Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
1
General Education Courses
Course Code | Course Title | No. of units
PECOSY030 People and The Earth’s Ecosystems (3 units)
Course Outcomes
1. Analyzed the implications of environmental change for people, communities, flora and wildlife
2. Communicated findings with reference to broader debates within different disciplines
Module 5: Human Evolution
Lesson 5, Human Evolution examines how humans evolved from early primate ancestors through gradual
biological and cultural changes. It focuses on fossil evidence, environmental influences, and key
developments such as upright walking, increasing brain size, and tool-making. Students will understand
that human evolution is a branching process involving multiple hominin species, eventually leading to the
emergence of modern humans.
Learning Objectives: At the end of the module, students must have:
1. Explain the concept of human evolution and the evolutionary relationship between humans and
other primates.
2. Describe the development and significance of bipedalism as a defining characteristic of early
hominins.
3. Analyze the major biological and cultural changes in Humans
Learning Evidence: Online Quiz
Key Concepts with Learning Activities:
Introduction
Human evolution refers to the
development of humans on Earth from
primate ancestors that are now extinct. From
a zoological perspective, we belong to the
species Homo sapiens, characterized as a
culture-bearing, bipedal species that
primarily inhabits terrestrial environments
and is believed to have originated in Africa
roughly 315,000 years ago. Currently, we are
the sole surviving members of what many
zoologists classify as the human tribe,
Hominini, yet there is a wealth of fossil
evidence showing that we were preceded by
various other hominins for millions of years,
including Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, and
several species within the genus Homo. Our
species also coexisted for a period with at
least one other member of our genus, known
as H. neanderthalensis, commonly referred to
as the Neanderthals.
Scientists have agreed that humans, extinct hominins, and other apes have evolutionary links dating
back to Charles Darwin's works On the Origin of Species and The Descent of Man. However, Darwin did
not suggest that humans descended directly from modern apes; rather, modern science reveals that
humans and apes had a common ancestor millions of years ago. This origin was not a "missing
link," but rather a branching point from which many lineages emerged. Because fossil evidence is
insufficient and complex, human development is better depicted as a "family bush" rather than a clear,
linear family tree leading directly to Homo sapiens.
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
2
General Education Courses
Fossil specimens will always be the major source for tracing the history of human evolution. Certainly,
the fossil record from Africa and Eurasia shows that, unlike today, more than one species of our family
coexisted during most of human history. The nature of specific fossil specimens and species can be
accurately described, as can the location where they were discovered and the period during which they
lived; however, questions about how species lived and why they may have died out or evolved into
other species can only be answered by developing scenarios.
Background and beginnings in the Miocene
Human evolutionary roots likely trace back to apelike primates of the Middle to Late Miocene Epoch
(about 16–5 million years ago), with genetic evidence favoring a Late Miocene origin. Several fossil
primates—such as Kenyapithecus, Griphopithecus, Dryopithecus, Graecopithecus, Samburupithecus,
Sahelanthropus, and Orrorin—have been proposed as possible ancestors of early hominins. However,
there is no clear agreement among scientists about which species directly led to humans. Different
evolutionary models suggest varying relationships among early humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and
orangutans, with some evidence indicating that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees and
bonobos than to gorillas.
During the Miocene, global climate changes transformed forests into more open woodlands and
grasslands. These environmental shifts encouraged new adaptations, especially in movement and diet.
Early hominins likely consumed tough plant materials rather than relying heavily on meat, as shown by
their large, thick-enameled teeth.
A key development during the Pliocene was bipedalism, or walking on two legs, which became the
defining characteristic of the human lineage (Hominini). This adaptation allowed early humans to thrive
in diverse and increasingly open habitats, marking a major step in human evolution.
Striding through the Pliocene
The anatomy of bipedalism
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
3
General Education Courses
Humans are unique among mammals because we are exclusively adapted to upright, striding
bipedalism, unlike other mammals that hop or waddle. This ability developed naturally from the primate
body plan, which already emphasized hind-limb movement and upright sitting. Early steps toward
bipedalism likely involved standing, reaching, and squatting rather than long-distance walking.
Human posture relies more on skeletal structure and ligaments than constant muscle use. When
standing, the hip and knee joints fully extend, aligning the legs into vertical columns, allowing balance
with minimal effort. Over time, obligatory terrestrial bipedalism produced major anatomical differences
between hominins and great apes, especially in the pelvis and lower limbs.
