Revised Advanced Electromagnetics
Revised Advanced Electromagnetics
ABSTRACT A multiband microstrip antenna has been proposed in this research article. The proposed
antenna provides two bands. Two obtained bands are wideband in nature. Lower frequency band ranges from
(1.3–1.6) GHz with 20.68% of bandwidth. Higher frequency band ranges from (2.7-5.7) GHz with 71.42%
of bandwidth. Higher frequency band provides two 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW). The % of 3 dB
ARBW is 5.94% and 34%, respectively for the first and second circular polarized bandwidths, respectively
for the higher frequency band. Measured peak gain of 4.7 dBi and 3.5 dBi have been obtained at the lower
band and the upper band of the proposed antenna respectively. Also, good radiation patterns have been
obtained from the desired frequency of radiation. Low cost and easily available FR4 material are used as a
dielectric substrate for modeling the proposed structure. The proposed antenna is designed and simulated by
using the ansoft High Frequency Structure Simulation (HFSS) software. The antenna is fabricated and results
are compared with the simulated results. The reflection co-efficient, gain and radiation patterns of the
proposed antenna are discussed here. There are good agreements between the simulated and measurement
results. The antennas may be useful in part of L band, part of S band, part of C band, Wi-MAX and WLAN
applications etc.
a smaller antenna with increased bandwidth by bounding box The calculation of the length L/ and width W of the metal patch
geometry was suggested. For the wireless system in [18], an of the step1 is given below. The calculations are done by using
antenna with a bandwidth of 1.15 GHz to 2.90 GHz and two the equations (i-v) [1]. Here taken resonant frequency is 4.5
triangle-shaped patches and four split ring resonators was GHz.
proposed. In [19], a U-shaped antenna with slots was Here width of the metal patch of the basic antenna (step1) is,
proposed for use in broadband applications. In order to
achieve dual band with circular polarization, a smaller
30 2
antenna was suggested in [20]. According to a report in [21], W= ,
a microstrip antenna was proposed for Global System for 2(4.5) 4.4 + 1
Mobile communication (GSM) and Wi-MAX applications = 2 cm (i)
with two ARBW of 1.69 GHz to 1.94 GHz and 3.64 GHz to The effective dielectric constant (εeff) of the metal patch is
3.88 GHz by using ring slots and U-shaped slots. In [22], a 4.4 + 1 4.4 − 1 45/7 0.16
microstrip antenna with circular polarization and dual band Ԑ011 = + ,1 + 12( )
was presented. A microstrip antenna [23] can reach a 3 dB 2 2 2
axial ratio bandwidth of (3.25-3.43) GHz by using slots. A
circular ultra-wideband antenna with band notch capability = 3.9 cm. (ii)
using fractal geometry was reported in [24]. Using fractal The increased length of the metal patch of the basic antenna
geometry dual band notched ultrawideband antenna was (step1) is, ∆L/
proposed in [25].
2
(3.9 + 3)( 0.264)
△ L/ = (0.16 × 0.412) 0.16
In this paper, a dual band microstrip antenna has been (3.9 − 0.258)(
2
+ 0.8)
proposed. To design the proposed antenna, at first, a 0.16
reference antenna is considered as step1. Then, using
monopole geometry and modified the radiating patch, the = 0.0309 cm (iii)
microstrip antenna (reference antenna) converts into a The true length of the metal patch of the basic antenna (step1)
proposed antenna which shows dual band, broadband and is
𝜆
circularly polarized characteristics. The antenna may be L/ = − 2 △ L/
useful in various wireless applications. 2
= 1.62 cm (iv)
II. ANTENNA GEOMETRY So, the effective length of the metal patch of the basic antenna
The proposed antenna is shown in Figure 1. The proposed (step1) is
antenna is designed and simulated by HFSS simulation Leff = L/+2ΔL/ = 1.68 cm (v)
software. FR4 dielectric substrate with a height (h) of 1.6 mm, After calculation, the taken optimized length and width of the
a dielectric constant (εr) of 4.4 and a loss tangent of 0.023 is metal patch of the basic antenna (step1) are 14.53 mm and
used to design the proposed antenna. The total substrate 19.22 mm, respectively. The optimized length and width of the
volume to design the proposed antennas is 60×60×1.6 mm3. inset feed line is taken as L0 = 5 mm and W0 = 0.6 mm
All dimensions are shown in the layout of Figure 1. The respectively. All the dimensions of the proposed antenna are
evolution process of the proposed structure is shown in Figure tabulated in the TABLE I.
