,00,000
account)
(f) Net profit of cafeteria run in the premises at Delhi 3,00,000
Compute the total income of the political party for the assessment year 2026-27, with reasons for
inclusion or otherwise.
SOLUTION
The total income of a political party registered with the Election Commission is to be computed as
per section 13A under which the income derived from house property, income from other sources
and income by way of voluntary contributions received from any person, on fulfilling of the conditions
as mentioned thereunder, are exempt from tax. However, in this case, since cash contribution in
excess of ` 2,000 is received from 1000 persons, the political party has violated the condition of
receipt of donation through account payee cheque/draft or prescribed electronic modes. Further, the
political party has also violated the condition of maintenance of records in case of donations
exceeding ` 20,000 received otherwise than by way of electoral bonds. Hence, its total income has
to be computed as under without providing for exemption available under section 13A:
Computation of total income of National Political Party
Particulars `
(a) The rent of the property of ` 6 lacs located at Chennai [assuming the same 4,20,000
to be the Gross Annual Value] less 30% of ` 6 lacs, being deduction u/s 24
(b) Interest received on deposits 5,00,000
(c) Contribution from 100 persons (who have secreted their names) of 21,00,000
` 21,000 each
(d) Contribution from 10 persons by way of electoral bonds of ` 25,000 each 2,50,000
(e) Cash contribution @ ` 2,100 each from 1,000 members (recorded in books 21,00,000
of account)
(f) Net profit of cafeteria at Delhi 3,00,000
Total Income 56,70,000
Note – Alternatively, the political party can contend that only ` 45 lakh is taxable on account of non-
maintenance of records and receipt of cash donations, in which case the total income would be
computed as under:
Computation of total income of National Political Party
Particulars `
(a) Rent of the property of ` 6 lacs located at Chennai Exempt
(b) Interest received on deposits Exempt
(c) Contribution from 100 persons (who have secreted their names) of ` 21,000 each 21,00,000
(d) Contribution from 10 persons by way of electoral bonds of ` 25,000 each Exempt
(e) Cash contribution @ ` 2,100 each from 1,000 members (recorded in books 21,00,000
of account)
(f) Net profit of cafeteria at Delhi 3,00,000
Total Income 45,00,000
Note: It is presumed that the conditions regarding maintenance of books of account, audit,
submission of report under section 29C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and filing of
return of income under section 139(4B) are fulfilled by the political party, and hence it is eligible for
exemption of income under section 13A.
(c) amount and mode of contribution including name and branch of the Bank and
date of receipt of such contribution;
(d) name of the electoral trust;
(e) Permanent account number of the electoral trust;
(f) date and number of approval by the prescribed authority; and
(g) Name and designation of the person issuing the receipt.
(iii) The electoral trust shall not accept contributions-
(a) from an individual who is not a citizen of India or from any foreign entity whether
incorporated or not;
(b) from any other electoral trust which has been registered a company under
section 25 of the Companies Act, 19567 and approved as an electoral trust
under the Electoral Trusts Scheme, 2013;
(c) from a Government company as defined in section 2(45) of the Companies Act,
2013; and
(d) from a foreign source as defined in section 2(j) of the Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act, 2010.
(iv) The electoral trust shall accept contributions only by way of an account payee cheque
drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft or by electronic transfer to its bank
account and shall not accept any contribution in cash.
(v) The electoral trust shall not accept any contribution without the PAN of the contributor,
who is a resident and the passport number in the case of a citizen of India, who is not
a resident.
(vi) A political party registered under section 29A of the Representation of the People Act,
1951 shall be an eligible political party and an electoral trust shall distribute funds only
to the eligible political parties.
(vii) (a) The electoral trust may, for the purposes of managing its affairs, spend upto
5% of the total contributions received in a year subject to an aggregate limit of
` 5 lakh in the first year of incorporation and ` 3 lakh in subsequent years;
(b) the total contributions received in any financial year alongwith the surplus from
any earlier financial year, if any, as reduced by the amount spent on managing
its affairs, shall be the distributable contributions for the financial year;
(c) an electoral trust shall be required to distribute the distributable contributions
received in a financial year, referred to in point (b) above, to the eligible political
parties before 31 st March of the said financial year, subject to the condition that
at least 95% of the total contributions received during the financial year along
with the surplus brought forward from earlier financial year, if any, are
distributed.
(viii) The trust shall obtain a receipt from the eligible political party indicating the name of
the political party, its permanent account number, registration number, amount of fund
received from the trust, date of the receipt and name and designation of person signing
such receipt.
(ix) The electoral trust shall not utilize any contributions for the direct or indirect benefit of
the members or contributors, or for any of the following persons, namely:
(a) the members (including members of its Executive Committee, Governing
Committee or Board of Directors) of the electoral trust;
along with the details of the amount and mode of its payment including the
name and branch of the bank.
(xi) Every electoral trust shall get its accounts audited by an accountant as defined in the
Explanation below section 288(2) and furnish the audit report in Form No.10BC along
with particulars forming part of its Annexure, to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the
Director of Income-tax, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the electoral trust,
on or before the due date specified for furnishing the return of income by a company
under section 139.
(xii) An electoral trust shall maintain a regular record of proceedings of all meetings and
decisions taken therein.
(xiii) Every electoral trust shall furnish a certified copy of list of contributors and a list of
political parties, to whom sums were distributed in the manner prescribed in (vii)
above, to the Commissioner of Income-tax or the Director of Income-tax, as the case
may be, every year along with the audit report;
(xiv) Any change in the shareholders, subsequent to the approval granted under the
Electoral Trusts Scheme, 2013 shall be intimated to the Board within thirty days of
such change.
Section 2(22AAA) defines ‘Electoral Trust’ to mean a trust so approved by the CBDT,
in accordance with the scheme made in this regard by the Central Government.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 2(22AAA), the Central Government, has
through Notification No.9/2013 dated 31.1.2013, notified the Electoral Trusts Scheme, 2013
to lay down the procedure for grant of approval to an electoral trust which will receive
voluntary contributions and distribute the same to political parties.
Eligibility
A company registered for the purposes of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 satisfying
all of the following conditions shall be eligible to make an application for approval as an
electoral trust, namely –
1. The company should be registered on or after 1.4.2012 for the purposes of section 25
of the Companies Act, 1956;
2. The name of the company registered for the purposes of section 25 of the Companies
Act, 1956 has to include the phrase “electoral trust”;
3. The sole object of the electoral trust should be to distribute the contributions received
by it to the political party, registered under section 29A of the Representation of the
People Act, 1951;
4. The electoral trust should have a permanent account number.
Criteria for Approval
An electoral trust shall be considered for approval if it fulfills all of the following conditions,
namely –
1. The company registered for the purposes of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956,
which satisfies the above conditions;
2. The object of the electoral trust shall not be to earn any profit or pass any direct or
indirect benefit to its members or contributors, or to any person referred to in section
13(3) or any person referred to in Rule 17CA(10) of the Rules;
3. It has made adequate arrangement for recording the receipts from the contributors in
accordance with Rule 17CA;
4. The stipulations contained in Rule 17CA for functioning of the electoral trust are
specifically included in the articles of association of the company registered for the
purposes of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Renewal of approval
1. The approval shall be valid for the assessment year relevant to the financial year in
which such application has been made and for a further period, not exceeding three
assessment years, as may be specified in the approval.
2. The electoral trust may apply for renewal of approval at any time during the financial
year immediately preceding the last assessment year, for which the approval has been
originally granted, and such renewal of approval may be granted after examining the
application in the same manner as laid out for approval in this scheme.
Withdrawal of approval
1. The CBDT may withdraw the approval granted under this Scheme if it is satisfied that
the electoral trust has ceased its activities or its activities are not genuine or are not
carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions laid down under this Scheme
or the provisions of Rule 17CA of the Rules, or any other condition imposed in the
approval granted.
(4) Nature of income paid or credited by securitisation trust in the hands of the investor
[Section 115TCA(2)]:
The income paid or credited by the securitisation trust shall be deemed to be of the same
nature and in the same proportion in the hands of the investor of the securitisation trust, as if
it had been received by, or had accrued and arisen to, the securitisation trust during the
previous year.
(5) Deemed credit to investor [Section 115TCA(3)]:
If the income accruing or arising to, or received by, the securitisation trust, during a previous
year has not been paid or credited to the investor, the same shall be deemed to have been
credited to the account of the said person on the last day of the previous year in the same
proportion in which such person would have been entitled to receive the income had it b een
paid in the previous year.
(6) Statement specifying the details of nature of income to be furnished to investor and
prescribed income-tax authority [Section 115TCA(4)]:
The securitisation trust shall provide breakup regarding nature and proportion of its income
and such other relevant details to the investors and also to the prescribed income -tax
authority in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner, within the prescribed
period.
(7) Income taxed in the year of accrual not taxable again in the year of payment [Section
115TCA(5)]:
Where income has been included in the total income of the investor in a previous year, on
account of it having accrued or arisen in the said previous year, the same shall not be included
in the total income of such person in the previous year in which such income is actually paid
to him by the securitisation trust.
(8) Deduction of tax at source in respect of income payable to investor [Section 194LBC]:
Tax deduction at source under section 194LBC shall be effected by the securitisation trust at
the time of payment or credit of income to the account of the investor, whichever is earlier.
Where any income as aforesaid is credited to any account in the books of account of the
person liable to pay such income, such crediting is deemed to be credit of such income to the
account of the payee and tax has to be deducted at source. The account to which such income
is credited may be called “Suspense account” or by any other name.
The facility for the investors to obtain low or nil deduction of tax certificate would be available;
the investor can make an application to the Assessing Officer, and he can, on an application
made by the assessee in this behalf, issue a certificate under section 197 in this behalf for
no deduction of income-tax or deduction of income-tax at a lower rate.
(10) Meaning of certain terms:
Explanation Term Meaning
(a) Investor A person who is holder of any securitised debt instrument or
securities, or security receipt issued by the securitisation
trust
(b) Securities Debt securities issued by a Special Purpose Vehicle as
referred to in the guidelines on securitisation of standard
assets issued by RBI
(c) REIT shall invest in commercial real estate assets, on a freehold or leasehold basis,
either directly or through a holdco and/or special purpose vehicles (SPVs). Real estate
for the purpose of REIT Regulations means land and any permanently attached
improvements to it, whether leasehold or freehold and includes buildings, sheds,
garages, fences, fittings, fixtures, warehouses, car parks, etc. and any other assets
incidental to the ownership of real estate but does not include mortgage.
(d) Once registered, the REIT shall raise funds through an initial offer. Subsequent raising
of funds may be through follow-on offer, rights issue, qualified institutional placement,
etc.
(e) Units of REITs shall be mandatorily listed on a recognized Stock Exchange and REIT
shall make continuous disclosures in terms of the listing agreement.
(f) Not less than 80% of the value of the REIT assets shall be invested in completed and
rent and/or income generating properties.
Upto 20% of the value of REIT assets shall be invested in following:
(1) developmental properties, whether directly or through a company or LLP;
(2) mortgage backed securities;
(3) listed/ unlisted debt of companies/body corporates in real estate sector;
(4) equity shares of companies which are listed on a recognized stock exchange
in India which derive not less than 75% of their operating income from Real
Estate activity;
(5) unlisted equity shares of companies which derive not less than 75% of their
operating income from real estate activity
(6) government securities;
(7) unutilized FSI of a project where it has already made investment;
(8) TDR acquired for the purpose of utilization with respect to a project where it
has already made investment;
(9) money market instruments or cash equivalents.
(g) REIT shall distribute not less than 90% of the net distributable cash flows, subject to
applicable laws, to its unitholders, at-least on a half yearly basis.
(h) A REIT shall not invest in units of other REITs.
(3) Likewise, the SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014 (“InvIT Regulations”)
provide a framework for registration and regulation of Infrastructure Investment Trusts (“InvITs”).
(4) The Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 had introduced a special taxation regime for providing the
manner of taxability of –
(i) income in the hands of business trusts; and
(ii) income distributed by such business trusts in the hands of the unit holders.
Section 2(13A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 defines a business trust to mean a trust registered
as an Infrastructure Investment Trust (Invit) under SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts)
Regulations, 2014 or as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under SEBI (Real Estate
Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014.
Chapter XII-FA contains the special provisions relating to business trusts. Section 115UA(1)
provides that any income distributed by a business trust to its unit holders shall be deemed
to be of the same nature and in the same proportion in the hands of the unit holder, as it had
been received by, or accrued to the business trust.
However, as per section 115UA(3A), any sum other than the following components of
income–
(i) interest and dividend (received from SPV and distributed to unit holders)
(ii) rental income from directly owned real estate assets distributed to unitholders
(iii) income chargeable to tax in the hands of the business trust under section 115UA(2)
received by a unit holder from a business trust which is chargeable to tax under section
56(2)(xii) in the hands of unitholders under the head “Income from Other Sources” would not
be deemed to be of same nature. Such sum chargeable to tax under section 56(2)(xii) would
include repayment of debt or amount paid against redemption of units to the unit holders.
- interest or dividend received or receivable from a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). Thus,
the business trust enjoys a pass-through status in respect of interest or dividend
received or receivable from a SPV.
"SPV" means any Indian company, -
(i) in which the REIT holds or proposes to hold not less than 50% of the equity
share capital or interest;
(ii) which holds not less than 80% of its assets directly in properties and does not
invest in other special purpose vehicles; and
(iii) which is not engaged in any activity other than holding and developing property
and any other activity incidental to such holding or development;
(6) Exemption of Rental income of REIT from directly owned real estate asset [Section
10(23FCA)]
Any income of a business trust, being a REIT, by way of renting or leasing or letting out any
real estate asset owned directly by such business trust is exempt in the hands of the business
trust.
(7) Any distributed income referred to in section 115UA received by unit holders is exempt
in their hands under section 10(23FD) to the extent it does not comprise of
- interest referred to in sub-clause (a) of section 10(23FC) (interest income from SPV
distributed to unitholders) or
- dividend income referred to in section 10(23FC)(b) from a special purpose vehicle
which has exercised option under section 115BAA and distributed to unit holders or
- rental income referred to in section 10(23FCA) (rental income from directly owned real
estate assets).
(8) Section 115UA(2) provides that subject to the provisions of sections 111A and 112, the total
income of a business trust shall be chargeable to tax at the maximum marginal rate.
(9) Section 56(2)(xii) provides that any specified sum received by a unit holder from a business
trust during the previous year with respect to unit held by him at any time during the previous
year would be chargeable to tax in the hands of unit holder under the head “ Income from
other sources.
Specified sum is to be computed in the following manner:
Specified sum = A (-) B (-) C (which shall be zero if sum of B and C is greater than A)
A aggregate of sum distributed by the business trust with respect to such unit, during the
previous year or during any earlier previous year or years, to such unit holder, who
holds such unit on the date of distribution of sum or to any other unit holder who held
such unit at any time prior to the date of such distribution, which is -
(a) not in the nature of interest and dividend referred to in section 10(23FC) or
rental income referred to in section 10(23FCA); and
(b) not chargeable to tax in the hands of the business trust under section 115UA(2).
