TOPIC 1: SHOULD PEOPLE BELIEVE IN ONLINE

REVIEWS? WHY OR WHY NOT?

With the rapid growth of e-commerce and digital platforms, online reviews have become an
important source of information for consumers when making purchasing decisions. Although
online reviews can be useful, people should not rely on them completely.
One reason why online reviews are worth considering is that they provide insights based on
real user experiences. Through these reviews, consumers can learn about the quality of
products, customer service, and possible drawbacks before making a purchase. This is
especially helpful for people who do not have direct access to a product or service.
Furthermore, reading reviews can save time and money by helping buyers avoid poor-quality
options.
However, there are several reasons why online reviews should be treated with caution. Many
reviews reflect personal opinions and expectations, which may differ greatly from one
individual to another. In addition, fake reviews can be exaggerated or give negative comments
about the product or service, making them less reliable. As a result, depending solely on
online feedback may lead to incorrect judgments and disappointment.
In conclusion, online reviews can be a helpful reference, but should not be fully trusted.
Consumers should be smart buyers and users, using online reviews as a general guide and
combining them with personal research, and buying them in need, to make better decisions.

WOULD YOU CHANGE YOUR FOOD SHOPPING HABITS

BASED ON WHAT YOU LEARNED ABOUT THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE FOOD SYSTEM OR
BECAUSE OF ITS BRAND NAME? EXPLAIN THE REASON
FOR YOUR CHOICE.

In recent years, consumers have become more aware of how the food system affects both the
environment and human health. When deciding whether to change my food shopping habits, I
would be far more influenced by what I learn about the environmental impact of food
production rather than by brand names.

One major reason for this choice relates to the long-term environmental consequences of the
food system. Food production often begins with large-scale farming, which can lead to
deforestation as forests are cleared to create agricultural land. This process not only destroys
natural habitats but also contributes to climate change by reducing the Earth’s ability to
absorb carbon dioxide. In addition, the transportation of food over long distances increases
carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles, which worsens air pollution and accelerates global
warming. Choosing food products with a lower environmental footprint, such as locally
produced or sustainably farmed items, can therefore help reduce these long-term
environmental damages.

Another important factor is the short-term impact of the food system on food safety and
human health. Many mass-produced foods contain high levels of chemicals and pesticides,
which may remain in food products and pose risks to consumers. Exposure to these
substances has been linked to serious health problems, including food poisoning and even
long-term illnesses such as cancer. By paying attention to how food is produced rather than
focusing on brand reputation, consumers can make safer choices that protect their health and
well-being.

In conclusion, while brand names may offer familiarity, environmental impact is a far more
meaningful reason to change food shopping habits. Considering both long-term
environmental effects and short-term health risks encourages more responsible consumption
and contributes to a more sustainable food system.

IMAGINE THAT YOU HAD TO CHOOSE A CAREER

TODAY, WHAT WOULD YOU CHOOSE? AND EXPLAIN
THE REASONS FOR YOUR CHOICE? WHAT STEPS WOULD
YOU NEED TO TAKE TO ACHIEVE THAT CAREER GOAL?

Nowadays, choosing a career is one of the most important decisions for young people, as it

In conclusion, if I had to choose a career today, I would choose logistics and import–export
because of its importance in global trade, strong career prospects in Vietnam, and its
suitability for my personal strengths. By focusing on education, language skills, and practical
experience, I believe I can successfully achieve this career goal and develop myself in a
competitive and international working environment.

Choosing a career is one of the most significant decisions in a person’s life, as it strongly
influences both professional development and personal satisfaction. If I had to choose a career
today, I would choose to work in the field of logistics and import–export, and there are
several reasons as well as clear steps to achieve this goal.

The primary reason for choosing logistics and import–export is its crucial role in global trade
and economic growth. This field involves managing the movement of goods across borders,
including transportation, customs clearance, and supply chain coordination. In an export-
oriented economy like Vietnam, where international trade is expanding rapidly, the demand
for skilled professionals in logistics continues to increase. For example, during global
disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic, logistics specialists played a vital role in
maintaining supply chains and minimizing delays, which highlights the importance of this
career.

