EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS – TYPES
Experimental design refers to the structure or plan of an experiment used to test
hypotheses by manipulating independent variables and observing their effect on dependent
variables under controlled conditions.
1. ONE-GROUP DESIGN
Meaning
A one-group design involves only one group of participants, where the researcher studies
the effect of a treatment without comparing it to another group.
Types of One-Group Designs
1. One-Shot Case Study
A single group is exposed to a treatment.
Outcome is measured after treatment.
Structure:
Treatment (X) → Observation (O)
Example:
Giving a training program and testing performance afterward.
2. One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design
Same group is tested before and after the treatment.
Structure:
Pretest (O₁) → Treatment (X) → Posttest (O₂)
Example:
Measuring anxiety before and after therapy.
Advantages
Simple and easy to conduct
Requires fewer participants
Useful for preliminary or pilot studies
Disadvantages
No control group → low internal validity
Effects may be due to:
o History (external events)
o Maturation (natural changes)
o Testing effect (practice)
Cannot establish strong cause–effect relationship
2. TWO-GROUP DESIGN
Meaning
Involves two groups of participants:
Experimental group (receives treatment)
Control group (does not receive treatment)
Types of Two-Group Designs
1. Posttest-Only Control Group Design
Two groups are formed randomly.
Only posttest is conducted.
Structure:
Experimental: X → O₁
Control: — → O₂
2. Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design
Both groups are tested before and after treatment.
Structure:
Experimental: O₁ → X → O₂
Control: O₁ → — → O₂
Key Feature: Random Assignment
Participants are randomly assigned to groups.
Helps control extraneous variables.
Advantages
Better control over variables
Allows comparison between groups
Higher internal validity than one-group design
Stronger cause–effect conclusions
Disadvantages
Requires more participants
Ethical issues (withholding treatment)
Time-consuming and resource-intensive
3. FACTORIAL DESIGN
Meaning
A factorial design studies two or more independent variables (factors) simultaneously to
examine:
Their individual effects (main effects)
Their combined effect (interaction effect)
Basic Structure
Represented as:
2 × 2, 2 × 3, 3 × 3, etc.
First number = levels of first independent variable
Second number = levels of second independent variable
Example of 2 × 2 Factorial Design
Variables
Factor A: Type of Therapy (CBT / No Therapy)
Factor B: Gender (Male / Female)
Groups Formed
1. CBT – Male
2. CBT – Female
3. No Therapy – Male
4. No Therapy – Female
Types of Effects
1. Main Effect
Effect of one independent variable ignoring the other variable
Example:
Effect of therapy on depression (regardless of gender)
2. Interaction Effect
Occurs when the effect of one variable depends on the level of another variable
Example:
CBT works better for females than males → interaction
Advantages
Studies multiple variables simultaneously
Detects interaction effects (very important in psychology)
More efficient than multiple separate experiments
Provides richer and deeper understanding
Disadvantages
Complex design and analysis
Requires large sample size
Difficult interpretation when many variables are involved
COMPARISON SUMMARY
Feature One-Group Two-Group Factorial
Groups One Two Multiple
Variables One IV One IV Two or more IVs
Control Low High Very High
Complexity Simple Moderate Complex
Validity Low High Very High
KEY EXAM POINTS (Quick Revision)
One-group design → No comparison group → Weak validity
Two-group design → Experimental vs control → Stronger conclusions
Factorial design → Multiple IVs → Studies interaction effects
Main effect vs interaction effect is crucial in factorial design
Here’s your content rewritten into clear, structured exam-ready notes (with headings,
subheadings, and all points preserved) 👇
Quasi-Experimental Design
Definition
A quasi-experimental design applies an experimental interpretation to results that
do not meet all requirements of a true experiment.
The independent variable is manipulated, but participants are not randomly
assigned to conditions.
Since IV is manipulated before measuring the dependent variable, it eliminates the
directionality problem.
Also called a compromise design.
Useful when true experiments are not feasible due to ethical or practical reasons.
Types of Quasi-Experimental Design
1. Nonequivalent Groups Design
Researcher selects existing groups that appear similar.
Only one group receives the treatment.