B amount at which such unit was issued by the business trust; and
C amount charged to tax under this clause in any earlier previous year;
(10) Section115UA(3) provides that distributed income or any part thereof, which is in the
nature of
- interest income received by the business trust from the SPV or
- dividend income received or receivable by the business trust from a SPV which has
exercised the option under section 115BAA or
- rental income from real estate assets owned directly by the REIT [referred to in
section 10(23FCA)]
is deemed to be the income of the unit holder in the previous year of distribution and subject
to tax in the hands of the unit holder in that year.
(11) Any person responsible for making payment of income distributed on behalf of the business
trust to a unit holder is required to furnish a statement to the unit holder and the prescribed
authority within the prescribed time.
The statement should be in the prescribed form and manner. It should contain the particulars
of the nature of income paid during the previous year as well as the other details as may be
prescribed [Section 115UA(4)].
(12) Under section 139(4E), a business trust is mandatorily required to furnish a return of its
income or loss in every previous year. All the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 would
apply as if it were a return required to be furnished under section 139(1 ).
(13) The scheme of taxability of income in the hands of the business trust, unit holders, sponsors
etc. is briefed in the table given hereunder –
Transaction Section Tax and TDS implications
(1) Transfer of Tax implications in the hands of unit
listed units of holders:
the business ➢ STT leviable on trading of listed units on a
trust by the unit recognized stock exchange.
holders
2(42A) ➢ The period of holding of units of business
trust to qualify as “long-term capital
assets” is “more than 12 months”.
8 On harmonious interpretation of law and on the principle that in case of non-resident, the TDS rates should not be
less than the tax rates, distributed income, being dividend would be taxable @10%. However, on independent
reading of section 115A, it is possible to take a view that the tax rate for such dividend income is 20%.
ILLUSTRATION 18
A business trust, registered under SEBI (Real Estate Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014, gives
particulars of its income for the P.Y.2025-26:
(1) Interest income from Beta Ltd. – ` 4 crore;
(2) Dividend income from Beta Ltd. – ` 2 crore;
(3) Short-term capital gains on sale of listed shares of Beta Ltd.– ` 1.5 crore;
(4) Short-term capital gains on sale of developmental properties – ` 1 crore
(5) Interest received from investments in unlisted debentures of real estate companies – ` 10 lakh;
(6) Rental income from directly owned real estate assets – ` 2.50 crore
Beta Ltd. is an Indian company in which the business trust holds 70% of the shareholding.
Discuss the tax consequences of the above income earned by the business trust in the hands of the
business trust and the unit holders, assuming that the business trust has distributed ` 10 crore to
the unit holders in the P.Y.2025-26 (Assume that Beta Ltd. does not opt to pay tax under section
115BAA).
SOLUTION
Tax consequences in the hands of the business trust and its unit holders
(1) Interest income of ` 4 crore from Beta Ltd.: There would be no tax liability in the hands of
business trust due to pass-through status enjoyed by it under sub-clause (a) of section
10(23FC) in respect of interest income from Beta Ltd., being the special purpose vehicle.
Therefore, Beta Ltd. is not required to deduct tax at source on interest payment to the
business trust.
The distributed income or any part thereof, received by a unit holder from the REIT, which is
in the nature of interest income received or receivable from a SPV is deemed income of the
unit holder as per section 115UA(3).
The business trust has to deduct tax at source under section 194LBA –
- @ 10%, on interest component of income distributed to resident unit holders; and
- @ 5%, on interest component of income distributed to non-corporate non-resident and
foreign companies’ unit holders.
The interest component of income received from the business trust in the hands of each
unitholder would be determined in the proportion of 4/11.1, by virtue of section 115UA(1).
(2) Dividend income of ` 2 crore from Beta Ltd.: The dividend distributed by the SPV to the
business trust is exempt by virtue of section 10(23FC). Any distributed income referred to in
section 115UA, which is in the nature of dividend income received or receivable from SPV, in
a case where the SPV has exercised the option under section 115BAA, is taxable in the hands
of unitholders by virtue of section 10(23FD). However, since Beta Ltd., being a SPV does not
opt for section 115BAA, dividend component is exempt in the hands of the unitholders.
Consequently, business trust is not required to deduct tax at source on the dividend
component distributed to the unitholders.
(3) Short-term capital gains of ` 1.50 crore on sale of listed shares of Beta Ltd.: As per
section 115UA(2), the business trust is liable to pay tax@20% under section 111A in respect
of short-term capital gains on sale of listed shares of special purpose vehicle. There would,
however, be no tax liability on the capital gain component of income distributed to unit
holders, by virtue of the exemption contained in section 10(23FD).
(4) Short-term capital gains of ` 1 crore on sale of developmental properties: It is taxable
at maximum marginal rate in the hands of the business trust as per section 115UA(2). There
would be no tax liability in the hands of the unit holders on the capital gain component of
income distributed to them, by virtue of the exemption contained in section 10(23FD).
(5) Interest of ` 10 lakh received in respect of investment in unlisted debentures of real
estate companies: Such interest is taxable at maximum marginal rate, in the hands of the
business trust, as per section 115UA(2). However, there would be no tax liability in the hands
of the unit holders on the interest component of income distributed to them, by virtue of
section 10(23FD).
(6) Rental income of ` 2.50 crore from directly owned real estate assets: Any income of a
business trust, being a REIT, by way of renting or leasing or letting out any real estate asset owned
directly by such business trust is exempt in the hands of the trust as per section 10(23FCA).
Where the income by way of rent is credited or paid to a business trust, being a REIT, in
respect of any real estate asset held directly by such REIT, no tax is deductible at source
under section 194-I.
The distributed income or any part thereof, received by a unit holder from the REIT, which is in
the nature of income by way of renting or leasing or letting out any real estate asset owned
directly by such REIT is deemed income of the unit holder as per section 115UA(3). The
business trust has to deduct tax at source@10% under section 194LBA in case of distribution
to a resident unit holder and at rates in force in case of distribution to a non-resident unit holder.
The rental income component received from the business trust in the hands of each unitholder
would be determined in the proportion of 2.5/11.1, by virtue of section 115UA(1).
Note – Accordingly, income in the hands of the non-resident investor from offshore
investments routed through Category I or Category II AIFs, being a deemed direct investment
outside India by the non-resident investor, is not taxable in India under section 5(2) of the Act
[Circular No. 14/2019, dated 3.7.2019].
(2) Exemption of income of investment fund other than income under the head profits and
gains from business and profession [Section 10(23FBA)]
The Scheme provides for exemption of income, other than income chargeable under the head
“Profits and gains of business or profession”, in the hands of investment fund. The income in
the nature of profits and gains of business or profession shall be taxable in the hands of the
investment fund.
(3) Exemption to unit holder of income under the head “Profits and gains from business
or profession” of investment fund [Section 10(23FBB)]
Income accruing or arising to, or received by, a unit holder of an investment fund, being that
proportion of income which is of the same nature as income chargeable under the head
“Profits and gains of business or profession” at investment fund level, shall be exempt under
section 10(23FBB). This implies that all income from investment fund is taxable in the hands
of unit holders except income under the head “PGBP”.
(4) TDS in respect of income of units of investment fund to unit holders [Section 194LBB]
Investment fund to deduct tax at source on any income (other than the proportion of income
which is of the same nature as income chargeable under the head “Profits and gains of
business or profession” which is taxable at investment fund level) payable by the investment
fund to a unit holder
Note – By implication, losses other than those referred to in (i) and (ii) above, which cannot
be wholly set-off against current year income, would be passed on to the unit holders to be
carry forward and set-off in their individual hands in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter VI.
(6) Pass through status for losses accumulated as on 31.3.2019:
Losses, other than loss under the head “profits and gains from business or profession”, if any,
accumulated at the level of investment fund as on 31.3.2019, shall be
- deemed to be the loss of a unit holder who held the unit as on 31.3.2019 in respect of
the investment made by him in the investment fund in the same manner as it were the
loss incurred by him had he made such investments directly and
- shall be allowed to be passed through to the investors for the remaining period
calculated from the year in which the loss has occurred for the first time taking that
year as the first year and set off against their income in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter VI.
Further, such accumulated losses shall not be available to the investment fund on or after
1.4.2019.
(7) Nature of income in the hands of unitholders:
The income paid or credited by the investment fund shall be deemed to be of the same nature
and in the same proportion in the hands of the unit holder as if it had been received by, or
had accrued or arisen to, the investment fund during the previous year . [Section 115UB(3)].
(8) Tax on total income:
As per section 115UB(4), the total income of the investment fund is chargeable to tax as
follows:
Investment Fund Rate of tax
A company or a firm Rate or rates specified in the Finance Act of the
relevant year (30%/25%, as the case may be, for a
company and 30% for firm for A.Y.2026-27)
Other than a company or a firm Maximum marginal rate
If the income accruing or arising to, or received by, an investment fund, during a previous
year is not paid or credited to the unitholders, it shall be deemed to have been credited to the
account of the unit-holder on the last day of the previous year in the same proportion in which
such person would have been entitled to receive the income had it been paid in the previous
year [Section 115UB(6)].
Income taxed in the year of accrual not taxable again in the year of payment [ Explanation 2
below section 115UB]:
It has been clarified that any income which has been included in the total income of the unit
holder of an investment fund in a previous year, on account of it having accrued or arisen in
the said previous year, would not be included in his total income in the previous year in which
such income is actually paid to him by the investment fund.
(10) Summary:
The following table gives a summary of the above provisions:
Particulars Investment Fund Unit holder
(i) Income under the head Taxable Exempt
“Profits and gains of
business or profession” of
the Investment Fund
(ii) Income, other than profits Exempt. Taxable, as if he had
and gains of business or Tax to be deducted on directly made the
profession such income distributed investment.
to unitholders
- @10%, in case of
resident payee
- at rates in force in
case of non-resident
payee
(iii) Loss under the head To be carried forward for Not passed on to
“Profits and gains of set-off as per Chapter VI investors
business or profession” at the Fund level
incurred by the investment
fund
(iv) Loss (other than loss The Act is silent relating Not allowed to be
referred to in (iii) above) to the permissibility or carried forward by the
where such loss has arisen otherwise of carry unitholder. He cannot
in respect of unit which has forward of these losses in set-off such losses
not been held by the unit the hands of investment against his income.
holder for a period of at- funds.
least 12 months
(v) Losses (other than losses Not allowed to be carried Unit-holder can carry
referred to in (iii) and (iv) forward for set-off by the forward and set-off
above) remaining after set- Investment Fund such losses against his
off against current year income as per Chapter
income. VI
Note – Losses, other than business losses, accumulated at the level of the investment fund
as on 31.3.2019 would be deemed to be the loss of the unit holder who held the unit as on
31.3.2019 in respect of the investments made by him in the investment fund, in the same
manner as it were the loss incurred by him had he made such investments directly. Such
loss can be carried forward by the unitholder for the remaining period calculated from the
year in which the loss had occurred for the first time taking that year as the first year.
Accordingly, he can set-off such loss in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VI. The
loss so deemed to be the loss of the unitholder shall not be available to the investment fund
on or after 1.4.2019.
(11) Statement to be furnished:
The person responsible for crediting or making payment of the income on behalf of an
investment fund and the investment fund are required to furnish, within the prescribed time,
to the person who is liable to tax in respect of such income and to the presc ribed income-tax
authority, a statement in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner. Such
statement should give details of the nature of the income paid or credited during the previous
year and such other relevant details as may be prescribed [Section 115UA(7)].
(12) Every investment fund has to compulsorily file its return of income or loss under section
139(4F), if it is not required to do so under any other provision of section 139. The provisions
of the Act would apply as if such return of income or loss were a re turn required to be
furnished under section 139(1).
(13) Meaning of certain terms:
Term Meaning
(a) Investment fund Any fund established or incorporated in India in the form of a
trust or a company or a limited liability partnership or a body
corporate which has been granted a certificate of registration
as a Category I or a Category II Alternative Investment Fund
and is regulated under the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (Alternative Investment Fund) Regulations, 2012, made
under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or
regulated under the International Financial Services Centers
Authority (Fund Management) Regulations, 2022 made
ILLUSTRATION 19
The following are the particulars of income of four investment funds for P.Y.2025-26:
Particulars A B C D
` in lakh
Business Income 2 (2) 5
Capital Gains 16 14 (6) 20
Income from other sources 4 4 8 (2)
Compute the total income of the investment funds and each unitholder for A.Y. 2026-27, assuming
that:
(1) each investment fund has 20 unitholders each having one unit held by them for a period
exceeding 24 months; and
(2) income from investment in the investment fund is the only income of the unitholder.
If Investment Fund C has the following income components for A.Y.2027-28, what would be the total
income of the fund and the unit holder for that year?
Business Income ` 2 lakh
Capital Gains ` 9 lakh
Income from Other Sources ` 8 lakh.
SOLUTION
Computation of total income of the investment fund for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars A B C D
`
Business Income Nil 2,00,000 Nil 3,00,000
Total Income Nil 2,00,000 Nil 3,00,000
Notes:
(i) The total income of Investment Fund B would be chargeable to tax @30% if the fund is a firm
and @30%/25%, as the case may, if the fund is a company and at the maximum marginal
rate, in any other case.
(ii) In case of Investment Fund D, the loss from other sources ` 2 lakh is set-off against business
income of ` 5 lakh.
(iii) In case of Investment Fund C, the business loss of ` 2 lakh is set-off against income from
other sources of ` 8 lakh. Loss of ` 6 lakh under the head “Capital gains” cannot be set-off
against income under any other head. The same can be carried forward by the Unitholder for
set-off in the subsequent years since, the units are held for a period of 12 months or more.
For A.Y. 2027-28, brought forward capital loss of ` 30,000 [` 6 lakh/20] can be set-off against
capital gains of ` 45,000 [` 9 lakh/20] by the unit-holder since, the period of holding of units
is 24 months or more. Business income of ` 2 lakh would be taxable in the hands of the
Investment Fund. Income from other sources of ` 40,000 (` 8 lakh/20) would be taxable in
the hands of the unitholders.
1 New Noble Educational Society v. CCIT (2022) 448 ITR 594 (SC)
Questions
1. A trust, unless created for "charitable purpose", does not qualify to claim exemption under
Chapter III of the Act. In this context, explain the meaning of "charitable purpose" and
examine whether the following objects constitute part of it:
(i) Rural reconstruction and upliftment of the masses through Cottage Industry.
(ii) Welfare of industrial workers with a stipulation that the workers of settlor of trust have
got preference over others.
2. Ramji Charitable Trust has filed return of income for the Assessment Year 2026-27 in
December 2026 and applied only 50% of its income for specified purposes. It intends to
accumulate the balance 35% of income to be spent in future years. Accordingly, it filed its
Statement in Form 10 in August, 2026 and deposited the money so accumulated in post office
savings bank account. While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer disallowed
the accumulated income of 35% and taxed the same on the ground that the trust has filed its
return of income after the due date for filing return of income. Discuss the validity of the action
of the Assessing Officer in this case.
3. An institution operating for promotion of education claiming exemption under section 11 since
1994 furnishes the following data for the assessment year 2026-27:
S. No. Particulars ` in crores
(i) Fees collected from students 14
(ii) Construction of a new computer science laboratory 0.50
(iii) Land acquired to be used as a cricket field for the students 2
(iv) Amount earmarked and set apart for construction of an arts 4
block within the next 4 years.