In addition, this profession suits my personal strengths and interests. Logistics work requires
problem-solving skills, adaptability, and effective communication, especially when dealing
with unexpected issues such as shipping delays or regulatory changes. I find such dynamic
and challenging environments motivating rather than stressful, which makes this career
particularly appealing to me.

To achieve this career goal, several steps are necessary. In the initial, I would focus on
building a strong academic foundation in international trade and logistics-related subjects. At
the same time, improving my English proficiency and learning a new language are essential,
as it is the main working language in this field. Finally, gaining practical experience through
internships at logistics or freight-forwarding companies would help me apply theoretical
knowledge to real-world situations.
In conclusion, logistics and import–export is a career that offers both strong prospects and
personal fulfillment. With proper education, language skills, and practical experience, this
career goal is both realistic and achievable.

ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST VACCINES IN GENERAL?

WHY OR WHY NOT?

Vaccines have long been a subject of public debate, particularly in recent years as health
crises have drawn global attention to medical science. Personally, I am strongly in favor of
vaccines in general because of their effectiveness in preventing diseases and protecting public
health.

One major reason for supporting vaccines is their proven ability to prevent the spread of
infectious diseases. Vaccination helps individuals build immunity without experiencing
severe illness, which significantly reduces infection and mortality rates. Diseases such as
measles, polio, and smallpox were once widespread and deadly, but they have been controlled
or even eliminated in many countries due to large-scale vaccination programs. This
demonstrates that vaccines are not only effective on an individual level but also essential for
safeguarding entire communities.

Another important argument is that vaccines contribute to herd immunity, which protects
vulnerable groups in society. Not everyone can be vaccinated, including infants, elderly
people, or individuals with weakened immune systems. When a large proportion of the
population is vaccinated, the transmission of diseases is limited, indirectly protecting those
who are most at risk. For example, widespread vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic
helped reduce hospital overload and allowed societies to gradually return to normal life.

In conclusion, I strongly support vaccines because they are a scientifically proven and socially
responsible way to prevent diseases. By protecting both individuals and communities,
vaccination plays a crucial role in maintaining public health and ensuring long-term social
stability.

WRITE AN ESSAY ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT WHERE

YOU LIVE. IS IT AN URBAN, SUBURBAN OR RURAL AREA?
IS THERE ANY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS THERE? IF
POSSIBLE, SUGGEST SOME WAYS YOU THINK PEOPLE
CAN DO TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT. (ABOUT 250
WORDS)

The environment in which people live plays an important role in their quality of life and well-
being. Currently, I live in an urban area in Vietnam where economic development and
population growth have significantly influenced the local environment. While urban areas
offer many conveniences, they also face several environmental challenges.

One major environmental problem in my area is air pollution. The large number of
motorbikes and cars on the roads produces a significant amount of exhaust fumes, which
contribute to poor air quality. In addition, rapid urbanization has led to the construction of
many buildings and infrastructure projects, creating dust and noise pollution. Another issue
is the increasing amount of household waste. Because the population in urban areas is very
dense, a large volume of plastic waste and food packaging is generated every day, which puts
pressure on the local waste management system.

To address these problems, both individuals and communities can take several practical
actions. First, people should reduce their use of private vehicles and instead use public
transportation, bicycles, or electric vehicles to reduce air pollution. Second, individuals can
adopt environmentally friendly habits such as reducing plastic use, recycling waste, and
separating garbage at home. Finally, local communities and authorities should raise public
awareness through environmental campaigns and encourage greener lifestyles.

In conclusion, although urban areas provide many opportunities and conveniences, they also
face serious environmental problems such as air pollution and waste management issues. By
adopting more environmentally responsible behaviors, individuals and communities can
contribute to protecting and improving the environment in the long term.

