4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
Deflection
Eurocode 2 has two alternative methods for checking deflection. Either:
a limiting span-to-depth ratio may be used or
the theoretical deflection can be assessed using the expressions given in the Code
The span-to-effective-depth (L/d) method
In simple terms, the current EN1992 L/d method means verifying that:
Allowable L/d = N x K x F1 x F2 x F3 ≥ actual L/d
where
N= basic span-to-effective-depth ratio derived for K = 1.0 and p'. from the formulae :
if ρ ≤ ρ0
N = L/d = K[11 + 1.5fck0.5 ρ 0/ ρ + 3.2 fck0.5(ρ 0/ ρ – 1)1.5]
or if ρ > ρ0
N = L/d = K[11 + 1.5 fck 0.5 ρ0/( ρ – ρ') + fck0.5(ρ'/ ρ0)0.5/12]
For ρ’ =0, N may be determined from Figure 1
where
L= span
d= effective depth
ρ0 = fck0.5/1000
ρ = As,req/bd
[Link] 1/6
4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
ρ’ = As2/bd
K= factor to account for structural system. See Table 1
F1 = factor to account for flanged sections.
When beff/bw = 1.0, factor F1 = 1.0. When beff/bw is greater than 3.0, factor F1 = 0.80. For
values of beff/bw between 1.0 and 3.0, interpolation may be used. .
F2 = factor to account for brittle partitions in association with long spans. Generally
F2 = 1.0 but if brittle partitions are liable to be damaged by excessive deflection, F2
should be determined as follows:
a) in flat slabs in which the longer span is greater than 8.5 m, F2 = 8.5/leff
b) in beams and other slabs with spans in excess of 7.0 m, F2 = 7.0/leff
F3 = factor to account for service stress in tensile reinforcement = 310/ss1,3a.
It is considered conservative to assume that 310/ss = 500 As,prov/(fykAs,req)
where
ss = tensile stress in reinforcement at mid-span (at support for cantilevers) under
design load at SLS.
Notes
1. In MC2010 this expression is given in Expression (7.6-23) as 250/ss = 500
As,prov/(fykAs,req)
2. Factors F1, F2 and F3 have been used here for convenience, they are not symbols
used in EN1992-1-1.
3. According to the Notes to Table NA.5 of the UK NA,
a. the ratio, F3, is restricted to ≤ 1.5 where ss is calculated using the characteristic
value of serviceability load.
b. Warnings are given that the values of K may not be appropriate when formwork
is struck at an early age.
c. L/d may not exceed 40K.
Figure 7 Basic span-to-effective-depth ratios, N, for K = 1, ρ' = 0
[Link] 2/6
4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
Extract from How to Design Concrete Structures using Eurocode 2 (page 27, Figure 5)
Table 1
K factors to be applied to basic ratios of span to effective depth for structural system
Element K
Simply supported beams or slabs 1.0
End span of continuous beams or slabs 1.3
Interior spans of continuous beams or slabs 1.5
Flat slabs (based on longer span) 1.2
Cantilevers 0.4
The use of L/d method ‘will be adequate for avoiding deflection problems in normal
circumstances’
[Link] 3/6
4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
The rigorous method of assessing deflection
A section will crack if it experiences a serviceability moment exceeding its moment capacity at
the time, Mcr(t). If a section is cracked, then its inertia is much less than that of the uncracked
section and so curvature is much greater in cracked sections. Cracked sections and greater
degrees of cracking lead to larger curvatures and deflections. See Figure 3.
Figure 3 Typical moment - curvature response
Economically-designed horizontal elements act somewhere between wholly uncracked and
wholly cracked. Slabs tend to be less highly stressed and are cracked along only part of their
spans. Beams tend to be highly stressed and cracked along much of their spans. Actions are
applied at different times and these actions may or not cause cracking depending upon the
flexural tensile strength of the concrete at the time. Once cracked, a section is assumed to stay
cracked but some tensile stiffening occurs in the concrete between cracks. So the mean inertia
of the segment is somewhere between those for wholly un-cracked or fully cracked sections.
When considering curvatures, these different actions incur different creep coefficients, which
affect the applicable effective modulus of the concrete used in assessing curvatures.
EN 1992-1-1 (and MC2010) states that an adequate prediction of behaviour and the mean
curvature in a discreet element is given by
1/rm = ζ(ψ2+ψ2cs) + (1- ζ)(ψ1+ψ1cs)
where
[Link] 4/6
4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
rm = mean radius
z = 1- b(Mcr/M)2
where
b = 1.0 for short –term and 0.5 for long-term loading. For construction loads,
conservatively b = 0.70[14]
Mcr = cracking moment
M = Moment
y1 = M/EceffI1 = curvature of uncracked section
y2 = M/EceffI2 = curvature of cracked section
where
Eceff = Ecm/(1+ f)
where
Ecm = modulus at 28 days
f = creep coefficient
I1, I2 = inertias
y1cs, y2cs = shrinkage curvatures
Curvature in a simply supported slab
[Link] 5/6
4/4/26, 1:06 AM Deflection
This ‘rigorous’ method is described in greater detail elsewhere e.g. The Concrete Society
publication: TR58: Deflections in concrete slabs and beams, 2005, or How to design concrete
structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection Calculations. It is backed by site-based research.
Greater accuracy may be achieved by considering small increments of span and computing
relevant curvatures and thus overall deflections. The method involves numerical integration,
which is tedious by hand but can, of course, be undertaken by computer, notably by
spreadsheet software.
[Link] 6/6