The trust applied a sum of ` 11.60 lacs towards charitable purposes during the year which
includes repayment of loan taken for construction of orphanage ` 3.60 lacs. The entire
expenditure incurred on construction of orphanage was allowed as application of income in
the P.Y. 2020-21.
Determine the taxable income of the trust for the assessment year 2026-27.
5. Work out, from the following particulars, the amount of capital gain which shall be deemed to
have been applied for charitable or religious purpose arising out of sale of a capital asset
utilized for the purposes of trust to the extent of 60%:
Particulars `
Cost of transferred asset 2,40,000
Sale consideration 3,60,000
Cost of new asset purchased 3,00,000
6. An electoral trust approved by the CBDT is not liable to income-tax in respect of voluntary
contribution received and other income - Examine the correctness of the statement.
7. Helpage is a charitable trust set up on 1.4.2010 with the object of providing relief to the poor.
Later on, in April, 2012, it changed its object to medical relief. It applied for registration on
the basis of its new object, i.e., medical relief, on 1.9.2012 and was granted registration under
Section 12AA on 1.2.2013.
On 1.4.2025, Helpage got merged with Poor Aid, is not eligible for registration under section
12AB or approval under section 10(23C). All the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile trust
became the assets and liabilities of Poor Aid. The trust appointed a registered valuer for the
valuation of its assets and liabilities. From the following particulars (including the valuation
report), calculate the tax liability in the hands of the trust arising as a result of such merger:
(i) Land
Location Date of Stamp Value which the land Book
purchase duty value would fetch, if sold in Value on
on the open market on 1.4.2025
1.4.2025 1.4.2025
` ` `
Noida 1.9.2010 55 lakhs 58 lakhs 50 lakhs
Gurgaon 1.9.2013 100 lakhs 120 lakhs 110 lakhs
(ii) Shares
Type of shares Date of Face Purchase Price at which Open
purchase value of price of each share is market
each each quoted on BSE as value as
share share on 1.4.2025 on
Highest Lowest 1.4.2025#
price price
` ` ` ` `
5000 Quoted 1.5.2014 100 110 320 300
equity shares of A
Ltd.
2000 Preference 1.9.2015 100 100 - - 180
shares of B Ltd.
# on the basis of report of Merchant Banker
(iii) Liabilities
Book value of liabilities on 1.4.2025 = ` 120 lakhs. This includes –
(a) Corpus fund ` 12 Lakhs.
(b) Provision for taxation ` 8 lakhs; and
(c) Reserves and Surplus ` 18 lakhs
8. “Serving the poor”, a charitable trust, is registered under section 12AB of the Act. On
1.4.2025, it got merged with another entity not eligible for registration under section 12AB or
approval under section 10(23C).
All the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile trust became the assets and liabilities of the
merged entity.
The trust appointed a registered valuer for the valuation of its assets and liabilities. From the
following particulars (including the valuation report), calculate the tax liability in the hands of
the trust arising as a result of such merger:
(i) Stamp duty value of land held ` 15 lakhs. However, if this land is sold in the open
market, it would ordinarily fetch ` 17 lakhs. The book value of the land is ` 20 lakhs.
(ii) 75,000 equity shares in Ink Ltd. traded in Delhi Stock Exchange. The lowest price per
share on 1.4.2025 was ` 75 and the highest price on that day was ` 85. The book
value was ` 67 lakhs.
(iii) 55,000 preference shares held in N Ltd. The shares will fetch ` 44 lakhs, if they are
sold in the open market on 1.4.2025 Book value was ` 25 Lakhs.
(iv) Corpus fund as on 1.4.2025 ` 15 Lakhs.
(v) Outside liabilities ` 90 lakhs
(vi) Provision for taxation ` 5 lakhs.
(vii) Liabilities in respect of payment of various utility bills ` 6 lakhs.
Answers
1. Section 2(15) defines “charitable purpose” to include relief of the poor, education, medical
relief, yoga, preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and
preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest and the
advancement of any other object of general public utility. However, “advancement of any
other object of general public utility” would not be a charitable purpose, if it involves carrying
on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business or, any activity of rendering of
any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a fee or cess or any other
consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application of the income from such activity
or the retention of such income, by the concerned entity.
“Advancement of any other object of general public utility” would continue to be a “charitable
purpose”, if the total receipt from any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business,
or any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business does
not exceed 20% of the total receipts of the trust in the previous year, and such activity is
undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object of
general public utility.
(i) The Supreme Court has, in Thiagarajar Charities vs. Addl. CIT (1997) 225 ITR 1010,
observed that “cottage industry” is associated with the idea of a small, simple
enterprise or industry in which employees work in their own houses or in a small place,
gathered together for the purpose, using their own equipments and is usually found in
rural areas or so carried on, by the poorer section of the society. In substance, the
activity of rural reconstruction and upliftment of masses through cottage industry is to
afford relief to the poor and consequently, it is for charitable purpose.
(ii) The welfare of industrial workers with a stipulation that the workers of settl or of trust
have preference over others would also constitute “charitable purpose” within the
meaning of section 2(15). The Patna High Court has, in CIT v. Tata Steel Charitable
Trust (1993) 203 ITR 764, observed that exemption under section 11(1) can be availed
only if the following conditions are satisfied –
(1) the trust is created for a charitable purpose; and
(2) no part of the income of such trust enures or has been used or applied directly
or indirectly for the benefit of any person referred to in section 13(3).
The list of persons contained in section 13(3) does not include employees of the settlor
of the trust. Section 13(3)(d), which includes any relative of the author, can have no
application because “relative” means a person connected by birth or marriage wit h
another person. A person having relationship pursuant to a contract like that of an
employer and an employee cannot be said to be a relative. The High Court concluded
that it was immaterial that any employee of the settler of the trust had acquired any
benefit out of the income of the trust as an ordinary member of the community.
Therefore, the application of part of the income of the trust for the benefit of the
employees of the settler cannot disentitle the trust from claiming exemption under
section 11.
2. Section 11(2) provides that a charitable trust has to apply 85% of its income to charitable
purposes and where 85% of its income is not applied for such purposes, the trust may
accumulate or set apart either the whole or part of its income for future application for such
purposes in India. The requirement of the Act is that the trust has to make an
application/intimation in the prescribed form, for accumulation of income, specifying the
purpose and the period (not exceeding 5 years). The application should be filed or furnished
before the assessing authority two months prior to the due date specified under section
139(1). Further, the money so set apart or accumulated should be invested/deposited in any
one or more of these modes or forms specified under section 11(5).
In case the statement in Form 10 is submitted in August, 2026 and the amount accumulated
was deposited in post office savings bank account, which is a mode specified in section 11(5).
However, the benefit of accumulation would not be available if the return of income is not
furnished on or before the due date of filing of return of income under section 139(1). In this
case, trust has not filed its return on or before the due date under section 139(1). The return
of income was filed only in December, 2026. Therefore, the action of the Assessing Officer,
in this case, is valid.
Notes:
(1) The institution must utilise 85% of its income within the previous year for the objects
of the institution. The institution can apply its income either for revenue expenditure or
for capital expenditure provided the expenditure is incurred for promoting the objects
of the institution. Land acquired and meant for use as cricket field for students is a
capital expenditure incurred for promoting the objects of the institution and hence ,
eligible for deduction. Likewise, the amount spent on construction of computer science
laboratory is also eligible for deduction.
(2) Section 11(2) provides that a trust/institution can accumulate or set apart its income
for a specified purpose by furnishing statement in prescribed format to the concerned
Assessing Officer. However, the period for which the funds can be accumulated cannot
exceed 5 years. The amount so accumulated should be invested in the forms and
modes specified in section 11(5). In this case, the institution has to furnish statement
in Form 10 two months prior to the due date of filing return of income to the Assessing
Officer, stating the purpose for which the income is being accumulated or set apart
and the period for which the income is being accumulated or set apart, which shall, in
no case, exceed five years. Further, the institution has to invest ` 4 crore in the
specified forms and modes.
Note – Section 11(2) stipulates the conditions for accumulation, on fulfillment of which the
income so accumulated or set apart would not be included in the total income of the
previous year of the trust. The condition stipulated in clause (c) of Section 11(2) is that
the statement in Form 10 has to be furnished at least 2 months prior to the due date of
filing of return of income u/s 139(1). However, as per section 13(9), the income
accumulated would not be excluded from total income if Form 10 is not submitted on or
before the due date under section 139(1). Section 13(9) permits exclusion of accumulated
income from total income of the previous year, if Form 10 is filed on or before the due date
under section 139(1). CBDT Circular No.6/2023 dated 24.5.2023 clarifies that the
statement of accumulation in Form No. 10 is required to be furnished at least two months
prior to the due date of furnishing return of income so that it may be taken into account
while auditing the books of account. However, the accumulation/deemed application shall
not be denied to a trust as long as the statement of accumulation/deemed application is
furnished on or before the due date of furnishing the return as provided in section 139(1).
4. Computation of taxable income of public charitable trust
Particulars `
(i) Income from property held under trust (net) 10,00,000
(ii) Income (net) from business (incidental to main objects) 4,00,000
(iii) Voluntary contributions from public 7,00,000
Voluntary contribution made with a specific direction towards corpus
are alone to be excluded under section 11(1)(d). In this case, there is
no such direction and hence, included.
21,00,000
Less: 15% of the income eligible for retention / accumulation without 3,15,000
any conditions
17,85,000
Less: Amount applied for the objects of the trust
(i) Amount spent for charitable purposes (` 11,60,000 - 8,00,000
` 3,60,000)
(ii) Repayment of loan for construction of orphan home (See Note -
below)
Taxable Income 9,85,000
Note - As per Explanation 4(ii) to section 11(1), any application for charitable or religious
purposes, from any loan or borrowing in the concerned year, shall not be treated as
application of income for charitable or religious purposes. However, the amount not so treated
as application, shall be treated as application in the year in which the loan is repaid. The
Fourth proviso to Explanation 4(ii) to section 11(1) clarifies that this provision will, however,
not apply where application is from loan or borrowing made on or before 31.3.2021.
Since the amount spent on construction of orphanage was allowed as deduction in the P.Y.
2020-21, repayment of loan taken for such purposes will not be allowed as application as it
would tantamount to double deduction.
5. In this case, since the asset which is transferred is utilized for the purposes of the trust only
to the extent of 60%, only the proportionate amount (i.e., 60%) of the capital gain would be
regarded as having been applied for charitable or religious purposes.
As per section 11(1A), where a capital asset held under trust is transferred, and only a part
of the net consideration is utilized for acquiring a new capital asset, only so much of the
capital gain as is equal to the amount, if any, by which the amount so utilized exceeds the
cost of the transferred asset shall be considered to have been applied for the objects of the
trust.
In this case, only a part of the net consideration of ` 3,60,000 is utilized for acquiring the new
capital asset costing ` 3,00,000. The amount utilized in acquiring the new asset
(i.e., ` 3,00,000) exceeds the cost of the transferred asset (i.e., ` 2,40,000) by ` 60,000.
Therefore, only 60% of (` 3,00,000 – ` 2,40,000) = 60% of ` 60,000 = ` 36,000 is deemed
to be applied for the objects of the trust.
6. Section 13B provides exemption in respect of voluntary contribution received by an electoral
trust approved by the CBDT in accordance with the scheme to be made by the Central
Government.
Voluntary contribution received by an electoral trust would be treated as its income under
section 2(24), but shall be exempt under section 13B if the trust distributes to a registered
political party during the year, 95% of the aggregate donations receive d by it during the year
along with surplus brought forward from any earlier years. Another condition for availing the
benefit under this section is that the electoral trust should function in accordance with the
rules framed by the Central Government.
It may be noted that the exemption under section 13B will be available only in respect of
voluntary contribution received by an electoral trust. The exemption cannot be claimed in
respect of any other income of the electoral trust.
Therefore, the given statement is not correct.
7. As per section 115TD, the accreted income of “Helpage”, a charitable trust, registered under
section 12AA which is merged with Poor Aid, an entity not entitled for registration under
section 12AB or approval under section 10(23C), would be chargeable to tax at the rate of
34.944% [30% plus surcharge @12% plus cess@4%].
Computation of accreted income and tax liability in the hands of the Helpage trust
arising as a result of merger with Poor Aid
Particulars Amount (`)
Aggregate FMV of total assets as on 1.4.2025, being the specified date 1,39,10,000
(date of merger) [See Working Note 1]
Less: Total liability computed in accordance with the prescribed method of
valuation [See Working Note 2] 82,00,000
Accreted Income 57,10,000
Tax Liability @ 34.944% of ` 57,10,000 (rounded off) 19,95,300
Working Notes:
(1) Aggregate fair market value of total assets on the date of merger
- Land at Noida, being immovable property, purchased on 1.9.2010 -
Since the trust was registered only on 1.2.2013 and benefit of section
11 and 12 was available to the trust only from A.Y.2013-14, relevant
to P.Y.2012-13, being the previous year in which the application for
registration is made, the value of land purchased in P.Y.2010-11, in
respect of which benefit under sections 11 and 12 was not availed,
has to be ignored for computing accreted income.
- Land at Gurgaon, being an immovable property, purchased on 1,20,00,000
1.9.2013
[The fair market value of land would be higher of ` 120 lakhs i.e.,
price that the land would ordinarily fetch if sold in the open market
and ` 100 lakhs, being stamp duty value as on the specified date,
i.e., 1.4.2025]
- Quoted equity shares of A Ltd. [5,000 x ` 310 per share] 15,50,000
[` 310 per share, being the average of the lowest (` 300) and highest
price (` 320) of such shares on the specified date]
- Preference shares of B Ltd. [2,000 x ` 180 per share]
[The fair market value which it would fetch if sold in the open market
on the specified date i.e., FMV on 1.4.2025] 3,60,000
1,39,10,000
(2) Total liability
- Reserves and Surplus ` 18 lakhs [not includible] -
- Corpus Fund of ` 12 lakhs [not includible] -
- Provision for taxation ` 8 lakhs [not includible] -
- Other Liabilities
[` 120 lakhs - ` 18 lakhs - ` 12 lakhs - ` 8 lakhs] 82,00,000
82,00,000
8. As per section 115TD, the accreted income of “Serving the poor”, a charitable trust, registered
under section 12AA which merged with an entity not entitled for registration under section
12AB or approval under section 10(23C), would be chargeable to tax at maximum marginal
rate @ 34.944% [30% plus surcharge @12% plus cess@4%].
Computation of accreted income and tax liability in the hands of the trust arising as a
result of merger with the “not eligible” entity for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars Amount (`)
Aggregate FMV of total assets as on 1.4.2025, being the specified date 1,21,00,000
(date of merger) [See Working Note 1]
Less: Total liability computed in accordance with the prescribed method
of valuation [See Working Note 2] 96,00,000
Accreted Income 25,00,000
Tax Liability @ 34.944% of ` 25,00,000 8,73,600
Working Notes:
(1) Aggregate fair market value of total assets on the date of
merger
- Land, being an immovable property 17,00,000
[The fair market value of land would be higher of ` 17 lakhs i.e.,
price that the land would ordinarily fetch if sold in the open market
and ` 15 lakhs, being stamp duty value as on the specified date]
- Quoted equity shares in Ink Ltd. [75,000 x ` 80 per share] 60,00,000
[` 80 per share, being the average of the lowest (` 75) and highest
price (` 85) of such shares on the date of merger]
- 55,000 preference shares of N Ltd.