Outline: Water pollution in rural area

Nowadays, the environment where people live plays a very important role in their health and
quality of life. I currently live in a rural area in Vietnam, where the surroundings are generally
peaceful and closer to nature compared to large cities. Although rural areas usually have
cleaner air and more green spaces, they still face certain environmental challenges – water
pollution

The place where I live is a typical rural community surrounded by farmland, rivers, and small
villages. The population density is relatively low, and most people work in agriculture, such
as growing rice, vegetables, or raising animals. Compared to urban areas, there are fewer tall
buildings and much less traffic.

For example, many families depend on nearby rivers or canals for farming and daily
activities. The natural scenery, including rice fields and trees, creates a peaceful and relaxing
atmosphere. Overall, rural life is generally quieter and closer to nature than life in big cities.

However, one environmental problem that sometimes occurs in rural areas is water pollution.
This issue mainly comes from agricultural activities. Farmers often use chemical fertilizers
and pesticides to increase crop production, but these substances can flow into rivers and
canals after rainfall.

As a result, the water quality may gradually decrease and become unsafe for daily use. For
instance, in some areas, polluted water can affect irrigation systems or harm fish and other
aquatic life. If this problem continues for a long time, it may also pose risks to human health.

To reduce water pollution, several practical solutions can be applied.

First, farmers should try to reduce the use of harmful chemicals and adopt more
environmentally friendly farming methods, such as organic fertilizers. This can help protect
both soil and water quality.

Second, local communities should raise awareness about environmental protection. People
need to understand that protecting water sources is essential for their own health and for
future generations.

Finally, local authorities can also support farmers by providing training programs on
sustainable agriculture and environmental management.

In conclusion, although rural areas offer a peaceful environment and natural landscapes, they
are not completely free from environmental problems. In my opinion, water pollution caused
by agricultural activities is one of the main issues in rural communities. By promoting
sustainable farming practices and raising environmental awareness, people can better protect
their water resources and maintain a healthy living environment.

IS IT A GOOD IDEA TO ADD MODERN FEATURE TO

HISTORICAL BUILDINGS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE
WITH THIS STATEMENT? EXPLAIN YOUR CHOICE AND
EVIDENCES/ EXAMPLES TO SUPPORT.

Historical buildings play a vital role in preserving a nation’s cultural identity and historical
values. While some argue that adding modern features to these structures can make them
more functional, I disagree with this view because such changes may damage their
authenticity and historical significance.

One major reason for opposing modernization is that it can lose the original character of
historical buildings. These structures were built in specific historical contexts, reflecting the
architectural styles and cultural values of their time. Introducing modern elements such as
glass extensions, elevators, or electronic systems may alter their appearance and reduce their
historical value. For example, if a centuries-old temple is modified with modern materials, it
may lose the traditional aesthetic that makes it unique and meaningful.

Another important concern is that modernization may lead to the over-commercialization of

historical sites. In many cases, buildings are converted into hotels, restaurants, or shopping
areas to generate profit. While this may bring economic benefits, it can also turn cultural
heritage into commercial products, reducing their educational and historical importance. For
instance, tourists may focus more on entertainment or shopping rather than learning about the
history behind the building.

In conclusion, I believe that adding modern features to historical buildings is not a good idea,
as it can damage their authenticity and encourage excessive commercialization. Instead,
efforts should focus on preserving these structures in their original form to maintain their
cultural and historical value for future generations.
NOWADAYS PEOPLE ARE ENCOURAGED TO USE
ALTERNATIVES TO FOSSIL FUELS BECAUSE THERE IS A
STRONG BELLEF ON ITS BENEFITS. SO DO YOU AGREE
OR DISAGREE WITH THIS TENDENCY? EXPLAIN YOUR
IDEAS WITH ITS ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES AS
WELL AS GIVE EXAMPLES TO SUPPORT.

In recent years, people have been increasingly encouraged to use alternatives to fossil fuels
due to a strong belief in their benefits. I largely agree with this trend because renewable
energy sources offer significant environmental advantages, although they also present certain
challenges.

