Scribd
Upload
3 views2 pages

Reference Check Questions

The reference for Albert N. Sullano, a candidate for a Maintenance Worker position, highlights his strong work ethic, positive attitude, and ability to handle pressure effectively as a Chief Engineer. He is described as reliable, dependable, and capable of maintaining good relationships with colleagues, with his work rated as above average. The reference indicates no performance issues and expresses a willingness to recommend him for the position.

Uploaded by

Ma. Jisselle Mascardo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views2 pages

Reference Check Questions

The reference for Albert N. Sullano, a candidate for a Maintenance Worker position, highlights his strong work ethic, positive attitude, and ability to handle pressure effectively as a Chief Engineer. He is described as reliable, dependable, and capable of maintaining good relationships with colleagues, with his work rated as above average. The reference indicates no performance issues and expresses a willingness to recommend him for the position.

Uploaded by

Ma. Jisselle Mascardo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

General Reference Request

Candidate Name: Position Applied For: MAINTENANCE


ALBERT N. SULLANO WORKER

Name of Reference: Title/Relationship: CO-WORKER


RODRIGO J. MANSILLA JR
Company: KJCM (AEGEAN) Phone Number:
Employment Dates: Reason for Leaving:
Position Held/Responsibilities:
 CHIEF ENGINEER

Questions which we would appreciate answers to:

1. Can you describe this candidate’s work ethic and attitude?

-Mr. Albert Sullano always shows strong work ethic, positive attitude and a diligent Chief
Engineer onboard that always strives to deliver high quality results. He always
consistently met deadlines and exceeded expectations, and through his hard work and
dedication he was awarded as one of the best Chief engineers in the company.

2. How does this candidate handle pressure/stress in the workplace?

-Mr. Albert Sullano always remains calm and maintains his composure during
pressure/stress situations. He prioritized tasks, delegated effectively, and
communicated with the engine team to ensure we met our goals.

3. Can you describe this candidate’s reliability and dependability / flexibility? How
was/is their ability to balance multiple projects/duties with changing
priorities/deadlines?

-He consistently meets deadlines and delivers high quality of work. He demonstrates
integrity, honesty and transparency in his words and actions. He is also reliable and
dependable, always willing to lend a hand when needed.

4. Describe this candidate’s relationships with the people he/she worked/works with.
Has there ever been conflict with another employee? How was the conflict resolved?
Customers/clients/employees?

-Mr. Sullano can communicate effectively with our colleagues and with the whole ship’s
crew. He is approachable and we appreciate his willingness to help, which is a true
leader who inspires and motivates others.

He has never been in trouble, and he always shows professionalism in his work.
5. How would you rate the quality of this candidate’s work? (Below average, average,
above average). How do they handle their mistakes when errors are made?

- I can rate his work as above average. When mistakes are made, he recognizes
and acknowledges the mistake, and takes full responsibility for his actions. He
also apologizes if necessary to those affected to show his concern and empathy.

6. What is this candidate’s strongest area?


-
7. What is this candidate’s area to improve or opportunity of growth professionally?

8. Are there any performance issues, inappropriate conduct, or criminal action that
could impact our decision to hire?

9. Would you recommend this individual to work in a school setting with


International adolescent students?

10. Would you hire this individual again?

11. Is there anything about this candidate that you feel you have not had the opportunity
to convey which you deem pertinent to consider in our decision making process?

You might also like