[The fair market value which it would fetch if sold in the open market
on the date of merger i.e., FMV on 1.4.2025] 44,00,000
1,21,00,000
(2) Total liability
- Outside liabilities 90,00,000
- Corpus Fund of ` 15 lakhs [not includible] -
- Provision for taxation ` 5 lakhs [not includible] -
- Liabilities in respect of payment of various utility bills [since this
liability is an ascertained liability] 6,00,000
96,00,000
TAX PLANNING,
TAX AVOIDANCE
AND TAX EVASION
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you would be able to -
❑ examine the doctrine of form and substance in the context of tax planning;
❑ analyse the provisions of General Anti-avoidance Rules (GAAR)
❑ examine the applicability of General Anti-avoidance Rules (GAAR) vis-a-
vis Specific Anti-avoidance Rules (SAAR)
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
the deal. Otherwise, one may be caught unwittingly in huge tax liability. Planning from the point of
view of taxation helps in generating greater savings of investible surplus.
Tax planning may be defined as an arrangement of one’s financial affairs in such a way that, without
violating in any way the legal provisions, full advantage is taken of all tax exemptions, deductions,
concessions, rebates, allowances and other reliefs or benefits permitted under the Act so that the
burden of taxation on the assessee is reduced to the minimum.
It involves arranging one’s financial affairs by intelligently anticipating the effects which the tax laws
will have on the arrangements now being adopted. As such it is a very stimulating intellectual
exercise.
Any tax planning scheme should be a natural one and should not give an appearance of an artificial
arrangement on the face of it. The tax planner or the tax adviser should exercise great care and
caution in designing any tax planning scheme as its failure will result in great difficulties and heavy
burden of tax on the assessee for whom the scheme is evolved.
In relation to income-tax, the following may be noted as illustrative instances of tax-planning
measures:
(a) Varying the residential status taking into consideration the number of days of stay in India to
be a resident, in case of an individual.
(b) Choosing the suitable form of assessable entity (Individual, HUF, Firm, Co-operative society,
Association of persons, Company, Trust, etc. to obtain optimal tax concessions) .
(c) Exercising the option to shift out of default regime under section 115BAC and paying tax as
per the normal provisions of Income-tax law in case of Individual, HUF, AOPs or BOI.
(d) Exercising the option to pay tax as per concessional tax regimes under section 115BAA or
115BAB in case of corporate assessee subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and
non-allowability of certain exemptions or deductions.
(c) Choosing suitable forms of investment (share capital, loan capital, lease, mortgages, tax
exempt investments, priority sector, etc.), considering deductions available in respect of
interest or dividend etc.
(d) Programmed replacement of assets to take advantage of the provisions governing
depreciation.
(e) Programmed sale of capital assets depending upon the period of holding and deductions
specifically available for assets held for long term.
(f) Diversification of the business activities (hotel industry, agro-based industry etc.) considering
the various profit-linked and investment-linked benefits available under the provisions of the
Act.
(g) The use of the concept of commercial expediency to claim deduction in respect of
expenditure, in computing business income.
(2) Tax planning, tax evasion and tax avoidance: Three methods of reducing taxes have
been developed in most countries of the world over a period of time.
• Tax planning
Methods of reducing taxes • Tax evasion
• Tax avoidance
The dividing line between tax evasion and tax avoidance is very thin. The Direct Taxes Enquiry
Committee (Wanchoo Committee) has tried to draw a distinction between the two items in the
following words.
“The distinction between ‘evasion’ and ‘avoidance’, therefore, is largely dependent on the difference
in methods of escape resorted to.
Tax avoidance
• Between two extremes
i.e., tax planning and tax
Tax evasion evasion, a vast domain
• Manoeuvre involving an for selecting a variety of
element of deceit, methods which, though
Tax Planning misrepresentation of technically satisfying the
• Availing tax exemptions facts, falsification of requirements of law, in
or tax privileges offered accounting calculations fact, circumvent it with a
by the Government, or downright fraud. In view to eliminate or
strictly in accordance simple terms, tax evasion reduce tax burden.
with law. refers to any attempt to
avoid payment of taxes
by using illegal means.
as such, the doctrine did not compel the court to look at the document or transaction in blinkers
isolated from any context to which it properly belonged. If it could be seen that a document or
transaction was intended to have effect as a part of a nexus or series of transactions or as an
ingredient of a wider transaction intended as a whole, there was nothing in the doctrine to prevent it
being so regarded. To do so was not to prefer form to substance or substance to form. It was the
task of the court to ascertain the legal nature of any transaction to which it was sought to attach a
tax consequence and if that emerged from a series or combination of transactions, intended, apart
as such, as was that series or combination which might be regarded.
Thus, two points were established. The first was a significant change in the approach adopted by
the court with regard to its judicial role towards tax avoidance scheme. The second was that it was
crucial when considering any such scheme to take the analysis far enough to determine where the
profit, gain or loss was really to be found. It was also stated that the fact that the court accepted
that each step in a transaction was a genuine step producing its intended legal results did not confine
the court to consider each step in isolation for the purpose of assessing the fiscal results. Thus, we
can say that the true principle of the decision in Ramsey was that the fiscal consequence of a
preordained series of transactions intended to operate as such, are generally to be ascertained by
considering the result of the series as a whole and not by dissecting the scheme and considering
each transaction separately.
In I.R.C. vs. Burmah Shell Co. Ltd. (1982) STC 30 (Burmah) and Furniss (Inspector of Taxes) vs.
Dawson (1984) 1 All E.R.530, it was held that where tax avoidance was targeted through a series
of transactions with no commercial or substantial value but with the only aim of avoiding tax, the
Courts have to ignore the transactions and the tax liability has to be determined as if these
transactions never took place.
Indian Scenario: In CIT vs. A. Raman & Co. 1 SCR 10, the Supreme Court followed the dictum of
the Westminster’s case. It observed that avoidance of tax liability by so arranging commercial affairs
that charge of tax is distributed is not prohibited. The taxpayer may resort to a device to divert the
income before it accrues or arises to him. Effectiveness of the device depends not upon
consideration of morality but on the operation of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Legislative injunction in
taxing statutes may not, except on pain of penalty, be violated but it may lawfully be circumvented.
The same view was expressed in CIT vs. Kharwar (1969) 72 ITR 603 (SC) as follows:
“The taxing authority is entitled and is indeed bound to determine the true legal relation resulting
from a transaction, if the parties have chosen to conceal by a device the legal relation, it is open for
the taxing authorities to unravel the device and to determine the true character of relationship. The
legal effect of a transaction, however, cannot be displaced by probing into the substance of the
transaction.”
However, the Supreme Court in Mc Dowell’s case clearly departed from the above views and
expressly disassociated itself with the earlier observations of the Supreme Court echoing the
sentiments of Westminster principle. The court enumerated the evil consequences of tax avoidance
as follows:
(1) Substantial loss of much needed public revenue.
(2) Serious disturbance caused to the economy of the country by the piling up mountains of black
money, directly causing inflation.
(3) Large hidden loss to the community by some of the best brains of the country involved in
perpetual litigation.
(4) Sense of injustice and inequality which tax avoidance arouses in the minds of those who are
unwilling or unable to profit from it.
(5) The unethical practice of transferring the burden of tax liability to the shoulders of the
guileless, good citizens from those of the ‘artful dodgers’.
The court felt that there was as much moral sanction behind taxation laws as behind any other
welfare legislation and avoidance of taxation was not ethical.
In the view of the Court, the proper way to construe a taxing statute while considering a device to
avoid tax was not to ask whether the provisions should be construed literally or liberally, nor whether
the transaction was not unreal and not prohibited by the statute, but whether the transaction was as
device to avoid tax and whether the transaction was such that the judicial process might record its
approval to it.
The court felt that it was neither fair nor desirable to expect the legislature to intervene and take
care of every device to avoid taxation. It was up to the court to take stock to determine the nature of
the new and sophisticated legal devices to avoid tax and consider whether the situation created by
the devices could be related to the existing legislation with the aid of emerging techniques of
interpretation as was done in Ramsey’s case to expose the devices for what they are really worth
and to refuse to give judicial benediction.
The Supreme Court emphasised that tax planning may be legitimate provided it is within the
framework of law and colorable devices cannot be part of tax planning. It is wrong to encourage or
entertain the belief that it is honourable to avoid the
payment of tax by resorting to dubious methods. The Tax planning may be
Supreme Court also recommended that it is the legitimate provided it is within
obligation of every citizen to pay the taxes honestly the framework of law
without resorting to subterfuge.
Another significant case decided by the Supreme Court, though involving a dispute relating to
payment of bonus, is worthy of reference at this stage as it also reflects the same thinking as in
Mc Dowell’s case. In Associated Rubber Industries case (1986) 157 ITR 77(SC), a new wholly owned
subsidiary company was created with no asset of its own except investments transferred by the
holding company with no business income, except receiving dividend from the transferred
investments. The Supreme Court held that on facts, the purpose of such a transfer of investments
was nothing but to reduce the gross profits of the holding company and thereby to reduce the
payment of bonus. There was no direct evidence that the subsidiary was formed as a device to
reduce the gross profits of the principal company for whatever purpose. But Justice Chinnappa
Reddy in passing his judgment was following the principles earlier laid down by him in Mc Dowell’s
case and was of the opinion that the transfer of shares was nothing but a device like tax evasion to
avoid a welfare legislation like the Payment of Bonus Act. It was observed that it is the duty of the
Court in every case where ingenuity is expended to avoid liability to taxation and welfare legislation,
to get behind the smoke screen and discover the true state of affairs.
The above decision seems to have introduced a new doctrine that it is upto the court to take stock,
weigh out sophisticated legal devices and expose the devices for what they really are. The fact that
this new doctrine has started gaining ground very fast is seen from a quick succession of decisions,
after Mc Dowell in Kartikeya vs. Sarabhai and in Associated Rubber’s case. The above change in
the trend of judicial thinking clearly shows that the line of demarcation between Tax Planning and
Tax avoidance.
- treating any transaction with the person located in the notified jurisdiction areas to be treated
as international transaction,
- provisions relating to furnishing of Tax Residency Certificate for claiming benefit of double
tax avoidance agreements
The decision in Mc Dowell’s case and the subsequent developments have evoked lot of debate in
all legal and tax circles.
The Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Smt. Minal Rameshchandra (1987) 61 CTR (Guj) 80 had occasion
to consider the impact of Mc Dowell’s case. The following propositions appear to emerge from the
same.
(i) Mc Dowell’s case and observations therein cannot be ignored and these are binding on all
courts.
(ii) Mc Dowell’s case and observation therein should be understood in the context of questioning
the legitimacy of the use of artificial and transparent device and sham practices to circumvent
the law.
(iii) Where the arrangement cannot be dismissed as an artificial tax device (and not as a
legitimate transaction), the subject can be taxed only having “regard to strict letter of the law
and not merely to the spirit of the statute or the substance of the law” and had been
consistently laid down earlier. In this sense there is no radical departure from law, prior to Mc
Dowell case.
In CWT. vs. Arvind Narottam [1988] 173 ITR 479 (SC) Judge Sabyasachi Mukharji J. made the
following significant observations:
(i) Where the language of the deed of settlement is plain and admits no ambiguity there is no
scope for considerations of tax avoidance.
(ii) One would wish as noted by Chinnappa Reddy in Mc Dowell’s case that one could get the
enthusiasm of Justice Holmes that taxes are the price of civilization and one would like to pay
that price to buy civilization. But the question which many ordinary taxpayers very often in a
country of shortages (with ostentatious consumption and deprivation for the large masses)
ask is does he with taxes buy civilization or does he facilitate the waste and ostentation of
the few. Unless waste and ostentation in government spending are avoided or eschewed no
amount of moral sermons would change people’s attitude to tax avoidance.
(iii) Where the true effect on the construction of the deeds is clear, appeal to discourage tax
avoidance is not a relevant consideration”.
In the light of the above development, we have to ascribe a proper meaning to the concept of tax-
planning. We can take a cue from the structure of our tax laws.
Our tax laws tend to serve a dual purpose of collecting revenue and of achieving certain social
objectives. There are in-built tax incentives which promote savings and investments in new
enterprises and facilitate the development of backward areas. A lot of exemptions and incentives
are provided in all the direct taxes. If an assessee takes maximum advantage of these incentives,
exemptions etc. and enlarges the scope of his disposable resources, there can be no objection
because the legislature wants the optimum utilisation of these incentives to promote economic
activity in the country. The complexity of our tax-laws makes it impossible for even an intelligent
assessee to comprehend them properly and avail all the reliefs which may be genuinely provided by
such laws. Moreover, the interaction of other laws such as MRTP Act, FERA, Companies Act etc.
make the exercise much more complicated. It requires, therefore, meticulous planning to bring down
the tax commitments keeping in view not only the statutes but also the judge -made law. We may
say that the above area properly belongs to tax-planning. In this sense there is nothing unethical
about tax-planning.
Due to constant changes in the law and new court decisions, it is always necessary to have a
continuous review in relation to all matters of tax planning so that appropriate changes are
introduced without delay.
(4) Doctrine of form and substance : One of the reasons which prompts a taxpayer to resort
to tax planning is the existence of the doctrine of form and substance. The principle involved in this
doctrine is simple. How far Court may stretch the wording of a Statute to cover a particular set of
facts, where those facts have clearly been created by a tax payer in order to avoid or minimise his
tax and the literal interpretation of the Statute is not, at first sight apt to cover them? Is it possible to
ignore the form of a transaction and determine the substance thereof?
Landmark Judgments wherein the doctrine of form and substance played a major role in
decision making:
(i) In Commissioner of Income tax vs. Motor and General Stores (P) Ltd. (1967) 66 ITR 692 , the
Supreme Court had observed that in the absence of any suggestion of bad faith or fraud the
true principle is that the taxing statute has to be applied in accordance with the legal rights of
the parties to the transaction. According to the court, when the transaction is embodied in a
document the liability to tax depends upon the meaning and content of the language used in
accordance with the ordinary rules of construction. The House of Lords in Duke of
Westminster vs. ICR (1936) 19 ATC 498 held that in considering the substance of the
transaction, the legal form cannot be disregarded.
(ii) It was held in CIT vs. B.M. Kharwar (1969) 72 ITR 603 (SC) that the taxing authority is entitled
and is indeed bound to determine the true legal relation resulting from a transaction. If the
parties have chosen to conceal by device the legal relation, it is open to the taxing authority
to unravel the device and to determine the true character of the relationship. However, the
legal effect of a transaction cannot be displaced by probing into ‘the substance of the
transaction’. This principle applies alike to cases in which the legal relation is recorded in a
formal document and to cases where it has to be gathered from the evidence - oral and
documentary - and the conduct of the parties to the transaction. However, this view of the
Supreme Court has now been expressly disapproved by the Supreme Court in Mc Dowell &
Co. Ltd.’s case.