One major advantage of using alternatives to fossil fuels is their positive impact on the
environment. Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydropower produce little
or no greenhouse gas emissions, which helps reduce air pollution and slow down climate
change. For example, many countries have invested in solar energy to decrease their
dependence on coal and oil, resulting in cleaner air and improved public health. In addition,
renewable energy is sustainable, meaning it can be used over a long period without being
depleted.

However, there are also some disadvantages associated with alternative energy sources. One
key issue is the high initial cost of installation and infrastructure. Building solar panels or
wind farms requires significant investment, which may be difficult for developing countries.
Another limitation is that some renewable sources depend on natural conditions. For instance,
solar energy is less effective in areas with limited sunlight, while wind power depends on
consistent wind patterns. These factors can make energy supply less stable compared to
traditional fossil fuels.

In conclusion, I agree that people should be encouraged to use alternatives to fossil fuels due
to their environmental benefits and long-term sustainability. Despite some drawbacks, such as
high costs and dependence on natural conditions, renewable energy remains a promising
solution for a cleaner and more sustainable future.

MANY PEOPLE HAVE A STRONG BELIEF THAT STREET

ART AND GRAFFITI SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE
ILLEGAL. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS
STATEMENT? EXPLAIN THE REASONS AND GIVE
EXAMPLES OR EVIDENCES TO SUPPORT YOUR CHOICE.

Street art and graffiti have become increasingly visible in many urban areas worldwide.
Although some people argue that these forms of expression should be considered illegal, I
largely disagree because responsible street art can provide cultural, artistic, and economic
benefits to society.

One reason why many people oppose graffiti is that it can damage both public and private
property. In many cases, individuals paint on walls, trains, or buildings without permission,
which may create an untidy and unpleasant environment. Removing illegal graffiti often
places a financial burden on local authorities. Furthermore, uncontrolled graffiti can
contribute to visual pollution and make neighborhoods appear unsafe. Therefore, acts of
vandalism should certainly be regulated by law.

Nevertheless, not all street art should be viewed negatively. In many cities, public murals
have become valuable forms of artistic and cultural expression. Artists often use urban spaces
to communicate social messages, celebrate local identity, and brighten otherwise dull
environments. For example, cities such as Berlin and Melbourne are famous for their street
art, which attracts thousands of tourists every year. In addition, some governments have
introduced legal painting zones, allowing artists to express themselves creatively without
damaging property.

In conclusion, I do not believe that all street art and graffiti should be illegal. While
unauthorized vandalism must be controlled, well-managed street art can make cities more
attractive, culturally rich, and socially engaging

DO YOU THINK PARENTS SHOULD STOP PROVIDING FOR

THEIR CHILDREN AT SOME POINT IN THEIR LIVES. WHY
AND WHY NOT?

Parents naturally want to support their children and help them achieve a stable and successful
life. However, I believe that parents should stop fully providing for their children once they
become adults because too much dependence can prevent young people from developing
responsibility and important life skills.

One important reason why parents should stop providing complete financial support is that
young adults need to learn independence in order to mature. If parents continue paying for
everything, children may become overly dependent and expect others to solve their problems
in the future. In contrast, when young people are responsible for their own expenses and
decisions, they learn essential skills such as budgeting, time management, and problem-
solving. These experiences help them become more confident and prepared for adult life. For
example, many university students who work part-time jobs often become more responsible
because they understand the value of money and hard work.

Another reason is that continuous parental support can create pressure for parents and reduce
children’s motivation. Many parents work hard for years and should be able to focus on their
own financial security, especially as they grow older. If they continue supporting adult
children financially, they may face stress or economic difficulties in the future. At the same
time, children who receive constant support may lack ambition and become less motivated to
build their own careers or achieve financial stability. Although parents should still provide
emotional advice and guidance, adult children should gradually learn to manage their own
lives independently.

In conclusion, I believe parents should stop fully providing for their children when they reach
adulthood. Encouraging independence helps young people become more responsible while
also reducing unnecessary pressure on parents.