2. The evolution process consists of three steps. First step is TABLE I. Dimensions of the proposed antenna (mm)
shown in Figure 2(a).This step consists of microstrip antenna
with an inset feed transmission line. Figure 2(b) shows the Parameter Dimension Parameter Dimension
A 60 H 10
step2 which is the broadband antenna. It uses truncated ground B 60 I 4.61
plane and microstrip line feed technique to excite the antenna. C 2.26 J 5
Third step is shown in Figure 2(c). It uses some additional slits D 14.52 K 12.8
E 4.61 L 2.74
to obtain circular polarization characteristics. The microstrip F 30.06 M 22.74
transmission line (22.74×3.06 mm2) feed technique is used to G 15 N 5
excite the proposed antenna. The simulated reflection co-
efficient verses frequency curve for the proposed antenna is
shown in Figure 3(a), the simulated axial ratio versus
frequency curve of the proposed structure is shown in Figure
3(b) and the simulated gain versus frequency curve is shown
in Figure 3(c). After comparing different steps, the third step
has been considered as the proposed antenna. Snapshots of the
proposed antenna including its different steps is shown in
Figure 4(a, b and c).
(c)
FIGURE 2. Evolution of the proposed antenna (a) step1 (b) step2 (c) step3
(proposed antenna)
FIGURE 4. Snapshot of the different steps of the proposed antenna (a) step1
(b) Step2 (c) step3 (proposed antenna)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)
FIGURE 5. Parametric studies for Lg parameter (a) the reflection co- efficient
versus frequency curve (b) axial ratio versus frequency curve
(a)
(b)
(b)
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
FIGURE 10. Parametric studies for G parameter (a) the reflection co-efficient
versus frequency curve (b) axial ratio versus frequency curve
(4.5–4.7) GHz with a centre frequency of 4.6 GHz where as bandwidth (ARBW). The 3 dB axial ratio versus frequency
measured band of frequency ranges from 4.46 GHz to 4.76 plot is shown in Figure 14. Two 3 dB axial ratio
GHz with a centre frequency of 4.7 GHz. The magnitude of bandwidths have been obtained in the second wideband of
the simulated reflection coefficient is -21.85 dB at a resonant (6.3-2.3) GHz. Two 3 dB ARBW bandwidth are (4.9-5.2)
frequency of 4.6 GHz. The magnitude of the measured GHz and (6.06-6.27 GHz). The % of 3 dB ARBW is 5.94%
reflection coefficient is -21.4 dB at a resonant frequency of and 34%, respectively for the first and second CP
4.7 GHz. The simulated bandwidth of the step1 is (4.7–4.5) bandwidths, respectively.
GHz = 0.20 GHz and the percentage bandwidth is 4.34%.
The measured bandwidth of the microstrip antenna is (4.76– (a)
4.46) GHz = 0.30 GHz and the percentage bandwidth is
6.5%. The bandwidth is narrow. Now to increase the
impedance bandwidth of the step1, step2 has been modified
and step2 uses monopole concept to broaden the bandwidth.