(iii) Justice Shah, in Ram Laxman Sugar Mills vs. CIT (1967) 66 ITR 613, 617 (SC), has stated
that to ascertain the legal effect of a transaction, the court seeks, in the first instance, to
determine the intention of the parties and if ambiguous expressions are used, the court may
normally adopt such interpretation consistent with the parties thereto having acted on the
assumption of its validity. Thus, any claim made by a taxpayer will be scrutinized from the
point of view of his intention and if there was any intention to defraud the revenue, the court
will consider the transaction or the claim as fraud.
Thus, we can say that unless there is clear evidence of malafide intention resulting in a form
which is a “colorable device” or “mere legal facade” or “non-genuine” form the tax authorities
are not justified in disregarding the legal form and probing into the substance of the
transaction.
Principles governing the form and substance: Theory of interpretation of a taxing statute:
(i) It is well settled that when a transaction is arranged in one form known to law, it will attract
tax liability while, if it is entered into in another form which is equally lawful, it may not. In
considering, whether a transaction attracts tax or not, the form of the transaction put through
by the assessee is to be considered and not the substance thereof.
(ii) The above rule cannot naturally apply where the transaction, as put through by the assessee,
is not genuine but colourable or is a mere device. For here, the question is not one between
‘form’ and ‘substance’ but between appearance and truth.
(iii) In deciding whether the transaction is a genuine or colourable one, it will be open to the
authorities to pierce the corporate veil and look behind the legal facade at the reality of the
transaction.
(iv) Where the authorities are charged under the Act with the duty of determining the nature or
purpose of and payment or receipt on the facts of a case, it is open to them to work at the
substance of the matter and the formal aspect may be ignored.
(v) Where the terms of a transaction are embodied in a document, it should not be construed
only in its formal or technical aspect. While the words used should be looked at, too much
importance should not be attached to the name or label given by the parties and the document
should be interpreted so as to accord with the real intention of the parties as appearing from
the instrument.
As noted earlier, the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Mc Dowell, Karthikeya Sarabhai
and Associated Rubber Industries, clearly show a preference for the ‘substance’ over the ‘form’, if
the circumstances of the case warrant such a preference. Where the transactions are genuine,
perfectly authentic and not sham, the mere fact that the transaction results in less liability or no
liability to tax should not put the transaction to a legal scrutiny questioning the substance of the
transaction, attributing a motive behind it. It is up to the Court to take stock of the situation, weigh
out sophisticated legal devices and expose the devices for what they really are.
(5) Doctrine of Precedence : Doctrine of Precedence would be applicable in case of tax laws.
The following principles which govern the rule of precedence may be noted.
Supreme Court:
(i) The Supreme Court judgments are absolutely binding on all the courts, Tribunals and
authorities.
(ii) Not only the ratio decidendi1, but also obiter dicta2 of the Supreme Court are binding
on all the Courts.
(iii) When there are two irreconcilable decisions of the Supreme Court on some point of
law, the decision of a larger Bench shall prevail.
(iv) When there are two irreconcilable decisions of two Benches of similar strength, the
decision later in time will have to be followed by the lower courts.
(v) The Supreme Court judgments cannot be ignored by the lower courts though such
judgments are per incuriam.
(vi) The Supreme Court, though expected to follow its own judgments, is not bound to
follow them and in appropriate cases it can review its earlier judgment .
High Courts:
(i) A Division Bench of a High Court is generally bound by its earlier decision, but it may
refuse to follow the same if the earlier judgment is per incuriam3.
(ii) If the Division Bench of a High Court does not agree with its earlier judgment it will
have to either follow the same or refer the issue to a Full Bench.
(iii) A Division Bench of High Court is bound to follow a decision of the Full Bench of the
same High Court.
(iv) A single judge of a High Court is bound by a decision of a Division Bench or of the Full
Bench of the same High Court.
(v) A single judge of a High Court is not bound to follow the decision of another single
judge, though he is expected to follow the same.
(vi) All the lower authorities, Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunals are absolutely bound
to follow the decision of a High Court within whose jurisdiction they function. Here, the
High Court decisions include decision of a single judge.
(vii) The lower authorities and courts can ignore a decision of a High Court only if it is
overruled by a larger Bench of the same High Court, or by the Supreme Court or by a
later enactment.
Others:
(i) The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner, while acting under section 263, cannot
refuse to follow the decision of the High Court. They cannot pass orders which are
inconsistent with the decisions of the High Court within whose jurisdiction they
function, even for the purpose of keeping the issue alive.
(ii) In all Indian Acts like the Income-tax Act, 1961, to keep the uniformity of law, a High
Court should normally follow the decision of another High Court, unless it finds an
overriding reason not to follow the same.
(iii) The lower appellate authorities are bound to follow the decision of another High Court,
though they do not function within the jurisdiction of the said High Court, if there is no
contrary decision of any other High Court.
(iv) The Assessing Officer or the Commissioner need not follow the decision of another
High Court if the department has not accepted the said decision and has taken the
matter to Supreme Court.
(v) The Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, should generally follow the orders of other
Benches of the Tribunal, unless those orders of the Tribunal are per incuriam.
(vi) An order of a Full Bench of a Tribunal is binding on the ordinary Bench of the Tribunal.
(vii) If an ordinary bench of a Tribunal does not agree with an order of another Bench of
the Tribunal, and that order of another Bench of the Tribunal is not per incuriam, the
Bench cannot differ from the view taken by the other Bench. It can only get the matter
referred to a larger Bench. But this is subject to the general rule that as far as possible,
the Bench should try to follow the orders of the Benches.
(viii) The Tribunal orders are binding on the Commissioner (Appeals) falling within the
territorial jurisdiction of the Tribunal passing the order in question.
(ix) The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner are bound by the order of the Tribunal
(falling within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal unless the Department has not accepted
the decision of the Tribunal.)
Summary for Quick Reference of Doctrine of Precedence:
Decision of Will precede over the decision of
Supreme Court
Supreme Court All the Courts, Tribunals and authorities
Larger Bench of Supreme Court Smaller Bench of Supreme Court
Supreme Court at a later point in time Supreme Court at an earlier point in time
(if same strength)
High Court
High Court (even if single judge All the lower authorities, Commissioner
decision) (Appeals), Joint Commissioner (Appeals) and
Tribunals functioning within the jurisdiction of
the High Court
Full Bench of High Court Division Bench of same High Court and single
judge of same High Court
Division Bench of High Court Single Judge of same High Court
Appellate Tribunal
Full Bench of a Tribunal Ordinary Bench of the Tribunal
Tribunal Assessing Officer, Commissioner and
Commissioner (Appeals)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") along with G-20 countries sort
to tackle this issue. The BEPS Action plans have come out with various recommendations on the
issue, both to address it within the international treaty framework (for example, introducing the
principle purpose test, limitation of benefits clause, amending the permanent establishment clause,
etc.) and in the domestic tax law context (for example, controlled foreign corporation rules,
equalization levy, etc.).
Tax avoidance is not defined in taxing statutes. Tax avoidance is, nevertheless, the outcome of
actions taken by the assessee, none of which or no combination of which is illegal or forbidden by
the law as such. International literature on the subject tends to describe it in the following ways:
Tax avoidance involves the legal exploitation of tax laws to one’s own advantage.
Every attempt by legal means to prevent or reduce tax liability which would otherwise be
incurred, by taking advantage of some provisions or lack of provisions in the law.
An arrangement entered into solely or primarily for the purpose of obtaining a tax advantage.
Taxpayers consider it their legitimate right to arrange their affairs in a manner as to pay the least tax
possible. However, tax authorities internationally consider aggressive tax planning schemes by
taxpayers to erode the tax base unnaturally, particularly when effective rates of tax diminish
significantly. Several countries have, therefore, legislated to prevent tax avoidance in various ways
The General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) provisions aim at combating 'impermissible tax
avoidance'. Many countries, like the United Kingdom, China, South Africa, Australia, Canada and
Brazil have incorporated General Anti-Avoidance Rules in their domestic tax laws to deal with
aggressive tax planning.
In India, the GAAR concept was initially introduced in the Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2009 [DTC Bill,
2009]. Later, a Revised Discussion Paper was released. The Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2010 [DTC Bill,
2010] proposed to introduce GAAR from 1st April 2012 onwards. The GAAR provisions were
introduced in the Income-tax Act, 1961 vide the Finance Act, 2012 by insertion of new Chapter X-A.
Chapter X-A was substituted by the Finance Act, 2013.
The Government subsequently set up a panel under Parthasarathy Shome to review the proposals.
The Committee suggested that the rules be deferred by three years to 2016 -17, arguing that more
time is needed to create administrative machinery for its implementation and called for intensive
training of officials.
The Shome Committee Report explains the need for and rationale of GAAR as under :
(i) GAAR has been enacted as a codification of the proposition that, while interpreting the tax
legislation, substance should be selected over a legal form.
(ii) Transactions have to be real and are not to be looked at in isolation.
(iii) The fact that the transactions are legal, does not imply that they are acceptable with reference
to the underlying meaning embedded in the fiscal statute.
(iv) Thus, where there is no business purpose except to obtain a tax benefit, the GAAR provisions
would not allow such a tax benefit to be availed through the tax statute. These propositions
have comprised part of jurisprudence in direct tax laws as reflected in various judicial
decisions.
The GAAR provisions codify this ‘substance over form’ basis of the tax law.
The CBDT, vide Press Release dated January 27, 2017, clarified that the GAAR provisions shall be
effective from A.Y.2018-19 onwards, i.e., financial year 2017-18 onwards. The provisions of GAAR
are contained in Chapter X-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The necessary procedures for application
of GAAR and conditions under which it shall not apply, have been enumerated in Rules 10U to 10UC
of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Prior to A.Y. 2018-19, the Act contained only Specific Anti-Avoidance Rules (SAARs) to prevent tax
avoidance. SAAR targets known tax planning schemes which are commonly used by taxpayers but
are not acceptable owing to misuse or abuse of tax laws, or they result in a consequence unintended
in the law. In the Act, the following may, inter alia, be considered specific examples of SAAR -
(i) Section 40A(2) on excessive or unreasonable payments to related parties not deductible
(ii) Section 80-IA(8) on transactions with tax exempt entities to be valued at market value.
(iii) Sections 92 to 92F on transfer pricing regulations applicable to international transactions.
These provisions are also made applicable to specified domestic transactions by the Finance
Act, 2012.
(iv) Section 93 on avoidance of tax by transfer of income to non-residents through transfer of
assets, rights or interest.
(v) Section 94 on avoidance of tax by certain transactions in securities.
(vi) Section 94A on transactions with persons located in notified jurisdictions.
(vii) Section 2(22)(e) on deemed dividend.
(viii) Section 40(a)(i) and (ia) on the disallowance of expenses for non-deduction of tax at source.
(ix) Section 9 on scope of 'income deemed to accrue or arise in India'. The Finance Act, 2012 had
widened its scope to overcome the Supreme Court's ruling in Vodafone and some other cases.
(x) Explanations 1 to 13 to section 43(1) on determination of actual cost of assets ignoring
agreements, etc., in certain cases.
Tax treaties also provide certain anti-avoidance rules for instance, the Limitation of Benefit (LOB)
Clause and concept of Beneficial Ownership.
The above list of provisions relating to SAAR other than section 94 are discussed in the respective
chapters of the Study Material. Before moving to the discussion on provisions of GAAR, let’s
understand section 94.
Special provisions for avoidance of tax by certain transactions in securities [Section 94]
Note – Since dividend and income from units of mutual fund specified under section 10(23D) and
UTI is taxable in the hands of shareholders/unitholders, the provisions of section 94(7) are currently
not relevant in relation to such income.
In case of dividend from units of business trust, the same would be taxable in the hands of
unitholders, if the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) exercises the option under section 115BAA, in
which case the provisions of section 94(7) would not be attracted. However, if the SPV does not
exercise option under section 115BAA, dividend component of income distributed to unit -holders
would be exempt in the hands of unit-holders, in which case the provisions of section 94(7) would
be attracted if the person buys and sells or transfers units within the specif ied period mentioned
above.
(a) any person buys or acquires any securities or units within a period of three months prior to
the record date;
(b) such person is allotted additional securities or units without any payment on the basis of
holding such securities or units on such date;
(c) such person sells or transfers all or any of the securities or units referred to in (a) above
within a period of nine months after such date, while continuing to hold all or any of the
additional securities or units referred to in (b), then –
(i) the loss on sale of original securities or units sold within a period of 9 months after the
record date will be ignored for the purpose of computing his income chargeable to tax
and
(ii) the amount of such loss so ignored will be deemed to be the cost of purchase or
acquisition of the bonus securities or units referred to in (b) above, held by him on the
date of such sale or transfer.
Buying securities or units Bonus issued (Record date) Selling original securities
or original units
Example 1
Facts:
M/s India Chem Ltd. is a company incorporated in India. It sets up a unit in a Special Economic Zone
(SEZ) in F.Y. 2019-20 for manufacturing of chemicals. It claims 50% deduction of profits earned
from that unit in F.Y. 2025-26 and subsequent years as per section 10AA of the Act. Is GAAR
applicable in such a case?
Interpretation:
There is an arrangement of setting up of a unit in SEZ which results in a tax benefit. However, this
is a case of tax mitigation where the tax payer is taking advantage of a fiscal incentive offered to
him by complying with the conditions imposed and economic consequences of the provisions in the
legislation e.g., setting up the business unit in SEZ area. Hence, the Revenue would not invoke
GAAR as regards this arrangement.
Example 1A
Facts:
In the above example 1, let us presume M/s India Chem Ltd. has another unit for manufacturing
chemicals in a non-SEZ area. It then diverts its production from such manufacturing unit and shows
the same as manufactured in the tax exempt SEZ unit, while doing only the process of packaging
there. Is GAAR applicable in such a case?
Interpretation:
This is a case of misrepresentation of facts by showing production of non -SEZ unit as production of
SEZ unit. Hence, this is an arrangement of tax evasion and not tax avoidance.
Tax evasion, being unlawful, can be dealt with directly by establishing correct facts. GAAR provisions
will not be invoked in such a case.
Example 1B
Facts:
In the above example 1A, let us presume that M/s India Chem Ltd. does not show production of non-
SEZ unit as a production of SEZ unit but transfers the product of non -SEZ unit at a price lower than
the fair market value to SEZ unit and does only some insignificant activity in SEZ unit. Thus, it is
able to show higher profits in SEZ unit than in non-SEZ unit, and consequently claims higher
deduction in computation of income. Can GAAR be invoked to deny the tax benefit?
Interpretation:
As there is no misrepresentation of facts or false submissions, it is not a case of tax evasion. The
company has tried to take advantage of tax provisions by diverting profits from non -SEZ unit to SEZ
unit. This is not the intention of the SEZ legislation. However, such tax avoidance is specifically dealt
with through the provisions contained in section 10AA(9), as per which provisions of section 80 -IA(8)
would get attracted in such a case. Further, if the aggregate of such transactions entered into in the
relevant previous year exceed the threshold of ` 20 crore, domestic transfer pricing regulations
under section 92BA would be attracted. Hence, the Revenue need not invoke GAAR in such a case,
though GAAR and SAAR can co-exist as per clarification given in the CBDT Circular.