Key changes include a shorter, broader pelvis with curved ilia and a wide sacrum, which stabilize the
body while walking. Humans also have short ischia and long legs for efficient striding, while apes have
long ischia suited for climbing. The human femur angles inward toward the knees, keeping them close
together and helping maintain balance—an important fossil indicator of bipedalism.
Human feet are also specialized: they have a strong heel, aligned big toe, and a stable arch for support
and propulsion. Unlike apes, whose feet are adapted for grasping, human feet are built solely for
bearing weight and efficient walking, making human footprints distinct from those of other primates.
The fossil evidence
By about 3.5 million years ago, Australopithecus
afarensis was already an effective bipedal walker. This is
supported not only by skeletal evidence but also by the
famous 27.5-meter Laetoli footprints in Tanzania, which
closely resemble those of modern barefoot humans.
However, despite their humanlike feet, other parts of their
bodies still retained apelike traits.
Even earlier hominins show signs of bipedalism. Fossils of
Orrorin tugenensis (about 6 million years old) and
Ardipithecus ramidus indicate upright walking. In
Ardipithecus, the centrally positioned foramen magnum (the
hole at the base of the skull) suggests an upright posture.
Similarly, Australopithecus anamensis shows skeletal traits
linked to bipedalism.
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
4
General Education Courses
Although these hominins were obligate bipeds on the
ground, many—including A. afarensis—still had curved
fingers, long arms, and other adaptations for climbing
trees. Later species such as Australopithecus africanus and
Paranthropus robustus show similar locomotor patterns.
By 2.5 million years ago, some hominins had developed
longer femurs suited for efficient striding, though they
retained some arboreal features.
Early members of the genus Homo, such as Homo habilis,
still displayed a mix of tree-climbing and walking
adaptations. Later species, including Homo
heidelbergensis and the Neanderthal, had broader
pelvises adapted for supporting larger brains and giving
birth to larger-headed infants.
Foot evolution in early Homo is poorly documented, but 1.5-million-year-old footprints from Kenya
suggest that by the time of Homo erectus, the modern human style of walking—and related body-
cooling adaptations—was already well established. Overall, bipedalism evolved gradually, with early
hominins combining upright walking with retained climbing abilities before fully humanlike locomotion
emerged.
Theories of bipedalism
Many theories attempt to explain why humans evolved bipedalism, but none fully explains it. Early
ideas, including those of Charles Darwin, suggested that walking upright freed the hands for tool use and
weapons. However, the earliest known stone tools (about 3.3 million years old) appeared long after
hominins were already bipedal, weakening that argument.
1. Savanna Hypothesis (Traditional View): As forests shrank, early hominins adapted to open,
treeless environments, making upright walking more efficient for traveling long distances and
spotting predators.
2. Postural Feeding Hypothesis: Proposes bipedalism began in trees as a way to reach food, with
hominins standing to grab fruit or stabilize themselves on branches.
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
5
General Education Courses
3. Energy Efficiency Model: Bipedalism uses less energy than knuckle-walking for covering long
distances between separated food sources in a changing climate.
4. Provisioning/Social Model: Suggests males walked upright to carry food back to females,
allowing for increased reproduction and, subsequently, the evolution of monogamous bonds.
5. Carrying/Tool-Use Theory: Argues that freeing the hands from locomotion allowed for the
carrying of tools, food, or infants, providing a survival advantage.
6. Aquatic/Wading Theory (Minority View): Suggests that early foraging in shallow water (swamps,
lakeshores) favored upright posture.
Humans also evolved unique cooling mechanisms that supported long-distance movement in hot
environments. Unlike apes, humans have abundant sweat glands, sparse body hair, and a thorax freed
from weight-bearing stresses, allowing flexible breathing while running. These features likely developed
as early Homo adapted to open tropical habitats, making efficient long-distance trekking and endurance
running possible.
Hominin habitats
During the Late Miocene and into the Pliocene (about 11.2–2.6 million years ago), global climate
change reduced forests and expanded open habitats. In Africa, primates—including early hominins—
diversified, while in Eurasia most hominins disappeared. The only surviving descendants of Late Miocene
Asian primates were species such as Gigantopithecus blacki and modern orangutans and gibbons.