Figure 11(b) depicts a plot of the reflection coefficient versus
frequency curve. The range of the simulated frequency is
(2.2-6.1) GHz with a deep resonant frequency of 5 GHz and
the measured frequency range is (2.32-6.12) GHz. The
simulated bandwidth of the step2 is (6.1-2.2) GHz = 3.9 GHz
and the percentage bandwidth are 93.97%. The measured
bandwidth of the antenna is (2.32-6.12) GHz =3.8
GHz with the percentage bandwidth of 90.04%. The (b)
reflection co-efficient versus frequency plot of the step3
(proposed antenna) is shown in Figure 11(c). The proposed
antenna supports dual bands. One band is very narrow and
the other band is wide. The simulated first band is (1.3–1.6)
GHz with a deep centre frequency of 1.5 GHz. The measured
first band is (1.3–1.6) GHz with a deep resonant frequency
of 1.4 GHz. The simulated and measured bandwidth of the
first band is 0.30 GHz with a percentage bandwidth of
20.68%. The second band is wideband. The simulated
bandwidth for the second band of the proposed antenna is
(6.3-2.3) GHz=4 GHz and the percentage bandwidth are (c)
93.02%. The measured bandwidth for the second band of the FIGURE 11: Reflection co-efficient plot for (a) step1, (b) step2 and(c)
proposed antenna is (2.7-5.7) GHz =3 GHz and the step3 (proposed antenna)
percentage bandwidth are 71.42%. The peak gain for the
different steps of the proposed antenna has been observed at
some frequencies. The simulated peak gain is 4.6 dBi at the
resonant frequency of 4.6 GHz has been obtained from the
step1. The measured peak gain of 4 dBi has been obtained at
4.7 GHz from the step1. In case of step2, the simulated peak
gain of 3.8 dBi is obtained at a resonant frequency of 4.9 GHz
whereas the measured peak gain of 4.1 dBi has been obtained
at the frequency of 4.9 GHz. The peak gain plot of the
proposed antenna is shown in Figure 12. In lower band, 5.1
dBi simulated peak gain has been obtained at 1.5 GHz of the
proposed antenna whereas 4.7 dBi measured peak gain has
been obtained at 1.5 GHz from the proposed antenna structure.
FIGURE 12: Gain plot for proposed antenna
In upper band, the simulated and measured peak gain at 4.2
GHz frequency is 5.1 dBi and 3.5 dBi respectively.
The suitable normalized E-H plane radiation patterns have
been obtained for the step1, step2 and the proposed antenna
(step3) are shown in Figure 13(a-f). The LHCP and RHCP
radiation patterns at the frequency of 5.2 GHz of the
proposed antenna are shown in Figure 13(g-h).
The proposed antenna provides an additional characteristic
of circular polarization in the second band. The circular
polarization (CP) is defined by the 3 dB axial ratio
(c) (d)
FIGURE 14: Axial ratio versus frequency curve of the proposed antenna
V. CONCLUSION
In this article, a dual broadband circularly polarized microstip
antenna has been proposed. The antenna provides a narrow
band of 1.3 GHz to 1.6 GHz bandwidth and a wide bandwidth
of 2.7 GHz to 5.7 GHz bandwidth. The measured peak gain of
4.7 dBi and 3.5 dBi have been observed at the lower band and
upper band of the proposed antenna respectively. Also 3 dB
axial ratio bandwidth has been observed at the upper band of
the proposed antenna. Satisfied radiation patterns have been
observed from the proposed antenna. The antenna may be
applicable in various wireless fields.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are thankful to Prof. Partha Pratim Sarkar and Dr. application in wireless communication systems,” IET Microwaves,
Antennas & Propagation, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1222-1230, April 2018.
Sushanta Sarkar for their help to carry out the works. I am [19] K. Mondal and P. P. Sarkar, “U-shape broadband monopole antenna
thankful to Department of Engineering and Technological with modified ground plane,” Microwave Optical Technology Letter,
Studies of University of Kalyani for their help and inspiration. vol 58, no. 11, pp. 2544–2547, November 2016.
[20] J. Yuan, Z. Chen, Z. D. Chen and Y. Li, “A compact dual-
band microstrip ring antenna using multiring ground for GPS L1/L2-
REFERENCES band,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol.
[1] C. A. Balanis, “Microstrip Antennas,” in Antenna Theory: Analysis 20, no. 12, pp. 2250-2254, August 2021.
and Design, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., [21] S. P. Gangwar, K. Gangwar and A. Kumar,
2005, ch.14, sec. 14.1, pp. 811–882. “Dual band modified circular ring shaped slot antenna for GSM and
[2] G. Kumar and K. P. Ray, “An Introduction to Microstrip Antennas,” WiMAX applications,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters,
in Broadband Microstrip Antennas, 1st ed. Norwood, MA, USA: vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 2752-2759, December 2019.
Artech House, 2003, ch. 1, sec. 1.1, pp. 1–34. [Online]. Available: [22] P. M. Paul, K. Kandasamy and M. S. Sharawi, “A corner expanded
[Link] slot antenna loaded with copper strips for dual-
[3] K-L. Wong, “Introduction and Overview" in Compact and Broadband band circular polarization characteristics,” Microwave and Optical
Microstrip Antennas, 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Technology Letters, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 491-497, October 2019.