Example 1C
Facts:
In the above example 1B, let us presume, that both units in SEZ area (say A) and non -SEZ area
(say B) work independently. M/s India Chem Ltd. started taking new export orders from existing as
well as new clients for unit A and gradually, the export from unit B declined. The com pany offered
lower profits from unit B in computation of income. Can GAAR be invoked on the ground that there
has been shifting or reconstruction of business from unit B to unit A for the main purpose of obtaining
tax benefit?
Interpretation:
The issue of tax avoidance through shifting/reconstruction of existing business from one unit to
another has been specifically dealt with in section 10AA of the Act. Hence, the Revenue need not
invoke GAAR in such a case, though GAAR and SAAR can co-exist as per clarification given in the
CBDT Circular.
(1) An impermissible avoidance arrangement (IAA) means an arrangement, the main purpose or
one of the main purposes of which is to obtain a tax benefit and also any of the following tests
is satisfied:
(c) lacks
(a) creates rights, commercial (d) is entered into,
or obligations, (b) results, directly substance or is or carried out, by
which are not or indirectly, in the deemed to lack means, or in a
ordinarily created misuse, or abuse, commercial manner, which are
between persons of the provisions of substance under not ordinarily
dealing at arm's this Act; section 97, in whole employed for bona
length; or in part; or fide purposes
(2) The purpose test of obtaining tax benefit and tainted element test as under clauses (a)
to (d) above are twin conditions that satisfy an impermissible avoidance arrangement. The
purpose test requires that the main purpose or one of the main purposes is to obtain tax
benefit. The term “tax benefit” has been defined in section 102 clause (10) as under -
(a) a reduction or avoidance or deferral of tax or other amount payable under this Act; or
examined only in those transactions which are not covered by Transfer Pricing regulations
and where the main purpose of the arrangement is to obtain tax benefit.
(4) The second tainted element refers to an arrangement which results in misuse or abuse of
the provisions of the Act. It implies cases where the law is followed in letter or form but not in
spirit or substance, or where the arrangement results in consequences which are not intended
by the legislation, revealing an intent to misuse or abuse the law.
Example 2
Facts:
A LTD
K LTD L LTD
Country F4
Ind Co
Under the provisions of a tax treaty between India and country F4, any capital gains arising
from the sale of shares of Indco, an Indian company, would be taxable only in F4 if the
transferor is a resident of F4 except where the transferor holds more than 10% interest in
the capital stock of Indco. A company, A Ltd., being resident in F4, makes an investment
in Indco through two wholly owned subsidiaries (K Ltd. and L Ltd.) located in F4. Each
subsidiary holds 9.95% shareholding in the Indian Company, the total adding to 19.9% of
equity of Indco. The subsidiaries sell the shares of Indco and claim exemption as each is
holding less than 10% equity shares in the Indian company. Can GAAR be invoked to deny
treaty benefit?
Interpretation:
The above arrangement of splitting the investment through two subsidiaries appears to be
with the intention of obtaining tax benefit under the treaty. Further, there appears to be no
commercial substance in creating two subsidiaries as they do not change t he economic
condition of investor A Ltd. in any manner (i.e. on business risks or cash flow), and reveals
a tainted element of abuse of tax laws. Hence, the arrangement can be treated as an
impermissible avoidance arrangement by invoking GAAR. Consequently , treaty benefit
would be denied by ignoring K and L, the two subsidiaries, or by treating K and L as one
and the same company for tax computation purposes.
(5) The third tainted element refers to an arrangement which lacks commercial substance or is
deemed to lack commercial substance.
(6) The fourth element refers to an arrangement which is entered into, or carried out, by means
of, or in a manner which is normally not employed for a bona fide purpose. In other words, it
means an arrangement that possesses abnormal features. This is not a purpose test but a
manner test.
Arrangement to lack commercial substance [Section 97]
the arrangement, then the tax consequence of a particular arrangement should be assessed
based on the ―substance of what took place. In other words, it reflects the inherent ability of
the law to remove the corporate veil and look beyond form.
(3) Sub-clause (i) of clause (b) deems an arrangement, which includes round tripping of funds,
to lack commercial substance. For this purpose, the phrase round trip financing has been
further defined. Round trip financing includes any arrangement in which, through a series of
transactions—
(a) funds are transferred among the parties to the arrangement; and
(b) such transactions do not have any substantial commercial purpose other than
obtaining the tax benefit (but for the provisions of this Chapter),
without having any regard to—
(A) whether or not the funds involved in the round trip financing can be traced to any funds
transferred to, or received by, any party in connection with the arrangement;
(B) the time, or sequence, in which the funds involved in the round trip financing are
transferred or received; or
(C) the means by, or manner in, or mode through, which funds involved in the round trip
financing are transferred or received.
Example 3
Facts:
Indco incorporates a Subco in a LTJ (Low Tax Jurisdiction) with equity of US $100. Subco
gives a loan of US $ 100 to another Indian company (X Ltd.) at the rate of 10% p.a. X Ltd.
claims deduction of interest payable to Subco from the profit of business. There is no other
activity in Subco. Can GAAR be invoked in such a case?
Subco
Debt
NTJ
India
Indco X Ltd
Interpretation:
The arrangement appears to avoid payment of tax on interest income by Indco in case
loan is directly provided by Indco to X Ltd. The arrangement involves round tripping of
funds even though the funds emanating from Indco are not traced back to Indco in this
case. Hence, the arrangement may be deemed to lack commercial substance.
Consequently, in the case of Indco, Subco may be disregarded and the interest income
may be taxed in the hands of Indco.
(4) Sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) deems an arrangement which includes an accommodating party
to lack commercial substance. For this, the phrase “accommodating party ” has been further
defined. A party to an arrangement shall be an accommodating party, if the main purpose of
the direct or indirect participation of that party in the arrangement, in whole or in part, is to
obtain, directly or indirectly, a tax benefit (but for the provisions of this Chapter) for the
assessee whether or not the party is a connected person in relation to any party to the
arrangement.
It means that where a party is included in an arrangement mainly for obtaining tax benefit to
the taxpayer, then such party may be treated as an accommodating party and consequently
the arrangement shall be deemed to lack commercial substance. Also, it is not necessary that
such party should be connected to the taxpayer.
(5) Sub-clause (iii) of clause (b) deems an arrangement, which includes elements that have effect
of offsetting or cancelling each other to lack commercial substance.
(6) Sub-clause (iv) of clause (b) deems an arrangement, which disguises value, source or
location etc. of funds, to lack commercial substance. In other words, such arrangements have
an element of deceit as regards funds.
(7) Clause (c) deems an arrangement to lack commercial substance where it involves the location
of an asset or of a transaction or of the place of residence of any party and such location is
without any substantial commercial purpose. It means if a particular location is selected for
an asset or transaction or residence, and such selection has no substantial commercial
purpose, then such arrangement shall be deemed to lack commercial substance .
Example 4
Facts:
Country F1 LTJ
100%
Y Ltd A Ltd
Country C1 Debt
49%
India
Z Ltd X Ltd
51%
The next question is, does the arrangement have any tainted element? It is evident that
there is no commercial substance in incorporating A Ltd. as it does not have any effect on
the business risk of Y Ltd. or cash flow of Y Ltd. As the twin conditions of main purpose
being tax benefit and the existence of a tainted element are satisfied, GAAR may be
invoked.
Additionally, as all rights of shareholders of X Ltd. are being exercised by Y Ltd instead of
A Ltd, it again shows that A Ltd lacks commercial substance.
Hence, it is possible to invoke GAAR in this case.
(8) In section 97(4), the following factors are considered relevant but not sufficient for
determining whether an arrangement lacks commercial substance or not, namely —
(i) the period or time for which the arrangement (including operations therein) exists;
(ii) the fact of payment of taxes, directly or indirectly, under the arrangement;
(iii) the fact that an exit route (including transfer of any activity or business or operations)
is provided by the arrangement.
(a) disregarding, combining or re-characterizing any step in, or a part or whole of, the
impermissible avoidance arrangement;
(b) treating the impermissible avoidance arrangement as if it had not been entered into or
carried out;
(c) disregarding any accommodating party or treating any accommodating party and any
other party as one and the same person;
(d) deeming persons who are connected persons in relation to each other to be one and
the same person for the purposes of determining tax treatment of any amount;
(iv) the arrangement may be considered or looked through by disregarding any corporate
structure.
(2) The term ‘connected person’ is defined in section 102(4). Connected person means any
person who is connected directly or indirectly to another person and includes –
Question no. 3: Will GAAR interplay with the right of the taxpayer to select or choose method of
implementing a transaction?
Answer: GAAR will not interplay with the right of the taxpayer to select or choose method of
implementing a transaction.
Question no. 4: Will GAAR provisions apply where the jurisdiction of the FPI is finalised based on
non-tax commercial considerations and such FPI has issued P-notes referencing Indian securities?
Further, will GAAR be invoked with a view to denying treaty eligibility to a Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV), either on the ground that it is located in a tax friendly jurisdiction or on the ground that it does
not have its own premises or skilled professional on its own roll as employees.
Answer: For GAAR application, the issue, as may be arising regarding the choice of entity, location
etc., has to be resolved on the basis of the main purpose and other conditions provided under section
96 of the Act. GAAR shall not be invoked merely on the ground that the entity is located in a tax
efficient jurisdiction. If the jurisdiction of FPI is finalized based on non-tax commercial considerations
and the main purpose of the arrangement is not to obtain tax benefit, GAAR will not apply.
Question no. 5: Will GAAR provisions apply to (i) any securities issued by way of bonus issuances
so long as the original securities are acquired prior to 01 April, 2017 (ii) shares issued post 31 March,
2017, on conversion of Compulsorily Convertible Debentures, Compulsorily Convertible Preference
Shares (CCPS), Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs), Global Depository Receipts (GDRs),
acquired prior to 01 April, 2017; (iii) shares which are issued consequent to split up or consolidation
of such grandfathered shareholding?
Answer: Grandfathering under Rule 10U(1)(d) will be available to investments made before 1st April
2017 in respect of instruments compulsorily convertible from one form to another, at terms finalized
at the time of issue of such instruments. Shares brought into existence by way of split or
consolidation of holdings, or by bonus issuances in respect of shares acquired prior to 1st April 2017
in the hands of the same investor would also be eligible for grandfathering under Rule 10U(1)(d) of
the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
Question no. 6: The expression "investments" can cover investment in all forms of instrument -
whether in an Indian Company or in a foreign company, so long as the disposal thereof may give
rise to income chargeable to tax. Grandfathering should extend to all forms of investments including
lease contracts (say, aircraft leases) and loan arrangements, etc.
Answer: Grandfathering is available in respect of income from transfer of investments made before
1st April, 2017. As per Accounting Standards, 'investments' are assets held by an enterprise for
earning income by way of dividends, interest, rentals and for capital appreciation. Lease contracts
and loan arrangements are, by themselves, not 'investments' and hence grandfathering is not
available.
Question no. 7: Will GAAR be invoked if arrangement is sanctioned by an authority such as the
Court, National Company Law Tribunal or is in accordance with judicial precedents etc.?
Answer: Where the Court has explicitly and adequately considered the tax implication while
sanctioning an arrangement, GAAR will not apply to such arrangement.
Question no. 8: Will a Fund claiming tax treaty benefits in one year and opting to be governed by
the provisions of the Act in another year attract GAAR provisions? An example would be where a
Fund claims treaty benefits in respect of gains from derivatives in one year and in another year set-
off losses from derivatives transactions against gains from shares under the Act.
Answer: GAAR provisions are applicable to impermissible avoidance arrangements as under
section 96. In so far as the admissibility of claim under treaty or domestic law in different years is
concerned, it is not a matter to be decided through GAAR provisions.
Question no. 9: How will it be ensured that GAAR will be invoked in rare cases to deal with highly
aggressive and artificially pre-ordained schemes and based on cogent evidence and not on the basis
of interpretation difference?
Answer: The proposal to declare an arrangement as an impermissible avoidance arrangement
under GAAR will be vetted first by the Principal Commissioner / Commissioner and at the second
stage by an Approving Panel, headed by judge of a High Court. Thus, adequate sa feguards are in
place to ensure that GAAR is invoked only in deserving cases.
Question no. 10: Can GAAR lead to assessment of notional income or disallowance of real
expenditure? Will GAAR provisions expand the scope of charging provisions or scope of taxable
base and/or disallow the expenditure which is actually incurred and which otherwise is admi ssible
having regard to diverse provisions of the Act?
Answer: If the arrangement is covered under section 96, then the arrangement will be disregarded
by application of GAAR and necessary consequences will follow.
Question no. 11: A definite timeline may be provided such as 5 to 10 years of existence of the
arrangement where GAAR provisions will not apply in terms of the provisions in this regard in section
97(4).
Answer: Period of time for which an arrangement exists is only a relevant factor and not a sufficient
factor under section 97(4) to determine whether an arrangement lacks commercial substance.
Question no. 12: It may be ensured that in practice, the consequences of a transaction being treated
as an 'impermissible avoidance arrangement' are determined in a uniform, fair and rational basis.
Compensating adjustments under section 98 of the Act should be done in a c onsistent and fair
manner. It should be clarified that if a particular consequence is applied in the hands of one of the
participants, there would be corresponding adjustment in the hands of another participant.
Answer: Adequate procedural safeguards are in place to ensure that GAAR is invoked in a uniform,
fair and rational manner. In the event of a particular consequence being applied in the hands of one
of the participants as a result of GAAR, corresponding adjustment in the hands of another participant
will not be made. GAAR is an anti-avoidance provision with deterrent consequences and
corresponding tax adjustments across different taxpayers could militate against deterrence.
Question no. 13: Tax benefit of INR 3 crores as defined in section 102(10) may be calculated in
respect of each arrangement and each taxpayer and for each relevant assessment year separately.
For evaluating the main purpose to be obtaining of tax benefit, the review shoul d extend to tax
consequences across territories. The tax impact of INR 3 crores should be considered after taking
into account impact to all the parties to the arrangement i.e. on a net basis and not on a gross basis
(i.e. impact in the hands of one or few parties selectively).
Answer: The application of the tax laws is jurisdiction specific and hence what can be seen and
examined is the Tax Benefit' enjoyed in Indian jurisdiction due to the 'arrangement or part of the
arrangement'. Further, such benefit is assessment year specific. Fur ther, GAAR is with respect to
an arrangement or part of the arrangement and therefore limit of INR 3 crores cannot be read in
respect of a single taxpayer only.
Question no. 14: Will a contrary view be taken in subsequent years if arrangement held to be
permissible in an earlier year?
Answer: If the PCIT/Approving Panel has held the arrangement to be permissible in one year and
facts and circumstances remain the same, as per the principle of consistency, GAAR will not be
invoked for that arrangement in a subsequent year.
Question no. 15: No penalty proceedings should be initiated pursuant to additions made under
GAAR at least for the initial 5 years.
Answer: Levy of penalty depends on facts and circumstances of the case and is not automatic. No
blanket exemption for a period of five years from penalty provisions is available under law. The
assessee, may at his option, apply for benefit u/s 273A if he satisfies conditions prescribed therein.
6. M/s Global Architects Inc is a company incorporated in country F1. It is engaged in the business
of providing architectural design services all over the world. It receives an offer from Lovely
Resorts Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, for design and development of resorts all over India.