African hominins adapted to a wide range of environments. Ardipithecus ramidus lived in woodland
habitats in Ethiopia. Australopithecus afarensis occupied mixed environments of forest, woodland,
savanna, and bushland, while Australopithecus anamensis lived in dry woodland areas near rivers. Other
species such as Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, and robust australopiths like
Paranthropus boisei and Paranthropus robustus inhabited varied settings ranging from grasslands and
lake margins to woodlands and cave-associated environments. Climate fluctuations, especially shifts
between moist and dry periods, influenced where species such as Homo habilis and P. boisei lived.
One major outcome of these environmental changes was the refinement of efficient bipedal walking. As
species of the genus Homo evolved, they expanded out of Africa into Eurasia and later returned to
Africa. This geographic spread was accompanied by advances such as more sophisticated stone tools,
increased brain size, and reduced jaw and tooth size. Overall, shifting Pliocene environments played a
key role in shaping hominin evolution, mobility, and adaptation.
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
6
General Education Courses
Tools, hands, and heads in the Pliocene and Pleistocene
Refinements in hand structure
Early hominins depended heavily on their
hands for gathering food and transporting materials,
since they lacked tools and carrying containers.
Without advanced technology, they needed nearby
water sources and could carry only limited items.
Animal skins may also have been useful for protection
against weather.
By about 3.3 million years ago, some hominins in
eastern Africa were making simple stone tools—such
as hammers, anvils, and cutting flakes—even before
the earliest confirmed members of the genus Homo
appeared. These early tools were likely made by
species such as Australopithecus afarensis or
Kenyanthropus platyops. At first, hominins may have
used naturally occurring stones, similar to how
modern apes use simple tools today.
Over time, the human hand evolved specialized
features for improved tool use. Compared with
great apes, humans developed a stronger, more
independent thumb muscle (flexor pollicis longus),
broad sensitive fingertips, a fully opposable
thumb, and specialized joints that allow precise
tip-to-tip gripping and powerful grasping.
Fossils show gradual improvement in hand
structure. A. afarensis could grip and throw
objects but lacked a fully modern power grip. By
1.8 million years ago, Homo habilis had flatter
fingertips and stronger thumb muscles, better
suited for toolmaking, as seen in finds from
Olduvai Gorge. Evidence from South Africa
suggests that by this time at least one hominin species had highly developed thumbs adapted for stone
tool use.
Later species, including Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, and eventually Homo
sapiens and Neanderthal, likely refined these adaptations further, although fossil evidence of their
hands is incomplete. Overall, the evolution of the human hand was closely tied to increasing reliance on
stone tools, enabling more complex manipulation and technological advancement.
Increasing brain size
Because fossil skulls are more complete than hand bones, scientists can more easily trace
increases in brain size alongside the archaeological record of the Paleolithic Period (about 3.3 million to
10,000 years ago), also called the Old Stone Age. The Paleolithic came before the Mesolithic (Middle
Stone Age) and is itself divided into Early, Middle, and Late phases, which can sometimes cause
confusion.
Brain expansion in hominins closely parallels improvements in stone tool technology, leading some
researchers to link larger brains directly to technological advances. However, other important factors
may also have contributed to increasing brain size, including:
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
7
General Education Courses
1. Dietary Shift: The adoption of cooked food provided higher calories, potentially allowing for a
larger brain (an energetically expensive organ) at the expense of gut size.
2. Environmental Challenges: Rapid climate fluctuations during the last 800,000 years likely forced
adaptation and cognitive development.
3. Social Complexity: The need to interact in larger, more complex social groups stimulated
cognitive growth.
4. Structural Changes: Beyond mere volume, the human brain evolved a higher density of neurons
and disproportionate expansion of the frontal and parietal cortex.
5. Genetic Basis: Researchers have identified "Human Accelerated Regions" (HARs)—sections of
DNA that evolved rapidly in humans and are thought to regulate brain development.
6. Brain vs. Body Size: While Homo sapiens have the largest brains relative to body size, some
species like Neanderthals had similar absolute brain sizes, though different, non-linear growth
patterns.
7. Costs: Larger brains imposed high metabolic and, for early hominids, dangerous survival risks,
leading to biological limits on further size increases.
Stone tool development during the Paleolithic showed both long periods of little change and times of
innovation. Because technologies varied by region and time—and because some tools may have been
made from perishable plant materials—it is difficult to directly connect increasing brain size with
technological complexity or fully modern cognitive abilities. In many cases, it is also unclear which
hominin species produced specific tool industries, even when fossils are found nearby.