Inc., 2002, ch. 1, sec. 1.1, pp. 1–22. [23] S. Hao, Q. Chen, J. Li and J. Xie, “A high-gain
[4] R. Anand and P. Chawla, “A novel dual-wideband inscribed circularly polarized slotted patch antenna,” IEEE Antennas and
hexagonal fractal slotted microstrip antenna for C- and X-band Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1022-1026, April
applications,” Int J RF Microw Comput Aided Eng., vol 30, no. 9, May 2020.
2020. [24] R. Ghatak, B. Biswas, A. Karmakar and D. R. Poddar, “A circular
[5] Ambika, C. Tharini and MT. Ali, “Novel D SRR-based dual band fractal UWB antenna based on descartes circle theorem with band
antenna for WiMAX/C applications,” Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol rejection capability,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, vol.
61, no. 2, pp. 1–7, February 2019. 37, pp. 235-248, January 2013.
[6] D. Lee, K. Kim and S. Pyo, “Dual-band monopolar microstrip antenna [25] B. Biswas, R. Ghatak, A. Karmakar and D. R. Poddar, “Dual band
using a quasi-circularly arranged mushroom resonator on meshed notched UWB monopole antenna using embedded Omega slot and
ground structure,” Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol. 61, no. fractal shaped ground plane,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research
12, pp. 1–5, July 2019. C, vol. 53, pp. 177-186, January 2014.
[7] S. P. Gangwar, K. Gangwar and A. Kumar, “Dual band modified
circular ring-shaped slot antenna for GSM and WiMAX applications,”
Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1–8, July 2019.
[8] Y. Mao, S. Guo and M. Chen, “Compact dual-band monopole
antennawith defected ground plane for Internet of Things,”
Microwaves, Antenna & Propagation, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1332-1338,
April 2018.
[9] A. De, B. Roy and Anup Kumar Bhattacharjee, “Miniaturized dual
band consumer transceiver antenna for 5G-enabled IoT-based home
applications,” Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol. 34, no. 11, July 2021.
[10] Y. Chawanonphithak, “Miniaturized dual-band V-shaped monopole
antenna fed by v-stub,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 86, pp. 43–
46, March 2016.
[11] R. P. Dwivedi and U. K. Kommuri, “CPW feed dual band and
wideband antennas using crescent shaped and T-shape stub for Wi-Fi
and WiMAX application,” Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol. 59, no. 10,
pp. 2586-2591, July 2017.
[12] S. Chen, D. Dong, Z. Liao, Q. Cai and G. Liu, “Compact wideband
and dual-band antenna for TD-LTE and WLAN applications,”
Electronics Letters, vol. 50, no. 16, pp. 1111-1112, July 2014.
[13] R. Leyva-Hernandez, J. A. Tirado-Mendez, H. Jardon-Aguilar, R.
Flores-Leal and R. L. Y. Miranda, “Reduced size elliptic uwb antenna
with inscribed third iteration sierpinski triangle for on-body
applications,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 59, no.
3, pp. 635-641, March 2017.
[14] S. Rawat and K. K. Sharma, “Annular ring microstrip patch antenna
with finite ground plane for ultra-wideband applications,”
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, vol.
7, no. 2 pp. 179–184, April 2015.
[15] M. S. Pandey and V. S. Chaudhary, “Defected star-shaped microstrip
patch antenna for broadband applications,” Progress In
Electromagnetics Research C, vol. 118, pp. 11–24, 2022.
[16] [Link], W. Lin, Y. Chen, Z. Yanting, H. T. Chattha and A. B. Sharif,
“Wideband tapered slot antenna for applications in ground penetrating
radar,” Microw Opt Technol Lett., vol.62, no. 7, pp. 2562-2568, July
2020.
[17] E. T. Ashong and Y-B. Jung, “Bandwidth enhancement and size
reduction of printed monopole antenna using bounding box structure,”
IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1484-
1490, May 2019.
[18] M. Alibakhshikenari, B. S. Virdee, C. H. See, R. A-Alhameed, A. Ali,
F. Falcone and E. Limiti, “Wideband printed monopole antenna for