India-F1 tax treaty provides that architectural services are technical services and payment for
the same to a company may be taxed in India. However, if such professional services are
provided by a firm or individual, then payment for such services are taxable only if the firm
has a fixed base in India or stay of partners/ employees in India exceed 180 days. Limitation
of benefit clause does not exist in tax treaty between India-F1.
M/s Global Architects Inc forms a partnership firm with a third party (director of the company)
having only a nominal share in the F1. The firm enters into an agreement to carry out the
services in India. The company seconded its trained manpower to the fi rm.
Thus, the partnership firm claimed the treaty benefit and no tax was paid in India. Can such
an arrangement be examined under GAAR?
Answers
1. Tax planning is carried out within the framework of law by availing the deductions and
exemptions permitted by law and thereby minimizing tax liability. Tax planning is an
arrangement by which full advantage is taken of the concessions and benefits conferr ed by
the statute, without violation of legal provisions. Tax evasion on the other hand is an attempt
to reduce tax liability by dubious or artificial methods or downright fraud. It is illegal and denies
the State its legitimate share of tax.
2. Tax Planning / Tax Management / Tax Evasion
Answer Reason
1. Tax planning Depositing money in PPF and claiming deduction under section 80C
is as per the provisions of law.
2. Tax Maintaining a register of payments subject to TDS helps in
management complying with the obligations under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. Tax planning Making a tax saver deposit of ` 1,00,000 in a nationalized bank for
claiming deduction under section 80C by an individual is a permitted
tax planning measure under the provisions of income-tax law.
4. Tax Obtaining declaration from lenders/depositors in Form No. 15G/15H
management by a partnership firm and forwarding the same to Income-tax
authorities is in the nature of compliance with statutory obligation
under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
5. Tax evasion An air conditioner fitted at the residence of a director as per the
terms of his appointment would be a furniture qualifying for
depreciation @10%, whereas an air conditioner fitted in a factory
would be a plant qualifying for a higher depreciation @15%. The
wrong treatment unjustifiably increases the amount of depreciation
and consequently, reduces profit and consequent tax liability.
Treatment of air-conditioner fitted at the residence of a director as a
plant fitted at the factory would tantamount to furnishing of false
particulars in an attempt to evade tax.
6. Tax evasion Issuance of a credit note for ` 80,000 by RR Ltd. as brokerage
payable to Mr. Ramana, the son of the Managing Director, to
increase his total income from ` 11.2 lakh to ` 12.00 lakh and to
correspondingly reduce the company’s total income is a method of
reducing the tax liability of the company by recording a fictitious
transaction.
The company is liable to tax at a flat rate of 30%/25%/22%, as the
case may be, whereas Mr. Ramana would not be liable to pay any
tax as per the default regime under section 115BAC, since his total
income does not exceed ` 12,00,000, consequent to which he would
be eligible for tax rebate of entire tax amount under section 87A.
Reducing tax liability by recording a fictitious transaction would
tantamount to tax evasion.
7. Tax Remitting of own contribution to provident fund and employees
management contribution to provident fund on a monthly basis before the due date
is proper compliance with the statutory obligations.
3. The following are certain principles enunciated by the Courts on the question as to whether
it is the form or substance of a transaction, which will prevail in income-tax matters:
(i) Form of transaction is to be considered in case of genuine transactions - It is
well settled that when a transaction is arranged in one form known to law, it will attract
tax liability whereas, if it is entered into in another form which is equally lawful, it may
not. Therefore, in considering whether a transaction attracts tax or not, the form of the
transaction put through is to be considered and not the substance. However, this rule
applies only to genuine transactions. [CIT v. Motor and General Stores (P) Ltd. v. CIT
(1967) 66 ITR 692(SC).
(ii) True legal relation is the crucial element for taxability - It is open for the authorities
to pierce the corporate veil and look behind the legal facade at the reality of the
transaction. The taxing authority is entitled as well as bound to determine the true
legal relation resulting from a transaction. The true legal relation arising from a
transaction alone determines the taxability of a receipt arising from the transaction
[CIT v. B.M. Kharwar (1969) 72 ITR 603 (SC)]
(iii) Substance (i.e. actual nature of expense) is relevant and not the form – Under
section 97, an arrangement shall be deemed to lack commercial substance if the
substance or effect of the arrangement as a whole, is inconsistent with or differs
significantly from, the form of its individual steps or a part. Accordingly, such
arrangement would be impermissible avoidance arrangement and be subject to GAAR.
However, GAAR provisions will be applicable only to an arrangement where the tax
benefit in the relevant A.Y. arising, in aggregate to all parties to the arrangement
exceeds ` 3 crores. The Income-tax Act, 1961 also contains Specific Anti-avoidance
provisions to address the concern of tax avoidance.
Some examples where Supreme Court has upheld substance over form are -
(a) In case of an expenditure, the mere fact that the payment is made under an
agreement does not preclude the department from enquiring into the actual nature
of the payment [Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1967) 63 ITR 57(SC)].
(b) In order to determine whether a particular item of expenditure is of revenue or
capital nature, the substance and not merely the form should be looked into.
[Assam Bengal Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT (1955) 27 ITR 34 (SC)].
4. As regards setting off of losses, the provisions relating to merger and amalgamation already
contain specific anti-avoidance safeguards. Therefore, GAAR need not be invoked when SAAR
is applicable, though as per CBDT Circular No. 7/2017 dated 27.01.2017, GAAR and SAAR can
co-exist. Further, since merger and amalgamation would be carried out under the order of the
National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), GAAR need not be invoked if the NCLT has explicitly
and adequately considered the tax implication while sanctioning the merger scheme.
5. GAAR provisions would not apply in this case as the taxpayer merely makes a selection out
of the options available to him under the provisions of the Act for which he is eligible and
satisfies the stipulated conditions, if any. Even if choice of such option results in lower tax
liability, the same is a result of tax planning.
6. It is obvious that there was no commercial necessity to create a separate firm except to obtain
the tax benefit. The firm was only on paper as the manpower was drawn from the company.
The firm did not have any commercial substance. Moreover, it is a case of treaty abuse.
Hence, GAAR may be invoked to disregard the firm and tax payment for architectural services
as fee for technical services. However, the rate of tax on such payment shall be as applicable
under the treaty, if more beneficial.
TAXATION OF DIGITAL
TRANSACTIONS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1
12.2 DIRECT TAX LAWS
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
E-commerce
• Meaning
• How e-commerce transactions takes
place Taxation of Virtual Digital Assets
12.1 INTRODUCTION
The rapid growth of information and communication technology has resulted in substantial expansion
of the supply and procurement of digital goods and services globally, including India. The digital
economy is growing at a faster pace than the global economy as a whole.
At present, in the digital domain, business may be conducted without regard to national boundaries
and may dissolve the link between an income-producing activity and a specific location. Hence,
business in digital domain doesn’t actually occur in any physical location but instead takes place in
"cyberspace." Persons carrying business in digital domain could be located anywhere in the world.
Entrepreneurs across the world have been quick to evolve their business to take advantage of these
changes. It has also made it possible for the businesses to conduct themselves in ways that did not
exist earlier, and given rise to new business models that rely more on digital and telecommunication
network, do not require physical presence, and derives substantial value from data collected and
transmitted from such networks.
The growth of e-commerce economy has revolutionised the concept of brick and mortar to click and
order. The need for physical presence in a jurisdiction is consequently getting diminished. Therefore,
due to transformed business models, communication with suppliers and customers take place
virtually and digitally. Emergence of new age technologies such as 3D printing, sharing economy,
internet of things etc. has revolutionised new business models in line with the digital epoch making
it difficult to identify the location of source or origin point of a business transaction.
The expansion of business in digital form, give rise to certain tax challenges in relation to nexus,
data and characterization of digital transactions. Over the years, to address these tax challenges
certain developments are taking place to tax digital transactions which are carried out either by a
non-resident non-corporate/ a foreign company or by a resident assessee. This chapter
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.3
a
encompasses these developments introduced in the form of taxation of gains arising on transfer of
virtual digital assets by a resident assessee.
E-commerce or electronic commerce is one of the main components of the Digital Economy. In its
widest sense, it encompasses consumer and business transactions conducted over a network, with
the help of computers and telecommunications. In other words, e-commerce refers to the exchange
of goods or services for value on the internet. E-commerce, inter-alia, includes, online shopping,
online trading of goods and services, electronic fund transfers, electronic data exchanges and online
trading of financial instruments.
1OECD defines e-commerce as the sale or purchase of goods or services, conducted over computer
networks by methods specifically designed for the purpose of receiving or placing orders.
Accordingly, whether a commercial transaction qualifies as e-commerce is determined by the
ordering method rather than the characteristics of the product purchased, the parties involved, the
mode of payment or the delivery channel. The ordering process is considered as a crucial
determinant of an e-commerce transaction in the OECD definition.
E-commerce facilitates trade across borders, increases convenience for consumers, and enables
firms to reach new markets. E-commerce reforms have rapidly evolved through the development of
new business models, which often integrate new and emerging digital technologies as well as new
online payment mechanisms. Many e-commerce business models use online platforms, facilitating
purchases between often unknown and dispersed buyers and sellers. Another emerging trend is the
growth of subscription e-commerce business models, whereby users access goods and services in
a continuous, recurring stream. E-commerce business models integrate digital ordering mechanisms
alongside physical infrastructures, including within brick-and-mortar stores.
1 OECD (2019), Unpacking E-commerce: Business Models, Trends and Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris,
[Link]
12.4 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(i) Business to Customers (B2C): In this type of e-commerce, transactions take place between
businesses and consumers. In B2C e-commerce, products or services are sold to end-users
(i.e. consumers).
Examples: [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link] etc. are the examples of
B2C e-commerce businesses, where consumers can find almost anything be it books,
electronic products like washing machines, USB storage devices, clothes, shoes or personal
care etc.
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.5
a
(ii) Business to Business (B2B): In B2B e-commerce, transactions take place between two
businesses.
Example: IndiaMART, TradeIndia, Alibaba, [Link] (an online B2B
marketplace for global exporters and importers), Amazon, the US-based ecommerce giant
etc. are the example of B2B online platforms.
(iii) Government to Customers (G2C): The online platform between a government and its
citizens or consumers for paying taxes, registering vehicles, and providing information and
services such as filing of income-tax return etc.
In the context of e-commerce, online platforms act as intermediaries between buyers and sellers to
facilitate the exchange of goods and services over the Internet. Buyers benefit due to the presence
12.6 DIRECT TAX LAWS
of variety of products available with diverse sellers. Likewise, sellers discover many buyers to whom
they can sell their products. As compared to the physical stores, digital marketplace deliver variety
of goods and service.
Meaning of Marketplace based model and Inventory based model of e-commerce2:
Digital identity and its potential for e-commerce: Digital identity refers to the set of information
used by a computer to authenticate an identity. For example, India’s Aadhaar programme issues a
unique number to every Indian citizen which is a valid means of identification vis-à-vis the
government as well as private Internet sites including Airbnb, Uber and digital wallet services.
Subscription access to tangible and bundled goods and services: A recent e-commerce trend
has been the growth of subscription business models for tangible goods, including in categories like
beauty supplies (Birchbox), minerals (Celestial Minerals), groceries (Blue Apron, Hello Fresh), snack
foods (Nature Box), cosmetics and self-care products (Dollar Shave Club, Harry’s), and many more.
Online-offline e-commerce business models: These business models serve as extensions of
e-commerce, pushing the edges of online purchases into physical stores. Some business models
combine online ordering with offline distribution, which may be useful to enable the online purchase
of products whose quality may not be assessed from a distance, such as perishable goods like
groceries. Many businesses have taken advantage of the ubiquity of digital technologies to grow
business models based on a combination of both online and offline features. Other online businesses
are moving offline by adding brick-and-mortar elements to enable the online sale of other goods, like
clothing, where fit may be difficult to assess from a distance.
2 Consolidated FDI Policy Circular of 2017, dated 28.8.2017 read with Press Note dated 26.12.2018
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.7
a
with the same mobile money system, exchanged with merchants for goods and services, or can be
withdrawn as cash from a mobile money agent. Mobile money can therefore act as a means of
storing and transferring value in a secure and convenient way for unbanked people.
Resources: The discussion on E-commerce Business Models in this chapter is essentially based
on the text published in “Unpacking E-commerce: Business Models, Trends and Policies, OECD
Publishing, Paris” available at [Link]
(3) Imposition of a final withholding tax on gross basis in case of certain payments made for digital
goods or services provided by a foreign e-commerce provider or imposition of a equalisation levy
on consideration for certain digital transactions received by a non-resident from a resident or from
a non-resident having permanent establishment in other contracting state.
It was concluded that countries could introduce any of these options in their domestic laws as
additional safeguards against BEPS, provided they respect existing treaty obligations, or in their
bilateral tax treaties. The above options can be resorted to as an interim measure until a clear
solution emerges on taxing digital economy.
Taking into consideration the potential of new digital economy and the rapidly evolving nature of
business operations, it becomes necessary to address the challenges in terms of taxation of such
digital transactions. In order to arrive at a long term solution, the OECD along with the BEPS
Inclusive Framework is working on arriving at a consensus based solution to tackle the tax
challenges arising out of the digital economy as part of a ‘Unified Approach’ under Pillar O ne.
Consequent to the BEPS Action Report 1, a committee was constituted by the CBDT to evaluate the
alternatives suggested in the BEPS Action Report 1 for addressing the challenges arising on taxing
the digital economy. Pursuant to the recommendations of the Committee, Chapter VIII of the Finance
Act, 2016, titled "Equalisation Levy" was introduced. It provides for an equalisation levy
@6% of the amount of consideration for specified services received or receivable by a non -resident
12.10 DIRECT TAX LAWS
not having PE in India, from a resident in India who carries out business or profession, or from a
non-resident having PE in India.
In order to widen and deepen the equalisation levy net beyond online advertisement, its scope ha d
been extended by the Finance Act, 2020 to consideration received or receivable for e-commerce
supply or services made or provided or facilitated on or after 1.4.2020.
However, some stakeholders have raised concerns that the scope of equalisation levy on
e-commerce supply or services made or provided or facilitated is ambiguous and as a result it leads
to compliance burden. In view of this it is proposed that this equalisation levy shall not be applicable
to consideration received or receivable for e-commerce supply or services, on or after the 1st day
of August 2024. Further, vide Finance Act, 2025 the equalisation levy on specified s ervices also
abolished.
Accordingly, the Central Government has, vide notification no. 75/2022 dated 30.6.2022,
specified a token which qualifies to be a virtual digital asset as non-fungible token. However,
it shall not include a non-fungible token whose transfer results in transfer of ownership of
underlying tangible asset and the transfer of ownership of such underlying tangible asset is
legally enforceable.
(c) any other digital asset, as may be notified by the Central Government.
(d) any crypto-asset being a digital representation of value that relies on a cryptographically
secured distributed ledger or a similar technology to validate and secure transactions,
whether or not such asset is included in point (a) or (b) or (c) above.
However, the Central Government may, by notification, exclude any digital asset from the definition
of virtual digital asset subject to specified conditions.