Unlike true experiments:
o Groups are not randomly assigned
o Hence, they may differ → nonequivalent groups
Researchers try to:
o Control confounding variables
o Choose groups that are as similar as possible
✅ Most common quasi-experimental design
2. Time Series Design
Used when a control group is not possible
Involves:
o Multiple pretests
o Followed by treatment
o Then multiple posttests
Difference from single-group pretest-posttest:
o Uses series of observations, not just one
Features:
o Better control over extraneous variables
o No history effect considered
o Avoids simple statistical comparisons
3. Equivalent Time Series Design
Extension of time series design
Uses single group
Treatment is:
o Introduced and reintroduced repeatedly
Diagram:
o X₁O₁ X₀O₂ X₁O₃ X₀O₄
Where:
o X₁ = Treatment
o X₀ = No treatment / alternative condition
Advantages:
o Controls history effects
o More refined and improved design
4. Counterbalanced Design
Also called:
o Crossover design
o Switch-over design
o Rotation experiment
Uses Latin Square arrangement:
o Each treatment appears once in each row and column
Example:
o Multiple treatments given to different groups in different orders
Purpose:
o Controls order effects
5. Separate Sample Pretest-Posttest Design
Used when:
o Treatment cannot be given to all subjects at once
Process:
o One sample → treatment → measurement
o Another sample → same treatment → measurement
Different samples used for:
o Pretest and posttest
6. Patched-Up Design
Starts with a weak/inadequate design
Researcher adds features to improve it
Goal:
o Control factors causing invalidity
Improves:
o Overall validity of results
Quasi-Independent Variable Designs (Time-Based Designs)
1. Longitudinal Design
Same group studied over time
Purpose:
o Observe changes due to passage of time
Limitations:
o Affected by extraneous events
o Limited generalizability over time
2. Cross-Sectional Design
Between-subjects design
Compares:
o Different groups at different ages or time points
Faster than longitudinal
But:
o Cannot track individual change over time
3. Cohort Design
Combines:
o Longitudinal + multiple groups
Studies:
o Different generations (cohorts) over time
Shares:
o Similar advantages and disadvantages as longitudinal design
Advantages of Quasi-Experimental Design
✅ Higher external validity
o Conducted in real-world settings
✅ Better than non-experimental research
o More control over confounding variables
Disadvantages of Quasi-Experimental Design
❌ Lower internal validity than true experiments
o No randomization → harder to control all variables
❌ Retrospective data issues
o Data may be:
Inaccurate
Incomplete
Difficult to access
When to Use Quasi-Experimental Design
1. Ethical Reasons
When random assignment is unethical
Example:
o Oregon Health Study
o It would be unethical to:
Give health insurance to some
Deny others intentionally
Instead:
o Study naturally occurring situations (like lottery-based selection)
2. Practical Reasons
When true experiments are:
o Too expensive
o Difficult to implement
o Require too many resources
Quasi-experiments:
o Use existing or previously collected data
o Often rely on government or secondary data
Here are your quasi-experimental designs with clear, simple examples for each type (exam-
friendly and easy to remember) 👇
Quasi-Experimental Design (with Examples)
Definition (with example idea)
IV is manipulated, but no random assignment
Example:
o Studying effect of a new teaching method on one class vs another already
existing class (no random assignment)
Types with Examples
1. Nonequivalent Groups Design
Concept
Two existing groups
One gets treatment, the other does not
Example
A researcher studies effect of CBT on anxiety
Group 1: Patients from Hospital A → receive CBT
Group 2: Patients from Hospital B → no CBT
Groups may differ (age, severity) → nonequivalent
2. Time Series Design
Concept
Repeated measurements before and after treatment on same group
Example
Measuring students’ test scores
o Pretests: 3 monthly tests before new teaching method
o Treatment: New teaching method introduced
o Posttests: 3 tests after implementation
Compare trends before vs after
3. Equivalent Time Series Design
Concept
Treatment is repeatedly introduced and removed
Example
Studying effect of music on productivity
o Week 1: Music (X₁) → measure output
o Week 2: No music (X₀) → measure
o Week 3: Music again → measure
o Week 4: No music → measure
If productivity increases only during music weeks → stronger evidence
4. Counterbalanced Design (Crossover Design)
Concept
Same participants receive all treatments in different orders
Example
Studying effect of 3 diets on weight loss
Group 1: Diet A → B → C
Group 2: Diet B → C → A
Group 3: Diet C → A → B
Controls order effects
5. Separate Sample Pretest-Posttest Design
Concept
Different samples for pretest and posttest
Example
Study effect of awareness program on drug use
o Sample 1: Measure drug awareness (before program)
o Sample 2: After program → measure awareness
Same treatment, but different participants
6. Patched-Up Design
Concept
Start with weak design → add controls later
Example
Researcher studies online learning effectiveness
Initially:
o Only posttest scores taken (weak design)
Later adds:
o Pretest scores
o Control variables (IQ, prior knowledge)
Improves validity
Quasi-Independent Variable Designs (Time-Based)
1. Longitudinal Design
Concept
Same group studied over time
Example
Follow children from age 5 to 15
Measure:
o Cognitive development each year
2. Cross-Sectional Design
Concept
Different age groups studied at same time
Example
Compare:
o 5-year-olds, 10-year-olds, 15-year-olds
Measure cognitive ability at one point in time
3. Cohort Design
Concept
Multiple groups from different generations followed over time
Example
Study:
o People born in 2000, 2010, 2020
Track their development over years
Compare generational differences
When to Use (with Examples)
1. Ethical
Example:
o Cannot deny life-saving treatment to control group
o So use existing groups instead
2. Practical
Example:
o Government already collected education data
o Researcher uses it to study policy impact instead of conducting costly
experiment
Quick Memory Trick 🧠
Nonequivalent → Existing groups
Time series → Many tests before & after
Equivalent time series → Treatment ON-OFF
Counterbalanced → All groups get all treatments
Separate sample → Different people pre & post
Patched-up → Fix weak design
If you want, I can next convert this into MCQs or case-based questions (very useful for your
exam).