The discovery of Homo floresiensis in 2004 on Flores Island, Indonesia, further challenges the
idea that larger brains equal greater cognitive ability. This small-bodied species had a brain size similar
to chimpanzees and small australopiths, yet it produced stone tools comparable to those of Early
Pleistocene hominins and survived in a challenging environment alongside giant rats, dwarf elephants,
and Komodo dragons from at least 38,000 to about 18,000 years ago.
If H. floresiensis is indeed a distinct species, it represents another archaic human—alongside
Neanderthal, the Denisovans, and possibly Homo erectus—that lived at the same time as modern
humans during the Late Pleistocene. This finding highlights that brain size alone is not a reliable measure
of intelligence, technological skill, or adaptability.
Refinements in tool design
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
8
General Education Courses
During the Early Paleolithic in Africa
(3.3–0.2 mya), stone tool technology progressed
gradually. The earliest tools—simple hammers,
anvils, and cutting implements—gave way to
chipped flake tools and core choppers by 2.5–2.1
mya. About 1.5 mya, more sophisticated bifacial
tools such as hand axes, cleavers, and picks (the
Acheulean industry) emerged and persisted until
roughly 200,000 years ago, showing gradual
refinement over time with increasingly
symmetrical and skillfully made hand axes.
By 1.8 mya, Homo erectus had spread
into Eurasia, as seen at Dmanisi, Georgia, where tools resembled African Oldowan core-flake industries,
though bifaces were absent. Southeast Asia was occupied by H. erectus by 1.5 mya, but no definite tool
industry has been identified there. Evidence from El ʿUbeidīya, Israel, indicates that bifaces had left
Africa by 1.4 mya. In Europe, Acheulean tools appeared around 500 kya, lasting until 250–150 kya, and
bifacial tools also occurred in South and East Asia, though forms varied.
The Middle Paleolithic (approximately 200–30 kya)
shows greater regional and temporal variation. Tools were more
carefully prepared, with flakes, blades, scrapers, and hand axes
becoming more standardized. Projectile points and bone tools
appeared, including bone arrow points over 60,000 years old at
South Africa’s Sibudu Cave. Sites such as Gademotta in Ethiopia
(~275 kya) and Jebel Irhoud in Morocco (~315 kya) preserve
evidence of blade technology.
Late Paleolithic industries (50–10 kya)
display a marked diversification of tool types
and materials. People used stone, bone, wood,
antler, ivory, and shell to make long, thin
blades, microblades, and composite tools like
atlatls, harpoons, fish weirs, and bows and
arrows. Tools were frequently retouched via
pressure flaking, reflecting advanced fine-
motor skill. Late Paleolithic humans also
produced beads, pendants, needles, fish
hooks, and artistic objects, indicating
sophisticated technological and cultural
behavior.
Reduction in tooth size
Over the past 2.5–5 million years, hominin jaws and teeth gradually became smaller, likely
influenced by improved stone tools for cutting, pounding, and grinding, as well as the eventual use of
fire for cooking. However, it is difficult to determine exactly when fire was first controlled or which
species used it, since natural fires can leave archaeological traces like hearths. Evidence from China and
France suggests Homo erectus or Homo heidelbergensis may have used fire by around 460,000 years
ago, while hearths become more common after 100,000 years ago. Claims from South Africa suggest
Paranthropus robustus or Homo ergaster might have controlled fire as early as 1.5 million years ago.
Early hominin skulls retained ape-like features: small braincases, large jaws, and prominent
canine teeth. In contrast, modern humans have large braincases, smaller jaws, incisorlike canines, and
bicuspid front premolars. Male Australopithecus and Paranthropus had large chewing muscles attached
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
9
General Education Courses
to crests on the skull, powering deep jaws. Over time, Paranthropus developed larger rear teeth while
front teeth shrank, resulting in flatter faces and nonprotruding jaws. Australopithecus retained more
protruding faces with large rear teeth; species like A. afarensis show intermediate patterns between A.
anamensis and later australopiths.
Tooth wear patterns reveal dietary adaptations: A. afarensis likely stripped plant foods with
their front teeth, Paranthropus ate tougher foods, and P. robustus and P. boisei consumed hard fruits,
seeds, and pods. A. africanus may have included more meat.
In the genus Homo, teeth generally became smaller over time. H. rudolfensis retained large rear
teeth, whereas H. ergaster shows a dental pattern approaching modern humans. The reduction in tooth
size likely relates to dietary changes or food-processing techniques, though direct archaeological
evidence linking these trends is limited.