Accordingly, the Central Government has, vide notification no. 74/2022 dated 30.6.2022, notified
that the following virtual digital assets would be excluded from the definition of virtual digital asset –
(i) Gift card or vouchers, being a record that may be used to obtain goods or services or a
discount on goods or services;
(ii) Mileage points, reward points or loyalty card, being a record given without direct monetary
consideration under an award, reward, benefit, loyalty, incentive, rebate or promotional
program that may be used or redeemed only to obtain goods or services or a discount on
goods or services;
(iii) Subscription to websites or platforms or application
Taxability of income from transfer of virtual digital assets [Section 115BBH]
(1) Tax rate on transfer of virtual digital asset – Where the total income of an assessee
includes any income from the transfer of any virtual digital asset, such income would be taxed
@30% under section 115BBH.
(2) No deduction allowed – In computing the income from transfer of virtual digital asset, no
deduction would be allowed under any provisions of the Act in respect of any expenditure or
allowance except cost of acquisition, if any. Further, no set off of any loss is allowed to the
assessee from such income.
(3) Set off or carry forward of loss from transfer of virtual digital asset not allowed – Loss
from transfer of virtual digital asset would not be allowed to be set off against income
computed under any provision of this Act to the assessee and such loss would not be allowed
to be carried forward to succeeding assessment years.
(4) Virtual digital asset need not to be a capital asset - The definition of “transfer” under
section 2(47) would apply to any virtual digital asset, whether it is a capital asset or not.
12.12 DIRECT TAX LAWS
(4) Non applicability of TDS under section 194S – No tax is required to be deducted under
section 194S, where the consideration is payable by the person referred to in column (2) of
the table below and aggregate value of such consideration during the financial year does not
exceed the threshold limit in the corresponding row of column (3) of the table below:
(1) Consideration is payable by Threshold limit
(2) (3)
(i) Specified person, being an individual or a Hindu undivided ≤ ` 50,000
family
- whose total sales, gross receipts or turnover from his
business or profession does not exceed ` 1 crore in case
of business or ` 50 lakhs in case of profession, during the
financial year immediately preceding the financial year in
which such virtual digital asset is transferred; or
- not having any income under the head “Profits and gains of
business or profession”.
(ii) Other than specified person mentioned in (i) above ≤ ` 10,000
(5) Due date of remittance to Government Account [Rule 30] and Furnishing statement and
certificate of TDS u/s 194S [Rules 31A and 31]
Sl. (1) (2) (3) (4)
No. Particulars Specified Person Exchange Any other person
(i) Rule 30 – Time of 30 days from the In case of tax deducted in March, on
payment to end of the month of or before 30 th April.
Government deduction In any other case, on or before 7 days
Account from the end of the month of
deduction.
(ii) Rule 31A –
Furnishing of
Statement of TDS
u/s 200(3)
Form Form 26QE Form 26QF Form 26Q
Time Within 30 days from Common for Exchange and any other
the end of the person
month of deduction Qtr ending Due date
30th June 31st July
30th Sep 31st Oct
31st Dec 31st Jan
31st March 31st May
12.14 DIRECT TAX LAWS
ILLUSTRATION 1
Compute the net income-tax payable by Mr. Abhinav, aged 32 years, who has the following
income for the A.Y.2026-27:
(i) Interest on fixed deposits with SBI (Gross) ` 1,10,000
(ii) Interest on savings bank account with SBI ` 35,000
(iii) Consideration for transfer of VDA ` 4,62,000
(iv) Cost of acquisition ` 21,000
(v) Expenses on transfer of VDA ` 1,000
Mr. Abhinav has exercised option to shift out of section 115BAC.
SOLUTION
Total income (excluding Income from transfer of VDA) is below the basic exemption limit of
` 2,50,000. Therefore, tax on income, other than income from VDA, is Nil. Income of
` 4,41,000 (` 4,62,000 – ` 21,000) from transfer of VDA would be taxable@30% (plus cess
of 4%). The tax on income from transfer of VDA would be ` 1,37,592, being 31.2% of
` 4,41,000. The expenses on transfer of VDA is not allowable as deduction.
Section 194S provides for deduction of tax on payment on transfer of virtual digital asset to
a resident at the rate of 1% of consideration. Hence, the transferee would have deducted tax
of ` 4,620, being 1% of ` 4,62,000.
Tax@10% under section 194A would have been deducted by SBI from ` 1,10,000. TDS
u/s 194A = ` 11,000
Net tax payable by Mr. Abhinav would be ` 1,21,972 [` 1,37,592 – ` 11,000 (TDS u/s 194A)
– ` 4,620 (TDS u/s 194S)].
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.15
a
ILLUSTRATION 2
Compute the net income-tax payable by Mr. Siddhanth, aged 24 years, who has the following
income for the A.Y.2026-27
(i) Income from Salaries (computed) ` 8,40,000
(ii) Interest on savings bank account with Axis Bank ` 12,000
(iii) Consideration on transfer of VDA to Mr. Harsh ` 50,000
(iv) Cost of acquisition of VDA transferred ` 5,000
Mr. Harsh is employed with ABC Ltd. on a monthly salary of ` 50,000. In addition, he has
interest on savings bank account with Bank of India.
Mr. Siddhanth has not exercised option to shift out of section 115BAC. Ignore TDS on income
other than VDA.
SOLUTION
Tax payable by Mr. Siddhanth for A.Y. 2026-27
Particulars Amount in `
Total income (excluding income from transfer of VDA) [` 8,40,000 + 8,52,000
` 12,000]
Income from VDA (` 50,000 – ` 5,000) 45,000
Total Income 8,97,000
Tax on income other than VDA
Upto ` 4,00,000 Nil
` 4,00,001 to ` 8,00,000 @5% ` 20,000
` 8,00,001 to ` 8,52,000 @10% ` 5,200 25,200
Tax on income from VDA @30% 13,500
38,700
Less: Rebate u/s 87A 25,200
13,500
Add: Health and education cess @ 4% 540
14,040
Less: TDS under section 194S [Mr. Harsh is a specified person since he
does not have income under the head “Profits and gains of business and
profession” and the consideration payable by him does not exceed
` 50,000. Accordingly, Mr. Harsh need not deduct tax u/s 194S on
Nil
consideration payable to Siddhanth]
Net tax payable 14,040
12.16 DIRECT TAX LAWS
ILLUSTRATION 3
Compute the net income-tax payable by Mr. Raj, aged 32 years, who has the following income
for the A.Y.2026-27
(i) Business loss (` 3,18,000)
(ii) Interest on fixed deposits with HDFC Bank ` 18,000
(iii) Consideration on transfer of VDA ` 6,20,000
(iv) Cost of acquisition of VDA transferred ` 20,000
SOLUTION
As per section 71, business loss of the current year can be set off against income from other
sources of that year. Therefore, business loss of ` 3,18,000 can be set off against interest of
` 18,000 from fixed deposits.
As per section 115BBH, business loss cannot be set off against income from transfer of VDA.
Therefore, balance business loss of ` 3,00,000 cannot be set off against Income from VDA
of ` 6,00,000 (` 6,20,000 – ` 20,000). The same has to be carried forward to A.Y.2027-28
for set-off against business income of that year.
Section 194S provides for deduction of tax on payment on transfer of virtual digital asset to
a resident at the rate of 1% of consideration. Hence, the transferee would have deducted tax
of ` 6,200, being 1% of ` 6,20,000.
(6) Non-applicability of section 203A - The provisions of section 203A containing the requirement
of obtaining TAN would not be applicable in case of specified person referred in 4(1).
(7) Cross application of section 194-O and section 194S - In case of a transaction where tax
is deductible under section 194-O along with the section 194S, then, the tax shall be deducted
under section 194S and not section 194-O.
(8) Power of the CBDT to issue guidelines – In case any difficulty arises in giving effect to the
provisions of this section, the CBDT is empowered to issue guidelines, with the prior approval
of the Central Government, for the purposes of removing the difficulty.
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.17
a
Every guideline issued by the CBDT shall be laid before each House of Parliament and
shall be binding on the income-tax authorities and on the person responsible for paying the
consideration on transfer of such virtual digital asset.
Accordingly, the CBDT has, with the prior approval of the Central Government, vide Circular
no. 13/2022 dated 22.6.2022, issued the following guidelines. These guidelines would apply
only in cases where transfer of virtual digital asset is taking place on or through an
Exchange. In other cases (like peer to peer and others) provisions of section 194S would
apply.
Question 1: Who is required to deduct tax when the transfer of virtual digital asset is
taking place on or through an Exchange and payment is made by the purchaser to
the Exchange (directly or through broker) and then from the Exchange it goes to
seller directly or through the broker?
Answer: According to section 194S, any person who is responsible for paying to any
resident any sum by way of consideration for transfer of virtual digital asset is required to
deduct tax.
Thus, in a peer to peer (i.e., direct buyer to seller) transaction, the buyer (i.e., person paying
the consideration) is required to deduct tax under section 194S. The tax so deducted is
required to be deposited with Government in accordance with the time and procedure
prescribed in the Act read with the relevant provisions of the Income -tax Rules, 1962.
After deduction, the deductor is required to furnish a quarterly statement (in Form No. 26Q)
for all such transactions of the quarter on or before the due date prescribed in the Income -
tax Rules, 1962. For specified person Form 26QE has been introduced.
It may be clarified that the TDS shall be on consideration for transfer of virtual digital asset
less GST. [Clarified by the CBDT vide circular no. 14/2022 dated 28.6.2022 for all other
transactions not conducted on or through Exchange]
However, if the transaction is taking place on or through an Exchange, there is a possibility
of tax deduction requirement under section 194S at multiple stages. Hence, in order to
remove difficulties for transactions taking place on or through an Exchang e, the following
clarifications have been issued by CBDT:-
(i) In a case where the transfer of virtual digital asset takes place on or through
an Exchange and the virtual digital asset being transferred is owned by a
person other than the Exchange: In this case, buyer would be crediting or making
payment to the Exchange (directly or through a broker). The Exchange, then, would
12.18 DIRECT TAX LAWS
be required to credit or make payment to the owner of virtual digital asset being
transferred, either directly or through a broker. Since there are multiple players, to
remove difficulty it has been clarified that:
1. Tax may be deducted under section 194S only by the Exchange which is
crediting or making payment to the seller (owner of the virtual digital asset
being transferred). In a case where broker owns the virtual digital asset, it is
the broker who is the seller. Hence, the amount of consideration being
credited or paid to the broker by the Exchange is also subject to tax deduction
under section 194S.
2. In a case where the credit/ payment between Exchange and the seller is
through a broker (and the broker is not seller), the responsibility to deduct tax
under section 194S shall be on both the Exchange and the broker. However, if
there is a written agreement between the Exchange and the broker that broker
shall be deducting tax on such credit/ payment, then broker alone may deduct
the tax under section 194S. The Exchange would be required to furnish a
quarterly statement (in Form 26QF) for all such transactions of the quarter on
or before the due date prescribed in the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
(ii) In a case where the transfer of virtual digital asset takes place on or through an
Exchange and the virtual digital asset being transferred is owned by such
Exchange: In this case, there are no multiple players. The buyer is required to deduct
tax under section 194S. However, there may be a practical issue as the buyer may not
know whether the virtual digital asset being transferred is owned by the Exchange or
not. Hence, there may be genuine doubt in the mind of buyer with regard to its
responsibility to deduct tax under section 194S. This difficulty would also be there if
the buyer is buying virtual digital asset from an Exchange through a broker.
To remove this difficulty, it has been clarified that while the primary responsibility to
deduct tax under section 194S, in this case, remains with the buyer or his broker, as
an alternative the Exchange may enter into a written agreement with the buyer o r his
broker that in regard to all such transactions, the Exchange would be paying the tax
on or before the due date for that quarter. The Exchange would be required to furnish
a quarterly statement (in Form 26QF) for all such transactions of the quarter o n or
before the due date prescribed in the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The Exchange would
also be required to furnish its income tax return and all these transactions must be
included in such return. If these conditions are complied with, the buyer or his brok er
would not be held as assessee in default under section 201 for these transactions.
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.19
a
(iii) The tax withheld in kind under section 194S and converted into INR shall be deposited
in the Government Account as per the time line and process given in the Income -tax
Rules 1962.
It has been clarified that there would not be any further TDS for converting the tax withheld
in kind in the form of virtual digital asset into INR or from one virtual digital asset to another
virtual digital asset and then into INR.
Question 3: Whether the provision of section 194Q is also applicable on transfer of
virtual digital asset?
Answer: Without going into the merit whether virtual digital asset is goods or not, it is
clarified that once tax is deducted under section 194S, tax would not be required to be
deducted under section 194Q. [Also clarified by the CBDT vide circular no. 14/2022
dated 28.6.2022 for all other transactions also not conducted on or through
Exchange]
Question 4: Whether the consideration for transfer of virtual digital asset shall be on
Gross basis after including GST/commission or it shall be on “net basis” after
exclusion of these items.
Answer: In order to remove difficulty, it is clarified that the tax required to be withheld under
section 194S shall be on the “net” consideration after excluding GST/charges levied by the
deductor for rendering service.
Question 5: In transactions where payment is being carried out through payment
gateways, there may be tax deduction twice. To illustrate that a person “XYZ” is
required to make payment to the seller for transfer of virtual digital asset. He makes
payment of ` 1,00,000 through digital platform of “ABC”. On these facts liability to
deduct tax under section 194S may fall on both “XYZ” and “ABC”. Is tax required to
be deducted by both?
Answer: In order to remove this difficulty, it is provided that in the above example, the
payment gateway will not be required to deduct tax under section 194S on a transaction, if
the tax has been deducted by the person (“XYZ”) required to make deduction under se ction
194S. Hence, in the above example, if “XYZ” has deducted tax under section 194S on
` 1,00,000, “ABC” will not be required to deduct tax under section 194S on the same
transaction. To facilitate proper implementation, “ABC” may take an undertaking from “XYZ”
regarding deduction of tax.
TAXATION OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS 12.21
a
Questions
1. Explain the core reasons for difference between the e-commerce transactions and the
traditional business transactions causing difficulty to tax the income of e -commerce
transactions.
2. E-commerce transactions have replaced concepts generally associated with international
transactions traditionally. Discuss briefly the taxation issues involving such transactions.
3. From the following details compute the taxable income of Mr. Mohan for the sale and
purchase of Bitcoins and NFT made during the year:
Date Particulars Units Amount (`)
June 15, 2025 Purchase (Bitcoin) 5000 50,000
July 15, 2025 Sale (Bitcoin) 2500 25,500
July 20, 2025 Sale (Bitcoin) 2500 28,750
Expenses Incurred on Sale of Bitcoin 15,000
August 1, 2025 Purchase (NFT) 10000 1,50,000
August 16, 2025 Sale (NFT) 6000 89,000
August 31, 2025 Sale (NFT) 4000 56,000
Expenses Incurred on Sale of NFT 18,000
Answers
1. The core reasons for difference between e-commerce transactions and traditional business
transactions causing difficulty to tax the income from e-commerce transactions under the
Income-tax Act, 1961 are absence of national boundaries, no requirement of phy sical
presence of goods and no requirement of physical delivery (in certain cases). Since e -
commerce transactions are completed in cyberspace, it is often not clear as to the place
where the transaction is effected, thereby causing difficulty in implementing source rule
taxation.
12.22 DIRECT TAX LAWS
Note: VDA income would be taxed @30% under section 115BBH without any deduction of
expenses.