The emergence of Homo sapiens
The ancestry of humans is complex and not fully clear. Early hominins like Australopithecus,
Paranthropus, and Kenyanthropus gave rise to the genus Homo, but exactly how each species is related
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
10
General Education Courses
is debated. H. ergaster likely led to later species like H. heidelbergensis, H. erectus, and eventually H.
sapiens. Some species, like H. naledi, evolved alongside modern humans.
Neanderthals adapted to cold climates in Europe and western Asia but did not reach Africa. H. sapiens
appeared in Africa around 315–200 thousand years ago, then spread across the world, replacing other
hominins.
Genetic studies show that differences between modern humans are small, meaning race has no
biological basis.
In short, human evolution involved many species, migrations, and adaptations, leading to the worldwide
spread of modern humans.
Language, culture, and lifeways in the Pleistocene
Speech and symbolic intelligence
The origins of human language, symbolic thought, and
culture are still unclear because bones and artifacts alone cannot
show how early humans thought or communicated. Studying apes
and children gives some clues, but these comparisons are limited.
Speech requires soft tissues like the voice box, which rarely
fossilize, so it’s hard to know when articulate language emerged.
Even without speech, early humans created tools, art, and
symbolic objects—like shell beads from 82,000 years ago—
showing they could think abstractly. Prehistoric H. sapiens were
cognitively capable, even in places with few artifacts. Some
primates today can use symbols to communicate, suggesting
symbolic thinking may have evolved before spoken language.
Early humans were omnivores, but the exact role of meat in their
diet and whether hunting was coordinated is unclear. Evidence of
shelters, graves, and ritual behavior only appears in the Late Paleolithic (roughly 60–40 thousand years
ago), with some Neanderthals using ornaments and occasional burials, and H. sapiens sometimes
including grave goods.
In short: early humans had complex thought, symbolic abilities, and social behaviors, but the timing and
development of language and culture remain largely unknown.
Learning from the apes
Gorillas, chimpanzees, and bonobos provide clues about human social evolution. Gorilla groups
are male-dominated, with one dominant silverback male leading females and youngsters. Chimpanzee
societies are also male-centered, while bonobo groups are more peaceful, with adult females forming
the social core and males being less tightly bonded. Both aggression and caring behaviors exist among
these primates.
Humans likely started as promiscuous, like apes,
but cultural rules shape our mating and social
structures. Unlike apes, humans have highly varied
kinship, political, and sexual systems, expressed
symbolically as well as practically. Studying apes
can help us understand human cognition, but only
if we respect them as independent species on their
own evolutionary paths, not just as “stepping
stones” to humans.
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
11
General Education Courses
Assignment:
Instruction: Reflect on the lesson that we have in Biodiversity. Write a Short Reflective Essay:
“Why Biodiversity Matters” answering the guide questions:
Paragraph 1: Why is biodiversity important to ecosystems and humans?
Paragraph 2: How do human activities threaten biodiversity?
Paragraph 3: What actions can individuals take to help conserve biodiversity?
1. Use yellow pad paper only.
2. Write your essay by hand. Typed or printed outputs will not be accepted.
3. Your paragraph should be clear, organized, and reflective, showing your understanding of the
lesson.
4. Write neatly and legibly.
5. Write your name, course, and section on the upper-left corner of the first page.
6. Remember, DO NOT write the questions on your paper, they are GUIDE QUESTIONS only.
Needs
Excellent Good Fair
Criteria Improvement
(5 pts) (4 pts) (3 pts)
(2 pts)
Clearly explains the
Mentions all ideas
importance of biodiversity, Explains all three One or more
Content but explanations
human threats, and ideas with minor guide questions
Understanding are limited or
conservation actions with inaccuracies not addressed
unclear
accurate ideas
Shows deep reflection and Shows some
Reflection & Limited reflection; Little to no
personal understanding of reflection and
Insight mostly descriptive reflection shown
the topic understanding
Generally clear Ideas are Paragraph is
Organization & Ideas are well-organized in
with minor lapses somewhat unclear or
Clarity one clear paragraph
in flow disorganized confusing
Readable but
Handwriting & Mostly neat and
Very neat and easy to read messy in some Difficult to read
Legibility readable
parts
Followed all instructions
Minor formatting
Submission & (yellow pad, handwritten, Several instruction Did not follow
or submission
Format proper details, clear errors required format
issue
photo/scan)
Carousel Learning AY 2025-2026
12
General Education Courses
Sources: